Pleural Empyema Following Liver Resection: A Rare But Serious Complication

Surgical chest complications after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a major abdominal operation and the intimate anatomic relation of the liver with the right hemidiaphragm predisposes the patient to various manifestations in the chest cavity. Furthermore, chronic liver disease affects pulmonary function before and after liver transplantation resulting in a considerable percentage of patients presenting with morbidity related to chest complications. This review aims to identify the potential chest complications of surgical interest during or after liver transplantation. Complications of surgical interest are defined as those conditions that necessitate an invasive procedure (such as thoracocentesis or a chest tube placement) in the chest or a surgical intervention performed by a thoracic surgeon. These complications will be classified as perioperative and postoperative; the latter will be categorized as early and late. Although thoracocentesis or a chest tube placement is usually sufficient when invasive measures are deemed necessary, in some patients, thoracic surgical interventions are warranted. A high index of suspicion is needed to recognize and treat these conditions promptly. A close collaboration between abdominal surgeons, intensive care unit physicians and thoracic surgeons is of paramount importance.

Evaluation of clinical risk factors for developing pleural empyema secondary to liver abscess

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical manifestation and predictive risk factors of pleural empyema developing during treatment of the pyogenic liver abscess.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with the liver abscess in our institution were reviewed retrospectively. Enrolled patients were classified into four groups; Group 1: patients without pleural effusion, Group 2: patients with pleural effusion and who were treated noninvasively, Group 3: patient with pleural effusion and who were treated with thoracentesis, and Group 4: patients with pleural effusion that developed into empyema. Patient characteristics, clinical manifestation, and possible risk factors in development of empyema were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients was enrolled in this study. The incidence rate of empyema was 4.27% (10 patients). The mean interval for developing pleural effusion was 5.6 ± 6.35 days. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for developing pleural effusion included the location of the liver abscess near the right diaphragm (segment 7 and 8, OR = 2.30, p = 0.048), and larger diameter of the liver abscess (OR = 1.02, p = 0.042). Among patients who developed pleural effusions, presences of mixed microorganisms from culture of liver aspirates (OR = 10.62, p = 0.044), bilateral pleural effusion (OR = 46.72, p = 0.012) and combined biliary tract inflammation (OR = 21.05, p = 0.040) were significantly associated with the need for invasive intervention including surgery on effusion.

CONCLUSION

The location of the liver abscess as well as pleural effusion, elevated inflammatory markers, and combined biliary tract inflammation may be important markers of developing pleural complication in patients with pyogenic liver abscess.

Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resections for non-colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Liver is a common metastatic site not only of colorectal but of non-colorectal neoplasms, as well. However, resection of non-colorectal liver metastases (NCRLMs) remains controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for NCRLMs.

METHODS

From a prospectively maintained database between 2000 and 2018, patients undergoing LLR for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) and NCRLMs were selected. Clinicopathologic, operative, short- and long-term outcome data were collected, analyzed, and compared among patients with CRLMs and NCRLMs.

RESULTS

The primary tumor was colorectal in 354 (82.1%), neuroendocrine in 21 (4.9%), and non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine in the remaining 56 (13%) patients. Major postoperative morbidities were 12.7%, 19%, and 3.6%, respectively (p = 0.001), whereas the mortality was 0.6% for patients with CRLMs and zero for patients with NCRLMs. The rate of R₁ surgical margin was comparable (p = 0.432) among groups. According to the survival analysis, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 76.1% and 64.3% in the CRLM group, 57.1% and 42.3% in the neuroendocrine liver metastase (NELM) group, 33% and 20.8% in the non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastase (NCRNNELM) group (p = 0.001), respectively. Three- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 88.3% and 82.7% in the CRLM group, 85.7% and 70.6% in the NELM group, 71.4% and 52.9% in the NCRNNELM group (p = 0.001), respectively. In total, 113 out of 354 (31.9%) patients with CRLMs, 2 out of 21(9.5%) with NELMs, and 8 out of 56 (14.3%) patients with NCRNNELMs underwent repeat LLR for recurrent metastatic tumors.

CONCLUSION

LLR is safe and feasible in the context of a multimodal management where an aggressive surgical approach, necessitating even complex procedures for bilobar multifocal metastases and repeat hepatectomy for recurrences, is the mainstay and may be of benefit in the long-term survival, in selected patients with NCRNNELMs.

Microbe Isolation from Blood, Central Venous Catheters, and Fluid Collections after Liver Resections

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to evaluate the microbe species responsible for bacteremia or infections related to central venous catheter (CVC) or fluid collections after liver resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 112 patients (68 males, 44 females) who underwent liver resection over a period of 63 months were reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics, intra-operative and post-operative data, and the results from cultures of peripheral blood, CVC tips and drained intra-abdominal or intra-throracic fluid collections were collected.

RESULTS

There were positive blood cultures in 20 patients (17.9%). Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and bacteria of enteric flora were the micro-organisms found most frequently and half of the cases had multiple isolated microbe species. The construction of a bilioenteric anastomosis was an independent risk factor for microbe isolation in peripheral blood (odds ratio [OR]: 11, p = 0.01). Furthermore, there were positive cultures of the CVC tip in 14 patients (12.5%), with CoNS being the micro-organism found most frequently and most cases had only one isolated microbe species. No specific risk factor for catheter-related infections was detected. In addition, there were positive cultures of drained fluid collections in 19 patients (17%), with bacteria of enteric flora being the micro-organisms found most frequently and the majority of cases had multiple isolated microbe species. The construction of a bilioenteric anastomosis (OR: 23.5, p = 0.002) and the laparoscopic approach (OR: 4.7, p = 0.0496) were independent risk factors for microbe isolation in drained fluid collections. Finally, the presence of positive blood cultures was associated with the presence of positive culture of CVC tips (p = 0.018) and drained fluid collections (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative bacteremia, colonization of CVCs, and contamination of fluid collections occur frequently after liver resections and various microbe species may be involved. Patients who undergo hepatectomy and a synchronous construction of a bilioenteric anastomosis are at increased risk of bacteremia development and contamination of fluid collections.