Prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal carcinomas. World J Surg. 2009;33:505-511. [PMID: 19148702 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9875-3]

Preoperative prognostic factors for 5-year survival following pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We seek to identify preoperative prognostic factors and measure their effect on 5-year survival following pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for Colorectal Cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the databases of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase and Google Scholar from January 2000 to April 2021 to identify preoperative factors that have been investigated for their prognostic effect on survival following PM. Quality assessment was performed using the QUIPS tool. The prognostic effect of each identified factor on 5-year survival post-PM was estimated using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 115 eligible articles which included 13 294 patients who underwent PM from CRC. The overall 5-year survival after resection of the lung metastasis was 54.1%. The risk of bias of the included studies was at least moderate in 93% (107/115). Seventy-seven preoperative factors had been investigated for their prognostic effect. Our analysis showed that 11 factors had favourable and statistically significant prognostic effect on 5-year survival post-PM. These included solitary metastasis, size <2 cm, unilateral location, N0 thoracic disease, no history of extra-thoracic or liver metastasis, normal carcinoembryonic antigen levels both before PM and CRC excision, no neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before PM, CRC T-stage < T4 and no p53 mutations on CRC. Disease-free interval at 24 months did not appear to affect 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the considerable risk of bias in the literature, our study consolidates the available evidence on preoperative prognostic factors for PM from CRC. These findings can complement both clinical practice and the design of future research on the field of PM.

Survival and prognostic factors of isolated pulmonary metastases originating from colorectal cancer: An 8-year single-center experience

Background

Isolated pulmonary metastasis (IPM) is a rare entity that accounts for 10% of pulmonary metastases seen in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to evaluate the overall 5-year survival of IPM originating from CRC and identify potential prognostic factors affecting the overall survival (OS).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care center. The study included all patients diagnosed with CRC aged 18–75 years who underwent primary tumor resection with curative intent between 2008 and 2015, and developed IPM. Patients with no follow-up and those with extra-pulmonary metastases were excluded.

Results

The prevalence of IPM in the overall CRC cases was 4.18% (20/478 patients). The mean age of patients with IPM was 52.7 ± 12.9 years. Ten patients had synchronous IPM (50%), thirteen had unilateral (65%), and eleven underwent metastasectomy (55%). The 5-year OS was 40%, and the mean OS was 3.12 ± 1.85 years. Several factors were found to be associated with a favorable outcome, which include unilateral IPM (3.69 vs. 2.07 years; P = 0.024), metachronous (4.25 vs. 2.14 years; P = 0.017), metastasectomy (4.81 vs. 1.83 years; P = 0.005). In addition, mortality was likely to be decreased by more than 90% after metastasectomy (unadjusted odds ratio = 0.071; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.8; P = 0.032).

Conclusions

Forty percent of the included patients survived the 5-year follow-up. Better survival was associated with the metastases being unilateral, metachronous, and metastasectomy. Mortality was lower in patients with pulmonary recurrence after metastasectomy.

•

IPM showed an incidence of 4% among resectable CRC patients.

•

IPM demonstrated 40% 5-year overall survival.

•

Survival was not influenced by age, comorbidities, KRAS mutation, nor the number of pulmonary lesions.

•

Unilateral lesions, metachronous metastases, and metastasectomy were associated with a favorable outcome.

•

The mortality was likely to be decreased by >90% after metastasectomy.

Survival and prognostic factors in patients undergoing extended pulmonary metastasectomy

Extended pulmonary metastasectomy has become feasible in patients with extrapulmonary metastases and multiple or bilateral pulmonary metastases. Even peritoneal dissemination is considered to be curable in modern medicine. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the prognosis of patients undergoing complete pulmonary metastasectomy. A total of 80 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for lung metastases were retrospectively analyzed. The eligibility criteria for the present study were as follows: i) the primary tumor was controlled; ii) if extrapulmonary metastases (including peritoneal dissemination) existed, these were controlled by local treatment or such treatment was planned; iii) the one to three months follow-up computed tomography (CT) following the first assessment revealed no increase of pulmonary metastatic disease; iv) pulmonary metastases could be resected completely. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 71.7 and 41.5%, respectively. Applying the extended criteria for surgery, the present study demonstrated that pulmonary metastasectomy resulted in a good patient prognosis.

Impact of resection margin length and tumor depth on the local recurrence after thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection of a single colorectal metastasis

Background

To evaluate the influence of tumor depth on preoperative computed tomography (CT) image, and resection margin length on local recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection for single pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer origin from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed. Factors such as resection margin, tumor size and depth were analyzed. The local recurrences of two subgroups based on the pulmonary resection margin (Group 1: resection margin 1-10 mm or shorter than the tumor size, Group 2: resection margin >10 mm or at least greater than the tumor size) were analyzed.

Results

Sixty-five patients were included in this study. The local recurrence rate was 12/65 (18.5%). Median follow up period was 33 months. Median tumor size and depth on preoperative CT were 1.1 and 1.6 cm. Median length of resection margin was 0.5 cm (group 1: 0.4 cm, group 2: 1.0 cm, P<0.001). No difference was noted in 3-year local recurrence-free survival (80.8% vs. 76.7%, P=0.756) between the two subgroups. No significant correlation was noted between the length of resection margin and the tumor size and depth. However, tumor depth was an independent factor related to higher local recurrence on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Extent of resection margin in pulmonary metastasectomy does not seem to affect significantly on the local recurrence if complete resection is accomplished. However, preoperative tumor depth on CT image and postoperative distant metastasis seem to affect on local recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy.

The Past, Present and Future of Pulmonary Metastasectomy: A Review Article

Pulmonary metastases are a sign of advanced malignancy and an omen of poor prognosis. Once primary tumors metastasize, they become notoriously difficult to treat and interdisciplinary management often involves a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. Over the last 25 years, the emerging body of evidence has recognized the curative potential of pulmonary metastasectomy. Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases is now commonly considered for patients with controlled primary disease, absence of widely disseminated extrapulmonary disease, completely resectable lung metastases, sufficient cardiopulmonary reserve, and lack of a better alternative systemic therapy. Since the development of these selection criteria, other prognostic factors have been proposed to better predict survival and optimize the selection of surgical candidates. Disease-free interval (DFI), completeness of resection, surgical approach, number and laterality of lung metastases, and lymph node metastases all play a dynamic role in determining patient outcomes. There is a definite need to continue reviewing these prognosticators to identify patients who will benefit most from pulmonary metastasectomy and those who should avoid unnecessary loss of lung parenchyma. This literature review aims to explore and synthesize the last 25 years of evidence on the long-term survival, prognostic factors, and patient selection process for pulmonary metastasectomy.

Expert consensus on multidisciplinary therapy of colorectal cancer with lung metastases (2019 edition)

The lungs are the second most common site of metastasis for colorectal cancer (CRC) after the liver. Rectal cancer is associated with a higher incidence of lung metastases compared to colon cancer. In China, the proportion of rectal cancer cases is around 50%, much higher than that in Western countries (nearly 30%). However, there is no available consensus or guideline focusing on CRC with lung metastases. We conducted an extensive discussion and reached a consensus of management for lung metastases in CRC based on current research reports and the experts' clinical experiences and knowledge. This consensus provided detailed approaches of diagnosis and differential diagnosis and provided general guidelines for multidisciplinary therapy (MDT) of lung metastases. We also focused on recommendations of MDT management of synchronous lung metastases and initial metachronous lung metastases. This consensus might improve clinical practice of CRC with lung metastases in China and will encourage oncologists to conduct more clinical trials to obtain high-level evidences about managing lung metastases.

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer are resected due to the favourable 5-year overall survival rates of 30-60% reported in many studies. However, the efficacy of subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical data of 1237 patients who underwent surgical resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer at 46 Japanese institutions between 2004 and 2008. Patients with non-curative resection, pre-operative chemotherapy, extra-thoracic metastasis, complications after surgery, and inadequate data were excluded. Then, a 1:1 propensity score nearest-neighbour matching between patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy was performed, considering relevant co-variables, and survival of patients between groups was compared.

RESULTS

Data of 524 patients (surgery alone, 269 patients; surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy, 255 patients) were used for matching. From each group, 192 patients with similar background characteristics between groups were selected. Adjuvant chemotherapies included fluoropyrimidine alone (71%), an oxaliplatin-containing regimen (23%), or an irinotecan-containing regimen (6%). In the surgery alone and adjuvant chemotherapy groups, 5-year overall survival rates were 68% and 69%, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 40% and 34%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-1.45, P = 1.00) and disease-free survival (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.82-1.39, P = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of lung-limited metastasis from colorectal cancer did not show a survival benefit in the propensity score-matched analysis and should not be recommended without further clinical trials.

Morbidity, mortality, and survival in elderly patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer is increasing. Nevertheless, they are undertreated compared to younger patients. This study compares postoperative morbidity, mortality, survival, and morbidity risk factors of elderly and younger patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy (PM).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our prospective database of 224 patients operated for colorectal lung metastases between 1999 and 2014. Two groups were defined to evaluate the influence of the patients' age (A: < 70 years; B: ≥ 70 years). Morbidity, mortality, and risk factors for morbidity were analyzed using χ²-test and Fisher's exact test. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and multivariate Cox regression were used to assess survival and prognosticators.

RESULTS

Altogether, minor morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality were 17%, 5.8%, and 0%, respectively. Between groups A (n = 170) and B (n = 54), there was no difference in minor and major morbidity (p = 0.100) or mortality (0%). Heart arrhythmia was a risk factor for increased morbidity in group B (p = 0.007). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 43%, 30%, and 27%, respectively, in group A and 55%, 36 and 19%, respectively, in group B (p = 0.316). Disease-free interval ≥ 36 months (p = 0.023; OR 2.88) and anatomic resections (p = 0.022; OR 3.05) were associated with prolonged survival in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity, mortality, and overall survival after PM with lymphadenectomy for elderly patients were comparable to younger patients. A disease-free interval > 36 months and anatomic lung resections might be associated with prolonged survival. However, elderly patients should also be evaluated for a curative treatment.

Clinical and Radiological Discrimination of Solitary Pulmonary Lesions in Colorectal Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

The lung is one of the most common organs of metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC), and we have encountered lung cancer patients with a history of CRC. There have been few studies regarding methods used to discriminate between primary lung cancer (PLC) and pulmonary metastasis from CRC (PM-CRC) based only on preoperative findings. We retrospectively investigated predictive factors discriminating between these lesions in patients with a history of CRC.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2015, 117 patients with a history of CRC (44 patients with 47 PLC and 73 patients with 102 PM-CRC) underwent subsequent or concurrent resection of pulmonary lesions. We compared the clinical and radiological characteristics of 100 patients with solitary lesions (43 PLC and 57 PM-CRC). Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we examined predictive factors for discrimination of these two lesions.

RESULTS

All tumors with findings of ground-glass opacity (GGO) were PLC (n = 19). In a multivariate analysis of 81 radiologically solid tumors, two factors were found to be significant independent predictors of PLC: a history of stage I CRC and presence of pleural indentation. All tumors in 26 patients with either GGO or both a stage I CRC history and pleural indentation were PLC, while most tumors in patients without all three factors were PM-CRC (43/44; 97.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence or absence of GGO, pathological CRC stage, and pleural indentation could be useful factors to distinguish between PLC and PM-CRC.

The clinical value of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are a potential surrogate for distant metastasis and are considered a useful clinical prognostic marker for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This prospective study evaluated the preoperative CTC count as a prognostic factor for pulmonary metastasectomy in mCRC patients.

Methods

Seventy-nine mCRC patients who underwent curative-intent pulmonary metastasectomy were included. Preoperatively, 7.5 mL of peripheral blood from each patient was quantitatively evaluated for CTCs with the CellSearch^® system. The clinical significance of CTC count was evaluated according to Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank test. Multivariate analyses of the perioperative variables were performed.

Results

The distribution of CTC counts were as follows; 0 in 66 patients (83.5%), 1 in eight patients (10.1%), 2 in three patients (3.8%), and 3 and 6 in one patient (1.3%). The patients with multiple CTCs (CTC count ≥2) had significant shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.005, median DFS; 19.8 vs. 8.6 months) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.035, median DFS; not reached vs. 37.8 months), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed the patients with multiple CTCs had elevated risk of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR), 3.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-8.67; P=0.017].

Conclusions

The detected rate of CTCs was quite low in mCRC patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy. The patient with multiple CTCs had shorter DFS in this study. The larger prospective clinical study is needed to establish the meaning of CTC in mCRC candidate for pulmonary metastasectomy.

Survival after pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer patients: does a history of resected liver metastases worsen the prognosis? A literature review

Objective

: To assess the impact of past liver metastases on the survival duration of patients who are undergoing surgery for lung metastases.

Methods

: We conducted a review of literature published from 2007 to 2014. The studies were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase and were supplemented by a manual search of the references listed by the retrieved studies. The following search terms were used: lung metastasectomy, pulmonary metastasectomy, lung metastases, and lung metastasis. We selected retrospective and prospective studies published from 2007 to 2014 on patients with lung metastases from colorectal cancer and were undergoing surgery with curative intent. We excluded reviews, studies that focused on surgical techniques, patients who were treated non-surgically, analyses of specific subgroups of patients, and those that did not report follow-up of the patients undergoing surgery.

Results

: We identified 28 papers that assessed survival after lung metastases, 21 of which were mostly retrospective studies that identified previous liver metastases to explore their impact on patient survival. In more than half of the papers analyzed (63.2%), patients with a history of resected liver metastases had a lower survival rate than those who did not have such a history, and the difference was statistically significant in eight of these studies. However, data were presented differently, and authors reported mean survival time, survival rates, or hazard ratios.

Conclusions

: A history of liver metastases seems to be a negative prognostic factor, but the individual data need to undergo a meta-analysis.

Loss of SMAD4 Promotes Lung Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer by Accumulation of CCR1+ Tumor-Associated Neutrophils through CCL15-CCR1 Axis

PURPOSE

We have reported loss of SMAD4 promotes expression of CCL15 from colorectal cancer to recruit CCR1⁺ myeloid cells through the CCL15-CCR1 axis, which contributes to invasion and liver metastasis. However, the molecular mechanism of lung metastasis is yet to be elucidated. Our purpose is to determine whether similar mechanism is involved in the lung metastasis of colorectal cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a mouse model, we examined whether SMAD4 could affect the metastatic activity of colorectal cancer cells to the lung through the CCL15-CCR1 axis. We immunohistochemically analyzed expression of SMAD4, CCL15, and CCR1 with 107 clinical specimens of colorectal cancer lung metastases. We also characterized the CCR1⁺ myeloid cells using several cell-type-specific markers.

RESULTS

In a mouse model, CCL15 secreted from SMAD4-deficient colorectal cancer cells recruited CCR1⁺ cells, promoting their metastatic activities to the lung. Immunohistochemical analysis of lung metastases from colorectal cancer patients revealed that CCL15 expression was significantly correlated with loss of SMAD4, and that CCL15-positive metastases recruited approximately 1.9 times more numbers of CCR1⁺ cells than CCL15-negative metastases. Importantly, patients with CCL15-positive metastases showed a significantly shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) than those with CCL15-negative metastases, and multivariate analysis indicated that CCL15 expression was an independent predictor of shorter RFS. Immunofluorescent staining showed that most CCR1⁺ cells around lung metastases were tumor-associated neutrophil, although a minor fraction was granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell.

CONCLUSIONS

CCL15-CCR1 axis may be a therapeutic target to prevent colorectal cancer lung metastasis. CCL15 can be a biomarker indicating poor prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with lung metastases. Clin Cancer Res; 23(3); 833-44. ©2016 AACR.

The prognostic importance of the number of metastases in pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal cancer

Background

The presence of multiple metastatic pulmonary nodules is a predictor of poor survival after pulmonary metastasectomy. However, there is a paucity of data addressing the exact number of pulmonary metastases over which prognosis becomes grave. The aim of our study is to investigate the prognosis of pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer (CRC) depending on the number of pulmonary metastases.

Methods

Patients who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC between November 1994 and December 2013 were included. Survival and recurrence patterns were analyzed with regard to the number of pulmonary metastases. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the number of pulmonary metastases that were detected by the final pathologic report: group I—single metastasis; group II—2–3 metastases; and group III—4+ metastases.

Results

A total of 615 patients who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer were included. The median follow-up period was 31 months (range 2–211 months). The median disease-free interval (DFI) from the time of the primary operation for colorectal cancer was 20 months (range 0–209 months). There were 414 patients in group I (single metastasis), 159 in group II (2–3 metastases), and 42 in group III (4+ metastases). The overall 5-year survival rate was 64.2 %. The 5-year survival rates in groups I, II, and III were 70.0, 56.2, and 33.7 %, respectively (group I vs. II, p < 0.001; group II vs. III, p = 0.012). The 5-year recurrence-free rates were 39.5, 30.6, and 8.5 % in groups I, II, and III, respectively (group I vs. II, p < 0.001; group II vs. III, p = 0.056). Multivariable analysis revealed that age, multiple pulmonary nodules, thoracic lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy are independent predictors of survival.

Conclusions

The overall survival and recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC is dependent on the number of metastases. Surgical treatment can be offered to patients with three or fewer pulmonary metastases. However, more meticulous patient selection is required to decide whether a surgical approach is feasible in patients with four or more pulmonary metastases.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: How many nodules, how many times?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with 5%-15% of CRC patients eventually developing lung metastasis (LM). Despite doubts about the role of locoregional therapy in the management of systemic disease, many surgeons have performed pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for CRC in properly selected patients. However, the use of pulmonary metastasectomy remains controversial due to the lack of randomized controlled studies. This article reviews the results of surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases for CRC, focusing on (1) current treatment guidelines and surgical techniques of PM in patients with LM from CRC; (2) outcomes of PM and its prognostic factors; and (3) controversial issues in PM, focusing on repeated metastasectomy, bilateral multiple metastases, and combined liver and lung metastasectomy.

What to choose as radical local treatment for lung metastases from colo-rectal cancer: surgery or radiofrequency ablation?

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival can be obtained with local treatment of lung metastases from colorectal cancer. However, it is unclear as to what the optimal local therapy is: surgery, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review included 27 studies matching with the a priori selection criteria, the most important being ≥50 patients and a follow-up period of ≥24months. No SBRT studies were eligible. The review was therefore conducted on 4 RFA and 23 surgical series.

RESULTS

Four of the surgical studies were prospective, all others were retrospective. No randomized trial was found. The reporting of data differed between the studies, which led to difficulties in the analyses. Treatment-related mortality rates for RFA and surgery were 0% and 1.4-2.4%, respectively, whereas morbidity rates were reported inconsistently but seemed the lowest for surgery.

CONCLUSION

Due to the lack of phase III trials, no firm conclusions can be drawn, although most evidence supports surgery as the most effective treatment option. High-quality trials comparing currently used treatment modalities such as SBRT, RFA and surgery are needed to inform treatment decisions.

Repeated resection of colorectal cancer pulmonary oligometastases: pooled analysis and prognostic assessment

BACKGROUND

Repeated resection of colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasis is associated with long-term survival. Nevertheless, very limited data addressing the best candidates for repeated pulmonary resection is available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for retrospective studies evaluating lung metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We included studies with available data about repeated pulmonary metastasectomy. Potential prognostic factors were analyzed for possible impact on survival following the second metastasectomy through univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Between 1983 and 2008, 944 lung metastasectomies were carried out on 759 patients. Of those, 148 patients had a second metastasectomy. The 5-year survival rate was 52 % for patients who had 1 metastasectomy and 57.9 % from the second metastasectomy for patients who had repeated resection. More than 2 metastatic pulmonary nodules and maximum diameter of largest pulmonary nodule ≥3 cm were the only independent factors associated with inferior survival following repeated pulmonary resection.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with metastatic CRC, repeated pulmonary metastasectomy offers an excellent chance for long-term survival and is associated with a quite low operative mortality. Patients with more than 2 metastatic nodules and a maximum diameter of the largest metastatic lung nodule of ≥3 cm have a significantly inferior survival.

Risk factors for survival after lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Resection of lung metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly performed with a curative intent. It is currently not possible to identify those CRC patients who may benefit the most from this surgical strategy. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of risk factors for survival after lung metastasectomy for CRC.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of series published between 2000 and 2011, which focused on surgical management of LM from CRC and included more than 40 patients each. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by using random effects model for parameters considered as potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies including a total of 2925 patients were considered in this analysis. Four parameters were associated with poor survival: (1) a short disease-free interval between primary tumor resection and development of LM (HR 1.59, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.27-1.98); (2) multiple LM (HR 2.04, 95 % CI 1.72-2.41); (3) positive hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes (HR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.35-2.02); and (4) elevated prethoracotomy carcinoembryonic antigen (HR 1.91, 95 % CI 1.57-2.32). By comparison, a history of resected liver metastases (HR 1.22, 95 % CI 0.91-1.64) did not achieve statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical variables associated with prolonged survival after surgery for LM in CRC patients include prolonged disease-free interval between primary tumor and metastatic spread, normal prethoracotomy carcinoembryonic antigen, absence of thoracic node involvement, and a single pulmonary lesion.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: long-term survival and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Despite the development of novel chemotherapy and biological agents, surgery is still an important option for patients with pulmonary metastases. Predictors of survival usually include disease-free interval, histology of the primary tumor, number of metastases and complete resection. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma submitted to surgical resection, and to identify prognostic factors that significantly affect overall survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 120 patients with previously treated colorectal carcinoma that had developed pulmonary metastases, admitted between 1990 and 2006. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank and Breslow tests were used to compare survival differences for each variable. Multivariate analyses to determine the independent prognostic factors for overall survival were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model as identified by the univariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 20.3 months (range: 3.27-134.2 months). The patients included in this study underwent a total of 165 thoracotomies (mean of 1.37 thoracotomies/patient). The median overall survival for all patients was 34.73 months, with an estimated 5-year survival rate of 24.39%. Multivariate analyses identified unilateral lesions, neoadjuvant chemotherapy at lung resection and complete resection as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that prognostic factors identified in studies on pulmonary metastasectomy for all primary tumors should be interpreted carefully for patients with possibility of pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal carcinoma.

Curative Radiotherapy using Different Radiation Techniques for Isolated Lung Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer

Aims and background

Surgical resection remains the mainstay for the treatment of colorectal lung metastasis, but a group of patients who are medically inoperable or unsuitable for surgery are treated with radiotherapy. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and investigate the prognostic factors affecting local control and survival in this subset of patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with 43 lesions who underwent curative radiotherapy for isolated lung metastasis from colorectal cancer at nine institutions from 2003 and 2008. A total dose of 42–75 Gy at the peripheral planning target volume was administered in 3–35 fractions. The median biologically equivalent dose was 84 Gy (range, 58.5–180).

Results

Treatment response was complete in 10 (33.3%), partial in 13 (43.3%), stable in six (20.0%), and progressive in one patient (3.3%). The median follow-up period for all patients was 29.0 months (range, 5.0–93.8). Kaplan-Meier local control at 5 years was 44%. The median survival was 46.2 months, and the 5-year overall survival was 47%. Twenty-three patients (77%) experienced treatment failure, most of which were intrapulmonary failure. The intrapulmonary relapse-free survival and overall relapse-free survival at 5 years were 22% and 19%, respectively. Treatment response and pre-radiotherapy carcinoembryonic antigen level were significant prognostic factors for local control and survival. Grade 3–5 toxicity occurred in 7 patients. Three patients had grade 5 toxicity, including radiation pneumonitis, a tracheoesophageal fistula, and hemoptysis.

Conclusions

Curative radiotherapy for isolated lung metastasis from colorectal cancer in patients who are medially inoperable or unsuitable for surgery results in long-term survival, comparable to surgical resection. Curative radiotherapy could be an effective and noninvasive alternative if dose-limiting toxicity is carefully considered, particularly in patients with bilateral or central lesions.

Expression of MMP-9 and WAVE3 in colorectal cancer and its relationship to clinicopathological features

PURPOSE

To investigate matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and WAVE3 expression in human colorectal cancer (CRC) and to evaluate their clinical significance.

METHODS

We first performed real-time PCR to evaluate mRNA expression of MMP-9 and WAVE3 in 21 pairs of fresh CRC samples matched with adjacent normal mucosa. Then, MMP-9 and WAVE3 proteins were evaluated by immunohistochemistry on CRC tissue microarrays which included 216 CRC specimens and corresponding normal colorectal mucosa, and their correlation with clinicopathological factors and overall survival after surgery was evaluated.

RESULTS

Both real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry evaluation have demonstrated that MMP-9 and WAVE3 were over-expressed in colorectal cancer tissues compared with normal mucosa (p < 0.001). MMP-9 expression was significantly higher in patients with low-grade differentiation and distant metastasis (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively), and patients with MMP-9-positive expression had a poorer prognosis (p = 0.008). However, patients with WAVE3-positive expression had a better prognosis (p = 0.039) and particularly favorable prognostic factors, including non-lymph node metastasis, non-distant metastasis, and early TNM stage (p = 0.029, 0.021, and 0.003, respectively). In addition, MMP-9-negative/WAVE3-positive patients had the best overall survival (p = 0.021). In multivariate survival analysis, MMP-9 expression and combined expression status of MMP-9/WAVE3 were identified as independent prognostic factors for CRC (p = 0.046 and p = 0.019, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined analysis of MMP-9 and WAVE3 has a significant value for assessing prognosis of CRC patients after surgery.

Survival outcome in New Zealand after resection of colorectal cancer lung metastases

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the second most common type of solid organ cancer in New Zealand behind prostate cancer. Even with treatment, distant disease may develop in the liver and lungs. Surgical resection of isolated liver and/or lung metastasis is now commonly considered, but survival outcomes from the latter are not well described. This study aims to review the 5-year survival and prognostic factors of patients who have resection for lung metastasis of colorectal origin.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of surgical resection for lung metastasis performed by thoracic departments of several tertiary referral centres within New Zealand was performed. The study period was between 1997 and 2011. Patients were identified through operative logs, audit databases, clinical case mix codes and pathology databases. Patient demographics, preoperative and post-operative variables were recorded. All patients were followed up for survival analysis. Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests were performed for data analysis. A P-value of less than 0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

There were 106 (59 male) patients. Median age was 64 (inter-quartile range (IQR) 57-73) years. Median follow-up period was 30 (IQR 16-46) months. The 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival was 40% and 43%, respectively. The only good prognostic factor for survival after lung resection was a long disease-free interval (P = 0.04) between surgery for the colorectal primary and lung metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Lung resection for isolated colorectal metastases provides a reasonable 5-year survival. Outcomes from lung resection for colorectal metastases in New Zealand are comparable to that from international series.

Prognostic factors in patients undergoing complete resection of pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional cumulative follow-up study

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to establish the prognostic factors for overall survival after pulmonary resection for lung metastases of colorectal carcinoma (CRC).

METHODS

The baseline characteristics and outcomes of 266 CRC patients undergoing complete pulmonary resection were collected from 19 institutions by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Study Group. We used the Cox proportional hazard regression to identify independent prognostic factors for OS.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate of patients undergoing complete resection of isolated pulmonary metastases was 56.5 %. The independent unfavorable prognostic factors after pulmonary resection included stage T4 (p = 0.0004) and N2 (p = 0.0082) as primary cancer-related factors, and more than three metastases (p = 0.0342), bilateral distribution (p = 0.0450), metastatic disease-free interval (DFI) of less than 2 years (p = 0.0257), and a preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level greater than 5.0 ng/mL (p = 0.0209) as pulmonary metastases-related factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis suggested that the indications for pulmonary resection of CRC metastases should be decided not only by the status of lung metastases, but also by pulmonary-related factors such as the T and N stage of the primary lesion, preoperative CEA level, and the DFI.

Predictors of recurrent pulmonary metastases and survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Resection of pulmonary colorectal carcinoma metastases may provide long-term benefit, but patient selection remains controversial. The objective of this study was to identify preoperative predictors of survival and lung recurrence for patients undergoing resection of such lesions.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent their first colorectal carcinoma pulmonary metastasectomy. Two multivariate logistic analyses were performed to identify preoperative predictors of survival and lung recurrence. Preoperative factors, pathologic colorectal carcinoma stage, additional sites of metastases, timing of metastatic occurrence, and premetastasectomy disease-free interval were included in the univariate analyses.

RESULTS

From January 2000 to December 2010, 229 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 60 years, and 100 patients (43.7%) were women. The overall median time and 5-year survival rate were 70.1 months and 55.4%, respectively, after the first pulmonary metastasectomy. Median follow-up was 37.2 months. Age older than 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.005 to 1.052; p=0.016), male sex (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.089 to 3.094; p=0.023), and more than three lung metastases (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.024 to 1.282; p=0.018) predicted survival at 5 years in one multivariate analysis. In the second, more than three lung metastases present at first metastasectomy (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.071 to 1.321; p=0.001) and the preoperative disease-free interval of less than 3 years (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.973 to 0.997; p=0.013) predicted lung recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, male sex, and more lung metastases predict poorer survival after resection of pulmonary colorectal cancer metastases. The number of lung metastases present at the first metastasectomy and the preoperative disease-free interval predicted recurrence in the lung.

Colorectal cancer and thoracic surgeons: close encounters of the third kind

Resection of lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly performed with a curative intent. This strategy was made possible in the 1990s by the development of new chemotherapeutic approaches, improved surgical techniques and better imaging modalities. However, evidence-based data showing clinical benefits of lung metastasectomy in this setting are nonexistent, and there are no prospective randomized trials to support the routine performance of these procedures for stage IV CRC. Current evidence suggests that resection of pulmonary metastases in combination with new cytotoxic agents, such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan and bevacizumab, may result in prolonged survival for many, and cure for a small minority of CRC patients who experienced tumor spread beyond the limits of the abdomen. This review focuses on the results of surgical management of CRC patients with lung metastases: we report the outcome of published series according to the presence or the absence of liver metastasis (and hepatic resection) prior to lung resection.

Optimal management of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

The incidence of colorectal cancers is rising worldwide and pulmonary metastases were seen in approximately 10-15% of all patients. Surgical metastasectomy is a widely accepted procedure in selected patients and is considered as the only curative option in patients with secondary pulmonary malignancy. But surgical resection remains controversial due to the lack of randomized trials, comparing pulmonary metastasectomy to control, either medical therapy, or observation. This article will discuss the differentiated therapeutic strategies for patients with pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer, focusing on surgical resection, patient evaluation, prognostic factors, interdisciplinary therapeutic approaches and current trials.

[Prognostic factors of colorectal cancer lung metastases]

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is the third most common neoplasia and the second cause of death due to cancer in developed countries. Approximately 10% of patients with this diagnosis develop lung metastases, although only 2-4% of them have lung metastases as the only extension location.

OBJECTIVE

To study the prognostic factors of colorectal cancer lung metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on 30 patients with colorectal cancer lung metastases who were operated on in our hospital between January 2003 and December 2007.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients who received surgery, 19 were males (63%) and 11 were female (37%), with a mean age of 63.37 years (range 35-82 years). The mean overall survival was 36.64 months (range 18.58-54.70 months). A total of 13 pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters were used in the statistical analysis. In the univariate analysis, the number of metastases greater than 3 (P=.051), whether they were bilateral (P=.001), or bilobar (P<.001), were statistically significant factors of a poor prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, only being bilobar was shown to be a statistically significant factor of a poor prognosis (P=.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In our patient series affected by colorectal carcinoma lung metastases, the number of metastases greater than three, whether they are bilobar and bilateral, are factors of a poor prognosis. These factors should be taken into account in the follow-up of these patients, although prospective studies with a larger number of patients are required to confirm these findings.

Survival after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: importance of previous liver metastasis as a prognostic factor

AIMS

To analyse patient survival after the resection of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma and specifically to verify whether presence of liver metastasis prior to lung metastasectomy affects survival.

METHODS

All patients who, between 1998 and 2008, underwent lung metastasectomy due to colorectal cancer were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with the log-rank test and Cox regression multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

During this period, 101 metastasectomies were performed on 84 patients. The median age of patients was 65.4 years, and 60% of patients were male. The 30-day mortality rate was 2%, and incidence of complications was 7%. The overall survival was 72 months, with 3-and 5-year survival rates of 70% and 54%, respectively. A total of 17 patients (20%) had previously undergone resection of liver metastasis. No significant differences were found in the distribution of what were supposed to be the main variables between patients with and without previous hepatic metastases. Multivariate analysis identified the following statistically significant factors affecting survival: previous liver metastasectomy (p = 0.03), tumour-infiltrated pulmonary lymph nodes (p = 0.04), disease-free interval ≥ 48 months (p = 0.03), and presence of more than one lung metastasis (p < 0.01). In patients with previous liver metastasis, the shorter the time between primary colorectal surgery and the hepatectomy, the lower the survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

A previous history of liver metastasis shortens survival after lung metastasectomy. The time between hepatic resection and lung metastasectomy does not affect survival; however, patients with synchronous liver metastasis and colorectal neoplasia have poorer survival rates than those with metachronous disease.

Repeat resection of pulmonary metastasis is beneficial for patients with colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role for repeat pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal carcinoma has not been well defined. To identify the class of patients who benefit from pulmonary resection of recurrent pulmonary metastases, we herein reviewed our institutional experience.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2007, 84 patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinomas underwent complete pulmonary resection, and 22 of them (26%) later underwent complete resection for repeat pulmonary metastasis. Various perioperative variables were investigated retrospectively in these patients to confirm a role for repeat metastasectomy and analyze prognostic factors after repeat pulmonary metastasectomy.

RESULTS

Overall survival and disease-free survival after repeat pulmonary metastasectomy were, respectively, 61 and 32% at 5 years. On univariate analysis, male gender and less than 1 year of disease-free status after the first pulmonary metastasectomy demonstrated significantly adverse overall survival (p = 0.01 and p = 0.009, respectively). Elevated preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and maximum tumor size larger than 3 cm were also significantly adverse prognostic factors for disease-free survival (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). The overall survival curve after repeat pulmonary metastasectomy was almost identical with that after complete resection of the first pulmonary metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with more than 1 year of disease-free status after the first pulmonary metastasectomy demonstrated a significantly better overall survival. Normal preoperative serum CEA level and maximum tumor size <3 cm were significantly adverse prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Our data imply that repeat pulmonary metastasectomy might be beneficial as it can salvage a subset of patients with colorectal carcinoma who retain favorable prognostic determinants.

Reported outcome factors for pulmonary resection in metastatic colorectal cancer

Pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal cancer is widely practiced in surgical oncology. However, only a highly selected subset of patients is eligible for resection, and the average recurrence rate is still high. We reviewed the recent literature on pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer and tried to address the issue of patient selection based on prognostic parameters associated with long-term survival. No randomized phase III trials are available, and data for this review were retrieved only from retrospective studies. We excluded papers reporting on patients earlier than 1990. In summary, there is a substantial body of evidence demonstrating that resection of pulmonary metastases can be performed safely and with a low mortality rate. For a subset of highly selected patients, the overall results of a 5-year actuarial survival rate after complete resection ranged between 40 and 68%. These outcomes exceed those normally associated with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is this perception that has encouraged surgeons and caused the practice to grow.

Predicting survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: previous liver metastases matter

BACKGROUND

Few patients with lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) are candidates for surgical therapy with a curative intent, and it is currently impossible to identify those who may benefit the most from thoracotomy. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of various parameters on survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 40 consecutive patients (median age 63.5 [range 33-82] years) who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from CRC in our institution from 1996 to 2009.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 33 (range 4-139) months. Twenty-four (60%) patients did not have previous liver metastases before undergoing lung surgery. Median disease-free interval between primary colorectal tumor and development of lung metastases was 32.5 months. 3- and 5-year overall survival after thoracotomy was 70.1% and 43.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the following parameters were correlated with tumor recurrence after thoracotomy; a history of previous liver metastases (HR = 3.8, 95%CI 1.4-9.8); and lung surgery other than wedge resection (HR = 3.0, 95%CI 1.1-7.8). Prior resection of liver metastases was also correlated with an increased risk of death (HR = 5.1, 95% CI 1.1-24.8, p = 0.04). Median survival after thoracotomy was 87 (range 34-139) months in the group of patients without liver metastases versus 40 (range 28-51) months in patients who had undergone prior hepatectomy (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

The main parameter associated with poor outcome after lung resection of CRC metastases is a history of liver metastases.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis

OBJECTIVES

Surgical removal of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer is undertaken increasingly but the practice is variable. There have been no randomized trials of effectiveness. We needed evidence from a systematic review to plan a randomized controlled trial.

DESIGN

A formal search for all studies concerning the practice of pulmonary metastasectomy was undertaken including all published articles using pre-specified keywords. Abstracts were screened, reviewed and data extracted by at least two of the authors. Information across studies was collated in a quantitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Of 101 articles identified, 51 contained sufficient quantitative information to be included in the synthesis. The reports were published between 1971 and 2007, and reported on 3504 patients. There was little change over time in patient characteristics such as age, sex, the time elapsed since resection of the primary cancer, its site or stage. The proportion with multiple metastases or elevated carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) did not change over time but there was an apparent increase in the proportion of patients who also had hepatic metastasectomy. Differences in 5-year survival between groups defined by CEA or by single versus multiple metastases persisted over time. Few data were available concerning postoperative morbidity, postoperative lung function or change in symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The quality of evidence available concerning pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer is not sufficient to draw inferences concerning the effectiveness of this surgery. There is great variety in what was reported and its utility. Given the burdensome nature of the surgery involved, better evidence, ideally in the form of a randomized trial, is required for the continuance of this practice.