Efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of PD-1 inhibitors combined with lenvatinib and Gemox chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter real-world study

Conversion treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Opportunities and challenges

The prevalence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is increasing globally. Despite advancements in comprehending this intricate malignancy and formulating novel therapeutic approaches over the past few decades, the prognosis for ICC remains poor. Owing to the high degree of malignancy and insidious onset of ICC, numerous cases are detected at intermediate or advanced stages of the disease, hence eliminating the chance for surgical intervention. Moreover, because of the highly invasive characteristics of ICC, recurrence and metastasis postresection are prevalent, leading to a 5-year survival rate of only 20%-35% following surgery. In the past decade, different methods of treatment have been investigated, including transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and combination therapies. For certain patients with advanced ICC, conversion treatment may be utilized to facilitate surgical resection and manage disease progression. This review summarizes the definition of downstaging conversion treatment and presents the clinical experience and evidence concerning conversion treatment for advanced ICC.

Application of machine learning models to explore prognosis and cause of death in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study was aimed at examining the causes of death (CODs) in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) undergoing chemotherapy (CT). In addition, machine learning models were incorporated to predict the treatment outcomes of patients with advanced ICC and identify the factors most closely related to prognosis.

METHODS

A total of 5564 patients (CT group, 3632; non-CT group, 1932) were included in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registries between 2000 and 2020. The CODs were compared between the two groups before and after the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Furthermore, seven machine learning models were utilized as predictive tools to select variable features, aiming to assess the therapeutic effectiveness in patients with advanced ICC.

RESULTS

After IPTW, the CT group exhibited a lower cumulative incidence of cholangiocarcinoma-related deaths (30%, 49%, and 73% vs. 59%, 66%, and 73%; P < 0.001), secondary malignant neoplasms (8.5%, 13%, and 20% vs. 19%, 22%, and 24%; P < 0.001), and other CODs (1.8%, 2.9%, and 4.4% vs. 4.1%, 4.6%, and 5.4%; P < 0.001) at 0.5-, 1-, and 3- years than the non-CT group, whereas the cumulative incidence of cardiovascular diseases (P = 0.4) was comparable between the two groups. Of the seven machine learning models, the random forest model showed the highest predictive effectiveness. This model verified that variables such as CT, radiotherapy, tumor dimensions, sex, and distant metastasis were strongly correlated with the prognosis of advanced ICC.

CONCLUSIONS

CT has improved the therapeutic efficacy of advanced ICC without significantly increasing other CODs. Furthermore, the analysis of various features using machine learning models has confirmed that the random forest model demonstrates the highest predictive performance.

Comparison analysis of ICIs and chemotherapy combined with or without lenvatinib as first-line treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Effective first-line treatments for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remain limited. This real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy combined with or without Lenvatinib as first-line treatment in unresectable ICC patients and identify predictors of treatment response and prognosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 58 patients with unresectable ICC received either dual therapy (ICIs plus chemotherapy) or triple therapy (ICIs plus chemotherapy and Lenvatinib) as first-line treatment. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Survival curve was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was performed to investigate risk factors of PFS and OS.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between triple therapy and dual therapy as first-line treatment for unresectable ICC patients in terms of PFS (median PFS: 10.3 vs. 11.1 months, P > 0.05) and OS (median OS: 14.0 vs. 15.0 months, P > 0.05). The ORR (39.4% vs. 30.4%) and DCR (90.9% vs. 73.9%) were comparable between the triple therapy group and dual therapy group (P > 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, tumor burden score (TBS, ≥ 8) and tumor number (≥ 2) were associated with prolonged PFS (P < 0.05), while TBS was an independent factor for OS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Triple therapy did not demonstrate any benefit on both PFS and OS compared to dual therapy as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable ICC. TBS and tumor number may guide treatment stratification.

mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1 inhibitors versus GC/GS/GEMOX chemotherapy as a first line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Biliary tract tumors (BTC) account for about 3% of all digestive system tumors, with rising incidence and limited treatment options, particularly for advanced stages, underscoring the need for innovative therapies. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen combining hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX-HAIC) alongside lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i) compared to standard regimens of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, gemcitabine plus S1, or gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GC/GS/GEMOX) in advanced BTC patients treated from March 2019 to November 2023. A total of 89 patients were analyzed, with 55 receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and 34 receiving the GC/GS/GEMOX regimens. Among these, 23 patients were in the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group, while 24 were in the GC/GS/GEMOX group. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group was 15 months compared to 6 months for the GC/GS/GEMOX group. Similarly, the median overall survival (mOS) was 20 months for the mFOLFOXHAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group versus 13 months for the GC/GS/GEMOX group. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group were 48.5% and 87.0%, respectively, both significantly higher than those observed in the GC/GS/GEMOX group at three months of treatment. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group and the GC/GS/GEMOX group, at 86.5% and 84.2%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in complication rates. Overall, mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i appears to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment for advanced BTC, demonstrating superior mPFS and mOS compared to standard regimens.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in combination with lenvatinib and durvalumab versus standard first-line treatment gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

In patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory despite the recommended first-line treatment of gemcitabine with cisplatin and durvalumab (GCD). We recently reported that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib and durvalumab (HLD) exhibited promising antitumor activity and manageable adverse events in patients with unresectable ICC. Here, we aimed to compare HLD with GCD in patients with advanced ICC. This retrospective study included consecutive patients with advanced ICC administered HLD or GCD between January 2020 and March 2024. Safety and patient outcomes, including overall and progression-free survival and objective response rate, were compared between the two groups. The study cohort included 31 and 28 patients in the HLD and GCD groups, respectively. Compared to the GCD group, the HLD group experienced significantly better overall survival (median, 15.8 vs. 9.6 months; P = 0.033), longer progression-free survival (median, 10.3 vs. 4.1 months; P = 0.007), and a higher objective response rate (46.2% vs. 13.1%; P = 0.009). By subgroup analysis, patients with single tumor, intrahepatic tumors >5 cm, or unilobar tumors benefited more from HLD treatment. Additionally, the rates of any grade and grade 3-4 adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups (100% vs. 92.9%, P = 0.221; 32.3% vs. 42.9%, P = 0.401; respectively). In conclusion, HLD treatment was tolerable and associated with better survival benefits compared to the standard first-line GCD treatment in patients with advanced ICC, especially in those with single tumor, intrahepatic tumors >5 cm, and unilobar tumors.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies plus GEMOX chemotherapy as non-first-line systemic therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, and gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy have shown significant antitumor activity as first-line therapy against biliary tract cancer. This study evaluated their efficacy and safety as non-first-line therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC).

METHODS

Patients with advanced GBC who received lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies and GEMOX chemotherapy as a non-first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients with advanced GBC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 11.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-20.9) months, and the ORR was 36.1%. The median OS and PFS were 15.1 (95% CI: 3.2-26.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 4.9-7.2) months, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 75% and 61.1%, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without PD-L1 expression. Additionally, patients with a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5.57 had a longer OS than those with an NLR ≥ 5.57. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with 61.1% experiencing grade 3 or 4 AEs, including myelosuppression (13.9%) and fatigue (13.3%), alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase levels (8.3%), and diarrhea (8.3%). No grade 5 AEs were reported.

CONCLUSION

Anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with lenvatinib and GEMOX chemotherapy are effective and well-tolerated as a non-first-line therapy in advanced GBC. PD-L1 expression and baseline NLR may potentially predict treatment efficacy.

Prognostic value of FGFR2 alterations in patients with iCCA undergoing surgery or systemic treatments: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Over recent years, there has been a notable rise in the incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), which presents a significant challenge in treatment due to its complex disease characteristics and prognosis. Notably, the identification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion/rearrangement, a potential oncogenic driver primarily observed in iCCA, raises questions about its impact on the prognostic outcomes of patients undergoing surgical intervention or other therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

A comprehensive search from inception to July 2023 was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. The objective was to identify relevant publications comparing the prognosis of FGFR2 alterations and no FGFR2 alterations groups among patients with iCCA undergoing surgical resection or other systemic therapies. The primary outcome indicators, specifically Overall Survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS), were estimated using Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and statistical significance was defined as p < .05. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 software and Stata, version 12.0.

RESULTS

Six studies, involving 1314 patients (FGFR2 alterations group n = 173 and no FGFR2 alterations group n = 1141), were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed that the FGFR2 alterations group exhibited a significantly better OS prognosis compared to the no FGFR2 alterations group, with a fixed-effects combined effect size HR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.001-1.715, p = .049. Furthermore, meta-regression and subgroup analysis showed that the length of the follow-up period did not introduce heterogeneity into the results. This finding indicates the stability and reliability of the study outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The current study provides compelling evidence that FGFR2 alterations are frequently associated with improved survival outcomes for patients with iCCA undergoing surgical resection or other systemic treatments. Additionally, the study suggests that FGFR2 holds promise as a safe and dependable therapeutic target for managing metastatic, locally advanced or unresectable iCCA. This study offers a novel perspective in the realm of targeted therapy for iCCA, presenting a new and innovative approach to its treatment.

The current status and future of targeted-immune combination for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and the third leading cause of death worldwide. surgery, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), systemic therapy, local ablation therapy, radiotherapy, and targeted drug therapy with agents such as sorafenib. However, the tumor microenvironment of liver cancer has a strong immunosuppressive effect. Therefore, new treatments for liver cancer are still necessary. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), along with high levels of immunosuppressive cytokines, induce T cell inhibition and are key mechanisms of immune escape in HCC. Recently, immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy or in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-angiogenesis drugs, chemotherapy agents, and topical therapies has offered great promise in the treatment of liver cancer. In this review, we discuss the latest advances in ICIs combined with targeted drugs (targeted-immune combination) and other targeted-immune combination regimens for the treatment of patients with advanced HCC (aHCC) or unresectable HCC (uHCC), and provide an outlook on future prospects. The literature reviewed spans the last five years and includes studies identified using keywords such as "hepatocellular carcinoma," "immune checkpoint inhibitors," "targeted therapy," "combination therapy," and "immunotherapy".

Case report: Translational treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Tislelizumab, Lenvatinib, and GEMOX in one case

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) is one of the most common invasive malignancies. Currently, ICC is treated with radical surgical resection. However, the majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, making surgery ineligible for them.

Case presentation

We present a case of advanced ICC, which could not undergo radical surgery due to tumor invasion of liver blood vessels. The gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen combined with Tislelizumab immunotherapy and Lenvatinib targeted therapy for 8 cycles resulted in significant tumor shrinkage significantly and the vascular invasion disappeared. CA19-9 levels were reduced to normal levels. Partial remission and successful tumor transformation were achieved. The patient underwent a successful radical surgical resection, including cholecystectomy, resection of liver segments IV, V, and VIII, as well as a regional lymphatic dissection procedure, resulting in complete pathological remission.

Conclusion

Tumor-free surgical margins (R0) resection of patients with advanced ICC after combination of immune, targeted and chemotherapy is rare, and there are almost no cases of complete postoperative remission. The GEMOX regimen in combination with Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib has a good antitumor efficacy and safety profile, and may be a feasible and safe translational treatment option for advanced ICC.

Unveiling the promise of PD1/PD-L1: A new dawn in immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a rare yet notably aggressive cancer, has experienced a surge in incidence in recent years. Presently, surgical resection remains the most effective curative strategy for CCA. Nevertheless, a majority of patients with CCA are ineligible for surgical removal at the time of diagnosis. For advanced stages of CCA, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is established as the standard chemotherapy regimen. Despite this, treatment efficacy is often hindered by the development of resistance. In recent times, immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly those that block programmed death 1 and its ligand (PD1/PD-L1), have emerged as promising strategies against a variety of cancers and are being increasingly integrated into the therapeutic landscape of CCA. A growing body of research supports that the use of PD1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in conjunction with chemotherapy may significantly improve patient outcomes. This article seeks to meticulously review the latest studies on PD1/PD-L1 involvement in CCA, delving into their expression profiles, prognostic significance, contribution to oncogenic processes, and their potential clinical utility.

The fibrosis-4 index is a prognostic factor for cholangiocarcinoma patients who received immunotherapy

Background

Research of immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma has yielded some results, but more clinical data are needed to prove its efficacy and safety. Moreover, there is a need to identify accessible indexes for selecting patients who may benefit from such treatments.

Methods

The medical records of 66 cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent immunotherapy were retrospectively collected. The effectiveness of immunotherapy was assessed by tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), while safety was evaluated by adverse events during treatment. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic risk factors for PFS and OS, and Kaplan-Meier curves of potential prognostic factors were drawn.

Results

Overall, in this study, immunotherapy achieved an objective response rate of 24.2% and a disease control rate of 89.4% for the included patients. The median PFS was 445 days, and the median OS was 772.5 days. Of the 66 patients, 65 experienced adverse events during treatment, but none had severe consequences. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that tumor number is a prognostic risk factor for disease progression following immunotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma patients, while tumor differentiation and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index are independent risk factors for OS.

Conclusion

In general, immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma is safe, with adverse events remaining within manageable limits, and it can effectively control disease progression in most patients. The FIB-4 index may reflect the potential benefit of immunotherapy for patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

The predictive value of PD-L1 expression in response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy offers promising results for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, patients show highly heterogeneous responses to treatment, and predictive biomarkers are lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker for treatment response and survival in patients with BTC undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature search through June 2023, utilizing the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) according to PD-L1 expression. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify possible sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies was included in the final analysis. Pooled analysis showed no significant differences in ORR (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.94-2.56) and DCR (OR, 1.84; 95% CIs, 0.88-3.82) between PD-L1 (+) and PD-L1 (-) patients. In contrast, survival analysis showed improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54, 95% CIs, 0.41-0.71) and OS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.72) among PD-L1 (+) patients compared to PD-L1 (-) patients. Sensitivity analysis excluding retrospective studies showed no significant differences with the primary results. Furthermore, meta-regression demonstrated that drug target (PD-1 vs. PD-L1), presence of additional intervention (monotherapy vs. combination therapy), and PD-L1 cut-off level (1% vs. ≥5%) significantly affected the predictive value of PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression might be a helpful biomarker for predicting PFS and OS in patients with BTC undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. The predictive value of PD-L1 expression can be significantly influenced by diagnostic or treatment variables.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023434114.

Lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor plus Gemox chemotherapy versus plus HAIC for advanced biliary tract cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with oxaliplatin plus gemcitabine (Gemox) chemotherapy or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

METHOD

This study involved 86 patients with advanced BTC receiving PD-1 inhibitor and lenvatinib combined with HAIC (P-L-H group) or Gemox chemothrapy (P-L-G group). Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) analysis was used to balance potential bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULT

After PSM, a total of 60 patients were enrolled with 30 in the P-L-G group and 30 in the P-L-H group. The median PFS was significantly longer with P-L-G group (13.7 versus 6.0 months, p < 0.0001) than with the P-L-H group. The median OS was 23.8 months in the P-L-G group versus 11.6 months in the P-L-H group (p < 0.0001). Patients in the P-L-G group exhibited a better ORR (73.3 % vs 30 %, p = 0.002) compared to the P-L-H group. The DCR was the same in both groups, 96.7 %, respectively. The P-L-G group had a higher incidence of grade 3-4 AEs than the P-L-H group. However, there was no significant difference in the any grade or grade 3-4 of AEs between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

PD-1 inhibitor plus lenvatinib and Gemox are promising first-line regimens for the treatment of advanced BTC in the multicenter retrospective real-world study.

Nomogram for Predicting Survival Post-Immune Therapy in Cholangiocarcinoma Based on Inflammatory Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Immune therapy, especially involving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, has shown promise as a therapeutic option for cholangiocarcinoma. However, limited studies have evaluated survival outcomes in cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with immune therapy. This study aims to develop a predictive model to evaluate the survival benefits of immune therapy in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 120 cholangiocarcinoma patients from Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with survival following immune therapy. A predictive model was constructed and validated using calibration curves (CC), decision curve analysis (DCA), concordance index (C-index), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Cox regression analysis identified several factors as potential predictors of survival post-immune therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: treatment cycle (<6 vs ≥ 6 months, 95% CI: 0.119-0.586, P = 0.001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR <3.08 vs ≥ 3.08, 95% CI: 1.864-9.624, P = 0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA <4.13 vs ≥ 4.13, 95% CI: 1.175-5.321, P = 0.017), and presence of bone metastasis (95% CI: 1.306-6.848, P = 0.010). The nomogram model achieved good predictive accuracy with a C-index of 0.811. CC indicated strong concordance between the predicted and observed outcomes. Multi-timepoint ROC curves at 1, 2, and 3 years validated the model's performance (1-year AUC: 0.906, 2-year AUC: 0.832, 3-year AUC: 0.822). The multi-timepoint DCA curves also demonstrated a higher net benefit compared to extreme curves.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram model, incorporating key risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma patients post-immune therapy, demonstrates robust predictive accuracy for survival outcomes, offering the potential for improved clinical decision-making.

Angiogenesis: the Yin and Yang in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The tumor microenvironment (TME) constitutes a complex structure comprising different cell types and soluble factors that surround the tumor and promote its progression. Primarily for its pivotal role in malignant growth, TME has become a potential therapeutic objective for developing new targeted therapy and a marker for assessing therapeutic response. In intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), the second most common primary liver malignancy, TME has also gained a central role in understanding the mechanisms underlying tumor progression. In this review, we focused on the role of angiogenic factors and their pathway in iCCA and analyzed possible therapeutic and prognostic implications.

Case Report: Camrelizumab combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in the treatment of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report and literature review

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is one of the most common invasive malignant tumors, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Currently, radical surgical resection is the preferred treatment for ICC. However, most patients are only diagnosed at an advanced stage and are therefore not eligible for surgery. Herein, we present a case of advanced ICC in which radical surgery was not possible due to tumor invasion of the second porta hepatis and right hepatic artery. Six treatment cycles with a gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen combined with camrelizumab immunotherapy achieved a partial response and successful tumor conversion, as tumor invasion of the second porta hepatis and right hepatic artery was no longer evident. The patient subsequently underwent successful radical surgical resection, including hepatectomy, caudate lobe resection, and cholecystectomy combined with lymph node dissection. Cases of patients with advanced ICC undergoing surgical resection after combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy are rare. The GEMOX regimen combined with camrelizumab demonstrated favorable antitumor efficacy and safety, suggesting that it might be a potential feasible and safe conversion therapy strategy for patients with advanced ICC.