York Mason procedure to repair iatrogenic rectourinary fistula: our experience

Outcomes of gracilis muscle interposition for rectourethral fistulas caused by treatment of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Gracilis muscle interposition (GMI) has been associated with favorable outcomes in treating complex perianal fistulas. Outcomes of GMI may vary according to the fistula etiology, particularly between rectovaginal fistulas in women and rectourethral fistulas (RUF) in men. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of GMI to treat RUF acquired after prostate cancer treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included male patients treated with GMI for RUF acquired after prostate cancer treatment between January 2000 and December 2018 in the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida. The primary outcome was the success of GMI, defined as complete healing of RUF without recurrence. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

This study included 53 male patients with a median age of 68 (range, 46-85) years. Patients developed RUF after treatment of prostate cancer with radiation (52.8%), surgery (34%), or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (13.2%). Median hospital stay was 5 (IQR, 4-7) days. Twenty (37.7%) patients experienced 25 complications, the most common being wound infection and dehiscence. Primary healing after GMI was achieved in 28 (52.8%) patients. Fifteen additional patients experienced successful healing of RUF after additional procedures, for a total success rate of 81.1%. Median time to complete healing was 8 (range, 4-56) weeks. The only significant factor associated with outcome of GMI was wound dehiscence (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the initial success rate of GMI was approximately 53%, it increased to 81% after additional procedures. Complications after GMI were mostly minor, with wound complications being the most common. Perianal wound dehiscence was significantly associated with failure of healing of RUF after GMI.

Modified York Mason Procedure for the Closure of a Complex Anterior Fistula in Ano

The York Mason procedure was initially described for the management of recto-urinary fistulae. Although this procedure may be difficult to perform, success rates and long-term outcomes are encouraging. Adopting this technique for the management of a complex non-recto-urinary fistula in ano may be reasonable. In this manuscript, the York Mason technique was modified to repair a complex type 4 anterior fistula in ano without involvement of the urinary system with good results.

[Rectourethral fistula treatment using the modified York Mason technique: Failure factors assessment]

OBJECTIVES

To assess surgical outcomes and failure factors in the management of rectourethral fistulas treated surgically with the modified York Mason technique based on our center's 25 years of experience.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2021, in a single center study, a total of 35 consecutive patients, underwent rectourethral fistula cure, using the modified York Mason technique. Preoperative patient data, surgical outcomes and failure factors were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients, 28 were successfully managed without the need of further intervention (80%). Median age was 67 years (IQR 62-72) and median follow-up time was 71 months (IQR 30-123). There was no significant difference between the patients that had recurrence or not after the first York Mason.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified York Mason technique offers a high success rate for the cure of iatrogenic rectourethral fistulas. No predictive factor of failure, after a first cure of recto-uretral fistula by modified York-Mason technique was reported.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues

PURPOSE

To evaluate efficacy of urorectal fistula (URF) repair using different approaches and the clinical factor determinant of success, and also the morbidity associated to the procedure and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in male survivors of pelvic malignancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of 39 patients with URF primarily intervened in three institutions using different surgical approaches. Success was defined as effective fistula closure. Variables evaluated included demographics, previous treatments, surgical approach, ancillary surgeries, complications and HRQoL by using a standardized non-validated specific questionnaire. Median follow-up from surgery to interview was 55 months (interquartile range 49, range 4-112). Factors determinant of success were investigated using logistic regression. Safety of the procedure was evaluated by Clavien-Dindo scale. Deterioration of continence and erectile function and other HRQoL issues were evaluated.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer treatment was the predominant etiology. The success rate for fistula repair was 89.5%. The surgical approach was not related to failed repair (p=0.35) or complications (p=0.29). Factors associated with failure were complications (p=0.025), radiotherapy (p=0.03), fistula location (p=0.04) and fistula size (p=0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed fistula size was the only independent determinant of failure (OR 6.904, 1.01-47.75). Complications occurred in 46.2% and severe complications in 12.8%. The mortality related to the procedure was 2.6%. Urinary incontinence was present before repair in 26.3% and erectile dysfunction in 89.5%. Fistula repair caused de novo urinary incontinence in 7.9% and deterioration of erectile status in 44.7%. Globally 79% were satisfied after repair and only 7.9% rated HRQoL as unhappy. Trans-sphincteric approach was related to less deterioration of erectile function (p=0.003), and higher perceived satisfaction in QoL (p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical approach elected to correct URF is not determinant of success nor of complications. Fistula size appears as independent determinant for failure. Trans-sphincteric approach could be advantageous over other procedures regarding HRQoL issues.

Endoscopic Closure of a Large Rectovesical Fistula Following Robotic Prostatectomy

Background: Rectovesical fistulae (RVF) are uncommon complications of pelvic surgeries and are a potential cause of significant morbidity. RVF are not typically closed endoscopically but rather require reoperative surgery of the lower pelvis with closure of tract, interposition of fat or omentum, and possible permanent bowel diversion. We present a unique case of a rectovesical fistula developing after robotic prostatectomy that was managed by multimodal multistage endoscopic therapy as an alternative to conventional operative repair. Case Presentation: A healthy 78-year-old Caucasian man underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by an unrecognized rectal injury culminating in emergent exploration, abdominal washout, creation of a diverting loop transverse colostomy, and resultant development of a large rectovesical fistula. Given the patient's hostile abdomen and desire for conservative management the fistula was managed through a combined cystoscopic and endoscopic procedure that utilized suturing and clipping to close the fistula. This novel technique was followed by a series of three subsequent endoscopic procedures that enabled us to gradually downsize the fistula over time and ultimately achieve complete closure. The patient's colostomy was eventually reversed with return of bowel continuity. Conclusion: Although uncommon, RVF are significant complications of pelvic surgery. The presence of abdominal/pelvic adhesions from previous surgeries or patient comorbidities can make open surgical repair extremely challenging or impracticable. Therefore, it is important to recognize and consider the use of endoscopic techniques as potential options for closure of rectovesical fistula in certain situations.

Results of the York Mason Procedure with and without Concomitant Graciloplasty to Treat Iatrogenic Rectourethral Fistulas

BACKGROUND

Rectourethral fistulas (RUFs) are rare but devastating complications after surgery or radiation therapy to the urethra, prostate, or rectum. RUF repair is challenging, especially in irradiated patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the York Mason (YM) procedure with or without concomitant gracilis muscle interposition (graciloplasty) for RUF repair.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Records of patients with an iatrogenic RUF who underwent the YM procedure between 2008 and 2018 in two university hospitals were reviewed. Data on etiology, diagnostic and operative procedures, urinary and fecal diversion, and postoperative follow-up were collected.

INTERVENTION

Twenty-eight patients underwent 33 YM procedures. Concomitant graciloplasty was performed in four (14%) primary repairs and two (7%) repairs for recurrent RUFs.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was successful RUF repair, defined as absence of symptoms and no leakage on control urethrocystography. The secondary endpoint was colostomy reversal rate.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median follow-up was 24 mo. Ten patients (36%) were irradiated previously. The ultimate success rate was 75% after a maximum of three YM procedures. Success rates were 89% and 50% in patients with nonirradiated and irradiated fistulas, respectively. In irradiated patients, the success rates of the first YM procedure with and without graciloplasty were 100% and 29%, respectively. In recurrent cases, concomitant graciloplasty did not result in better outcomes. Colostomy reversal was possible in 15 patients after successful repair. In all patients, fecal continence was intact and no anal stenosis was reported. Limitations of the study include small sample size and the retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of the YM procedure with graciloplasty resulted in higher success rates of RUF repair in patients with irradiated fistulas. Fecal continence was preserved, and colostomy reversal is feasible.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We analyzed the outcomes, complications, and colostomy reversal rate of the York Mason procedure for the repair of rectourethral fistulas (RUFs). We found that concomitant graciloplasty increases success rates in case of prior radiation therapy. Colostomy reversal is feasible after RUF repair.

[Fistula surgery]

Vesicovaginal fistulas are a rare problem in the western world but are frequent occurrences in developing countries. In Germany the most frequent cause is hysterectomy. Vesicovaginal fistulas can be treated by the transvaginal or transabdominal approach depending on the characteristics of the fistula and the patient. The incidence and complexity of urorectal fistulas increase with the number of cumulative sequences of prostate cancer treatment. Overall there is no clear consensus about the optimal surgical approach route. The surgical treatment of both vesicovaginal and urorectal fistulas is associated with high permanent fistula closure rates; however, for both entities if the fistula is discovered early enough, conservative treatment with a temporary catheter drainage can be tried, depending on the underlying cause. For both conditions fistula repair in irradiated patients shows a much lower success rate. A spontaneous closure of fistulas in radiogenic fistulas is also not to be expected.

Rectourethral Fistula Secondary to Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

An 82-year-old male with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) presented to the hospital with suprapubic pain, abdominal distension, and diarrhea. The physical examination was remarkable for an indwelling Foley's catheter. Diagnostic imaging confirmed the diagnosis of a rectourethral fistula (RUF). The most common presenting symptoms of RUF are pneumaturia, fecaluria, and urine leakage from the rectum, which may present similarly to diarrhea. He lacked the common features of RUF such as pneumaturia and fecaluria, which may be explained by a blockage of the catheter with fecal material. This case represents a rare outcome following a TURP, and it is significant due to the high morbidity associated with RUF. As such, clinicians must suspect a RUF in a post-TURP patient with diarrhea and no other obvious etiology due to the morbidity associated with RUF.

Modified York Mason technique for repair of iatrogenic recto-urinary fistula: 20 years of the Montsouris experience

PURPOSE

Iatrogenic recto-urinary fistulas are a disastrous complication of therapeutic interventions on the prostate. Many surgical approaches have been described to repair recto-urinary fistulas and no consensus has been reached regarding the better approach. The objective of this study is to present the results of our updated 20-year experience in the surgical management of recto-urinary fistula using a modified York Mason procedure.

METHODS

We proceed to a retrospective single-institution review of surgically treated patients for iatrogenic recto-urinary fistulas between 1998 and 2017 by the modified York Mason technique. Descriptive analysis of our population was performed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using Mann-Whitney and Fischer tests, respectively. All tests were two-sided with a significance level set at p value < 0.05.

RESULTS

We included 30 consecutive patients treated for iatrogenic recto-urinary fistula. The median follow-up was 76 months (2-195). The median size of the fistula was 5 mm (2-20). Successful healing of the recto-urinary fistula was observed in 80, 97, and 100% of patients after 1, 2, or 3 York Mason procedure. During the study period, no one single case of acquired urinary incontinence or durable fecal incontinence has been observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified York Mason technique is a reliable and effective procedure with a 100% success rate for the repair of small iatrogenic recto-urinary fistulas in non-irradiated patients. It has a very low morbidity rate, and no case of postoperative urine or fecal incontinence has been observed.

Transanal endoscopic surgery for complications of prior rectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Long-term complications of previous rectal surgery (e.g., enterovisceral fistula, anastomotic stricture, rectal stenosis) can be challenging problems for which transabdominal or transperineal surgery with or without definitive fecal diversion is often required. Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) might allow for local treatment of these complications, thereby saving patients from otherwise major surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing TES in the IJsselland Hospital (NL) since 1996 were recorded in a prospective database, of which twenty patients were treated for complications after previous rectal surgery. Data on prior treatment, surgical techniques, outcomes, and need for additional surgery were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were identified from the database (rectourinary fistula n = 3, rectovaginal fistula n = 5, anastomotic stricture n = 8, and rectal stenosis n = 4). One of the three (33 %) rectourinary fistulas and two of five (40 %) rectovaginal fistulas were successfully treated with TES. Anastomotic strictures were successfully treated in 5/8 (63 %) patients. Strictures after local excision of rectal tumors were successfully treated in 3/4 (75 %) patients. No minor complication and one major complication occurred (rectovaginal fistula after stenoplasty eventually requiring Hartmann's procedure).

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal treatment of anastomotic strictures, rectal stenosis, and fistula after prior rectal surgery is safe and effective in a large proportion of patients. TES should be considered as a first step in all patients presenting with these late complications after rectal surgery.

Management of Recurrent Rectourethral Fistula by York Mason Posterior Transrectal Transsphincteric Approach

Rectourethral fistula (RUF) may develop after ureterovesical and rectal intervention or radiation therapy (RT) rarely, but it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The patient will typically present with pneumaturia, faecaluria, and urinary drainage from the rectum. Diagnosis can be easily done with digital rectal examination, cystography, and urethrocystoscopy. Conservative supportive management of RUF does not appear to be successful in most patients, and management with surgical intervention remains the best treatment option. Several surgical techniques have been described including transabdominal, transanal, transperineal, combined abdominoperineal, anterior and posterior transsphincteric, transsacral, laparoscopic, robotic, and endoscopic minimally invasive approaches. There have been very few data about treatment of recurrent RUF. We would like to report the management of recurrent RUF following transurethral resection of prostate and RT for prostate carcinoma in an immunosuppressed, 75-year-old patient by York Mason posterior transrectal transsphincteric approach.

Management of rectourinary fistula after urological interventions using biodesigned mesh: first experiences of an innovative technique

PURPOSE

Rectourinary fistula (RUF) is an uncommon but devastating condition that usually occurs as a complication of surgical treatment or radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Although operative fistula repair remains the most successful treatment, there still is no consensus concerning the management of RUF. We present first experiences and transanal surgical technique using biological mesh for fistula repair after urological intervention.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2009 to December 2013, four cases of RUF were reported at our university hospital. Fistula occurred after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, open radical prostatectomy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound, respectively. All patients were initially treated with transanal Cook Biodesign™ mesh, whereas two patients received reoperation with rectal mucosa advancement flap and gracilis muscle flap interposition, respectively. Mean follow-up was 36 months (range 9-62).

RESULTS

Fistula diameters ranged from 0.6 to 3.0 cm and were located 5 to 6 cm of anocutaneous line. The time from diagnosis to fistula repair was 3 to 7 weeks. The median operative time for Cook Biodesing™ mesh procedure was 79 min (IQR 60, 98). The initial success rate for biological mesh was 50 % (2/4 patients). Larger fistulae were minimalized successfully and finally closed with reoperation mentioned above. No deterioration of continence was documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of rectourinary fistula is still challenging. Using biomaterials for fistula closure seems to be a promising and minimally invasive transanal technique in future. Further analysis including more patients is needed to clarify its exact role in comparison to traditional surgical techniques.