Total knee arthroplasty in patients with a history of illicit intravenous drug abuse

Smokeless Tobacco Use is Associated With Worse Medical and Surgical Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated increased complication risk after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who smoke cigarettes. It is unclear if smokeless tobacco use confers a similar impact. The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate rates of postoperative complications after THA in smokeless tobacco users and people who smoke compared to matched controls, and (2) compare rates of postoperative complications in smokeless tobacco users versus patients who smoke.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large national database. For patients who underwent primary THA, smokeless tobacco users (n = 950) and people who smoke (n = 21,585) were matched 1:4 with controls (n = 3,800 and 86,340, respectively), and smokeless tobacco users (n = 922) were matched 1:4 with people who smoke (n = 3,688). Joint complication rates within 2 years and medical complications within 90 days postoperatively were compared using multivariable logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Within 90 days of primary THA, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly higher rates of wound disruption, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury (AKI), cardiac arrest, transfusion, readmission and longer length of stay compared to tobacco naïve controls. Within 2 years, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly higher rates of prosthetic joint dislocations and overall joint-related complications compared to tobacco naïve controls.

CONCLUSION

Smokeless tobacco use is associated with higher rates of medical- and joint-related complications following primary THA. Smokeless tobacco use may be under-diagnosed in patients undergoing elective THA. Surgeons may consider delineating between smoking and smokeless tobacco use during preoperative counseling.

Outcomes of medicaid patients undergoing TJA with previous positive urine toxicology screens

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with positive preoperative urine toxicology (utox) screens prior to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have higher readmission rates, greater complication rates, and longer hospital stays compared to patients with negative screens. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of postponing surgery for patients with positive preoperative utox in the Medicaid population.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study reviewed the Medicaid ambulatory database at a large, academic orthopedic specialty hospital for patients with a utox screen prior to TJA from 2012 to 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups: (1) controls with negative preoperative utox or a utox consistent with prescription medications (Utox-) with TJA completed as scheduled; (2) positive preoperative utox with TJA rescheduled and surgery completed on a later date (R-utox+); (3) positive preoperative utox inconsistent with prescription medications with TJA completed as scheduled (S-utox+). Primary outcomes included mortality, 90-day readmission rate, complication rate, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Of the 300 records reviewed, 185 did not meet inclusion criteria. The remaining 115 patients included 80 (69.6%) Utox-, 5 (6.3%) R-utox+, and 30 (37.5%) S-utox+. Mean follow-up time was 49.6 months. Hospital stays trended longer in the Utox- group (3.7 ± 2.0 days vs. 3.1 ± 1.6 S-utox+ vs.2.5 ± 0.4 R-utox+, p = 0.20). Compared to the R-utox+group, the S-utox+ group trended toward lower home discharge rates (p = 0.20), higher in-hospital complication rates (p = 0.85), and more all-cause 90-day emergency department visits (p = 0.57). There were no differences in postoperative opioid utilization between groups (p = 0.319). Duration of postoperative narcotic use trended toward being longer in the Utox- patients (820.7 ± 1073.8 days vs. 684.6 ± 1491.8 S-utox+ vs. 585.1 ± 948.3 R-utox+, p = 0.585). Surgical time (p = 0.045) and revision rates (p = 0.72) trended toward being higher in the S-utox+ group.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid patients with positive preoperative utox who had surgeries postponed trended towards shorter hospital stays and greater home discharge rates. Larger studies should be conducted to analyze the implications of a positive preoperative utox on risk profiles and outcomes following TJA in the Medicaid population. Study design Retrospective cohort study.

Put Down the Tin: Chewing Tobacco Use Is Associated With Worse Outcomes After Primary Lumbar Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the impact of chewing tobacco on both medical and spine-related complication rates after spinal lumbar fusions in comparison to both a control cohort and a smoking cohort.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Smoking is a prevalent modifiable risk factor that has been demonstrated to be associated with increased complications after lumbar fusion. Although smoking rates have decreased in the United States, chewing tobacco use has not similarly reduced. Despite chewing tobacco delivering up to 4 times the dose of smoking, the impact of chewing tobacco is incompletely understood.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion and used chewing tobacco were matched with a control cohort and a smoking cohort. Medical complications within 90 days after primary lumbar fusion were evaluated, including deep venous thrombosis, acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, transfusion, acute myocardial infarction, and inpatient readmission. Spine-related complications were evaluated at 2 years postoperatively, including pseudoarthrosis, incision and drainage (I&D), instrument failure, revision, and infection.

RESULTS

After primary lumbar fusion, the chewing tobacco cohort demonstrated significantly higher rates of pseudoarthrosis [odds ratio (OR): 1.41], revision (OR: 1.57), and any spine-related complication (OR: 1.32) compared with controls. The smoking cohort demonstrated significantly higher rates of pseudoarthrosis (OR: 1.88), I&D (OR: 1.27), instrument failure (OR: 1.39), revision (OR: 1.54), infection (OR: 1.34), and any spine-related complication (OR: 1.77) compared with controls. The chewing tobacco cohort demonstrated significantly lower rates of pseudoarthrosis (OR: 0.84), I&D (OR: 0.49), infection (OR: 0.70), and any spine-related complication (OR: 0.81) compared with the smoking cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that chewing tobacco is associated with higher rates of both spine-related and medical complications after primary lumbar fusion. However, chewing tobacco use is associated with less risk of complications compared with smoking.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Smokeless Tobacco Use is Associated With Worse Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated increased complication risk after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who smoke cigarettes, but it is unclear if smokeless tobacco use confers a similar impact. The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate rates of postoperative complications after TKA in smokeless tobacco users and smokers as compared to matched controls, and (2) compare rates of postoperative complications in smokeless tobacco users versus smokers to determine if one is associated with significantly higher rates of postoperative complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national database. For patients who underwent primary TKA, smokeless tobacco users (n = 1,535) and smokers (n = 28,953) were matched at a 1:4 with controls (n = 6,140 and 115,812, respectively), and smokeless tobacco users (n = 1,481) were matched at a 1:4 with smokers (n = 5,924). Rates of joint complications within 2 years and medical complications within 90 days postoperatively were compared using multivariable logistic regressions.

RESULTS

After primary TKA, compared to controls, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly higher rates of aseptic loosening/mechanical failure within 2 years, longer lengths of stay, and higher rates of urinary tract infection, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, and acute kidney injury within 90 days. Compared to smokers, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly lower rates of aseptic revision and lower rates of wound disruption.

CONCLUSION

Smokeless tobacco use is associated with higher rates of both medical and joint complications following primary TKA. However, smoking is associated with higher risk for complications than smokeless tobacco use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Rates and Outcomes of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Persons Who Inject Drugs

BACKGROUND

The risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is higher in persons who inject drugs (PWID) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), though reported rates vary widely. This study was designed to assess outcomes of TJA in PWID and to describe factors associated with improved PJI outcomes among PWID.

METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study was performed using a 1:4 match among those with and those without a history of injection drug use (IDU) undergoing TJA. Demographic, surgical, and outcome variables were compared in multivariate logistic regressions to determine PJI predictors. Kaplan-Meier analyses were constructed to characterize the difference in survival of patients who did not have PJI or undergo joint explantation between PWID and the matching cohort.

RESULTS

PWID had a 9-fold increased risk of PJI compared to the matched cohort (odds ratio 9.605, 95% CI 2.781-33.175, P < .001). Ten of 17 PWID whose last use was within 6 months (active use) of primary TJA had a PJI, while 7 of 41 PWID who did not have active use developed a PJI. Of PWID with PJI, treatment failure was seen in 15 of 17, while in patients who did not have an IDU history, 5 of 8 with PJI had treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

IDU is a significant risk factor for PJI following TJA. Future work investigating the effect of a multidisciplinary support team to assist in cessation of IDU and to provide social support may improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in this vulnerable population.

Outcomes of revision arthroplasty for hip joint infection in matched groups of HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients

BACKGROUND

Several studies reported on periprosthetic infection after primary THA in HIV-positive patients, but very few showed the results of its revision.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare primary and secondary clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty for hip joint infection in matched groups of HIV-infected and HIV-negative patients.

METHODS

Using the hospital database, thirteen HIV-positive patients (13 infected hips) and thirteen HIV-negative patients of the matched control group (13 infected hips) were identified and their records were studied retrospectively. They underwent revision surgery aimed at infection arrest and total hip replacement due to infection developed after primary THA or infected spacers. Harris Hip Score, reinfection rate, limb shortening, and definite outcomes were evaluated with Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Spacers with antibiotics were implanted in patients of both groups at the first step of revision, except one HIV-infected patient who had resection arthroplasty. The mean follow-up was 29.4±2.7 and 33.±2.9 months for the HIV-group and control group, respectively. Three patients of the HIV-group completed two-stage revision arthroplasty versus ten patients from the control group. Re-infection rate was higher in the HIV-group. At final follow-ups, the mean HHS was significantly different (53±3.2 points in the HIV-group versus 79.14±3.1 points in the control group) along with limb length discrepancy (3.71±0.43 versus 1.4±0.32).

CONCLUSION

Both primary and secondary clinical outcomes of revision arthroplasty for hip joint infection in HIV-positive patients were significantly worse than in the matched group of HIV-negative patients. Revisions in HIV-positive group resulted in a higher reinfection rate, a small number of definite two-stage revisions, and lower functional scores.

Association of Preoperative Opioid Use With Complication Rates and Resource Use in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background

Preoperative opioid use has been shown to be a negative predictor of patient outcomes, complication rates, and resource utilization in a variety of different orthopaedic procedures. To date, there are no studies investigating its effect on outcomes after hip arthroscopy in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Purpose

To determine the association of preoperative opioid use with postoperative outcomes after hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database was queried for all patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI between 2011 and 2018. Opioid prescriptions filled in the 6 months preceding surgery were queried, and the average daily oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) in this period were computed for each patient. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts: opioid naïve, <1 OME per day, 1 to 5 OMEs per day, and >5 OMEs per day. Postoperative 90-day complications, health care utilization, perioperative costs, postoperative opioid use, and 1- and 3-year revision rates were then compared among cohorts.

Results

A total of 22,124 patients were ultimately included in this study; 31.2% of these patients were prescribed opioids preoperatively. Overall, the percentage of preoperative opioid-naïve patients increased from 64.5% in 2011 to 78.9% in 2018. Patients who received preoperative opioids had a higher rate of complications, increased resource utilization, and increased revision rates. Specifically, on multivariate analysis, patients taking >5 OMEs per day (compared with patients who were preoperatively opioid naïve) had increased odds of a postoperative emergency department visit (Odds Ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.94-2.56; P < .001), 90-day readmission (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.77-2.87; P < .001), increased acute postoperative opioid use (OR, 25.56; 95% CI, 22.98-28.43; P < .001), prolonged opioid use (OR, 10.45; 95% CI, 8.92-12.25; P < .001), and 3-year revision surgery (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.36-3.36; P < .001). Perioperative adjusted costs were increased for all preoperative opioid users and were highest for the >5 OMEs per day cohort ($6255; 95% CI, $5143-$7368).

Conclusion

A large number of patients with FAI are prescribed opioids before undergoing hip arthroscopy, and use of these pain medications is associated with increased health care utilization, increased costs, prolonged opioid use, and early revision surgery.

Risk factor analysis for above-knee amputation in patients with periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a case-control study

Background

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following knee arthroplasty. Therapeutic strategies comprise a combination of surgical and antibiotic treatment modalities and aim to eradicate the infection. Sometimes control of the disease can only be attained by above-knee amputation (AKA). While a vast amount of literature exists illuminating predisposing factors for PJI, risk factors favoring the endpoint AKA in this context are sparsely known.

Methods

The purpose of this investigation was to delineate whether patients with PJI of the knee present specific risk factors for AKA. In a retrospective case-control study 11 cases of PJI treated with AKA were compared to 57 cases treated with limb salvage (LS). The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Comorbidities, signs and symptoms of the current infection, factors related to previous surgeries and the implant, microbiology, as well as therapy related factors were recorded. Comparative analysis was performed using student’s t-test, chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Binary differences were calculated using odds ratio (OR). Reoperation frequency was compared using Mann-Whitney U test. In-depth descriptive analysis of 11 amputees was carried out.

Results

A total of 68 cases aged 71 ± 11.2 years were examined, 11 of which underwent AKA and 57 had LS. Severe comorbidities (p = 0.009), alcohol abuse (p = 0.015), and preoperative anemia (p = 0.022) were more frequently associated with AKA. Preoperative anemia was found in all 11 amputees (100%) and in 33 of 57 LS patients (58%) with an average preoperative hemoglobin of 99.9 ± 15.1 g/dl compared to 118.2 ± 19.9 g/dl (p = 0.011). No other parameters differed significantly. AKA patients underwent a median of eight (range 2–24) reoperations, LS patients a median of five (range 2–15).

Conclusion

Factors potentially influencing the outcome of knee PJI are diverse. The indication of AKA in this context remains a rarity and a case-by-case decision. Patient-intrinsic systemic factors such as alcohol abuse, severe comorbidities and preoperative anemia may elevate the individual risk for AKA in the setting of PJI. We recommend that anemia, being a condition well amenable to therapeutic measures, should be given special consideration in management of PJI patients.

Trial registration

This study was registered with Kantonale Ethikkommission Zürich, (BASEC-No. 2016–01048).

Preexisting Opioid Use Disorder and Outcomes After Lower Extremity Arthroplasty: A Multistate Analysis, 2007–2014

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine the association of preexisting opioid use disorder and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA, respectively) in the overall population and in the Medicare-only population.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study examined data from the State Inpatient Databases of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project for the years 2007–2014 from California, Florida, New York, Maryland, and Kentucky. We compared patients with and without opioid use disorders on unadjusted rates and calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, length of stay, and 30-day and 90-day readmission status; analyses were repeated in a subgroup of Medicare insurance patients only.

Subjects

After applying our exclusion criteria, our study included 1,422,210 adult patients undergoing lower extremity arthroplasties, including 818,931 Medicare insurance patients. In our study, 0.4% of THA patients and 0.3% of TKA patients had present-on-admission opioid use disorder.

Results

Opioid use disorder patients were at higher risk for in-hospital mortality (aOR = 3.10), 30- and 90-day readmissions (aORs = 1.81, 1.81), and pulmonary and infectious complications (aORs = 1.25, 1.96).

Conclusions

Present-on-admission opioid use disorder was a risk factor for worse postoperative outcomes and increased health care utilization in the lower extremity arthroplasty population. Opioid use disorder is a potentially modifiable risk factor for mortality, postoperative complications, and health care utilization, especially in the at-risk Medicare population.

The Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use Disorder on Complications and Costs following Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction

Multiple studies have demonstrated that patients taking opioids in the preoperative period are at elevated risk for complications following total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. However, the incidence and impact of opioid use disorder (OUD) among these patients—both clinically and fiscally—remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate this relationship.

Methods

The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was used to identify patients undergoing THA and TKA from 2011 to 2015. Coarsened exact matching was used to statistically match the OUD and non-OUD cohorts. Further analysis was then conducted on matched cohorts with multivariate analysis. The incidence of OUD was also determined, and the costs associated with this comorbidity were calculated.

Results

The incidence of OUD in arthroplasty patients increased 80% over the study period. OUD patients had higher odds of prosthetic joint infection (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23–1.94), wound complication (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12–1.76), prosthetic complication (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.10–1.70), and revision surgery (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19–1.81). OUD patients also had longer length of stays (TKA: +0.67 days; THA: +1.09 days), higher readmission (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.43–1.79), and increased 90-day costs (TKA: +$3,602 [95% CI $3,138–4,065]; THA: +4,527 [95% CI $3,593–4,920).

Conclusion

Opioid use disorder is becoming a more common comorbidity among THA and TKA patients. This is concerning as it represents a significant risk factor for postoperative complication. It additionally confers increased perioperative costs. Patients with OUD should be counseled on their elevated risk, and future work will be needed to determine if this is a modifiable risk factor.

Total Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients With a Previously Failed Toxicology Screen: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to review the outcomes of a consecutive series of arthroplasty patients who had previously failed a urine toxicology test. Specifically, we assessed (1) mortality at last follow-up; (2) 90-day readmission and reoperation; (3) rate of complications; and (4) hospital length of stay (LOS) and rates of nonhome discharge.

METHODS

A single-institution, electronic medical record database was queried for primary arthroplasty patients from 2006 to 2017 who had previously failed a day-of-arthroplasty urine toxicology screen. Patients were matched in a 2:1 ratio with toxicology-negative controls.

RESULTS

The mortality rate among toxicology-positive THA patients was 1 of 20 (5%) compared to 0 of 40 among controls (P = .333); the rate of readmission was 3 of 20 (15%) vs 0 of 40 (P = .033); the rate of reoperation was 1 of 20 vs 0 of 40 (P = .333); the rate of surgical complications was 6 of 20 (30%) vs 1 of 40 (2.5%) (P = .004); the rate of medical complication was 4 of 20 (20%) vs 1 of 40 (2.5%) (P = .038); the average LOS was 4 days (range, 1-8 days) vs 2 days (range, 1-10) (P = .002); and the rate of nonhome discharge was 5 of 20 (25%) vs 2 of 40 (5%) patients in the control group (P = .013). The mortality rate among toxicology-positive TKA patients was 1 of 19 (5.3%) compared to 0 of 38 among controls (P = .333); the rate of readmission was 5 of 19 (26.3%) vs 2 of 39 (5.3%) (P = .033); the rate of reoperation was 3 of 19 (15.8%) vs zero (P = .033); the rate of surgical complications was 4 of 21 (21.1%) vs 1 of 38 (2.6%) (P = .038); the rate of medical complications was 5 of 19 (26.3%) vs 2 of 38 (5.3%) (P = .035); the average LOS was 4 days (range, 2-6 days) vs 2 days (range, 1-8 days) (P = .001), the rate of nonhome discharge was 7 of 19 (36.8%) compared to 2 of 38 (5.3%) in the control group (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that toxicology-positive patients require a careful discussion of goals of care before undertaking total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty.

Potential disease burden of patients with substance abuse undergoing major abdominal surgery: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Over 19 million Americans have a substance abuse disorder. The current study sought to characterize the relationship between substance abuse with in-hospital outcomes following major, elective abdominal surgery.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who underwent major abdominal surgery between 2007 to 2014. Patients with preoperative substance abuse, including alcohol, opioids, and non-opioid drugs, were identified. Propensity score matching was used to examine the association of substance abuse with perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 301,659 patients, 7,925 patients (2.6%) had a history of substance abuse. Pancreatectomy was the surgical procedure with the highest proportion of patients with substance abuse history (n = 844, 4.7%). Compared with patients without a substance abuse history, patients with a substance abuse history were more likely to be younger (median age, 60 years [interquartile range (IQR) 52-69] vs 63 years [IQR 52-72]), male (n = 5,438, 67.5% vs n = 132,961, 54.7%), and be in the lowest income category (n = 2,062, 26% vs n = 64,345, 21.9%) (all P < .001). On propensity score matching, substance abuse was associated with increased odds ratio of experiencing a complication (odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-1.82), non-home discharge (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.76-2.16), extended length of stay (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.76-2.02), and higher expenditure (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.49-1.77). Stratified by the type of substance abuse, patients with history of alcohol (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.44-1.71) and drug abuse (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.39) were more likely to experience a complication, whereas only history of alcohol abuse was associated with higher odds ratio of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07-1.79) (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Up to 1 in 50 patients undergoing complex abdominal surgery had a substance abuse history. History of substance abuse was associated with an increased risk of adverse perioperative outcomes and higher healthcare expenditures.