Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): A Size-Location-Matched Case-Control Study

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for the management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncologic results of laparoscopic versus open surgery for the treatment of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study to minimize heterogeneity between groups and focus on the difference between surgery strategies.

SETTINGS

Eleven Chinese tertiary hospitals participated in this study.

PATIENTS

A total of 364 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors were retrospectively analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relapse-free survival, postoperative hospital stay length, and 30-day postoperative complication rate were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

We enrolled 214 patients who underwent surgical operation for primary localized rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. After propensity score matching, 134 cases involved in the comparison (67 laparoscopic vs 67 open surgery) were randomly matched (1:1) by sex, age, tumor size, tumor site, and neoadjuvant therapy. The laparoscopic surgery group had superior relapse-free survival (χ2 = 4.46, p = 0.04), and fewer complications (6.0% vs 25.4%, p = 0.002). No significant difference was found in the length of postoperative hospital stay between the laparoscopic surgery and open surgery groups (9.66 ± 5.42 vs. 10.64 ± 4.93, p = 0.28). Subgroup analysis showed that the laparoscopic surgery group had superior relapse-free survival (χ2 = 4.14, p = 0.04) and fewer complications after surgery (2.9% vs 24.4%, p = 0.01) in the rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors ≤5 cm subgroup.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the nature of retrospective reviews and relatively short follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery offers a safe and feasible option for the radical resection of primary localized rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors, especially for patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors ≤5 cm. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B764.

CIRUGA LAPAROSCPICA VERSUS CIRUGA ABIERTA PARA TUMORES DEL ESTROMA GASTROINTESTINAL DE RECTO UN ANLISIS MULTICNTRICO EMPAREJADO POR PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN

ANTECEDENTES:Se desconoce la seguridad y factibilidad de la cirugía laparoscópica para el tratamiento de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados quirúrgicos y oncológicos de la cirugía laparoscópica versus cirugía abierta para el tratamiento de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico emparejado por puntuación de propensión para minimizar la heterogeneidad entre los grupos y centrarse en las diferencias entre las estrategias quirúrgicas.AJUSTES:Once hospitales terciarios de la China participaron en este estudio.PACIENTES:Se analizaron retrospectivamente un total de 364 pacientes con tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto confirmados patológicamente.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Supervivencia sin recidiva, duración de la estancia hospitalaria postquirúrgica y tasa de complicaciones postquirúrgicas a los 30 días.RESULTADOS:Inscribimos a 214 pacientes que fueron sometidos a cirugía por tumores primariamente localizados del estroma gastrointestinal de recto. Después del emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión, 134 casos involucrados en la comparación (67 laparoscópicos versus 67 cirugía abierta) fueron emparejados aleatoriamente (1: 1) por sexo, edad, tamaño del tumor, sitio del tumor y terapia neoadyuvante. El grupo de cirugía laparoscópica tuvo una supervivencia sin recidiva superior (χ2 = 4,46, p = 0,04) y menos complicaciones (6,0% frente a 25,4%, p = 0,002). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria postquirúrgica entre los grupos de cirugía laparoscópica y cirugía abierta (9,66 ± 5,42 frente a 10,64 ± 4,93, p = 0,28). El análisis de subgrupos mostró que el grupo de cirugía laparoscópica tuvo una supervivencia sin recidiva superior (χ2 = 4,14, p = 0,04) y menos complicaciones después de la cirugía (2,9% frente a 24,4%, p = 0,01) en el subgrupo de tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto ≤ 5 cm.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza de la revisión retrospectiva y el período de seguimiento relativamente corto son limitaciones de este estudio.CONCLUSIONES:La cirugía laparoscópica ofrece una opción segura y factible para la resección radical de tumores primariamente localizados del estroma gastrointestinal de recto, especialmente para pacientes con tumores ≤5 cm. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B764.

Early experience of laparoscopic resection and comparison with open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a multicenter retrospective study

The advantages of laparoscopic resection over open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are not conclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative and oncologic outcome of laparoscopic resection for gastric GIST, compared to open surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected database of 1019 patients with gastric GIST after surgical resection at 13 Korean and 2 Japanese institutions. The surgical and oncologic outcomes were compared between laparoscopic and open group, through 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The laparoscopic group (N = 318) had a lower rate of overall complications (3.5% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.024) and wound complications (0.6% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.037), shorter hospitalization days (6.68 ± 4.99 vs. 8.79 ± 6.50, P < 0.001) than the open group (N = 318). The superiority of the laparoscopic approach was also demonstrated in patients with tumors larger than 5 cm, and at unfavorable locations. The recurrence-free survival was not different between the two groups, regardless of tumor size, locational favorableness, and risk classifications. Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor size larger than 5 cm, higher mitotic count, R1 resection, and tumor rupture during surgery were independent risk factors for recurrence. Laparoscopic surgery provides lower rates of complications and shorter hospitalizations for patients with gastric GIST than open surgery.

Complete wedge resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumour: A case series of three patients

INTRODUCTION

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are rare. Therefore, difficulties are experienced when selecting the appropriate surgical procedure in patients with duodenal GISTs. This report presents the cases of three patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent wedge resection. This report would help surgeons identify clinical features and surgical procedures in patients with duodenal GISTs.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Three patients were diagnosed with duodenal submucosal tumours. The first patient presented with melena, the second with postoperative anaemia, and the third with an incidental finding of a large abdominal tumour after presenting with ischaemic colitis. All tumours arose in the 2nd portion of the duodenum and measured 3.5, 3, and 9.2 cm, respectively. Wedge resection of the duodenum was performed in all patients. In patients one and two, simple closure of duodenal wall was performed after wedge resection. In patient three, side-to-side anastomosis with the jejunum was performed because a large area of the wall was removed using the wedge resection technique. Pancreatoduodenectomy was avoided in all patients. Recurrence was not noted in any patient.

DISCUSSION

Since GISTs are not generally associated with lymph node metastasis, local resection with negative margins is sufficient to surgically manage patients with GISTs.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated the effectiveness of performing wedge resection for duodenal GISTs not in close proximity to the ampulla of Vater. Moreover, less invasive procedures should be adopted in patients with duodenal GISTs.

[Surgical and interdisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors]

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent potentially malignant mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The treatment of GISTs has been revolutionized since imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors were introduced for the treatment of GISTs, which inhibit the tyrosine kinases c‑KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) alpha. Even after the introduction of this targeted treatment GISTs can only be cured by surgical resection. With interdisciplinary multimodal treatment the prognosis of metastasized GIST can now be further improved by surgical resection of the primary tumor and the metastases, potentially leading to a cure. Neoadjuvant therapy can reduce the extent of surgical resection and hereby enable organ preservation and reduce surgical morbidity. To evaluate molecular and clinical predictors and to offer an optimal therapeutic plan, patients with GISTs and certainly patients with advanced GISTs should be evaluated by interdisciplinary sarcoma boards.

Current evidence on laparoscopic vs. open resection for gastric stromal tumours

Although the use of laparoscopic surgery is increasing, controversy still surrounds its application for malignant conditions. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are less demanding in terms of lymphadenectomy, meaning that laparoscopic resection might have a more defined benefit when compared with open resection. To the best of our knowledge, no randomized study exists that compares the laparoscopic and open resection of GISTs. The current study aimed to examine the relevant literature by means of a systematic review. A systematic literature search was performed individually by two authors, in which three independent databases were searched using specific search-terms. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened, as well as references to relevant articles, in order to comprise a comprehensive list of studies. Data were extracted using a detailed pre-agreed spreadsheet. Studies were evaluated according to the modified MINORS criteria. A total of 10 studies were included in the present review, yielding a total of 14 entries. The majority of studies reported significantly improved perioperative outcomes for the laparoscopic approach, including improved duration of operation, blood loss and length of hospital stay. Only four studies reported long-term outcomes and findings that were controversial, with some studies detecting no statistically significant differences, one reporting improved and one reporting worse disease-free and overall survival for the laparoscopic group. Three studies were deemed to be good quality, two of which had not reported significantly different long-term outcomes, while the third had reported significantly improved outcomes in the open resection group. While there is a clear benefit for performing laparoscopic surgery in patients with GIST with regards to perioperative outcomes, when it comes to long-term oncological outcomes, uncertainty over its application remains. The lack of randomized trials, as well as the poor reporting of retrospective studies, limits the amount of evidence that is currently available. Laparoscopic surgery for GIST is certainly safe, feasible and likely cost-effective; however, further studies are required to inform on whether this technique is superior to open resection.

Laparoscopic Partial Gastrectomy for Large Gastric GISTs

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are considered the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract and the stomach is the most frequently site affected (50-60%). The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for gastric GISTs of sizes larger than 5 cm remains unclear. It depends on the surgical skills, tumor location, and the learning curve of the surgeons.

METHODS

Between December 2013 and January 2021, 30 patients diagnosed with gastric GISTs underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy. This is a retrospective study done in Surgical Oncology unit, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt.

RESULTS

The most common tumor location was in the greater curvature in (46.7%). The mean tumor size was 9.5 cm (range 5-17 cm). All of the patients underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy. Associated splenectomy was done for only one patient. The mean operative time was 152.67 min and the estimated blood loss (EBL) was 139.33 ml. The mean hospital stay was 3.53 days. The mean follow-up period was 32.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs has become a feasible method. Patients with large tumors have the same favorable outcomes as small tumors. Large-sized GISTs may receive neoadjuvant therapy to downstage the disease and make it amenable for laparoscopic resection.

Laparoscopic resection for a large gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with diaphragm invasion following preoperative imatinib treatment: A case report

•

We experienced successful treatment for large GIST with diaphragm invasion by a combination of preoperative imatinib treatment and laparoscopic resection.

•

In the neoadjuvant imatinib, it is important to indicate cases and mediate the duration.

•

The most important point for laparoscopic resection of large GIST is how to handle it.

Introduction

Neoadjuvant imatinib for large GISTs may prevent tumor rupture and the need for extended surgery by reducing tumor size. In this study, we present a case of large gastric GIST with diaphragm invasion, due to the patient receiving laparoscopic resection following preoperative imatinib treatment.

Presentation of case

A 72-year-old woman was hospitalized with left hypochondriac pain for a month. Examinations revealed a large heterogeneous gastric mass measuring 80 mm in size, arising from the greater curvature of the corpus. The mass invaded the left thoracic diaphragm. Treatment with imatinib at an initial dosage of 400 mg/day was initiated. After a further two months of follow-up, the lesion had sustained reduction to 50 mm in size, however, the invasion to the diaphragm remained. The patient eventually underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy and partial resection of the diaphragm with curative intent. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated at one month after the surgery, however, was discontinued due to nausea. After one-year follow-up, no recurrence was noted.

Discussion

Neoadjuvant imatinib may shrink tumor size remarkably and prevent tumor rupture during surgery, and thus lead to increased rates of complete resection. To date, several publications have directly compared the oncologic results between laparoscopic and open resection for GISTs. In the present case, the tumor was movable, and moderately fixed on diaphragm. It was favorable condition for laparoscopic surgery.

Conclusions

This is the first report of a large gastric GIST invading the diaphragm that was successfully treated by laparoscopic resection after tumor reduction by neoadjuvant imatinib.

Treatment of a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Adherent to the Spleen and the Tail of the Pancreas: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal gastrointestinal tumors (GIT). Usually, they appear in patients ages 55-65 years, with no apparent difference between males and females. Their annual incidence is about 11-14 per 10⁶. They generally do not present with any prominent symptoms, appearing with the atypical symptoms of abdominal pain, weight loss, early satiety, and occasionally bleeding. Adequate surgical treatment involves sphenoid resection of the tumor within clear margins. If adjacent organs are involved, en bloc resection is the procedure of choice. CASE REPORT A 62-year-old male patient presented to the Emergency Department complaining of melena for 1 week. He underwent gastroscopy, colonoscopy and abdominal computed tomography scan, which revealed a large, exophytic, lobular mass (12.6×9.7×12 cm) of the greater curvature of the stomach. The patient underwent en bloc sphenoid gastrectomy, splenectomy, and caudal pancreatectomy. The histopathologic examination revealed findings compatible with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor located at the stomach, with low-grade malignancy (G1) and T4N0 according to TNM classification. He was discharged from the hospital on the 7th postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS GISTs are uncommon tumors of the gastrointestinal system that usually do not invade neighboring organs or develop distant metastases; therefore, local resection is usually the treatment of choice. However, in cases of large GISTs that are adherent to neighboring organs, en bloc resection and resection of adjacent organs may be inevitable.

Feasibility of robotic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors along the entire gastrointestinal tract

Robotic surgery has been proposed over the last decade as a valid option to treat gastrointestinal malignancies in a minimally invasive method, yielding encouraging results. The authors examine the outcomes of a consecutive series of patients with stromal gastrointestinal neoplasms who were operated on using a totally robotic technique. There were 36 patients in the study, with median age 70 years. Resected tumors were located in the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine and rectum. Perioperative morbidity was 8% and no mortality occurred. R0 resection was achieved in all cases. At a median follow-up of 25 months, 35 patients were disease free while there was one case of death related to metastatic disease. Robotic surgery is a valid option to resect gastrointestinal stromal tumors anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract in a minimally invasive manner.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours of stomach: Robot-assisted excision with the da Vinci Surgical System regardless of size and location site

AIMS

The role of minimally invasive surgery of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) of the stomach remains uncertain especially for large and/or difficult located tumours. We are hereby presenting a single-centre series of robot-assisted resections using the da Vinci Surgical System (Si or Xi).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Data of patients undergoing robot-assisted treatment of gastric GIST were retrieved from the prospectively collected institutional database and a retrospective analysis was performed. Patients were stratified according to size and location of the tumour. Difficult cases (DCs) were considered for size if tumour was >50 mm and/or for location if the tumour was Type II, III or IV sec. Privette/Al-Thani classification.

RESULTS

Between May 2010 and February 2017, 12 consecutive patients underwent robot-assisted treatment of GIST at our institution. DCs were 10/12 cases (83.3%), of which 6/10 (50%) for location, 2/10 (25%) for size and 2/10 (25%) for both. The da Vinci Si was used in 8 patients, of which 6 (75%) were DC, and the da Vinci Xi in 4, all of which (100%) were DC. In all patients, excision was by wedge resection. All lesions had microscopically negative resection margins. There was no conversion to open surgery, no tumour ruptures or spillage and no intraoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Our experience suggests a positive role of the robot da Vinci in getting gastric GIST removal with a conservative approach, regardless of size and location site. Comparative studies with a greater number of patients are necessary for a more robust assessment.

Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors Originating From the Muscularis Propria: A 69-Case Series

OBJECTIVE

This report describes a mini-invasive technique called endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR) for the treatment of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 69 patients with gastric SETs originating from the MP at our hospital between September 2009 and July 2016. The data from each patient were reviewed, including patient information, tumor characteristics, procedure-related data, and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Successful complete resection by EFR was achieved in 69 cases. The complete resection rate was 100%, and the mean resected tumor size was 2.25±1.40 (range, 0.6 to 6) cm. No residual tumor recurrence was detected during the follow-up period in 57 patients. The other 12 patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

EFR seems to be a safe and effective technique for the treatment of patients with gastric SETs originating from the MP.

Is the Surgical Margin in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Different?

Background

Radical surgical excision is the mainstay of therapy of primary, nonmetastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and margin status after surgery is a significant prognostic factor.

Methods and Results

The aim of this paper is to review principles in primary GIST surgery, i.e. differences between R0, R1, and R2 resection, to describe how surgical margin status and tumor intraperitoneal rupture influence the patients' outcome, and how this may be effected by neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment in locally advanced tumors. A systematic search of literature published between 2000 and 2018 was performed regarding this topic.

Conclusion

Correct interpretation of margin status after surgery can be affected by many factors during operation and preparation of tissue.

A rare case of perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the greater omentum

Background

A tumor composed exclusively or predominantly of human melanin black 45 (HMB45)-positive epithelioid cells is called a perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa). We report a very rare case of a PEComa of the greater omentum.

Case presentation

MRI conducted to examine the orthopedic disease of the patients, a 49-year-old Japanese woman, also identified a tumor in her pelvis. A CT scan revealed a tumor mass on the right side of the pelvic floor and clear nutrient vessels originating from the splenic and celiac arteries. An omental primary tumor or accessory spleen was thus suspected, and tumor resection was performed. The tumor was a light brown solid tumor with a smooth margin, measuring 5.2 × 3.8 × 3.5 cm. Histopathologically, the tumor was composed mainly of spindle and epithelioid cells, and large and small blood vessel formation was observed. In the immunohistochemical staining, tumor cells were positive for human melanin black 45 (HMB-45) and Melan-A and partially positive for alpha-smooth muscle actin. The final diagnosis was PEComa of the greater omentum.

Conclusions

Although omental PEComa is very rare, it should be considered as a differential disease of an omental primary tumor.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

GI stromal tumors (GISTs) are neoplasms with a varying malignancy potential ranging from virtually indolent tumors to rapidly progressing cancers. GISTs occur throughout the intestinal tract, and most harbor an activating mutation in either KIT or platelet-derived growth factor A ( PDGFRA). Diagnosis is made using immunohistochemistry, but molecular testing with mutation analysis is paramount for selection of appropriate therapy. Most small GISTs are cured with surgery. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has led to substantial improvements in survival, both for patients with localized GIST and those with advanced disease. Adjuvant therapy with imatinib benefits patients with a high risk of recurrence, with studies suggesting most benefit with at least 3 years of therapy. Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy should be considered for patients requiring extensive surgery, aiming at shrinking the tumor to allow organ preservation and less extensive surgery. The following three TKIs have been approved for the management of advanced disease: imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib; imatinib is usually the best tolerated of the three and the standard first-line treatment. TKIs benefit the majority of patients with advanced GIST but have no or limited efficacy in patients with the PDGFRA D842V mutation or patients with GIST lacking KIT and PDGFRA mutations. Surgery, the mainstay of primary tumor management, also plays a role in the advanced disease setting for selected patients, as do some other approaches such as palliative radiation therapy. Research continues to identify novel therapies, in particular effective agents to treat TKI-refractory disease.