Clinical and radiographic outcomes of an accelerometer-based system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With an Imageless, Second-Generation Robotic System

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is increasingly used in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), with imageless systems recently receiving Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the use of robotic assistance in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This paper describes the imageless surgical technique for robotic revision TKA using a second-generation robotic system and details both intraoperative and 90-day outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 115 robotic revision TKAs from March 2021 to May 2023 at 3 tertiary academic centers. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical data, and 90-day outcomes were collected. Pain and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores preoperatively and postoperatively were recorded. All-cause reoperations at the final follow-up were detailed. The mean patient age was 65 years (range, 43 to 88), and 58% were women. The mean follow-up time was 13 months (range, 3 to 51).

RESULTS

The most common indications for rTKA were instability (n = 37, 32%) and aseptic loosening (n = 42, 37%). There were 83 rTKAs to a posterior-stabilized liner, 22 to a varus-valgus constrained liner, and 5 to a hinged construct. The median polyethylene size was 11 (interquartile range, 10 to 13), and 93% of patients had their joint line restored within 5 millimeters of the native contralateral knee. Within the 90-day postoperative window, there were 8 emergency department visits and 2 readmissions. At the final follow-up, there were 5 reoperations and 2 manipulations under anesthesia. There were 4 patients who required irrigation and debridement after superficial wound dehiscence, and one had an arthrotomy disruption after a fall.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates favorable intraoperative and 90-day outcomes and suggests that imageless robotic surgery is a promising modality in rTKA. Further studies comparing the longitudinal outcomes after robotic and conventional rTKA are warranted.

The Accuracy of a Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation System for Tibial Alignment Can be Reliable during Total Knee Arthroplasty for Obese Patients

A portable accelerometer-based navigation system can be useful for achieving the target alignment. Tibial registration is based on the medial and lateral malleoli; however, the identification of landmarks may be difficult in obese (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) patients whose bones are not easily palpable from the body surface. This study compared tibial component alignment achieved using a portable accelerometer-based navigation system (Knee Align 2 [KA2]) in obese and control groups and aimed to validate the accuracy of bone cutting in obese patients. A total of 210 knees that underwent primary total knee arthroplasty using the KA2 system were included. After 1:3 propensity score matching, there were 32 and 96 knees in the BMI >30 group (group O) and BMI ≤30 group (group C), respectively. The absolute deviations of the tibial implant from the intended alignment were evaluated in the coronal plane (hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle and medial proximal tibial angle) and sagittal plane (posterior tibial slope [PTS]). The inlier rate of each cohort, which was defined as tibial component alignment within 2 degrees of the intended alignment, was investigated. In the coronal plane, the absolute deviations of the HKA and MPTA from the intended alignment were 2.2 ± 1.8 degrees and 1.8 ± 1.5 degrees in group C and 1.7 ± 1.5 degrees and 1.7 ± 1.0 degrees in group O (p = 1.26, and p = 0.532). In the sagittal plane, the absolute deviations of the tibial implant were 1.6 ± 1.2 degrees in group C and 1.5 ± 1.1 degrees in group O (p = 0.570). The inlier rate was not significantly different between group C and group O (HKA: 64.6 vs. 71.9%, p = 0.521; MPTA: 67.7 vs. 78.1%, p = 0.372; PTS: 82.2 vs. 77.8%, p = 0.667). The accuracy of tibial bone cutting for the obese group was comparable to that of the control group. An accelerometer-based portable navigation system can be useful when attempting to achieve the target tibial alignment in obese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  Level IV.

Research Advances in the Application of AI for Preoperative Measurements in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is widely used in clinical practice as an effective treatment for end-stage knee joint lesions. It can effectively correct joint deformities, relieve painful symptoms, and improve joint function. The reconstruction of lower extremity joint lines and soft tissue balance are important factors related to the durability of the implant; therefore, it is especially important to measure the joint lines and associated angles before TKA. In this article, we review the technological progress in the preoperative measurement of TKA.

Accelerometer-Based Handheld Navigation Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Decrease Blood Loss Compared to Conventional Instrumentation: A Prospective Comparative Study

Introduction Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) can be associated with significant peri- and post-operative blood loss necessitating blood transfusion. The blood loss may be relatively less when the accelerometer-based handheld navigation system (HHNS) is used, as there is neither a need for intramedullary breach nor additional pin insertions. The primary hypothesis was that HHNS instrumentation reduced perioperative blood loss when compared with conventional instrumentation, and to prove this, we compared the perioperative parameters like tourniquet time, hemoglobin loss, and estimated blood loss between patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using conventional instrumentation with handheld navigation instrumentation. Methods This prospective comparative study involves 40 patients in the HHNS group and 40 patients in the conventional group based on the instrumentation used, respectively. Tourniquet was used in all the cases. Patient characteristics like age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were recorded. The perioperative parameters like tourniquet time, the estimated blood loss, hemoglobin loss, blood transfusions, and the number of units transfused were recorded and compared between the groups. Results There was no significant difference in age, BMI, ASA grade, or CCI between the two groups. The tourniquet time was 83.7 ± 9.6 in the navigation and 73.9 ± 10.3 in the conventional group. The estimated Hb loss was lower at 2.5 ± 1.6 in the HHNS group compared to 3.0 ± 1.8 in the conventional group (p<0.001). Similarly, estimated blood loss was also lower at 830 ± 285ml for the HHNS group compared to 1088 ± 228 in the conventional group. Two patients in the navigation group had a total of four units transfused, whereas three patients in the conventional group had five units of blood transfusion. Conclusions The primary hypothesis that HHNS reduced perioperative blood loss was confirmed by the results of our study. We demonstrated that HHNS instrumentation significantly decreased the estimated blood loss, drain volume, and hemoglobin loss compared to conventional instrumentation with similar operating times. Though blood transfusions were seen in fewer patients, there was no significant reduction in blood transfusions by HHNS instrumentation.

Comparative Analysis of Radiological Evaluation and Early Functional Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using an Accelerometer-Based Handheld Navigation System and Conventional Instrumentation: A Prospective Study

Background

An accelerometer-based handheld navigation system (HHNS) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) does not require a large console needed for computer-assisted navigation systems and has been shown to decrease component malalignment in TKA. The study aimed to use HHNS with conventional instrumentation to compare the radiological evaluation and functional outcomes of TKA.

Materials and methods

This was a multi-surgeon, prospective, assessor-blinded comparative study of 122 patients undergoing unilateral TKA. We used a stratified randomized sampling method to select 35/48 patients undergoing TKA using a handheld navigation system and 35/74 patients undergoing TKA using conventional instrumentation and divided them into two groups: the HHNS group and (conventional) CONV group. Postoperative radiographic evaluation was based on the tibial and femoral alignment angle, posterior tibial slope, and tibiofemoral angle measured from full-length lower-limb anteroposterior and lateral views of the knee. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Society Score (KSS) with a two-year serial follow-up were used to evaluate functional outcomes.

Results

The mean tibial alignment angle and posterior tibial slope were 0.78° ± 1.27° and 4.38° ± 0.86°, respectively, in the HHNS cohort and 2.63° ± 1.54° and 2.12° ± 1.82°, respectively, in the CONV group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the femoral alignment angles. The overall alignment using the mean tibiofemoral angle was 179.21° ± 1.82° in the HHNS group and 177.31° ± 2.18° in the CONV group (p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the KSS and OKS at the two-year follow-up between the groups.

Conclusions

The use of HHNS in TKA significantly increased accuracy in limb and implant alignment, but there was no significant difference in the two-years functional outcomes.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Robotic Arm Technology

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful operation for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. Increasing use of computer-assisted and robotic-assisted total joint arthroplasty has been shown to improve component position, with short-term studies demonstrating improved survivability in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Robotic-assisted technology has been shown to be helpful in revising unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA, as well as hip fusion to total hip arthroplasty, but few have described revision of a primary TKA. This case report describes the use of robotic-assisted technology in revision TKA. Robotic assistance during revision TKA may improve component alignment and increase prosthesis longevity. Future research is needed to investigate the effects on survivorship and cost.

Accelerometer-based, hand-held navigation for improved knee alignment in total knee arthroplasty: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Malalignment in total knee arthroplasty has been associated with poor implant longevity and clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of accelerometer-based navigation in restoring the mechanical axis.

METHODS

106 primary total knee arthroplasties performed during February 2016 to September 2017 at a tertiary care centre in India were enrolled in this observational study. We noted the intra-op tourniquet time. Two separate blinded observers measured the preoperative mechanical axis and the post operative radiological results (mechanical axis, coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral and tibial components) and the mean value was taken as final data. Interclass correlation was done to look for variability between the two observers.

RESULTS

The mean pre operative mechanical axis was 13.74 ± 10.44. The mean tourniquet time was 53.14 ± 7.42 min 91.5% (96/106) knees were within ±3° of neutral mechanical axis with a mean of 1.00° ± 2.68°. The femoral and tibial components with coronal alignment within ±3° perpendicular to the mechanical axis were 93.39% (99/106) and 89.62% (95/106) respectively. In the sagittal plane 89.62% of the femoral components and 87.73% of the tibial components were within ±3° perpendicular to the axis of tibia.

CONCLUSION

The Accelerometer based portable navigation system effectively reduces the coronal and sagittal alignment outliers in total knee arthroplasty and has no role in rotational alignment of components.

No difference in clinical outcomes between portable navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Portable accelerometer-based navigation devices (PAD) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been proposed to combine the alignment precision of computer navigation with the efficiency of conventional instrumentation (CON). The aim of this study was to determine if PAD was more effective than CON in TKA in improving clinical outcomes at medium term follow-up.

METHODS

Participants undergoing primary TKA were randomly assigned to either PAD or CON. The primary outcome was the mean between-group difference in the four subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (∆KOOS₄ ) between preoperative status and latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes included analysis of between-group differences in all KOOS subscales, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (∆WOMAC) scores, complications and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

Of the 178 participants allocated to a treatment arm, 159 (89.3%) completed follow-up at a mean of 4.3 years (range 3.2-5.8 years). There was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful difference in ∆KOOS₄ between preoperative status and latest follow-up (PAD = 41, CON = 43; p = 0.5). There was no difference in mean ∆WOMAC scores (PAD = 39, CON = 41; p = 0.9) or ∆KOOS subscales between groups. In addition, there were no differences in complications or reoperations between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PAD was not superior to CON in improving patient-reported outcomes or reducing complications and reoperation rates at medium term follow-up. The use of PAD in TKA to improve clinical outcomes alone cannot be justified based on the results of this study.

The Use of Computer Navigation and Robotic Technology in Complex Total Knee Arthroplasty

»

The potential benefits of computer-assisted surgical (CAS) navigation and robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems, such as increased reliability of restoring the mechanical axis, fewer outliers, more rapid hospital discharge, less physical therapy requirements, decreased blood loss, and decreased revision rates, have led to their application not only in primary cases but also in complex cases such as preoperative deformity and revision.

»

Early evidence demonstrates that CAS navigation may help to improve alignment in complex cases of femoral and tibial deformity and in cases of femoral bowing.

»

Data regarding deformity correction with robotic systems are similar to CAS navigation with regard to alignment, but are more limited. There are also scant data regarding revision cases and cases of previous intramedullary canal instrumentation.

»

Concerns remain regarding cost, learning curves, and operative times. There are potential long-term cost savings associated with a decrease in revisions and readmissions that require additional investigation.

»

Early evidence for the use of these emerging technologies for deformity correction and revision cases is promising, but their impact on long-term functional outcomes remains to be demonstrated. Additional well-designed comparative studies are warranted.

Conventional computed tomography software can be used for accurate pre-operative templating in bipolar hip arthroplasty: A preliminary report

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of pre-operative templating for bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) for displaced femoral neck fracture using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) of computed tomography (CT) images.

METHODS

Nineteen patients who underwent BHA were enrolled in this study. For pre- and post-operative evaluation, a CT scan was performed from the pelvis to the knee joints. MPR of the CT image was done using software to measure the femoral head cup diameter, offset, stem size, length of the modular neck, distance from the neck osteotomy, and femoral anteversion. We compared these parameters pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

Both the femoral head cup diameter and length of the modular neck were found to be significantly different between pre- and post-operative measurements, although the differences were minor. Other parameters, including the femoral offset, were not significantly different between the pre- and post-operative measurements. The size of the femoral stem, cup diameter, and length of the modular neck were consistent with the planned size and accurate (within ±1 size) in more than 84% cases.

CONCLUSION

Our pre-operative templating approach for BHA using MPR of CT has potential clinical utility as a complementary tool for pre-operative planning using three-dimensional templating software. Moreover, this technique could be feasible in most hospitals without additional expenditure.

Improved implant alignment accuracy with an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the accuracy of tibial implant alignment using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

This retrospective matched case-control study reviewed 51 UKAs performed using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system, matched with 51 UKAs performed using conventional extramedullary rods. Coronal alignment and posterior slope of the tibial implant were measured on postoperative radiographs, and differences from preoperative planning were examined. Outliers and accuracy of tibial implant alignment were compared between the portable navigation and conventional groups using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively.

RESULTS

In the portable navigation group, 100% of the implants were aligned within 3.0° of both target coronal and sagittal implant alignment. In the conventional group, 76.5% and 88.2% of the implants were within 3.0° of both target coronal and sagittal implant alignment. Statistical analysis revealed that outliers of coronal and sagittal alignment were significantly less in the portable navigation group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05). In addition, the absolute value difference between postoperative measurement and preoperative planning of both coronal and sagittal alignment was significantly smaller in the portable navigation group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The portable navigation system improved the accuracy of tibial implant alignment in UKA. We found that 100% of the implants were aligned within 3.0° of both target coronal and sagittal implant alignment. The portable navigation system decreased the outliers of tibial coronal and sagittal alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case-control study, Level III.

Accuracy of cup orientation and learning curve of the accelerometer-based portable navigation system for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of cup orientation and learning curve of the disposable accelerometer-based portable navigation system for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position.

METHODS

A total of 75 patients who underwent THA through the anterolateral supine approach (ALS) with an accelerometer-based portable navigation system for the supine position (HipAlign^®) between July 2017 and October 2018 were analyzed in this study. We compared the intraoperative cup angles using navigation records with the postoperative angles using postoperative computed tomography (CT) data. All patients were categorized into the following groups according to the course of three discrete, sequential operative time periods: 1-25 (initial group), 26-50 (intermediate group), and 51-75 (recent group). We compared the accuracy of cup inclination and anteversion among the three groups. The time required for navigation and the operative time of all patients were measured.

RESULTS

The average absolute error in measurement (postoperative CT-navigation record) was 2.6° ± 2.7° (inclination) and 2.8° ± 2.7° (anteversion). There were no significant differences among the three groups. The average time required for navigation and the operative time were 365.1 ± 90.3 s and 76.1 ± 1.6 min, respectively. The required time for HipAlign^® navigation and operative time were constant in most patients, except for those of the initial five cases.

CONCLUSION

The accelerometer-based portable navigation system provides good accuracy of cup orientation, has a short learning curve, and requires a minimal surgical time for THA in supine position.

Monitoring hip posture in total hip arthroplasty using an inertial measurement unit-based hip smart trial system: An in vitro validation experiment using a fixed pelvis model

Intraoperative measurement of hip posture is the basis for assessing hip range of motion (ROM) and predicting postoperative functional limits allowable for activities of daily living. Although computer navigation for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has improved the accuracy of intraoperative ROM evaluation, it has not gained widespread popularity due to its complex and time-consuming protocol. We therefore developed an inertial measurement unit-based hip smart trial system (IMUHST) for intraoperative monitoring of hip posture. An in vitro validation experiment was conducted using bone models with a three-dimensional measurement model as the reference standard. The absolute mean error, Bland - Altman analysis and intra-class correlation coefficient demonstrated that the validity and reliability of this system meets the requirement for clinical application. Given that monitoring posture is the basis for evaluating the direction(s) of potential impingement, subluxation and dislocation, the IMUHST is a promising development direction of computer assisted surgery in THA.

Comparison of iASSIST Navigation System with Conventional Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes

The iASSIST navigation system is a handheld accelerometer‐based navigation system that has been applied in clinical practice in recent five years. This meta‐analysis aimed to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of iASSIST navigation with conventional surgical techniques for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to compare the surgery time between an iASSIST group and a conventional treatment group. This systematic review and meta‐analysis included all comparative prospective and retrospective studies published in Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Web of Science and the CNKI databases over the past 20 years. Inclusion criteria were studies that compared the iASSIST navigation system with conventional TKA. The primary outcomes were mechanical axis (MA) and outliers, which means postoperative MA varus or valgus of more than 3°. Secondary outcomes were coronal femoral angle (CFA) and coronal tibial angle (CTA). Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate functional outcome. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Eight studies involving 558 knees were included in this meta‐analysis. Of these, 275 patients used the iASSIST navigation system and 283 used conventional surgical techniques. A total of 5 studies were considered high quality and the other 3 were considered to be of moderate quality. The occurrence of malalignment of >3° in the iASSIST group was 13.3%, compared with 29.04% in the conventional group. Postoperative MA of the iASSIST group was significantly better than that of the conventional group (I² = 19%, OR = −0.92, 95% CI = −1.09 to −0.75, P < 0.00001). The iASSIST navigation system provided significantly increased accuracy in the coronal femoral angle (I² = 79%, OR = −0.88, 95% CI = −1.21 to −0.54, P < 0.00001) and the coronal tibial angle (I² = 34%, OR = 0.39, 95% CI = −0.48 to −0.30, P < 0.00001) compared with conventional techniques. However, the duration of surgery using the iASSIST procedure was longer and there was no significant difference in the short‐term KSS in the iASSIST group compared with the conventional group. We found that when pooling the data of included studies, the number of outliers was fewer in the iASSIST group, and compared with conventional TKA techniques, the iASSIST system significantly improved the accuracy of lower limb alignment but the duration of surgery was prolonged in addition to there being no apparent advantage in terms of short‐term functional score.

Preoperative planned distance between the skin surface and the guide rod provides accurate posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although sagittal tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important, no landmark exists to achieve reproducible slope. It is theoretically demonstrated that the preoperative planned distance between the skin surface and the rod can be a useful guide for the tibial slope in the previous imaging study. We conducted this retrospective study to confirm whether the results of the study are repeatable in an intra-operative situation.

METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive TKAs using the distance from the extramedullary cutting guide rod to the skin surface as a reference guide for the tibial slope were performed and tibial component positioning was compared with 55 knees performed using the accelerometer-based portable navigation. The tibial component alignment was evaluated with a computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) software.

RESULTS

The absolute mean deviation from the targeted slope in the proposed method was significantly smaller than the portable navigation (1.0° and 1.7°, respectively, p = 0.0025). The outlier rate beyond 3° was 0% in the proposed technique (16.4% in the portable navigation, p = 0.0014).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative planned distance between the skin surface and the guide rod is a useful technique to provide accurate posterior tibial slope in TKA.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Extra-Articular Deformity: Restoration of Mechanical Alignment Using Accelerometer-Based Navigation System

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with post-traumatic extra-articular deformity (EAD) is difficult to manage using conventional instrumentation techniques. In this study, we evaluate whether accelerometer navigation system can be a valuable option to make accurate bone resections and restore the neutral mechanical axis in complex TKA patients with EAD.

METHODS

From May 2015 to June 2017, 18 consecutive TKA were performed in 18 patients with knee osteoarthritis with associated EAD. An accelerometer-based navigation system was used to guide tibial and femoral resection in the coronal and sagittal plane. Postoperative lower limb alignment in coronal plane and component position in coronal and sagittal plane was measured through full-leg weight-bearing X-ray. Clinical score were recorded using the Knee Society Score at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean hip-knee-ankle angle was 0.9° ± 1.4° varus alignment. The coronal alignment of the femoral component was 89.2° ± 1.9°, and the coronal alignment of the tibial component was 89.4° ± 2.1°. The sagittal alignment of the femoral component was 93.2°± 1.9°, and the sagittal alignment of the tibial component was 84.4° ± 3.1°. At the final follow-up, the Knee Society Score was 89 points (range, 82-100), and the functional score was 86.7 points (range, 60-100). No intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications were reported using this technology.

CONCLUSION

Accelerometer-based navigation is accurate in achieving neutral mechanical alignment and optimal implant position after TKA in patients with EAD. This system should be considered a valuable option to the more complex technique of computer navigation or robotic surgery.

Current concepts and future perspectives in computer-assisted navigated total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Total knee replacements (TKR) aim to restore stability of the tibiofemoral and patella-femoral joints and provide relief of pain and improved quality of life for the patient. In recent years, computer-assisted navigation systems have been developed with the aim of reducing human error in joint alignment and improving patient outcomes.

METHODS

We examined the current body of evidence surrounding the use of navigation systems and discussed their current and future role in TKR.

RESULTS

The current body of evidence shows that the use of computer navigation systems for TKR significantly reduces outliers in the mechanical axis and coronal prosthetic position. Also, navigation systems offer an objective assessment of soft tissue balancing that had previously not been available. Although these benefits represent a technical superiority to conventional TKR techniques, there is limited evidence to show long-term clinical benefit with the use of navigation systems, with only a small number of studies showing improvement in outcome scores at short-term follow-up. Because of the increased costs and operative time associated with their use as well as the emergence of more affordable and patient-specific technologies, it is unlikely for navigation systems to become more widely used in the near future.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst this technology helps surgeons to achieve improved component positioning, it is important to consider the clinical and functional implications, as well as the added costs and potential learning curve associated with adopting new technology.

Similar radiological results with accelerometer-based navigation versus conventional technique in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The Zimmer iASSIST system is an accelerometer-based, portable navigation device for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that does not require the use of a large console for alignment feedback as required in computer-assisted surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the accelerometer-based system in component positioning and overall mechanical alignment.

METHODS

Two groups of 30 patients each with primary osteoarthritis underwent TKA using either conventional method or Zimmer iASSIST navigation in 2013 was retrospectively studied. Patients were matched according to body mass index (BMI), gender and age. A senior arthroplasty surgeon performed all the operation using the same surgical approach. Perioperative and post-operative regimens were the same. All patients had standardized radiographs performed post-operatively to determine the lower limb mechanical alignment and component placement.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups for age, BMI, gender, side of operated knee and preoperative mechanical axis ( p > 0.05). There was no difference in the proportion of outliers for mechanical axis ( p = 0.38), coronal femoral angle ( p = 0.50), coronal tibia angle ( p = 0.11), sagittal femoral angle ( p = 0.28) and sagittal tibia angle ( p = 0.33). The duration of surgery, post-operative drop in haemoglobin level and transfusion incidence did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups ( p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our article showed that iASSIST was safe and remains a useful tool to restore mechanical axis. However, our data demonstrated no difference in lower limb alignment and component placement between the TKA that used accelerometer-based system and those that underwent conventional method.

Total knee arthroplasties from the origin to navigation: history, rationale, indications

Since the early 1970s, total knee arthroplasties have undergone many changes in both their design and their surgical instrumentation. It soon became apparent that to improve prosthesis durability, it was essential to have instruments which allowed them to be fitted reliably and consistently. Despite increasingly sophisticated surgical techniques, preoperative objectives were only met in 75% of cases, which led to the development, in the early 1990s, in Grenoble (France), of computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery for knee prosthesis implantation. In the early 2000s, many navigation systems emerged, some including pre-operative imagery ("CT-based"), others using intra-operative imagery ("fluoroscopy-based"), and yet others with no imagery at all ("imageless"), which soon became the navigation "gold standard". They use an optoelectronic tracker, markers which are fixed solidly to the bones and instruments, and a navigation workstation (computer), with a control system (e.g. pedal). Despite numerous studies demonstrating the benefit of computer navigation in meeting preoperative objectives, such systems have not yet achieved the success they warrant, for various reasons we will be covering in this article. If the latest navigation systems prove to be as effective as the older systems, they should give this type of technology a well-deserved boost.

Radiographic assessment and clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device

It has been reported that an accelerometer-based portable navigation device can achieve accurate bone cuts, but there have been few studies of clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using such a device. The aim of this study was to evaluate lower limb alignment and clinical outcomes after TKA using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device. Thirty-five patients (40 knees) underwent primary TKAs using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device. Postoperative radiographic assessments included the hip-knee-ankle angle, femoral component angle (FCA), and tibial component angle (TCA) in the coronal plane and the sagittal FCA and sagittal TCA in the sagittal plane. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for osteoarthritic knees, Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure, and the New Knee Society Score. The frequency of outliers (>3 degrees) was 10% for the hip-knee-ankle angle, 8% for FCA, 0% for TCA, 19% for sagittal FCA, and 9% for sagittal TCA. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score and Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure were significantly improved postoperatively. The postoperative New Knee Society Score was 67.2% for symptoms, 50.3% for satisfaction, 58.6% for expectation, and 44.1% for function. TKA using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device achieved good results for both lower limb alignment and clinical outcomes.

Accelerometer-Based and Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Reduction in Mechanical Axis Outliers Does Not Lead to Improvement in Functional Outcomes or Quality of Life When Compared to Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Accelerometer-based navigation (ABN) is a novel navigation system that attempts to combine the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) with the familiarity of conventional instrumentation (CON). No studies have compared the clinical outcomes of this new technology with existing techniques to date.

METHODS

From July 2013 to April 2014, 152 consecutive patients (152 knees) underwent total knee arthroplasty using ABN (n = 38), CAS (n = 38), or CON (n = 76). We prospectively matched the groups in a 1:1:2 ratio for age, gender, body mass index, preoperative range of motion, Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, Short-Form 36 Physical and Mental Component Scores, and preoperative deformity using preoperative data in isolation, thus controlling for potential confounding factors. All patients were prospectively followed for 2 years.

RESULTS

The ABN and CAS groups had a significantly improved mean mechanical axis (P = .018), femoral (P = .050) and tibial component alignment (P = .008) compared to the CON group. There were significantly less mechanical axis outliers in the ABN and CAS groups (P = .034). The duration of surgery for the ABN group (83.9 ± 21 min) was significantly shorter than the CAS group (101 ± 11 min; P < .001) but similar to the CON group (76.6 ± 17 min; P = .131). There was no significant difference in functional outcomes, quality of life measures or satisfaction rates between the 3 groups at 2 years (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Although bone cuts were as accurate as CAS and operation time was similar to CON, the use of ABN failed to demonstrate any advantages in clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty at 2 years follow-up.

Technical Considerations and Accuracy Improvement of Accelerometer-Based Portable Computer Navigation for Performing Distal Femoral Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Accelerometer-based computer navigation has been shown to be highly accurate for performing distal femoral and proximal tibial component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), although the procedure for the femoral component is less accurate than for the tibial component.

METHODS

First, 30 knees without hip osteoarthritis or proximal femoral surgeries were selected. Sequential hip adduction, abduction, and flexion were performed, and the femoral head was monitored fluoroscopically in the coronal plane before TKA. Significantly more movement was detected during hip adduction than during abduction and flexion. Then, postoperative femoral and tibial component alignment was retrospectively evaluated in 48 TKAs before fluoroscopic monitoring (early group) and in the next 61 TKAs with femoral registration using smaller adduction movements to avoid large femoral head movements (later group). Another 47 TKAs treated with the conventional intramedullary method for the distal femoral component and the extramedullary method for the proximal tibial component were also analyzed (IM and EM group) for historic control.

RESULTS

Significantly large variances in the femoral component implantation of the early group were detected in both the coronal and sagittal planes. The sagittal femoral implantation angle of the early group (4.6 ± 3.0°) was significantly larger than that of the later group (3.2 ± 1.8°) when 3.5° was the target for both groups. No significant difference was detected in the variances of either the coronal or sagittal tibial component implantation, although the coronal tibial implantation angle was significantly smaller (-1.3 ± 1.3°valgus) in the early group than in the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Accelerometer-based navigation sometimes has technical issues during registration associated with hip adduction. We showed that femoral registration without large adduction movements will enable more accurate femoral implantation. Surgeons should also keep in mind that the coronal tibial component is likely to be in valgus alignment (about 1°) even if a neutral angle (0°) is selected with this particular device.

Computer-assisted stereotaxic navigation improves the accuracy of mechanical alignment and component positioning in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

This study reports on a novel computer-assisted stereotaxic navigation (CASN) system that attempts to combine the accuracy of computer navigation with familiarity of conventional methods. We hypothesize that CASN would improve mechanical alignment and component positioning when compared to conventional instrumentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

145 patients (192 knees) retrospectively matched for age, BMI, gender and pre-operative scores, underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using CASN (n = 92) or conventional instrumentation (n = 100). Pre- and post-operative radiological alignment [Acceptable ranges: mechanical axis (MA) 0° ± 3°, coronal femoral-component angle (CFA) and coronal tibia-component angle (CTA) 90° ± 3°] and clinical outcomes (Knee Society Scores, Oxford Knee Score and Short Form-36) at 6 months were examined.

RESULTS

The CASN group had significantly improved mean MA (1.9° ± 1.4°, versus 2.8° ± 2.0° in the conventional group, p = 0.001), CFA (1.6° ± 1.3°, versus 2.1° ± 1.5° in the conventional group, p = 0.035) and CTA (1.6° ± 1.2°, versus 2.1° ± 1.5° in the conventional group, p = 0.024). 91.3 % of knees in the CASN group were within 3° of a neutral mechanical axis, versus 74 % in the conventional group (p < 0.001). The duration of surgery was significantly longer in the CASN group (84 ± 22 vs 73 ± 15 min, p = 0.001) and cost an additional USD 850 per operation. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or satisfaction rates at 6 months post-operatively (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CASN improved TKA mechanical alignment and component positioning, however, resulted in longer and costlier surgery with no benefits in short-term functional outcomes, despite providing familiarity to surgeons accustomed to conventional instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Radiographic outcomes in the coronal plane with iASSIST™ versus optical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: A preliminary case-control study

BACKGROUND

The new navigation system iASSIST™ for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relies on accelerometers and gyroscopes. The objective of this prospective study was to compare the accuracy of iASSIST™ to that of the conventional optical navigation system Navitrack™ by determining the rate of mechanical axis restoration (±3°), postoperative mean mechanical alignment, rate of adequate femoral and tibial component positioning, mean operative time, and occurrence of navigation-related adverse events.

HYPOTHESIS

The rate of mechanical axis restoration (±3°) is not lower with iASSIST™ than with the conventional navigation system Navitrack™.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 40 patients who underwent primary TKA between October 2013 and March 2014, 20 had navigation using iASSIST™ and 20 using Navitrack™. Six months after TKA, an independent observer measured three parameters on coronal radiographs: the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA).

RESULTS

The two groups showed no significant differences for the rates of HKA restoration (P=0.3), adequate coronal positioning of the femoral component (P=0.12) and tibial component (P=0.12), or optimal success (P=0.09). Significant differences in favour of iASSIST™ were demonstrated for the values and angular deviations of the HKA (P=0.02) and mMPTA (P=0.01), whereas no significant difference was found for mLDFA. There were no significant differences regarding the mean operative time (P=0.06) or the occurrence of navigation-related adverse events (P=0.18).

DISCUSSION

The iASSIST™ system provides a neutral mechanical axis and optimal component position in the coronal plane in 95% of cases, indicating that it is as accurate as the optical navigation system Navitrack™.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, prospective case-control study.

Accelerometer-Based Navigation Is as Accurate as Optical Computer Navigation in Restoring the Joint Line and Mechanical Axis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Matched Study

The Zimmer iASSIST system is a novel accelerometer-based navigation system for TKA. 76 patients (76 knees) were prospectively matched for age, BMI, gender, diagnosis, and pre-operative scores, and underwent TKA using the iASSIST (n=38) or optical CAS (n=38). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or satisfaction rates at six months post-operatively (P>0.05). Mechanical axis was 1.8±1.3° in the iASSIST cohort versus 2.1±1.6° in the CAS cohort (P=0.543). There were no significant differences in number of outliers for mechanical axis (P=1.000), coronal femoral-component angle (P=0.693), coronal tibial-component angle (P=0.204) or joint line deviation (P=1.000). The duration of surgery was significantly longer in the CAS group (P<0.001), while the added cost of accelerometer-based navigation was approximately $1000 per operation.

Using the anatomical tibial axis for total knee arthroplasty alignment may lead to an internal rotation error

INTRODUCTION

Despite intensive research, current total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs do not always provide the correct kinematics for the native joint and thus further optimisation is necessary. Several studies support the importance of malrotation of the tibial components in the failure of TKA. We hypothesise that using the anatomical tibial axis (ATA) to align tibial component rotation on the resected tibial surface may lead to an internal rotation error due to relative anterior shift of the lateral articular surface centre compared to the medial one. The aim of this study was to compare the anatomical tibial axis of the physiological tibial joint surface to the resected one.

METHOD

Twenty formalin-fixed cadaveric knees were obtained for study. After computed tomography scanning the data of each specimen were entered into a standardised coordinate system and virtual bone cuts were performed with 6, 8 and 10 mm resection depths. The positions of the articular surface centres were determined at each resection depth.

RESULTS

The lateral articular surface centre had moved anteriorly after the resection by a mean 1.475 mm, while the medial one had not changed significantly. Resecting the tibia at a 6-mm cut and using the transverse tibial axis to align the prosthetic tibial plateau will result in a mean 4.0° (95 % confidence interval, 2.5-5.5°) of internal rotation compared to the uncut tibia.

DISCUSSION

The ATA lies in 6 degrees of external rotation compared to the perpendicular to the posterior tibial condylar axis (PTCA). Graw et al. suggest aligning the tibial component in 10 degrees of external rotation to the latter. Thus, if we accept the above suggestion, the ATA is 4 degrees internally rotated compared to the same line on the resected proximal tibia. These prior studies appear to be in accordance with our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that using the ATA on the resected tibial surface may contribute to an internal rotation error.

Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

We report the six year implant survivorship, tibial component alignment and knee and limb function measured by the Oxford Knee Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index ((WOMAC) score after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and tested the hypothesis that varus alignment of the tibial component, knee, or limb does not adversely affect implant survival and function.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 214 consecutive patients (219 knees) treated with a kinematically aligned TKA in 2007. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and revision rate per 100 component years determined implant failure. The Oxford Knee Score (0 worst, 48 best) and WOMAC score (0 worst, 100 best) were used to measure function. We categorised tibial component alignment as in-range (≤ 0°) or varus (>0°), knee alignment as in-range (between -2.5° and -7.4°), varus (>-2.5°), or valgus (<-7.4°), and limb alignment as in-range (0° ± 3°), varus (>3°) or valgus (<-3°).

RESULTS

At a mean of 6.3 years (range, 5.8-7.2), implant survivorship was 97.5 % and revision-rate per 100 component years 0.40. Three implants had been revised (deep infection one, loose tibial component one and patella instability [1); two loose patella components were pending revision and considered failures. The average Oxford Knee Score was 43 and WOMAC 91. Function of tibial components (80 %), knees (31 %) and limbs (7 %) that were aligned in varus was similar to patients aligned in-range.

CONCLUSIONS

At a mean of 6.3 years after kinematically aligned TKA, varus alignment of the tibial component, knee and limb did not adversely affect implant survival or function, which supports the consideration of kinematic alignment as an alternative to mechanical alignment for performing primary TKA. Level of evidence, III; therapeutic study.