Donor lymphocyte infusion for prevention of relapse after unmanipulated haploidentical PBSCT for very high-risk hematologic malignancies

Haploidentical transplantation: An optimal platform for graft manipulation and cellular therapies

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a curative therapeutic option for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. When a fully matched donor is unavailable, haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) provides a viable alternative. Over time, haplo-HCT procedures have significantly evolved, improving outcomes in treatment related mortality (TRM), especially in graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). However, challenges such as delayed immune reconstitution and disease relapse persist. Advances in in vivo graft manipulation techniques, such as post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and ex vivo approaches, including TCRα/β and CD19 depletion, have shown promise in reducing the risk of severe GvHD without increasing the relapse rates. Innovative strategies, such as haploidentical donor lymphocyte infusions, "suicide-switch" mechanisms, ORCA-Q product infusions, and CAR based therapies offer potential to further optimize outcomes. This review examines the graft manipulation modalities in the haplo-HCT setting, highlighting their role in advancing cellular therapies and providing new hope in the fight against life-threatening diseases.

How I reduce and treat posttransplant relapse of MDS

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only potentially curative option for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Advances in conditioning regimens and supportive measures have reduced treatment-related mortality and increased the role of transplantation, leading to more patients undergoing HSCT. However, posttransplant relapse of MDS remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for this procedure, necessitating expert management and ongoing results analysis. In this article, we review treatment options and our institutional approaches to managing MDS relapse after HSCT, using illustrative clinical cases that exemplify different clinical manifestations and management of relapse. We address areas of controversy relating to conditioning regimen intensity, chemotherapeutic bridging, and donor selection. In addition, we discuss future directions for advancing the field, including (1) the need for prospective clinical trials separating MDS from acute myeloid leukemia and focusing on posttransplant relapse, as well as (2) the validation of measurable residual disease methodologies to guide timely interventions.

Prophylactic versus Preemptive modified donor lymphocyte infusion for high-risk acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter retrospective study

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been widely used in preventing post-transplant relapse. We conducted this study to compare the superiority of prophylactic modified DLI (pro-DLI) and preemptive modified DLI (pre-DLI) in patients with high-risk relapse features acute leukemia. Pro-DLI was performed in 95 patients, whereas the pre-DLI cohort included 176 patients. In the pre-DLI cohort, 42 patients relapsed without chance for pre-DLI while 95 patients remained CR without detectable minimal residual disease (MRD). Thirty-nine patients in the pre-DLI cohort became minimal MRD positive/mixed chimerism and received pre-DLI. Pro-DLI cohort had higher 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) (63.4%vs.53.0%, P = 0.026) and overall survival (OS) (65.2% vs. 57.0%, P = 0.14) compared to the pre-DLI cohort. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 25.3% in the pro-DLI cohort which was significantly lower than 36.7% in the pre-DLI cohort (P = 0.02). The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD, cGVHD and non-relapse mortality were comparable between cohorts. Multivariable analysis demonstrated strong protective effect of pro-DLI on OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.63, P = 0.04), PFS (HR = 0.54, P = 0.005) and CIR (HR = 0.50, P = 0.005). In high-risk patients with acute leukemia, early scheduled pro-DLI rather than pre-DLI after detectable MRD would reduce post-transplant relapse and improve long-term survival.

Prophylactic or pre-emptive therapies to prevent relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potent curative treatment for hematological malignancies, but relapse is still a major problem. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and maintenance therapies after transplantation are promising strategies to reduce the risk of relapse. DLI augments the graft-versus-tumor effect by directly adding allo-reactive donor lymphocytes, and has been used in relapsed patients. In this Progress in Hematology (PIH), we will focus on prophylactic or pre-emptive DLI, including DLI from a haploidentical donor. On the other hand, specific drugs, which are used in maintenance therapies for each disease, kill tumor cells directly and/or immunologically by stimulating immune cells. Maintenance therapies should be started early after transplantation without severe myelosuppression. Molecularly targeted drugs are therefore suitable for use in maintenance therapies, and are reviewed in this PIH. The optimal application of these strategies has not yet been established. However, important evidence regarding their efficacies, adverse events, and effects on immune systems is accumulating, and could help to improve outcomes in allogeneic transplantation.

Pre-emptive and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is an allogenic immunotherapy used after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. DLI takes advantage of the graft-versus-tumor effect induced by the infused CD3 + T cells, but may induce graft-versus-host disease. To date, DLI has been attempted to prevent hematological relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with mixed chimerism and molecular relapse (pre-emptive DLI), and as maintenance therapy in patients with high-risk hematological malignancies (prophylactic DLI). DLI response and efficacy depend on patient, disease, and DLI factors. This review discusses the efficacy and risks of DLI, with a focus on pre-emptive and prophylactic use.

How I treat high-risk acute myeloid leukemia using preemptive adoptive cellular immunotherapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with high-risk acute leukemias, but unfortunately disease recurrence remains the major cause of death in these patients. Infusion of donor lymphocytes (DLI) has the potential to restore graft-versus-leukemia immunologic surveillance; however, efficacy varies across different hematologic entities. Although relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia, transplanted in chronic phase, has proven remarkably susceptible to DLI, response rates are more modest for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To prevent impending relapse, a number of groups have explored administering DLI preemptively on detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) or mixed chimerism. Evidence for the effectiveness of this strategy, although encouraging, comes from only a few, mostly single-center retrospective, nonrandomized studies. This article seeks to (1) discuss the available evidence supporting this approach while highlighting some of the inherent challenges of MRD-triggered treatment decisions post-transplant, (2) portray other forms of postremission cellular therapies, including the role of next-generation target-specific immunotherapies, and (3) provide a practical framework to support clinicians in their decision-making process when considering preemptive cellular therapy for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Transplant for TP53-mutated MDS and AML: because we can or because we should?

TP53 mutations impair the cellular response to genotoxic stress and drive intrinsic resistance to conventional cytotoxic therapies. Clinical outcomes in patients with TP53-mutated myeloid malignancies are poor and marked by high-risk clinical features, such as complex karyotype and prior exposure to leukemogenic therapies, and short survival due to a high risk of relapse after allogeneic transplantation. TP53 mutations are thus included as adverse markers in clinical prognostic models, including European LeukemiaNet recommendations and the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Recent data indicate that the TP53 allelic state, co-occurring somatic mutations, and the position of the TP53 mutation within the clonal hierarchy define genetic heterogeneity among TP53-mutated MDS and acute myeloid leukemia that may influence clinical outcomes, thereby informing the selection of patients most suitable for transplantation. Further, novel therapeutic methods such as antibody-based agents (monoclonals or dual-affinity retargeting antibodies), cellular therapies (natural killer cells, chimeric antigen receptor T cells), or targeted agents (eprenetapopt) may offer opportunities to modify the approach to pretransplant conditioning or posttransplant maintenance and improve clinical outcomes.

How I Treat TP53-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are among the myeloid malignancies with the poorest prognosis. In this review, we analyze the prognosis of these two diseases, focussing particularly on the extent of the mono or biallelic mutation status of TP53 mutation, which is largely correlated with cytogenetic complexity. We discuss the possible/potential improvement in outcome based on recent results obtained with new drugs (especially eprenetapopt and magrolimab). We also focus on the impact of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) including post aHSCT treatment.

Optimizing Blood Stem Cell Transplants Through Cellular Engineering

Haematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) are used in the treatment of blood cancers, autoimmune diseases, and metabolic disorders. Over 1.5 million transplants have been performed around the world thus far. In an attempt to enhance the efficacy of the cells used for transplantation, efforts are underway to use cellular engineering to increase cell numbers through: (1) the expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC); (2) cellular subset selection to remove cells that cause graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), while adding back cells, which can mediate anti-tumor and anti-viral immunity; (3) the use of immune regulatory cells, such as mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) to control GvHD; (4) the use of immune effector cells to mount immunological control of tumor cells before, after, or independent of blood stem cell transplants.

Haematologic malignancies with unfavourable gene mutations benefit from donor lymphocyte infusion with/without decitabine for prophylaxis of relapse after allogeneic HSCT: A pilot study

Relapse is the main cause of treatment failure for leukaemia patients with unfavourable gene mutations who receive allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). There is no consensus on the indication of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for prophylaxis of relapse after allo‐HSCT. To evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of prophylactic DLI in patients with unfavourable gene mutations such as FLT3‐ITD, TP53, ASXL1, DNMT3A or TET2, we performed a prospective, single‐arm study. Prophylactic use of decitabine followed by DLI was planned in patients with TP53 or epigenetic modifier gene mutations. The prophylaxis was planned in 46 recipients: it was administered in 28 patients and it was not administered in 18 patients due to contraindications. No DLI‐associated pancytopenia was observed. The cumulative incidences of grade II–IV and III–IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) at 100 days post‐DLI were 25.8% and 11.0%, respectively. The rates of chronic GVHD, non‐relapse mortality and relapse at 3 years post‐DLI were 21.6%, 25.0% and 26.1%, respectively. The 3‐year relapse‐free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were 48.9% and 48.2%, respectively. Acute GVHD (HR: 2.30, p = 0.016) and relapse (HR: 2.46, p = 0.003) after DLI were independently associated with inferior OS. Data in the current study showed the feasibility of prophylactic DLI with/without decitabine in the early stage after allo‐HSCT in patients with unfavourable gene mutations.

Comparison of Two Strategies for Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Acute Leukemia

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pDLI) could reduce relapse in patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia (RRAL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but optimal timing of pDLI remains uncertain. We compared the outcomes of two strategies for pDLI based on time from transplant and minimal residual disease (MRD) status in patients with RRAL. For patients without grade II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) on day +60, pDLI was given on day +60 regardless of MRD in cohort 1, and was given on day +90 unless MRD was positive on day +60 in cohort 2. A total of 161 patients with RRAL were enrolled, including 83 in cohort 1 and 78 in cohort 2. The extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) incidence in cohort 2 was lower than that in cohort 1 (10.3% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.006) and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) in cohort 2 was superior to that in cohort 1 (55.1% vs. 41.0%, P = 0.042). The 2-year relapse rate, overall and leukemia-free survival were comparable between the two cohorts (29.0% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.986; 63.9% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.863; 57.8% vs. 61.5%, P = 0.666). Delaying pDLI to day +90 based on MRD for patients with RRAL undergoing allo-HSCT could lower extensive cGVHD incidence and improve GRFS without increasing incidence of leukemia relapse compared with pDLI on day +60.

Prophylactic modified donor lymphocyte infusion after low-dose ATG-F-based haploidentical HSCT with myeloablative conditioning in high-risk acute leukemia: a matched-pair analysis

Both haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) exhibit strong graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. However, the role of prophylactic DLI following haploidentical HSCT remains unclear. Here, 34 patients with high-risk acute leukemia who underwent low-dose anti-T-lymphocyte globulin-Fresenius (ATG-F)-based myeloablative haploidentical HSCT and prophylactic modified DLI (pro-DLI) were well-matched with patients without pro-DLI. The 5-year overall survival (OS) (67.8% versus 41.3%, P < 0.01) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (64.6% versus 33.9%, P < 0.01) of pro-DLI cohort were superior to the control cohort. A slightly higher GVHD-free/relapse-free survival was found in the pro-DLI cohort (32.8% versus 16.3%, P = 0.32). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse of the pro-DLI recipients was significantly lower than that of the control cohort (14.7% versus 49.3%, P = 0.01). The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD at 100 days after pro-DLI was 17.6% and 9.1%, respectively. There was no difference between the two cohorts in terms of the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD and non-relapse mortality. Data from the multivariate analysis demonstrated that pro-DLI was an independent protective variable for LFS (P = 0.01, hazard ratio {HR} = 0.35), OS (P = 0.01, HR = 0.32), and relapse (P = 0.02, HR = 0.33). Taken together, we demonstrate that pro-DLI after ATG-F-based HSCT effectively decreases the risk of relapse and improves long-term survival of patients with high-risk acute leukemia without increasing treatment toxicity.

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion for relapse prevention: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Primary disease relapse (PDR) of malignant hematologic conditions after standard hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is one of the most challenging diseases; therefore ongoing researches are aiming at relapse prevention and minimizing the transplant-related side effects. Prophylactic donor lymphocytes (pDLI) had been proposed as a valuable strategy for PDR prevention, but early studies had been discouraging due to the limited benefit and possible association with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

METHOD

We performed a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Embase database from inception to May 2019 for studies that evaluated the association between pDLI and PDR. We conducted a random effect meta-analysis of 9 studies involving a total of 748 participants (pDLI = 398, non-pDLI = 350) and reported the pooled odd ratio (OR) for association of pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

RESULT

We found a significant decreased odd of PDR in the pDLI group (pooled OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.58, I2 = 0%), but there was no significant increased odd of aGVHD (pooled OR of 0.98, 95% CI 0.56-1.72, I2 = 0.8%). We also found that there was an increased odd of overall survival (OS) (pooled OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.85-5.45, I2 = 50.2%).

CONCLUSION

There are significantly decreased odd of PDR and increased odd of OS in the pDLI group compared to the control group, but there is no statistically significant increased odd of aGVHD as suggested by previous studies. We concluded that pDLI is a potentially valuable method for post-transplant PDR prevention.

Key Aspects of the Immunobiology of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a haploidentical donor is increasingly used and has become a standard donor option for patients lacking an appropriately matched sibling or unrelated donor. Historically, prohibitive immunological barriers resulting from the high degree of HLA-mismatch included graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) and graft failure. These were overcome with increasingly sophisticated strategies to manipulate the sensitive balance between donor and recipient immune cells. Three different approaches are currently in clinical use: (a) ex vivo T-cell depletion resulting in grafts with defined immune cell content (b) extensive immunosuppression with a T-cell replete graft consisting of G-CSF primed bone marrow and PBSC (GIAC) (c) T-cell replete grafts with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Intriguing studies have recently elucidated the immunologic mechanisms by which PTCy prevents GVHD. Each approach uniquely affects post-transplant immune reconstitution which is critical for the control of post-transplant infections and relapse. NK-cells play a key role in haplo-HCT since they do not mediate GVHD but can successfully mediate a graft-vs.-leukemia effect. This effect is in part regulated by KIR receptors that inhibit NK cell cytotoxic function when binding to the appropriate HLA-class I ligands. In the context of an HLA-class I mismatch in haplo-HCT, lack of inhibition can contribute to NK-cell alloreactivity leading to enhanced anti-leukemic effect. Emerging work reveals immune evasion phenomena such as copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity of the incompatible HLA alleles as one of the major mechanisms of relapse. Relapse and infectious complications remain the leading causes impacting overall survival and are central to scientific advances seeking to improve haplo-HCT. Given that haploidentical donors can typically be readily approached to collect additional stem- or immune cells for the recipient, haplo-HCT represents a unique platform for cell- and immune-based therapies aimed at further reducing relapse and infections. The rapid advancements in our understanding of the immunobiology of haplo-HCT are therefore poised to lead to iterative innovations resulting in further improvement of outcomes with this compelling transplant modality.

Clinical applications of donor lymphocyte infusion from an HLA-haploidentical donor: consensus recommendations from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Donor lymphocyte infusion has been used in the management of relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. It can eradicate minimal residual disease or be used to rescue a hematologic relapse, being able to induce durable remissions in a subset of patients. With the increased use of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation, there is renewed interest in the use of donor lymphocytes to either treat or prevent disease relapse post transplant. Published retrospective and small prospective studies have shown encouraging results with therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusion in different haploidentical transplantation platforms. In this consensus paper, finalized on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we summarize the available evidence on the use of donor lymphocyte infusion from haploidentical donor, and provide recommendations on its therapeutic, pre-emptive and prophylactic use in clinical practice.

Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the preferred curative treatment for several hematological malignancies. The efficacy of allo-SCT depends on the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. However, the prognosis of patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allo-SCT is poor. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is utilized after allo-SCT in this setting to prevent relapse, to prolong progression free survival, to establish full donor chimerism and to restore the GvL effect in patients with hematological malignancies. Thus, there are different options for the administration of DLI in AML patients. DLI is currently used prophylactically and in the setting of an overt relapse. In addition, in the minimal residual disease (MRD) setting, DLI may be a possibility to improve overall survival. However, DLI might increase the risk of severe life-threatening complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) as well as severe infections. The transfusion of lymphocytes has been tested not only for the treatment of hematological malignancies but also chronic infections. In this context, manipulated DLI in a prophylactic or therapeutic approach are an option, e.g., virus-specific DLI using different selection methods or antigen-specific DLI such as peptide-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). In addition, T cells are also genetically engineered, using both chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) genetically modified T cells and T cell receptor (TCR) genetically modified T cells. T cell therapies in general have the potential to enhance antitumor immunity, augment vaccine efficacy, and limit graft-versus-host disease after allo-SCT. The focus of this review is to discuss the different strategies to use donor lymphocytes after allo-SCT. Our objective is to give an insight into the functional effects of DLI on immunogenic antigen recognition for a better understanding of the mechanisms of DLI. To ultimately increase the GvL potency without raising the risk of GvHD at the same time.

Adoptive T Cell Therapy Following Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Delayed immune reconstitution and the consequently high rates of leukemia relapse and infectious complications are the main limitations of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Donor T cell addback can accelerate immune reconstitution but the therapeutic window between graft-vs.-host disease and protective immunity is very narrow in the haploidentical transplant setting. Hence, strategies to improve the safety and efficacy of adoptive T cell transfer are particularly relevant in this setting. Adoptive T cell transfer strategies in haploidentical transplantation include the use of antigen-specific T cells, allodepletion and alloanergy induction, immune modulation by the co-infusion of regulatory cell populations, and the use of safety switch gene-modified T cells. Whilst common principles apply, there are features that are unique to haploidentical transplantation, where HLA-mismatching directly impacts on immune reconstitution, and shared vs. non-shared HLA-allele can be an important consideration in antigen-specific T cell therapy. This review will also present an update on safety switch gene-modified T cells, which can be conditionally deleted in the event of severe graft- vs.-host disease or other adverse events. Herpes Virus Simplex Thymidine Kinase (HSVtk) and inducible caspase-9 (iCasp9) are safety switches that have undergone multicenter studies in haploidentical transplantation with encouraging results. These gene-modified cells, which are trackable long-term, have also provided important insights on the fate of adoptively transferred T cells. In this review, we will discuss the biology of post-transplant T cell immune reconstitution and the impact of HLA-mismatching, and the different cellular therapy strategies that can help accelerate T cell immune reconstitution after haploidentical transplantation.

Outcome and Prognostic Factors of High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background

Allogeneic transplantation remains one of the best therapies for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (HR-AML).

Material/Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed 126 patients with HR-AML after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCST).

Results

The disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 1 year and 3 years were 58.83% (95%CI: 50.75–68.20%) and 53.09% (95%CI: 44.59–63.22%) respectively. The cumulative relapse rates of 1 year and 3 years were 21.1% (95%CI: 14.4–28.8%) and 25.9% (95%CI: 18.1–34.5%) respectively. The cumulative incidences of III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) for 100 days was 8.70% (95%CI: 4.6–14.5%). The cumulative rate of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) for 1-year was 4.1% (95%CI: 1.5–8.7%). The cumulative transplantation related mortality rate of 1 year and 3 years were 20.1% (95%CI: 13.6–27.6%) and 21.0% (95%CI: 14.3–28.6%) respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that lower overall survival was correlated with age, bacterial or fungal infection, disease status at transplantation, III–IV aGVHD, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD), white blood cell engraftment, and extramedullary involvement (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis were that the aforementioned factors were also related to lower overall survival except for PTLD (P<0.05). The results of univariate and multivariate analysis were that extramedullary involvement, III–IV aGVHD, and status pre-transplantation influenced DFS (P<0.05). The risk factors for relapse were status pre-transplantation and extramedullary involvement by univariate and multivariate analysis (P<0.05).

Conclusions

HR-AML has inferior prognosis. Our study indicated the necessity of achieving remission status prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and administration of preventive treatments on high-risk patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In addition, adequate prevention and treatment of complications are needed.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion after haploidentical versus matched-sibling PBSCT in very high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) might be used prophylactically to reduce relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for very high-risk leukemia/lymphoma without effective targeted therapy. To compare the safety and efficacy of prophylactic DLI for prevention of relapse after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donors (HID-SCT) and matched-sibling donors (MSD-SCT) in patients with very high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we performed a retrospective analysis in a cohort of 21 HID-SCT and 13 MSD-SCT recipients, displaying similar baseline characteristics except for donor's gender distribution. Grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100-day post-DLI was higher in HID-SCT group than that in MSD-SCT group (59.5% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.05). The grade 3-4 acute GVHD (17.5% vs. 7.7%), 1-year chronic GVHD (36.6% vs. 33.2%), and severe chronic GVHD (15.3% vs. 27.3%) were not statistically significant different between groups. One-year non-relapse mortality was higher in HID-SCT group than that in MSD-SCT group with marginal significance (27.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.061). One-year relapse rate was not statistically significant different between HID-SCT group and MSD-SCT group (21.6% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.543). For HID-SCT recipients, 1-year relapse rate was lower in patients receiving prophylactic DLI than that in a control cohort of eight patients with same very high-risk features but not receiving prophylactic DLI (62.5% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.037). No statistically significant difference was observed in 1-year overall survival (OS, 55.1% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.325) and relapse-free survival (RFS, 50.1% vs. 74.0%, p = 0.419) rates between HID-SCT group and MSD-SCT group. In multivariate analyses, non-remission status prior to transplant, poor-risk gene mutations, and donor's age ≥ 48 years predicted a higher risk of relapse after DLI. Non-remission status prior to transplant predicted inferior OS and RFS. Patient's age ≥ 40 years also predicted an inferior OS. In conclusion, prophylactic DLI was very safe and efficient for reducing relapse in patients with very high-risk AML receiving MSD-SCT. In the recipients of HID-SCT, the application of prophylactic DLI could reduce the risk of relapse, although with a higher incidence of DLI-associated acute GVHD than those of MSD-SCT.