CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer

Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Minimally invasive locoregional therapies have a growing role in the multidisciplinary treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer. Factors contributing to the expanding role of ablation for primary breast cancer include earlier diagnosis, when tumors are small, and increased longevity of patients whose condition precludes surgery. Cryoablation has emerged as the leading ablative modality for primary breast cancer owing to its wide availability, the lack of need for sedation, and the ability to monitor the ablation zone. Emerging evidence suggests that in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, use of locoregional therapies to eradicate all disease sites may confer a survival advantage. Evidence also suggests that transarterial therapies-including chemoembolization, chemoperfusion, and radioembolization-may be helpful to some patients with advanced liver metastases from breast cancer, such as those with hepatic oligoprogression or those who cannot tolerate systemic therapy. However, the optimal modalities for treatment of oligometastatic and advanced metastatic disease remain unknown. Finally, locoregional therapies may produce tumor antigens that in combination with immunotherapy drive anti-tumor immunity. Although key trials are ongoing, additional prospective studies are needed to establish the inclusion of interventional oncology in societal breast cancer guidelines to support further clinical adoption and improved patient outcomes.

Percutaneous image-guided ablation for hepatic metastases

The presence of hepatic metastases indicates advanced disease and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially when the hepatic disease is not amenable to locoregional treatments. The primary tumour of origin, the distribution and extent of metastatic disease, the underlying liver reserve, the patient performance status and the presence of comorbidities are factors that determine whether a patient will benefit from hepatectomy or local curative-intent treatments. For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, the most common primary cancer that spreads to the liver, several studies have demonstrated a survival benefit for patients who can be treated with hepatectomy and/or percutaneous ablation, compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone. Despite advances in surgical techniques increasing the percentage of patients eligible for surgery, most patients have unresectable disease or are poor surgical candidates. Percutaneous ablation can be used to provide local disease control and prolong survival for both surgical and non-surgical candidates. This is typically offered to patients with small hepatic metastases that can be ablated with optimal (≥10 mm) or at least adequate minimum ablation margins (≥5 mm), as high local tumour control rates can be achieved for these patients which are comparable to surgical resection. This review summarizes available evidence and outcomes following percutaneous ablation of the most frequently encountered types of hepatic metastases in the clinical practice of interventional oncology. Patient selection, technical considerations, follow-up protocols and oncologic outcomes are presented and discussed.

Breast cancer liver metastases: systematic review and time to event meta-analysis with comparison between available treatments

INTRODUCTION

The current gold standard treatment for breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) is systemic chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy. Nonetheless, greater consideration has been given to local therapeutic strategies in recent years. We sought to compare survival outcomes for available systemic and local treatments for BCLM, specifically surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation.

METHODS

A review of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. Data from included studies were extracted and subjected to time-to-event data synthesis, algorithmically reconstructing individual patient-level data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

FINDINGS

A total of 54 studies were included, comprising data for 5,430 patients (surgery, n=2,063; ablation, n=305; chemotherapy, n=3,062). Analysis of the reconstructed data demonstrated survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years of 90%, 65.9% and 53%, respectively, for the surgical group, 83%, 49% and 35% for the ablation group and 53%, 24% and 14% for the chemotherapy group (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Local therapeutic interventions such as liver resection and radiofrequency ablation are effective treatments for BCLM, particularly in patients with metastatic disease localised to the liver. Although the data from this review support surgical resection for BCLM, further prospective studies for managing oligometastatic breast cancer disease are required.

Role of interventional oncology for treatment of liver metastases: evidence based best practice

The presence of liver metastases is associated with a poor prognosis in many cancer diseases. Multiple studies during the last decades aimed to find out the best multimodal therapy to achieve an ideal, safe and highly effective treatment. In addition to established therapies such as systemic therapy, surgery and radiation therapy, interventional oncology with thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolisation and radioembolisation, is becoming the fourth pillar of cancer therapies and is part of a personalised treatments' strategy. This review informs about the most popular currently performed interventional oncological treatments in patients with liver metastases.

Interventional oncology update

Interventional Oncology (IO) is a subspecialty field of Interventional Radiology bridging between diagnostic radiology and the clinical oncology team, addressing the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. There have been many exciting advancements in the field of IO in recent years; far too many to cover in a single paper. To give each topic sufficient attention, we have limited the scope of this review article to four topics which we feel have the potential to drastically change how cancer is treated managed in the immediate future.

CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads transarterial-chemoembolization in the treatment of liver metastases from breast cancer: Initial experience in 14 patients

Breast cancer patients with liver metastases are associated with high mortality. However, no standardized treatment approach is available for these patients who have undergone chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) who underwent drug-eluting beads used for transarterial-chemoembolization (DEB-TACE).We retrospectively enrolled 14 patients with 39 lesions who underwent DEB-TACE for liver metastases following mastectomy for primary breast cancer. The incidence of complications, overall survival (OS), and local tumor progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed.A total of 14 patients with 39 liver metastases were treated with DEB-TACE from July 2017 to July 2020. The objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 71.4% and 92.8% at the 3-month period and 50% and 71.4% at the 6-month period, respectively. During the follow-up period the local tumor PFS was 8.0 months. The median OS was 20.0 months (range, 8-40 months) and the 1-, 2-year OS rates were 84.4% and 47.4%, respectively. No severe complications caused by this technique were detected.DEB-TACE for BCLM was characterized as a low trauma technique, with a limited number of complications. The results indicated that this method was safe and effective for patients with BCLM and could be widely adopted as a palliative treatment in clinical practice.

Clinical Effectiveness of Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy for Liver Metastasis From Breast Cancer

Background

Few studies of proton beam therapy (PBT) for patients with liver metastasis from breast cancer (LMBC) are available to date. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of PBT for patients with LMBC.

Material and Methods

Seventeen patients with LMBC treated with PBT were included in this study. The median prescribed dose of PBT was 66 GyE (range, 60-80) in 10 fractions, 5 times a week. In patients with LMBC receiving PBT, freedom from local progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were assessed.

Results

The median follow-up time was 34.2 months (range, 11.5-56.1). The median FFLP time was not yet reached, and the 3-year FFLP rates were 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.9-105.3). The median times of PFS and OS were 7.9 months (95% CI, 5.3-10.5) and 39.3 months (95% CI, 33.2-51.9), respectively, and the 3-year PFS and OS rates were 19.6% (95% CI, -1.8-41.0) and 71.7% (95% CI, 46.8-96.6), respectively. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were not observed.

Conclusion

PBT for patients with LMBC showed promising FFLP and OS with safe toxicity profiles. These findings suggest that PBT can be considered a local treatment option in patients with LMBC.

Significance of liver metastasis volume in breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study analyzed the impact of liver metastasis (LM) volume on treatment outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

This single-institution retrospective analysis included 40 oligometastatic (≤ 5 metastases) BC patients with 58 liver metastases treated with SBRT between April 2013 and March 2021. The prognostic factors for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 28.1 months. Isolated and solitary LM were seen in 26 (65%) and 24 (60%) patients, respectively. Median time to disease recurrence was 10.7 months post liver SBRT. The 2‑year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 71.4%, 27.5%, and 86.8%, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with a gross tumor volume (GTV) of ≤ 6 cc and a planning target volume (PTV) of ≤ 38 cc demonstrated a significantly better median OS than those with GTV > 6 cc and PTV > 38 cc. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors for worse OS were GTV > 6 cc (HR = 3.07 [95% CI, 1.14-8.22; p = 0.03]) and PTV > 38 cc (HR = 5.91 [95% CI, 1.92-18.21; p = 0.002]). No significant factor for PFS was found. Only 2 patients experienced rib fracture at 4 and 6 months post treatment, and 1 patient had a grade II duodenal ulcer.

CONCLUSION

Liver SBRT is an effective and safe treatment option for oligometastatic BC patients with excellent LC, promising survival, and limited toxicity. Patients with smaller tumors displayed better OS than their counterparts, validating the effectiveness of a local treatment for this group.

Characteristic changes of the ablation zone on contrast-enhanced computed tomography after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases

Purpose:

Size and density measurements of the ablation zones on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic metastases of primary breast or colorectal cancer were acquired over time.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty-five liver metastases [colorectal cancer (CRC): n = 16; mean size: 19.6 ± 8.5 mm; breast cancer (BC): n = 9; 27.9 ± 13.6 mm] in 15 patients (CRC: n = 11; age: 65.4 ± 6.5 years; BC: n = 4; 62.0 ± 13.8 years) treated by RFA were included in this retrospective study. All patients had undergone postinterventional serial follow-up using multidetector CT (MDCT) (1 day/1/4/7/10/14/18/23/>24 months) without evidence of local tumor recurrence during the follow-up. The ablation zones were evaluated using a commercial software tool (Syngo CT Oncology) in order to determine volumetric, RECIST-, WHO- and density changes over the course of time. Results were compared by applying repeated measures analysis of variance and displayed graphically.

Results:

The RF ablation zones demonstrated significant shrinkage (P ≤ 0.05) over the first 7 months (volume, RECIST, WHO) of the follow-up. Follow-up after 7 months did not show any significant changes in size (P > 0.05) (mean volume (ml): 55.2/34.7/26.3/16.5/12.7/10.0/8.9/8.1/7.5; RECIST (mm): 58.7/49.3/43.7/37.8/34.2/31.3/29.1/27.3/24.8; WHO (mm²): 2458.3/1769.3/1341.8/1027.1/870.1/720.2/649.0/570.4/511.3). Mean density values decreased significantly between 1 day (58.9 HU) and 1 month (47.5 HU) after the procedure.

Conclusion:

Typical changes in size and density values of RF-induced, recurrence-free ablation zones after RFA of hepatic metastases of colorectal and breast cancer were acquired, showing a significant decrease in density of the ablation zone within the first month and significant shrinkage within the first 7 months after RFA.

Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation of Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Short- and Long-Term Results with Predicting Factors for Survival

Purpose

To evaluate safety, local oncological control, long-term outcome and potential prognostic factors of stereotactic RFA (SRFA) for the treatment of BCLMs.

Methods

Between July 2003 and December 2019, 42 consecutive female patients with median age 54.0 years were treated with SRFA at our institution for 110 BCLMs in 48 ablation sessions. Median tumor size was 3.0 cm (0.8–9.0). Eighteen (42.9%) patients had extrahepatic metastasis at initial SRFA.

Results

Technical success rate was 100%, i.e., all coaxial needles were inserted with appropriate accuracy within 10 mm off plan and 107/110 (92.3%) BCLMs were successfully ablated at initial SRFA. Four Grade 1 (8.3%, 4/48) and one Grade 2 (2.1%, 1/48) complications occurred. No perioperative deaths occurred. Local recurrence developed in 8 of 110 tumors (7.3%). Overall survival (OS) rates of all patients at 1, 3, and 5 years from the date of the first SRFA were 84.1%, 49.3%, and 20.8% with a median OS of 32.3 months. Univariable cox regression analyses revealed age > 60 years and extrahepatic disease (without bone only metastases) as significant predictors of worse OS (p = 0.013 and 0.025, respectively). Size and number of metastases, hormone receptor status and time onset did not significantly affect OS after initial SRFA.

Conclusions

SRFA is a safe, minimally invasive treatment option in the management of BCLMs, especially in younger patients without advanced extrahepatic metastasis, including those with large liver tumors.

Hepatic Metastasis from Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and breast cancer liver metastasis may be associated with poor outcomes. Emerging locoregional therapies can be given in outpatient settings or with short hospital stays, to provide local control, support quality of life, preserve liver function, and potentially prolong survival. This review discusses retrospective studies suggesting potential benefits of locoregional treatment of breast cancer liver metastasis. Future prospective studies are needed to demonstrate efficacy and optimize patient selection.

Surgical therapy for breast cancer liver metastases

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in females worldwide. If diagnosed early, patients generally have good outcomes. However, approximately 20% to 30% of all women diagnosed with breast cancer develop metastatic disease. Metastatic breast cancer is incurable, but there is growing evidence that resection or other local therapy for breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) may improve survival. We aimed to review indications for and outcomes of perioperative liver resection and other local therapies for BCLM. In this series, we reviewed 11 articles (605 patients) focusing on surgical resection and 7 articles (266 patients) describing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for BCLM. Median disease-free survival (DFS) after surgical resection was 23 months (range, 14–29 months) and median overall survival (OS) was 39.5 months (range, 26–82 months). One, 3- and 5-year survivals were 89.5%, 70%, and 38%, respectively. The factors favoring better outcomes are hormone receptor positive primary breast cancer status, R0 resection, no extrahepatic metastases (EHM), small BCLM, and solitary liver metastases. On the other hand, the median DFS with RFA was 11 months, median OS was 32 months, and the 3- and 5-year OS were 43% and 27%, respectively. The clinical features that are indications for RFA are smaller tumor and higher EHM rate than those favoring surgical resection (2.4 vs. 4.0 cm and 46% vs. 27%). The merits of RFA are its high technical success rate, low morbidity, short hospital stay, and that it can be repeated. Although results are as yet limited, in carefully selected patients, resection or other local therapies such as RFA, render BCLM potentially provide prognostic improvement.

Quality of life analysis after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) of liver tumors and identify variables associated with decreased HRQoL and to compare it to other treatments in case of concurrency. From 2011 to 2017 577 patients underwent SRFA for liver tumors in 892 ablation sessions. 303 (52.5%) patients completed a HRQoL questionnaire once after the ablation. HRQoL was assessed by the Short Form (SF)-12 health survey with mental and physical component scales and by a general questionnaire to assess disease and treatment-specific items as well as to compare tolerability of SRFA to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic resection (HR) and chemotherapy (CTX). The median SF-12 PCS was 46.6 and MCS was 53.2. Patients experiencing pain or complications and patients refusing repeat SRFA showed significantly lower PCS (43.2 vs 48.6, p = 0.0003; 32.8 vs 46.9, p = 0.005 and 40.6 vs 46.9, p = 0.009). 355 (97.8%) patients indicated willingness to undergo repeat SRFA with little to no fear in 292 (80.7%) patients. Among patients with multiple therapies, SRFA was rated by 40 (90.9%) as preferred re-treatment, HR by 1 (2.3%) and CTX by 3 (6.8%). In conclusion, we have shown that SRFA has good HRQoL-outcomes and reported low morbidity rates. Consequently the vast majority of study patients would accept a repeated SRFA if necessary (97.8%), without fear (80.7%). SRFA was preferred among patients who experienced concurrent treatments, such as HR or CTX.

Predictors of Progression-Free Survival and Local Tumor Control after Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

To describe ablation of bone, liver, lung, and soft tissue tumors from oligometastatic breast cancer and to define predictors of local progression and progression-free survival (PFS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 33 women (mean age 52 ± 12 years old; range, 28-69 years), underwent 46 thermal ablations of liver (n = 35), lung (n = 7), and bone/soft tissue (n = 4) metastases. Mean tumor diameter was 18 ± 15 mm (range, 6-50 mm). Ablations were performed to eradicate all evident sites of disease (n = 24) or to control growing sites in the setting of other stable or responding sites of disease (n = 22). Patient characteristics, ablation margins, imaging responses, and cases of PFS were assessed. Follow-up imaging was performed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, or positron-emission tomography/ CT.

RESULTS

Median PFS was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 -14.5 months), and time to local progression was 11 months (95% CI, 5-16 months). Eight patients (24%) maintained no evidence of disease during a median follow-up period of 39 months. Ablation margin ≥5 mm was associated with no local tumor progression. Longer PFS was noted in estrogen receptor-positive patients (12 vs 4 months; P = .037) and younger patients (12 vs 4 months; P = .039) treated to eradicate all sites of disease (13 vs 5 months; P = .05). Eighteen patients (55%) developed new metastases during study follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermal ablation of oligometastatic pulmonary, hepatic, bone, and soft tissue tumors can eliminate local tumor progression if margins are ≥5 mm. Longer PFS was observed in patients who were estrogen receptor-positive and patients who were younger and in whom all sites of disease were eradicated.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumours

This CIRSE Standards of Practice document reviews current literature and provides best practices for image guided thermal ablation of liver tumours, including radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation techniques.

Local Treatment of Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis

Breast cancer represents a leading cause of death worldwide. Despite the advances in systemic therapies, the prognosis for patients with breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) remains poor. Especially in case of failure or cessation of systemic treatments, surgical resection for BCLMs has been considered as the treatment standard despite a lack of robust evidence of benefit. However, due to the extent and location of disease and physical condition, the number of patients with BCLM who are eligible for surgery is limited. Palliative locoregional treatments of liver metastases (LM) include transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Percutaneous thermal ablation methods, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), are considered potentially curative local treatment options. They are less invasive, less expensive and have fewer contraindications and complication rates than surgery. Because conventional ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided single-probe thermal ablation is limited by tumor size, multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) with intraoperative image fusion for immediate, reliable judgment has been developed in order to treat large and multiple tumors within one session. This review focuses on the different minimally invasive local and locoregional treatment options for BCLM and attempts to describe their current and future role in the multidisciplinary treatment setting.

Local treatment of oligometastatic disease: current role

The presence of distant metastases has long been a predictor of poor outcome in solid cancer. However, in an oncologic situation called oligometastatic disease (OMD), multiple studies have revealed a survival benefit with aggressive treatment of these metastases. Besides surgery and radiation therapy, local thermal therapies have developed into a treatment option for OMD. Most studies concerning local therapy of OMD are available for colorectal cancer, which is therefore the focus of this article. Furthermore, this review gives a basic overview of the most popular ablation techniques for treatment of OMD.

Long-term outcomes and prognostic analysis of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in liver metastasis from breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and prognostic factors of ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM).

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2015, 69 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous RFA for BCLM and had regular follow-up examinations were included. All patients had undergone resection of the primary breast cancer and had received chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or both after surgery. The sample included two males and 67 females with an average age of 50.3 ± 10.0 years (31-76 y). The mean maximum diameter of metastatic lesions in the liver was 2.9 ± 1.4 cm (1.0-6 cm). Thirty-five patients had a single metastasis, while 34 patients had multiple liver metastases (2-5 lesions). Survival results were generated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

In total, 92 RFA sessions were performed and 135 BCLM lesions were treated. Major complications occurred in one of the 92 sessions (1.1%). Technical efficacy was achieved in 92.6% of lesions (125/135 lesions). Local tumor progression occurred in 11.6% (8/69) of patients and new intrahepatic metastasis occurred in 55.1% (38/69) of patients. From the time of initial RFA, the median overall survival was 26 months, and the one-, two-, three- and five -year survival rates were 81.8, 50.1, 25.3 and 11.0%, respectively. Based on the multivariate analysis, the following three factors were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival: tumor size (p = .017), positive estrogen receptor status (p = .009) and extrahepatic metastatic disease (p = .001). The median progression-free survival was 24 months, and the one-, two-, three- and five -year survival rates after RFA were 77.4, 47.0, 23.7 and 8.5%, respectively. Additionally, the independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival included tumor size (p = .011), ER positivity (p = .001), margin size (p = .017) and extrahepatic metastatic disease (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that RFA is a safe and locally effective method for the treatment of BCLM, especially in patients with lesions measuring less than 3 cm in diameter, a single liver metastasis, positive estrogen receptor status and no extrahepatic metastases. Also, patients with margin size >10 mm had no local tumor progression.

Locoregional Therapies for the Treatment of Hepatic Metastases from Breast and Gynecologic Cancers

Breast cancer is the most common women's malignancy in the United States and is the second leading cause of cancer death. More than half of patients with breast cancer will develop hepatic metastases; this portends a poorer prognosis. In the appropriately selected patient, there does appear to be a role for curative (surgery, ablation) or palliative (intra-arterial treatments) locoregional therapy. Gynecologic malignancies are less common and metastases to the liver are most often seen in the setting of disseminated disease. The role of locoregional therapies in these patients is not well reported. The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes data of locoregional therapies in the treatment of hepatic metastases from breast and gynecologic malignancies.

Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes in patients with liver metastases from breast cancer treated with stereotactic radiofrequency (RF) ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 29 stereotactic RF ablation treatment sessions in 26 consecutive patients with 64 biopsy-proven breast cancer liver metastases (BCLMs) was conducted. Patients were included only if systemic treatment failed and all visible BCLMs were treatable.

RESULTS

Primary and secondary technical success rates were 96.9% (62 of 64) and 100%, respectively. There were no perioperative mortalities. Local recurrence was identified in 5 tumors (7.8%), with no significant differences among tumor sizes (P = .662): < 3 cm (9.3%), 3-5 cm (0%), and > 5 cm (8.3%). Median estimated overall survival (OS) from first stereotactic ablation treatment was 29.3 months ± 8.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9-46.8 mo; mean, 28.7 mo) after a median follow-up of 23.1 months (mean, 31.3 mo; range, 0.1-100.8 mo). No significant differences in OS (P = .223) were observed among tumor volumes < 50 cm³ (median, 84.9 mo ± 53.1; mean, 58.4 mo), 50-100 cm³ (median, 37.8 mo ± 5.7; mean, 36.3 mo), and > 100 cm³ (median, 17.1 mo ± 3.5; mean, 21.8 mo). Numbers of metastases did not affect estimated OS, with a median OS of 32.7 months ± 10.4 (mean, 35.8 mo) for single lesions vs 17.7 months ± 3.2 (mean, 25.9 mo) for 2/3 lesions and a mean of 68.4 months ± 17.23 for > 3 lesions (P = .113).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple-electrode stereotactic RF ablation proved to be a safe minimally invasive alternative to surgical liver resection in selected patients with BCLMs.

Hepatic Resection or Ablation for Isolated Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Case-control Study With Comparison to Medically Treated Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment for patients with isolated breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM).

BACKGROUND

Single-arm retrospective studies have shown promising results associated with surgery for isolated BCLM; however, this treatment remains controversial and its role is not well-defined.

METHODS

A review of 2150 patients with BCLM who underwent treatment in a single institution was conducted, and 167 (8%) patients with isolated BCLM were identified. A case-control study was conducted to compare outcomes in patients with isolated BCLM who underwent surgery and/or ablation to patients who underwent conventional medical therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 167 patients were included (surgery/ablation: 69; medical: 98), with a median follow-up for survivors of 73 months. Patients in the surgical cohort more frequently had estrogen receptor-positive tumors and received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for their primary breast tumor. The hepatic tumor burden was less and the interval from breast cancer diagnosis to BCLM was significantly longer (53 vs 30 months) in the surgical cohort. Patients undergoing surgical treatment had a median recurrence-free interval of 28.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 19-38) with 10 patients (15%) recurrence free after 5 years. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the surgical and medical cohorts (median OS: 50 vs 45 months; 5-year OS: 38% vs 39%).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic resection and/or ablation was not associated with a survival advantage. However, significant recurrence-free intervals can be accomplished with surgical treatment. Surgical intervention might be considered in highly selected patients with the goal of providing time off of systemic chemotherapy.

Metastatic Liver Disease: Indications for Locoregional Therapy and Supporting Data

Metastatic liver disease is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Surgical resection is considered the only curative treatment, yet only a minority is eligible. Patients who present with unresectable disease are treated with systemic agents and/or locoregional therapies. The latter include thermal ablation and catheter-based transarterial interventions. Thermal ablation is reserved for those with limited tumor burden. It is used to downstage the disease to enable curative surgical resection, as an adjunct to surgery, or in select patients it is potentially curative. Transarterial therapies are indicated in those with more diffuse disease. The goals of care are to palliate symptoms and prolong survival. The indications and supporting data for thermal ablation and transarterial interventions are reviewed, technical and tumor factors that need to be considered prior to intervention are outlined, and finally several cases are presented.

乳腺癌肝转移治疗现状及射频消融的应用及前景

乳腺癌是女性发病率和死亡率最高的恶性肿瘤. 乳腺癌晚期常发生转移, 好发转移部位依次为骨、肺、肝等. 近年来, 虽然乳腺癌肝转移(breast cancer liver metastases, BCLM)治疗成功率逐渐提高, 但是BCLM的预后仍然较差. 目前, BCLM的治疗方式尚未成熟, 主要以手术切除、化疗、射频消融(radiofrequency ablation, RFA)治疗、肝动脉栓塞灌注化疗等为主. 本文回顾分析了国内外有关治疗BCLM治疗的文献, 其中重点关注BCLM局部治疗中的RFA治疗, 分析RFA治疗BCLM的应用及前景.

Hepatic Tumor Ablation

Tumor ablation is a safe and effective treatment available in the multidisciplinary care of the surgical oncology patient. The role of ablation is well established in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and is becoming more accepted in the treatment of various malignancies metastatic to the liver, in particular colorectal cancer. Understanding the underlying technology, achieving appropriate applicator placement, using maximum energy delivery to create margins, and performing necessary adjunctive maneuvers are all required for successful tumor ablation.

Surgery for liver metastases from breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Liver metastases from breast cancer (BCLM) confer poor survival. Liver resection in BCLM patients has been increasingly employed.

AIM

We undertook a systematic review to evaluate the role of hepatic resection in patients with breast cancer metastatic to the liver.

MATERIALS & METHODS

In total, 36 studies were overviewed. Patient populations, characteristics, morbidity, mortality and survival were documented.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 41 months. Major morbidity was rare while 30-day postoperative mortality was near nil.

CONCLUSION

Liver surgery for BCLM can be performed with low mortality, acceptable morbidity and promising survival benefit in carefully selected patients.

Proton beam therapy for metastatic liver tumors

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the treatment of metastatic liver tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 140 patients with liver metastasis who received PBT were retrospectively investigated. The main primary tumor sites were the colorectum (60) and the pancreas (19).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three patients (95%) completed treatment. Two patients experienced late adverse effects (rib fracture and cholangitis). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 24%. In the 85 patients with lesions confined to the liver, the 5-year OS rate of was 28%, and in the 55 patients with lesions both inside and outside the liver, it was 16% (P=0.007). Among the patients with lesions confined to the liver, the 5-year OS rate of the 62 patients who received curative treatment was 30%, and that of the 23 patients who received palliative treatment, 23% (P=0.016). Multivariate analysis showed that the treatment strategy (curative and palliative) alone was associated with the OS rate (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

PBT is a potentially safe and effective treatment for metastatic liver tumors.

Locally ablative treatment of breast cancer liver metastases: identification of factors influencing survival (the Mammary Cancer Microtherapy and Interventional Approaches (MAMMA MIA) study)

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases from breast cancer (LMBC) are typically considered to indicate systemic disease spread and patients are most often offered systemic palliative treatment only. However, retrospective studies suggest that some patients may have improved survival with local treatment of their liver metastases compared to systemic therapy alone. In the absence of randomized trials, it is important to identify patient characteristics indicating that benefit from local treatment can be expected.

METHODS

59 patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA), interstitial brachytherapy (BT), or radioembolization (RE) of LMBC as a salvage treatment were studied. Potential factors influencing survival were analyzed in a multivariate Cox model. For factors identified to have an independent survival impact, Kaplan-Meier analysis and comparison of overall survival (OS) using the log-rank test was performed.

RESULTS

Median OS following local interventional treatment was 21.9 months. Considering only factors evaluable at treatment initiation, maximum diameter of liver metastases (≥3.9 cm; HR: 3.1), liver volume (≥ 1376 mL; HR: 2.3), and history of prior chemotherapy (≥ 3 lines of treatment; HR: 2.5-2.6) showed an independent survival impact. When follow-up data were included in the analysis, significant factors were maximum diameter of liver metastases (≥ 3.9 cm; HR: 3.1), control of LMBC during follow-up (HR: 0.29), and objective response as best overall response (HR: 0.21). Neither the presence of any extrahepatic metastases nor presence of bone metastases only had a significant survival impact. Median OS was 38.7 vs. 16.1 months in patients with metastases < vs. ≥ 3.9 cm, 36.6 vs. 10.2 months for patients having objective response vs. stable/progressive disease, and 38.5 vs. 14.2 months for patients having controlled vs. non-controlled disease at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Local control of LMBC confers a survival benefit and local interventional treatment for LMBC should be studied in a randomized trial. Patients with small metastases and limited history of systemic LMBC treatment are most likely to benefit from local approaches. Limited extrahepatic disease should not lead to exclusion from a randomized study and should not be a contraindication for local LMBC treatment as long as no randomized data are available.

Flat-panel cone-beam CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of very small (≤ 1.5 cm) liver tumors: technical note on a preliminary experience

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the technical feasibility of flat-panel cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of very small (<1.5 cm) liver tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients included were candidates for hepatic percutaneous RFA as they had single biopsy-proven hepatic tumors sized ≤ 1.5 cm and poorly defined on ultrasonography. Following apnea induction, unenhanced CBCT scans were acquired and used to deploy the RF electrode with the aid of a virtual navigation system. If the tumor was not clearly identified on the unenhanced CBCT scan, a right retrograde arterial femoral access was established to carry out hepatic angiography and localize the tumor. Patients' lesions and procedural variables were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Three patients (2 male and 1 female), aged 68, 76, and 87 years were included; 3 lesions (2 hepato-cellular carcinoma and 1 metastasis from colorectal cancer) were treated. One patient required hepatic angiography. Cycles of apnea used to acquire CBCT images and to deploy the electrode lasted <120 s. Mean fluoroscopic time needed to deploy the electrode was 36.6 ± 5.7 min. Mean overall procedural time was 66.0 ± 22.9 min. No peri- or post-procedural complications were noted. No cases of incomplete ablation were noted at 1-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous CBCT-guided liver RFA with or without arterial hepatic angiography is technically feasible.

Yttrium-90 radioembolization stops progression of targeted breast cancer liver metastases after failed chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine, in an open-label, retrospective report, the safety and effectiveness of locoregional therapy with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization for patients with progressing breast cancer liver metastases (BCLMs) despite multi-agent chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five patients with progressing BCLMs and stable extrahepatic disease were treated with radioembolization at a single institution. Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed to evaluate clinical and biochemical toxicities, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and time to progression. Radiologic response assessments included Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors in primary index lesions and metabolic activity on positron emission tomography (PET). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The mortality rate at 30 days was 4% (n = 3). Clinical toxicity and hyperbilirubinemia of grade 3 or worse occurred in 7.6% (n = 5) and 5.9% of patients (n = 4), respectively. Partial response (PR) was seen in 35.3% of patients (n = 24), stable disease (SD) in 63.2% (n = 43), and progressive disease in 1.5% (n = 1). PET imaging was available in 25 patients, and 21 (84%) had a complete response, PR, or SD. The median OS was 6.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-9.2 mo). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS on multivariate analysis was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.23-0.66) for tumor burden less than 25% compared with greater burden. Elevated bilirubin levels were shown to reduce OS. The HR for hepatic progression was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.05-0.98) for solitary versus multifocal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Locoregional therapy with (90)Y radioembolization is safe and stops or delays the progression of targeted chemorefractory BCLMs. Adverse prognosticators were identified.

"How we do it" - a practical approach to hepatic metastases ablation techniques

Secondary liver malignancies are associated with significant mortality and morbidity if left untreated. Colorectal cancer is the most frequent origin of hepatic metastases. A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of hepatic metastases includes medical, surgical, radiation and interventional oncology. The role of interventional oncology in the management of hepatic malignancies continues to evolve and applies to a large and continuous spectrum of metastatic disease, from the relatively small solitary metastasis to larger tumors and multifocal liver disease. Within the past 10 years, several publications of percutaneous image-guided ablation indicated the effectiveness and safety of this minimally invasive therapy for selected patients with limited number (arguably up to 4 metastases) of relatively small (less than 5cm) hepatic metastases. Different image-guided procedures such radiofrequency, microwave, and laser cause thermal ablation and coagulation necrosis or cell death of the target tumor. Cryoablation, causing cell death via cellular freezing, has also been used. Recently, irreversible electroporation, a nonthermal modality, has also been used for liver tumor ablation. In the following section, we review the different liver ablation techniques, as well as indications for ablation, specific patient preparations, and different "tricks of the trade" that we use to achieve safe and effective liver tumor ablation. We also discuss appropriate imaging and clinical patient follow-up and potential complications of liver tumor ablation.

Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) of hepatic metastases (METS) from breast cancer (BC): an adjunctive tool in the multimodal treatment of advanced disease

PURPOSE

The study was done to analyse the results of a series of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures performed on hepatic metastases (METS) from breast cancer in order to evaluate the clinical impact of this therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed 45 patients (mean age 55 years) with 87 METS (mean size 23 mm), in terms of adverse events (AE), complete ablation (CA) at initial follow-up assessment and during the subsequent follow-up (mean 30 months), time to progression, and survival. The correlation between local effectiveness and METS size was investigated. Possible predictors of 3-year survival, including the local effectiveness of RFA (complete ablation maintained at 1-year versus treatment failure) were analysed.

RESULTS

Nine AE occurred (two major complications, 2.3 %). CA at initial follow-up was obtained in 90 %; 19.7 % CA relapsed, with a time to progression of 8 months. The difference between the mean diameter of maintained CA (22 mm) and that of the treatment failures (30 mm) was highly significant (p = 0.0005), as was the 30 mm threshold (p = 0.0062). Overall survival at 1-3 years was 90, 58 and 44 %. At univariate analysis, the local effectiveness of RFA did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

RFA of hepatic METS from breast cancer has high local effectiveness in tumours up to 30 mm, but it is not relevant in determining survival.

Percutaneous cryoablation of liver metastases from breast cancer: initial experience in 17 patients

AIM

To assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of percutaneous cryoablation for the treatment of liver metastases from breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 39 liver metastases in 17 female breast cancer patients who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous cryoablation. The mean age of the cohort was 55 years (range 30-66 years). The tumour response was evaluated by CT performed before treatment, 1 month after treatment, and every 3 months thereafter. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to assess the patients' quality of life before, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after cryoablation. The primary endpoints were technique effectiveness, quality of life, and complications.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 92% with no major complication reported. At the 1-month follow-up, the primary technique effectiveness was 87.1% (34 of 39 tumours). At the 3-months follow-up, local tumour progression was observed in six of 39 lesions (15.4%). The 1-year survival from the time of cryoablation was 70.6%. The quality of life symptoms and functioning scales were preserved in patients alive at 3 months after cryoablation. The global quality of life, mean value of "pain" and "fatigue" between 3 months after cryoablation and prior to treatment showed statistically significant differences, but no clinical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoablation is a safe and effective ablative therapy, providing a high rate of local tumour control in breast cancer liver metastases.

A comparison of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation versus systemic therapy alone in the treatment of breast cancer metastasis to the liver

OBJECTIVES

There is controversy about the roles of locoregional therapies in patients with liver metastases from breast cancer (LMBC). The aim of this study was to analyse survival after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of LMBC and to compare this with survival in patients receiving systemic therapy (ST) alone.

METHODS

During 1996-2011, 24 patients who had failed to respond or had shown an incomplete response to ST underwent laparoscopic RFA for LMBC. Outcomes in these patients were compared with those in 32 patients with LMBC matched by tumour size and number, but treated with ST alone. Clinical parameters and overall survival were compared using t-tests, chi-squared tests and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The groups were similar in hormone receptor status and chemotherapy exposure. In the laparoscopic RFA and ST groups, respectively, the mean ± standard deviation size of the dominant liver tumour and the number of tumours per patient were 3.7 ± 0.4 cm and 2.4 ± 0.4 cm, and 2.6 ± 0.4 tumours and 3.3 ± 0.4 tumours, respectively. These differences were not significant. At a median follow-up of 20 months in the laparoscopic RFA group, 42% of patients were found to have developed local liver recurrence, 63% had developed new liver disease and 38% had developed extrahepatic disease. Overall survival after the diagnosis of liver metastasis was 47 months in the laparoscopic RFA group and 9 months in the ST-only group (P = 0.0001). Five-year survival after the diagnosis of liver metastasis was 29% in the RFA group and 0% in the ST-only group.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to compare outcomes in RFA and ST, respectively, in LMBC. The results show that survival after laparoscopic RFA plus ST is better than that after ST alone.

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) with gemcitabine: phase II study in patients with liver metastases of breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of transarterial chemoembolization with gemcitabine in patients with inoperable liver metastases of breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Open-label, prospective non-randomized single-center study design; patients had previous chemotherapy including anthracyclines and/or taxanes in the metastatic setting, adequate bone marrow reserve, sufficient liver/renal function, no centralnervous system metastases, Karnovsky-performance-status >70%, and life expectancy >12 weeks. Forty-three patients were enrolled (median 58 years, range 48-71). A suspension of gemcitabine 1.200mg/m(2), 2-10 ml/m(2) of Lipiodol, and 5 ml of a degradable starch microsphere (Embocept) suspension, were administered intra-arterially up to 3 times with a 4-weaks-interval. Dose-limiting toxicit is defined as grade 4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, or nonhematologic toxicity>grade 3. Tumor response was evaluated by magnetic resonance (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) imaging.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated the treatment well; with no dose limiting toxicities. Imaging follow-up according to the RECIST-criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) revealed a partial response in 3 patients, stable disease in 16 patients and progression in 22 patients. The progression free survival was 3.3 months. A significant correlation exists only with the factor vascularization: strongly vascularized tumors show a significantly lowered response. Patients with complete or partial response and the main fraction of the stable disease group showed in the MRI and angiography only a moderate vascularization. The resulting estimate of the total survival rate amounts to a median of 10.2 months.

CONCLUSION

Transarterial chemoembolization with gemcitabine is well tolerated and provides an alternative treatment method for patients with liver metastases of breast cancer.

Interventional oncologic approaches to liver metastases

Metastatic liver disease is the most common cause of death in cancer patients. Complete surgical resection is currently considered the only curative treatment, with only about 25% of patients being amenable to surgery. Therefore, a variety of interventional oncologic techniques have been developed for treating secondary liver malignancies. The aim of these therapies is either to allow patients with unresectable tumors to become surgical candidates, provide curative treatment options in nonsurgical candidates, or improve survival in a palliative or even curative approach. Among these interventional therapies are transcatheter therapies such as portal vein embolization, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization, as well as interstitial techniques, particularly radiofrequency ablation as the most commonly applied technique. The rationale, application and clinical results of each of these techniques are reviewed on the basis of the current literature. Future prospects such as gene therapy and immunotherapy are introduced.

Thermal ablation therapies in patients with breast cancer liver metastases: a review

BACKGROUND

The liver is involved in about half of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Unfortunately systemic chemotherapy as the treatment of choice is limited. Due to multifocality and/or insufficient remnant liver volume, the majority of liver metastases are also unresectable. Currently, thermal ablations are used in these patients with acceptable impact.

METHODS

We reviewed studies on radiofrequency ablation (RFA), laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) and microwave ablation (MWA) regarding local tumour response, progression and survival indexes in patients with breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM).

RESULTS

The reviewed literature showed positive response rates of 63 % to 97 % in RF-ablated lesions, 98.2 % in LITT-treated lesions and 34.5-62.5 % in MW-ablated lesions. Median survival was 10.9-60 months using RFA, 51-54 months after LITT and 41.8 months using MWA. Five-year survival rates were 27-30 %, 35 % and 29 %, respectively. Local tumour progression ranged from 13.5 % to 58 % using RFA, 2.9 % with LITT and 9.6 % with MWA.

CONCLUSION

The reviewed literature demonstrated that ablation therapies either as single therapy or combined with other locoregional therapies are a good alternative as an adjunction to resection in patients with resectable lesions or with positive response using chemotherapy. However, multicentre randomised studies should be conducted to obtain further evidence of the benefits of these treatments in patients with BCLM.

Percutaneous computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy ablation of breast cancer liver metastases: initial experience with 80 lesions

PURPOSE

To analyze initial experience with computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (CT-HDRBT) ablation of breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2010, 37 consecutive women with 80 liver metastases were treated with CT-HDRBT in 56 sessions. Mean age was 58.6 years (range, 34-83 y). Treatment was performed by CT-guided applicator placement and high-dose-rate brachytherapy with an iridium-192 source. The mean radiation dose was 18.57 Gy (standard deviation 2.27). Tumor response was evaluated by gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed before treatment, 6 weeks after treatment, and every 3 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Two patients were lost to follow-up; the remaining 35 patients were available for MR imaging evaluation for a mean follow-up time of 11.6 months (range 3-32 mo). Mean tumor diameter was 25.5 mm (range 8-74 mm). Two (2.6%) local recurrences were observed after local tumor control for 10 months and 12 months. Both local progressions were successfully retreated. Distant tumor progression (new metastases or enlargement of nontreated metastases) occurred during the follow-up period in 11 (31.4%) patients. Seven (20%) patients died during the follow-up period. Overall survival ranged from 3-39 months (median 18 months).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-HDRBT is a safe and effective ablative therapy, providing a high rate of local tumor control in patients with BCLM.

Ki-67 is a prognostic biomarker of survival after radiofrequency ablation of liver malignancies

PURPOSE

To assess the predictive value of examinations of tissue adherent to multitined electrodes on local tumor progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) after liver tumor radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant review identified 68 liver tumors treated with RFA in 63 patients with at least 3 years' follow-up. Tissue adherent to the electrode after liver tumor RFA was evaluated with proliferation (Ki-67) and apoptotic (caspase-3) markers. LPFS and OS were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methodology and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis assessed the effect of tumor size, pathology, and post-RFA tissue characteristics on LPFS and OS.

RESULTS

Post-RFA tissue examination classified 55 of the 68 tumors as completely ablated with coagulation necrosis, with cells positive for caspase-3 and negative for Ki-67 (CN). Thirteen had viable Ki-67-positive tumor cells. Mean liver tumor size was larger in the viable (V) group versus the CN group (3.4 vs. 2.5 cm, respectively; P = .017). For the V and CN groups, respectively, local tumor progression occurred in 12 (92 %) of 13 and 23 (42 %) of 55 specimens. One, 3-, and 5-year LPFS was 8 %, 8 %, and 8 %, and 79 %, 47 %, and 47 % (P < .001) for the V and CN groups, respectively. During a 63-month median follow-up, 92 % of patients in the V group and 58 % in the CN group died, resulting in 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 92 %, 25 %, and 8 % vs. 92 %, 59 %, and 33 % (P = .032), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ki-67-positive tumor cells on the electrode after liver tumor RFA is an independent predictor of LPFS and OS. Size, initially thought to be an independent risk factor for local tumor progression in tumors 3-5 cm, does not hold its significance at long follow-up.

Radiofrequency ablation of metastatic lesions from breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women. Various studies [5,6] have shown that surgical resection of single liver or lung metastases in patients with metastases from BC increases survival. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be an alternative to resection in some patients when resection is not feasible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2002 to December 2008, 491 patients with liver metastases underwent US-guided percutaneous RFA. Of these patients 5 (5/491; 1%) had BC. In the same period, 32 patients with pulmonary metastases underwent CT-guided RFA. Of these patients 3 (3/32; 9%) had BC. Mean age was 61.3 years. All patients were postmenopausal and receiving polychemotherapy according to international guidelines. Inclusion criteria for RFA treatment of metastases from BC applied are identical or in some cases more restrictive than those reported in the literature.

RESULTS

There were no deaths or severe complications and no treatment failures. Disease free and overall median survival were respectively 7.65 and 25.7 months after US-guided RFA and 13.4 and 34.8 months after CT-guided RFA. During follow-up (mean follow-up 26 months, range 4-63 months) 5/8 (62.5%) patients exhibited recurrence: 3/5 (60%) had local recurrence and 2/5 (40%) had non-local recurrence; 4/5 patients with recurrence were re-treated.

DISCUSSION

The authors' experience confirms that RFA is an effective, safe and repeatable technique in the treatment of metastases from BC. Metastatic recurrence rate confirms that metastatic BC is a disease which requires a multidisciplinary approach and that the role of chemotherapy is indisputable. Effects on survival are promising but further confirmation is needed through prospective randomized studies.

The role of surgery in metastatic breast cancer

Some of the patients who present with breast cancer already have distant metastatic disease. According to recent literature, these patients may benefit from resection of the breast tumour. One explanation for the effect of this resection is that reducing the tumour load influences metastatic growth. Results of future randomised controlled trials should indicate whether surgery of the breast tumour truly improves survival. Selected patients could even benefit from metastasectomy of liver and lung metastases; survival seems to improve and these procedures seldom lead to major complications. When metastasectomy is not possible, minimally invasive techniques can be used in selected patients for the treatment of breast cancer liver metastases, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) being discussed most in the literature. Patients with locally advanced breast cancer are treated multidisciplinarily and with curative intent. Part of the treatment is surgery to reduce tumour load. Regarding treatment of the axilla, in a clinically negative axilla sentinel node biopsy is advised before neoadjuvant treatment; an axillary lymph node dissection is not warranted. In local recurrence, surgery is the primary treatment. Axillary staging can be done in patients with a previous negative sentinel node biopsy. Regional recurrence after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy is treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy.