Repeated Resections of Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Provide Long-Term Survival

RAS mutant transverse colon cancer with multiple liver metastases achieving long-term disease-free survival with postoperative maintenance therapy with aflibercept + FOLFIRI and four repeated radical resections: a case report

BACKGROUND

Management of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) requires a multidisciplinary approach. For patients with progression of RAS mutant tumors, the choice of angiogenesis inhibitors can be controversial. Here, we report a patient with RAS mutant CRLMs achieving long-term disease-free survival with repeated R0 resections and perioperative treatment, especially aflibercept + FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, levofolinate, irinotecan), which may have prevented long-term recurrence.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 37 year-old woman diagnosed with RAS mutant transverse colon cancer with 19 LMs. As the metastases were limited to the liver, we introduced systemic chemotherapy aiming at conversion surgery. After six cycles of bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil, levofolinate, oxaliplatin, irinotecan), we performed partial hepatectomy for all LMs, and left hemicolectomy for the primary tumor after another four cycles of bevacizumab + FOLFIRI. Three months after surgery, the patient presented with massive ovarian metastases with carcinomatous ascites. We conducted bilateral oophorectomy, and initiated aflibercept + FOLFIRI therapy considering the possibility of resistance to bevacizumab. The patient was recurrence-free for 2 years during aflibercept + FOLFIRI treatment. After its discontinuation, two distant metastases developed. Both were resectable and the patient achieved recurrence-free survival of 2 years and 3 months after the last operation (6 years since initiation of treatment), without additional chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that multidisciplinary treatment aimed at complete resection could lead to long-term survival even in patients with repeated recurrence of CRLMs. Aflibercept + FOLFIRI could be effective in controlling metastasis of RAS mutant colon cancer even after treatment with bevacizumab.

Colorectal cancer and dormant metastases: Put to sleep or destroy?

After reading the review by An et al "Biological factors driving colorectal cancer metastasis", which covers the problem of the metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC), I had a desire to discuss with readers one of the exciting problems associated with dormant metastases. Most deaths from CRCs are caused by metastases, which can be detected both at diagnosis of the primary tumor and several years or even decades after treatment. This is because tumor cells that enter the bloodstream can be destroyed by the immune system, cause metastatic growth, or remain dormant for a long time. Dormant tumor cells may not manifest themselves throughout a person's life or, after some time and under appropriate conditions, may give rise to the growth of metastases. In this editorial, we will discuss the most important features of dormant metastases and the mechanisms of premetastatic niche formation, as well as factors that contribute to the activation of dormant metastases in CRCs. We will pay special attention to the possible mechanisms involved in the formation of circulating tumor cell complexes and the choice of therapeutic strategies that promote the dormancy or destruction of tumor cells in CRCs.

Surgical and Interventional Management of Lung Metastasis: Surgical Assessment, Resection, Ablation, Percutaneous Interventions

The lungs are the second most common site of metastases for colorectal cancer after the liver. Pulmonary metastases can be identified at the time of diagnosis of the primary tumor, or metachronously. About 20% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop pulmonary metastases. The best options for treatment include a multidisciplinary treatment approach consisting of surgical resection whenever possible, and chemotherapy. Surgical options most often include minimally invasive segmentectomy or wedge resection, while patients unable to have surgery may benefit from radio frequency ablation or radiation treatment. Prognosis is dependent on preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, number, and location of metastatic lesions, and resectability of primary tumor. Overall, pulmonary metastases are best treated by complete resection whenever possible.

Long-term outcomes and early recurrence after resection for metachronous pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Properly selecting patients for aggressive curative resection for pulmonary metastases (PMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is desirable. We purposed to clarify prognostic factors and risk factors for early recurrence after metachronous PM resection.

METHODS

Clinical data of 151 patients who underwent R0 resection for metachronous PMs from CRC at two institutions between 2008 and 2021 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (50.3%) were male, and the median age was 71 (42-91) years. The numbers of colon/rectal cancers were 76/75, with pStage I/II/III/IV/unknown in 15/34/86/13/3. The duration from primary surgery to PM was 19.7 (1.0-106.4) months. The follow-up period was 41.9 (0.3-156.2) months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 75.1%, 53.7%, and 51.1%, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 97.7%, 87.5%, and 68.2%. On multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis of the primary lesion (HR 1.683, 95%CI 1.003-2.824, p = 0.049) was an independent predictor of poor RFS, and history of resection for extrapulmonary metastasis (e-PM) (HR 2.328, 95%CI 1.139-4.761, p = 0.021) was an independent predictor of poor OS. Patients who experienced early recurrence (< 6 months) after PM resection showed poorer OS than others (3-year OS 50.8% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, e-PM was an independent predictor of early recurrence after PM resection (OR 3.989, 95%CI 1.002-15.885, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Since a history of e-PM was a predictor of early recurrence and poor OS after R0 resection for PM, surgical treatment of patients with a history of e-PM should be considered carefully.

Successful multidisciplinary therapy for a patient with liver metastasis from ascending colon adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Liver metastasis is the most common form of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer, and the only possible curative treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is hepatectomy. However, approximately 25% of patients with CRLM have indications for liver resection at the initial diagnosis. Strategies aimed at downstaging large or multifocal tumors to enable curative resection are appealing.

CASE SUMMARY

A 42-year-old man was diagnosed with ascending colon cancer and liver metastases. Due to the huge lesion size and compression of the right portal vein, the liver metastases were initially diagnosed as unresectable lesions. The patient was treated with preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) consisting of 5-fluorouracil/Leucovorin/oxaliplatin/Endostar^®. After four courses, radical right-sided colectomy and ileum transverse colon anastomosis were performed. Postoperatively, the pathological analysis revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with necrosis and negative margins. Thereafter, S7/S8 partial hepatectomy was performed after two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathological examination of the resected specimen revealed a pathologically complete response (pCR). Intrahepatic recurrence was detected more than two months after the operation, and the patient was then treated with TACE consisting of irinotecan/Leucovorin/fluorouracil therapy plus Endostar^®. Subsequently, the patient was treated with a γ-knife to enhance local control. Notably, a pCR was reached, and the patient's overall survival time was > 9 years.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary treatment can promote the conversion of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastasis and facilitate complete pathological remission of liver lesions.

Predicting the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases

•

Predicting the benefit from Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of colorectal cancer metastases.

•

CLInical Categorical Algorithm (CLICAL©) – a predictive algorithm applied to SBRT.

•

The benefit from SBRT varies among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

•

CLICAL© may be used as a screening tool for SBRT referrals.

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Tumor-suppressive role of Smad ubiquitination regulatory factor 2 in patients with colorectal cancer

Smad ubiquitination regulatory factor 2 (Smurf2) plays various roles in cancer progression. However, the correlation between Smurf2 and clinical outcomes has not been determined in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases. We analyzed 66 patients with colorectal cancer who developed liver metastases. Smurf2 expression was assessed using immunohistochemical analysis of primary and metastatic liver tumors. High Smurf2 expression in both primary and metastatic tumors was significantly associated with longer overall survival time and time to surgical failure. Multivariate analyses revealed that low Smurf2 expression in primary tumors was an independent predictor of poor prognosis. In vitro experiments using colon cancer cell lines demonstrated that short interfering RNA knockdown of Smurf2 increased cell migration and tumor sphere formation. Western blot analyses revealed that Smurf2 knockdown increased the protein expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). Thus, in summary, high Smurf2 expression in cancer cells was found to be an independent predictor of better prognosis in patients with primary colorectal cancer and consequent liver metastases. The tumor-suppressive role of Smurf2 was found to be associated with cell migration and EpCAM expression; hence, Smurf2 can be considered a positive biomarker of cancer stem cell-like properties.

Liver Transplantation as a Curative Approach for Patients With Nonresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases

OBJECTIVES

Liver transplant is emerging as a potential treatment option for patients with isolated colorectal liver metastasis. In this review article, we analyzed the published literature on liver transplant outcomes in such patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four prospective studies documenting the clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis who underwent liver transplant were analyzed to study the feasibility of liver transplant in such patients.

RESULTS

The SECA-II trial demonstrated the highest overall survival of 100%, 83%, and 83% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, and disease-free survival of 53%, 44%, and 35%, respectively, with a narrow inclusion criterion. Conversely, extended criteria for selection and donors in arm D of the same trial resulted in median overall survival and disease-free survival of 18 and 4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplant provided more prolonged overall survival compared with other therapeutic modalities. Patients with isolated colorectal liver metastasis of less aggressive biology, good performance status, at least 6 weeks of chemotherapy, low clinical risk scores, and negative nodal disease should be considered for patient selection. Moreover, exclusion criteria consisting of patients with the right-sided primary tumor, less than 3 years to liver transplant after diagnosis, and elevation of carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) in the presence of BRAF mutation should be explored.

Para-aortic lymph node dissection in left-sided colorectal cancer: Risk factors, prognostic impact, and therapeutic value

AIM

This study aimed to clarify risk factors, prognostic impact, and the therapeutic value of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) dissection in left-sided colorectal cancer.

METHOD

One hundred and fifty-four patients who underwent primary tumor resection and PALN dissection for left-sided colorectal cancer were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for PALN metastasis. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

PALN metastasis was pathologically confirmed in 47 patients (30.5%). Postoperative complications occurred in 42 patients (27.3%). Pathological N stage (OR = 4.661, p = 0.034) and inferior mesenteric artery LNs metastasis (OR = 6.048, p = 0.003) remained to be independently associated with PALN metastasis, the 5-year OS rate and median survival in patients with PALN metastasis was 37.7% and 24 months. Elevated preoperative serum CA19-9 level (HR = 1.006, p = 0.007), number of positive LNs > 7 (HR = 7.263, p = 0.001), and mucinous adenocarcinoma or signet ring cell carcinoma (HR = 6.511, p = 0.001) were independently associated with OS in patients with PALN metastasis.

CONCLUSION

PALN dissection in addition to primary tumor resection have acceptable postoperative complications and may be oncologically beneficial in selected left-sided colorectal cancer patients with clinically suspicious PALN metastasis.

Surgical Roles in the Management of Metachronus Para-aortic Lymph Node Recurrence and Synchronous Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background The relative rarity of synchronous para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis (SPM) and metachronous PALN recurrence (MPR) in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients leads to a limited number of studies on patient management, and no treatment guidelines have been established to date.

Objective To assess the prognostic, predictive roles, and long-term outcomes of different management strategies for isolated MPR and SPM in CRC patients to establish the best one.

Materials and Methods We included 35 CRC patients with isolated MPR and 25 patients with isolated SPM who underwent curative R0 resection. We performed PALN dissection (PALND) in 15 cases in MPR group and in 10 cases in the SPM group; all remaining patients in both groups underwent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) without further surgical intervention. During the study period of about 5 years, we compared the patients who underwent PALND and those who underwent CRT.

Results The overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were significantly longer in patients who underwent PALND (p = 0.049 and 0.036 respectively).

Conclusions We showed that PALND in cases of CRC patients with SPM and MPR previously submitted to R0 resection was associated with favorable outcomes and better patient survival.

[Results of redo liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze patients undergoing redo liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 14 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent several redo liver resections for metastatic lesions between September 2011 and June 2021. Mean age of patients was 63.5 years. Left-sided colonic G2 adenocarcinoma T4N1-2 prevailed (wild-type KRAS).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (100%) underwent two liver resections, 7 (50%) - three resections, 1 (7.1%) - four resections. Mean period between the first and the second liver resections was 16.2 months, between the second and the third resections - 9.9 months, between the third and the fourth resections - 5 months. Maximum follow-up period after primary surgery was 9 years and 9 months. Seventy-five percent of patients were alive after 34.2 months, 50% - after 58.9 months. N+ status of colorectal tumor decreased survival while KRAS mutation and synchronous metastatic liver lesions increased survival.

CONCLUSION

Redo liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer are safe and ensure favorable long-term survival in certain patients.

Clinical outcomes following colorectal resection of colorectal cancer with simultaneous hepatic and pulmonary metastases at the time of diagnosis

PURPOSE

There are no established treatment strategies for patients with hepatic and pulmonary metastases at the time of primary colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis. This study assessed patients undergoing complete resection of primary CRC and hepatic and pulmonary metastases, to evaluate long-term outcomes and clarify clinicopathological factors associated with failure of complete resection.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis enrolled patients at Shizuoka Cancer Center between 2002 and 2018 who underwent colorectal resection with curative intent for primary CRC with hepatic and pulmonary metastases. The curative resection (CR) group comprised patients who underwent complete resection of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions, and the non-curative resection (Non-CR) group consisted of those in whom resection of the metastatic lesions was not performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine clinicopathological factors associated with non-curative resection.

RESULTS

Of 26 total patients, the CR and Non-CR groups consisted of 14 (54%) and 12 patients (46%), respectively. In the CR group, the 3-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 92.9% and 28.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that pathological stage T4 (odds ratio 8.58, 95% confidence interval 1.13-65.20, p = 0.04) was independently associated with non-curative resection.

CONCLUSION

The percentage of patients undergoing complete resection of primary CRC and metastatic lesions was 56%, and the 3-year OS rate was 92.9%. Resection of primary CRC and metastatic lesions was considered to be appropriate in this population, and pathological stage T4 tumor was associated with incomplete resection of metastatic tumors.

Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing redo liver resections for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a European multi-center study

Background

Laparoscopic redo resections for colorectal metastases are poorly investigated. This study aims to explore long-term results after second, third, and fourth resections.

Material and methods

Prospectively updated databases of primary and redo laparoscopic liver resections in six European HPB centers were analyzed. Procedure-related overall survival after first, second, third, and fourth resections were evaluated. Furthermore, patients without liver recurrence after first liver resection were compared to those with one redo, two or three redo, and patients with palliative treatment for liver recurrence after first laparoscopic liver surgery. Survival was calculated both from the date of the first liver resection and from the date of the actual liver resection. In total, 837 laparoscopic primary and redo liver resections performed in 762 patients were included (630 primary, 172 first redo, 29 second redo, and 6 third redo). Patients were bunched into four groups: Group 1—without hepatic recurrence after primary liver resection (n = 441); Group 2—with liver recurrence who underwent only one laparoscopic redo resection (n = 154); Group 3—with liver recurrence who underwent two laparoscopic redo resections (n = 29); Group 4—with liver recurrence who have not been found suitable for redo resections (n = 138).

Results

No significant difference has been found between the groups in terms of baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes. Rate of positive resection margin was higher in the group with palliative recurrence (group 4). Five-year survival calculated from the first liver resection was 67%, 62%, 84%, and 7% for group 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Procedure-specific 5-year overall survival was 50% after primary laparoscopic liver resection, 52% after the 1st reoperation, 52% after the 2nd, and 40% after the 3rd reoperation made laparoscopic.

Conclusions

Multiple redo recurrences can be performed laparoscopically with good long-term results. Liver recurrence does not aggravate prognosis as long as the patient is suitable for reoperation.

Long-term outcome for colorectal liver metastases: combining hepatectomy with intraoperative ultrasound guided open microwave ablation versus hepatectomy alone

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term outcome of combining hepatectomy with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS)-guided open microwave ablation (MWA) versus hepatectomy alone in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM).

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy alone (HT group; 380 patients) or hepatectomy combined with IOUS-guided open MWA (HT + MWA group; 57 patients) from April 2002 to September 2018 was conducted at our center. A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to reduce data bias between the two groups.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not significantly different between the two groups after matching. Although intrahepatic recurrence was more frequent in the HT + MWA group in both the whole and matched cohort, the two groups exhibited similar rates of extrahepatic recurrence as well as concomitant intra- and extrahepatic recurrence. A higher number of CRLM (>3), larger maximum-size and absence of response to induction chemotherapy were independent risk factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

The oncological outcomes of hepatectomy combined with intraoperative open ablation was not significantly different to hepatectomy alone and should be considered as a safe and fair option for patients with difficultly resectable CRLM.

Recurrence patterns and their effects on clinical outcomes after R1 resection of colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

The prognostic significance of the surgical margin status remains controversial for patients who undergo hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. This study evaluated the influence of R1 resection on recurrence patterns and prognosis in these patients.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and December 2016, 232 consecutive Japanese patients underwent initial hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Their medical records were reviewed to evaluate recurrence and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Relative to patients with R0 resection, patients with R1 resection had significantly poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). However, after propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in RFS and OS associated with the margin status. Nevertheless, R1 resection was associated with a significantly higher incidence of intrahepatic recurrence and early recurrence, while R0 resection was associated with a significantly higher re-resection rate for hepatic recurrence. Only eight of 55 patients with R1 resection developed recurrence at the R1 resection margin, whereas 36 patients developed recurrence at other sites/organs.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with similar characteristics, R1 resection does not affect long-term outcomes. This suggests that R1 resection itself is not a cause of a poor prognosis, but rather a potent indicator of aggressive tumor biology.

Differential effects of KRAS mutational status on long-term survival according to the timing of colorectal liver metastases

Background

The relationship between KRAS mutational status and timing of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) remains unclear. This study evaluated the relationship between KRAS mutational status and long-term survival in patients with synchronous CRLM.

Methods

Of the 255 patients who underwent initial hepatic resection for CRLM between January 2001 and December 2018, the KRAS mutational status was examined in 101 patients. Medical records of these patients were reviewed to evaluate recurrence and survival outcomes.

Results

KRAS mutant status was identified in 38 patients (37.6%). The overall survival (OS) was significantly better in patients with wild-type KRAS than in those with mutant KRAS status. In patients with synchronous metastases, the OS of patients with wild-type KRAS was significantly better than those with mutant KRAS. Multivariate analyses indicated shorter OS to be independently associated with positive primary lymph node, and large tumor size and R1 resection in patients with metachronous metastasis, whereas to be independently associated with mutant KRAS status in patients with synchronous metastasis. Furthermore, in the subgroup of patients with synchronous metastases, the repeat resection rate for hepatic recurrence was significantly high in those with wild type KRAS than in those with mutant KRAS.

Conclusion

KRAS mutation is an independent prognostic factor in patients with synchronous CRLM, but not in patients with metachronous CRLM.

Results of redo pulmonary metastasectomy

Repeat surgical resection (redo) for pulmonary metastases is a questionable, albeit intriguing topic. We performed an extensive review of the literature, to specifically analyze results of redo pulmonary metastasectomies. We reviewed a total of 3,523 papers. Among these, 2,019 were excluded for redundancy and 1,105 because they were not completely retrievable. Out of 399 eligible papers, 183 had missing information or missing abstract, while 96 lacked data on survival. A total of 120 papers dated from 1991 onwards were finally included. Data regarding mortality, major morbidity, prognostic factors and long-term survivals of the first redo pulmonary metastasectomies were retrieved and analyzed. Homogeneity of data was affected by the lack of guidelines for redo pulmonary metastasectomy and the risks of bias when comparing different studies has to be considered. According to the histology sub-types, redo metastasectomies papers were grouped as: colorectal (n=42), sarcomas (n=36), others (n=20) and all histologies (n=22); the total number of patients was 3,015. Data about chemotherapy were reported in half of the papers, whereas targeted or immunotherapy in 9. None of these associated therapies, except chemotherapy in two records, did significantly modify outcomes. Disease-free interval before the redo procedure was the prevailing prognostic factor and nearly all papers showed a significant correlation between patients’ comorbidities and prognosis. No perioperative mortality was reported, while perioperative major morbidity was overall quite low. Where available, overall survival after the first redo metastasectomy ranged from 10 to 72 months, with a 5-years survival of approximately 50%. The site of first recurrence after the redo procedure was mainly lung. Despite the data retrievable from literature are heterogeneous and confounding, we can state that redo lung metastasectomy is worthwhile when the lesions are resectable and the perioperative risk is low. At present, there are no “non-surgical” therapeutic options to replace redo pulmonary metastasectomies.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of a Transdiaphragmatic Approach for Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Liver and Lung Metastases

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes for simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver and lung metastases are unknown. To address this gap, we compared outcomes and costs of three strategies for such resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of synchronous colorectal liver and lung metastases during 2000-2018 were grouped by surgical strategy: simultaneous resection via a transdiaphragmatic approach (transdiaphragmatic) or separate abdominal and thoracic incisions (transthoracic) and nonsimultaneous staged resection (staged). Operative and postoperative outcomes, survival, cumulative lung recurrence, and surgical costs were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 63 patients, 29 with transdiaphragmatic, 14 with transthoracic, and 20 with staged resection. The groups had similar demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics. Lung resection-associated blood loss for the transdiaphragmatic group was similar to that for the transthoracic group (P = .165) but lower than that for the staged group (P = .006). Hospital stay was shorter for the simultaneous groups than for the staged group (P = .007). Median surgical costs were significantly higher in the staged group ($130,733, interquartile range [IQR] $91,109-$173,573) than in the transdiaphragmatic ($70,620, IQR $58,376-$86,203, P < .001) or transthoracic ($62,991, IQR $57,405-$98,862, P < .001) group but did not differ between the transdiaphragmatic and transthoracic groups (P = .786). Rates of postoperative complications, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and cumulative lung recurrence were similar among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver and lung metastases via a transdiaphragmatic approach is associated with lower blood loss, lower costs, and similar survival compared with staged resection.

Abdominal lymph node recurrence from colorectal cancer: Resection should be considered as a curative treatment in patients with controlled disease

BACKGROUND

Lymph node recurrences (LNR) from colorectal cancer (CRC) still represent a therapeutic challenge, as standardized recommendations have yet to be established. The aim of this study was to analyze short- and long-term oncological outcomes following resection of LNR from CRC.

METHODS

All patients with previously resected CRC who underwent histopathologically confirmed LNR resection in 3 tertiary referral centers between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed, mainly recurrence-free and overall survival. Further recurrences following LNR resection were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 18 patients were included. Primary CRC was left-sided in 16 (89%) patients, staged T3-4 in 15 (83%), N+ in 14 (78%) and presented with synchronous metastases in 8 (43%). Median time interval between primary CRC and LNR resections was 31 months. Performed lymphadenectomies were aortocaval (n = 10), pelvic (n = 7), in hepatic pedicle (n = 3) and mesenteric (n = 1). Four patients had associated liver metastases resection. Three (17%) presented with postoperative complications, of which one Clavien-Dindo 3. Fourteen (78%) patients presented with further recurrences after a mean delay of 9 months, with 36% of patients presenting with early (<6 months) recurrence. Five (36%) patients could undergo secondary recurrence resection and 3 (21%) patients radiotherapy. Median overall survival following LNR resection reached 44 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Current results suggest that LNR resection is feasible and associated with improved survival, in selected patients. Longer time interval between primary CRC resection and LNR occurrence appeared to be a favorable prognostic factor whereas multisite recurrence appeared to be associated with impaired long-term survival.

Past, present, and future perspectives of pulmonary metastasectomy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Over a half-century has passed since Thomford et al. proposed the selection criteria for pulmonary metastasectomy, and several prognostic factors have been identified. Although screening modalities and operations have changed dramatically, the important concepts of the selection criteria remain unchanged. Recent improvements in the survival outcomes of colorectal cancer patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy may be the result of strict adherence to the selection criteria for oligometastatic lung tumors, which can mimic local disease. Pulmonary metastasectomy has become an important option for selected patients with oligometastasis, based mainly on a large amount of retrospective data, but its effect on survival remains unclear. Curable pulmonary metastasis might be regarded as a "semi-local disease" under the spontaneous control of an acquired alteration in host immune status. The current practice of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer focuses on selecting the most appropriate operation for selected patients. However, in the rapidly evolving era of immunotherapy, treatment-naïve patients for whom surgery is not suitable might be pre-conditioned by immunotherapy so that they may be considered for salvage surgery.

Ongoing 5-year+ survival after multiple metastasectomies, followed by CAPOX plus bevacizumab, for metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Advancements in chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have improved long-term outcomes, and median survival currently exceeds 30 months. The recommended treatment for mCRC is multidisciplinary, including a combination of surgical resection and chemotherapy. In this study, we report the case of a patient who has survived for more than 5 years after an initial diagnosis of mCRC while undergoing first-line chemotherapy and six repeat metastasectomies.

Case presentation

A 55-year-old man was diagnosed at our hospital with sigmoid colon cancer and hepatic metastasis. We performed laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and hepatic segmentectomy (segment 5 [S5] and S8). After resecting the primary tumor and liver metastasis, other metastases were found. Together with perioperative chemotherapy (CAPOX + bevacizumab), we performed repeated metastasectomies for liver metastasis (S4 and S7), pulmonary S1 metastasis, aortic lymph node metastasis, and right adrenal metastasis. With six metastasectomies, the patient has survived for more than 5.5 years.

Conclusions

Multidisciplinary treatment extends survival and improves the quality of life in patients with mCRC. Planned surveillance after metastasectomy may also be necessary to promote the early detection of recurrence in these patients.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: size matters

PURPOSE

We analysed our initial experience with SBRT in liver metastasis from colorectal cancer at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January/2014 and December/2017, 22 patients with 31 LMCCR were treated. Local control (LC) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. We analysed potential prognostic factors for LC: sex, PTV size, number of LM and the radiation scheme.

RESULTS

Median age: 69 years. Prior chemotherapy or local liver treatments: 81.8% and 63.6% of patients, respectively. SBRT consisted of 3 × 20 Gy (42.9%) and 3 × 15 Gy (31.4%). There were 88.5% responses (57.1% CR and 31.4% PR). Median follow-up was 30 months. LC per lesion at 12 and 24 months was 85.3% and 61.8%, respectively. Tumour volumes > 30 cc correlated with worsened 2-year-control rates (90% vs 34.5%) (p = 0.005). There was only a patient with CTC-grade 3 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver SBRT is a safe and effective treatment that achieves high local control rates. We found a significant correlation between larger LMCRC and worse local control.

Management of isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence after surgery for colorectal cancer

Purpose

The rare incidence of isolated para-aortic lymph node (PALN) recurrence of colorectal cancer has precluded the formulation of treatment guidelines. This study evaluated and compared the effects of different treatment modalities on survival outcomes in patients with PALN recurrence.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with isolated PALN recurrence after curative resection for primary colorectal cancer from January 2004 to December 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with isolated recurrence were selected using imaging modalities. Overall survival (OS) and survival after recurrence (SAR) were analyzed and compared between different treatments using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

The median OS was 64 months with a median follow-up time of 50 months. Of the 46 patients with PALN recurrence, 35 (76.1%) had isolated recurrences. Of these 35 patients, 16 underwent PALN resection and 19 received chemotherapy. Median SAR was significantly longer in patients who did than did not undergo resection (71 months vs. 39 months, P = 0.017). Median OS tended to be longer in patients who did than did not undergo resection (77 months vs. 62 months, P = 0.055). SAR was similar in patients who received radiotherapy and those who underwent resection (34 months vs. 46 months, P = 0.146). Three of 16 patients (18.8%) who underwent resection were found to be recurrence-free.

Conclusion

Surgical resection of isolated PALN recurrence may benefit patients, with favorable survival outcomes and by providing definitive diagnosis for proper treatment planning.

Effect of PET-CT on disease recurrence and management in patients with potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Preoperative evaluation of resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases with positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) is used extensively. The PETCAM trial evaluated the effect of PET-CT (intervention) vs no PET-CT (control) on surgical management. PET-CT resulted in 8% change in surgical management, therefore, we aimed to compare long-term outcomes (disease-free [DFS], overall survival [OS]).

METHODS

Trial recruitment (2005-2010) had prospective follow-up until 2013. Events from 2013 to 2017 were collected retrospectively. Survival was described by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Oncologic risk factors were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Among 404 patients randomized, there were no differences in DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.43) or OS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.78-1.32) between groups. For all patients randomized, median DFS (PET-CT vs no PET-CT) was 16 months (95% CI, 13-18) and 15 months (95% CI, 11-22), P = .33. For patients who underwent liver resection (n = 368), DFS (17 vs 16 months, P = .51) and OS (58 months vs 52 months, P = .90) were similar between groups, respectively. Risk factors for DFS and OS were age, tumor size, node-positive disease, extrahepatic metastases and disease-free duration.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PET-CT changes surgical management in a small percentage of cases, without effect on recurrence rates or long-term survival.

Aggressive Multimodal Treatment and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Survival

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess patient and demographic factors, treatment trends, and survival outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer with metastasis to the liver, lung, or both sites. Differences remain among national guidelines about the optimal management strategy.

METHODS

Adults from the National Cancer Database (2010 to 2015) with a primary diagnosis of colorectal liver, lung, or liver and lung metastases were included and stratified by metastasis site. The primary end point was 5-year overall survival, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Among 82,609 included patients, 70.42% had liver, 8.74% had lung, and 20.85% had simultaneous liver and lung metastases. Treatment with chemotherapy alone was used the most (21.11%), followed by chemotherapy with colorectal radical resection (CRRR) (19.4%), no treatment (14.35%), CRRR alone (9.03%), and chemotherapy with CRRR and liver/lung resection (8.22%). Patients with lung metastasis had significantly better 5-year overall survival rates than the other 2 metastatic groups (15.99%, 16.70%, and 5.51%; p < 0.001), even after stratifying by treatment type and adjusting for other factors. Chemotherapy with CRRR and liver/lung resection was associated with the greatest reduction in mortality risk for all sites in both unadjusted (35.15%, 44.52%, and 20.10%; p < 0.001) and adjusted analyses (hazard ratio 0.42; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.47; p < 0.001; hazard ratio 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.53; p < 0.001; and hazard ratio 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.01; p = 0.064 for trend), and forgoing treatment or CRRR alone offered the worst overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastasis to lung had increased overall survival compared with other sites of metastases, regardless of treatment modality. Combined resection of primary tumor, metastasectomy, and chemotherapy appears to offer the greatest chance of survival.

Benefits of repeated resections for liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate oncological outcomes after repeat metastasectomies in patients having undergone previous resections for colorectal cancer metastases.

METHODS

We examined 248 patients who underwent metastasectomies for lung and/or liver metastases at our center during a 7-year period, from January 2005 to December 2011. Recurrence-free survival 1 (RFS1) after the metastasectomy for the initial recurrence, recurrence-free survival 2 (RFS2) after the second, and recurrence-free survival 3 (RFS3) after the third repeated resections for recurrence were assessed. The overall survival (OS) rate after the first metastasectomy for the first recurrence (OS) was also assessed.

RESULTS

Sites of recurrence of the first metastasectomy were the liver, lung, and liver and lung in 115, 117, and 16 cases, respectively, and 133 patients had a second recurrence (133/248, 53.6%). Twenty-seven patients had a third recurrence (27/52, 51.9%), of whom 14 underwent a third metastasectomy. The 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 74.8% and 57.9%, respectively. The 1-year RFS1, RFS2, and RFS3 rates were 76%, 75%, and 39%, respectively. The hazard ratios for RFS were 1.142 and 2.590 for the first and second repeat surgeries, when compared to the first metastasectomy. The third metastasectomy showed significantly lower RFS than did the second metastasectomy.

CONCLUSION

A second metastasectomy should be considered the optimal treatment for a second recurrence. However, careful considerations should be made before performing a third metastasectomy.

Local treatment of liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer: a multicenter Tunisian study

Aim: Surgical treatment of hepatic or pulmonary metastases is the optimal therapeutic goal in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Our retrospective study concerned 70 patients treated for CRC, collected from 2003 to 2015, presenting liver metastases (LM) in 61 cases and pulmonary metastases (PM) in nine cases, treated by surgery for their distant disease. We collected and compared their epidemiologic, anatomoclinical parameters and analyzed several prognostic factors. Results: Metastases were multiple (≥ 4) in 9/61 LM and in 5/9 PM. Patients had synchronous metastases in 32 cases (30 LM/2 PM) and metachronous metastases in 33 cases (32 LM and 11 PM). Surgery for LM consisted of metastasectomy (49/61), segmentectomy (5/61) and hepatectomy for the remaining seven patients; ten patients had also subsequent liver radiofrequency. LM were treated by wedge resection in 6/9 and lobectomy in two cases, radiofrequency was performed in five cases. 56/61 (80%) patients received chemotherapy, mostly FOLFOX protocol as the first-line treatment and targeted therapy in 55% of cases. For the overall population, median OS and PFS were, respectively, 44 and 32 months. We did not observe any significant difference in terms of OS (p = 0.659) and PFS (p = 0.318) between resected LM or/and PM. A better survival was found when there was disease-free interval between the occurrence of the primary and the metastases exceeded 18 months and in patients with less than four metastases. Conclusion: Resection of metastatic disease mostly in liver and lungs improves survival of patients with CRC. The patients with longer disease-free interval and less than four metastases had the best outcomes.

Repeating of local therapy of distant metastases increases overall survival in patients with synchronous metastasized rectal cancer-a monocentric analysis

PURPOSE

The aim was to evaluate the outcome of treatment-naive patients with synchronous metastatic rectal cancer after chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI followed by local therapeutic procedures of all tumor lesions as complete as possible.

METHODS

We reviewed data of 30 patients with synchronous distant metastatic rectal cancer who underwent chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI and subsequent local therapy in our institution.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 8; 74). Cumulative overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 93.3, 76.9, 55.6% and 46.2, 29.7, 29.7% after 1, 2, 4 years. Non-response to chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI was associated with a highly significant decreased OS (p < 0.0001). The consistent use of local ablative procedures led to a statistically significant increase in OS (p < 0.0001), but not in PFS (p = 0.635). Patients with ≤ 4 distant metastases showed a better OS (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Response to intensified first-line chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI, treatment of the primary rectal tumor, and repeated thorough local ablative procedures in patients with synchronous metastasized rectal cancer may lead to long-term survival, even in a subset of patients with unresectable disease at initial diagnosis.

Long-term Survival after Repeated Local Therapy and Salvage Chemotherapy for Recurrent Metastases from Gastric Cancer: a Case Report and Literature Review

We report a rare case of long-term survival in a patient who received local therapy and salvage chemotherapy for recurrent metastases, along with a literature review. A 65-year-old male patient underwent subtotal gastrectomy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Six months after gastrectomy, 2 metastatic intra-abdominal lymph node enlargements were detected, which were treated with radiotherapy. At 55 months after gastrectomy, an abdominal wall mass was detected, which was treated by surgical resection. The patient received 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan chemotherapy for 27 months before and after radiotherapy and docetaxel chemotherapy for 6 months after surgical resection of the abdominal wall metastasis. At the last visit, 7.8 years since the initial resection of the primary gastric cancer and 6.2 years since detection of the first metastases, the patient was disease-free and required no further chemotherapy. This case suggests that repeated local therapy offers potential for long-term survival in a carefully selected subset of patients with recurrent metastases.

Recurrence patterns after laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The major issue after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is the high incidence of recurrence. Unlike open liver resection (OLR), recurrence following laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is not well documented. The aim of this study was to analyze recurrence patterns and treatment following LLR for CRLM.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients who underwent LLR for CRLM from 2000 to 2016 were reviewed. Patients who presented with recurrence were compared to those who did not. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and risk of recurrence and survival prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 273 patients were included, of which 157 (57.5%) were treated for one liver metastasis (LM). Median follow-up was 41 (12-187) months and associated extrahepatic disease was present in 27% of patients (mainly pulmonary, 65%). After a median of 16 (3-151) months, 197 (72%) patients presented with recurrence. Recurrences were early (< 6 months) in 22.8% of cases, occured in a single site in 66% and were intrahepatic, extrahepatic, or both in 44, 30, and 26%, respectively. Recurrences were treated with surgery or chemotherapy only in 45 and 47%, respectively. 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS was 82, 71, and 43%, respectively. Independent risk factors for recurrence were node-positive primary tumor, extrahepatic disease before hepatectomy, and R1 resection.

CONCLUSION

LLR for CRLM does not seem to be associated with distinctive recurrence patterns. LLR for CRLM yielded satisfying RFS and OS and should therefore be considered whenever possible.

Recent advances in treatment for colorectal liver metastasis

A major challenge for the management of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is the multidisciplinary approach including surgery. Resection is the most important treatment strategy to prolong the survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Even when resection is not possible as a primary treatment, it may still be carried out for curative intent after effective chemotherapy. Therefore, resection should always be considered when conducting chemotherapy for CRLM. Neoadjuvant anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody has shown a high response rate for RAS wild CRC. However, whether anti-EGFR antibody is superior to antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody for all types of CRLM is yet to be determined. Recently, several randomized control trials of first-line therapy for advanced CRC have been conducted, and some of them are ongoing. The optimal chemotherapy regimen and tumor biology indicated for neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as conversion surgery are expected to be determined in the near future.

The New Era of Transplant Oncology: Liver Transplantation for Nonresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most incident cancer worldwide. Most of CRC patients will develop distant metastases, mainly to the liver, and liver resection is the only potential chance for cure. On the other hand, only a small proportion of patients with hepatic CRC metastasis are candidates for upfront liver resection. Liver transplantation (LT) is an attractive option for patients with nonresectable CRC liver metastases (NRCLM) without extrahepatic involvement. Initial experiences with LT for NRCLM achieved very poor outcomes, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) lower than 20%. However, these initial studies did not have a standardized patient selection or neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies. With recent advances in the surgical and medical oncology fields, the landscape has changed. Recent studies from Norway have shown an encouraging 5-year OS of 50% when transplanting patients with NRCLM. Nevertheless, the main concern when expanding the indications for LT is organ shortage. To manage this organ shortage, strategies utilizing live donor liver transplantation are gaining favor. A few ongoing trials are assessing the impact of LT in NRCLM patient survival. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to review the current status of LT for NRCLM.