Treatment of primary malignant bone tumours of the distal tibia

Limb salvage surgery reconstructive techniques following long-bone lower limb oncological resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is now considered the gold standard surgical treatment for lower limb bone sarcomas. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing the various LSS reconstructive options. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare functional outcomes and complications of LSS reconstructive techniques.

METHODS

The primary aim of the meta-analysis was to determine functional outcomes from the pooled data utilizing the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score (MSTS). Comparisons could then made for this outcome between biological and prosthetic, vascularised and non-vascularised, and prosthetic and composite reconstructions. The secondary aim was to compare complication outcomes of each reconstruction. Standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) and odds ratios were estimated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with a total of 785 patients were included. We found structural failure was 75% less likely to occur in prosthetic reconstruction compared to biological (OR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.79; P = 0.02). We did not find any evidence of difference in function (MSTS score) between vascularised verses non-vascularised reconstructions (Cohen's d = -1.14; 95% CI = -3.06 to 0.78; I2  = 87%). Other analyses comparing complications found no difference between the reconstructive groups.

CONCLUSION

The study found no correlation between functional outcomes and the type of LSS reconstruction. Structural failure was more likely to occur in biological when compared with prosthetic reconstruction. There was no correlation between the incidence of other complications and the type of LSS technique. This suggests a role for improved approaches to reconstruction methods including bioprinting and bioresorbable devices.

Three-dimensional Printed Endoprosthesis for Reconstruction of the Distal Tibia and Ankle Joint After Tumor Resection

Below-knee amputation is the treatment of choice for distal tibia malignancies, considering the specific anatomic features of the distal leg and ankle. However, advances in imaging modalities and adjuvant therapies and improved surgical techniques have made limb salvage surgery increasingly possible. The distal tibia is an uncommon location for malignant bone tumors, and there is limited information about limb salvage and reconstruction. Currently, 3-dimensional printed implants may successfully address reconstruction challenges after tumor resection. We present a patient with high-grade osteosarcoma of the distal tibia who underwent limb salvage and distal tibia and ankle joint replacement with a 3-dimensional printed endoprosthesis. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):e348-e352.].

Comparable outcomes of recycled autografts and allografts for reconstructions in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective, single-centre study compares the clinical and radiographic outcomes of limb reconstruction using recycled autografts to that using allografts.

METHODS

Patients with histopathologically verified high-grade osteosarcoma treated with wide bone resection and limb reconstruction using allografts or recycled autografts from January 1998 through December 2012 were retrospectively screened for enrolment eligibility. The final study cohort included 255 patients (allograft, 91; recycled autograft, 164). Data regarding post-operative complications, salvage treatment, and graft survival were collected. A modified International Society of Limb Salvage classification system was used to evaluate the radiographic findings.

RESULTS

The time to graft-host union did not differ significantly between the two graft types. Patients receiving recycled autografts had fewer complications compared than did those receiving allografts (recycled autografts vs. allograft: structural failure, 4.3 vs. 13.2%; late infection, 2.4 vs. 7.7%; all p < 0.05). Complications occurred most frequently during the first three years after surgery, and the majority were manageable. The five year limb survival rate did not differ significantly between the two graft types (91.3 vs. 94.0%; p = 0.752). No local oncological recurrence was observed within the recycled autografts.

CONCLUSION

Recycled autografts and allografts are feasible options for biological limb reconstructions in terms of complications and graft survival after wide resection of osteosarcoma.

Plate-assisted bone segment transport: Novel application on distal tibia defect after tumour resection. A case report

Introduction

Reconstruction of a large bone defect of the distal tibia after limb salvage surgery is difficult. The options include custom-made ankle endoprosthetic replacement, arthrodesis, and biological or metallic intercalary reconstructions. This report introduces a technique that provides the patient with a long-lasting biological reconstruction while preserving the native ankle.

Presentation of case

We present the case of a 47-year-old man with osteosarcoma of the distal tibia. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, wide excision was performed while preserving the ankle joint. Bone reconstruction by Plate-assisted bone segment transport (PABST) was performed with a non-invasive growing intramedullary nail. At 34 months of follow-up, there was solid union and the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score was 26/30.

Discussion

This is the first report of PABST after distal tibia tumour resection. It shows that this is a viable and safe method of reconstruction. Despite the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, regenerate was formed and union was achieved.

Conclusion

PABST is a useful tool in the armamentarium to tackle difficult large bone defects.

•

Large distal tibia bone defects are difficult to manage.

•

First report of Plate-assisted bone segment transport after distal tibia tumour resection

•

Regenerate was formed and bone union was achieved despite adjuvant chemotherapy.

•

Good outcome and function at 34 months of follow-up

•

Plate-assisted bone segment transport is a useful reconstructive technique.

Is double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis a reliable reconstruction for bone defect after distal tibia tumor resection?-a finite element study based on promising clinical outcomes

Background

There are different surgical methods for primary malignant tumor located at distal tibia. Previous studies have reported that double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis is an alternative option. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effect of double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis by finite element analysis (FEA).

Methods

Computer-aided design software was used to establish three-dimension models. Three different models were constructed: normal tibia-fibula-talus complex (model A), double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis (model B), and reconstruction by ipsilateral fibula (model C). We used FEA to evaluate and compare the biomechanical characteristics of these constructs. Simulated load of 600 N was applied to the tibial plateau to simulate balanced single-foot standing. Output results representing the model von Mises stress and displacement of the components were analyzed.

Results

Construct stiffness was increased when the internal plate fixation was used. For axial load, model B (1460.5 N/mm) was stiffer than the construct of model A (524.8 N/mm), and model C (636.6 N/mm), indicating model B was more stable. Maximum stress on the fibular graft occurred on the proximal end. The von Mises stress and stress distribution of fibular graft in model B (71.4 MPa) and model C (67.8 MPa) were similar. In model B, the ipsilateral fibula in model B has a higher value of stress (16.1 MPa) than that in model A (0.5 MPa), indicating the ipsilateral fibula shared load after fusion with talus.

Conclusions

Our computational findings suggest that double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis is an acceptable construct for distal tibia defect and the ipsilateral fibula shares load after fusion with talus.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02362-0.

Reconstructive Challenges of Distal Tibia Bone Tumors: Extracorporeally Irradiated Autograft Combined with a Nonvascularized Autograft Fibula for Superior Reconstruction and Functional Outcomes When Compared to Ipsilateral Pedicled Fibula Transfer Alone

Introduction

Traditionally, centralization of the fibula with fusion across the tibiotalar joint has been used to reconstruct distal tibial defects. Although effective, it requires long periods of protected weight-bearing. The fibula or the fixation often fails before fibular hypertrophy necessitating multiple additional surgeries. A method of using ECRT with the available ipsilateral fibula (nonvascularized) to reconstruct the distal tibia defect with the aim of early return to weight-bearing was evolved. This paper documents our early experience. Patients and Methods. Four patients; with the diagnosis of osteosarcoma in 3 patients and recurrent giant cell tumor of the bone in 1 patient, underwent resection of the distal tibia for tumors between 2017 and 2019. Extracorporeally irradiated (50 Gy) distal tibia along with ipsilateral nonvascularized fibula was used to bridge the defect and fuse the tibiotalar joint. A plate was used to rigidly hold the construct. The final outcome was compared to the historical control group that underwent only pedicled ipsilateral fibula transposition and ankle arthrodesis without recycled autograft or allograft between 2009 and 2017. Oncological reconstruction and functional outcomes were compared for each group. Patient reported outcomes on the acceptability of ankle fusion; cosmesis and function were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

Results

The mean resection length in the study group (4 patients) was 7.75 cm (7 to 8.5 cm). As compared to the historical cohort of 7 patients, the study population showed statistically superior results in all reconstruction, functional, and patient-reported outcomes except time to proximal junction union (p=0.068). There were no reconstruction failures, infection, or nonunions in the study group, whereas the control comparative group had 2 proximal junction nonunions and a mean time to fibular hypertrophy of 143 weeks (82 to 430 weeks) with fibula centralization. Earlier weight-bearing was allowed (mean 26.75 weeks; median 27 weeks) compared to (mean 80.75 weeks; median 80 weeks) in the control group.

Conclusion

We think that ECRT with ipsilateral vascularized fibula is a promising method of reconstructing the distal tibia. The recycled autograft tibia added strength to the distal tibia construct in our study and aided the anatomical reconstruction of the distal tibia. The patient-reported outcomes for cosmesis and acceptability add to the benefits of performing this procedure. Consistent early union across the proximal junction and earlier weight-bearing were clear advantages of this method.

Different reconstructive techniques for tumours of the distal tibia

AIMS

The aim of this study was to report the results of three forms of reconstruction for patients with a ditsl tibial bone tumour: an intercalary resection and reconstruction, an osteoarticular reconstruction, and arthrodesis of the ankle.

METHODS

A total of 73 patients with a median age of 19 years (interquartile range (IQR) 14 to 36) were included in this retrospective, multicentre study.

RESULTS

Reconstructions included intercalary resection in 17 patients, osteoarticular reconstruction in 11, and ankle arthrodesis in 45. The median follow-up was 77 months (IQR 35 to 130). Local recurrence occurred in eight patients after a median of 14 months (IQR 9 to 36), without a correlation with adequacy of margins or reconstructive technique. Major complications included fracture of the graft in ten patients, nonunion of the proximal osteotomy in seven, and infection in five. In the osteoarticular group, three of 11 patients developed radiological evidence of severe osteoarthritis, but only one was symptomatic and required conversion to ankle arthrodesis. Functional evaluation showed higher values of the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores in the intercalary group compared with the others.

CONCLUSION

Preservation of the epiphysis in patients with a distal tibial bone tumour is a safe and effective form of limb-sparing treatment. It requires rigorous preoperative planning after accurate analysis of the imaging. When joint-sparing resection is not indicated, ankle arthrodesis, either isolated tibiotalar or combined tibiotalar and subtalar arthrodesis, should be preferred over osteoarticular reconstruction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1567-1573.

Novel "double-strut" fibula ankle arthrodesis for large tumor-related bone defect of distal tibia

Background

Reconstruction for large bone defect of distal tibia after wide resection of tumor is difficult, and the best option remains controversial. This study presents a novel “double-strut” fibula ankle arthrodesis for this issue.

Methods

Nine patients with malignant or aggressive tumors of distal tibia underwent novel “double-strut” fibula ankle arthrodesis after wide tumor resection were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed the bone union time, complications and oncology outcome clinically and radiographically. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were used to evaluate the functional outcome.

Results

The average followup period was 53 ± 46 months. There was no deep infection or graft fracture observed in this series. Internal fixation loosening was found in one case. In these patients, eight achieved union at both proximal and distal junctions, while one achieved union only distally. The mean union time of the proximal junctions and distal junctions was 10.5 ± 1.6 months and 8.7 ± 2.3 months, respectively. The mean postoperative MSTS score was 83% ± 8%. The subscales of FAOS indicating the most problem was Sport and Recreation Function with a mean score of 18 ± 11. At the final follow-up, one of them (1/9, 11%) experienced local recurrence in soft tissue and received another resection surgery, and four (4/9, 44%) patients developed lung metastases.

Conclusions

For large bone defect of distal tibia, this novel “double-strut” fibula reconstruction can be a viable alternative, which is capable of achieving durable ankle fusion and functional salvaged limb with low rate of complications.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-019-2742-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Limb salvage for malignant bone tumours of distal tibia with dual ipsilateral vascularized autogenous fibular graft in a trapezoid-shaped array with ankle arthrodesis and preserving subtalar joint

BACKGROUND

The treatment of malignant tumours of the distal tibia is a challenging surgical problem due to the scarce soft tissue coverage and the instability of the ankle joint that often occurs after resection. However, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment for malignant tumours of the distal tibia.

METHODS

We report a new reconstruction for five patients with high-grade osteosarcoma of distal tibia, using dual ipsilateral vascularized autogenous fibular graft in a trapezoid-shaped array and external fixator, with ankle arthrodesis and preserving subtalar joints. The patients were examined clinically and radiographically.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 88 months. The mean wound healing time was 14 days. Bone healing was achieved for all the five patients at an average time of 7 months. There were no complications of mal-union, skin necrosis, post-operative infection, loss of internal fixation, peroneal nerve injury. One patient had a local recurrence, which required amputation 15 months postoperatively. The remaining four patients were able to walk with an average functional score of 81.25% according to MSTS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that this technique is safe and effective to perform implantation of dual ipsilateral vascularized autogenous fibular graft in a trapezoid-shaped array and preserving subtalar joints in terms of the distal tibial reconstruction for malignant bone tumour of the distal tibia. This reconstruction represents a biological alternative protocol for limb salvage in cases of malignant bone tumour of the distal tibia, with encouraging results and with the advantages of lower complications and accelerating recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Surgical treatment of primary malignant tumours of the distal tibia: clinical outcome and reconstructive strategies

AIMS

We retrospectively report our experience of managing 30 patients with a primary malignant tumour of the distal tibia; 25 were treated by limb salvage surgery and five by amputation. We compared the clinical outcomes of following the use of different methods of reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

There were 19 male and 11 female patients. The mean age of the patients was 19 years (6 to 59) and the mean follow-up was 5.1 years (1.25 to 12.58). Massive allograft was used in 11 patients, and autograft was used in 14 patients. The time to union, the survival time of the reconstruction, complication rate, and functional outcomes following the different surgical techniques were compared. The overall patient survival was also recorded.

RESULTS

Out of 14 patients treated with an autograft, 12 (86%) achieved union at both the proximal and distal junctions. The time to union at both junctions of the autograft was significantly shorter than in those treated with an allograft (11.1 vs 17.2 months, p = 0.02; 9.5 vs 16.2 months, p = 0.04). The complication rate of allograft reconstruction was 55%. The five patients treated with an amputation did not have a complication. Out of the 25 patients who were treated with limb salvage, three (12%) developed local recurrence and underwent amputation. The mean functional Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score after autograft reconstruction was higher than after allograft reconstruction (81% vs 67%; p = 0.06), and similar to that after amputation (81% vs 82%; p = 0.82). The two- and five-year overall rates of survival were 83% and 70%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This consecutive case series supports the safety of limb salvage and the effectiveness of biological reconstruction after the resection of a primary tumour of the distal tibia. Autograft might be a preferable option. In some circumstances, below-knee amputation remains a valid option.

Surgical options and reconstruction strategies for primary bone tumors of distal tibia: A systematic review of complications and functional outcome

Background

Primary malignant or aggressive benign bone tumors rarely occur in distal tibia, and limb salvage remains the mainstay of surgical options. However, reconstruction methods for large bone defect after wide tumor resection in this location are debatable. The purpose of this systematical review is to critically evaluate each reconstruction method regarding the postoperative complications and functional outcome.

Methods

A systematic review of the 33 studies including 337 cases with tumors affecting distal tibia was performed after searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Pooled descriptive statistics with separate analyses for postoperative complications and functional outcome of different reconstruction options were performed.

Results

290 (86.1%) patients received limb salvage procedures. Reconstruction strategies including biological reconstruction, such as autograft, allograft, distraction osteogenesis and non-biological prosthetic replacement. The patients received limb salvage procedures tended to have a higher MSTS score (77.1% vs 70.9%, P = .055) and a higher incidence of local relapse (28/290 vs 0/47, P = .052) than those amputated. Biological reconstruction methods provided better functional outcome (78.4% vs 72.2%, P = .017) compared with non-biological prosthetic reconstruction, although similarity of incidence of major complications (51/253 vs 12/37, P = .091). With respect to the comparison between autograft and allograft reconstruction, the autograft seemed to have less major postoperative complications occurrence (27/165 vs 22/78, P = .032), and consequently better functional outcome (MSTS score, 80.2% vs 74.3%, P = .025) than allograft reconstruction.

Conclusions

Limb salvage results in better functional outcome compared with amputation. Biological reconstruction is more advocated than prosthetics replacement, and furthermore, autograft might be suggested to be the optimal reconstructive method with regard to better postoperative functional outcome and less major complications.

Reconstruction of bone defect with allograft and retrograde intramedullary nail for distal tibia osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effectiveness of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde nail and allograft in limb salvage surgery for patients with distal tibia osteosarcoma.

METHODS

5 patients diagnosed as distal tibia osteosarcoma underwent ankle arthrodesis with a retrograde nail in our hospital. During the follow-up, radiographic views of the ankle joint were taken in two planes to assess bone healing and axis alignment. Other measurements of outcomes included procedure-related complications, local recurrence, and metastasis. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients, including 4 cases of mild subcutaneous fluid and 1 case of screw breakage. All patients showed stable ankle and could stand or walk with the assistance of crutch before the complete union between allograft and host bone. One patient died due to multiple bone and pulmonary metastasis at 1 year after surgery. As for the other 4 patients, they were followed-up regularly for a mean period of 42 months. No local recurrence or distant metastasis occurred in any of these four patients. All the 4 patients expressed satisfaction with the outcome. According to MSTS scale, the mean postoperative functional score was 74.3%±4.4% (range, 70%-81%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary retrograde nail for distal tibia osteosarcoma could produce a satisfactory outcome in terms of functional results and complications. Excellent stabilization of the ankle joint can be achieved through this technique, as it allows patients to perform much earlier postoperative weight-bearing exercise.

Outcome of bone recycling using liquid nitrogen as bone reconstruction procedure in malignant and recurrent benign aggressive bone tumour of distal tibia: A report of four cases

Amputation still considered as primary choice of malignancy treatment in distal tibia. Bone recycling with liquid nitrogen for reconstruction following resection of malignant bone tumours offers many advantages. We presented four patients with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, adamantinoma and recurrent giant cell tumour over distal tibia. All of the patients underwent wide excision and bone recycling using liquid nitrogen as bone reconstruction. The mean functional Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 75% with no infection and local recurrent. The reconstruction provides good local control and functional outcome.

Reconstruction of the distal tibia following resection of aggressive bone tumours using a custom-made megaprosthesis

OBJECTIVE

Largest, single-centre study of clinical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) for aggressive distal tibial bone tumours.

METHOD

Retrospective observational study of eight patients was undertaken.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 77 months (range 13-276). Cumulative five and ten year survival was 63% and 42% respectively. Three patients developed either disease recurrence or metastases post-surgery. One patient developed deep infection requiring washout and suppressive antibiotics. No patients required revision surgery. The median MSTS score at last follow up was 66%.

CONCLUSIONS

EPR of the distal tibia is a viable option and provides good function outcomes.

Is Limb Salvage With Microwave-induced Hyperthermia Better Than Amputation for Osteosarcoma of the Distal Tibia?

BACKGROUND

Amputation has been the standard surgical treatment for distal tibia osteosarcoma owing to its unique anatomic features. Preliminary research suggested that microwave-induced hyperthermia may have a role in treating osteosarcoma in some locations of the body (such as the pelvis), but to our knowledge, no comparative study has evaluated its efficacy in a difficult-to-treat location like the distal tibia.

QUESTIONS

Does microwave-induced hyperthermia result in (1) improved survival, (2) decreased local recurrence, (3) improved Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, or (4) fewer complications than amputation in patients with a distal tibial osteosarcoma?

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2015, we treated 79 patients for a distal tibia osteosarcoma without metastases. Of those, 52 were treated with microwave-induced hyperthermia, and 27 with amputation. Patients were considered eligible for microwave-induced hyperthermia if they had an at least 20-mm available distance from the tumor edge to the articular surface, good clinical and imaging response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and no pathologic fracture. Patients not meeting these indications were treated with amputation. In addition, if neither the posterior tibial artery nor the dorsalis pedis artery was salvageable, the patients were treated with amputation and were not included in any group in this study. A total of 13 other patients were treated with conventional limb-salvage resections and reconstructions (at the request of the patient, based on patient preference) and were not included in this study. All 79 patients in this retrospective study were available for followup at a minimum of 12 months (mean followup in the hyperthermia group, 79 months, range 12-158 months; mean followup in the amputation group, 95 months, range, 15-142 months). With the numbers available, the groups were no different in terms of sex, age, tumor grade, tumor stage, or tumor size. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a probability less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Survival to death was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Complications were recorded from the patients' files and graded using the classification of surgical complications described by Dindo et al.

RESULTS

In the limb-salvage group, Kaplan Meier survival at 6 years was 80% (95% CI, 63%-90%), and this was not different with the numbers available from survivorship in the amputation group at 6 years (70%; 95% CI, 37%-90%; p = 0.301).With the numbers available, we found no difference in local recurrence (six versus 0; p = 0.066). However mean ± SD MSTS functional scores were higher in patients who had microwave-induced hyperthermia compared with those who had amputations (85% ± 6% versus 66% ± 5%; p = 0.008).With the numbers available, we found no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing complications between the two groups (six of 52 [12%] versus three of 27 [11%]; p = 0.954).

CONCLUSIONS

We were encouraged to find no early differences in survival, local recurrence, or serious complications between microwave-induced hyperthermia and amputation, and a functional advantage in favor of microwave-induced hyperthermia. However, these findings should be replicated in larger studies with longer mean duration of followup, and in studies that compare microwave-induced hyperthermia with conventional limb-sparing approaches.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Structural allograft reconstruction of the foot and ankle after tumor resections

BACKGROUND

Structural allografts have been used to correct deformities or to fill bone defects secondary to tumor excisions, trauma, osteochondral lesions, or intercalary arthrodesis. However, the quality of published evidence supporting the use of allograft transplantation in foot and ankle surgery has been reported as fair. The purpose of this study was to report the overall survival of structural allograft in the foot and ankle after tumor resection, and the survival according to the type of allograft and the complication rates in the medium to long term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1989 to June 2011, 44 structural allograft reconstructions of the foot and ankle were performed in 42 patients (28 men and 14 women) due to musculoskeletal tumor resections. Mean age at presentation was 27 years. Mean follow-up was 53 months. Demographic data, diagnosis, site of the neoplasm, operations performed, operative complications, outcomes after surgery, date of last follow-up evaluation, and local recurrences were reviewed for all patients. Regarding the type of 44 allograft reconstructions, 16 were hemicylindrical allografts (HA), 12 intercalary allografts (IA), 10 osteoarticular allografts (OA), and 6 were total calcaneal allograft (CA).

RESULTS

The overall allograft survival rate, as calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, at 5 and 10 years was 79 % (95 % CI 64-93 %). When allocated by type of allograft reconstruction the specific allograft survival at 5 and 10 years was: 83 % for CA, 80 % for HA, 77 % for OA, and 75 % for IA. The complications rate for this series was 36 % including: articular failure, local recurrence, infection, fracture and nonunion.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that structural allograft reconstruction in the foot and ankle after tumor resection may be durable with a 79 % survival rate at 5 and 10 years. The two types of allografts that showed better survival rate were hemicylindrical allografts (80 %) and calcaneus allografts (83 %). The highest complication rates occurred after calcaneus allografts and osteoarticular allografts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Reconstruction with pasteurized autograft for primary malignant bone tumor of distal tibia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the specific protocol for the treatment of primary malignant bone tumors of distal tibiae in a group of patients for limb salvage, with wide "en bloc" intra-articular excision and reconstruction of the defect with recycled pasteurized autograft, which was stabilized using an internal fixator.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2009, ten patients (three females and seven males) at a mean age of 26.5 years old were treated for malignant bone tumors of the distal tibiae with "en bloc" intra-articular excision and ankle arthrodesis using recycled pasteurized autograft. Nine cases were histopathologically diagnosed as high-grade osteosarcoma, and one case as invasive osteoblastoma. All bone tumors were staged according to Enneking's criteria with two stages IIA cases, and eight stages IIB cases.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 81 months, the mean postoperative functional score was 74.3%. All the patients had bony union at the last follow-up. Six patients required secondary iliac crest cancellous bone grafting at the proximal end to achieve union. The mean time for graft union was 18.9 months, and the average union time of the proximal junctions was longer than that of the distal junctions. Superficial infection occurred in two patients (20.0%), which were resolved by changing dress. There was no deep infection or graft fracture during the entire procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of pasteurized bone graft for primary malignant bone tumors of distal tibia indicated a satisfactory outcome, with regard to graft survival, complications, and functional results. A pasteurized auto-graft can be an easily accessible and economical alternative of high efficiency for the usual reconstruction modalities.

Similar survival but better function for patients after limb salvage versus amputation for distal tibia osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Amputation has been the standard surgical treatment for distal tibia osteosarcoma. Advances in surgery and chemotherapy have made limb salvage possible. However, it is unclear whether limb salvage offers any improvement in function without compromising survival.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore compared the survival, local recurrence, function, and complications of patients with distal tibia osteosarcoma treated with limb salvage or amputation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients with distal tibia osteosarcoma treated from 1985 to 2010. Nineteen patients had amputations and 23 had limb salvage and allograft reconstructions. We graded the histology using Broders classification, and staged patients using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) systems. The tumor grades tended to be higher in the group of patients who had amputations. We determined survival, local recurrence, MSTS function, and complications. The minimum followup was 8 months (median, 60 months; range, 8-288 months).

RESULTS

The survival of patients who had limb salvage was similar to that of patients who had amputations: 84% at 120 and 240 months versus 74%, respectively. The incidence of local recurrence was similar: three of 23 patients who had limb salvage versus no patients who had amputations. The mean MSTS functional score tended to be higher in patients who had limb salvage compared with those who had amputations: 76% (range, 30%-93%) versus 71% (range, 50%-87%), respectively. The incidence of complications was similar.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with either limb salvage or amputation experience similar survival, local recurrence, and complications, but better function is achievable for patients treated with limb salvage versus amputation. Local recurrence and complications are more common in patients with limb salvage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical management and surgical treatment of distal fibular tumours: a case series and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Study reports clinical and functional outcomes of surgical treatment in a case series of nine patients with distal fibular tumours.

METHODS

Nine patients with distal fibular tumours were observed between 2005 and 2010. A PubMed search was performed using the terms "fibula", "lower limb tumour [cancer]", "sarcoma", "Ewing", "peroneal", "fibular metastasis", and "limb-salvage surgery".

RESULTS

In all our patients, lesions were unilateral. All patients complained of pain; limping was present in 5 of 9 tumours. Patients were managed surgically, except one who underwent local radiotherapy. In six patients, a benign or tumor-like lesion was detected. Malignancies consisted of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (two cases) or multifocal mesenchymal cancer (one case). Non-malignant lesions were treated by curettage and filling, followed by internal fixation when needed. In malignant or locally aggressive lesions, metadiaphyseal fibular resection was performed. The literature search retrieved either case reports or small case series, reflecting the rarity of distal fibular tumours. Surgical treatment was successful in all patients with benign lesions, whereas the rate of success was 40-100 % in case of malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the low incidence of distal fibular tumours, controversies exist about the optimal surgical management. Clinical observation and imaging should be reserved to asymptomatic benign lesions. In non-malignant tumours causing pain, limping, and pathological fractures; in malignancies, surgery is recommended. Finally, in patients with asymptomatic lesions of uncertain nature, biopsy and histological examination should be performed to plan appropriate management.

Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal tibia and ankle joint after resection of primary bone tumours

Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint for a primary bone tumour is a rarely attempted and technically challenging procedure. We report the outcome of six patients treated between 1981 and 2007. There were four males and two females, with a mean age of 43.5 years (15 to 75), and a mean follow-up of 9.6 years (1 to 27). No patient developed a local recurrence or metastasis. Two of the six went on to have a below-knee amputation for persistent infection after a mean 16 months (1 to 31). The four patients who retained their endoprosthesis had a mean musculoskeletal tumour society score of 70% and a mean Toronto extremity salvage score of 71%. All were pain free and able to perform most activities of daily living in comfort. A custom-made endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint is a viable treatment option for carefully selected patients with a primary bone tumour. Patients should, however, be informed of the risk of infection and the potential need for amputation if this cannot be controlled.

Reconstruction with pasteurized autograft for distal tibial tumor

INTRODUCTION

Primary malignant tumors of the distal tibia are rare. With advances in various treatment modalities, limb salvage for tumors of the distal tibia has been indicated for selected cases. This study examined whether the results of a pasteurized autologous bone graft are comparable to other reconstruction methods with regard to the graft survival and the functional outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1992 and 2003, nine patients with malignant tumors of the distal tibia were subjected to the reconstruction with a recycled pasteurized autograft. The ultimate graft survival, union time, complications, and functional results were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

One out of the nine autografts was removed after 15 months, due to non-union. Seven complications occurred in six patients, which included superficial infections (two cases), deep infections (one case), non-union (two cases), and fracture (two cases). None of the patients required a secondary below the knee amputation during the follow-up period. The average musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) functional score was 26/30 (86.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The reconstruction with a pasteurized autograft is a simple and easily method for treating distal tibial malignancies. Moreover, vascularized fibula transfer might be considered a good ancillary procedure for resolving graft-related complications.