What is the rate of patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty after core decompression and insertion of a tantalum rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review

Short-term outcomes of AVN CAGE implantation for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head

PURPOSE

Considering the low survival rate for the numerous hip-preserving procedures developed for treating early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), this study aimed to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes following avascular necrosis (AVN) CAGE implantation.

METHODS

58 hips with early-stage ONFH (44 with Association Research Circulation Osseous [ARCO] stage 2 and 14 with stage 3A) treated with the AVN CAGE between August 2018 and December 2021 were included. The survival rates were analysed using radiographic progression and conversion to subsequent total hip arthroplasty (THA) as endpoints.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 22.2 ± 8.2 months. 11 hips progressed to ARCO stage 3B/4, and 6 underwent THA. The estimated 2-year radiographic survival rates were 89.1% and 59.0% for patients with ARCO stages 2 and 3A, respectively. The estimated 2-year radiographic survival rates were 92.9% and 76.3% for Japanese Investigation Committee type B/C1 and C2, respectively. The overall estimated 2-year THA-free survival rate was 88.9%. Advanced disease stage and a large necrotic area were independent risk factors for radiographic progression.

CONCLUSIONS

AVN CAGE combined with standard core decompression was a promising hip-preserving option for patients with no signs of collapse, small necrotic areas, or medially located necrotic locations.

Application of additive manufacturing TaBw01 porous tantalum rod in ARCO stage II osteonecrosis of the femoral head

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the suitable surgical strategies for applying TaBw01 porous tantalum rod across different stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

TaBw01 tantalum rods were fabricated using type FTaY-1 tantalum powder via the foam impregnation-sintering method. Mechanical testing with the Instron 8801 universal testing machine and finite element analysis (FEA) assessed single tantalum rod implantation and impaction bone grafting combined with rod implantation. A total of 86 osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) patients (94 hips) were treated: the experimental group (45 patients, 50 hips) underwent surgical hip dislocation (SHD) with impaction bone grafting and tantalum rod implantation, while the control group (41 patients, 44 hips) received single rod implantation. Primary failure criteria included femoral head collapse (≥ 2 mm) or total hip arthroplasty. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including Harris Hip Score (HHS), Visual Analog Score (VAS), Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living Subscale (HOS-ADL), and Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), were analyzed based on Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID).

RESULTS

FEA confirmed stresses below the material's yield and compressive strength. At 3 years, survival rates for ARCO (Association Research Circulation Osseous) stage IIb and IIc were higher in the experimental group (100%, 80.38%) than the control group, while stage IIa survival was 100% in the control group. The experimental group also had higher MCID attainment for HHS, HOS-ADL, and HOS-SSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with single TaBw01 implantation, impaction bone grafting combined with TaBw01 implantation via SHD demonstrated superior outcomes for ARCO stage IIb and IIc, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. while single TaBw01 implantation may be more suitable for stage IIa. This study emphasizes the importance of combining biological and biomechanical reconstruction in ONFH treatment.

The Effect of the Hip Flexion Angle in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Based on China-Japan Friendship Hospital Classification - A Finite Element Study

OBJECTIVE

The alteration in the mechanical environment of the necrotic area is the primary cause of the collapse observed in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical implications of the China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CJFH) classification system and hip flexion angles on the necrotic area in ONFH using finite element analysis (FEA). The goal is to provide valuable guidance for hip preservation treatments and serve as a reference for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic interventions.

METHODS

Hip tomography CT scan data from a healthy volunteer was used to create a 3D model of the left hip. The model was preprocessed and imported into Solidworks 2018, based on the CJFH classification. Material parameters and boundary conditions were applied to each fractal model in ANSYS 21.0. Von Mises stresses were calculated, and maximum deformation values were obtained to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the load on the necrotic area and post-necrotic femur, as well as assess each fractal model's collapse risk.

RESULTS

(1) At the same hip flexion angle, maximum deformation followed this order: M Type < C Type < L Type. The L3 type necrotic area experienced the most significant deformation at 0, 60, and 110° angles (1.121, 1.7913, and 1.8239 mm respectively). (2) Under the same CJFH classification, maximum deformation values increased with hip flexion angle (0 < 60 < 110°), suggesting a higher risk of collapse at larger angles. (3) Von Mises stress results showed that the maximum stress was not located in the necrotic area but near the inner and outer edge of the femoral neck, indicating decreased stiffness and strength of the subchondral bone after osteonecrosis.

CONCLUSION

The study found that femoral head collapse risk was higher when the necrotic area was located in the lateral column under the same stress load and flexion angle. Mechanical properties of the necrotic area changed, resulting in decreased bone strength and stiffness. Large-angle hip flexion is more likely to cause excessive deformation of the necrotic area; thus, ONFH patients should reduce or avoid large-angle hip flexion during weight-bearing training in rehabilitation activities.

Bone tissue engineering for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a devastating and complicated disease with an unclear etiology. Femoral head-preserving surgeries have been devoted to delaying and hindering the collapse of the femoral head since their introduction in the last century. However, the isolated femoral head-preserving surgeries cannot prevent the natural progression of ONFH, and the combination of autogenous or allogeneic bone grafting often leads to many undesired complications. To tackle this dilemma, bone tissue engineering has been widely developed to compensate for the deficiencies of these surgeries. During the last decades, great progress has been made in ingenious bone tissue engineering for ONFH treatment. Herein, we comprehensively summarize the state-of-the-art progress made in bone tissue engineering for ONFH treatment. The definition, classification, etiology, diagnosis, and current treatments of ONFH are first described. Then, the recent progress in the development of various bone-repairing biomaterials, including bioceramics, natural polymers, synthetic polymers, and metals, for treating ONFH is presented. Thereafter, regenerative therapies for ONFH treatment are also discussed. Finally, we give some personal insights on the current challenges of these therapeutic strategies in the clinic and the future development of bone tissue engineering for ONFH treatment.

Influence of less invasive hip preservation surgery on subsequent hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) following less invasive hip-preserving procedures (LIHPs) and present a critical overview of the literature to aid in better result interpretation. The search time was from the establishment of the database to September 2021, and the outcome indicators were extracted and analyzed by Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager software (RevMan version 5.4). Finally, 10 articles were included in this meta-analysis by searching Chinese databases and English databases. Three of them were published in Chinese, and the remaining studies were published in English. LIHP was further divided into the tantalum rod implantation group and the non-tantalum rod implantation group. The results showed that prior tantalum rod implantation increased the difficulty of conversion to THA, which was reflected mainly in the longer operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 24.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 14.09–34.91, P < 0.00001] and greater intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 114.74, 95% CI = 33.52–195.96, P = 0.006), while no significant difference was found between the non-tantalum rod implantation group and the control group. Simultaneously, easier intraoperative fracture [odds ratio (OR) = 5.88, 95% CI = 0.93–37.05, P = 0.06] and stem malalignment (OR = 4.17, 95% CI = 1.18–14.71, P = 0.03) in the LIHP group tended to be observed than in the control THA group. However, there was no significant difference in cup anteversion and inclination angle, ectopic ossification, postoperative Harris Hip Score and survivorship between the LIHP group and the control group. Although LIHP increased the difficulty of the conversion to THA, it does not detrimentally affect the clinical results of subsequent THA in the mid-term follow-up.

Comparison of the outcome of different bone grafts combined with modified core decompression for the treatment of ARCO II stage femoral head necrosis

PURPOSE

Treatment of ONFH at an early stage is a challenging issue. The modified minimally invasive core decompression combined with bone graft implantation remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the early-middle outcomes of four groups with different bone grafts.

METHODS

A total of 182 patients (192 hips) with ONFH at the ARCO II stage were randomly divided into four groups. The free fibular graft group (FFG), free vascularized fibular graft group (FVFG), autologous iliac bone group (ABG), and β-tricalcium bioceramics phosphate graft (β-TCPG) group. Each group was treated with the modified minimally invasive core decompression and bone graft implantation. The operation time and blood loss were recorded by the same observer. The clinical outcome was evaluated by the Harris Hip Score and VAS score (before, 14 days after surgery, and at the last follow-up). The radiographic progression of ONFH was evaluated at least 36 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

All cases were successful without any complications after the operation. The patients were followed up for 42 to 48 (44.62 ± 1.81) months. There were statistically significant differences among the four groups in operation time (F value = 1520.67; P < 0.01) and blood loss (F value = 5366.81; P < 0.01). The Harris Hip Score in each group was improved significantly from pre-operation to last follow-up (all P < 0.01). At the last follow-up, the difference in the Harris Hip Score in each group was not statistically significant (F value = 0.54; P = 0.984). The VAS scores in each group were decreased significantly from the pre-operation to14 days after surgery (all P < 0.01). At 14 days after surgery, the difference in the VAS score in each group was not statistically significant (F value = 0.64; P = 0.59). At the last follow-up, three hips collapsed on the femoral head in the FFG group, two in the FVFG group, two in the ABG group, and three in the β-TCPG group.

CONCLUSION

The four different bone graft implantation showed satisfactory early-middle outcomes. As compared to other bone grafts, the β-TCP bioceramics graft has the advantages of shorter operation time and lesser blood loss. It may be a choice as a bone graft for the treatment of ONFH at an early stage.

Comparison of cell therapy and other novel adjunctive therapies combined with core decompression for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head : a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 studies

Aims

The value of core decompression (CD) in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether CD combined with other treatments could improve the clinical and radiological outcomes of ONFH patients compared with CD alone.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until June 2020. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) comparing CD alone and CD combined with other measures (CD + cell therapy, CD + bone grafting, CD + porous tantalum rod, etc.) for the treatment of ONFH were considered eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes of interest were Harris Hip Score (HHS), ONFH stage progression, structural failure (collapse) of the femoral head, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The pooled data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software.

Results

A total of 20 studies with 2,123 hips were included (CD alone = 768, CD combined with other treatments = 1,355). The combination of CD with other therapeutic interventions resulted in a higher HHS (mean difference (MD) = 6.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.10 to 10.83, p = 0.004) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (MD = −10.92, 95% CI = -21.41 to -4.03, p = 0.040) and a lower visual analogue scale (VAS) score (MD = −0.99, 95% CI = -1.56 to -0.42, p < 0.001) than CD alone. For the rates of disease stage progression, 91 (20%) progressed in the intervention group compared to 146 (36%) in the control group (odds ratio (OR) = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.64, p = 0.001). In addition, the intervention group had a more significant advantage in delaying femoral head progression to the collapsed stage (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.61, p < 0.001) and reducing the odds of conversion to THA (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.55, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. There were no serious adverse events in either group. Subgroup analysis showed that the addition of cell therapy significantly improved clinical and radiological outcomes compared to CD alone, and this approach appeared to be more effective than other therapies, particularly in precollapse (stage I to II) ONFH patients.

Conclusion

There was marked heterogeneity in the studies. There is a trend towards improved clinical outcomes with the addition of stem cell therapy to CD.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(7):445–458.

[Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with vascularized bone grafting]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current progress of vascularized bone grafting in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), and to provide reference for treatment of ONFH.

METHODS

The literature at home and abroad on the treatment of ONFH with vascularized bone grafting was reviewed, and the mechanism, operating methods and effectiveness, indications, and complications were summarized.

RESULTS

Vascularized bone grafting is a commonly used clinical hip-preserving operation. By replacing necrotic bone tissue with vascularized bone, it can rebuild the blood circulation system, promote the healing of the necrotic area, and provide biomechanical support for the necrotic area of the femoral head, prevent the joint surface collapse. The main operations include the vascularized iliac bone flap grafting, the vascularized greater trochanter bone flap grafting, and the vascularized fibular grafting. The clinical application has achieved certain effectiveness, and the different procedures are suitable for different types of patients. The procedures need to be selected based on the patient's overall condition, the cause of ONFH, the necrosis stage, and the degree of the evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Vascularized bone grafting has a definite effectiveness in the treatment of ONFH in the young and middle-aged. It can significantly improve hip joint function, control the further development of the disease to a great extent, effectively delay or even avoid hip arthroplasty. It is a reliable hip-preserving operation worthy of promotion.

Porous tantalum rod implantation is associated with low survival rates in patients with type C2 osteonecrosis of the femoral head but has no effect on the clinical outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study with an average 8-year follow-up

Background

Our study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and survival rates following porous tantalum rod surgery (PTRS) and conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) subsequent to failed PTRS.

Methods

A total of 38 subjects (40 hips) with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) were included in this retrospective study between January 2008 and December 2011. All subjects were evaluated before surgery by using the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification system, the Japan Investigation Committee (JIC) classification and the Harris hip score (HHS). The endpoint of this study was set as final follow-up (including the survival time of PTRS and conversion THA). The rates of radiological progression were also evaluated. Patients who received conversion THA were further followed and compared to a control group of 58 patients with ONFH who underwent primary THA.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 120.7 ± 9.2 (range, 104–143) months, and the overall survival rate was 75% at 96 months (ARCO stage II: 81.5%; stage III: 38.5%; JIC type C1: 83.3%; C2: 30%). The HHS before surgery was 59 (55–61), in contrast to 94 (91–96) at 96 months follow-up (P < 0.01). HHS in stage III show a significant poorer result compared to stage II at 24 months. HHS in Type C2 group show no significant difference compared to HHS before surgery at 24 and 60 months follow up (P = 0.91, P = 0.30). Twelve hips requiring secondary THA were followed for 66.9 ± 31.7 months, and control hips that underwent primary THA was followed for 75.4 ± 14.9 months. The HHS in the conversion group was 89 (86–93) and that in the primary THA group was 92 (79–95, P = 0.09) at the 5-year follow-up.

Conclusion

In the mid-term follow-up, porous tantalum implants showed an encouraging survival rate in symptomatic patients in early stages (ARCO stage II) or with limited necrotic lesions (JIC type C1). In addition, our results did not demonstrated any difference between primary THA and conversion THA.

Does prior core decompression have detrimental effect on subsequent total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Core decompression (CD) is effective in relieving pain and delaying the progression to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the influence of CD on subsequent THA has not yet been established. Therefore, we performed this systematic review to answer: does prior CD have detrimental effect on subsequent THA for ONFH, especially with regards to survivorship and functional results, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After registration on PROSPERO (CRD42019118861), literature published up to and including November 2018 was searched in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases with predetermined terms. Comparative studies on the clinical outcomes between conversion to THA with prior CD (the Prior CD group) and primary THA (the Control group) for ONFH were included. The outcomes of interest included survivorship free from revision, the postoperative functional performance, perioperative and postoperative complications. Data was extracted systematically and a meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 retrospective cohort studies with 110 hips were identified for the Prior CD group and 237 hips were identified for inclusion in the Control group. All of the studies were of high quality in terms of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. No difference in the rate of revision between the two groups (2/42 (4.8%) vs. 4/160 (2.5%); RR=1.92; 95% CI=0.34 to 10.75; p=0.46) was detected after a minimum two-year follow-up. The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was similar between the two groups in all 5 studies. The two groups experienced similar blood loss (Mean difference=12.17ml; 95% CI= -15.28 to 39.61ml; p=0.38). Moreover, intraoperative fracture was increased in the Prior CD group, though this did not reach statistical significance (3/31 (9.7%) vs. 0/55 (0.0%); RR=7.05; 95% CI=0.82 to 60.78; p=0.08). Similarly, osteolysis or radiolucent lines were more likely to occur in the Prior CD group without statistical significance (9/81 (11.1%) vs. 6/200 (3.0%); RR=3.14, 95% CI=0.98 to 10.06; p=0.05).

DISCUSSION

The present evidence indicated that prior CD does not detrimentally affect the survivorship nor hip scores of subsequent THA. Attention should be paid, however, to the potential for intraoperative fracture, postoperative osteolysis or radiolucent lines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; systematic review and meta-analysis of level III retrospective comparative studies.

Repair of non-traumatic femoral head necrosis by marrow core decompression with bone grafting and porous tantalum rod implantation

Objective

To compare the clinical effects of marrow core decompression with bone grafting and marrow core decompression with porous tantalum rod implantation in treating avascular necrosis of non-traumatic femoral head.

Methods

This prospective study selected 60 patients (74 hips) with avascular necrosis of femoral head admitted to Daping Hospital from January 2018 to March 2019. According to treatment methods, the 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups, i.e. 30 patients in one group were treated by marrow core decompression with bone grafting, and the other 30 patients in the other group were treated with marrow core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation.

Results

All implantation treatments were successful. No significant difference was found in surgical duration, hemorrhage volume and duration of hospitalization stay between the two groups during follow-up. All Harris scores were significantly improved (P<0.05) following treatment compared to those before treatment. The Harris score of patients treated with porous tantalum rod implantation was higher than that of patients treated with bone grafting (P<0.05) after 12 months following treatment and such a difference was significant.

Conclusion

The combination of marrow core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation can better improve the functions of hip joints with early femoral head necrosis than marrow core decompression with bone grafting, and can also prevent articular cartilage from collapsing gradually.

Outcome of tantalum rod insertion in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with minimum follow-up of 1 year: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a debilitating disease that can cause deformity and collapse of the femoral head, thus leading to the development of degenerative joint disease that can incapacitate the patient with pain and reduction in hip mobility. This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of tantalum rod insertion in the treatment of ONFH with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. A multi-database search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data from studies assessing the clinical and radiological outcomes as well as complications of tantalum rod insertion in the treatment of ONFH with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year were extracted and analyzed. Ten studies were included in this meta-analysis, consisting of 550 hips. There was a statistically significant increase in HHS (MD = 30.35, 95% CI: 20.60-40.10, P < 0.001) at final follow-up versus pre-operative scores. The weighted pooled proportion (PP) of radiographic progression of ONFH was 0.221 (95% CI: 0.148-0.316), while that of progression into femoral head collapse was 0.102 (95% CI: 0.062-0.162). Conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) had a PP of 0.158 (95% CI: 0.107-0.227) with a mean weighted period of 32.4 months (95% CI: 24.9-39.9 months). Subgroup analysis of conversion to THA when tantalum rods were used in conjunction with bone grafting (PP = 0.150, 95% CI: 0.092-0.235) showed a marginal risk reduction than when compared with subgroup analysis of tantalum rods being used alone (PP = 0.154, 95% CI: 0.078-0.282). Tantalum rod is a safe alternative option to the current joint-preserving procedures available in the treatment of ONFH. However, more studies are needed to investigate and identify the most appropriate patients who would benefit most and the synergistic effect brought on by the use of complementary biological augmentation of bone grafting or stem cells with tantalum rods.

The Comparative Analysis of Antegrade Versus Retrograde Approach for a Failed Porous Tantalum Rod Removal During Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

The failure of porous tantalum rods applied to patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) has been increasingly reported during the last few years. Very few studies have reported methods for implant removal. This study aimed at comparing 2 procedures used for the removal of a failed tantalum rod during conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Material/Methods

A total of 65 patients (65 hips), who underwent THA after failed implantation of a tantalum rod between June 2007 and December 2016, were retrospectively evaluated. These patients were classified into 2 groups depending on whether the antegrade approach (removal of the tantalum rod from the tip to the butt at the lateral femoral cortex, n=27) or retrograde approach (removal of the tantalum rod from the butt at the lateral femoral cortex to the proximal tip, n=38) was used for rod extraction. These 2 groups were compared for incision length, operation time, blood loss, fracture, tantalum debris, Harris hip scores, and the presence of osteolysis and/or radiolucency.

Results

These 2 groups did not present any significant differences in terms of Harris hip score and incision length. However, the operation time (P=0.000), blood loss (P=0.000), amount of tantalum debris (P=0.000), and presence of radiolucency (P=0.046) were greater for the retrograde approach than for the antegrade approach.

Conclusions

The risk of conversion to THA following failed tantalum rod implantation is high. In such cases, the antegrade procedure was found to be a simple and efficient method for removing the trabecular metal rod with the use of a trephine.