1
|
Rogasch JMM, Jochens HV, Metzger G, Wetz C, Kaufmann J, Furth C, Amthauer H, Schatka I. Keeping Up With ChatGPT: Evaluating Its Recognition and Interpretation of Nuclear Medicine Images. Clin Nucl Med 2024:00003072-990000000-01037. [PMID: 38661379 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000005207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The latest iteration of GPT4 (generative pretrained transformer) is a large multimodal model that can integrate both text and image input, but its performance with medical images has not been systematically evaluated. We studied whether ChatGPT with GPT-4V(ision) can recognize images from common nuclear medicine examinations and interpret them. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifteen representative images (scintigraphy, 11; PET, 4) were submitted to ChatGPT with GPT-4V(ision), both in its Default and "Advanced Data Analysis (beta)" version. ChatGPT was asked to name the type of examination and tracer, explain the findings and whether there are abnormalities. ChatGPT should also mark anatomical structures or pathological findings. The appropriateness of the responses was rated by 3 nuclear medicine physicians. RESULTS The Default version identified the examination and the tracer correctly in the majority of the 15 cases (60% or 53%) and gave an "appropriate" description of the findings or abnormalities in 47% or 33% of cases, respectively. The Default version cannot manipulate images. "Advanced Data Analysis (beta)" failed in all tasks in >90% of cases. A "major" or "incompatible" inconsistency between 3 trials of the same prompt was observed in 73% (Default version) or 87% of cases ("Advanced Data Analysis (beta)" version). CONCLUSIONS Although GPT-4V(ision) demonstrates preliminary capabilities in analyzing nuclear medicine images, it exhibits significant limitations, particularly in its reliability (ie, correctness, predictability, and consistency).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hans V Jochens
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| | - Giulia Metzger
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| | - Christoph Wetz
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| | - Jonas Kaufmann
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| | - Christian Furth
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| | - Holger Amthauer
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| | - Imke Schatka
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fabritius MP, Garlipp B, Öcal O, Puhr-Westerheide D, Amthauer H, Geyer T, Holzgreve A, Ricke J, Kupitz D, Grosser OS, Omari J, Pech M, Seidensticker M, Grawe F, Seidensticker R. Assessing regional hepatic function changes after hypertrophy induction by radioembolisation: comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Eur Radiol Exp 2024; 8:15. [PMID: 38282160 PMCID: PMC10822831 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-023-00409-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare Gd-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 99mTc-labelled mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) as imaging-based liver function tests after unilateral radioembolisation (RE) in patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies. METHODS Twenty-three patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI within a prospective study (REVoluTion) were evaluated. REVoluTion was a prospective open-label, non-randomised, therapy-optimising study of patients undergoing right-sided or sequential RE for contralateral liver hypertrophy at a single centre in Germany. MRI and hepatobiliary scintigraphy were performed before RE (baseline) and 6 weeks after (follow-up). This exploratory subanalysis compared liver enhancement on hepatobiliary phase MRI normalised to the spleen (liver-to-spleen ratio (LSR)) and the muscle (liver-to-muscle ratio (LMR)) with mebrofenin uptake on HBS for the total liver (TL) and separately for the right (RLL) and left liver lobe (LLL). RESULTS Mebrofenin uptake at baseline and follow-up each correlated significantly with LSR and LMR on MRI for TL (≤ 0.013) and RLL (≤ 0.049). Regarding the LLL, mebrofenin uptake correlated significantly with LMR (baseline, p = 0.013; follow-up, p = 0.004), whereas with LSR, a borderline significant correlation was only seen at follow-up (p = 0.051; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION LSRs and LMR correlate with mebrofenin uptake in HBS. This study indicates that Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and 99mTc-labelled mebrofenin HBS may equally be used to assess an increase in contralateral liver lobe function after right-sided RE. RELEVANCE STATEMENT MRI may be a convenient and reliable method for assessing the future liver remnant facilitating treatment planning and monitoring of patients after RE-induced hypertrophy induction. KEY POINTS • Both MRI and HBS can assess liver function after RE. • Liver enhancement on MRI correlates with mebrofenin uptake on HBS. • MRI might be a convenient alternative for estimating future liver remnants after hypertrophy induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Garlipp
- General Surgery, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dennis Kupitz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Oliver S Grosser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Freba Grawe
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wetz C, Ruhwedel T, Schatka I, Grabowski J, Jann H, Metzger G, Galler M, Amthauer H, Rogasch JMM. Plasma Markers for Therapy Response Monitoring in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5717. [PMID: 38136263 PMCID: PMC10741556 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pretherapeutic chromogranin A, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), or De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase) are prognostic factors in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). However, their value for intratherapeutic monitoring remains unclear. We evaluated if changes in plasma markers during PRRT can help identify patients with unfavorable outcomes. METHODS A monocentric retrospective analysis of 141 patients with NET undergoing PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC was conducted. Changes in laboratory parameters were calculated by dividing the values determined immediately before each cycle of PRRT by the pretherapeutic value. Patients with low vs. high PFS were compared with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS Progression, relapse, or death after PRRT was observed in 103/141 patients. Patients with low PFS showed a significant relative ALP increase before the third (p = 0.014) and fourth (p = 0.039) cycles of PRRT. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median PFS of 24.3 months (95% CI, 20.7-27.8 months) in patients with decreasing ALP values (Δ > 10%) during treatment, 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.2-15.8 months) in patients with increasing ALP values (Δ > 10%), and 17.7 months (95% CI, 13.6-21.8 months) with stable ALP values (Δ ± 10%). CONCLUSIONS Based on these exploratory data, a rise in plasma ALP might indicate disease progression and should be interpreted cautiously during therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Wetz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (T.R.); (G.M.); (M.G.); (H.A.); (J.M.M.R.)
| | - Tristan Ruhwedel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (T.R.); (G.M.); (M.G.); (H.A.); (J.M.M.R.)
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (T.R.); (G.M.); (M.G.); (H.A.); (J.M.M.R.)
| | - Jane Grabowski
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Henning Jann
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Giulia Metzger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (T.R.); (G.M.); (M.G.); (H.A.); (J.M.M.R.)
| | - Markus Galler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (T.R.); (G.M.); (M.G.); (H.A.); (J.M.M.R.)
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (T.R.); (G.M.); (M.G.); (H.A.); (J.M.M.R.)
| | - Julian M. M. Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (T.R.); (G.M.); (M.G.); (H.A.); (J.M.M.R.)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rogasch JMM, Metzger G, Preisler M, Galler M, Thiele F, Brenner W, Feldhaus F, Wetz C, Amthauer H, Furth C, Schatka I. ChatGPT: Can You Prepare My Patients for [ 18F]FDG PET/CT and Explain My Reports? J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1876-1879. [PMID: 37709536 PMCID: PMC10690125 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
We evaluated whether the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT can adequately answer patient questions related to [18F]FDG PET/CT in common clinical indications before and after scanning. Methods: Thirteen questions regarding [18F]FDG PET/CT were submitted to ChatGPT. ChatGPT was also asked to explain 6 PET/CT reports (lung cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma) and answer 6 follow-up questions (e.g., on tumor stage or recommended treatment). To be rated "useful" or "appropriate," a response had to be adequate by the standards of the nuclear medicine staff. Inconsistency was assessed by regenerating responses. Results: Responses were rated "appropriate" for 92% of 25 tasks and "useful" for 96%. Considerable inconsistencies were found between regenerated responses for 16% of tasks. Responses to 83% of sensitive questions (e.g., staging/treatment options) were rated "empathetic." Conclusion: ChatGPT might adequately substitute for advice given to patients by nuclear medicine staff in the investigated settings. Improving the consistency of ChatGPT would further increase reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian M M Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany;
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giulia Metzger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martina Preisler
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and
| | - Markus Galler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Thiele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Feldhaus
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Wetz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zschaeck S, Klinger B, van den Hoff J, Cegla P, Apostolova I, Kreissl MC, Cholewiński W, Kukuk E, Strobel H, Amthauer H, Blüthgen N, Zips D, Hofheinz F. Combination of tumor asphericity and an extracellular matrix-related prognostic gene signature in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20840. [PMID: 38012155 PMCID: PMC10681996 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46405-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
One important aim of precision oncology is a personalized treatment of patients. This can be achieved by various biomarkers, especially imaging parameters and gene expression signatures are commonly used. So far, combination approaches are sparse. The aim of the study was to independently validate the prognostic value of the novel positron emission tomography (PET) parameter tumor asphericity (ASP) in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and to investigate associations between published gene expression profiles and ASP. This was a retrospective evaluation of PET imaging and gene expression data from three public databases and two institutional datasets. The whole cohort comprised 253 NSCLC patients, all treated with curative intent surgery. Clinical parameters, standard PET parameters and ASP were evaluated in all patients. Additional gene expression data were available for 120 patients. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for the primary endpoint progression-free survival (PFS) and additional endpoints. Furthermore, multivariate cox regression testing was performed including clinically significant parameters, ASP, and the extracellular matrix-related prognostic gene signature (EPPI). In the whole cohort, a significant association with PFS was observed for ASP (p < 0.001) and EPPI (p = 0.012). Upon multivariate testing, EPPI remained significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.018) in the subgroup of patients with additional gene expression data, while ASP was significantly associated with PFS in the whole cohort (p = 0.012). In stage II patients, ASP was significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.009), and a previously published cutoff value for ASP (19.5%) was successfully validated (p = 0.008). In patients with additional gene expression data, EPPI showed a significant association with PFS, too (p = 0.033). The exploratory combination of ASP and EPPI showed that the combinatory approach has potential to further improve patient stratification compared to the use of only one parameter. We report the first successful validation of EPPI and ASP in stage II NSCLC patients. The combination of both parameters seems to be a very promising approach for improvement of risk stratification in a group of patients with urgent need for a more personalized treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bertram Klinger
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178, Berlin, Germany
- Computational Modelling in Medicine, Instiute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Paulina Cegla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael C Kreissl
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Witold Cholewiński
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Emily Kukuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helen Strobel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Blüthgen
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178, Berlin, Germany
- Computational Modelling in Medicine, Instiute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baitullina A, Claude G, Sucena SF, Nisli E, Scholz C, Bhardwaj P, Amthauer H, Brenner W, Geppert C, Gorges C, Abram U, da Silva Maia PI, Spreckelmeyer S. Metallacages with 2,6-dipicolinoylbis(N,N-dialkylthioureas) as novel platforms in nuclear medicine for 68Ga, 177Lu and 198Au. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem 2023; 8:40. [PMID: 37982944 PMCID: PMC10661681 DOI: 10.1186/s41181-023-00225-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heterometallic gold metallacages are of great interest for the incorporation of several cations. Especially in nuclear medicine, those metallacages can serve as a platform for radionuclides relevant for imaging or therapy (e.g. 68Ga or 177Lu). Moreover, the radionuclide 198Au is an attractive beta emitter, for potential application in nuclear medicine. Here, we aim to synthesize a new set of gold metallacages and to study their ability to coordinate to 68Ga, 177Lu and 198Au. RESULTS New heterometallic gold metallacages of composition [M{Au(Lmorph-κS)}3] (M = La3+, Tb3+, Lu3+ or Y3+) and [Ga{Au(Lmorph-κS)}2]NO3 have been synthesized from 2,6-dipicolinoylbis(N,N-morpholinylthiourea) (H2Lmorph) with [AuCl(THT)] and the target M3+ metal ions in yields ranging from 33 (Lu) to 62% (Tb). The characterization of the compounds bases on ESI-MS, 1H NMR, IR, EA and single-crystal X-ray diffraction techniques (all except the Ga derivative). Selected gold cages derived from H2Lmorph were compared to previously reported gold cages that were derived from 2,6-dipicolinoylbis(N,N-diethylthiourea) (H2Ldiethyl). The tested metallacages show similar IC50 values close to that of auranofin in four different cancer cell lines (MCF-7, PC-3, U383, U343), e.g. 4.5 ± 0.7 µM for [Ga{Au(Ldiethyl)}2]NO3 on PC-3. The radiolabeling experiments thereof show high radiochemical purities with 68Ga and 198Au and low radiochemical purity with 177Lu. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that these gold metallacages could serve as a novel platform for inclusion of different (radio)nuclides with potential theranostic applications in nuclear medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Baitullina
- Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstr. 34-36, 14195, Berlin, Germany
| | - Guilhem Claude
- Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstr. 34-36, 14195, Berlin, Germany
| | - Suelen F Sucena
- Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstr. 34-36, 14195, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eda Nisli
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cedric Scholz
- Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstr. 34-36, 14195, Berlin, Germany
| | - Punita Bhardwaj
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christopher Geppert
- Forschungsreaktor TRIGA Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Fritz-Strassmann-Weg 2, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christian Gorges
- Forschungsreaktor TRIGA Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Fritz-Strassmann-Weg 2, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ulrich Abram
- Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstr. 34-36, 14195, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pedro Ivo da Silva Maia
- Núcleo de Desenvolvimento de Compostos Bioativos (NDCBio), Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, 38025-440, Brazil.
| | - Sarah Spreckelmeyer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Balzer M, Spiecker F, Bluemel S, Amthauer H, Brenner W, Spreckelmeyer S. Evaluation of the 177mLu-concentration in in-house produced 177Lu-radiopharmaceuticals and commercially available Lutathera ®. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem 2023; 8:37. [PMID: 37930495 PMCID: PMC10628054 DOI: 10.1186/s41181-023-00222-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 177Lu-radiopharmaceuticals can contain the metastable impurity [177mLu]lutetium with a physical half-life of 160.4 days, in varying concentrations depending on the route of production of the radionuclidic precursor [177Lu]lutetium. Due to the long half-life of [177mLu]lutetium, difficulties with waste disposal or sterility testing could arise. Here, we analyzed several 177Lu-samples of different origins and suppliers regarding their 177mLu-concentration. RESULTS All samples tested showed a 177mLu-concentration in the range that was stated on the certificate of analysis from the supplier which is in accordance with the European Pharmacopoeia. CONCLUSIONS Although all 177mLu-concentrations were in accordance with the European Pharmacopoeia, we need to take into account the respective national legislation regarding radioactivity release limits. With regard to the German legislation, several probes for sterility testing in external laboratories could not be released for transport due to the concentration of [177mLu]lutetium. Moreover, waste water tanks should specifically be monitored for 177mLu-concentration, when e.g. Lutathera® is administered in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Balzer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Fleur Spiecker
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Sarah Spreckelmeyer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jiang X, Hu X, Daamen M, Wang X, Fan C, Meiberth D, Spottke A, Roeske S, Fliessbach K, Spruth EJ, Altenstein S, Lohse A, Hansen N, Glanz W, Incesoy EI, Dobisch L, Janowitz D, Rauchmann BS, Ramirez A, Kilimann I, Munk MH, Wang X, Schneider LS, Gabelin T, Roy N, Wolfsgruber S, Kleineidam L, Hetzer S, Dechent P, Ewers M, Scheffler K, Amthauer H, Buchert R, Essler M, Drzezga A, Rominger A, Krause BJ, Reimold M, Priller J, Schneider A, Wiltfang J, Buerger K, Perneczky R, Teipel S, Laske C, Peters O, Düzel E, Wagner M, Jiang J, Jessen F, Boecker H, Han Y. Altered limbic functional connectivity in individuals with subjective cognitive decline: Converging and diverging findings across Chinese and German cohorts. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:4922-4934. [PMID: 37070734 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It remains unclear whether functional brain networks are consistently altered in individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) of diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds and whether the network alterations are associated with an amyloid burden. METHODS Cross-sectional resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity (FC) and amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET) data from the Chinese Sino Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Decline and German DZNE Longitudinal Cognitive Impairment and Dementia cohorts were analyzed. RESULTS Limbic FC, particularly hippocampal connectivity with right insula, was consistently higher in SCD than in controls, and correlated with SCD-plus features. Smaller SCD subcohorts with PET showed inconsistent amyloid positivity rates and FC-amyloid associations across cohorts. DISCUSSION Our results suggest an early adaptation of the limbic network in SCD, which may reflect increased awareness of cognitive decline, irrespective of amyloid pathology. Different amyloid positivity rates may indicate a heterogeneous underlying etiology in Eastern and Western SCD cohorts when applying current research criteria. Future studies should identify culture-specific features to enrich preclinical Alzheimer's disease in non-Western populations. HIGHLIGHTS Common limbic hyperconnectivity across Chinese and German subjective cognitive decline (SCD) cohorts was observed. Limbic hyperconnectivity may reflect awareness of cognition, irrespective of amyloid load. Further cross-cultural harmonization of SCD regarding Alzheimer's disease pathology is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueyan Jiang
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Hainan Province, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, China
| | - Xiaochen Hu
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marcel Daamen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Xiaoqi Wang
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chunqiu Fan
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dix Meiberth
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annika Spottke
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sandra Roeske
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Klaus Fliessbach
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Bonn, Germany
| | - Eike Jakob Spruth
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Slawek Altenstein
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Lohse
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Niels Hansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Wenzel Glanz
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Enise I Incesoy
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research (IKND), Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Clinic Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Laura Dobisch
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Janowitz
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Boris-Stephan Rauchmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alfredo Ramirez
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Bonn, Germany
- Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Division of Neurogenetics and Molecular Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry & Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Ingo Kilimann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Matthias H Munk
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Xiao Wang
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin-Institute of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luisa-Sophie Schneider
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin-Institute of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tatjana Gabelin
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin-Institute of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Roy
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Steffen Wolfsgruber
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Bonn, Germany
| | - Luca Kleineidam
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stefan Hetzer
- Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Dechent
- MR-Research in Neurosciences, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Michael Ewers
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Scheffler
- Department for Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph Buchert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Essler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-2), Molecular Organization of the Brain, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Matthias Reimold
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Josef Priller
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Berlin, Germany
- School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany
- University of Edinburgh and UK DRI, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anja Schneider
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany
- Neurosciences and Signaling Group, Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Katharina Buerger
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Perneczky
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich, Munich, Germany
- Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit (AGE), School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Christoph Laske
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tuebingen, Germany
- Section for Dementia Research, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Peters
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin-Institute of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Emrah Düzel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research (IKND), Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael Wagner
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jiehui Jiang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
| | - Frank Jessen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Henning Boecker
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Clinical Functional Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ying Han
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Hainan Province, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, China
- Center of Alzheimer's Disease, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gaal S, Huang K, Rogasch JMM, Jochens HV, De Santis M, Erber B, Amthauer H. Prognostic Value of the De Ritis Ratio for Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Undergoing [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4907. [PMID: 37894274 PMCID: PMC10605155 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The De Ritis ratio (=aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase) has shown prognostic value in different cancer types. This is the first such analysis in prostate cancer patients undergoing radioligand therapy (RLT) with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. This retrospective monocentric analysis included 91 patients with a median of 3 RLT cycles (range 1-6) and median cumulative activity of 17.3 GBq. Univariable Cox regression regarding overall survival (OS) included age, different types of previous treatment, metastatic patterns and different laboratory parameters before RLT. Based on multivariable Cox regression, a prognostic score was derived. Seventy-two patients (79%) died (median follow-up in survivors: 19.8 months). A higher number of previous chemotherapy lines, the presence of liver metastases, brain metastases, a higher tumor load on PSMA-PET, a higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, lower red blood cell count, lower hemoglobin, higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and higher De Ritis ratio were associated with shorter OS (each p < 0.05). In multivariable Cox, a higher number of chemotherapy lines (range, 0-2; p = 0.036), brain metastases (p < 0.001), higher PSA (p = 0.004) and higher De Ritis ratio before RLT (hazard ratio, 1.27 per unit increase; p = 0.023) remained significant. This prognostic score separated five groups with a significantly different median OS ranging from 4.9 to 28.1 months (log-rank test, p < 0.001). If validated independently, the De Ritis ratio could enhance multifactorial models for OS after RLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Gaal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Praxen für Diagnostische und Therapeutische Nuklearmedizin, Düppelstr. 30, 12163 Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian M M Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans V Jochens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Barbara Erber
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Doll C, Bigus S, Hofmann E, Mrosk F, Steffen C, Thiele F, Voss J, Kreutzer K, Amthauer H, Heiland M, Koerdt S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in recurrent or secondary oral squamous cell carcinoma after previous neck dissection. Oral Oncol 2023; 145:106494. [PMID: 37517214 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the potential of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with recurrent or a secondary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) without clinical signs of lymph node metastases (cN0), who were previously treated with a surgical approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of all patients with cN0 recurrent or secondary OSCC, who were treated using SLNB after previous neck dissection. Endpoints were sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection rate, negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity. RESULTS A total of 17 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years were included. SLN were detected in 15 of 17 cases (detection rate: 88.2%). In seven patients (41.2%), a bilateral or contralateral lymph drainage of a unilateral carcinoma was found. Two patients (11.8%) demonstrated a positive SLN upon pathohistological analysis, which led to an upstaging. In one case, a non-SLN was positive, which is considered a false-negative result. The mean follow-up for all patients with histologically negative SLN including the patients without a detected SLN was 11.8 months (range: 0-31 months). Of these, one patient developed (isolated) neck recurrence after 12 months resulting in an overall NPV of 86.7% and a sensitivity of 50.0% for the SLNB as a neck staging procedure. CONCLUSION SLNB can improve the staging of patients with recurrent or secondary OSCC, who present with a history of a previous neck dissection. Further studies are required to demonstrate the oncological benefit of SLNB in this patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Doll
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Bigus
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Elena Hofmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Friedrich Mrosk
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudius Steffen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Thiele
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Voss
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kilian Kreutzer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Koerdt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Damm R, Bregenzer C, Steffen I, Amthauer H, Seidensticker R, Seidensticker M, Omari J, Ricke J, Pech M. Cholecystitis induced by Yttrium-90 radioembolization of advanced liver tumors: prospective evaluation of a management algorithm in 197 consecutive patients. Acta Radiol 2023; 64:2783-2790. [PMID: 37525508 DOI: 10.1177/02841851231189490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholecystitis is a rare but dolorous complication after Y90-radioembolization of liver malignancies. PURPOSE To decide the occlusion of the cystic artery (CA) to prevent cholecystitis after Y90 radioembolization using an algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 130 patients, the gallbladder was at risk of embolization as the right liver lobe was targeted. Precautionary measures (e.g. coil occlusion of the cystic artery) were decided by enhancement of the gallbladder in pre-treatment Tc99m-MAA SPECT/CT and performed directly before Y90 radioembolization. In non-enhancing cases, the CA was left open. The outcome was determined by clinical symptoms of acute or chronic cholecystitis as well as imaging and laboratory parameters. Findings were additionally classified according to the Tokyo Guidelines of acute cholecystitis. RESULTS Only 16 patients demonstrated enhancement of the gallbladder in Tc99m-MAA SPECT/CT. Including additional indications from angiographic findings, prophylactic measures were scheduled in 22 patients (standard of care). Thus, 121 patients were at risk of non-target embolization to the gallbladder during Y90 microsphere administration (investigative arm). Four cases (3.0%) of cholecystitis occurred by clinical presentation: two patients with onset of acute symptoms within 48 h after Y90 radioembolization ("embolic cholecystitis") and two patients with late onset of symptoms ("radiogenic cholecystitis"). The incidence of cholecystitis was not significantly more frequent without indication of precautionary measures (investigative cohort 2.9% vs. standard of care 4.7%; P = 0.53). CONCLUSION The overall incidence of cholecystitis after Y90 radioembolization is low. Determination of cystic artery intervention using Tc99m-MAA SPECT/CT successfully balances the incidence of symptomatic cholecystitis with unnecessary vessel occlusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Damm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Radiology Practice, Dessau-Roßlau, Germany
| | - Carola Bregenzer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Steffen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charite Berlin - Universtitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charite Berlin - Universtitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Saalfeld S, Kreher R, Hille G, Niemann U, Hinnerichs M, Öcal O, Schütte K, Zech CJ, Loewe C, van Delden O, Vandecaveye V, Verslype C, Gebauer B, Sengel C, Bargellini I, Iezzi R, Berg T, Klümpen HJ, Benckert J, Gasbarrini A, Amthauer H, Sangro B, Malfertheiner P, Preim B, Ricke J, Seidensticker M, Pech M, Surov A. Prognostic role of radiomics-based body composition analysis for the 1-year survival for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2023; 14:2301-2309. [PMID: 37592827 PMCID: PMC10570090 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parameters of body composition have prognostic potential in patients with oncologic diseases. The aim of the present study was to analyse the prognostic potential of radiomics-based parameters of the skeletal musculature and adipose tissues in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Radiomics features were extracted from a cohort of 297 HCC patients as post hoc sub-study of the SORAMIC randomized controlled trial. Patients were treated with selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in combination with sorafenib or with sorafenib alone yielding two groups: (1) sorafenib monotherapy (n = 147) and (2) sorafenib and SIRT (n = 150). The main outcome was 1-year survival. Segmentation of muscle tissue and adipose tissue was used to retrieve 881 features. Correlation analysis and feature cleansing yielded 292 features for each patient group and each tissue type. We combined 9 feature selection methods with 10 feature set compositions to build 90 feature sets. We used 11 classifiers to build 990 models. We subdivided the patient groups into a train and validation cohort and a test cohort, that is, one third of the patient groups. RESULTS We used the train and validation set to identify the best feature selection and classification model and applied it to the test set for each patient group. Classification yields for patients who underwent sorafenib monotherapy an accuracy of 75.51% and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7576 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6376-0.8776). For patients who underwent treatment with SIRT and sorafenib, results are accuracy = 78.00% and AUC = 0.8032 (95% CI: 0.6930-0.9134). CONCLUSIONS Parameters of radiomics-based analysis of the skeletal musculature and adipose tissue predict 1-year survival in patients with advanced HCC. The prognostic value of radiomics-based parameters was higher in patients who were treated with SIRT and sorafenib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Saalfeld
- Research Campus STIMULATE at the University of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
- Department of Simulation and GraphicsUniversity of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
| | - Robert Kreher
- Research Campus STIMULATE at the University of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
- Department of Simulation and GraphicsUniversity of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
| | - Georg Hille
- Research Campus STIMULATE at the University of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
- Department of Simulation and GraphicsUniversity of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
| | - Uli Niemann
- University LibraryUniversity of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
| | - Mattes Hinnerichs
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineOvGU MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
| | - Osman Öcal
- Department of RadiologyLMU University HospitalMunichGermany
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and GastroenterologyNiels‐Stensen‐Kliniken MarienhospitalOsnabrückGermany
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und EndokrinologieMedizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)HannoverGermany
| | - Christoph J. Zech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital Basel, University of BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Christian Loewe
- Section of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image‐Guided TherapyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Otto van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAcademic University Medical CentersAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Chris Verslype
- Department of Digestive OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of RadiologyCharité – University Medicine BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Christian Sengel
- Department of RadiologyGrenoble University HospitalLa TroncheFrance
| | - Irene Bargellini
- Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyCandiolo Cancer InstituteTurinItaly
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia d'Urgenza e Interventistica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed EmatologiaRomeItaly
- Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - Thomas Berg
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Sektion HepatologieUniversitätsklinikum LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Heinz J. Klümpen
- Department of Medical OncologyAmsterdam University Medical CentersAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Julia Benckert
- Department of Hepatology and GastroenterologyCampus Virchow Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear MedicineCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver UnitClínica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHDPamplonaSpain
| | | | - Bernhard Preim
- Research Campus STIMULATE at the University of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
- Department of Simulation and GraphicsUniversity of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of RadiologyLMU University HospitalMunichGermany
| | | | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineOvGU MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
| | - Alexey Surov
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear MedicineJohannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University BochumBochumGermany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Galler M, Chibolela C, Rogasch JMM, Huang K, Siefert J, Schatka I, Amthauer H. Dosimetric analysis of a compartmental model for radioligand uptake in tumor lesions. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023. [PMID: 37406616 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ace44a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
Radioligand therapy is a targeted cancer therapy that delivers radiation to tumor cells based on the expression of specific markers on the cell surface. It has become an important treatment option in metastasized neuroendocrine tumors and advanced prostate cancer.
The analysis of absorbed doses in radioligand therapies has gained much attention and remains a challenging task due to individual pharmacokinetics. As an alternative to the often used sum of exponential functions in intra-therapeutic dosimetry, a basic compartmental model for the pharmacokinetics of radioligands is described and analyzed in this paper. In its simplest version, the model behaviour is determined by the uptake capacity and the association constant and can be solved analytically. The model is extended with rates for excretion from the source compartment and externalization from the lesion compartment. Numerical calculations offer an insight into the quantitative effects of the model parameters on the absorbed dose in the tumor lesion. This analysis helps understanding the importance of clinically relevant factors, e.g. the effect on absorbed doses of modified radioligands that bind to albumin. Using clinical data, the potential application in intra-therapeutic dosimetry is illustrated and compared to the bi-exponential function which lacks a mechanistical basis.
While the compartmental model is found to constitute a feasible alternative in these examples, this has to be confirmed by further clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Galler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany, Berlin, 13353, GERMANY
| | - Christoph Chibolela
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany, Berlin, 13353, GERMANY
| | - Julian Manuel Michael Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany, Berlin, 13353, GERMANY
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany, Berlin, 13353, GERMANY
| | - Jeffrey Siefert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany, Berlin, 13353, GERMANY
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany, Berlin, Berlin, 13353, GERMANY
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany, Berlin, 13353, GERMANY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rogasch JMM, Michaels L, Baumgärtner GL, Frost N, Rückert JC, Neudecker J, Ochsenreither S, Gerhold M, Schmidt B, Schneider P, Amthauer H, Furth C, Penzkofer T. A machine learning tool to improve prediction of mediastinal lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer using routinely obtainable [ 18F]FDG-PET/CT parameters. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2140-2151. [PMID: 36820890 PMCID: PMC10199849 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06145-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for pretherapeutic lymph node (LN) staging is limited by false positive findings. Our aim was to evaluate machine learning with routinely obtainable variables to improve accuracy over standard visual image assessment. METHODS Monocentric retrospective analysis of pretherapeutic [18F]FDG-PET/CT in 491 consecutive patients with NSCLC using an analog PET/CT scanner (training + test cohort, n = 385) or digital scanner (validation, n = 106). Forty clinical variables, tumor characteristics, and image variables (e.g., primary tumor and LN SUVmax and size) were collected. Different combinations of machine learning methods for feature selection and classification of N0/1 vs. N2/3 disease were compared. Ten-fold nested cross-validation was used to derive the mean area under the ROC curve of the ten test folds ("test AUC") and AUC in the validation cohort. Reference standard was the final N stage from interdisciplinary consensus (histological results for N2/3 LNs in 96%). RESULTS N2/3 disease was present in 190 patients (39%; training + test, 37%; validation, 46%; p = 0.09). A gradient boosting classifier (GBM) with 10 features was selected as the final model based on test AUC of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.94). Validation AUC was 0.94 (0.89-0.98). At a target sensitivity of approx. 90%, test/validation accuracy of the GBM was 0.78/0.87. This was significantly higher than the accuracy based on "mediastinal LN uptake > mediastinum" (0.7/0.75; each p < 0.05) or combined PET/CT criteria (PET positive and/or LN short axis diameter > 10 mm; 0.68/0.75; each p < 0.001). Harmonization of PET images between the two scanners affected SUVmax and visual assessment of the LNs but did not diminish the AUC of the GBM. CONCLUSIONS A machine learning model based on routinely available variables from [18F]FDG-PET/CT improved accuracy in mediastinal LN staging compared to established visual assessment criteria. A web application implementing this model was made available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian M M Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Liza Michaels
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg L Baumgärtner
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nikolaj Frost
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens-Carsten Rückert
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens Neudecker
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ochsenreither
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Manuela Gerhold
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Schmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine - Pneumology and Sleep Medicine, DRK Kliniken Berlin Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Schneider
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, DRK Kliniken Berlin Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Penzkofer
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Surov A, Thormann M, Hinnerichs M, Seidensticker M, Seidensticker R, Öcal O, Schütte K, Zech CJ, Loewe C, van Delden O, Vandecaveye V, Verslype C, Gebauer B, Sengel C, Bargellini I, Iezzi R, Berg T, Klümpen HJ, Benckert J, Gasbarrini A, Amthauer H, Sangro B, Malfertheiner P, Omari J, Wienke A, Ricke J, Pech M. Impact of body composition in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A subanalysis of the SORAMIC trial. Hepatol Commun 2023; 7:02009842-202306010-00019. [PMID: 37219875 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Body composition parameters have been reported to be prognostic factors in patients with oncologic diseases. However, the available data on patients with HCC are conflicting. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of body composition on survival in patients with HCC treated with sorafenib or selective internal radioembolization (SIRT) and sorafenib. METHODS This is an exploratory subanalysis of the prospective, randomized controlled SORAMIC trial. Within the palliative arm of the study, patients were selected if a baseline abdominal CT was available. A broad set of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue parameters were measured at the L3 level. Low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) and density parameters were defined using published cutoffs. The parameters were correlated with overall survival. RESULTS Of 424 patients in the palliative study arm, 369 patients were included in the analysis. There were 192 patients in the combined sorafenib/SIRT and 177 patients in the sorafenib group. Median overall survival was 9.9 months for the entire cohort and 10.8 and 9.2 months for the SIRT/sorafenib and sorafenib groups, respectively. There was no relevant association of either body composition parameter with overall survival in either the overall cohort or in the SIRT/sorafenib or sorafenib subgroups. CONCLUSIONS This subanalysis of the prospective SORAMIC trial does not suggest a relevant influence of body composition parameters of survival in patients with advanced HCC. Body composition parameters therefore do not serve in patient allocation in this palliative treatment cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Surov
- University Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Thormann
- University Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Mattes Hinnerichs
- University Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Christoph J Zech
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Loewe
- Section of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Otto van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Chris Verslype
- Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Sengel
- Radiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France
| | - Irene Bargellini
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Thomas Berg
- Division of Hepatology, Clinic and Polyclinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectiology, and Pneumology, University Clinic Leipzig, Germany
| | - Heinz J Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julia Benckert
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Department of Internal Medicine, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Jazan Omari
- University Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Wienke
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometry and Informatics, University of Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- University Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cankaya A, Balzer M, Amthauer H, Brenner W, Spreckelmeyer S. Optimization of 177Lu-labelling of DOTA-TOC, PSMA-I&T and FAPI-46 for clinical application. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem 2023; 8:10. [PMID: 37233924 DOI: 10.1186/s41181-023-00196-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 177Lu-radiopharmaceuticals are routinely used for the treatment of various tumor entities. The productions of radiopharmaceuticals follow strict good-manufacturing practice guidelines and synthesis optimizations thereof have a strong impact on e.g. the quality of the product, radiation safety and costs. The purpose of this study is to optimize the precursor load of three radiopharmaceuticals. For that, different precursor loads were evaluated and compared to previously reported findings. RESULTS All three radiopharmaceuticals were successfully synthesized in high radiochemical purities and yields on the ML Eazy. The precursor load was optimized for [177Lu]Lu-FAPI-46 from 27.0 to 9.7 µg/GBq, for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC from 11 to 10 µg/GBq and for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T from 16.3 to 11.6 µg/GBq. CONCLUSIONS We successfully reduced the precursor load for all three radiopharmaceuticals while maintaining their quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aylin Cankaya
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Balzer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Spreckelmeyer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Graef J, Bluemel S, Brenner W, Amthauer H, Truckenmueller P, Kaul D, Vajkoczy P, Onken JS, Furth C. [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA Therapy as an Individual Treatment Approach for Patients with High-Grade Glioma: Dosimetry Results and Critical Statement. J Nucl Med 2023:jnumed.122.264850. [PMID: 37116918 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The theranostic use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) appears to be promising in patients with high-grade glioma. This study investigated [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy as an individual treatment approach with a focus on intratherapeutic dosimetry. Methods: Three patients were treated with a median of 6.03 GBq (interquartile range [IQR], 5.74-6.10) of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA. Intratherapeutic dosimetry was performed using a hybrid scenario with planar whole-body scintigraphy at 2, 24, and 48 h after treatment injection and SPECT/CT at 48 h after injection. Additive whole-body scintigraphy at 8 d after injection was performed on 1 patient. Results: The median doses were 0.56 Gy (IQR, 0.36-1.25 Gy) to tumor, 0.27 Gy (IQR, 0.16-0.57 Gy) to risk organs, 2.13 Gy (IQR, 1.55-2.89 Gy) to kidneys, and 0.76 Gy (IQR, 0.70-1.20 Gy) to salivary glands. Whole-body exposure was 0.11 Gy (IQR, 0.06-0.18 Gy). Conclusion: Because the intratherapeutic tumor dose is lower than that used in external radiation oncology, the effectiveness of treatment is questionable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefine Graef
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany;
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - David Kaul
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia S Onken
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thiele F, Schau F, Rogasch JMM, Wetz C, Bluemel S, Brenner W, Amthauer H, Lange C, Schatka I. Same same but different: dopamine transporter SPECT on scanners with CZT vs. NaI detectors. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:24. [PMID: 36949290 PMCID: PMC10033816 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00973-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this study were to establish a normal database (NDB) for semiquantification of dopamine transporter (DAT) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with [123I]FP-CIT on a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) camera, test the preexisting NaI-derived NDB for use in CZT scans, and compare the diagnostic findings in subjects imaged with a CZT scanner with either the preexisting NaI-based NDB or our newly defined CZT NDB. METHODS The sample comprised 73 subjects with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndrome (PS) who prospectively underwent [123I]FP-CIT SPECT on a CZT camera according to standard guidelines with identical acquisition and reconstruction protocols (DaTQUANT). Two experienced readers visually assessed the images and binarized the subjects into "non-neurodegenerative PS" and "neurodegenerative PS". Twenty-five subjects from the "non-neurodegenerative PS" subgroup were randomly selected to establish a CZT NDB. The remaining 48 subjects were defined as "test group". DaTQUANT was used to determine the specific binding ratio (SBR). For the test group, SBR values were transformed to z-scores for the putamen utilizing both the CZT NDB and the manufacturer-provided NaI-based NDB (GE NDB). A predefined fixed cut-off of -2 was used for dichotomization of z-scores to classify neurodegenerative and non-neurodegenerative PS. Performance of semiquantification using the two NDB to identify subjects with neurodegenerative PS was assessed in comparison with the visual rating. Furthermore, a randomized head-to-head comparison of both detector systems was performed semiquantitatively in a subset of 32 out of all 73 subjects. RESULTS Compared to the visual rating as reference, semiquantification based on the dedicated CZT NDB led to fewer discordant ratings than the GE NDB in CZT scans (3 vs. 8 out of 48 subjects). This can be attributed to the putaminal z-scores being consistently higher with the GE NDB on a CZT camera (median absolute difference of 1.68), suggesting an optimal cut-off of -0.5 for the GE NDB instead of -2.0. Average binding ratios and z-scores were significantly lower in CZT compared to NaI data. CONCLUSIONS Use of a dedicated, CZT-derived NDB is recommended in [123I]FP-CIT SPECT with a CZT camera since it improves agreement between semiquantification and visual assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Thiele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Franziska Schau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian M M Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Wetz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Catharina Lange
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lüdemann WM, Wieners G, Franz K, Hardt J, Pustelnik D, Böning G, Amthauer H, Gebauer B, Kahn J. MR Imaging Volumetric Response after Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Predictability at Baseline and Correlation with Survival. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34:244-252.e1. [PMID: 36241152 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To prove the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging response as a surrogate end point of treatment efficacy and survival after yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), and to investigate whether outcomes can be predicted at baseline using MR imaging or clinical variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 50 (135) patients with TARE for CRLMs between August 2008 and January 2020 and peri-interventional MR imaging within defined timeframes were included for tumor segmentation. Pretreatment and posttreatment target tumor volumes were measured according to the volumetric Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (vRECIST) and the quantitative European Association for the Study of the Liver (qEASL) criteria. Cox regression models were used to analyze the impact of MR morphologic response, vascularity at baseline, and clinical variables on patient survival. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the predictors of MR morphologic response at baseline. RESULTS The median survival was 337 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 243-431). As opposed to the vRECIST, the application of the qEASL criteria 3 months after the treatment allowed for a significant (P < .05) separation of the survival curves for partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease with a median survival of 412 days (95% CI, 57-767) in responders. High tumor burden and technetium-99m lung shunt significantly decreased the probability of survival. MR morphologic response was not predictable at baseline using imaging or clinical data. CONCLUSIONS MR response according to the qEASL criteria outperformed the vRECIST in measuring the biologic impact of TARE and predicting patient survival. Baseline contrast enhancement did not predict MR response to treatment, which may reflect elevated dose requirements in tumors with a high proportion of viable tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gero Wieners
- Department of Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Franz
- Department of Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Berlin, Germany
| | - Juliane Hardt
- Department of Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Pustelnik
- Department of Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Böning
- Department of Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Kahn
- Department of Radiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gorodetski B, Becker PH, Baur ADJ, Hartenstein A, Rogasch JMM, Furth C, Amthauer H, Hamm B, Makowski M, Penzkofer T. Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning. Eur Radiol Exp 2022; 6:44. [PMID: 36104467 PMCID: PMC9474782 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-022-00296-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We evaluated the role of radiomics applied to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with known lung cancer compared to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT as a reference. Methods This retrospective analysis included 381 patients with 1,799 lymph nodes (450 malignant, 1,349 negative). The data set was divided into a training and validation set. A radiomics analysis with 4 filters and 6 algorithms resulting in 24 different radiomics signatures and a bootstrap algorithm (Bagging) with 30 bootstrap iterations was performed. A decision curve analysis was applied to generate a net benefit to compare the radiomics signature to two expert radiologists as one-by-one and as a prescreening tool in combination with the respective radiologist and only the radiologists. Results All 24 modeling methods showed good and reliable discrimination for malignant/benign LNs (area under the curve 0.75−0.87). The decision curve analysis showed a net benefit for the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) classifier for the entire probability range and outperformed the expert radiologists except for the high probability range. Using the radiomics signature as a prescreening tool for the radiologists did not improve net benefit. Conclusions Radiomics showed good discrimination power irrespective of the modeling technique in detecting LN metastases in patients with known lung cancer. The LASSO classifier was a suitable diagnostic tool and even outperformed the expert radiologists, except for high probabilities. Radiomics failed to improve clinical benefit as a prescreening tool. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00296-8.
Collapse
|
21
|
Truckenmueller P, Graef J, Scheel M, Vajkoczy P, Capper D, Kaul D, Furth C, Amthauer H, Brenner W, Onken JS. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/MRI, histological PSMA expression and preliminary experience with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy in relapsing high-grade glioma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:980058. [PMID: 36119502 PMCID: PMC9478729 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose High-grade gliomas (HGG) are still associated with a dismal prognosis. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is discussed as a theranostic target for PSMA-directed radioligand therapy ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA RLT). Here, we report on the correlation of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA uptake with histological PSMA expression and on our preliminary experience with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RLT in relapsing HGG. Methods Patients with relapsing HGG underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/MRI to evaluate eligibility for an individualized treatment approach with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA. Standard uptake values (SUV) for tumor and liver and respective tumor-to-background ratios (compared to the liver) (TBR) on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/MRI were assessed. Eligibility criteria for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy were exhaustion of all standard treatment options available and TBRmax>1.0. In 11 samples, immunohistochemical PSMA expression was determined, quantified using the H-score and correlated with uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/MRI. Results We included 20 patients with a median age of 53 years (IQR 42-57). The median SUV on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/MRI was 4.5 (3.7-6.2) for SUVmax and 1.4 (1.1-1.7) for SUVmean. The respective TBR was maximum 0.6 (0.4-0.8) and mean 0.3 (0.2-0.4). High TBRmax correlated with increased endothelial PSMA expression [H-score of 65 (62.5-77.5)]. Three patients (15%) presented a TBRmax>1.0 and qualified for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RLT. No treatment related toxicity was observed. Conclusion Only a minority of patients with relapsing HGG qualified for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RLT. Our data demonstrates that PSMA expression in the neo-vasculature corresponds to PSMA uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and might be used as a screening tool for patient selection. Future prospective studies need to focus the debate on TBRmax thresholds as inclusion criteria for PSMA RLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Truckenmueller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josefine Graef
- Department of Nucelar Medicine, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Scheel
- Department of Neuroradiology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Capper
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nucelar Medicine, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nucelar Medicine, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Department of Nucelar Medicine, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Sophie Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- *Correspondence: Julia Sophie Onken,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Öcal O, Schütte K, Zech CJ, Loewe C, van Delden O, Vandecaveye V, Verslype C, Gebauer B, Sengel C, Bargellini I, Iezzi R, Philipp A, Berg T, Klümpen HJ, Benckert J, Pech M, Gasbarrini A, Amthauer H, Bartenstein P, Sangro B, Malfertheiner P, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Addition of Y-90 radioembolization increases tumor response and local disease control in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving sorafenib. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:4716-4726. [PMID: 35916920 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05920-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received sorafenib treatment either alone or combined with radioembolization (RE). METHODS Follow-up images of the patients treated within a multicenter phase II trial (SORAMIC) were assessed by mRECIST. A total of 177 patients (73 combination arm [RE + sorafenib] and 104 sorafenib arm) were included in this post-hoc analysis. Response and progression characteristics were compared between treatment arms. Survival analyses were done to compare PFS and post-progression survival between treatment arms. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to compare survival with factors known to influence PFS in patients with HCC. RESULTS The combination arm had significantly higher objective response rate (61.6% vs. 29.8%, p < 0.001), complete response rate (13.7% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.022), and a trend for higher disease control rate (79.2% vs. 72.1%, p = 0.075). Progression was encountered in 116 (65.5%) patients and was more common in the sorafenib arm (75% vs. 52.0%, p = 0.001). PFS (median 8.9 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.022) and hepatic PFS were significantly better in the combination arm (9.0 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis confirmed the treatment arm as an independent predictor of PFS. CONCLUSION In advanced HCC patients receiving sorafenib, combination with RE has an additive anticancer effect on sorafenib treatment resulting in a higher and longer tumor response. However, the enhanced response did not translate into prolonged survival. Better patient selection and superselective treatment could improve outcomes after combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany.,Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Christoph J Zech
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Loewe
- Section of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Otto van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Chris Verslype
- Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Sengel
- Radiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France
| | - Irene Bargellini
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- UOC di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexander Philipp
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Berg
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Sektion Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Heinz J Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julia Benckert
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zschaeck S, Weingärtner J, Lombardo E, Marschner S, Hajiyianni M, Beck M, Zips D, Li Y, Lin Q, Amthauer H, Troost EGC, van den Hoff J, Budach V, Kotzerke J, Ferentinos K, Karagiannis E, Kaul D, Gregoire V, Holzgreve A, Albert NL, Nikulin P, Bachmann M, Kopka K, Krause M, Baumann M, Kazmierska J, Cegla P, Cholewinski W, Strouthos I, Zöphel K, Majchrzak E, Landry G, Belka C, Stromberger C, Hofheinz F. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography of Head and Neck Cancer: Location and HPV Specific Parameters for Potential Treatment Individualization. Front Oncol 2022; 12:870319. [PMID: 35756665 PMCID: PMC9213669 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.870319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is utilized for staging and treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Some older publications on the prognostic relevance showed inconclusive results, most probably due to small study sizes. This study evaluates the prognostic and potentially predictive value of FDG-PET in a large multi-center analysis. Methods Original analysis of individual FDG-PET and patient data from 16 international centers (8 institutional datasets, 8 public repositories) with 1104 patients. All patients received curative intent radiotherapy/chemoradiation (CRT) and pre-treatment FDG-PET imaging. Primary tumors were semi-automatically delineated for calculation of SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Cox regression analyses were performed for event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), loco-regional control (LRC) and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM). Results FDG-PET parameters were associated with patient outcome in the whole cohort regarding clinical endpoints (EFS, OS, LRC, FFDM), in uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Several previously published cut-off values were successfully validated. Subgroup analyses identified tumor- and human papillomavirus (HPV) specific parameters. In HPV positive oropharynx cancer (OPC) SUVmax was well suited to identify patients with excellent LRC for organ preservation. Patients with SUVmax of 14 or less were unlikely to develop loco-regional recurrence after definitive CRT. In contrast FDG PET parameters deliver only limited prognostic information in laryngeal cancer. Conclusion FDG-PET parameters bear considerable prognostic value in HNSCC and potential predictive value in subgroups of patients, especially regarding treatment de-intensification and organ-preservation. The potential predictive value needs further validation in appropriate control groups. Further research on advanced imaging approaches including radiomics or artificial intelligence methods should implement the identified cut-off values as benchmark routine imaging parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julian Weingärtner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Elia Lombardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marina Hajiyianni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Efstratios Karagiannis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincent Gregoire
- Radiation Oncology Department, Leon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany
| | - Pavel Nikulin
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Bachmann
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joanna Kazmierska
- Electroradiology Department, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.,Radiotherapy Department II, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Paulina Cegla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Witold Cholewinski
- Electroradiology Department, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Ewa Majchrzak
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Peuker CAA, De Bucourt M, Gebauer B, Amthauer H, Erxleben C, Eucker J, Keller U, Leyvraz S, Joussen AM, Keilholz U, Ochsenreither S. First interim analysis of the SirTac trial: A randomized phase II study of SIRT and DSM-TACE in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9511 Background: The liver is the most common site of metastases in patients (pts) with uveal melanoma (UM). Here, we present results from the prespecified first interim analysis of the SirTac trial, a prospective, single-center, randomized, investigator-initiated, open-label phase 2 study of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Yttrium-90-bearing resin microspheres; SIR-Spheres (SIRT) vs Transarterial Chemoembolization with Cisplatin and degradable starch microspheres; EmboCept S (DSM-TACE) in pts with liver-dominant metastatic UM. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed, liver-dominant metastatic UM and ECOG PS 0-2 were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to SIRT or DSM-TACE. Randomization was stratified by lactate dehydrogenase (<2x vs ≥2x upper limit of normal) and pre-treatment with antiangiogenic agents. Extrahepatic metastases were allowed, if asymptomatic. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 108 pts (54 per arm) were planned to be enrolled. Pts received TACE every 4-6 weeks until tumor devascularization or disease progression or intolerable toxicity was observed, and SIRT either as one whole-liver application or in two sequential sessions for each liver lobe. The primary objective of this prespecified analysis was to assess response by RECIST criteria v1.1 in the per-protocol (PP) population of the first 40 pts (20 pts in each arm). Results: Two patients had been treated with previous liver surgery, whereas all other patients had not received previous treatment for metastatic disease. There were no clinicopathological differences between the groups, except for a difference in age (median age SIRT arm 64 y vs 75 y in the TACE arm, p=0.018). All but 1 pt received treatment as randomized. This pt was excluded and replaced by the next TACE pt for this PP interim analysis. There were no differences in best overall response rates between the groups (no complete response, 1 partial response in both arms, stable disease in 19 (95%) and 17 (85%) pts in the SIRT and TACE arm, respectively, and 2 pts with progressive disease in the TACE arm). At a median follow-up of 13.9 mo from treatment start, median PFS in the PP population was 4.9 mo in the SIRT arm vs 2.2 mo in the TACE arm (p=0.037), with a higher median liver-PFS in the SIRT vs TACE arm (8.3 vs 2.2, p=0.026). Conclusions: In this planned interim analysis treatment in both arms was feasible with no differences in response. The explorativePFS analysis allows no conclusions on the final outcome after completion of the trial. The study continues recruitment. Clinical trial information: NCT02936388.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline-Anna Anna Peuker
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maximilian De Bucourt
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Erxleben
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Eucker
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Keller
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Serge Leyvraz
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonia M. Joussen
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Ophthalmology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Keilholz
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ochsenreither
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology; Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mogl MT, Öllinger R, Jann H, Gebauer B, Fehrenbach U, Amthauer H, Wetz C, Schmelzle M, Raschzok N, Krenzien F, Goretzki PE, Pratschke J, Schoening W. Differenzierte Therapiestrategie bei Lebermetastasen gastro-entero-pankreatischer Neuroendokriner Neoplasien. Zentralbl Chir 2022; 147:270-280. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1830-8442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungNeuroendokrine Neoplasien (NEN) bilden eine heterogene Gruppe maligner Tumoren, die überwiegend dem gastro-entero-pankreatischen System (GEP) zuzuordnen sind. Hierbei sind Dünndarm und
Pankreas die häufigsten Organe für Primärtumoren, die Leber stellt den dominanten Metastasierungsort dar. Da viele Patient*innen lange asymptomatisch bleiben, führen oftmals zufällig
diagnostizierte Lebermetastasen oder ein Ileus zur Diagnose. Die einzige kurative Therapieoption stellt die komplette Entfernung von Primarius und Metastasen dar. Besonders im Falle der
metastasierten Erkrankung sollten die vorhandenen Therapieoptionen immer im interdisziplinären Tumorboard mit Spezialisten*innen aus Gastroenterologie, (Leber-)Chirurgie, Radiologie,
Nuklearmedizin, Radiotherapie, Pathologie und Endokrinologie evaluiert werden. Durch die Kombination der verschiedenen Therapieverfahren kann auch für Patient*innen mit fortgeschrittener
Erkrankung eine jahrelange Prognose bei guter Lebensqualität erreicht werden. Wichtig für die Therapieentscheidung sind neben patientenindividuellen Faktoren der Differenzierungsgrad des
Tumors, dessen hormonelle Sekretion, das Metastasierungsmuster und der Erkrankungsverlauf. Die Behandlung von Lebermetastasen umfasst neben den unterschiedlichen chirurgischen Strategien die
lokal-ablativen radiologischen und nuklearmedizinischen Verfahren, die als Ergänzung zu den systemischen Therapien zur Verfügung stehen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina T. Mogl
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Europäisches Metastasenzentrum Charité, Charité Universitätsmedizin-Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Henning Jann
- Medizinische Klinik für Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Christoph Wetz
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Nathanael Raschzok
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Peter E. Goretzki
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Wenzel Schoening
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kleefeld F, Scherret E, Knebel F, Messroghli D, Heidecker B, Wetz C, Schatka I, Barzen G, Tschöpe C, Amthauer H, Hahn K. Same same, but different? The neurological presentation of wildtype transthyretin (ATTRwt) amyloidosis. Amyloid 2022; 29:92-101. [PMID: 34994254 DOI: 10.1080/13506129.2021.2014448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis and wildtype transthyretin (ATTRwt) amyloidosis can be associated with neurological diseases such as carpal tunnel syndrome and polyneuropathy. While ATTRv amyloidosis has been extensively studied, to date little is known about neurological complications of ATTRwt amyloidosis. In particular, the prevalence, pattern and extent of polyneuropathy and autonomic dysfunction has not been adequately investigated in the context of ATTRwt amyloidosis. To tackle this issue, we aimed to characterise the neurological presentation of ATTRwt amyloidosis and to compare between the presentations of ATTRv and ATTRwt amyloidoses. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between November 2019 and September 2020, we included 50 patients with ATTRwt amyloidosis in this cohort study. All patients presented to the amyloidosis centre in Berlin, Germany and underwent neurological, cardiological and radiological work-up including neurological examination, laboratory testing, nerve conduction studies (NCS), echocardiography and scintigraphy. Patients were screened for symptoms of autonomic dysregulation and a subgroup of patients underwent tilt-table testing for orthostatic dysregulation. RESULTS The cohort included 46 men and 4 women; the mean age of the study participants was 80.6 (standard deviation [SD] ± 5.0) years. All patients showed signs of cardiomyopathy on echocardiography. Neurological examination revealed peripheral, symmetric and length-depended predominately sensory polyneuropathy in 74% (n = 37) of patients. Neuropathy impairment scores (NIS) ranged from 0 to 50 with an average score of 8.4 (SD ± 10.1) indicating mild to moderate impairment. 90% and 92% of patients were classified as FAP stage I and PND stage I, respectively. Unilateral or bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) was present in 70% (n = 35) and spinal stenosis was seen in 11% (n = 5) of patients. We detected a low rate of autonomic symptoms with a median COMPASS-31 total score of 18.4 points (IQR 32.4 points). Additional tilt-table testing of a subgroup of 8 patients yielded negative results for orthostatic intolerance. CONCLUSION Distal-symmetric, predominantly sensory polyneuropathy is a common neurological complication in ATTRwt amyloidosis besides carpal tunnel syndrome and spinal stenosis, further substantiating the systemic character of the disease. Compared to ATTRv amyloidosis, the severity of polyneuropathy in ATTRwt amyloidosis is milder and without relevant motor involvement. Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction were not common in this cohort. Nevertheless, ATTRwt amyloidosis is a treatable disease and should be included in the differential diagnosis of sensory polyneuropathy in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Kleefeld
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Klinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Elise Scherret
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Klinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Knebel
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Angiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Germany.,Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Messroghli
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin (DHZB), Germany
| | - Bettina Heidecker
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Medizinische Klinik für Kardiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Germany
| | - Christoph Wetz
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Gina Barzen
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Angiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Germany
| | - Carsten Tschöpe
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Medizinische Klinik für Kardiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charite; BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Katrin Hahn
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.,Klinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lodrini M, Graef J, Thole-Kliesch TM, Astrahantseff K, Sprüssel A, Grimaldi M, Peitz C, Linke RB, Hollander JF, Lankes E, Künkele A, Oevermann L, Schwabe G, Fuchs J, Szymansky A, Schulte JH, Hundsdörfer P, Eckert C, Amthauer H, Eggert A, Deubzer HE. Targeted Analysis of Cell-free Circulating Tumor DNA is Suitable for Early Relapse and Actionable Target Detection in Patients with Neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1809-1820. [PMID: 35247920 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treating refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma remains challenging. Monitoring body fluids for tumor-derived molecular information indicating minimal residual disease supports more frequent diagnostic surveillance and may have the power to detect resistant subclones before they give rise to relapses. If actionable targets are identified from liquid biopsies, targeted treatment options can be considered earlier. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Droplet digital PCR assays assessing MYCN and ALK copy numbers and allelic frequencies of ALK p.F1174L and ALK p.R1275Q mutations were applied to longitudinally collected liquid biopsies and matched tumor tissue samples from 31 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels and marker detection were compared with data from routine clinical diagnostics. RESULTS Total cfDNA concentrations in blood plasma from patients with high-risk neuroblastoma were higher than in healthy controls and consistently correlated with neuron-specific enolase levels and lactate dehydrogenase activity but not with 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine scores at relapse diagnosis. Targeted cfDNA diagnostics proved superior for early relapse detection to all current diagnostics in 2 patients. Marker analysis in cfDNA indicated intratumor heterogeneity for cell clones harboring MYCN amplifications and druggable ALK alterations that were not detectable in matched tumor tissue samples in 17 patients from our cohort. Proof of concept is provided for molecular target detection in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with isolated central nervous system relapses. CONCLUSIONS Tumor-specific alterations can be identified and monitored during disease course in liquid biopsies from pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. This approach to cfDNA surveillance warrants further prospective validation and exploitation for diagnostic purposes and to guide therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Lodrini
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC) of the Charité and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josefine Graef
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Theresa M Thole-Kliesch
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathy Astrahantseff
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Sprüssel
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maddalena Grimaldi
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC) of the Charité and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Constantin Peitz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC) of the Charité and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rasmus B Linke
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC) of the Charité and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan F Hollander
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC) of the Charité and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Erwin Lankes
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Center for Chronically Sick Children, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annette Künkele
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Lena Oevermann
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Schwabe
- Children's Hospital, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Jörg Fuchs
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Annabell Szymansky
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes H Schulte
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Hundsdörfer
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cornelia Eckert
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Angelika Eggert
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hedwig E Deubzer
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC) of the Charité and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zschaeck S, Andela SB, Amthauer H, Furth C, Rogasch JM, Beck M, Hofheinz F, Huang K. Correlation Between Quantitative PSMA PET Parameters and Clinical Risk Factors in Non-Metastatic Primary Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:879089. [PMID: 35530334 PMCID: PMC9074726 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.879089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PSMA PET is frequently used for staging of prostate cancer patients. Furthermore, there is increasing interest to use PET information for personalized local treatment approaches in surgery and radiotherapy, especially for focal treatment strategies. However, it is not well established which quantitative imaging parameters show highest correlation with clinical and histological tumor aggressiveness. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of 135 consecutive patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer and PSMA PET before any treatment. Clinical risk parameters (PSA values, Gleason score and D'Amico risk group) were correlated with quantitative PET parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), tumor asphericity (ASP) and PSMA tumor volume (PSMA-TV). Results Most of the investigated imaging parameters were highly correlated with each other (correlation coefficients between 0.20 and 0.95). A low to moderate, however significant, correlation of imaging parameters with PSA values (0.19 to 0.45) and with Gleason scores (0.17 to 0.31) was observed for all parameters except ASP which did not show a significant correlation with Gleason score. Receiver operating characteristics for the detection of D'Amico high-risk patients showed poor to fair sensitivity and specificity for all investigated quantitative PSMA PET parameters (Areas under the curve (AUC) between 0.63 and 0.73). Comparison of AUC between quantitative PET parameters by DeLong test showed significant superiority of SUVmax compared to SUVmean for the detection of high-risk patients. None of the investigated imaging parameters significantly outperformed SUVmax. Conclusion Our data confirm prior publications with lower number of patients that reported moderate correlations of PSMA PET parameters with clinical risk factors. With the important limitation that Gleason scores were only biopsy-derived in this study, there is no indication that the investigated additional parameters deliver superior information compared to SUVmax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bela Andela
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian M. Rogasch
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Galler M, Rogasch JMM, Huang K, Jann H, Plehm K, Wetz C, Amthauer H. Prognostic Value of the Largest Lesion Size for Progression-Free Survival in Patients with NET Undergoing Salvage PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071768. [PMID: 35406540 PMCID: PMC8996884 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using radionuclide-labeled somatostatin analogues is based on the overexpression of somatostatin receptors on neuroendocrine tumors and is shown to have a good safety profile and efficacy in different types of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. As this therapy is usually not curative, most patients experience disease progression after initial PRRT. In these cases, retreatment with PRRT, also called salvage PRRT, can be a treatment option, but little is known about the efficacy and possible risk factors. In this retrospective study that included 32 patients, we found that the size of the largest lesion is a significant predictor of disease progression after salvage PRRT. This risk factor is easy to obtain and can help identify patients who may benefit from intensified follow-up strategies. Abstract (1) Background: retreatment with radionuclide-labeled somatostatin analogues following disease progression after initial treatment cycles is often referred to as salvage peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (salvage PRRT). Salvage PRRT is shown to have a favorable safety profile in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but numerous questions about the efficacy and prognostic or predictive factors remain to be answered. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two parameters that have shown prognostic significance in progression-free survival (PFS) in initial PRRT treatment, namely the size of the largest lesion (LLS) and the De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT)), as prognostic factors in the context of salvage PRRT. In addition, the PFS after initial PRRT was evaluated as a predictor of the PFS following salvage PRRT. (2) Methods: retrospective, monocentric analysis in 32 patients with NETs (gastroenteropancreatic, 23; unknown primary, 7; kidney, 1; lung, 1) and progression after initial PRRT undergoing retreatment with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC. The prognostic values of LLS, the De Ritis ratio, and PFS after initial treatment cycles regarding PFS following salvage PRRT were evaluated with univariable and multivariable Cox regression. PFS was defined as the time from treatment start until tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, death from any cause or start of a new treatment due to progression of cancer-related symptoms (namely carcinoid syndrome). (3) Results: progression after salvage PRRT was observed in 29 of 32 patients with median PFS of 10.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.0–15.9 months). A higher LLS (hazard ratio (HR): 1.03; p = 0.002) and a higher De Ritis ratio (HR: 2.64; p = 0.047) were associated with shorter PFS after salvage PRRT in univariable Cox regression. PFS after initial PRRT was not associated with PFS following salvage PRRT. In multivariable Cox regression, only LLS remained a significant predictor. (4) Conclusions: the size of the largest lesion is easy to obtain and might help identify patients at risk of early disease progression after salvage PRRT. Validation is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Galler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.M.M.R.); (K.H.); (C.W.); (H.A.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Julian M. M. Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.M.M.R.); (K.H.); (C.W.); (H.A.)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.M.M.R.); (K.H.); (C.W.); (H.A.)
| | - Henning Jann
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (H.J.); (K.P.)
| | - Kristina Plehm
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (H.J.); (K.P.)
| | - Christoph Wetz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.M.M.R.); (K.H.); (C.W.); (H.A.)
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.M.M.R.); (K.H.); (C.W.); (H.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schatka I, Bingel A, Schau F, Bluemel S, Messroghli DR, Frumkin D, Knebel F, Diekmann SM, Elsanhoury A, Tschöpe C, Hahn K, Amthauer H, Rogasch JMM, Wetz C. An optimized imaging protocol for [ 99mTc]Tc-DPD scintigraphy and SPECT/CT quantification in cardiac transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis. J Nucl Cardiol 2021; 28:2483-2496. [PMID: 34331215 PMCID: PMC8709821 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-021-02715-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In [99mTc]Tc-DPD scintigraphy for myocardial ATTR amyloidosis, planar images 3 hour p.i. and SPECT/CT acquisition in L-mode are recommended. This study investigated if earlier planar images (1 hour p.i.) are beneficial and if SPECT/CT acquisition should be preferred in H-mode (180° detector angle) or L-mode (90°). METHODS In SPECT/CT phantom measurements (NaI cameras, N = 2; CZT, N = 1), peak contrast recovery (CRpeak) was derived from sphere inserts or myocardial insert (cardiac phantom; signal-to-background ratio [SBR], 10:1 or 5:1). In 25 positive and 38 negative patients (reference: endomyocardial biopsy or clinical diagnosis), Perugini scores and heart-to-contralateral (H/CL) count ratios were derived from planar images 1 hour and 3 hour p.i. RESULTS In phantom measurements, accuracy of myocardial CRpeak at SBR 10:1 (H-mode, 0.95-0.99) and reproducibility at 5:1 (H-mode, 1.02-1.14) was comparable for H-mode and L-mode. However, L-mode showed higher variability of background counts and sphere CRpeak throughout the field of view than H-mode. In patients, sensitivity/specificity were ≥ 95% for H/CL ratios at both time points and visual scoring 3 hour. At 1 hour, visual scores showed specificity of 89% and reduced reader's confidence. CONCLUSIONS Early DPD images provided no additional value for visual scoring or H/CL ratios. In SPECT/CT, H-mode is preferred over L-mode, especially if quantification is applied apart from the myocardium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Bingel
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franziska Schau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel R Messroghli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Frumkin
- Medical Clinic for Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Knebel
- Medical Clinic for Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja M Diekmann
- Department of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Ahmed Elsanhoury
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Berlin-Brandenburger Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Tschöpe
- Department of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Berlin-Brandenburger Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katrin Hahn
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian M M Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christoph Wetz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ricke J, Schinner R, Seidensticker M, Gasbarrini A, van Delden OM, Amthauer H, Peynircioglu B, Bargellini I, Iezzi R, De Toni EN, Malfertheiner P, Pech M, Sangro B. Liver function after combined selective internal radiation therapy or sorafenib monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2021; 75:1387-1396. [PMID: 34454995 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS SORAMIC is a previously published randomised controlled trial assessing survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received sorafenib with or without selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Based on the per-protocol (PP) population, we assessed whether the outcome of patients receiving SIRT+sorafenib vs. sorafenib alone was affected by adverse effects of SIRT on liver function. METHODS The PP population consisted of 109 (SIRT+sorafenib) vs. 173 patients (sorafenib alone). Comparisons were made between subgroups who achieved a significant survival benefit or trend towards improved survival with SIRT and the inverse group without a survival benefit: <65 years-old vs. ≥65 years-old, Child-Pugh 5 vs. 6, no transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) vs. prior TACE, no cirrhosis vs. cirrhosis, non-alcohol- vs. alcohol-related aetiology. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was used to monitor liver function over time during follow-up. RESULTS ALBI scores increased in all patient groups during follow-up. In the PP population, ALBI score increases were higher in the SIRT+sorafenib than the sorafenib arm (p = 0.0021 month 4, p <0.0001 from month 6). SIRT+sorafenib conferred a survival benefit compared to sorafenib alone in patients aged <65 years-old, those without cirrhosis, those with Child-Pugh 5, and those who had not received TACE. A higher increase in ALBI score was observed in the inverse subgroups in whom survival was not improved by adding SIRT (age ≥65 years-old, p <0.05; cirrhosis, p = 0.07; Child-Pugh 6, p <0.05; prior TACE, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION SIRT frequently has a negative, often subclinical, effect on liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, which may impair prognosis after treatment. Careful patient selection for SIRT as well as prevention of clinical and subclinical liver damage by selective treatments, high tumour uptake ratio, and medical prophylaxis could translate into better efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645 LAY SUMMARY: This study of treatments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma found that selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has an adverse effect on liver function that may affect patient outcomes. Patients should be carefully selected before they undergo SIRT and the treatment technique should be optimised for maximum protection of non-target liver parenchyma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany.
| | - Regina Schinner
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Medicina interna e gastroenterologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Irene Bargellini
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Department of Radiology and Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Garlipp B, Amthauer H, Kupitz D, Grosser OS, Jürgens J, Damm R, Powerski M, Fabritius M, Oecal O, Stuebs P, Benckert C, Seidensticker R, Ricke J, Pech M, Seidensticker M. The Impact of Unilateral 90Y-radioembolization on Functional Changes in the Contralateral Hepatic Lobe: The Prospective, Open-label RadioEmbolization, Volumetry, and Liver FuncTion Measurements (REVoluTion) Study. Ann Surg Open 2021; 2:e095. [PMID: 37635822 PMCID: PMC10455191 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To investigate how metabolic function of the contralateral liver lobe is affected by unilateral radioembolization (RE), and to compare the changes in volume and metabolic function. Background Unilateral RE induces contralateral liver hypertrophy, but it is unknown if metabolic liver function improves in line with volume increases. Methods This prospective open-label, nonrandomized, therapy-optimizing study included all consecutive patients undergoing right-sided or sequential 90Y-RE for liver malignancies without underlying liver disease or biliary obstruction at a single center in Germany. Magnetic resonance imaging volumetry and hepatobiliary scintigraphy were performed immediately before RE and approximately 6 weeks after RE. Results Twenty-three patients were evaluated (11 metastatic colorectal cancer, 4 cholangiocellular carcinoma, 3 metastatic breast cancer, 1 each of metastatic neuroendocrine tumor, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, oesophageal cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma). In the untreated contralateral left liver lobe, mean (SD) metabolic function significantly increased from 1.34 (0.76) %/min/m2 at baseline to 1.56 (0.75) %/min/m2 6 weeks after RE (P = 0.024). The mean (SD) functional volume (liver volume minus tumor volume) of the left liver lobe significantly increased from baseline (407.3 [170.3] mL) to follow-up (499.1 [209.8] mL; P < 0.01), with an equivalent magnitude to the metabolic function increase. There were no reports of grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusion This study indicates that unilobar RE produces a significant increase in the metabolic function, and equivalent volume increase, of the contralateral lobe. RE may be a useful option to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before surgical resection of primary or secondary liver malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Garlipp
- From the General Surgery, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dennis Kupitz
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Oliver S. Grosser
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Julian Jürgens
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert Damm
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Fabritius
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Osman Oecal
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Patrick Stuebs
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Minimalinvasive Chirurgie, DRK Kliniken Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Benckert
- Allgemein-und Viszeralchirurgie, Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kupitz D, Wissel H, Wuestemann J, Bluemel S, Pech M, Amthauer H, Kreissl MC, Grosser OS. Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECT. EJNMMI Phys 2021; 8:57. [PMID: 34328565 PMCID: PMC8324619 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00405-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The introduction of hybrid SPECT/CT devices enables quantitative imaging in SPECT, providing a methodological setup for quantitation using SPECT tracers comparable to PET/CT. We evaluated a specific quantitative reconstruction algorithm for SPECT data using a 99mTc-filled NEMA phantom. Quantitative and qualitative image parameters were evaluated for different parametrizations of the acquisition and reconstruction protocol to identify an optimized quantitative protocol. Results The reconstructed activity concentration (ACrec) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of all examined protocols (n = 16) were significantly affected by the parametrization of the weighting factor k used in scatter correction, the total number of iterations and the sphere volume (all, p < 0.0001). The two examined SPECT acquisition protocols (with 60 or 120 projections) had a minor impact on the ACrec and no significant impact on the SNR. In comparison to the known AC, the use of default scatter correction (k = 0.47) or object-specific scatter correction (k = 0.18) resulted in an underestimation of ACrec in the largest sphere volume (26.5 ml) by − 13.9 kBq/ml (− 16.3%) and − 7.1 kBq/ml (− 8.4%), respectively. An increase in total iterations leads to an increase in estimated AC and a decrease in SNR. The mean difference between ACrec and known AC decreased with an increasing number of total iterations (e.g., for 20 iterations (2 iterations/10 subsets) = − 14.6 kBq/ml (− 17.1%), 240 iterations (24i/10s) = − 8.0 kBq/ml (− 9.4%), p < 0.0001). In parallel, the mean SNR decreased significantly from 2i/10s to 24i/10s by 76% (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Quantitative SPECT imaging is feasible with the used reconstruction algorithm and hybrid SPECT/CT, and its consistent implementation in diagnostics may provide perspectives for quantification in routine clinical practice (e.g., assessment of bone metabolism). When combining quantitative analysis and diagnostic imaging, we recommend using two different reconstruction protocols with task-specific optimized setups (quantitative vs. qualitative reconstruction). Furthermore, individual scatter correction significantly improves both quantitative and qualitative results. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-021-00405-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Kupitz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Heiko Wissel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jan Wuestemann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael C Kreissl
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Oliver S Grosser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schatka I, Tschernig M, Rogasch JMM, Bluemel S, Graef J, Furth C, Sehouli J, Blohmer JU, Gebauer B, Fehrenbach U, Amthauer H. Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Outcome Assessment Applying a Prognostic Score. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153777. [PMID: 34359677 PMCID: PMC8345060 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a therapy option in patients with breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM). This analysis aimed at identifying a prognostic score regarding overall survival (OS) after SIRT using routine pretherapeutic parameters. Retrospective analysis of 38 patients (age, 59 (39-84) years) with BCLM and 42 SIRT procedures. Cox regression for OS included clinical factors (age, ECOG and prior treatments), laboratory parameters, hepatic tumor load and dose reduction due to hepatopulmonary shunt. Elevated baseline ALT and/or AST was present if CTCAE grade ≥ 2 was fulfilled (>3 times the upper limit of normal). Median OS after SIRT was 6.4 months. In univariable Cox, ECOG ≥ 1 (hazard ratio (HR), 3.8), presence of elevated baseline ALT/AST (HR, 3.8), prior liver surgery (HR, 10.2), and dose reduction of 40% (HR, 8.1) predicted shorter OS (each p < 0.05). Multivariable Cox confirmed ECOG ≥ 1 (HR, 2.34; p = 0.012) and elevated baseline ALT/AST (HR, 4.16; p < 0.001). Combining both factors, median OS decreased from 19.2 months (0 risk factors; n = 14 procedures) to 5.9 months (1 factor; n = 20) or 2.2 months (2 factors; n = 8; p < 0.001). The proposed score may facilitate pretherapeutic identification of patients with unfavorable OS after SIRT. This may help to balance potential life prolongation with the hazards of invasive treatment and hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)30-450-627-045
| | - Monique Tschernig
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Julian M. M. Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Josefine Graef
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.S.); (J.-U.B.)
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (J.S.); (J.-U.B.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (B.G.); (U.F.)
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (B.G.); (U.F.)
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.T.); (J.M.M.R.); (S.B.); (J.G.); (C.F.); (H.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kleefeld F, Knebel F, Eurich D, Schatka I, Blüthner E, Schönfeld S, Amthauer H, Hahn K. Familial Oculo-Leptomeningeal Transthyretin Amyloidosis Caused by Leu55Arg Mutation. J Neuromuscul Dis 2021; 7:515-519. [PMID: 32741838 DOI: 10.3233/jnd-200542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hATTR amyloidosis) is a multisystemic disease usually presenting in a mixed neurological and cardiological phenotype. We present a case of hATTR amyloidosis associated with Leu55Arg mutation causing a form of familial oculo-leptomeningeal amyloidosis. Two brothers and their mother presented with severe autonomic neuropathy, loss of visual acuity and lepto-meningeal involvement. One patient suffered subarachnoid hemorrhage as a possible complication of cerebral involvement. The patients suffered from treatment-refractory weight loss and recurring vitreous opacities. RNA interference-based treatment has led to stabilization of autonomic and peripheral neuropathy but has had no effect on ocular symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Kleefeld
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlininstitution>, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Knebel
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlininstitution>, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dennis Eurich
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlininstitution>, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlininstitution>, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Blüthner
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlininstitution>, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Shideh Schönfeld
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlininstitution>, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlininstitution>, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katrin Hahn
- Amyloidosis Center Charité Berlin (ACCB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlininstitution>, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rogasch JMM, Frost N, Bluemel S, Michaels L, Penzkofer T, von Laffert M, Temmesfeld-Wollbrück B, Neudecker J, Rückert JC, Ochsenreither S, Böhmer D, Amthauer H, Furth C. FDG-PET/CT for pretherapeutic lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer: A tailored approach to the ESTS/ESMO guideline workflow. Lung Cancer 2021; 157:66-74. [PMID: 33994197 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In patients with NSCLC, current ESTS and ESMO guidelines recommend invasive lymph node (LN) staging with EBUS-TBNA even if FDG-PET/CT is negative for mediastinal LNs if at least one of three risk factors is present (cN1, non-peripheral primary or primary >3 cm). Modified workflows to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Monocentric retrospective analysis of pretherapeutic FDG-PET/CT in 247 patients with NSCLC (62 % male; age, 68 [43-88] years) using an analog or digital PET/CT scanner. PET windowing was standardized. LNs were positive if 'LN uptake > mediastinal blood pool' or short axis >10 mm. Surgery or EBUS-TBNA served as reference for diagnostic accuracy per LN station. In all patients with negative mediastinal LNs by PET/CT, LN histology from surgery was available. RESULTS Among 700 L N stations analyzed, 180 were malignant. Sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT per LN station were 93 % and 71 %. Following current guidelines, 76 patients with mediastinal negative PET/CT required confirmatory invasive staging. Only 5/76 patients had unexpected pN2 (all had adenocarcinoma). In a modified approach, confirmatory invasive staging was confined to patients with mediastinal negative PET/CT who showed all three risk factors. Using this modification, EBUS-TBNA could have been omitted in 62 (82 %) of the 76 patients who required EBUS-TBNA based on current recommendation. Among these 62 patients, only one patient had unsuspected pN2 (single-level) while the remaining 61 of 62 omitted EBUS-TBNA were deemed unnecessary because mediastinal LNs were confirmed to be negative. No multi-level pN2 would have been missed. CONCLUSION In the current analysis, 82 % of EBUS-TBNA procedures in patients with mediastinal negative PET/CT could have been omitted by modifying the current guideline workflow as proposed (i.e., restricting EBUS-TBNA in patients with cN0/1 to those with all three risk factors). This was consistent with different PET/CT scanners. Prospective confirmation is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian M M Rogasch
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Nikolaj Frost
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Liza Michaels
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Tobias Penzkofer
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Maximilian von Laffert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Bettina Temmesfeld-Wollbrück
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jens Neudecker
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jens-Carsten Rückert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Ochsenreither
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charitéplatz 1, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Dirk Böhmer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christian Furth
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Öcal O, Kupčinskas J, Morkunas E, Amthauer H, Schütte K, Malfertheiner P, Klümpen HJ, Sengel C, Benckert J, Seidensticker R, Sangro B, Wildgruber M, Pech M, Bartenstein P, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Prognostic value of baseline interleukin 6 levels in liver decompensation and survival in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:51. [PMID: 34080071 PMCID: PMC8172845 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00791-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To confirm the prognostic value of previously published baseline interleukin 6 (IL6) and IL8 cutoff values in survival and liver dysfunction in patients with advanced HCC undergoing 90Y radioembolization. Methods A total of 83 patients (77 male) represented a subset of HCC patients undergoing 90Y radioembolization combined with sorafenib as part of the prospective multicenter phase II trial SORAMIC. IL6 and IL8 levels were determined in serum samples collected at baseline. In this post hoc analysis, we sought to confirm the prognostic value of baseline cutoff values of 6.53 pg/mL and 60.8 pg/mL for IL6 and IL8, respectively, in overall survival (OS) or liver dysfunction (grade 2 bilirubin increase) after treatment. Results Median OS was 12.0 months. While low baseline albumin and high bilirubin values were associated with high IL6, liver cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease, and portal vein infiltration were associated with high IL8. In univariate analysis, high baseline IL6 and IL8 were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (7.8 vs. 19.0 months for IL6 and 8.4 vs. 16.0 months for IL8). In addition to IL values, liver cirrhosis, Child–Pugh grade, baseline albumin (< 36 g/dL), and total bilirubin (≥ 17 µmol/L), and higher mALBI grade (2b &3) values were associated with OS. At multivariate analysis, high baseline IL6 was the only independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 2.35 [1.35–4.1], p = 0.002). Risk factors for liver dysfunction were high baseline IL6, albumin, and total bilirubin, and mALBI grade as found in univariate analysis. High baseline IL6 (HR 2.67 [1.21–5.94], p = 0.016) and total bilirubin ≥ 17 µmol/L (HR 3.73 [1.72–8.06], p < 0.001) were independently associated with liver dysfunction. Conclusion In advanced HCC patients receiving 90Y radioembolization combined with sorafenib, baseline IL6 values proved to be prognostic, confirming previous findings in patients undergoing 90Yradioembolization. IL6 might be useful for patient selection or stratification in future trials. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00791-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Juozas Kupčinskas
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Egidijus Morkunas
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Heinz Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Sengel
- Radiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France
| | - Julia Benckert
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fehrenbach U, Xin S, Hartenstein A, Auer TA, Dräger F, Froböse K, Jann H, Mogl M, Amthauer H, Geisel D, Denecke T, Wiedenmann B, Penzkofer T. Automatized Hepatic Tumor Volume Analysis of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases by Gd-EOB MRI-A Deep-Learning Model to Support Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Decision-Making. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2726. [PMID: 34072865 PMCID: PMC8199286 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid quantification of liver metastasis for diagnosis and follow-up is an unmet medical need in patients with secondary liver malignancies. We present a 3D-quantification model of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) using gadoxetic-acid (Gd-EOB)-enhanced MRI as a useful tool for multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCC). METHODS Manual 3D-segmentations of NELM and livers (149 patients in 278 Gd-EOB MRI scans) were used to train a neural network (U-Net architecture). Clinical usefulness was evaluated in another 33 patients who were discussed in our MCC and received a Gd-EOB MRI both at baseline and follow-up examination (n = 66) over 12 months. Model measurements (NELM volume; hepatic tumor load (HTL)) with corresponding absolute (ΔabsNELM; ΔabsHTL) and relative changes (ΔrelNELM; ΔrelHTL) between baseline and follow-up were compared to MCC decisions (therapy success/failure). RESULTS Internal validation of the model's accuracy showed a high overlap for NELM and livers (Matthew's correlation coefficient (φ): 0.76/0.95, respectively) with higher φ in larger NELM volume (φ = 0.80 vs. 0.71; p = 0.003). External validation confirmed the high accuracy for NELM (φ = 0.86) and livers (φ = 0.96). MCC decisions were significantly differentiated by all response variables (ΔabsNELM; ΔabsHTL; ΔrelNELM; ΔrelHTL) (p < 0.001). ΔrelNELM and ΔrelHTL showed optimal discrimination between therapy success or failure (AUC: 1.000; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The model shows high accuracy in 3D-quantification of NELM and HTL in Gd-EOB-MRI. The model's measurements correlated well with MCC's evaluation of therapeutic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uli Fehrenbach
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.H.); (T.A.A.); (F.D.); (K.F.); (D.G.); (T.P.)
| | - Siyi Xin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical Department, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.X.); (H.J.); (B.W.)
| | - Alexander Hartenstein
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.H.); (T.A.A.); (F.D.); (K.F.); (D.G.); (T.P.)
- Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Timo Alexander Auer
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.H.); (T.A.A.); (F.D.); (K.F.); (D.G.); (T.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Franziska Dräger
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.H.); (T.A.A.); (F.D.); (K.F.); (D.G.); (T.P.)
| | - Konrad Froböse
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.H.); (T.A.A.); (F.D.); (K.F.); (D.G.); (T.P.)
| | - Henning Jann
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical Department, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.X.); (H.J.); (B.W.)
| | - Martina Mogl
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Dominik Geisel
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.H.); (T.A.A.); (F.D.); (K.F.); (D.G.); (T.P.)
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Bertram Wiedenmann
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical Department, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (S.X.); (H.J.); (B.W.)
| | - Tobias Penzkofer
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.H.); (T.A.A.); (F.D.); (K.F.); (D.G.); (T.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Seidensticker M, Fabritius MP, Beller J, Seidensticker R, Todica A, Ilhan H, Pech M, Heinze C, Powerski M, Damm R, Weiss A, Rueckel J, Omari J, Amthauer H, Ricke J. Impact of Pharmaceutical Prophylaxis on Radiation-Induced Liver Disease Following Radioembolization. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13091992. [PMID: 33919073 PMCID: PMC8122451 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13091992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radioembolization has failed to prove survival benefit in randomized trials, and, depending on various factors including tumor biology, response rates may vary considerably. Studies showed positive correlations between survival and absorbed tumor dose. Therefore, increasing currently prescribed tumor doses may be favorable for improving patient outcomes. The dominant limiting factor for increasing RE dose prescriptions is the relatively low tolerance of liver parenchyma to radiation with the possible consequence of a radiation-induced liver disease. Advances in RILD prevention may help increasing tolerable radiation doses to improve patient outcomes. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-therapeutic RILD-prophylaxis in a cohort of intensely pretreated liver metastatic breast cancer patients. The results of this study as well as pathophysiological considerations warrant further investigations of RILD prophylaxis to increase dose prescriptions in radioembolization. Abstract Background: Radioembolization (RE) with yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres yields heterogeneous response rates in with primary or secondary liver cancer. Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) is a potentially life-threatening complication with higher prevalence in cirrhotics or patients exposed to previous chemotherapies. Advances in RILD prevention may help increasing tolerable radiation doses to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-therapeutic RILD-prophylaxis in a cohort of intensely pretreated liver metastatic breast cancer patients; Methods: Ninety-three patients with liver metastases of breast cancer received RE between 2007 and 2016. All Patients received RILD prophylaxis for 8 weeks post-RE. From January 2014, RILD prophylaxis was changed from ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and prednisolone (standard prophylaxis [SP]; n = 59) to pentoxifylline (PTX), UDCA and low-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (modified prophylaxis (MP); n = 34). The primary endpoint was toxicity including symptoms of RILD; Results: Dose exposure of normal liver parenchyma was higher in the modified vs. standard prophylaxis group (47.2 Gy (17.8–86.8) vs. 40.2 Gy (12.5–83.5), p = 0.017). All grade RILD events (mild: bilirubin ≥ 21 µmol/L (but <30 μmol/L); severe: (bilirubin ≥ 30 µmol/L and ascites)) were observed more frequently in the SP group than in the MP group, albeit without significance (7/59 vs. 1/34; p = 0.140). Severe RILD occurred in the SP group only (n = 2; p > 0.1). ALBI grade increased in 16.7% patients in the MP and in 27.1% patients in the SP group, respectively (group difference not significant); Conclusions: At established dose levels, mild or severe RILD events proved rare in our cohort. RILD prophylaxis with PTX, UDCA and LMWH appears to have an independent positive impact on OS in patients with metastatic breast cancer and may reduce the frequency and severity of RILD. Results of this study as well as pathophysiological considerations warrant further investigations of RILD prophylaxis presumably targeting combinations of anticoagulation (MP) and antiinflammation (SP) to increase dose prescriptions in radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (M.P.F.)
| | - Matthias Philipp Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (M.P.F.)
| | - Jannik Beller
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.T.); (H.I.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.T.); (H.I.)
| | - Maciej Pech
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Constanze Heinze
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Robert Damm
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Alexander Weiss
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Johannes Rueckel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
| | - Jazan Omari
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (J.B.); (M.P.); (C.H.); (M.P.); (R.D.); (A.W.); (J.O.)
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (R.S.); (J.R.); (J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Verburg FA, Amthauer H, Binse I, Brink I, Buck A, Darr A, Dierks C, Koch C, König U, Kreissl MC, Luster M, Reuter C, Scheidhauer K, Willenberg HS, Zielke A, Schott M. Questions and Controversies in the Clinical Application of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Expert Perspectives. Horm Metab Res 2021; 53:149-160. [PMID: 33652491 PMCID: PMC7932822 DOI: 10.1055/a-1380-4154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Notwithstanding regulatory approval of lenvatinib and sorafenib to treat radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (RAI-R DTC), important questions and controversies persist regarding this use of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RAI-R DTC experts from German tertiary referral centers convened to identify and explore such issues; this paper summarizes their discussions. One challenge is determining when to start TKI therapy. Decision-making should be shared between patients and multidisciplinary caregivers, and should consider tumor size/burden, growth rate, and site(s), the key drivers of RAI-R DTC morbidity and mortality, along with current and projected tumor-related symptomatology, co-morbidities, and performance status. Another question involves choice of first-line TKIs. Currently, lenvatinib is generally preferred, due to greater increase in progression-free survival versus placebo treatment and higher response rate in its pivotal trial versus that of sorafenib; additionally, in those studies, lenvatinib but not sorafenib showed overall survival benefit in subgroup analysis. Whether recommended maximum or lower TKI starting doses better balance anti-tumor effects versus tolerability is also unresolved. Exploratory analyses of lenvatinib pivotal study data suggest dose-response effects, possibly favoring higher dosing; however, results are awaited of a prospective comparison of lenvatinib starting regimens. Some controversy surrounds determination of net therapeutic benefit, the key criterion for continuing TKI therapy: if tolerability is acceptable, overall disease control may justify further treatment despite limited but manageable progression. Future research should assess potential guideposts for starting TKIs; fine-tune dosing strategies and further characterize antitumor efficacy; and evaluate interventions to prevent and/or treat TKI toxicity, particularly palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik A. Verburg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg,
Germany
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence Frederik A. Verburg M.D., PhD. Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineErasmus Medical CenterDoctor Molewaterplein 403015 GD RotterdamThe Netherlands+31 10 704 0 704
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie
Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin
Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Berlin,
Germany
| | - Ina Binse
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen,
Germany
| | - Ingo Brink
- Department of Medical Diagnostics and Therapy, Ernst von Bergmann
Hospital Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg,
Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Darr
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Jena,
Germany
| | - Christine Dierks
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg,
Germany
| | - Christine Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endocrinology,
University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Ute König
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, University of
Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Michael C. Kreissl
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg,
Germany
| | - Markus Luster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg,
Germany
| | - Christoph Reuter
- Department of Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover,
Germany
| | - Klemens Scheidhauer
- Interdisclipinary Endocrine Center, Technical University of Munich,
Munich, Germany
| | - Holger Sven Willenberg
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of
Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Andreas Zielke
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Diakonie Klinikum Stuttgart,
Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Matthias Schott
- Division of Endocrinology, University Hospital Düsseldorf,
Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Huang K, Schatka I, Rogasch JMM, Lindquist RL, De Santis M, Erber B, Radojewski P, Brenner W, Amthauer H. Explorative analysis of a score predicting the therapy response of patients with metastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing radioligand therapy with 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen. Ann Nucl Med 2020; 35:314-320. [PMID: 33351172 PMCID: PMC7902572 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01567-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Objective Up to 60% of patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with 177Lu prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) achieves a partial biochemical response with a decrease of > 50% in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The remaining fractions, however, do not respond to RLT. The aim of this explorative analysis was to identify pre-therapeutic factors for the prediction of response. Methods 46 patients [age = 68 years (50–87)] with mCRPC who consecutively underwent RLT with 177Lu PSMA [median applied activity = 6 GBq (2.9–6.2)] were included and analysed retrospectively. The association of different clinical and laboratory factors and parameters from pre-therapeutic 68Ga PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) with the outcome of RLT was tested (Fisher’s test). Outcome was defined as PSA changes 8 weeks after second RLT [partial response (PR), PSA decrease > 50%; progressive disease (PD), PSA increase ≥ 25%; stable disease (SD), others]. Significant predictive factors were combined in a predictive score. Results 30% showed a post-treatment PR (median 73% PSA decrease), 35% SD (median 17% PSA decrease) and 35% PD (median 42% PSA increase). Significant predictors for PD were alkaline phosphatase (ALP) > 135 U/l (p = 0.002), PSA > 200 ng/ml (p = 0.036), and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the “hottest lesion” in pre-therapeutic PET < 45 (p = 0.005). The predictive score including PSA, ALP and SUVmax could separate 2 distinct groups of patients: ≤ 2 predictive factors (19% PD) and 3 predictive factors (90% PD). Conclusion The presented predictive score allowed a pre-therapeutic estimate of the expected response to 2 cycles of RLT. As our study was retrospective, prospective trials are needed for validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian M M Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Randall L Lindquist
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Barbara Erber
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Piotr Radojewski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Özdirik B, Amthauer H, Schatka I, Goretzki PE, Mogl MT, Fehrenbach U, Tacke F, Jann H, Roderburg C. A rare case of a patient with a high grade neuroendocrine tumor developing neutropenic sepsis after receiving PRRT combined with Capecitabine or Temozolomide: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2020; 14:20. [PMID: 33363730 PMCID: PMC7725216 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2020.2182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare and demonstrate variable clinical behavior depending on the degree of tumor differentiation. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors (NET G3) have a poor prognosis. Systemic treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy is considered to be the treatment of choice. In patients that are refractory or intolerant to first-line therapy, experts recommend peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in tumors that express somatostatin receptors. Recently, combinations of PRRT and chemotherapy were tested in patients with NET. Available data have reported promising tumor control rates and an excellent toxicity profile in cases where PRRT had been administered with capecitabine/temozolomide, even when administered as salvage therapy. The current study reported an exceptional case of advanced NET G3 with severe toxicity upon receiving PRRT in combination with capecitabine/temozolomide as third line therapy. The patient developed a life-threatening neutropenic fever, fungal pneumonia and necrotizing mastitis 23 days after the first cycle of therapy was administered. However, the treatment led to a significant reduction in tumor size. A total of 5 months after treatment initiation, the patient was alive and in excellent clinical condition with sustained tumor response. In summary, the current study presented a rare case of high grade NET exhibiting an almost complete response to PRRT in combination capecitabine/temozolomide, despite facing unexpected severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcin Özdirik
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Peter E Goretzki
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Martina T Mogl
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Henning Jann
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Christoph Roderburg
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 13353, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rogasch J, Beck M, Stromberger C, Hofheinz F, Ghadjar P, Wust P, Budach V, Amthauer H, Tinhofer I, Furth C, Walter-Rittel TC, Zschaeck S. PET measured hypoxia and MRI parameters in re-irradiated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: findings of a prospective pilot study. F1000Res 2020; 9:1350. [PMID: 33796277 PMCID: PMC7970429 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.27303.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Tumor hypoxia measured by dedicated tracers like [
18F]fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) is a well-established prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT). However, prevalence and characteristics of positron emission tomography (PET) measured hypoxia in patients with relapse after previous irradiation is missing. Here we report imaging findings of a prospective pilot study in HNSCC patients treated with re-irradiation. Methods: In 8 patients with recurrent HNSCC, diagnosed at a median of 18 months after initial radiotherapy/CRT, [
18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT (n=8) and FMISO-PET/MRI (n=7) or FMISO-PET/CT (n=1) were performed. Static FMISO-PET was performed after 180 min. MRI sequences in PET/MRI included diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and contrast enhanced T1w imaging (StarVIBE). Lesions (primary tumor recurrence, 4; cervical lymph node, 1; both, 3) were delineated on FDG-PET and FMISO-PET data using a background-adapted threshold-based method. SUV
max and SUV
mean in FDG- and FMISO-PET were derived, as well as maximum tumor-to-muscle ratio (TMR
max) and hypoxic volume with 1.6-fold muscle SUV
mean (HV
1.6) in FMISO-PET. Intensity of lesional contrast enhancement was rated relative to contralateral normal tissue. Average ADC values were derived from a 2D region of interest in the tumor. Results: In FMISO-PET, median TMR
max was 1.7 (range: 1.1-1.8). Median HV
1.6 was 0.05 ml (range: 0-7.3 ml). Only in 2/8 patients, HV
1.6 was ≥1.0 ml. In FDG-PET, median SUV
max was 9.3 (range: 5.0-20.1). On contrast enhanced imaging four lesions showed decreased and four lesions increased contrast enhancement compared to non-pathologic reference tissue. Median average ADC was 1,060 ×10
6 mm
2/s (range: 840-1,400 ×10
6 mm
2/s). Conclusions: This pilot study implies that hypoxia detectable by FMISO-PET may not be as prevalent as expected among loco-regional recurrent, HPV negative HNSCC. ADC values were only mildly reduced, and contrast enhancement was variable. The results require confirmation in larger sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thula C Walter-Rittel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rogasch JMM, Furth C, Bluemel S, Radojewski P, Amthauer H, Hofheinz F. Asphericity of tumor FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer: reproducibility and implications for harmonization in multicenter studies. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:134. [PMID: 33140213 PMCID: PMC7606415 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00725-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Asphericity (ASP) of the primary tumor’s metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in FDG-PET/CT is independently predictive for survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, comparability between PET systems may be limited. Therefore, reproducibility of ASP was evaluated at varying image reconstruction and acquisition times to assess feasibility of ASP assessment in multicenter studies.
Methods This is a retrospective study of 50 patients with NSCLC (female 20; median age 69 years) undergoing pretherapeutic FDG-PET/CT (median 3.7 MBq/kg; 180 s/bed position). Reconstruction used OSEM with TOF4/16 (iterations 4; subsets 16; in-plane filter 2.0, 6.4 or 9.5 mm), TOF4/8 (4 it; 8 ss; filter 2.0/6.0/9.5 mm), PSF + TOF2/17 (2 it; 17 ss; filter 2.0/7.0/10.0 mm) or Bayesian-penalized likelihood (Q.Clear; beta, 600/1750/4000). Resulting reconstructed spatial resolution (FWHM) was determined from hot sphere inserts of a NEMA IEC phantom. Data with approx. 5-mm FWHM were retrospectively smoothed to achieve 7-mm FWHM. List mode data were rebinned for acquisition times of 120/90/60 s. Threshold-based delineation of primary tumor MTV was followed by evaluation of relative ASP/SUVmax/MTV differences between datasets and resulting proportions of discordantly classified cases.
Results Reconstructed resolution for narrow/medium/wide in-plane filter (or low/medium/high beta) was approx. 5/7/9 mm FWHM. Comparing different pairs of reconstructed resolution between TOF4/8, PSF + TOF2/17, Q.Clear and the reference algorithm TOF4/16, ASP differences was lowest at FWHM of 7 versus 7 mm. Proportions of discordant cases (ASP > 19.5% vs. ≤ 19.5%) were also lowest at 7 mm (TOF4/8, 2%; PSF + TOF2/17, 4%; Q.Clear, 10%). Smoothing of 5-mm data to 7-mm FWHM significantly reduced discordant cases (TOF4/8, 38% reduced to 2%; PSF + TOF2/17, 12% to 4%; Q.Clear, 10% to 6%), resulting in proportions comparable to original 7-mm data. Shorter acquisition time only increased proportions of discordant cases at < 90 s. Conclusions ASP differences were mainly determined by reconstructed spatial resolution, and multicenter studies should aim at comparable FWHM (e.g., 7 mm; determined by in-plane filter width). This reduces discordant cases (high vs. low ASP) to an acceptable proportion for TOF and PSF + TOF of < 5% (Q.Clear: 10%). Data with better resolution (i.e., lower FWHM) could be retrospectively smoothed to the desired FWHM, resulting in a comparable number of discordant cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian M M Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bluemel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Piotr Radojewski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Institute for Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Labeur TA, Hofsink Q, Takkenberg RB, van Delden OM, Mathôt RAA, Schinner R, Malfertheiner P, Amthauer H, Schütte K, Basu B, Kuhl C, Mayerle J, Ricke J, Klümpen HJ. The value of sorafenib trough levels in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma - a substudy of the SORAMIC trial. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1028-1035. [PMID: 32366155 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1759826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Background: Sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is dose adjusted by toxicity. Preliminary studies have suggested an association between plasma concentrations of sorafenib and its main metabolite (M2) and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to validate these findings and establish target values for sorafenib trough concentrations.Methods: Patients with advanced HCC were prospectively recruited within a multicenter phase II study (SORAMIC). Patients with blood samples available at trough level were included for this pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy. Trough plasma concentrations of sorafenib and its main metabolite (M2) were associated with sorafenib-related toxicity and overall survival (OS).Results: Seventy-four patients were included with a median OS of 19.7 months (95% CI 16.1-23.3). Patients received sorafenib for a median of 51 weeks (IQR 27-62) and blood samples were drawn after a median of 25 weeks (IQR 10-42). Patients had a median trough concentration of 3217 ng/ml (IQR 2166-4526) and 360 ng/ml (IQR 190-593) with coefficients of variation of 65% and 146% for sorafenib and M2, respectively. Patients who experienced severe sorafenib-related toxicity received a lower average daily dose (551 vs 730 mg/day, p = .003), but showed no significant differences in sorafenib (3298 vs 2915 ng/ml, p = .442) or M2 trough levels (428 vs 283 ng/ml, p = .159). Trough levels of sorafenib or M2 showed no significant association with OS.Conclusions: In patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib, the administered dose, trough levels of sorafenib or M2, and clinical outcomes were poorly correlated. Toxicity-adjusted dosing remains the standard for sorafenib treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim A. Labeur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Quincy Hofsink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Bart Takkenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M. van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron A. A. Mathôt
- Hospital Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina Schinner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Marienhospital Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Bristi Basu
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christiane Kuhl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zschaeck S, Li Y, Lin Q, Beck M, Amthauer H, Bauersachs L, Hajiyianni M, Rogasch J, Ehrhardt VH, Kalinauskaite G, Weingärtner J, Hartmann V, van den Hoff J, Budach V, Stromberger C, Hofheinz F. Prognostic value of baseline [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters MTV, TLG and asphericity in an international multicenter cohort of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236841. [PMID: 32730364 PMCID: PMC7392321 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters have shown prognostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC), mostly in monocenter studies. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of standard and novel PET parameters in a multicenter cohort of patients. Methods The established PET parameters metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as well as the novel parameter tumor asphericity (ASP) were evaluated in a retrospective multicenter cohort of 114 NPC patients with FDG-PET staging, treated with (chemo)radiation at 8 international institutions. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), distant metastases-free survival (FFDM), and locoregional control (LRC) was performed for clinical and PET parameters. Results When analyzing metric PET parameters, ASP showed a significant association with EFS (p = 0.035) and a trend for OS (p = 0.058). MTV was significantly associated with EFS (p = 0.026), OS (p = 0.008) and LRC (p = 0.012) and TLG with LRC (p = 0.019). TLG and MTV showed a very high correlation (Spearman’s rho = 0.95), therefore TLG was subesequently not further analysed. Optimal cutoff values for defining high and low risk groups were determined by maximization of the p-value in univariate Cox regression considering all possible cutoff values. Generation of stable cutoff values was feasible for MTV (p<0.001), ASP (p = 0.023) and combination of both (MTV+ASP = occurrence of one or both risk factors, p<0.001) for OS and for MTV regarding the endpoints OS (p<0.001) and LRC (p<0.001). In multivariable Cox (age >55 years + one binarized PET parameter), MTV >11.1ml (hazard ratio (HR): 3.57, p<0.001) and ASP > 14.4% (HR: 3.2, p = 0.031) remained prognostic for OS. MTV additionally remained prognostic for LRC (HR: 4.86 p<0.001) and EFS (HR: 2.51 p = 0.004). Bootstrapping analyses showed that a combination of high MTV and ASP improved prognostic value for OS compared to each single variable significantly (p = 0.005 and p = 0.04, respectively). When using the cohort from China (n = 57 patients) for establishment of prognostic parameters and all other patients for validation (n = 57 patients), MTV could be successfully validated as prognostic parameter regarding OS, EFS and LRC (all p-values <0.05 for both cohorts). Conclusions In this analysis, PET parameters were associated with outcome of NPC patients. MTV showed a robust association with OS, EFS and LRC. Our data suggest that combination of MTV and ASP may potentially further improve the risk stratification of NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Marcus Beck
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Bauersachs
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marina Hajiyianni
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincent H. Ehrhardt
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian Weingärtner
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivian Hartmann
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Özdirik B, Tacke F, Benz F, Amthauer H, Fehrenbach U, Roderburg C, Jann H. A case report of an excellent response to interferon- α in a patient with functional metastasized neuroendocrine tumor refractory to other treatments. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20820. [PMID: 32569231 PMCID: PMC7310897 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Interferon alpha (IFNα) has been used for a long time in patients with functionally active neuroendocrine tumors (NET). However, due to the unfavorable toxicity profile of interferon, the perceived limited efficacy as well as the development of novel substances, IFNα is only used sparingly in the treatment of NET to date. PATIENTS CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS We describe the case of a 63-year-old male patient with highly differentiated, functional NET of the ileum and synchronous liver metastasis. INTERVENTIONS After failure of classical therapies including dose-intensified somatostatin analog treatment and palliative primary tumor resection, a therapy with pegylated IFNα2a (135 μg/wk) was initiated. Following this treatment, the patient fully recovered from signs of hypersecretion and demonstrated an impressive tumor response. OUTCOMES Thirty months after initiating IFNα, the patient is still free of clinical symptoms and shows a sustained tumor response. Notably, no relevant side effects were observed. CONCLUSION Our case report supports the use of IFNα in patients with functional NET refractory to classical treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcin Özdirik
- Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte
| | - Frank Tacke
- Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte
| | - Fabian Benz
- Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Department of Radiology, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Radiologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Roderburg
- Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte
| | - Henning Jann
- Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Schmitz-Steinkrüger H, Lange C, Apostolova I, Amthauer H, Lehnert W, Klutmann S, Buchert R. Impact of the size of the normal database on the performance of the specific binding ratio in dopamine transporter SPECT. EJNMMI Phys 2020; 7:34. [PMID: 32435936 PMCID: PMC7239986 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00304-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the impact of the size of the normal database on the classification performance of the specific binding ratio (SBR) in dopamine transporter (DAT) SPECT with [123I]FP-CIT in different settings. METHODS The first subject sample comprised 645 subjects from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI), 207 healthy controls (HC), and 438 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. The second sample comprised 372 patients from clinical routine patient care, 186 with non-neurodegenerative parkinsonian syndrome (PS) and 186 with neurodegenerative PS. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images of the clinical sample were reconstructed with two different reconstruction algorithms (filtered backprojection, iterative ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction with resolution recovery). The putaminal specific binding ratio (SBR) was computed using an anatomical region of interest (ROI) predefined in standard (MNI) space in the Automated Anatomic Labeling (AAL) atlas or using hottest voxels (HV) analysis in large predefined ROIs. SBR values were transformed to z-scores using mean and standard deviation of the SBR in a normal database of varying sizes (n = 5, 10, 15,…, 50) randomly selected from the HC subjects (PPMI sample) or the patients with non-neurodegenerative PS (clinical sample). Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying patients with PD or neurodegenerative PS were determined as performance measures using a predefined fixed cutoff on the z-score. This was repeated for 10,000 randomly selected normal databases, separately for each size of the normal database. Mean and 5th percentile of the performance measures over the 10,000 realizations were computed. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity when using the whole set of HC or non-neurodegenerative PS subjects as normal database were used as benchmark. RESULTS Mean loss of accuracy of the putamen SBR z-score was below 1% when the normal database included at least 15 subjects, independent of subject sample (PPMI or clinical), reconstruction method (filtered backprojection or OSEM), and ROI method (AAL or HV). However, the variability of the accuracy of the putamen SBR z-score decreased monotonically with increasing size of normal database and was still considerable at size 15. In order to achieve less than 5% "maximum" loss of accuracy (defined by the 5th percentile) in all settings required at least 25 to 30 subjects in the normal database. Reduction of mean and "maximum" loss of accuracy of the putamen SBR z-score by further increasing the size of the normal database was very small beyond size 40. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that 25 to 30 is the minimum size of the normal database to reliably achieve good performance of semi-quantitative analysis in dopamine transporter (DAT) SPECT, independent of the algorithm used for image reconstruction and the ROI method used to estimate the putaminal SBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Schmitz-Steinkrüger
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Catharina Lange
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wencke Lehnert
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Klutmann
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ralph Buchert
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Perosa V, de Boer L, Ziegler G, Apostolova I, Buchert R, Metzger C, Amthauer H, Guitart-Masip M, Düzel E, Betts MJ. Corrigendum: The Role of the Striatum in Learning to Orthogonalize Action and Valence: A Combined PET and 7 T MRI Aging Study. Cereb Cortex 2020; 30:3857. [PMID: 32338704 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Perosa
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipzigerstr. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipzigerstr. 44 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipzigerstr. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Lieke de Boer
- Ageing Research Centre, Karolinska Institute, SE-11330 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gabriel Ziegler
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipzigerstr. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipzigerstr. 44 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Ralph Buchert
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London WC1B 5EH, UK
| | - Coraline Metzger
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipzigerstr. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipzigerstr. 44 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Guitart-Masip
- Ageing Research Centre, Karolinska Institute, SE-11330 Stockholm, Sweden.,Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London WC1B 5EH, UK
| | - Emrah Düzel
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipzigerstr. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipzigerstr. 44 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Matthew J Betts
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipzigerstr. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Leipzigerstr. 44 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mogl MT, Dobrindt EM, Buschermöhle J, Bures C, Pratschke J, Amthauer H, Wetz C, Jann H. Influence of Gender on Therapy and Outcome of Neuroendocrine Tumors of Gastroenteropancreatic Origin: A Single-Center Analysis. Visc Med 2020; 36:20-27. [PMID: 32110653 DOI: 10.1159/000505500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Gender-specific treatment is gaining growing attention in various fields of medicine. In gastrointestinal cancer, influence of sex on outcome has been discussed, while this has not been the case in neuroendocrine tumors. Overall, the incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms is rising, especially for appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms in women. Also, women seem to have a slight advantage in response to therapy, especially for liver metastases. Objectives This single-center analysis aimed to investigate gender-specific differences in our cohort related to distribution, therapy, and outcome. Methods Patients from the NET registry as well as the clinic database were evaluated retrospectively concerning overall survival and response to therapy with respect to gender. A subgroup analysis was carried out for patients with low grading and response to chemotherapy, as well as for patients with good and moderate grading receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and for a group of patients with liver surgery. Results No specific differences could be detected for overall survival or response to therapy between male and female patients. Mean survival was estimated with 242.2 months (±10.39 SD) altogether and 221.7 months (± 13.02 SD) for male patients and 253.5 months (±15.24 SD) for female patients from the NET registry from initial diagnosis. There was no significant difference between female and male patients (p = 0.136). For patients receiving chemotherapy, overall survival from initial diagnosis was calculated with 26 months (±2.59) and did not show any significant differences between female and male patients 24.8 months (±2.81 SD) vs. 27.8 months (±3.86 SD, p = 0.87). Patients undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy showed a median progression-free survival of 26.9 months (±2.82 SD), with 16.9 (±5.595 SD) and 26.9 months (±3.019 SD) for male and female patients, respectively (p = 0.2). In the group of patients with liver surgery, female patients reached an estimated overall survival of 64.7 months (±4.16 SD), male patients 65.1 months (±2.79 SD, p = 0.562). Conclusion Our cohort did not reveal significant differences in outcome and response to therapy with regards to gender.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina T Mogl
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva M Dobrindt
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josephine Buschermöhle
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Bures
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Wetz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henning Jann
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|