Terrible triad injury of the elbow: a historical perspective

Chronic elbow dislocations: shorterm results of the "French elbow connection" technique

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to describe our experience with French Elbow Connection (FEC) (i.e. elbow reduction and triple ligamentoplasty) for patients with chronic elbow dislocation (CED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 12 patients in two departments of orthopaedic surgery undergoing the FEC procedure for CED between 2019 and 2024. The median follow-up was 1.80 years (IQR 1.00; 1.97). Range of motion, mean Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS), visual analog scale (VAS), elbow stability, and radiographic outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

Median MEPS and VAS were 90.00 points (IQR 75.60; 100.00) and 0 (IQR 0; 1.50), respectively. Eight (66%) patients reported no pain. The median active flexion-extension and prono-supination arcs were 145°(IQR 102.60; 150.00), and 170°(IQR 155.03; 170.00) respectively. Persistent valgus or varus instability was identified in 2 (17%), and 1 (8%) patient respectively. Size patients (50%) were diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) and 1 patient experienced worsening postop OA (from grade 1(preop) to 3(postop)).

CONCLUSION

CED is a complex condition that presents elbow surgeons with unique challenges. The FEC procedure allows for immediate active ROM and yielded satisfactory short-term outcomes in our hands. Larger, longer-term studies will be necessary to assess reproducibility and confirm results can be maintained over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level IV; therapeutic study (case series [no, or historical, control group]).

An Atypical Presentation of Terrible Triad Injury in a Healthy 51-Year-Old Female Patient

A left elbow fracture-dislocation in a 51-year-old female patient following a backward fall at home presented with a comminuted radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, and ruptured collateral ligaments. The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a long-arm splint. Post surgery, aggressive rehabilitation was initiated to restore the range of motion (ROM). Compared to previous reports, this case demonstrates successful management of a severe elbow injury with excellent short-term outcomes. This case highlights the occurrence of the terrible triad in a patient without significant comorbidities and a low-energy fall, as well as the importance of early intervention, proper imaging, and interprofessional collaboration in managing such rare presentations.

Outcomes of coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach in patients with terrible triad injury of the elbow: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE), the indication and the appropriate approach and sequence for coronoid process (CP) fixation remain debatable. No gold standard protocol has been established for CP fixation. In this study, we evaluated the midterm outcomes of coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach in patients with unstable TTIE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study included patients with TTIE who exhibited posterior or posterolateral subluxation/dislocation during examination under anesthesia (EUA) at our institute between January 2019 and December 2021. All patients underwent coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach, regardless of fragment size. After CP fixation, radial head fixation/replacement and lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair were performed through the lateral Kocher approach. Radiographic and functional (Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS] and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [DASH]) assessments were performed 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Complications such as recurrent subluxation/dislocation, synostosis, heterotopic ossification, traumatic arthritis, and stiffness were examined at the follow-up visits.

RESULTS

The analysis included 27 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 29.9 (range 24-44) months. At the 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arcs were 88.7° ± 14.7°, 107.9° ± 11.9°, 128.3° ± 15.5°, and 130.9° ± 15.3°; the mean supination-pronation arcs were 143.7° ± 9.9°, 160.4° ± 7.6°, 165.0° ± 6.0°, and 167.9° ± 4.9°; the mean DASH scores were 18.7 ± 5.7, 4.5 ± 6.1, 2.7 ± 6.5, and 2.0 ± 6.8; and the mean MEPS were 79.1 ± 10.3, 90.2 ± 8.3, 94.8 ± 6.6, and 95.9 ± 5.7, respectively. At the 24-month follow-up, 26 patients had excellent and 1 patient had good results according to MEPS. Only one patient had a complication: they exhibited stiffness and did not have a 30-130° flexion-extension arc at 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The EUA findings, rather than fragment size alone, may be a good indicator of whether the CP needs to be repaired. Midterm follow-up results implied that coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach yields satisfactory functional outcomes with minimal complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level II.

Treatment of the terrible triad of the elbow by olecranon osteotomy: a retrospective cohort study

Background

This study aims to evaluate the surgical techniques and outcomes of treating elbow dislocations with coronoid and radial head fractures, commonly referred to as the terrible triad of the elbow (TTE), through a single olecranon osteotomy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 73 patients diagnosed with TTE between January 2015 and April 2022. The cohort included 44 men and 29 women, with an average age of 40.0 ± 15.1 years (range, 18-68 years). Among these patients, Mason Type I, II, and III fractures were identified in 11, 42, and 20 cases, respectively, while Morrey Type I, II, and III fractures were observed in 45, 23, and five cases, respectively. All patients underwent treatment via a single olecranon osteotomy. The average interval between injury and surgery was 5.6 ± 1.6 days (range, 3-8 days). Elbow function was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), pain was measured via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and quality of life was evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire.

Results

Patients were followed for 15 to 60 months (mean, 37.1 ± 13.3 months). All coronoid and radial head fractures achieved complete healing, with an average recovery time of 4.3 ± 1.1 months (range, 3-6 months). By the final follow-up, all patients had regained normal elbow function. The mean elbow flexion was 124.4° ± 9.2°, extension was 9.6° ± 6.5°, and the total range of flexion-extension was 114.8° ± 11.7°. Forearm pronation averaged 77.3° ± 4.8°, supination 79.2° ± 6.5°, and total forearm rotation 156.5° ± 8.4°. The mean MEPS was 89.3 ± 6.4, with 36 patients achieving excellent scores and 37 obtaining good scores. Preoperative VAS scores averaged 8.78 ± 1.11, which significantly dropped to 0.97 ± 0.83 at the final follow-up (p = 0.000). The SF-36 preoperative PCS and MCS scores were 45.77 ± 3.59 and 60.67 ± 3.91, respectively, with postoperative improvements to 93.85 ± 2.65 (p = 0.000) and 95.79 ± 3.11 (p = 0.000).

Conclusion

This retrospective analysis indicates that a single olecranon osteotomy could be a viable treatment option for TTE. However, additional research involving a control group is essential to substantiate the efficacy of this technique.

Creation of a replicable anatomic model of terrible triad of the elbow

BACKGROUND

Terrible triad of the elbow (TTE) is a complex dislocation associating radial head (RH) and coronoid process (CP) fractures. There is at present no reproducible anatomic model for TTE, and pathophysiology is unclear. The main aim of the present study was to create and validate an anatomic model of TTE. Secondary objectives were to assess breaking forces and relative forearm rotation with respect to the humerus before dislocation.

METHODS

An experimental comparative study was conducted on 5 fresh human specimens aged 87.4 ± 8.6 years, testing 10 upper limbs. After dissection conserving the medial and lateral ligaments, interosseous membrane and joint capsule, elbows were reproducibly positioned in maximal pronation and 15° flexion, for axial compression on a rapid (100 mm/min) or slow (10 mm/min) protocol, applied by randomization between the two elbows of a given cadaver, measuring breaking forces and relative forearm rotation with respect to the humerus before dislocation.

RESULTS

The rapid protocol reproduced 4 posterolateral and 1 divergent anteroposterior TTE, and the slow protocol 5 posterolateral TTE. Mean breaking forces were 3,126 ± 1,066 N for the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), 3,026 ± 1,308 N for the RH and 2,613 ± 1,120 N for the CP. Comparing mean breaking forces for all injured structures in a given elbow on the rapid protocol found a p-value of 0.033. Comparison of difference in breaking forces in the three structures (LCL, RH and CP) between the slow and rapid protocols found a mean difference of -4%. Mean relative forearm rotation with respect to the humerus before dislocation was 1.6 ± 1.2° in external rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

We create and validate an anatomic model of TTE by exerting axial compression on an elbow in 15° flexion and maximal pronation at speeds of 100 and 10 mm/min.

Coronoid fractures and complex elbow instability: current concepts

Fractures of the coronoid process typically occur as part of more complex injury patterns, such as terrible triads, trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, posteromedial rotatory injuries or Monteggia-like lesions. Each pattern is associated with a specific type of coronoid fracture with regard to shape and size and specific soft-tissue lesions. O' Driscoll classification incorporates those associations identifying three major types of fractures: tip, anteromedial facet, and basal fractures. The objective of this study is to review the most common types of complex elbow instability, identify the indications for coronoid fixation and guide the appropriate management. Tip fractures as those seen in terrible triads can conditionally left untreated provided that elbow stability has been restored after radial head fixation and ligaments repair. Anteromedial facet fractures benefit from a buttress plate, while large basilar fractures can be effectively secured with posteroanterior screws. Coronoid reconstruction with a graft should be considered in post-traumatic cases of chronic coronoid deficiency.

Simple acute postero-lateral elbow dislocation: A historical perspective

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to summarize (1) the historical knowledge of the posterolateral elbow dislocation (PLED) pattern and the biomechanical, radiographic, and clinical data that engendered its evolution; and (2) to help clinicians better understand the management of PLED.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Ovid, Scopus and Cochrane Library, and the Medical Subject Headings vocabulary. Results are discussed as a chronologic review of the relevant literature between 1920-2022.

RESULTS

In 1966 Osborn and Cotterill were the first to describe posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) causing the PLED. Several theories on PLED were then published by others surgeons as our understanding of elbow biomechanics continued to improve. Multiple treatment protocols have been designed based on the aforementioned theories. Conservative and surgical treatment for PLED provides excellent functional outcomes. However, high rates of persistent pain stiffness and instability have been reported long-term, and no single approach to treatment has been widely accepted.

CONCLUSION

Despite a growing body of biomechanical evidence, there is no consensus surgical indication for the treatment of PLED. Both conservative and surgical management result in satisfactory functional outcomes after PLED. However, elevated rates of residual pain, and instability have also been described and may limit heavy labor and sports participation. The next challenge for elbow surgeons will be to identify those patients who would benefit from surgical stabilization following PLED.

A combined experimental and finite element analysis of the human elbow under loads of daily living

Elbow trauma is often accompanied by a loss of independence in daily self-care activities, negatively affecting patients' quality of life. Finite element models can help gaining profound knowledge about native human joint mechanics, which is crucial to adequately restore joint functionality after severe injuries. Therefore, a finite element model of the elbow is required that includes both the radio-capitellar and ulno-trochlear joint and is subjected to loads realistic for activities of daily living. Since no such model has been published, we aim to fill this gap. For comparison, 8 intact cadaveric elbows were subjected to loads of up to 1000 N, after they were placed in an extended position. At each load step, the displacement of the proximal humerus relative to the distal base plate was measured with optical tracking markers and the joint pressure was measured with a pressure mapping sensor. Analogously, eight finite element models were created based on subject-specific CT scans of the corresponding elbow specimens. The CT scans were registered to the positions of tantalum beads in the experiment. The optically measured displacements were applied as boundary conditions. We demonstrated that the workflow can predict the experimental contact pressure distribution with a moderate correlation, the experimental peak pressures in the correct joints and the experimental stiffness with moderate to excellent correlation. The predictions of peak pressure magnitude, contact area and load share on the radius require improvement by precise representation of the cartilage geometry and soft tissues in the model, and proper initial contact in the experiment.

Comparison of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who were diagnosed with O'Driscoll type 2 fractures combined with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability and underwent surgery for anteromedial coronoid fracture between August 2014 and March 2019. They were divided into buttress plate (n=16) and cannulated screw (n=11) groups. The elbow range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score (DASH) were used for clinical outcome assessment.

RESULT

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes. However, the surgical time was significantly shorter in cannulated screw group (85.45±4.156) compared to the buttress plate group (93.81±8.863, P=0.008), and the surgical time was associated with internal fixation (P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Although there was selection of cases in that small fragments were treated with buttress plate and large fragments with cannulated screw, the buttress plate and cannulated screw have comparable functional outcomes on fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow PMRI. The fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with large fragments using the cannulated screw has a shorter operation time.