Phase II Study of Sorafenib Combined with Concurrent Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Thrombosis

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with camrelizumab and apatinib as conversion therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm exploratory trial

BACKGROUND

The development of systemic therapy, including targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, has significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been gradually applied to the treatment of advanced uHCC, showing good potential as conversion therapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with camrelizumab and apatinib as conversion therapy for uHCC.

METHODS

This study was a single-arm exploratory trial (NCT05099848) in patients with uHCC. Eligible patients received apatinib 250 mg once daily, camrelizumab 200 mg on day 3, and HAIC with FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 at hours 0-2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 at hours 2-3, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 at hour 3, followed by fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 for 46 h) on days 4-5 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles. Primary endpoints were conversion rate and margin-free (R0) resection rate.

RESULTS

Between March 2021 and July 2023, 19 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 14.9 months (interquartile range, 10.9-21.1). Disease became resectable in 14 (73.7%) of 19 patients; nine (47.4%) patients received R0 resection, while five (26.3%) refused surgery and opted for observation. Three (33.3%) of nine patients with surgery achieved major pathological response, including two (22.2%) with pathological complete response. Objective response and disease control rates were 47.4% (9/19) and 89.5% (17/19) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and both 89.5% (17/19) per modified RECIST. Survival data were immature. Fourteen (73.7%) of 19 patients had grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, with the most common being increased alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (seven [36.8%]) and increased lymphocyte count (six [31.6%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of HAIC, camrelizumab, and apatinib as conversion therapy shows promising clinical benefits and a manageable safety profile in patients with uHCC. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05099848. Registered on October 13, 2021.

A Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Cine-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting the Response of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined With Systemic Therapies

Recently, a hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC)-associated combination therapeutic regimen, comprising HAIC and systemic therapies (molecular targeted therapy plus immunotherapy), referred to as HAIC combination therapy, has demonstrated promising anticancer effects. Identifying individuals who may potentially benefit from HAIC combination therapy could contribute to improved treatment decision-making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This dual-center study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data with advanced HCC patients who underwent HAIC combination therapy and pretreatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) evaluations from March 2019 to March 2023. Two deep learning models, AE-3DNet and 3DNet, along with a time-intensity curve-based model, were developed for predicting therapeutic responses from pretreatment CEUS cine images. Diagnostic metrics, including the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), were calculated to compare the performance of the models. Survival analysis was used to assess the relationship between predicted responses and prognostic outcomes. The model of AE-3DNet was constructed on the top of 3DNet, with innovative incorporation of spatiotemporal attention modules to enhance the capacity for dynamic feature extraction. 326 patients were included, 243 of whom formed the internal validation cohort, which was utilized for model development and fivefold cross-validation, while the rest formed the external validation cohort. Objective response (OR) or non-objective response (non-OR) were observed in 63% (206/326) and 37% (120/326) of the participants, respectively. Among the three efficacy prediction models assessed, AE-3DNet performed superiorly with AUC values of 0.84 and 0.85 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. AE-3DNet's predicted response survival curves closely resembled actual clinical outcomes. The deep learning model of AE-3DNet developed based on pretreatment CEUS cine performed satisfactorily in predicting the responses of advanced HCC to HAIC combination therapy, which may serve as a promising tool for guiding combined therapy and individualized treatment strategies. Trial Registration: NCT02973685.

Predictive factors and prognostic models for Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in Hepatocellular carcinoma: a comprehensive review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent and lethal cancer, often diagnosed at advanced stages where traditional treatments such as surgical resection, liver transplantation, and locoregional therapies provide limited benefits. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for advanced HCC, enhancing anti-tumor efficacy through targeted drug delivery while minimizing systemic side effects. However, the heterogeneous nature of HCC leads to variable responses to HAIC, highlighting the necessity for reliable predictive indicators to tailor personalized treatment strategies. This review explores the factors influencing HAIC success, including patient demographics, tumor characteristics, biomarkers, genomic profiles, and advanced imaging techniques such as radiomics and deep learning models. Additionally, the synergistic potential of HAIC combined with immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapies is examined, demonstrating improved survival outcomes. Prognostic scoring systems and nomograms that integrate clinical, molecular, and imaging data are discussed as superior tools for individualized prognostication compared to traditional staging systems. Understanding these predictors is essential for optimizing HAIC efficacy and enhancing survival and quality of life for patients with advanced HCC. Future research directions include large-scale prospective studies, integration of multi-omics data, and advancements in artificial intelligence to refine predictive models and further personalize treatment approaches.

Consensus of Chinese Experts on Neoadjuvant and Conversion Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2023 Update

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy in China, with high recurrence rate and low resection rate among patients first diagnosed. Preoperative treatments including neoadjuvant and conversion therapy have the potential to overcome these challenges. In December 2021, Chinese expert consensus on neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma was published. With the emersion of new evidence regarding the neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for HCC, the cooperative group brought together multidisciplinary researchers and scholars with experience in related fields to update the new edition (2023 Edition) for reference in China, including principle of the treatment strategies, the potential populations selection, treatment methods, multidisciplinary team, and future research for preoperative treatments. The new consensus aims to provide guidance for clinical application. Through the use of neoadjuvant therapy and conversion therapy, we can enhance the resection rate and reduce the recurrence of intermediate-to-advanced HCC patients, thereby improving survival outcomes.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of combined surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy and postoperative PVC for hepatocellular carcinoma with mPVTT

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accompanied by main portal vein tumor thrombosis (mPVTT) is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel triple therapy approach combining surgery, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and postoperative portal vein infusion chemotherapy (PVC) for HCC with mPVTT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 patients diagnosed with HCC and mPVTT. Patients were divided into two groups: the surgery-IORT-PVC group (n = 21) and the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) group (n = 35). Baseline characteristics, treatment procedures, postoperative complications, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The surgery-IORT-PVC group (n = 21) demonstrated superior median overall survival (OS) (not reached vs. 7 months, P < 0.05 4.99(2.543-9.792)) and median progression-free survival (PFS) (not reached vs. 4 months, P < 0.05 5.268(2.765-10.03)) compared to the TACE-HAIC group (n = 35). Additional, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS (75.6 %, 60.5 %, 60.5 % vs 28.8 %, 8.2 %, 8.2 %) and PFS (73.3 %, 64.1 %, 64.1 % vs 9.5 %, 9.5 %, 9.5 %) of the surgery-IORT-PVC group significantly superior to that of the TACE-HAIC group. Multivariate analysis identified the treatment modality as an independent factor influencing both OS and PFS. Postoperative complications in the surgery-IORT-PVC group were manageable. No severe adverse events were reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this novel treatment modality offers a potential effective therapy modality for patients with HCC and mPVTT who previously had limited therapeutic options.

Adverse events associated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has emerged as a promising treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the safety profiles of HAIC and its various combination therapies remain to be systematically evaluated.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to November 2024. Studies reporting adverse events (AEs) of HAIC monotherapy or combination therapies in HCC were included. The severity and frequency of AEs were analyzed according to different treatment protocols.

Results

A total of 58 studies (11 prospective, 47 retrospective) were included. HAIC monotherapy demonstrated relatively mild toxicity, primarily affecting hepatobiliary (transaminase elevation 53.2%, hypoalbuminemia 57.2%) and hematological systems (anemia 43.0%, thrombocytopenia 35.2%). HAIC with targeted therapy showed increased adverse events, including characteristic reactions like hand-foot syndrome (48.0%) and hypertension (49.9%). HAIC combined with targeted, and immunotherapy exhibited the highest adverse reaction rates (neutropenia 82.9%, transaminase elevation 97.1%), while HAIC with anti-angiogenic and immunotherapy showed a relatively favorable safety profile. Prospective studies consistently reported higher incidence rates than retrospective studies, suggesting potential underreporting in clinical practice.

Conclusions

Different HAIC-based regimens exhibit distinct safety profiles requiring individualized management approaches. We propose a comprehensive framework for patient selection, monitoring strategies, and AE management. These recommendations aim to optimize treatment outcomes while minimizing adverse impacts on patient quality of life.

The Combination of D-TACE-HAIC, Lenvatinib, and PD-1 Inhibitors Shows Significant Clinical Efficacy in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

This study was developed to compare the efficacy of combined D-TACE-HAIC + lenvatinib + PD-1 inhibitor treatment to that of TACE + sorafenib treatment for patients with intermediate and advanced HCC.

Patients and Methods

Here, a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) from March 2018 to March 2022 at the our hospital was conducted. In total, 60 patients underwent treatment with drug-eluting beads-TACE-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (D-TACE-HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (Group A), while 21 underwent combined TACE and sorafenib treatment (Group B).

Results

In this study cohort, the rate of surgical conversion in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B (33.3% vs 9.5%). As per the Revised Evaluation Criteria for Clinical Efficacy in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria, the objective remission rate in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B (86.6% vs 33.4%). Group A also exhibited significantly higher rates of overall adverse events including hypertension, abdominal pain, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypoproteinemia as compared to Group B, although the incidence of hand-foot syndrome in Group A was significantly reduced as compared to Group B (13.3% vs 42.8%). The median progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) of patients in Group A were 13.2 and 28.8 months, with both being significantly higher than the corresponding intervals in Group B (5.7 and 10.8 months, respectively). Cox multivariate analyses identified combination D-TACE-HAIC + lenvatinib+ PD-1 inhibitor treatment as being independently associated with patient PFS and OS.

Conclusion

In summary, D-TACE-HAIC + lenvatinib + PD-1 inhibitor treatment exhibits a favorable safety profile, outperforming TACE + sorafenib treatment for unresectable HCC patients while improving overall rates of translational efficacy, increasing rates of surgical conversion, prolonging patient survival, and conferring long-term survival benefits.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with the FOLFOX regimen for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and literature review

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of primary liver cancer (PLC) has experienced a significant global increase, primarily attributed to the rise in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unfortunately, HCC is often diagnosed in advanced stages, leaving patients with limited treatment options. Therefore, transformation therapy is a crucial approach for long-term survival and radical resection in patients with advanced HCC. Conversion therapy has demonstrated promise in the treatment of advanced HCC. When integrated with the FOLFOX regimen, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) can significantly improve tumor response efficiency, leading to high conversion and resection rates.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed landmark trials of HAIC in combination with different drugs or means for the treatment of HCC to determine the clinical value of HAIC-centric translational therapies in HCC treatment. Furthermore, we specifically emphasize the advantages associated with employing FOLFOX-HAIC in the treatment of advanced HCC.

EXPERT OPINION

The combination of HAIC with the FOLFOX regimen can help prevent the low intratumoral accumulation and high adverse reaction rate caused by the FOLFOX alone, holding significant potential in the comprehensive treatment of future HCC patients.

Arterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: consensus recommendations

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment is widely accepted as one of the alternative therapeutic modalities for HCC owing to its local control effect and low systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, although accumulating high-quality evidence has displayed the superior survival advantages of HAIC of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (HAIC-FOLFOX) compared with standard first-line treatment in different scenarios, the lack of standardization for HAIC procedure and remained controversy limited the proper and safe performance of HAIC treatment in HCC. Therefore, an expert consensus conference was held on March 2023 in Guangzhou, China to review current practices regarding HAIC treatment in patients with HCC and develop widely accepted statements and recommendations. In this article, the latest evidence of HAIC was systematically summarized and the final 22 expert recommendations were proposed, which incorporate the assessment of candidates for HAIC treatment, procedural technique details, therapeutic outcomes, the HAIC-related complications and corresponding treatments, and therapeutic scheme management.

Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters: a novel efficacy predictor of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) is a novel vascular pattern structurally and functionally distinct from microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to explore the prognostic value of VETC in patients receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for unresectable HCC.

METHODS

From January 2016 to December 2017, 145 patients receiving HAIC as the initial treatment for unresectable HCC were enrolled and stratified into two groups according to their VETC status. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into two groups: VETC+ (n = 31, 21.8%) and VETC- (n = 114, 78.2%). The patients in the VETC+ group had worse ORR and DCR than those in the VETC- group (RECIST: ORR: 25.8% vs. 47.4%, P = 0.031; DCR: 56.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007; mRECIST: ORR: 41.0% vs. 52.6%, P = 0.008; DCR: 56.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007). Patients with VETC+ had significantly shorter OS and PFS than those with VETC- (median OS: 10.2 vs. 21.6 months, P < 0.001; median PFS: 3.3 vs. 7.2 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed VETC status as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.46-3.94; P = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.20-3.22; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

VETC status correlates remarkably well with the tumor response and long-term survival in patients undergoing HAIC. It may be a promising efficacy predictor and help identify patients who will benefit from HAIC.

The worthy role of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in combination with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Systemic therapy remains the primary therapeutic approach for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nonetheless, its efficacy in achieving control of intrahepatic lesions is constrained. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a therapeutic approach that combines localized treatment with systemic antitumor effects, which aim is to effectively manage the progression of cancerous lesions within the liver, particularly in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Combining HAIC with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) immunotherapy is anticipated to emerge as a novel therapeutic approach aimed at augmenting the response inside the localized tumor site and achieving prolonged survival advantages. In order to assess the effectiveness, safety, and applicability of various therapeutic modalities and to address potential molecular mechanisms underlying the efficacy of HAIC-sensitizing immunotherapy, we reviewed the literature about the combination of HAIC with anti-PD-1 mAb therapies.

The efficacy and safety of different systemic combination therapies on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aims

Systemic combinations have recently brought significant therapeutic benefits for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). To design the most effective combination regimens, a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022321949) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic combinations on aHCC.

Methods

We retrieved all the studies from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms until December 21, 2022. The effect indicators (hazard ratio [HR], relative risk [RR], and median) were pooled by a fixed- or random-effects model. A subgroup analysis was conducted according to types and specific therapies.

Results

In total, 88 eligible studies were selected from 7249 potential records. Each kind of combination treatment (chemotherapy plus chemotherapy, targeted plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, targeted plus chemotherapy, and targeted plus targeted therapy) had a better objective response rate (ORR) in patients with aHCC, compared to the monotherapy mostly with sorafenib (RR: 1.57 [1.44-1.71]; I 2 = 30%). Of those, targeted plus ICI therapy showed better therapeutic efficiency in overall survival (median: 15.02 [12.67-17.38]), progression-free survival (median: 7.08 [6.42-7.74]), and ORR (RR: 1.81 [1.55-2.13]), compared to the monotherapy. Specifically, Atezo plus Beva showed all those benefits. Our pooled result showed all the combinations had increased ≥3 Grade treatment-related adverse events (TrAEs), with an RR of 1.25 [95% CI: 1.15-1.36], compared to the monotherapy.

Conclusion

The systemic combinations, especially targeted plus ICI therapy, including Atezo plus Beva, significantly improve clinical outcomes but increase side effects in patients with aHCC. Future trials should concentrate on improvement in therapeutic efficiency and reduction of toxicity of targeted plus ICI therapy.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42022321949.

Survival benefit of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Background/purpose: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is generally poor and hepatectomy is optional for these patients. This study aims to explore the survival benefits of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for resectable HCC with PVTT. Methods: This retrospective study included 120 resectable HCC patients with PVTT who underwent hepatectomy, from January 2017 to January 2021 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Of these patients, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 55 patients who received hepatectomy alone (Surgery group) and 65 patients who received neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy (HAIC-Surgery group) were compared. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to develop a model predicting the response to neoadjuvant HAIC. Results: The OS rates for the HAIC-Surgery group at 1, 3, and 5 years were 94.9%, 78%, and 66.4%, respectively, compared with 84.6%, 47.6%, and 37.2% in the Surgery group (p < 0.001). The RFS rates were 88.7%, 56.2%, and 38.6% versus 84.9%, 38.3%, and 22.6% (p = 0.002). The subgroup analysis revealed that the survival benefit of neoadjuvant HAIC was limited to patients who responded to it. The logistic model, consisting of AFP and CRP, that predicted the response to neoadjuvant HAIC performed well, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.756. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy is associated with a longer survival outcome than hepatectomy alone for HCC patients with PVTT and the survival benefit is limited to patients who respond to neoadjuvant FOLFOX-HAIC.

The Predictive Role of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Treatment Response and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with FOLFOX Regimen: A Preliminary Study

Objective

This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether pre-treatment inflammatory biomarkers, including the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), could predict treatment response and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with the oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX) regimen.

Methods

Based on the cut-off values identified using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, 124 patients with HCC who received HAIC with the FOLFOX regimen were divided into low- and high-score MLR, PLR, PNI, and SII groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

The cut-off values were 0.569 for MLR (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.621), 177.01 for PLR (AUC: 0.554), 713.05 for SII (AUC: 0.570), and 46.85 for PNI (AUC: 0.665). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.027; P=0.032), high MLR (HR: 7.250; P=0.002), and low PNI (HR: 0.296; P=0.003) were independent predictors of HAIC non-response, with an AUC value of 0.746 (95% CI: 0.658-0.833). A high MLR (HR: 1.714, 95% CI: 1.086-2.704, P=0.021) was also an independent predictor of PFS. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the patients with a high MLR had shorter PFS than those with a low MLR (median PFS: 6 vs 10 months, P=0.011).

Conclusion

The pre-treatment MLR and PNI were predictors of non-response in patients with HCC receiving HAIC with the FOLFOX regimen. The MLR also was an independent predictor of PFS.

Conversion therapy for massive hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and literature review

KEY CLINICAL MESSAGE

For potentially resectable HCC, a more aggressive conversion therapy strategy (high-intensity combined with multiple treatment modalities) can be used.

ABSTRACT

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide. The best treatment for HCC is radical surgical resection, but 70%-80% of patients are ineligible for surgery. Although conversion therapy is an established treatment strategy for various solid tumors, there is no uniform protocol for treating HCC. In this case, we present a 69-year-old male patient diagnosed with massive HCC with Barcelona clinical liver cancer (BCLC) stage B. Because of the insufficient volume of the future liver remnant, we believed radical surgical resection was temporarily impossible. Therefore, the patient received conversion therapy, including four cycles of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC-Folfox), lenvatinib (8 mg orally once a day), and tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody, 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks). Fortunately, the patient achieved a good treatment response (smaller lesions and improved liver function) and underwent radical surgery finally. There was no clinical evidence of recurrence at 6 months of follow-up. For potentially resectable HCC, this case reveals that a more aggressive conversion therapy strategy (high-intensity combined with multiple treatment modalities) can be used.

Conversion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion: a comprehensive review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer and has a high mortality rate worldwide. The percentage of HCC patients with vascular invasion at the time of initial HCC diagnosis is 10%-40%. According to most guidelines, HCC with vascular invasion is classified as advanced stage, and resection is only suggested for a minority of such patients. Recently, advances in systemic and locoregional treatments for such patients have resulted in amazing response rates. Therefore, a "conversion therapy" strategy including systemic and locoregional treatments is proposed to select patients from an initially unresectable state to eventually undergo R0 resection. Recently, many studies have proven that conversion therapy followed by subsequent surgery is achievable in well-selected advanced HCC patients and can provide prolonged long-term outcomes. Based on published research, this review has summarized the clinical experience and evidence of conversion treatment in HCC patients with vascular invasion.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Applicability in Western countries

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX-HAIC) has shown a strong anti-tumor effect in hepatocellular carcinoma in China. Different from hepatocellular carcinoma in China, hepatocellular carcinoma in Western countries is caused by hepatitis C and alcoholic liver disease, and is often diagnosed at an early stage, when the tumor is small or the thrombus is not serious. Although there are no reports of FOLFOX-HAIC efficacy for hepatocellular carcinoma in Western countries, FOLFOX-HAIC can be used in patients with large tumors (> 5 cm) (or T3 by TNM stage), and rich blood supply.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Refractory to Transarterial Chemoembolization: Retrospective Subgroup Analysis of 2 Prospective Trials

Purpose:Sorafenib is recommended for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization but with unsatisfactory overall survival and tumor response rate. Previously published studies showed hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin was an effective and safe treatment. The aims of this study were to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization. Methods: This was a retrospective subgroup analysis of 2 prospective clinical trials, including 114 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were confirmed to be transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness. Of these, 55 patients received hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX-HAIC group, oxaliplatin 85 or 130 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m², and 2400 mg/m² for 23 or 46 h, every 3 weeks), and 59 patients were treated with sorafenib (sorafenib group, 400 mg sorafenib twice daily). Overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse events were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The FOLFOX-HAIC group showed a longer overall survival (17.1 months [95% confidence interval 13.4-20.8] vs 9.1 months [95% confidence interval 7.5-10.6]; hazard ratio 0.35 [95% confidence interval 0.23-0.53]; P < .001), a higher objective response rate (RECIST: 18 [32.7%] vs 1 [1.7%], P < .001), and a longer progression-free survival (7.6 months [95% confidence interval 5.6-9.6] vs 3.9 months [95% confidence interval 2.3-5.4]; hazard ratio 0.49 [95% confidence interval 0.33-0.72]; P < .001) than the sorafenib group. The safety results suggested that both oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sorafenib had acceptable treatment-related toxic effects. No significant difference was observed in the overall occurrence of any grade, grade 3/4, or serious adverse events between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy might be a better choice than sorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization.

One day versus two days of hepatic arterial infusion with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil was effective in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The program of FOLFOX-HAIC in HCC was performed for 1 day (HAIC 1d) or 2 days (HAIC 2d). We hereby retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety between these two treatment regimens and explored the predictive power of thymidylate synthase (TYMS), an enzyme involved in the DNA synthesis process and metabolism of fluorouracil.

METHODS

This study included patients with a primary diagnosis of unresectable HCC. These patients received HAIC for 1 day or 2 days. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events were compared. The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. Peripheral blood samples before the treatments were collected and used to measure the concentration of TYMS through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ELISA was performed according to the manufacturers' guidelines.

RESULTS

We included 368 patients for this study: 248 in the HAIC 1d group and 120 in the HAIC 2d group. There was no significant difference of OS between the two groups (14.5 for HAIC 1d vs 15.3 months for HAIC 2d, p=0.46). Compared with the HAIC 1d group, the HAIC 2d group did not prolong the PFS (7.3 vs 7.5 months, p=0.91) or elevate the tumor response (42.5% vs 39.1%, p=0.53) per RECIST 1.1. In the PSM cohort, the efficacy between the two groups was similar. The total frequencies of grade 3-4 events were higher with the HAIC 2d group than with the HAIC 1d group, especially in the PSM cohort (p=0.043). Additionally, patients with TYMS low level might benefit longer OS from the HAIC 2d group (18.7 vs 13.6 months, p=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

There was not much of a difference in efficacy between the two groups, but the HAIC for 1 day might be safer, which needed further research. The level of TYMS might be the predictive biomarkers.

Successful conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is getting closer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Conversion therapy provides selected patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma the opportunity to undergo a curative hepatectomy and achieve long-term survival. Although various regimens have been used for conversion therapy, their conversion rate and safety remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted some meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy and safety of several conversion regimens in order to elucidate the optimal regimen.

Method

We performed systematic literature research on PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science until July 30, 2022. Chemotherapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), molecular therapy (targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of both), and combined locoregional-systemic therapy were the conversion regimens we targeted.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included. The pooled conversion rates for chemotherapy, TACE, molecular therapy, and combined locoregional-systemic therapy were 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-20%; I² = 82%), 12% (95% CI, 9%-15%; I² = 60%), 10% (95% CI, 3%-20%; I² = 90%), and 25% (95% CI, 13%-38%; I² = 89%), respectively. The pooled objective response rates (ORR) for chemotherapy, TACE, molecular therapy, and combined locoregional-systemic therapy were 19% (95% CI, 12%-28%; I² = 77%), 32% (95% CI, 15%-51%; I² = 88%), 30% (95% CI, 15%-46%; I² = 93%), and 60% (95% CI, 41%-77%; I² = 91%), respectively. The pooled grade ≥3 AEs for chemotherapy, TACE, molecular therapy, and combined locoregional-systemic therapy were 67% (95% CI, 55%-78%; I² = 79%), 34% (95% CI, 8%-66%; I²= 92%), 30% (95% CI, 18%-43%; I² = 84%), and 40% (95% CI, 23%-58%; I² = 89%), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed the conversion rate, ORR and grade ≥3 AE rate for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and locoregional therapy (LRT) were 33% (95% CI, 17%-52%; I² = 89%), 73% (95% CI, 51%-91%; I² = 90%), 31% (95% CI, 10%-57%; I² = 89%), respectively.

Conclusion

Combined locoregional-systemic therapy, especially TKI combined with ICI and LRT, may be the most effective conversion therapy regimen, associated with a significant ORR, conversion potential, and an acceptable safety profile.

Conversion surgery after preoperative therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of molecular targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Optimal strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors, such as those with vascular tumor thrombus and those with extrahepatic metastases are unclear.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted focusing on conversion surgery for HCC after molecular targeted therapy and therapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors.

RESULTS

Upfront surgical resection of advanced HCC tumors has been challenged at some institutions because of lack of promising therapeutic options. Preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in patients with unresectable HCC were developed to improve long-term outcome, but the results were not promising. Nonetheless, the recent advent of molecular targeted therapies and immune check-point inhibitors, enabling frequent tumor responses, has accelerated the use of conversion surgery after these therapies in patients with initially unresectable HCC. Increasing numbers of conversion surgeries after lenvatinib therapy has been reported, and the first prospective clinical trial assessing conversion surgery after lenvatinib therapy in initially unresectable HCC has been commenced. Furthermore, the superiority of combination therapy using atezolizumab and bevacizumab over sorafenib, a conventional first-line drug for unresectable HCC, in terms of overall survival and tumor response has been demonstrated, and the use of this regimen alongside conversion surgery is expected in addition to lenvatinib.

CONCLUSION

The literature demonstrated the feasibility of conversion surgery after systemic therapy. Further clinical investigation of surgery after systemic therapy for advanced HCC may be undertaken by clearly distinguishing the tumor status as technically unresectable or oncologically unresectable but technically resectable.

The Significance of Transarterial Chemo(Embolization) Combined With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Systemic Therapy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Regardless of great progress in early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), unresectable HCC (uHCC) still accounts for the majority of newly diagnosed HCC with poor prognosis. With the promising results of a double combination of transarterial chemo(embolization) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a more aggressive strategy, a triple combination of transarterial chemo(embolization), TKIs, and ICIs has been tried in the recent years. Hence, we aimed to conduct a systematic review to verify the safety and efficacy of the triple therapy for uHCC.

METHODS

PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge were used to screen the eligible studies evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of triple therapy for patients with uHCC up to April 25th 2022, as well as Chinese databases. The endpoints were the complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were eligible with 741 patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with TKIs and ICIs. The pooled rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for CR, ORR, and DCR were 0.124 (0.069-0.190), 0.606 (0.528-0.682), and 0.885 (0.835-0.927). The pooled rates for PFS at 0.5 years and 1 year were 0.781 (0.688-0.862) and 0.387 (0.293-0.486), respectively. The pooled rates for OS at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.690 (0.585-0.786), 0.212 (0.117-0.324), and 0.056 (0.028-0.091), respectively. In addition, the pooled rate and 95%CI for the conversion surgery was 0.359 (0.153-0.595). The subgroup analysis of control studies showed that triple therapy was superior to TACE+TKIs, TKIs+ICIs, and TKIs in CR, ORR, and DCR, conversion rate; PFS; and OS. No fatal AEs were reported, and the top three most common AEs were elevated ALT, elevated AST, and hypertension, as well as severe AEs (grading ≥3).

CONCLUSION

With the current data, we concluded that the triple therapy of TACE/HAIC, TKIs, and ICIs would provide a clinical benefit for uHCC both in short- and long-term outcomes without increasing severe AEs, but the conclusion needs further validation.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, Review registry: CRD42022321970.

Chinese expert consensus on neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

The low resection and high recurrence rates in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the major challenges to improving prognosis. Neoadjuvant and conversion therapies are underlying strategies to overcome these challenges. To date, no guideline or consensus has been published on the neoadjuvant and conversion therapies in HCC. Recent studies showed that neoadjuvant therapy for resectable HCC and conversion therapy for unresectable HCC are safe, feasible, and effective. Neoadjuvant and conversion therapies have the following advantages in treating HCC: R0 resection with sufficient volume of future liver remnant, relatively simple operation, and wide applicability. Therefore, it was necessary to conduct a widely accepted consensus among the experts in China who have extensive expertise and experience in treating HCC using neoadjuvant and conversion therapies, which is important to standardize the application of neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for the management of HCC. The strategies of neoadjuvant therapy include the selection of the eligible patients, therapy regimen, cycles, effect evaluations, and multidisciplinary treatment. The management of patients with insufficient volume of future liver remnant and patients who cannot achieve R0 resection is the key to the strategies of conversion therapy. Here, we present the resultant evidence- and experience-based consensus to guide the application of neoadjuvant and conversion therapies in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is the standard treatment for patients with advanced HCC with improvement in survival and radiologic progression of the disease. Recently, few studies have advocated the Sorafenib + HAIC combination therapy results in better overall survival and progression-free survival than Sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced HCC. Herein, we aim to identify the best possible treatment option among the above two lines of therapy for patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

The fixed effects and a random-effects model were used to perform a meta-analysis for overall response rate overall survival, and adverse events. Subgroup analysis of the data of univariate analysis in each included trial was performed to identify the specific patient population who could be benefitted from the combination therapy.

RESULTS

Four RCTs containing 609 patients were included in the final analysis. The overall response rate (OR: 3.81; 95% CI 1.01 to 14.42; P = 0.05) and overall survival (HR: 0.70; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.24; P > 0.05) were comparable. Subgroup analysis of OS showed that patients with Child-Pugh score B (HR: 0.30; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.72; P < 0.05) and AFP <400 ng/ml (HR: 0.72; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.99; P < 0.05) were associated with significantly improved survival in the Sorafenib + HAIC group. Bone marrow suppression (OR: 3.76; 95% CI 2.58 to 5.48; P < 0.001) was significantly higher in the Sorafenib + HAIC group, but hepatic function impairment, constitutional symptoms, gastrointestinal events, and dermatological events were comparable (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Child-Pugh score B and AFP <400 ng/ml may be benefited most from Sorafenib + HAIC combination therapy.

Downstaging Therapies for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Hepatic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a high-grade malignant disease with unfavorable prognosis, and although surgical therapy is necessary, not all patients with HCC are suitable candidates for surgery. Downstaging as preoperative therapeutic strategy, which can convert unresectable HCC into resectable HCC, intends to increase the resection rate and improve prognosis.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases updated to December 30, 2020, for studies on transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), Yttrium 90 microsphere selective internal radiation (SIR)/transcatheter radioembolization (TARE), hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), and systemic treatment as downstaging treatment before resection for patients with unresectable HCC.

RESULTS

A total of 20 comparative and non-comparative studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. The pooled downstaging rate of hepatic resection (HR) was 14% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.17] with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 94.51%). The chemotherapy, combination, and non-cirrhosis groups exhibit higher rates of downstaging, but these differences were not significant. For comparative studies, the overall survival (OS) rates of resection after downstaging were far better than those inpatients who received locoregional therapy (LRT) or systemic treatment alone at 1 year (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.48-2.38), 3 years (RR 5.56, 95% CI 2.55-12.10), and 5 years (RR 5.47, 95% CI 2.22-13.49). In addition, the pooled disease-free survival (DFS) rates in patients undergoing HR after successful downstaging were 78% (95% CI 0.62-0.93) at 1 year, 47% (95% CI 0.25-0.68) at 3 years, and 46% (95% CI 0.32-0.59) at 5 years. The pooled OS rates were 88% (95% CI 0.82-0.95) at 1 year, 64% (95% CI 0.59-0.69) at 3 years, and 42% (95% CI 0.29-0.54) at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Downstaging may serve as a screening tool to identify patients who might benefit from surgery. Resection after successful downstaging can improve prognosis.

The Impact of Sorafenib in Combination with Intermittent Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Vascular Invasion

The aim of the current study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib and intermittent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with severe portal vein invasion. The antitumor effect was a complete response in 1 of 38 patients, a partial response in 12 patients, stable disease in 16 patients, and progressive disease in 9 patients, for a 34.2% response rate and a 76.3% disease control rate. This regimen had favorable efficacy and acceptable safety and may be feasible for unresectable HCC with severe portal vein invasion.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatobiliary Cancers: State of the Art

Simple Summary

Liver functional failure is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Systemic chemotherapy usually offers a modest benefit in terms of disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival at the cost of a significant percentage of adverse events. Liver malignancies are mostly perfused by the hepatic artery while the normal liver parenchyma by the portal vein network. On these bases, the therapeutic strategy consisting of hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy takes place. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on this approach from different points of view, such as techniques, drugs pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes for advanced hepatobiliary cancers. Most of the collected studies have several limitations: non-randomized retrospective design, a relatively small number of patients, the hepatic arterial administration of different chemotherapeutic agents, as well as its combination with a great heterogeneity of systemic agents. However, despite these limitations, the presented data show favorable results in terms of safety and efficacy for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy, with respect or in alternative to the gold standard treatment, even when they are combined with systemic treatments. Therefore, this therapeutic strategy may be an alternative or an integrative treatment option for advanced hepatobiliary cancers. Further and larger prospective, randomized, multi-center studies, with well-defined inclusion criteria and treatment strategies, are required to confirm the presented data.

Abstract

Liver functional failure is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Primary liver tumors grow up mainly in the liver, and thus happens for liver metastases deriving from other organs having a lower burden of disease at the primary site. Systemic chemotherapy usually offers a modest benefit in terms of disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival at the cost of a significant percentage of adverse events. Liver malignancies are mostly perfused by the hepatic artery while the normal liver parenchyma by the portal vein network. On these bases, the therapeutic strategy consisting of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy takes place. In literature, HAI chemotherapy was applied for the treatment of advanced hepatobiliary cancers with encouraging results. Different chemotherapeutic agents were used such as Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, Floxuridine, 5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, individually or in combination. However, the efficacy of this treatment strategy remains controversial. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the current knowledge on this approach from different points of view, such as techniques, drugs pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes for advanced hepatobiliary cancers.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin With or Without Sorafenib as Initial Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

Our previous study showed that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) plus sorafenib provided a significant survival benefit over sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, it is unclear whether the survival benefit should be attributed to the synergism between HAIC and sorafenib or just HAIC alone. We aim to compare HAIC using FOLFOX plus sorafenib with HAIC alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study including 225 eligible patients treated with HAIC using FOLFOX (HAIC alone group, n=126, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m² and 2400 mg/m² for 46 hours, every 3 weeks) alone or HAIC plus sorafenib (soraHAIC group, n=99, sorafenib 400 mg twice daily). Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and propensity-score matching was used to reduce bias.

Results

The soraHAIC group showed a longer overall survival (12.9 [95% CI, 10.4-15.4] vs. 10.5 [95% CI, 9.5-11.5] months, HR=0.71 [95% CI, 0.53-0.96]; P=0.025), a better progression free survival (7.0 [95% CI, 5.3-8.8] vs. 5.3 [95% CI, 3.5-7.1] months, HR=0.76 [95% CI, 0.58-0.99]; P=0.046), and a higher disease control rate (RECIST 1.1: 74.8% vs. 61.1%, P=0.030) than the HAIC alone group. In multivariate analysis, soraHAIC was an independent favor factor for survival. In terms of the grade 3/4 adverse event, hand–foot skin reaction was more frequent in the soraHAIC group than the HAIC alone group. In the propensity-score matched cohorts (93 pairs), the overall survival, the progression free survival and disease control rates in the soraHAIC group were also better than those in the HAIC group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

HAIC plus sorafenib may improve overall survival and progression free survival compared with HAIC alone as initial treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Lenvatinib, toripalimab, plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Lenvatinib is the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, but prognosis is still unsatisfactory. Recently, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and immune checkpoint inhibitors showed promising results for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Considering different anti-malignancy mechanisms, combining these three treatments may improve outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib, toripalimab, plus HAIC versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

This was a retrospective study including patients treated with lenvatinib [8 mg (⩽60 kg) or 12 mg (>60 kg) once daily] or lenvatinib, toripalimab plus HAIC [LeToHAIC group, lenvatinib 0-1 week prior to initial HAIC, 240 mg toripalimab 0-1 day prior to every HAIC cycle, and HAIC with FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m² on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m² for 46 h, every 3 weeks)]. Progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse events were compared.

Results

From February 2019 to August 2019, 157 patients were included in this study: 71 in the LeToHAIC group and 86 in the lenvatinib group. The LeToHAIC group showed longer progression-free survival (11.1 versus 5.1 months, p < 0.001), longer overall survival (not reached versus 11 months, p < 0.001), and a higher objective response rate (RECIST: 59.2% versus 9.3%, p < 0.001; modified RECIST: 67.6% versus 16.3%, p < 0.001) than the lenvatinib group. In addition, 14.1% and 21.1% of patients in the LeToHAIC group achieved complete response of all lesions and complete response of the intrahepatic target lesions per modified RECIST criteria, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events that were more frequent in the LeToHAIC group than in the lenvatinib group included neutropenia (8.5% versus 1.2%), thrombocytopenia (5.6% versus 0), and nausea (5.6% versus 0).

Conclusions

Lenvatinib, toripalimab, plus HAIC had acceptable toxic effects and might improve survival compared with lenvatinib alone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatic Arterial Infusion of FOLFOX Combined Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX) plus sorafenib has a more desirable effect versus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein invasion. However, considering the high cost of hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy (HAIC), this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of HAIC plus sorafenib (SoraHAIC) versus standard care for HCC patients from the Chinese health system perspective.

Methods

A Markov multi-state model was constructed to simulate the disease course and source consumption of SoraHAIC. Costs of primary therapeutic drugs were calculated based on the national bid price, and hepatic artery catheterization fee was collected from the Fujian Provincial Price Bureau. Clinical data, other costs, and utility values were extracted from references. Primary outcomes included life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The robustness of model was verified by uncertainty sensitivity analyses.

Results

SoraHAIC gained 1.18 QALYs (1.68 LYs) at a cost of $65,254, while the effectiveness and cost of sorafenib were 0.52 QALYs (0.79 LYs) and $14,280, respectively. The ICER of SoraHAIC vs sorafenib was $77,132/QALY ($57,153/LY). Parameter that most influenced the ICER was utility of PFS state. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) showed that SoraHAIC was not cost-effective in the WTP threshold of 3*Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of China ($30,492/QALY). But about 38.8% of the simulations were favorable to SoraHAIC at the WTP threshold of 3*GDP per capita of Beijing ($72,000/QALY). When 3*GDP per capita of Fujian ($47,285/QALY) and Gansu Province ($14,595/QALY) were used as WTP threshold, the acceptability of SoraHAIC was 0.3% and 0%, respectively.

Conclusions

The study results indicated that SoraHAIC was not cost-effective in medium-, and low-income regions of China. In developed areas of China (Beijing), there was a 38.8% probability that the SoraHAIC regimen would be cost-effective.

Combination of HAI-FUDR and Systemic Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Dose Finding Single Center Study

BACKGROUND

Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma has a poor prognosis and treatment options are limited. Combined systemic and intrahepatic chemotherapy may improve local control and enable downsizing. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intravenous gemcitabine combined with intravenous cisplatin and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with floxuridine (FUDR) in patients with unresectable intrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Twelve patients were treated within a 3 + 3 dose escalation algorithm with 600, 800, or 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and predefined doses of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, q21, for 4 cycles, and FUDR 0.2 mg/kg on days 1-14 as continuous HAI, q28, for 3 cycles. Safety and toxicity as well as resectability rates after 3 months and preliminary survival data are reported.

RESULTS

The determined MTD for gemcitabine was 800 mg/m2. Dose limiting toxicities were neutropenic fever and biliary tract infections. In total, 27% of the patients showed partial remission and 73% stable disease. Although none of the patients achieved resectability after 3 months, the 3-year overall survival rate was 33%, median overall survival 23.9 months (range 1-49), and median progression-free survival 10.1 months (range 2-40).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous gemcitabine/cisplatin plus HAI-FUDR is feasible and appears effective for disease control. Larger prospective studies evaluating this triplet combination are warranted.

Evaluation of Antiemetic Therapy for Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin

Purpose

Our aim was to compare the antiemetic efficacy of the triple combination of aprepitant, dolasetron and dexamethasone with the combination of dolasetron and dexamethasone for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX).

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective study. In the dolasetron plus dexamethasone group (D group), the patients received dolasetron (100 mg, i.v., on day 1) and dexamethasone (10 mg, i.v., on day 1) 30 min before starting administration of chemotherapeutic drugs. In the aprepitant plus dolasetron and dexamethasone group (AD group), the patients received dolasetron and dexamethasone as described above, and aprepitant (125 mg, p.o.) on day 1 followed by 80 mg on days 2 and 3. The primary endpoint was the complete response rate (CR, defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication use) during the first cycle of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.

Results

Between January 2018 and August 2019, 302 eligible patients were included: 197 in AD group and 105 in D group. Patients in AD group had significantly higher complete response rates than those in D group during the first cycle (85.8% vs 71.4%, P = 0.003) and all cycles (73.6% vs 49.5%, P<0.001). Patients in AD group had lower rescue therapy (1.5% vs 26.7%, P<0.001) and lower incidence of disruption related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (0.5% vs 6.7%, P = 0.002) than patients in D group.

Conclusion

Aprepitant, dolasetron plus dexamethasone is more effective to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with FOLFOX-HAIC therapy than dolasetron plus dexamethasone.

INTRABEAM intraoperative radiotherapy combined with portal vein infusion chemotherapy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Background

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is common in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent studies indicate that more aggressive treatments, including surgical resection or locoregional treatment, may benefit selected HCC patients with PVTT. External radiation therapy and infusion chemotherapy were found to achieve good outcomes; however, the use of low-energy x-ray radiation system (INTRABEAM), intraoperative radiation therapy, and portal vein infusion chemotherapy for PVTT has not been reported.

Case summary

We present a case of HCC with PVTT. The patient underwent hemihepatectomy and thrombectomy along with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) using a portable INTRABEAM radiation system. Subsequently, to treat PVTT, portal vein infusion chemotherapy with FOLFOX (leucovorin [Folinic acid], fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) regimen was administered. There were no obvious post-operative complications. After 20 months follow-up period, no obvious tumor recurrence had been observed, and PVTT gradually disappeared completely.

Conclusions

IORT using the INTRABEAM radiation system combined with portal vein infusion chemotherapy is promising for select patients with PVTT.

Sorafenib combined with embolization plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is little evidence of combining sorafenib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is important to identify that patients with intermediate and advanced HCC are most likely to benefit from this combination therapy.

AIM

To investigate the safety and clinical outcomes of sorafenib combined with HAIC with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) after TACE for intermediate and advanced HCC.

METHODS

This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with intermediate and advanced HCC who underwent treatment with sorafenib combined with TACE-HAIC. All patients initially received the standard 400 mg dose of sorafenib twice daily before TACE-HAIC. Participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC underwent routine TACE. Then, the catheter used for embolization was kept in place in the hepatic artery, and oxaliplatin was intra-arterially administered for 6 h, followed by 5-FU for 18 h, and folinic acid was intravenously administered for 2 h. The primary endpoints were safety, as evaluated by the Common Terminology and Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, and 12-mo progression-free survival (PFS), as analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. As secondary endpoints, the objective response rate (ORR) was evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors, and survival time [overall survival (OS)] was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Sixty-six participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC were enrolled in this prospective study (mean age, 53.3 ± 11.7 years). Approximately 56.1% of participants had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease, and 43.9% had BCLC stage B disease. The ORR was 42.4%. The disease control rate was 87.9%. The grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia (4.5%), neutropenia (3.0%), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (12.2%). Hand-foot skin reaction was also observed (40.9%). The median PFS was 13.1 mo (13.5 mo in the BCLC stage B participants and 9.4 mo in the BCLC stage C participants). The 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo PFS rates were 75.0%, 54.7%, and 30.0%, respectively. The median OS was 21.8 mo.

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib combined with HAIC (FOLFOX) after TACE may be a feasible treatment choice for intermediate and advanced HCC because this treatment met the prespecified endpoint of a 6-mo PFS rate exceeding 50% and had good patient tolerance. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effect of this combination therapy.

Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin vs Sorafenib Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Sorafenib is the first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion; however, it has shown unsatisfactory survival benefit. Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) has shown promising results for these patients in a previous phase 2 study.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus HAIC compared with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized, open-label clinical trial enrolled 818 screened patients. Of the 818 participants, 247 with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein invasion were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated sequence to receive sorafenib plus HAIC or sorafenib. This trial was conducted at 5 hospitals in China and enrolled patients from April 1, 2016, to October 10, 2017, with a follow-up period of 10 months.

Interventions

Randomization to receive 400 mg sorafenib twice daily (sorafenib group) or 400 mg sorafenib twice daily plus HAIC (SoraHAIC group) (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 46 hours, every 3 weeks).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary endpoint was overall survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Results

For 247 patients (median age, 49 years; range, 18-75 years; 223 men and 24 women), median overall survival was 13.37 months (95% CI, 10.27-16.46) in the SoraHAIC group vs 7.13 months (95% CI, 6.28-7.98) in the sorafenib group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.26-0.48; P < .001). The SoraHAIC group showed a higher response rate than the sorafenib group (51 [40.8%] vs 3 [2.46%]; P < .001), and a longer median progression-free survival (7.03 [95% CI, 6.05-8.02] vs 2.6 [95% CI, 2.15-3.05] months; P < .001). Grade 3/4 adverse events that were more frequent in the SoraHAIC group than in the sorafenib group included neutropenia (12 [9.68%] vs 3 [2.48%]), thrombocytopenia (16 [12.9%] vs 6 [4.96%]), and vomiting (8 [6.45%] vs 1 [0.83%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

Sorafenib plus HAIC of FOLFOX improved overall survival and had acceptable toxic effects compared with sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein invasion.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02774187.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Hepatocellular Cancer with Extrahepatic Spread

PURPOSE

To compare treatment with hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with both extrahepatic spread (EHS) and intrahepatic tumor and patients with intrahepatic tumor only.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study comprised 116 patients with advanced HCC with both intrahepatic tumor and EHS (EHS group; n = 50) or with intrahepatic tumor only (non-EHS group; n = 66) treated with HAIC including oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin between June 2014 and July 2016. Overall survival (OS) and radiologic responses to treatment were determined and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Both the objective response rate and the clinical benefit rate were higher in the non-EHS group than in the EHS group (37.9% vs 16% objective response rate, P = .010; 81.8% vs 62% clinical benefit rate, P = .017). Median OS was not statistically different between the 2 groups (14.8 months vs 9.8 months, P = .068). Subgroup analysis of OS found that patients with lung metastases survived for a shorter time (OS 7 months) than patients with other metastatic sites (P = .003) and patients free of metastases (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC is a potential treatment option for advanced HCC with limited extrahepatic metastases in a population with hepatitis B virus infection.

Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin versus sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective

To compare the efficacy of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin to that of sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-center trial. Between April 3, 2017 and July 2, 2018, 104 patients with Child-Pugh A and advanced HCC received either 400 mg of sorafenib orally twice daily plus HAIC with oxaliplatin (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², every 3 weeks via repetitive catheterization) (n = 46, soraOXA group) or 400 mg of only sorafenib orally twice daily (n = 58, sorafenib group). Overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse events were compared.

Results

The median overall survival was 9.37 months (95% CI, 7.05–11.68) in the soraOXA group versus 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.98–6.62) in the sorafenib group (HR 0.46 [95% CI, 0.29–0.72]; P < 0.001). The soraOXA group also showed a higher objective response rate (16 [34.8%] vs 1 [1.7%]; P < 0.001) and a longer progression-free survival rate (5.5 months [95% CI, 2.32–8.68] vs 2.4 months [95% CI, 1.65–3.15], HR 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36–0.81], P = 0.003) than the sorafenib group. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of any grade adverse events, grade 3/4 adverse events, serious adverse events, or incidence of treatment termination due to adverse events between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared with sorafenib alone, sorafenib plus HAIC with oxaliplatin showed favorable treatment outcomes in patients with advanced HCC. The merits of this approach need to be established with a prospective trial.