The treatment of chronic radial head dislocation in Monteggia fracture without annular ligament reconstruction

What do we need to address when we treat neglected Monteggia fracture in children

Monteggia fracture is a relatively uncommon injury in pediatric patients, accounting for less than 2% of forearm fractures, characterized by a combination of ulna fracture and radial head dislocation. Neglected Monteggia fractures define as those that have not received treatment within 3 weeks. In children, ulna fractures are easily diagnosed while radial head dislocation may be overlooked, necessitating open reduction after neglecting the Monteggia fracture and potentially causing additional trauma to the child. This study aims to review the pathological characteristics of neglected Monteggia fractures based on the length ratio of the ulna and radius, relative positions between the proximal ends of the ulna and radius, the integrality of annular ligament and the pathological change of proximal radioulnar joint. The findings will provide valuable insights and guidance for managing neglected Monteggia fractures.

Radiocapitellar joint plasty for missed monteggia fracture with radial head deformity in children: a retrospective study

Purpose

The retrospective study reviewed the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with radiocapitellar joint plasty.

Methods

10 children with missed Monteggia fracture (MMF) were reviewed. The average time from injury to operation was 20 months. The average age of children who underwent the operation was 10.5 years. 6 flat and 4 domed radial heads were included. 7 type I and 3 type III MMF were identified based on the Bado classification. All children with MMF were treated by open radial head reduction with radiocapitellar joint plasty and ulnar osteotomy (UO).

Results

The average union time was 4.9 ± 2.6 months. The average osteotomy angle to reduce the radial head was 15.7 ± 3.5°, and the average lengthening of the ulna was 8.2 ± 3.2 mm. The average preoperative flexion range of motion was 110.5 ± 9.1°, and the postoperative flexion range of motion was 138.8 ± 15.1° (p < 0.05). The average preoperative extension range of motion was 10.1 ± 3.2°, and the postoperative extension range of motion was 5.5 ± 3.3° (p < 0.05). The average preoperative pronation range of motion was 78.8 ± 8.7°, while the postoperative pronation range of motion was 81.1 ± 5.6° (p > 0.05). The average preoperative supination range of motion was 68.3 ± 9.7°, and the postoperative supination range of motion was 80.1 ± 7.8° (p < 0.05). The preoperative Kim score was 66.5 ± 10.9°, and the postoperative Kim score was 88.1 ± 12.6 (p < 0.05). The radial head was completely reduced in 9 patients, and subluxation in 1 patient. Osteoarthritis of the radiocapitellar joint was observed in 2 patients.

Conclusions

Radiocapitellar joint plasty is effective surgical intervention for MMF with radial head deformity. It yields favorable functional outcomes while ensuring continued radial head reduction.

Missed Monteggia Injuries in Children and Adolescents: A Treatment Algorithm

Monteggia injuries are rare childhood injuries. In 25-50% of cases, however, they continue to be overlooked, leading to a chronic Monteggia injury. Initially, the chronic Monteggia injury is only characterized by a moderate motion deficit, which is often masked by compensatory movements. Later, however, there is a progressive valgus deformity, neuropathy of the ulnar nerve and a progressive deformity of the radial head ("mushroom deformity") with ultimately painful radiocapitellar arthrosis. In the early stages, when the radial head is not yet deformed and there is no osteoarthritis in the humeroradial joint, these injuries can be treated with reconstruction procedures. This can be achieved either by an osteotomy of the proximal ulna with or without gradual lengthening. If there is already a severe deformity of the radial head and painful osteoarthritis, only rescue procedures such as functional radial head resection or radial head resection with or without hemi-interposition arthroplasty can be used to improve mobility and, above all, to eliminate pain. In this review article, we provide an overview of the current treatment options of chronic Monteggia injury in children and adolescents and present a structured treatment algorithm depending on the chronicity and dysplastic changes.

Ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixator for the treatment of chronic Monteggia fractures in children: comparison between gradual and acute radial head reduction

This study evaluated the outcomes of chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated by ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixator (MEF), and compare the outcome of gradual versus acute radial head reduction. Two groups of patients were identified. Group 1: gradual reduction of the radial head ( n = 13); group 2: acute reduction ( n = 6). Clinical outcome was evaluated by Kim Elbow Score, whereas radiographic outcome was assessed on plain radiographs. The effect of age, side, time from initial trauma to surgery, rate of unplanned surgery, amount of angulation and lengthening, and final outcome were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with good radiographic outcome. Thirteen patients underwent gradual correction of the ulna. The mean duration of correction was 43.4 days (range, 21-82); the mean angulation and lengthening of the ulna were 22.8° (range, 0°-35°) and 22.2 mm (range, 12.2-40.9), respectively. Six patients underwent acute reduction intraoperatively, the mean angulation and lengthening of the ulna were 17.2° (range, 4°-33.9°) and 5.2 mm (range, 2.5-12.2), respectively. CMF treated by ulnar osteotomy and gradual distraction had better radiological outcome (Group 1; 92.3% 12/13) than those treated by acute reduction of the radial head (Group 2; 3/6, 50%) ( P = 0.071). Reoperation rate was found to be significantly correlated with a fair or poor radiographic results ( P = 0.016). Good clinical and radiological outcomes should be expected in CMF patients treated by gradual lengthening and angulation of the ulna with a MEF.

To Angulate or Not to Angulate the Ulna during the Progressive Distraction Period Performed with a Monolateral External Fixator in Paediatric Patients with a Chronic Monteggia Fracture?

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic evolution of chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated by ulnar osteotomy and monolateral external fixators (MEFs) with or without angulation of the ulna during the distraction period. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 20 children (14 boys and 6 girls) with CMFs. According to the strategy of ulnar lengthening, two groups of patients were identified: patients undergoing gradual lengthening with (Group A, n = 11) or without ulna angulation (Group B, n = 9). The mean age at the time of surgery was 7.7 years old (range, 5.4−12.9). The mean time from initial trauma to surgery was 26.3 months (range, 1−96), and the mean follow-up was 24.6 months (range, 5.5−45.4). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Kim et al.’s Elbow Performance Score, while radiographic outcomes were assessed on plain radiographs. Results: Age at surgery, sex, laterality, time between trauma and surgery, and time of follow up in the two groups of patients showed no significant differences. The radial head was successfully reduced in 9 of 9 and 10 of 11 patients in Groups B and A, respectively (p = 1.00). The mean time to achieve radial head reduction was shorter in Group B (18.1 ± 5.3 days) than in Group A (39.2 ± 18.7 days; p = 0.004). The mean angulation of the ulna at the end of treatment was significantly lower in Group B (0.6° ± 1.1°) than in Group A (25.9° ± 6.3°; p < 0.0001). The average ulnar lengthening at the end of treatment in Group B (14.1 ± 5.8 mm) was, on average, 7.7 mm less than that in Group A (21.8 ± 9.7 mm; p = 0.05). The Kim et al. Elbow Performance Score at the last follow-up visit was comparable between the two groups of patients (p = 1.00). Conclusions: A shorter time to achieve radial head reduction and less deformity of the ulna can be expected in paediatric patients with CMFs undergoing intraoperative restoration of ulnar alignment and gradual lengthening without angulation postoperatively.

Finite Element Analysis of Elbow Joint Stability by Different Flexion Angles of the Annular Ligament

Objective

The injury of the annular ligament can change the stress distribution and affect the stability of the elbow joint, but its biomechanical mechanism is unclear. The present study investigated the biomechanical effects of different flexion angles of the annular ligament on elbow joint stability.

Methods

A cartilage and ligament model was constructed using SolidWorks software according to the magnetic resonance imaging results to simulate the annular ligament during normal, loosened, and ruptured conditions at different buckling angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°). The fixed muscle strengths were 40 N (F1), 20 N (F2), 20 N (F3), 20 N (F4), and 20 N (F5) for the triceps, biceps, and brachial tendons and the base of the medial collateral ligament and lateral collateral ligament. The different elbow three‐dimensional (3D) finite element models were imported into ABAQUS software to calculate and analyze the load, contact area, contact stress, and stress of the medial collateral ligament of the olecranon cartilage.

Results

The results showed that the stress value of olecranon cartilage increased under different conditions (normal, loosened, and ruptured annular ligament) with elbow extension, and the maximum stress value of olecranon cartilage was 2.91 ± 0.24 MPa when the annular ligament was ruptured. The maximum contact area of olecranon cartilage was 254  mm² with normal annular ligament when the elbow joint was flexed to 30°, while the maximum contact area of loosened and ruptured annular ligament was 283 and 312 mm² at 60° of elbow flexion, and then decreased gradually. The maximum stress of the medial collateral ligament was 6.52 ± 0.23, 11.51 ± 0.78, and 18.74 ± 0.94 MPa under the different conditions, respectively.

Conclusion

When the annular ligament ruptures, it should be reconstructed as much as possible to avoid the elevation of stress on the surface of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow and the annular cartilage, which may cause clinical symptoms.

Predictors of ideal outcomes after reconstructive surgery for chronic Monteggia fracture in children

BACKGROUND

We aimed to analyze surgical outcomes of reconstructive surgery for chronic Monteggia fracture, which is one of the most challenging problems for orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were followed during 55.6 ± 32.0 months after open reduction of the radial head combined with ulnar osteotomy and annular ligament reconstruction. The mean interval from trauma was 15.1 ± 19.6 months, and the mean age at the surgery was 9.1 ± 3.5 years. In addition to the chronological age, elbow maturity was assessed using the Sauvegrain score. Surgical outcomes were primarily evaluated using the Kim's score. In addition, we newly defined more successful criteria for the ideal surgical outcomes, equivalent to preinjury status.

RESULTS

There were 19 excellent, 3 good, 4 fair, and 2 poor outcomes based on the Kim's scoring system. Among the 19 patients with excellent outcomes, 14 met our criteria for the ideal outcomes. The age (p < 0.001) and the Sauvegrain score (p < 0.001) were lower, and the interval (p = 0.004) was shorter in 14 patients with ideal outcomes. There were 9 patients with preoperative deformation of the radial head, and all of them showed non-ideal outcomes. In regression analyses, lower Sauvegrain score (p = 0.004) and shorter interval (p = 0.012) were associated with higher postoperative Kim's score, and lower Sauvegrain score (p = 0.031) was related to the achievement of the ideal outcomes. With the Sauvegrain score of >21.5, all patients had postoperative re-dislocation or osteoarthritic changes regardless of the interval. With the Sauvegrain score of <21.5 and an interval of ≤7 months, the ideal outcomes were achieved in 85.7%, and no patients had postoperative re-dislocation or osteoarthritic changes.

CONCLUSION

Over the skeletal ages of 14 years in boys and 11.5 years in girls, reconstructive surgery must be cautiously indicated. Under these skeletal ages with an interval of ≤7 months and undeformed radial head, it appears to be ideal.

STUDY DESIGN

Level III, Retrospective comparative study.

Neglected Monteggia Fractures in Children—A Retrospective Study

(1) Background: A Monteggia fracture is an infrequent injury in children. It can be missed during an initial consultation in 20–50% of patients. Chronic radial head dislocation may lead to several complications. Thus, surgical reconstruction of chronic Monteggia injuries is justified. The aim of this study is to analyze the single tertiary center experience in the treatment of neglected Monteggia fractures. (2) Methods: A retrospective study of patients treated for missed Monteggia fractures was conducted. Hospital records, operative charts, follow-up records and a set of X-rays were analyzed for each patient. Radiographic results were graded as good, moderate or poor. The functional status of elbows was estimated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index. (3) Results: A total of 13 patients (8 boys and 5 girls) aged 4–12 years (mean 7.15) were treated during the study period. An angulation osteotomy of the ulna was performed in ten patients and a radial shortening osteotomy in three patients. A Bell–Tawse annular ligament reconstruction was performed in five patients, and a direct repair was performed in two patients. Eight patients had radiocapitellar trans-fixation. There were nine good radiographic results, three moderate and one poor. The functional result was excellent in nine patients, good in three and poor in one. (4) Conclusions: Our work has many limitations (only 13 patients and different types of operations), and conclusions should be drawn very carefully from such a small and diverse group. The surgical reconstruction of neglected Monteggia fractures in children should be attempted in all patients. Angulation and elongation osteotomies of the ulna are suitable for most patients. If there is a marked overgrowth of the radius, gradual ulnar lengthening and radial head reduction using the Ilizarov method may be a better option. Annular ligament reconstruction is not mandatory.

Influence of ulnar bow sign on surgical treatment of missed Bado type I Monteggia fracture in children

The present study aimed to explore the influence of ulnar bow on the surgical treatment of Bado type I missed Monteggia fracture in children. A retrospective review of 28 patients was conducted between November 2010 and June 2020. All patients were treated with open reduction of the radial head and ulnar opening wedge osteotomy without annular ligament reconstruction. Four months (range 1–12 months) was the mean interval between injury onset and surgery. The average age of patients at the time of surgery was 6.1 years old (range 2–10 years old). The maximum ulnar bow (MUB) and MUB position (P-MUB) via radiography were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups according to P-MUB, as follows: middle group (A) included 17 cases, and the MUB was located at 40–60% of the distal ulna; and distal group (B) included 11 cases, and the MUB was located at 20–40% from the distal end of the ulna. The mean follow-up period was 33 months (range 6–102 months). At the last follow-up, all the children showed stable reduction of the radial head, and the flexion function of elbow joint improved after the operation (P < 0.05). Group A presented a larger ratio of maximum ulnar bow (R-MUB) and angle of ulnar osteotomy (OA) than group B (P < 0.05). The osteotomy angle was positively correlated with the R-MUB (R² = 0.394, P = 0.038). The osteotomy angle was positively correlated with the P-MUB (R² = 0.683, P = 0.000). The R-MUB was proportional to the P-MUB (R² = 0.459, P < 0.0001). The regression equation of P-MUB and osteotomy angle was as follows: OA = 32.64* P-MUB + 7.206. If the ulnar bow was positioned at the middle ulna, then a stable reduction of radial head needed to be achieved through a large angle in the ulnar osteotomy. If the position of maximum ulnar bow (P-MUB) was closer to the middle of the ulna, or the ratio of maximum ulnar bow (R-MUB) was larger, then the osteotomy angle was larger.

Risk factors for redislocation of chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children after reconstruction surgery

INTRODUCTION

Monteggia fracture-dislocation refers to traumatic ulnar fractures and dislocation of the radial head, which is one of the most frequently missed injuries, especially in children. The most widespread attitude towards chronic Monteggia lesion is the open reduction of the radial head associated with ulnar osteotomy with or without annular ligament reconstruction. Our study aimed to analyze the risk factors for redislocation after surgical management of chronic Monteggia lesion and the benefits of annular ligament reconstruction and radiocapitellar pinning in paediatric.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with reconstruction surgery for chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation in our department between 2005 and 2017, with a minimum two years' follow-up. The reconstruction surgery included ulnar osteotomy performed in all patients, annular ligament repair or reconstruction or fixation of radiocapitellar joint, or radial osteotomy in some patients. We collected the related clinical data and evaluated the risk factors of redislocation using logistic regression analyses and a two-piecewise linear regression model with a smoothing function, after reconstruction.

RESULTS

Throughout a mean six years' follow-up (range, 2-14 years), 62 patients (42 males, 20 females; average age 6.49 years range, 2-13 years) were reviewed. Of the radiocapitellar joints, 16.1% was noted to have redislocation. Univariate risk analysis showed age, time from injury to surgery, and radial osteotomy were risk factors for a recurrent radiocapitellar redislocation. Time from injury to surgery was found to be independent predictor of redislocation in multivariate analysis. However, there were significant nonlinear associations between time from injury to surgery and redislocation in multivariate logistic regression analysis after multivariate adjustment (p for nonlinear = 0.023). Every one month increase was associated with a 1.37-fold increase in redislocation, in participants within one year after injury.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the surgery of chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation should be done as quickly as possible within one year after injury. Associated annular ligament reconstruction or fixation of radiocapitellar joint does not seem to be helpful.

Surgical Management of Missed Pediatric Monteggia Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To review surgical management and outcomes of missed pediatric Monteggia fractures.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Library from inception through March 2, 2020. The keywords were "Monteggia fracture," "missed Monteggia," "neglected Monteggia," "chronic Monteggia," and "chronic radial head dislocation."

STUDY SELECTION

All original human studies on missed pediatric Monteggia fractures were included. Congenital Monteggia fractures and isolated radial head dislocations were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

The revised Methodological Index for Nonrandomised Studies tool was used to assess the quality of studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Each patient's data were retrieved individually. The χ2 test and Fisher exact test were used to analyze the difference in outcomes for different surgical managements. Multivariate analysis was performed for variables that were significant on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty studies with 600 patients were included. Proximal ulnar osteotomies (P = 0.016) and the absence of transcapitellar pinning (P = 0.001) were the most significant predictors for eventual reduction of radial head. Other surgical management variables were not significant predictors. These include open or closed reduction approach of radial head reduction; presence or absence of ulnar osteotomy; presence or absence of lengthening, angular correction, overcorrection, or bone grafting of ulnar osteotomy; type of fixation for ulnar osteotomy; presence or absence of radial osteotomy; presence or absence of annular ligament repair or reconstruction; and repair or reconstruction of annular ligament.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Application of annular ligament reposition and repair via Henry's approach for Monteggia fracture in children]

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of annular ligament reposition and repair via Henry's approach for Monteggia fracture in children.

Methods

A clinical data of 21 children with Monteggia fractures was retrospectively analysed, who underwent open reduction of the radial head and annular ligament reposition and repair via Henry's approach between May 2015 and July 2019. There were 11 boys and 10 girls with an average age of 8 years and 1 month (range, 4 years and 5 months to 14 years and 4 months). The fracture was caused by falling in 17 cases and by falling from height in 4 cases. There were 16 fresh fractures and 5 old fractures. The Monteggia fractures were rated as Bado typeⅠin 14 cases and Bado type Ⅲ in 7 cases. Preoperative MRI examination and intraoperative observation confirmed that the annular ligament was intact. After operation, the fracture healing, elbow range of motion (ROM), and complications were recorded, and the effectiveness was evaluated according to the Mackay's function scoring system.

Results

The incisions healed by first intention after operation, and there was no complication such as radial nerve injury. All children were followed up 12-25 months, with an average of 15 months. No dislocation or subluxation of the radial head occurred after operation. At last follow-up, the ROM of elbow flexion and extension of the children with old fractures increased from (92.6±11.2)° before operation to (123.6±11.6)°, and the ROM of forearm rotation from (96.8±11.8)° to (129.8±5.9)°; the differences between pre- and post-operation were significant ( t=7.672, P=0.002; t=9.487, P=0.001); the ROM of elbow flexion and extension of the children with fresh fractures was 139°-156° (mean, 145°); the ROM of forearm rotation was 158°-168° (mean, 162°). According to Mackay's criteria, 17 cases were excellent and 4 cases were good, with an excellent and good rate of 100%. X-ray film examination showed no nonunion, heterotopic ossification, or loosening of internal fixation after operation. The ulnar fracture and the ulnar osteotomy healed in all cases.

Conclusion

The annular ligament in Monteggia fractures in children is intact. Compared with the reconstruction of the annular ligament, the reposition and repair of the annular ligament via Henry's approach is closer to the original anatomical state of the annular ligament and has the advantages of less trauma and fewer complications.

Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients

A neglected Monteggia fracture is defined as the fracture of the proximal ulna associated with radial head dislocation (RHD) without undergoing any treatment for 4 weeks or more after injury. One-stage operation of ulnar corrective osteotomy and open reduction of RHD might result in many complications. Therefore, a two-stage strategy, including ulnar osteotomy (UO) with or without annular ligament reconstruction (ALR), was adopted at our institute since 2010.We performed a retrospective review of 51 patients with neglected Monteggia fracture between January 2010 and January 2018. Patients with bilateral problems or concomitant injuries in the ipsilateral extremity were excluded. Radiological and clinical data were collected from Hospital Database and clinical visits. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the status of the ALR: the UO alone (UO) group and the ALR group.There were 15 patients in the UO group and 36 patients in the ALR group. The age in the UO group (6.1 ± 2.3, year) was significantly younger than the ALR group (9.8 ± 2.8, year) (P < .001). Concerning the duration from initial injury to surgery, there was a significant difference between the UO group (8.6 ± 3.2 months) and the ALR group (23.3 ± 12.6 months, P < .001). Concerning the preoperative elbow function, there was no significant difference between the UO group (67.6 ± 5.0) and the ALR group (66.6 ± 4.4) according to the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) (P = .51). Concerning the postoperative parameters, including postoperative ROM of the joint, removal of external fixator (6.7 ± 0.8, 6.9 ± 0.9 weeks) (P = .55), lengthening (8.9 ± 2.5, 10.3 ± 2.5 mm) (P = .10) and MEPS (92.7 ± 2.1, 91.6 ± 2.1) (P = .08), there was no significant difference between the UO group and ALR group.Two-stage strategy is a reasonable choice for selected patients with long-lasting RHD with ulnar deformity.

Quantitative Analysis for the Change in Lengths of the Radius and Ulna in Missed Bado Type I Monteggia Fracture

BACKGROUND

In missed Monteggia fracture (MMF) cases, ulnar angulation and lengthening by osteotomy are required to reduce the dislocated radial head. This study aimed to clarify the abnormal discrepancy in length between the radius and ulna in MMF. We tested the hypothesis that the increase in the abnormal discrepancy in length between the radius and ulna relates with the duration of radial head dislocation.

METHODS

In total, 24 patients with MMF were studied and classified into 2 groups, according to the duration of radial head dislocation, including the early group (n=9, within 3 y) and the long-standing group (n=15, older than 3 y). The lengths of the radius (Lr) and ulna (Lu) were measured. The difference in length between the ulna and radius (DL=Lu-Lr) was calculated on both the affected (DLaff) and normal (DLnor) sides. DLnor-DLaff, which represented an abnormal discrepancy in both bones, was analyzed for correlation with the duration of radial head dislocation and the age at initial injury.

RESULTS

The affected and normal sides had no differences in the Lr of both the groups and in the Lu of the early group. However, in the long-standing group, Lu was significantly smaller in the affected side than in the normal side (P=0.001). In the long-standing group, DLaff was significantly smaller, owing to decreased length of the ulna, than DLnor (P=0.003). The DLnor-DLaff was positively correlated with the duration of radial head dislocation and was negatively correlated with the age at injury.

CONCLUSIONS

In chronic MMF cases, the length of the ulna was shorter in the affected side than in the normal side. Therefore, ulnar lengthening is necessary to resolve this abnormal discrepancy and reduce the radial head. Because excessive ulnar lengthening has risks of postoperative complications, one of the surgical options is gradual ulnar lengthening or shortening osteotomy of the radius.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Prognosis study.

The management of chronic paediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocation

Background

Monteggia fracture-dislocation is a rare and often missed injury in the paediatric population. The neglected radial head dislocation might go unnoticed for several months, but usually becomes symptomatic at a certain point in time, posing a complex clinical problem. Management strategies for chronic Monteggia lesions have been proposed by many authors. A consensus therapy is nonetheless lacking. In recent years an increasing number of case series reporting the outcomes of various treatment options have been published to gain insight into this challenging pathology. The purpose of this review is to provide a general background on chronic, paediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocation, followed by a systematic analysis and discussion of various management strategies and their outcomes, described in recent outcome studies.

Methods

A literature search was conducted within the online databases PubMed, Cochrane Central, EMBASE and Google Scholar, to identify outcome studies on the management of chronic Monteggia lesions published between January 2015 and April 2020. A total of 23 outcome studies were identified and included in this study.

Results

Obtaining stable radial head reduction can be regarded as the main objective of any management strategy for chronic, paediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocation. In recent literature, many surgical techniques have been put forward to obtain this goal, with the mainstay of most treatment strategies being ulnar osteotomy and open reduction with or without reconstruction of the annular ligament. Watchful neglect is a strategy that got more or less abandoned and is challenged in recent literature.

Conclusions

Due to the complexity of long-standing radial head dislocation and the unpredictability of outcomes in the treatment of chronic Monteggia lesions, early diagnosis and achieving a stable reduction, preferably in the acute setting, are paramount. Because of the tendency to obtain more satisfactory radiological and clinical results in younger patients, with a short injury-to-surgery interval, it is advisable to promptly proceed to surgical treatment when chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation is diagnosed.

Stabilization of the radial head with the palmaris longus or the gracilis tendon: an anatomical feasibility study

PURPOSE

The proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) and the radiocapitellar joint may be destabilized after trauma. Different techniques for stabilization of PRUJ have been proposed, but none of them can stabilize the radiocapitellar joint at the same time. We propose a ligamentoplasty to stabilize the radial head at these two joints by reconstructing the radial head annular ligament and the lateral collateral ulnar ligament (LCUL) with a single graft (palmaris longus or gracilis tendon of the knee).

METHODS

Fifteen cadaveric upper limbs were used to compare the stabilization obtained by performing our ligamentoplasty with the palmaris longus or the gracilis tendon. For each technique, the stabilization obtained was evaluated by measuring the displacement of the radial head in the anterior, lateral and posterior directions when a force of 1 N was applied in maximum supination, neutral rotation and maximum pronation. We also evaluated whether this technique could damage the ulnar nerve or the posterior interosseous nerve by dissecting them and whether it could limit the range of rotation of the forearm.

RESULTS

Our ligamentoplasty enables to restore PRUJ stability equivalent to the intact ligament condition. The palmaris longus was inconstant (13/15) and too short to allow concomitant reconstruction of the LCUL (except in one case). No nerve damage was found during the dissection, and the range of rotation of the forearm was not limited by the ligamentoplasty. We also report a clinical case with an excellent result and without complications.

CONCLUSION

This ligamentoplasty we have described makes it possible to stabilize the radial head with respect to the radial notch of the ulna and with respect to the capitellum of the humerus. The gracilis tendon is more suitable than the palmaris longus because of its constant presence and length. A clinical series is now necessary to better evaluate this technique.

Does overcorrection cause any negative effect on pediatric missed Monteggia lesion?

PURPOSES

To evaluate the outcome of different types of ulna osteotomy in missed Monteggia fracture with a particular interest in anatomical correction and overcorrection techniques. The outcome between the two groups were compared on aspects of (1) clinical outcome (2) radiologic outcome.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with type 1 missed Monteggia fracture who underwent surgery between January 2005-2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the degrees of correction: group 1 anatomical correction (no ulnar dorsal angulation) and group 2 overcorrection (degrees of ulnar dorsal angulation ≥ 10°). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Kim elbow performance score. Radiologic outcomes were categorized into four groups with regard to the radial head: excellent (complete reduction), good (slight subluxation), fair (moderate subluxation), and poor (dislocation).

RESULTS

Eleven patients with anatomical ulna osteotomy and ten patients with overcorrection ulnar osteotomy were enrolled with a mean age of 7.95 (5-12) years at the time of operation. The mean duration from injury to surgery was 27.05 (3-120) months, and the mean period of follow-up was 29.90 ± 22.37 (12-84) months. The average angle of total correction measured in group 1 was 6.09° (3°-9°) and 28.37° (12°-40°), in group 2. Fair-to-poor radiological outcomes at the last follow-up were more frequently observed in overcorrection group (40% vs. 0%) (p = 0.035) as well as clinical outcome (20% vs. 0%) (p = 0.214). Among the patients in group 2, posterior dislocation was diagnosed in two patients at 18 months and 2 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative result of overcorrection ulna osteotomy showed significant inferiority in radiologic outcome compared to anatomical correction. Overcorrection of ulna osteotomy could be associated with posterior dislocation of radial head.

The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing

PURPOSE

The effect of open release of a post-traumatic elbow contracture on the stability of the joint has not been so far studied in vivo. Resection of elbow joint capsule, the key element of surgery, was reported to have no effect on the stability of cadaveric elbows. The joint capsule is yet known to participate in maintaining elbow stability as one of secondary stabilizers.

METHODS

We assessed elbow joint laxity in 39 patients who underwent an open contracture release via the 'column procedure' described by B. Morrey and P. Mansat within the preceeding three to nine months. The measurements were taken with an apparatus designed particularly for this experiment according to the predetermined protocol. A preliminary part of the experiment showed that there was no significant difference between laxity of two elbow joints in healthy volunteers. Laxity of the operated elbows could be then compared with the contralateral joints.

RESULTS

Mean absolute difference of laxity between healthy and operated elbows was 1.55° (0.1°-4.1°, SD = 1.1) being significantly lower than 2°, p = 0.0056. The difference of the joint laxity between the operated and healthy elbows did not differ statistically significantly by more than 0.6° from the difference of the laxity of two healthy elbows and, therefore, is not clinically noticeable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experiment confirmed that the 'column procedure' is a safe procedure which does not compromise the stability of the elbow joint.

Treatment of forearm diaphyseal defect by distraction compression bone transport and continued distraction for radial head reduction: A case study

Treatment of infected forearm nonunion and defects represents a difficult task for the operating surgeons. Conventional methods like composite and vascularized fibular grafts and the induced membranes filled with cancellous autografts or the Masquelet technique have been reported to be useful and successful, but sometimes it is difficult to predict the outcome and cannot address simultaneous deformities or the need to apply gradual distraction for reduction of a chronically dislocated radial head. Ilizarov technique has an answer for such conditions. We report a 43 years old man with infected ulnar defect and dislocated radial head as a result of infected Monteggia fracture: the patient was successfully treated by Ilizarov bone transport after failed attempts by bone spacer and fibular graft.

A new approach for surgical treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture in children

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of a combined anterior and posterior approach for the surgical treatment of chronic Monteggia fractures in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2010 to January 2018, 33 patients (27 boys and 6 girls) with chronic Monteggia fracture who were treated surgically by one surgeon of our department were retrospectively analyzed. In the surgical procedure, open reduction and excision of fibrous scar were performed with the anterior Henry's approach, while ulnar osteotomy was carried out with a posterior approach. In cases of unstable radial head reduction, a trans-capitellar K wire was applied. Repair or reconstruction of the annular ligament (ALR) was not undertaken.

RESULTS

The average follow-up of the patients was 33.8 months (range 8-87 months). At the last follow-up, Mayor Score and function of flexion and extension showed significant improvement compared to preoperative condition (p < 0.05). Two patients with palsy of the deep branch of the radial nerve with neurolysis recovered to normal over a 3-month follow-up. Redislocation occurred in two patients while subluxation occurred in one. One patient suffered a mild ischemic contracture but gradually recovered. Other severe complications, nerve injuries, heterotopic ossification, or synostosis, were not noted in the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A combined anterior and posterior approach for surgery resulted in a satisfactory outcome due to the advantages of better exposure, more convenient intraoperative management, and facilitate for radial nerve exploration. Our study provided a new approach for the surgery of chronic Monteggia fractures.

Complications during the treatment of missed Monteggia fractures with unilateral external fixation: a report on 20 patients in a 10-year period in a tertiary referral center

The treatment of a missed Monteggia (MM) fracture dislocation is still controversial. We describe our initial experience with ulnar osteotomy and progressive correction with unilateral external fixator in MM. We retrospectively evaluated 20 children undergoing ulnar osteotomy and progressive distraction angulation by unilateral external fixator to treat MM. Nine patients had closed reduction, whereas 11 patients had simultaneous open reduction, repair, or reconstruction of the annular ligament and K-wire stabilization of the radiocapitellar joint. Patients were followed for an average of 3 (1-11) years. Three children developed aseptic nonunion and one child had delayed union. A distal level of the osteotomy significantly increased the rate of nonunion or delayed union. At the final follow-up, eight children had complete reduction of the radial head, six children had partial reduction, whereas in six cases, the radial head remained dislocated. The angulation and the level of the osteotomy significantly influenced the relocation, whereas the open reduction had no significant effect on the final position of the radial head. At the final follow-up, the Kim's score averaged 93.25. The flexion-extension arc significantly improved postoperatively, and it was positively correlated with the angulation. The ulnar osteotomy and progressive traction-angulation by unilateral external fixator can achieve satisfactory results in MM, if a meticulous surgical technique is applied; care must be taken regarding the level of osteotomy and the progressive traction-angulation.

Chronic Monteggia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The chronic Monteggia may lead to pain, mobility limitation, progressive valgus deformity, lateral elbow instability, late ulnar nerve paralysis, and degenerative changes. In this review, we discuss the current procedures in the literature focused on correcting chronic Monteggia to avoid these complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Correction of the ulnar deformity with elongation and angulation of the ulna in the opposite direction of the dislocation of the radial head is the most important factor for the reduction and consequent preservation of the radial head. This correction reestablishes the relation of the ulna with the radius and increases the space of the interosseous membrane, providing greater stability after the reduction. The correction may be performed in the acute phase and stabilized with a properly molded plate and screws, or done progressively with an external fixator.

SUMMARY

The chronic Monteggia may occur along with undiagnosed lesions, such as plastic deformation of the ulna with radial head dislocation, or after an unsuccessfully treated acute Monteggia lesion. This condition may go unnoticed, thus requiring attention to the physical examination and imaging tests. Chronic Monteggia may be treated by ulnar osteotomy with progressive correction with an external fixator. However, the most common treatment is transverse proximal ulnar osteotomy, capsulotomy and removal interposed tissue, reduction of the radial head to the capitellum and temporary transcapitellar fixation, ulnar fixation with a straight plate molded to the ulnar deformity, which is usually deviated dorsally, removal of the transcapitellar Kirschner-wire, stability test, and, if necessary, annular ligament reconstruction.

The relationship between the morphological axis and the kinematic axis of the proximal radius

PURPOSE

Surgical procedures for impaired forearm rotation such as for chronic radial head dislocation remain controversial. We hypothesized that the morphological axis of the proximal radius is important for stable forearm rotation, and we aimed to clarify the relationship between the morphological axis and the kinematic axis of the proximal radius using four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT).

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers were enrolled. Four-dimensional CT of the dominant forearm during supination and pronation was obtained. The rotation axis of forearm rotation was calculated from all frames during supination and pronation. The principle axis of inertia, which represents the most stable rotation axis of a rigid body, was calculated for the proximal radius by extending its surface data incrementally by 1% from the proximal end. The angle between the kinematic rotation axis and the morphological rotation axis of each length was calculated.

RESULTS

The rotation axis of the forearm was positioned on the radial head 0.0 mm radial and 0.4 mm posterior to the center of the radial head proximally and 2.0 mm radial and 1.2 mm volar to the fovea of the ulnar head distally. The principle axis at 15.9% of the length of the proximal radius coincided with the forearm rotation axis (kinematic axis). Individual differences were very small (SD 1.4%).

CONCLUSION

Forearm rotation was based on the axis at 16% of the length of the proximal radius. This portion should be aligned in cases of severe morphological deformity of the radial head that cause "rattling motion" of the radial head after reduction procedures.