Relationship between joint gap difference and range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study between different platforms

Predictive Gap-balancing Reduces the Extent of Soft-tissue Adjustment Required After Bony Resection in Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Comparison With Simulated Measured Resection

Background

To understand the extent and frequency of soft-tissue adjustment required to achieve mediolateral (ML) balance in measured resection (MR) vs gap-balancing (GB) total knee arthroplasty, this study compared ML balance and joint laxity throughout flexion between the 2 techniques. The precision of predictive GB in achieving ML balance and laxity was also assessed.

Methods

Two surgeons performed 95 robot-assisted GB total knee arthroplasties with predictive balancing, limiting tibial varus to 3° and adjusting femoral positioning to optimize balance. A robotic ligament tensioner measured joint laxity. Planned MR (pMR) was simulated by applying neutral tibial and femoral coronal resections and 3° of external femoral rotation. ML balance, laxity, component alignment, and resection depths were compared between planned GB (pGB) and pMR. ML balance and laxity were compared between pGB and final GB (fGB).

Results

The proportion of knees with >2 mm of ML imbalance in flexion or extension ranged from 3% to 18% for pGB vs 50% to 53% for pMR (P < .001). Rates of ML imbalance >3 mm ranged from 0% to 9% for pGB and 30% to 38% for MR (P < .001). The mean pMR laxity was 1.9 mm tighter medially and 1.1 mm tighter laterally than pGB throughout flexion. The mean fGB laxity was greater than the mean pGB laxity by 0.5 mm medially and 1.2 mm laterally (P < .001).

Conclusion

MR led to tighter joints than GB, with ML gap imbalances >3 mm in 30% of knees. GB planning improved ML balance throughout flexion but increased femoral posterior rotation variability and bone resection compared to MR. fGB laxity was likely not clinically significantly different than pGB.

Arthroplasty Surgeons Differ in Their Intraoperative Soft Tissue Assessments: A Study in Human Cadavers to Quantify Surgical Decision-making in TKA

BACKGROUND

In TKA, soft tissue balancing is assessed through manual intraoperative trialing. This assessment is a physical examination via manually applied forces at the ankle, generating varus and valgus moments at the knee while the surgeon visualizes the lateral and medial gaps at the joint line. Based on this examination, important surgical decisions are made that influence knee stability, such as choosing the polyethylene insert thickness. Yet, the applied forces and the assessed gaps in this examination represent a qualitative art that relies on each surgeon's intuition, experience, and training. Therefore, the extent of variation among surgeons in conducting this exam, in terms of applied loads and assessed gaps, is unknown. Moreover, whether variability in the applied loads yields different surgical decisions, such as choice of insert thickness, is also unclear. Thus, surgeons and developers have no basis for deciding to what extent the applied loads need to be standardized and controlled during a knee balance exam in TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do the applied moments in soft tissue assessment differ among surgeons? (2) Do the assessed gaps in soft tissue assessment differ among surgeons? (3) Is the choice of insert thickness associated with the applied moments?

METHODS

Seven independent human cadaveric nonarthritic lower extremities from pelvis to toe were acquired (including five females and two males with a mean age of 73 ± 7 years and a mean BMI of 25.8 ± 3.8 kg/m 2 ). Posterior cruciate ligament substituting (posterior stabilized) TKA was performed only on the right knees. Five fellowship-trained knee surgeons (with 24, 15, 15, 7, and 6 years of clinical experience) and one chief orthopaedic resident independently examined soft tissue balance in each knee in extension (0° of flexion), midflexion (30° of flexion), and flexion (90° of flexion) and selected a polyethylene insert based on their assessment. Pliable force sensors were wrapped around the leg to measure the loads applied by each surgeon. A three-dimensional (3D) motion capture system was used to measure knee kinematics and a dynamic analysis software was used to estimate the medial and lateral gaps. We assessed (1) whether surgeons applied different moments by comparing the mean applied moment by surgeons in extension, midflexion, and flexion using repeated measures (RM)-ANOVA (p < 0.05 was assumed significantly different); (2) whether surgeons assessed different gaps by comparing the mean medial and lateral gaps in extension, midflexion, and flexion using RM-ANOVA (p < 0.05 was assumed significantly different); and (3) whether the applied moments in extension, midflexion, and flexion were associated with the insert thickness choice using a generalized estimating equation (p < 0.05 was assumed a significant association).

RESULTS

The applied moments differed among surgeons, with the largest mean differences occurring in varus in midflexion (16.5 Nm; p = 0.02) and flexion (7.9 Nm; p < 0.001). The measured gaps differed among surgeons at all flexion angles, with the largest mean difference occurring in flexion (1.1 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.001). In all knees except one, the choice of insert thickness varied by l mm among surgeons. The choice of insert thickness was weakly associated with the applied moments in varus (β = -0.06 ± 0.02 [95% confidence interval -0.11 to -0.01]; p = 0.03) and valgus (β = -0.09 ± 0.03 [95% CI -0.18 to -0.01]; p= 0.03) in extension and in varus in flexion (β = -0.11 ± 0.04 [95% CI -0.22 to 0.00]; p = 0.04). To put our findings in context, the greatest regression coefficient (β = -0.11) indicates that for every 9-Nm increase in the applied varus moment (that is, 22 N of force applied to the foot assuming a shank length of 0.4 m), the choice of insert thickness decreased by 1 mm.

CONCLUSION

In TKA soft tissue assessment in a human cadaver model, five surgeons and one chief resident applied different moments in midflexion and flexion and targeted different gaps in extension, midflexion, and flexion. A weak association between the applied moments in extension and flexion and the insert choice was observed. Our results indicate that in the manual assessment of soft tissue, changes in the applied moments of 9 and 11 Nm (22 to 27 N on the surgeons' hands) in flexion and extension, respectively, yielded at least a 1-mm change in choice of insert thickness. The choice of insert thickness may be more sensitive to the applied moments in in vivo surgery because the surgeon is allowed a greater array of choices beyond insert thickness.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Among five arthroplasty surgeons with different levels of experience and a chief resident, subjective soft tissue assessment yielded 1 to 2 mm of variation in their choice of insert thickness. Therefore, developers of tools to standardize soft tissue assessment in TKA should consider controlling the force applied by the surgeon to better control for variations in insert selection.

Improved total knee arthroplasty pain outcome when joint gap targets are achieved throughout flexion

PURPOSE

Achieving a balanced knee is accepted as an important goal in total knee arthroplasty; however, the definition of ideal balance remains controversial. This study therefore endeavoured to determine: (1) whether medio-lateral gap balance in extension, midflexion, and flexion are associated with improved outcome scores at one-year post-operatively and (2) whether these relationships can be used to identify windows of optimal gap balance throughout flexion.

METHODS

135 patients were enrolled in a multicenter, multi-surgeon, prospective investigation using a robot-assisted surgical platform and posterior cruciate ligament sacrificing gap balancing technique. Joint gaps were measured under a controlled tension of 70-90 N from 10°-90° flexion. Linear correlations between joint gaps and one-year KOOS outcomes were investigated. KOOS Pain and Activities of Daily Living sub-scores were used to define clinically relevant joint gap target thresholds in extension, midflexion, and flexion. Gap thresholds were then combined to investigate the synergistic effects of satisfying multiple targets.

RESULTS

Significant linear correlations were found throughout extension, midflexion, and flexion. Joint gap thresholds of an equally balanced or tighter medial compartment in extension, medial laxity ± 1 mm compared to the final insert thickness in midflexion, and a medio-lateral imbalance of less than 1.5 mm in flexion generated subgroups that reported significantly improved KOOS pain scores at one year (median ∆ = 8.3, 5.6 and 2.8 points, respectively). Combining any two targets resulted in further improved outcomes, with the greatest improvement observed when all three targets were satisfied (median ∆ = 11.2, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Gap thresholds identified in this study provide clinically relevant and achievable targets for optimising soft tissue balance in posterior cruciate ligament sacrificing gap balancing total knee arthroplasty. When all three balance windows were achieved, clinically meaningful pain improvement was observed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing mobile-bearing with fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of all-cause revision rates, aspetic loosening, knee functional scores, range of motion and radiographic lucent lines and osteolysis.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Web of Science were searched up to January 2020. Randomized controlled trials that compared primary mobile-bearing with fixed-bearing TKA, reporting at least one of the outcomes of interest, at a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. All outcomes of interest were pooled at short-term (< 5 years), mid-term (5 to 9 years) and long-term (> = 10 years) follow-up intervals.

Results

A total of 70 eligible articles were included in the qualitative and statistical analyses. There was no difference between mobile-bearing or fixed-bearing TKA at short-term, mid-term and long-term follow-ups in all outcome measures including all-cause revision rate, aseptic loosening, oxford knee score, knee society score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, maximum knee flexion, radiographic lucent lines and radiographic osteolysis.

Conclusion

The current level of evidence demonstrated that both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs achieved excellent outcomes, yet it does not prove the theoretical advantages of the mobile-bearing insert over its fixed-bearing counterpart. The use of either design could therefore be supported based on the outcomes assessed in this study.

Level of Evidence: Level II, Therapeutic

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1007/s00590-021-02999-x).

Surgical procedures for the prevention of extension-flexion gap imbalance in total knee arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative and intraoperative factors that influence extension-flexion gap imbalance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Ninety-three knees undergoing TKA with the modified gap balancing technique were included. Preoperative range of motion, intraoperative extension-flexion gap balance, thickness of the resected bone and radiological parameters were investigated. The preoperative flexion contracture, bone resection thickness in the medial proximal tibia, and the medial distal femur all correlated with the extension-flexion gap balance in TKA. Bone resection thickness in the medial proximal tibia and the medial distal femur were predictive of extension-flexion imbalance.

Soft-Tissue Balancing Technology for Total Knee Arthroplasty

» Improperly balanced total knee arthroplasties are at increased risk for complications including residual pain and/or instability, which are often corrected by a revision surgical procedure. » Because of the morbidity and financial burden associated with revision total knee arthroplasty, different technological applications, such as tibial insert sensors and computer-assisted gap balancing, are being used to assist with soft-tissue balancing during primary total knee arthroplasty. » Computer-assisted gap balancing increases the accuracy of mechanical alignment and improves the precision of balancing flexion and extension gaps during total knee arthroplasty. It is unclear whether this translates to improved short-term or long-term outcome measures. Considerations of this technology include increased cost, increased operative time, and a steep learning curve. » Intraoperative sensors increase the accuracy of balancing by quantifying the mediolateral intercompartmental load distribution through the range of motion, which may lead to improved outcome scores, patient satisfaction, higher activity levels, and decreased pain. The advantages of this technology compared with computer assistance include decreased cost and no disruption of operative time or workflow. Limited availability with constrained implants, limited implant choices, and a lack of long-term follow-up data have reduced utilization of intraoperative sensors. » Computer-assisted gap balancing and intraoperative sensors are not yet universally accepted, and the cost-benefit ratio associated with their use remains a consideration in today’s cost-conscious health-care environment. Future research should focus on longer-term follow-up to evaluate implant survivorship, cost-effectiveness, and clinical outcomes.

Functional Flexion Instability After Rotating-Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We sought to define "at risk" loading conditions associated with rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty (TKA-RP) implants that predispose to insert subluxation and spinout and to quantify tolerances for flexion-extension gap asymmetry and laxity in order to prevent these adverse events.

METHODS

Biomechanical testing was performed on 6 fresh-frozen cadaveric limbs with a TKA-RP implant with use of a gap-balancing technique, followed by sequential femoral component revision with variable-thickness polyethylene inserts to systematically represent 5 flexion-extension mismatch and asymmetry conditions. Each configuration was subjected to mechanical loading at 0°, 30°, and 60°. Rotational displacement of the insert on the tibial baseplate, lateral compartment separation, and insert concavity depth were measured with use of a digital caliper. Yield torque, a surrogate for ease of insert rotation and escape of the femoral component, was calculated with use of custom MATLAB code.

RESULTS

Design-intended insert rotation decreased with increasing knee flexion angles in each loading configuration. Likewise, yield torque increased with increasing joint flexion and decreased with increasing joint laxity in all testing configurations. Insert instability and femoral condyle displacement were reproduced in positions of increasing knee flexion and asymmetrical flexion gap laxity. The depth of lateral polyethylene insert concavity determined femoral condylar capture and defined a narrow tolerance of <2 mm in the smallest implant sizes for flexion gap asymmetry leading to rotational insert instability.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased femoral-tibial articular surface conformity with increasing knee flexion and asymmetrical flexion gap laxity enable paradoxical motion of the femoral component on the upper insert surface rather than the undersurface, as designed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Mobile-bearing TKA-RP is a technically demanding procedure requiring a snug symmetrical flexion gap. As little as 2 mm of asymmetrical lateral flexion laxity can result in decreased conformity, condyle liftoff, and insert subluxation. Flexion beyond 30° decreases bearing surface contact area and predisposes to reduced insert rotation and mechanical malfunction.

Load imbalances existed as determined by a sensor after conventional gap balancing with a tensiometer in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate intercompartmental load intraoperatively with a sensor after conventional gap balancing with a tensiometer during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Fifty sensor-assisted TKA procedures were performed prospectively between August and September 2018 with a cruciate-retaining prosthesis. After applying a modified measured resection technique, conventional balancing between resected surfaces was achieved. The equal and rectangular flexion-extension gaps were confirmed using a tensiometer at 90° and 5°-7° (due to posterior tibial slope) of knee flexion. Then, the load distribution was evaluated intraoperatively with a sensor placed on trial implants in the positions of knee flexion (90° flexion) and extension (10° flexion).

RESULTS

The proportion of coronal load imbalance (medial load - lateral load ≥  ± 15 lb) was 56% in extension and 32% in flexion (p = 0.023). The proportion of sagittal load imbalance (extension load - flexion load ≥  ± 15 lb) was 36% in the medial compartment and 4% in the lateral compartment (p < 0.001). An additional procedure for load balancing was performed in 74% of knees.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronal and sagittal load imbalances existed as determined by the sensor even after the achievement of appropriate conventional gap balance. The additional rebalancing procedure was performed for balanced loads in 74% of the knees after conventional balancing. The use of an intraoperative load sensor offers the advantage of direct evaluation of the load on TKA implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical outcome of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using an increased flexion gap in patients with preoperative stiffness

AIMS

To compare patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with ≤ 80° range of movement (ROM) operated with a 2 mm increase in the flexion gap with matched non-stiff patients with at least 100° of preoperative ROM and balanced flexion and extension gaps.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, 98 TKAs (91 patients) with a preoperative ROM of ≤ 80° were examined. Mean follow-up time was 53 months (24 to 112). All TKAs in stiff knees were performed with a 2 mm increased flexion gap. Data were compared to a matched control group of 98 TKAs (86 patients) with a mean follow-up of 43 months (24 to 89). Knees in the control group had a preoperative ROM of at least 100° and balanced flexion and extension gaps. In all stiff and non-stiff knees posterior stabilized (PS) TKAs with patellar resurfacing in combination with adequate soft tissue balancing were used.

RESULTS

Overall mean ROM in stiff knees increased preoperatively from 67° (0° to 80°) to 114° postoperatively (65° to 135°) (p < 0.001). Mean knee flexion improved from 82° (0° to 110°) to 115° (65° to 135°) and mean flexion contracture decreased from 14° (0° to 50°) to 1° (0° to 10°) (p < 0.001). The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) improved from 34 (0 to 71) to 88 (38 to 100) (p < 0.001) and the KSS Functional Score from 43 (0 to 70) to 86 (0 to 100). Seven knees (7%) required manipulations under anaesthesia (MUA) and none of the knees had flexion instability. The mean overall ROM in the control group improved from 117° (100° to 140°) to 123° (100° to 130°) (p < 0.001). Mean knee flexion improved from 119° (100° to 140°) to 123° (100° to 130°) (p < 0.001) and mean flexion contracture decreased from 2° (0° to 15°) to 0° (0° to 5°) (p < 0.001). None of the knees in the control group had flexion instability or required MUA. The mean KSS Knee Score improved from 48 (0 to 80) to 94 (79 to 100) (p < 0.001) and the KSS Functional Score from 52 (5 to 100) to 95 (60 to 100) (p < 0.001). Mean improvement in ROM (p < 0.001) and KSS Knee Score (p = 0.017) were greater in knees with preoperative stiffness compared with the control group, but the KSS Functional Score improvement was comparable (p = 0.885).

CONCLUSION

TKA with a 2 mm increased flexion gap provided a significant improvement of ROM in knees with preoperative stiffness. While the improvement in ROM was greater, the absolute postoperative ROM was less than in matched non-stiff knees. PS TKA with patellar resurfacing and a 2 mm increased flexion gap, in combination with adequate soft tissue balancing, provides excellent ROM and knee function when stiffness of the knee had been present preoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):426-433.

Influence of Patellar Tilt Angle in Merchant View on Postoperative Range of Motion in Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Substituting Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

We investigated whether the patellar tilt angle influences the maximum knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed by using a posterior cruciate ligament-substituting (PS) fixed-bearing prosthesis in patients with relatively loose or tight flexion gap.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, we followed up 169 patients for at least 2 years after TKA using PS fixed-bearing prosthesis. The patients were divided into two groups according to the flexion gap value-calculated by subtracting the thickness of the final bearing from the flexion gap measured intraoperatively under 200-cN·m force after patellar reduction and insertion of the final femoral and tibial components-into a relatively tight group (group T; 3-6.5 mm) and a relatively loose group (group L; 7-11 mm). Patellar tilt angles and maximum non-weight-bearing active knee flexion angles were assessed postoperatively. Group T was further divided into subgroup Tn if the patellar tilt angle was < 5° and subgroup Tw if the angle was ≥ 5°. Pearson correlation test was used for the correlation analysis of the flexion gap, patellar tilt angle, and postoperative flexion range.

Results

The mean postoperative flexion was 137.3° in group T and 137.5° in group L. The mean patellar tilt angle was 6.5° in group T and 6.9° in group L. In group T, a strong negative correlation (r = -0.78, p < 0.05) was observed between the patellar tilt and postoperative flexion range. However, further analysis revealed that only the subgroup Tw showed a strong negative correlation (r = -0.76, p < 0.05). Significant correlations were not found in the subgroup Tn and group L.

Conclusions

In TKA where a relatively tight flexion gap (≤ 6.5 mm) is created because of concerns about postoperative flexion instability due to a loose flexion gap, the patellar tilt angle should be < 5° for maximal postoperative knee flexion.

Gap difference in navigated TKA: a measure of the imbalanced flexion-extension gap

Introduction: The success of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) hinges on balanced flexion-extension gaps. This paper aims to evaluate the correlation between imbalanced gaps and clinical outcomes, and hence help quantify the imbalanced gap in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: We studied 195 knees with an average follow-up of two years. Flexion-extension gaps were obtained from computer calculation upon cementation of implants in both flexion (90°) and extension. The gap difference (GD) was defined as the measured difference between the gaps in flexion and extension.

Results: At 2 years after surgery, the mean ROM in the balanced group, with GD less than or equal to 2 mm, was 115.1° ± 16.6° and the mean ROM in the imbalanced group was 116.7° ± 12.1°. This was not statistically significant with p-value 0.589. Balanced flexion-extension gaps also did not show significant difference in terms of mechanical alignment, with 0.29 ± 0.89 in the balanced group at 2 years, and 0.65 ± 1.51 in the imbalanced group with p-value 0.123. Balanced gaps however, were associated with improved outcomes in terms of physical functioning, bodily pain, social functioning, Oxford and Knee scores at 6 months and improved social functioning scores at 2 years.

Conclusions: Computer navigation is a useful tool for assessing the gap balance in TKA. Balanced flexion-extension gaps, with gap differences of less than or equal to 2 mm, is associated with improved clinical outcomes at 6 months.

Unsatisfactory clinical outcomes of second-generation mobile bearing floating platform total knee arthroplasty: comparing outcomes with fixed bearing after five years minimum

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze and compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of fixed bearing ultracongruent (UC) insert total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and mobile bearing (MB) floating platform TKA using the navigation-assisted gap balancing technique with a minimum follow-up of five years.

METHODS

The study retrospectively enrolled 105 patients who received the UC type fixed bearing insert (group 1) and 95 patients who received the floating platform MB insert (group 2) during the period from August 2009 to June 2012. All surgery was performed using the navigation-assisted gap balancing technique. For strict assessment of gap measurements, the offset-type-force-controlled-spreader-system was used. Radiologic and clinical outcomes were assessed before operation and at the most recent follow-up using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. For statistical analysis, paired sample t tests were used. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Although the radiologic alignments were satisfactory for both groups (99/105 [94%] cases were neutral for group 1 and 90/95 [94%] for group 2), the functional and total WOMAC scores were inferior in group 2 (p < 0.05). There were two cases of insert breakage in group 2 that required bearing exchange. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship rates for groups 1 and 2 at 77 months were 100.0 and 97.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Second-generation MB floating platform TKA cases did not have satisfactory outcomes. There were two cases of insert breakage, which required bearing exchange. Other patients who underwent surgery with second-generation MB floating platform were encouraged to avoid high knee flexion activities, resulting in lower clinical performance.

Joint Gap in Mid-Flexion Is Not a Predictor of Postoperative Flexion Angle After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Postoperative knee flexion angle is one of the most important outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intraoperative ligament balancing may affect the postoperative range of motion of the knee. However, the relationship between intraoperative ligament balancing and postoperative flexion angle was still controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative joint gap affects postoperative knee flexion angle or not.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter study of 246 knees with varus osteoarthritis undergoing a posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing TKA was performed. The joint gap before implantation and after implantation was measured. The joint gap after implantation was measured using a specially designed tensor device with the same shape of a total knee prosthesis at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 145° of flexion with the reduction of the patellofemoral joint. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of the flexion angle of the knee after the operation.

RESULTS

Predictors were identified in the following 3 categories: (1) preoperative flexion angle, (2) intraoperative flexion angle, and (3) joint gap looseness at 120° of flexion (joint gap after implantation at 120° of flexion - joint gap after implantation at 0° of flexion) (R = 0.472, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Flexion angle after TKA was not affected by the flexion joint gap looseness before implantation and the joint gap looseness after implantation from 30° to 90° of flexion. Surgeons should notice that joint gap looseness in mid-flexion range did not increase the postoperative knee flexion angle.

Surgical Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Measured Resection, Gap Balancing, and Hybrid

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is effective in managing end-stage degenerative joint disease. Achieving favorable clinical outcomes is predicated on proper implant alignment, sizing, and rotation as well as adequate soft-tissue balancing. Modern TKA implants are designed to address the fundamental needs of attaining stability in both flexion and extension and of optimizing patellar tracking. Measured resection and gap balancing are the two different techniques used to implant the TKA components used today. Both techniques have been validated as durable and successful, and each has unique advantages and disadvantages. A hybrid technique has been developed that combines the benefits of measured resection and gap balancing and minimizes the limitations associated with both techniques. This hybrid approach has the potential for achieving improved TKA kinematics and refined surgical technique.

Clinical outcome of increased flexion gap after total knee arthroplasty. Can controlled gap imbalance improve knee flexion?

PURPOSE

Increased range of motion (ROM) while maintaining joint stability is the goal of modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A biomechanical study has shown that small increases in flexion gap result in decreased tibiofemoral force beyond 90° flexion. The purpose of this paper was to investigate clinical implications of controlled increased flexion gap.

METHODS

Four hundred and four TKAs were allocated into one of two groups and analysed retrospectively. In the first group (n = 352), flexion gap exceeded extension gap by 2.5 mm, while in the second group (n = 52) flexion gap was equal to the extension gap. The procedures were performed from 2008 to 2012. The patients were reviewed 12 months postoperatively. Objective clinical results were assessed for ROM, mediolateral and sagittal stability. Patient-reported outcome measures were the WOMAC score and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12).

RESULTS

After categorizing postoperative flexion into three groups (poor < 90°, satisfactory 91°-119°, good ≥ 120°) significantly more patients in group 1 achieved satisfactory or good ROM (p = 0.006). Group 1 also showed a significantly higher mean FJS-12 (group 1: 73, group 2: 61, p = 0.02). The mean WOMAC score was 11 in the first and 14 in the second group (n.s.). Increase in flexion gap did not influence knee stability.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical relevance of this study is that a controlled flexion gap increase of 2.5 mm may have a positive effect on postoperative flexion and patient satisfaction after TKA. Neither knee stability in the coronal and sagittal planes nor complications were influenced by a controlled increase in flexion gap.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

For years, numerous studies have been performed to determine whether mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (MB-TKA) or fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (FB-TKA) is the preferential design in total knee arthroplasty. Reviews and meta-analyses on this subject have focused on a relatively small number of randomised controlled trials, possibly missing important results of smaller studies. The goal of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of all literature comparing MB-TKA and FB-TKA in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed in the PubMed database. All studies that compared MB-TKA with FB-TKA and looked at one of four theorised advantages (insert wear, signs of loosening, survival rate of the prosthesis and clinical outcome) were included.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 258 articles, of which 127 were included after the first screening. The included studies consisted of 9 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, 48 RCT's, 44 comparative studies, 10 reviews and 13 studies that examined patients who received bilateral TKA (one MB-TKA and one FB-TKA). Combining the results of all studies showed that almost all studies found no difference between MB-TKA and FB-TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when examining all different types of studies on MB-TKA and FB-TKA, the results of this review showed no difference in insert wear, risk of loosening, survivorship or clinical outcome. In daily practice, the choice between MB-TKA and FB-TKA should be based on the experience and judgment of the surgeon, since no clear differences are observed in the scientific literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[Research progress of larger flexion gap than extension gap in total knee arthroplasty]

Objective

To summarize the progress of larger flexion gap than extension gap in total knee arthro-plasty (TKA).

Methods

The domestic and foreign related literature about larger flexion gap than extension gap in TKA, and its impact factors, biomechanical and kinematic features, and clinical results were summarized.

Results

During TKA, to adjust the relations of flexion gap and extension gap is one of the key factors of successful operation. The biomechanical, kinematic, and clinical researches show that properly larger flexion gap than extension gap can improve both the postoperative knee range of motion and the satisfaction of patients, but does not affect the stability of the knee joint. However, there are also contrary findings. So adjustment of flexion gap and extension gap during TKA is still in dispute.

Conclusion

Larger flexion gap than extension gap in TKA is a new joint space theory, and long-term clinical efficacy, operation skills, and related complications still need further study.

Intraoperative joint gaps and mediolateral balance affect postoperative knee kinematics in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Adjusting joint gaps and establishing mediolateral (ML) soft tissue balance are considered essential interventions for better outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the relationship between intraoperative laxity measurements and weightbearing knee kinematics has not been well explored. This study aimed to quantify the effect of intraoperative joint gaps and ML soft tissue balance on postoperative knee kinematics in posterior-stabilized (PS)-TKA.

METHODS

We investigated 44 knees in 34 patients who underwent primary PS-TKA by a single surgeon. The central joint gaps and ML tilting angles at 0°, 10°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120° and 135° flexion were measured during surgery. At a minimum of two year follow-up, we analyzed in vivo kinematics of these knees and examined the influence of intraoperative measurements on postoperative kinematics.

RESULTS

Gap difference of knee flexion at 135° minus 0° was correlated with the total posterior translation of lateral femoral condyle (r=0.336, p=0.042) and femoral external rotation (r=0.488, p=0.002) during squatting, anteroposterior position of lateral femoral condyle (r=-0.510, p=0.001) and maximum knee flexion (r=0.355, p=0.031) in kneeling. Similar correlations were observed between deep flexion gap differences with respect to the 90° reference and postoperative knee kinematics. Well-balanced knees showed less anterior translation of medial femoral condyle in mid- to deep flexion, consistent femoral external rotation, and the most neutral valgus/varus rotation compared with unbalanced knees.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate the importance of adequate intraoperative joint gaps in deep flexion and ML soft tissue balance throughout the range of motion.

Factors affecting the achievement of Japanese-style deep knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior-stabilized prosthesis with high-flex knee design

BACKGROUND

Achievement of very deep knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can play a critical role in the satisfaction of patients who demand a floor-sitting lifestyle and engage in high-flexion daily activities (e.g., seiza-sitting). Seiza-sitting is characterized by the knees flexed >145º and feet turned sole upwards underneath the buttocks with the tibia internally rotated. The present study investigated factors affecting the achievement of seiza-sitting after TKA using posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis with high-flex knee design.

METHODS

Subjects comprised 32 patients who underwent TKA with high-flex knee prosthesis and achieved seiza-sitting (knee flexion >145º) postoperatively. Another 32 patients served as controls who were capable of knee flexion >145º preoperatively, but failed to achieve seiza-sitting postoperatively. Accuracy of femoral and tibial component positions was assessed in terms of deviation from the ideal position using a two-dimensional to three-dimensional matching technique. Accuracies of the component position, posterior condylar offset ratio and intraoperative gap length were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with >3º internally rotated tibial component was significantly higher in patients who failed at seiza-sitting (41 %) than among patients who achieved it (13 %, p = 0.021). Comparison of intraoperative gap length between patient groups revealed that gap length at 135º flexion was significantly larger in patients who achieved seiza-sitting (4.2 ± 0.4 mm) than in patients who failed at it (2.7 ± 0.4 mm, p = 0.007). Conversely, no significant differences in gap inclination were seen between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of surgical factors, accurate implant positioning, particularly rotational alignment of the tibial component, and maintenance of a sufficient joint gap at 135º flexion appear to represent critical factors for achieving >145º of deep knee flexion after TKA.

Therapeutic modalities and postural balance of patients with knee osteoarthritis: systematic review

AbstractObjective The objective of this review was to evaluate the evidence of the influence of therapeutic modalities on postural balance in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).Methods A search for published papers on therapeutic modalities was conducted using the Pubmed, Medline, Lilacs and SciELO databases. The keywords “knee” and “balance” in combination with “osteoarthritis” were used as the search strategy. Randomized controlled clinical trials published in the last 10 years in either English or Portuguese were selected. The PEDro scale was applied to assess the quality of the selected clinical trials.Results A total of 46 studies of patients with knee OA were found, of which seven were analyzed in full and 39 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the seven studies reviewed, six were considered to have a high methodological quality on the PEDro scale. Several therapeutic modalities were found (physical exercise, hydrotherapy, electrotherapy and manual therapy), and postural balance improved in only three studies.Conclusion The studies included in this systematic review had a high methodological quality, so it can be concluded that the therapeutic modalities used in those studies improved postural balance in patients with knee OA.

Mobile-bearing prosthesis and intraoperative gap balancing are not predictors of superior knee flexion: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

Range of motion is a crucial measure of the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Gap balancing technique and mobile-bearing prosthesis can improve postoperative range of motion. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that are predictive of the postoperative range of motion.

METHODS

A total of 94 knees with varus osteoarthritis were prospectively randomized to receive either a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing or a posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing prosthesis. All preoperative and postoperative protocols and operative techniques were identical in the two groups. Extension and flexion joint gaps were measured using a tensor device during the operation. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the best predictors of the knee flexion angle 2 years after the operation. The independent variables were type of prosthesis (mobile-bearing or fixed-bearing), difference between flexion and extension joint gaps (mm), age, gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative and intraoperative knee flexion angles, change in posterior condylar offset, and posterior tilt of the tibial plateau.

RESULTS

The mean difference between flexion and extension joint gaps was 0.8 ± 1.3 (mean ± SD) mm for mobile-bearing and 0.8 ± 1.9 mm for fixed-bearing prosthesis. The mean flexion angle for mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing groups was 120 ± 16° and 116 ± 20° preoperatively (n.s.), 142 ± 9° and 141 ± 12° intraoperatively (n.s.), and 129 ± 10° and 128 ± 13° at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.773), respectively. Predictors were identified in the following three categories: (1) preoperative flexion angle, (2) intraoperative radiographic flexion angle, and (3) BMI (R = 0.603, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mobile-bearing prosthesis and optimal gap balancing did not result in superior postoperative flexion angle. Better preoperative and intraoperative flexion angles and lower BMI were the significant predictors for better postoperative flexion angle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level I.

Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether there are differences in benefits and harms between mobile and fixed prostheses for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The previous Cochrane review published in 2004 included two articles. Many more trials have been performed since then; therefore an update is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of mobile bearing compared with fixed bearing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for functional and clinical outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science up to 27 February 2014, and the trial registers ClinicalTrials.gov, Multiregister, Current Controlled Trials and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for data from unpublished trials, up to 11 February 2014. We also screened the reference lists of selected articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials comparing mobile bearing with fixed bearing prostheses in cruciate retaining TKA among patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, using functional or clinical outcome measures and follow-up of at least six months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 19 studies with 1641 participants (1616 with OA (98.5%) and 25 with RA (1.5%)) and 2247 knees. Seventeen new studies were included in this update.Quality of the evidence ranged from moderate (knee pain) to low (other outcomes). Most studies had unclear risk of bias for allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment and selective reporting, and high risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and other bias. Knee painWe calculated the standardised mean difference (SMD) for pain, using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) in 11 studies (58%) and 1531 knees (68%). No statistically significant differences between groups were reported (SMD 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.22, P value 0.15). This represents an absolute risk difference of 2.4% points higher (95% CI 0.8% lower to 5.9% higher) on the KSS pain scale and a relative percent change of 0.22% (95% CI 0.07% lower to 0.53% higher). The results were homogeneous. Clinical and functional scores The KSS clinical score did not differ statistically significantly between groups (14 studies (74%) and 1845 knees (82%)) with a mean difference (MD) of -1.06 points (95% CI -2.87 to 0.74, P value 0.25) and heterogeneous results. KSS function was reported in 14 studies (74%) with 1845 knees (82%) as an MD of -0.10 point (95% CI -1.93 to 1.73, P value 0.91) and homogeneous results. In two studies (11%), the KSS total score was favourable for mobile bearing (159 vs 132 for fixed bearing), with MD of -26.52 points (95% CI -45.03 to -8.01, P value 0.005), but with a wide 95% confidence interval indicating uncertainty about the estimate.Other reported scoring systems did not show statistically significant differences: Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score (seven studies (37%) in 1021 knees (45%)) with an MD of -1.36 (95% CI -4.18 to 1.46, P value 0.35); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score (two studies (11%), 167 knees (7%)) with an MD of -4.46 (95% CI -16.26 to 7.34, P value 0.46); and Oxford total (five studies (26%), 647 knees (29%) with an MD of -0.25 (95% CI -1.41 to 0.91, P value 0.67). Health-related quality of lifeThree studies (16%) with 498 knees (22%) reported on health-related quality of life, and no statistically significant differences were noted between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing groups. The Short Form (SF)-12 Physical Component Summary had an MD of -1.96 (95% CI -4.55 to 0.63, P value 0.14) and heterogeneous results. Revision surgeryTwenty seven revisions (1.3%) were performed in 17 studies (89%) with 2065 knees (92%). In all, 13 knees were revised in the fixed bearing group and 14 knees in the mobile bearing group. No statistically significant differences were found (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, P value 0.58), and homogeneous results were reported. MortalityIn seven out of 19 studies, 13 participants (37%) died. Two of these participants had undergone bilateral surgery, and for seven participants, it was unclear which prosthesis they had received; therefore they were excluded from the analyses. Thus our analysis included four out of 191 participants (2.1%) who had died: one in the fixed bearing group and three in the mobile bearing group. No statistically significant differences were found. The risk difference was -0.02 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.03, P value 0.49) and results were homogeneous. Reoperation ratesThirty reoperations were performed in 17 studies (89%) with 2065 knees (92%): 18 knees in the fixed bearing group (of the 1031 knees) and 12 knees in the mobile group (of the 1034 knees). No statistically significant differences were found. The risk difference was -0.01 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, P value 0.99) with homogeneous results. Other serious adverse eventsSixteen studies (84%) reported nine other serious adverse events in 1735 knees (77%): four in the fixed bearing group (of the 862 knees) and five in the mobile bearing group (of the 873 knees). No statistically significant differences were found (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, P value 0.88), and results were homogeneous.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate- to low-quality evidence suggests that mobile bearing prostheses may have similar effects on knee pain, clinical and functional scores, health-related quality of life, revision surgery, mortality, reoperation rate and other serious adverse events compared with fixed bearing prostheses in posterior cruciate retaining TKA. Therefore we cannot draw firm conclusions. Most (98.5%) participants had OA, so the findings primarily reflect results reported in participants with OA. Future studies should report in greater detail outcomes such as those presented in this systematic review, with sufficient follow-up time to allow gathering of high-quality evidence and to inform clinical practice. Large registry-based studies may have added value, but they are subject to treatment-by-indication bias. Therefore, this systematic review of RCTs can be viewed as the best available evidence.

Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of press-fit condylar sigma fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in the same patients

BACKGROUND

We are aware of no study that has compared press-fit condylar Sigma fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in the same patients after more than ten years of follow-up. The purpose of the current study was to compare these two implants with respect to the functional and radiographic results, prevalence of osteolysis, and overall revision rates at a mean of 12.1 years of follow-up.

METHODS

The study consisted of a consecutive series of 444 patients (mean age [and standard deviation], 66.5 ± 7.4 years) who underwent simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty, with one side treated immediately after the other. All of the patients received a press-fit condylar Sigma mobile-bearing prosthesis on one side and a press-fit condylar Sigma fixed-bearing prosthesis on the contralateral side. The minimum duration of follow-up was ten years (mean, 12.1 years; range, ten to thirteen years). At the time of each follow-up visit, the patients were assessed clinically and radiographically.

RESULTS

Postoperative total knee scores (95 and 94 points), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (19 and 18 points), University of California, Los Angeles activity score (both prostheses, 5 points), range of motion (129° ± 6.3° and 127° ± 6.8°), and radiographic findings did not differ significantly between the press-fit condylar Sigma mobile and fixed-bearing designs at the final follow-up. The prevalence of aseptic loosening (1.4% and 1.8%) did not differ significantly between the mobile and fixed-bearing implant designs. No knee in either group had osteolysis. The estimated survival rate with revision as the end point was 98.2% (95% confidence interval, 91% to 99%) and 97.5% (95% confidence interval, 91% to 99%) at 12.1 years for the mobile and fixed-bearing implant groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present long-term clinical study suggest that excellent clinical and radiographic results were achieved with both the press-fit condylar Sigma mobile and fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining total knee designs. We found no significant clinical advantage for a mobile-bearing over a fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No difference in clinical outcome between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and radiographic results of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases from 1966 to January 2012. No language restriction was applied. Reference lists of all the selected articles were hand-searched for any additional trials. Trial quality was assessed using the modified Jadad scale. Two authors independently extracted data from all eligible studies, including study design, participants, interventions, and outcomes (Knee Society Score, range of movement, radiolucent line, patient preference, walking support, pain score, and complications). The data were using fixed-effects or random-effects models with mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies involving 2,799 patients were identified in this analysis. Meta-analysis showed lower pain score (OR, 0.66, 95% CI 0.46, 0.94) in mobile-bearing TKA than fixed-bearing TKA. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding Knee Society Score (SMD, -0.17, 95% CI: -0.60, 0.26), range of movement (SMD, -0.05, 95% CI: -0.63, 0.53), radiolucent line (OR, 1.03, 95% CI 0.74, 1.44), patient preference (OR, 1.15, 95% CI 0.82, 1.61), walking support (OR, 1.07, 95% CI 0.68, 1.70), and complications (OR, 0.85, 95% CI 0.59, 1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggested that there was no significant difference between clinical and radiographic results of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing TKA except for pain score. Regarding clinical relevance, the less incidence of pain could be the advantage for selecting mobile-bearing TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Does cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty enhance knee flexion in Western and East Asian patient populations? A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study analyzed the published data to examine if CR TKAs can enhance the flexion and functional outcomes of the knee in the Western and East Asian populations using a meta-analysis approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of literature published through Medline and EMBASE was conducted. The inclusion criteria were: primary TKA, follow up duration greater than one year, a fixed bearing CR prosthesis, and data for maximum pre- and post-operative flexion along with standard deviations or errors. We estimated the weighted mean differences between pre- and post-operative flexion, extension and knee scores (KSS and HSS) via a random effect model.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles were selected and reviewed among 1229 studies that included 1090 knees of the Western and 516 knees of the East Asian. No significant difference was noted in maximal knee flexion pre- and post-operatively, when all the studies were pooled together (-0.17°, p=0.93, post-operative<pre-operative). The mean difference in flexion was -1.87° (p=0.2) and 2.03° (p=0.17), respectively in the both populations. However, the extension angle was significantly improved by -5.49° and -13.05° (p<0.05), respectively. KSS scores were significantly improved by 46.39 and 51.63, and HSS scores by 36.65 and 30.67 (p<0.05), respectively in the both populations.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis indicated that contemporary CR TKAs have not been shown to enhance post-operative flexion capability in the Western and East Asian. The extension angles of the knee and the knee scores were significantly improved in both populations.

A systematic review and meta-regression of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee replacement in 41 studies

Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacement (TKR) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts. However, no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing (FB) TKR have been found. In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores. Furthermore, we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to collect clinical trials comparing MB and FB in primary TKR. The primary outcomes were revision rates for any reason, aseptic loosening and wear. Secondary outcomes included range of movement, Knee Society score (KSS), Oxford knee score (OKS), Short-Form 12 (SF-12) score and radiological parameters. Meta-regression techniques were used to explore factors modifying the observed effect. Our search yielded 1827 publications, of which 41 studies met our inclusion criteria, comprising over 6000 TKRs. Meta-analyses showed no clinically relevant differences in terms of revision rates, clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs. It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice.

Effect of posterior femoral condylar offset and posterior tibial slope on maximal flexion angle of the knee in posterior cruciate ligament sacrificing total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of femoral condylar offset and posterior tibial slope on maximal flexion angle of the knee in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-sacrificing total knee arthroplasty (TKA, Medial-Pivot Knee System).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five knees in 35 patients who could be followed up more than 1 year after PCL-sacrificing TKA were evaluated retrospectively. We measured and analyzed the preoperative and postoperative maximal flexion angle, posterior femoral condylar offset difference, posterior femoral condylar offset ratio difference, and tibial slope.

RESULTS

The mean maximal flexion angle after TKA was 118.44°±9.8° and significantly related to postoperative tibial slope (11.78°±6.2°) in correlation analysis (R=0.451, p=0.002). There was no statistical relationship between the postoperative maximal flexion angle and the posterior femoral condylar offset difference (3.24±3.862 mm, R=0.105, p=0.493) and posterior femoral condylar offset ratio difference (0.039±0.029 mm, R=-0.163, p=0.284).

CONCLUSIONS

The maximal flexion angle of the knee after PCL-sacrificing TKA was significantly related to the postoperative tibial slope. Therefore, posterior tibial slope can be considered as a factor that affects maximal flexion angle after PCL-sacrificing TKA.

Comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with a mean five-year follow-up: A meta-analysis

Controversy exists regarding the clinical and radiological differences in outcomes between fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) at the mid- or long-term follow-up. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have evaluated FB and MB TKAs. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, Medline and Embase. The data, including demographic information, methodological quality, duration of follow-up, clinical and radiographical outcomes, patient preferences and complications, were extracted. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed in accordance with the guidelines presented in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Nine trials, studying 1,821 knees, were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. The Knee Society score and the maximum knee flexion demonstrated no difference between the FB and MB groups (P=0.47 and P=0.72, respectively). Similarly, no difference was revealed between the groups for radiological outcomes or general health results. An increased number of high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-ups are required to validate the results.

Intraoperative joint gaps affect postoperative range of motion in TKAs with posterior-stabilized prostheses

BACKGROUND

Joint gaps and mediolateral (ML) soft tissue balance have long been known to affect clinical scores and patient function after TKA, but the relationship between gaps and soft tissue balance remain poorly defined. If specific relationships exist between soft tissue tension and patient function, then objective targets could be established to assist surgeons in achieving more consistent postoperative knee function.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

By performing instrumented gap measurements during TKA, we sought to quantify the relationships between intraoperative soft tissue tension and clinical scores and patient function.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 57 patients with 63 primary TKAs with posterior-stabilized prostheses. Joint gaps and ML soft tissue balance were measured intraoperatively from 0° to 135° with the patella reduced after independent bone cuts and soft tissue releases. We determined the relationships between these intraoperative measurements and postoperative ROM and Knee Society scores at minimum 2-year followup.

RESULTS

Larger joint gaps at 120° and 135° flexion predicted larger postoperative knee flexion (r=0.296 and r=0.393, respectively), whereas larger gaps at 10° flexion predicted greater postoperative knee extension (r=0.285). Knees with rectangular joint gaps did not show better ROM or Knee Society scores compared with knees with trapezoidal joint gaps. In the range of normal surgical variation, neither joint gaps nor gap asymmetry affected the incidence of postoperative instability.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoiding small joint gaps in extension and in deep flexion should allow patients who undergo TKAs to obtain maximum ROM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intraoperative soft tissue tension and postoperative range of motion in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative soft tissue tension can significantly impact the range of motion following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the level of impact remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between intraoperative soft tissue tension and postoperative range of motion.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 504 patients operated with posterior stabilized TKA. During surgery, we adjusted the soft tissue tension from 80 to 160 N for both flexion and extension with the tensor/balancer device and torque driver. Patients were grouped into three categories based on intraoperative soft tissue tension and analyzed with the 1-year postoperative range of motion using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, Pearson's correlation coefficients were determined to assess the association between intraoperative soft tissue tension and postoperative range of motion.

RESULTS

The absolute tension value at 90° flexion did not affect the postoperative flexion angle (p = 0.61). The absolute tension value at 0° extension did not affect the postoperative extension angle (p = 0.91). Likewise, the difference of tension between flexion and extension did not affect the postoperative flexion angle (p = 0.86). All comparisons did not have the differences in sex, height, weight, body mass index, diagnosis and preoperative range of motion between three groups. No significant correlation was found in each comparison (r = 0.078, r = 0.031, r = -0.052, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe a correlation between intraoperative soft tissue tension adjusted from 80 to 160 N and 1-year postoperative range of motion in posterior stabilized TKA.

The intraoperative gap difference (flexion gap minus extension gap) is altered by insertion of the trial femoral component

A Tensor/Balancer device has been recently developed in order to assess soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under more physiological conditions. This device allows us to measure the joint gap with a trial femoral component in place with the patella reduced. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether the placement of the component changes the intraoperative gap difference (flexion gap distance minus extension gap distance). We prospectively investigated the extension (0°) and flexion (90°) gaps in 73 posterior-stabilized TKAs under 30 lb of joint distraction force. Then, we compared the gap difference with and without the trial femoral component in place. Our results showed that the intraoperative gap difference with the trial femoral component in place was larger than the intraoperative gap difference without the trial component (p=0.00003; with the trial component: mean 4.7 mm (standard deviation (SD): 3.0mm); without the trial component: mean 2.7 mm (SD: 3.3mm)). We consider that the change in gap difference with or without femoral component was caused by a relative difference in the elasticity and/or tightness of the soft tissue in extension versus flexion. Surgeons should be aware of this effect of the femoral component when considering intraoperative soft tissue balancing which leads to postoperative stability of the knee joint consequently.

Sagittal placement of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty predicts knee flexion contracture at one-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Flexion contracture has been shown to impair function and reduce satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to identify modifiable intra-operative variables that predict post-TKA knee extension.

METHODS

Data was collected prospectively on 95 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, including pre-operative assessment, intra-operative computer assisted surgery (CAS) measurements and functional outcome including range of motion at one year. Patients were divided into two groups: those with mild flexion contracture (> 5°) at the one-year follow-up and those achieving full extension.

RESULTS

The sagittal orientation of the distal femoral cut differed significantly between groups at the one-year follow-up (p = 0.014). Sagittal alignment of greater than 3.5° from the mechanical axis was shown to increase the relative risk of a mild flexion contracture at one-year follow-up by 2.9 times, independent of other variables.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the sagittal alignment of the distal femoral cut more than 3.5° from the mechanical axis is an independent risk factor for clinically detectable flexion contracture one year from index procedure.

Measurement of knee joint gaps without bone resection: "physiologic" extension and flexion gaps in total knee arthroplasty are asymmetric and unequal and anterior and posterior cruciate ligament resections produce different gap changes

General agreement is that flexion and extension gaps should be equal and symmetrical in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. However, comparisons using a standard TKA approach to normal knee joints that have not undergone bone resection are currently unavailable. Since bony preparation can influence capsule and ligament tension, our purpose was to perform measurements without this influence. Ten normal cadaveric knees were assessed using a standard medial parapatellar TKA approach with patellar subluxation. Gap measurements were carried out twice each alternating 100 and 200 N per compartment using a prototypical force-determining ligament balancer without the need for bony resection. Initial measurements were performed in extension, followed by 908 of flexion. The ACL was then resected, and finally the PCL was resected, and measurements were carried out in an analogous fashion. In general, the lateral compartment could be stretched further than the medial compartment, and the corresponding flexion gap values were significantly larger. ACL resection predominantly increased extension gaps, while PCL resection increased flexion gaps. Distraction force of 100 N per compartment appeared adequate; increasing to 200 N did not improve the results.

Comparative study of tibial posterior slope angle following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using one of three implants

PURPOSE

Pre- and postoperative tibial posterior slope angles (PSAs) were assessed in patients who underwent cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 386 cruciate retaining TKA were performed in 308 patients and retrospectively reviewed. Based on the prostheses, 202 cases using NexGen were classified as group I, 120 cases using PFC sigma as group II, and 64 cases using Vanguard as group III. Postoperative PSA of groups I, II, and III were compared.

RESULTS

In groups I, II, and III, postoperative PSA was 6.0˚, 6.0˚, and 4.5˚, respectively (p < 0.001). Between preoperative measurement and final follow-up examination, mean knee score (59.7 to 97.3), function score (54.2 to 90.5), and range of motion (ROM; 126.7° to 132.2°) improved. These three values did not differ significantly among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3° slope of the Vanguard polyethylene insert caused the difference in PSAs. This design characteristic should be considered when using this implant in TKA.

Meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical outcomes comparing mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty

Mobile bearing (MB) knee replacements were designed with the goal of increased conformity and decreased bearing wear. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of MB and fixed bearing (FB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We identified 14 studies reporting our primary outcome of Knee Society Scores (KSS). We also pooled data for post-operative range of motion (ROM) and Hospital for Special Surgery scores (HSS). The standard difference in mean outcome scores for KSS and HSS demonstrated no difference between groups (P = .902, and P = .426 respectively). Similarly, the pooled data for ROM showed no difference between groups (P = .265). The results of this study found no significant differences between clinical outcomes of MB and FB TKA.

Polyethylene thickness is a risk factor for wear necessitating insert exchange

Purpose

The aim of this observational study was to investigate the optimal minimal polyethylene (PE) thickness in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and identify other risk factors associated with revision of the insert due to wear.

Methods

A total of 84 TKA were followed for 11–16 years. All patients received the same prosthesis design (Interax; Howmedica/ Stryker) with halfbearings: separate PE-inserts medially and laterally. Statistical analysis comprised Cox-regression to correct for confounding.

Results

Eight knees (9.5%) had been revised due to thinning inserts and an additional patient is scheduled for revision. PE thickness, diagnosis, BMI and weight are risk factors for insert exchange. For each millimetre decrease in PE thickness, the risk of insert exchange increases 3.0 times, which remains after correction for age, gender, weight, diagnosis and femoral-tibial angle. Insert exchange was 4.73 times more likely in OA-patients compared to RA-patients. For every unit increase in BMI and weight the risk for insert exchange increases 1.40 times and 1.14 times, respectively.

Conclusions

In conclusion we therefore advise against the use of thin PE inserts in modular TKA and recommend PE inserts with a minimal 8-mm thickness.

Pre-operative frontal plane malalignment predicts the extension gap asymmetry in knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

In contrast to bone cuts, soft-tissue releases cannot be planned sufficiently prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intra-operative evaluation of the extension gap after tibial or femoral resection may result in an unnecessarily excessive bone resection. The present study examines whether extension gap asymmetry can be calculated from the pre-operative long standing X-ray.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 32 patients with navigated unconstrained TKA were included. The pre-operative malalignment was measured on long standing X-rays and compared with the extension gap asymmetry that was documented by the navigation system intra-operatively.

RESULTS

The mean pre-operative malalignment was 9.8° (20° valgus to 14.8° varus). The intra-operatively measured extension gap showed a mean asymmetry of 3.4 ± 2.4 mm. Both correlated following the equation: asymmetry [mm] = 0.35 * malalignment [°] (R = 0.855, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend planning the intra-operative release and tibial bone cut using long standing X-rays.

The use of navigation to obtain rectangular flexion and extension gaps during primary total knee arthroplasty and midterm clinical results

The authors evaluated 112 knees treated by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a navigation-assisted modified gap balancing technique. Initial mediolateral gap differences in extension and in 90° of flexion were measured after proximal tibia bone cutting. Final flexion and extension gaps were measured by checking distances under equal tension before prosthesis insertion. Amount of femoral bone cutting and external rotations of femoral components were found to depend on initial gaps. Patients with a final rectangular gap had greater knee flexion angles preoperatively and at 1 year after TKA. However, no differences were observed between the clinical and radiologic outcomes of knees with rectangular and nonrectangular gaps at 1 or 4 years after TKA. The study shows that the navigation-assisted modified gap balancing technique provides an effective means of achieving rectangular flexion and extension gaps during TKA.

Is patella eversion during total knee arthroplasty crucial for gap adjustment and soft-tissue balancing?

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of soft-tissue balance by the gap technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) impacts femoral component rotation positioning. Proper femoral component rotation is a critical factor in TKA, both for adequate patellar tracking and in achieving a symmetrical flexion gap. Soft tissue balance assessment and gap measurements are performed at 90° flexion and with the patella everted in conventional TKA; during MIS-TKA, this step is performed with the patella in situ. We therefore investigated intraoperative joint gap parameters at 90° flexion with and without patellar eversion during conventional TKA, so as to better understand the influence of this intraoperative patellar position factor on final ligament balance.

HYPOTHESIS

Conducting TKA without patellar eversion increases both gap size and gap inclination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four osteoarthritic knees were included in the study. Joint gap size and inclination were measured intraoperatively on a knee in 90° flexion, with and without patellar eversion.

RESULTS

The joint gap with patella in situ (17.0±3.4 mm) was significantly greater than with patellar eversion (15.4±3.0 mm), as was gap inclination at 90° flexion with the patella in situ (4.9±3.1°) compared to with patellar eversion (4.0±2.9°).

DISCUSSION

The flexion gap inclination obtained without patellar eversion was steeper than with patellar eversion. This induced more externally rotated femoral positioning in absence of patellar eversion. These results ought to be taken into account by surgeons considering switching from conventional to MIS-TKA.

Development of a force-determining tensor to measure "physiologic knee ligament gaps" without bone resection using a total knee arthroplasty approach

BACKGROUND

Ligament balancing is a challenging but essential part of successful total knee arthroplasty. There is general agreement that flexion and extension gaps should be equal and symmetrical. However, to date there are no available comparisons to physiologically normal knee joints that have not undergone bone resection. There are also no standards specifying which instruments (e.g., spacers, distractors, trial components, navigation systems) and particularly what degree of force should be used for gap distraction.

METHODS

To measure the physiological extension and flexion gaps, a prototypical force-determining tensor (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) was constructed and adapted so that force could be applied directly through Schanz screws inserted medially and laterally on the tibia and femur, independent of each other and without the need for bony resection. Ten normal cadaveric knees were assessed using a standard medial parapatellar total knee arthroplasty approach with patellar subluxation. Gap measurements were carried out twice, alternating distraction forces of 100 and 200 N each time.

RESULTS

The prototype was implemented successfully. Repeat measurements showed only slight deviation from the original, resulting in minimal standard error. Precision did not vary with the application of greater force (200 N), but gap size increased significantly (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The success of this assessment with cadaveric knees indicates that this prototype can be applied to measure flexion and extension gaps without the need for bony resection. Increasing the distraction force to 200 N does not improve results, so 100 N per compartment appears adequate. Most likely, the extension and flexion gaps are physiologically asymmetric and unequal, and the kinematics are markedly altered after resection of the PCL and/or ACL. This new force-determining tensor can be used for further analyses, e.g., to explore the effects of selective ligament resection.

Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in functional outcome between the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee replacement systems. One hundred twenty patients were randomised to receive either a fixed-bearing or rotating-platform PFC Sigma total knee replacement. Range of movement (ROM), Oxford knee score (OKS) and Knee Society score (KSS) were assessed independently before and one year after surgery. Weight-bearing X-rays were taken immediately and one year post surgery to determine the incidence of osteolysis and loosening. At a mean follow-up of 13.4 months there was no statistically significant difference in mean ROM, OKS and KSS between the two groups. There was no evidence of osteolysis or loosening in either of the groups and no revision for infection or implant failure. This study shows that there is no statistically significant difference in functional outcome between the two types of implants at short-term follow-up.