Enhanced Significance of Donor–Recipient Age Gradient as a Prognostic Factor of Graft Outcome in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Successful salvage of renal allograft rupture: A case report

Allograft rupture is a rare complication of renal transplantation. We present a case of renal allograft rupture which did not lead to nephrectomy. A young woman underwent renal transplantation. On day 5 of transplantation, the patient complained of sudden pain over the transplant site and severe hemorrhage. the immediate exploration, shows allograft rupture. The rupture of allograft was repaired. The patient recovered without any complications our study revealed that, repair and salvage of renal allograft were successful and nephrectomy is not mandatory in renal allograft rupture.

Five decades with grandparent donors: The Norwegian strategy and experience

Living donors (LDs) are preferred over DDs for renal transplantation in children due to superior GS. Oslo University Hospital has never restricted living donation by upper age. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term outcomes using grandparents (GPLD) compared to PLD. Retrospective nationwide review in the period 1970-2017. First renal graft recipients using a GPLD were compared to PLD kidney recipients for long-term renal function and GS. 278 children (≤18 years) received a first renal transplant: 27/251 recipients with a GPLD/PLD. GPLD (median 59 (42-74) years) were significantly older than PLD (median 41 (23-65) years, (P < .001). Median DRAD was 52 (38-70) vs 28 (17-48) years, respectively. GS from GPLD and PLD had a 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival of 100%, 100%, and 90% vs 93%, 82%, and 72%, respectively (P = .6). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for gender, donor age, recipient age, and year of transplant, this finding was similar (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.34-2.84, P = .97). Five-year eGFR was 47.3 and 59.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the GPLD and PLD groups (P = .028), respectively. In this nationwide retrospective analysis, GS for pediatric renal recipients using GPLD was comparable to PLD. Renal function assessed as eGFR was lower in the GPLD group. The GPLD group was significantly older than the PLD group, but overall this did not impact transplant outcome. Based on these findings, older age alone should not exclude grandparent donations.

Immunologic Long-term Outcomes of Living-Related Kidney Transplantations Depending on the Donor-Recipient Relationship

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term immunologic outcomes of living-related kidney transplantations depending on the donor-recipient relationship.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR) transplanted between 2000 and 2014. Among 1117 KTRs, 178 patients (15.9%) received living-related donations. Those patients were further categorized according to the donor-recipient relationship: 65 transplantations between siblings, 39 father-to-child (F-t-C) and 74 mother-to-child (M-t-C) donations. Allograft biopsies were performed for clinically suspected rejections. Data analysis included patient and graft survival, biopsy proven rejections (T-cell mediated [TCMR] or antibody mediated) and development of de novo donor-specific antibody. Outcome data were assessed over a period of a maximum 14 years.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups (F-t-C, M-t-C, and siblings) with regard to HLA-mismatches, prior kidney transplantations, time on dialysis, and cold ischemia time. Among KTRs with related donors, the type of relationship had no significant influence on graft survival. F-t-C and M-t-C pairs showed comparable incidences of TCMR at 7 years post-transplantation, both significantly exceeding the rate in sibling-to-sibling pairs (26.2% and 26.8% vs 10%, respectively; P = .043). A multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for recipient age, donor age, and HLA (A, B, DR)-mismatches identified both M-t-C- and F-t-C-donations as important independent risk factors for TCMR (hazard ratio: 8.13; P < .001 and hazard ratio: 8.09; P = .001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups concerning the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that parent-to-child kidney donation is an independent risk factor for TCMR.

Acceptability of older adults as living kidney donors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Kidney transplantation from a living kidney donor (LKD) is associated with better long-term survival and quality of life for a patient with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than dialysis. We reviewed recent literature on the acceptability and outcomes of older adults as LKDs, which may be misunderstood in routine care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies report that receiving a kidney from an older LKD is associated with worse recipient and graft survival compared with receiving a kidney from a younger LKD, but similar recipient and graft survival to receiving a kidney from a standard criteria deceased donor. A kidney from a younger vs. older LKD results in better graft survival in younger recipients, whereas the graft survival is similar in older recipients. Compared with healthy matched nondonors, older LKDs have a similar risk of death and cardiovascular disease and the absolute risk of ESRD after 15 years remains less than 1%. The estimated predonation and postdonation lifetime risk of ESRD varies by age, sex and race with lower incidences in individuals who are older, female and white (vs. African-American).

SUMMARY

Donor and recipient outcomes from several studies support the acceptability of older adults as LKDs.

The effect of delayed graft function on graft and patient survival in kidney transplantation: an approach using competing events analysis

OBJECTIVE

In kidney transplantation, the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on long-term graft and patient survival is controversial. We examined the impact of DGF on graft and recipient survival by accounting for the possibility that death with graft function may act as a competing risk for allograft failure.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We used data from 1281 adult primary deceased-donor kidney recipients whose allografts functioned at least 1 year.

RESULTS

The probability of graft loss occurrence is overestimated using the complement of Kaplan-Meier estimates (1-KM). Both the cause-specific Cox proportional hazard regression model (standard Cox) and the subdistribution hazard regression model proposed by Fine and Gray showed that DGF was associated with shorter time to graft failure (csHR = 2.0, P = 0.002; sHR = 1.57, P = 0.009), independent of acute rejection (AR) and after adjusting for traditional factors associated with graft failure. Regarding patient survival, DGF was a predictor of patient death using the cause-specific Cox model (csHR = 1.57, P = 0.029) but not using the subdistribution model.

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of graft loss from competing end points should not be reported with the 1-KM. Application of a regression model for subdistribution hazard showed that, independent of AR, DGF has a detrimental effect on long-term graft survival, but not on patient survival.

Rupture of renal transplant

Background. Rupture of renal allograft is a rare and serious complication of transplantation that is usually attributed to acute rejection, acute tubular necrosis, or renal vein thrombosis. Case Presentation. LD, a 26-year-old male with established renal failure, underwent deceased donor transplantation using kidney from a 50-year-old donor with acute kidney injury (Cr 430 mmol/L). LD had a stormy posttransplant recovery and required exploration immediately for significant bleeding. On day three after transplant, he developed pain/graft swelling and another significant haemorrhage with cardiovascular compromise which did not respond to aggressive resuscitation. At reexploration, the renal allograft was found to have a longitudinal rupture and was removed. Histology showed features of type IIa Banff 97 acute vascular rejection, moderate arteriosclerosis, and acute tubular necrosis. Conclusion. Possible ways of avoiding allograft rupture include use of well-matched, good quality kidneys; reducing or managing risk factors that would predispose to delayed graft function; ensuring a technically satisfactory transplant procedure with short cold and warm ischemia times; and avoiding large donor-recipient age gradients.