Advanced Hodgkin lymphoma in the East of England: a 10-year comparative analysis of outcomes for real-world patients treated with ABVD or escalated-BEACOPP, aged less than 60 years, compared with 5-year extended follow-up from the RATHL trial

Real-World Outcomes of PET-Adapted Treatment for Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Study From a Single Tertiary Care Center

Background  Classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (CHL) is frequently treated using a positron emission tomography (PET)-directed approach, as demonstrated in the Response-Adapted Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma (RATHL) trial. This study aimed to compare real-world patient outcomes with those reported in the RATHL trial for individuals with advanced-stage disease. Methods This retrospective study included 169 adult patients aged 18 years and older (range 20-66 years). Only patients who received treatment and subsequent follow-up at our institution were included in this study. Results The study population had a male-to-female ratio of 1.86:1, with a median age of 30 years. B symptoms were present in 119 patients (70.4%), while bulky disease (>33% of the transthoracic diameter or >10 cm elsewhere) was observed in 55 patients (32.5%). More than half (57.4%) had stage IV disease at diagnosis, and the median follow-up time was 4.79 years. The three-year overall survival rate was 92.3%, and the progression-free survival rate was 76.9%. Among the 49 patients in the interim PET-positive group, the three-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 83.7% and 57.1%, respectively. Of these, 17 (34.7%) received escalated therapy with bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP), while 32 (65.7%) continued with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) or standard BEACOPP. No significant survival difference was observed between these treatment groups. In the interim PET-negative group of 104 patients, 84 (80.8%) received ABVD, while 20 (19.2%) received doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD). Again, no significant difference in survival was noted between these two groups. When comparing the interim PET-positive cohort to the RATHL trial, the three-year overall survival rates were 83.7% versus 87.8% (p = 0.45), and the progression-free survival rates were 57.1% versus 67.5% (p = 0.17), with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion This study highlights excellent real-world outcomes for treating CHL using a PET-directed approach similar to the RATHL trial. However, despite PET-guided therapy, interim PET positivity remained associated with significantly lower overall survival and progression-free survival rates. De-escalation to AVD in the interim PET-negative group did not negatively affect survival outcomes. ABVD remains a viable treatment option for PET-positive patients with good tolerance, strong response, or near-complete remission with single-site residual disease, without compromising survival.

Integrating Novel Agents Into the Clinical Management of Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is highly curable at all stages. Research efforts over the past few decades have largely focused on interim PET-adapted strategies for therapy de-escalation or intensification. The overarching goals have been to increase cure rates, minimize potential therapy-related effects, and optimize survivorship. Better understanding of the biology of cHL has led to the development and approval of effective novel agents including the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin and the checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies. In this review, we discuss recent trial results and how these agents are integrated into clinical practice with the goal of further optimizing outcomes.

The genomic and clinical consequences of replacing procarbazine with dacarbazine in escalated BEACOPP for Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Procarbazine-containing chemotherapy regimens are associated with cytopenias and infertility, suggesting stem-cell toxicity. When treating Hodgkin lymphoma, procarbazine in escalated-dose bleomycin-etoposide-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-vincristine-procarbazine-prednisolone (eBEACOPP) is increasingly replaced with dacarbazine (eBEACOPDac) to reduce toxicity. We aimed to investigate the impact of this drug substitution on the mutation burden in stem cells, patient survival, and toxicity.

METHODS

In this two-part retrospective, observational study, we first compared mutational landscapes in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in remission for at least 6 months who had been treated with eBEACOPDac (eBEACOPDac cohort), eBEACOPP (real-world eBEACOPP cohort), or doxorubicin-bleomycin-vinblastine-dacarbazine (ABVD); in buccal DNA from five children of a female patient with classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated with eBEACOPP before conceiving the third child; in sperm DNA from a patient with mild oligospermia treated with eBEACOPP; and in caecal adenocarcinoma and healthy colon tissue from a survivor of Hodgkin lymphoma treated with chlorambucil-vinblastine-procarbazine-prednisolone. For the second part, we analysed efficacy and toxicity data from adult patients (aged >16 years) treated with first-line eBEACOPDac (eBEACOPDac cohort) at 25 centres across UK, Ireland, and France; efficacy was compared with the German HD18 eBEACOPP trial data and toxicity with a UK real-world dataset. Participants in the German HD18 and UK real-world datasets were adults (aged >16 years) with previously untreated Hodgkin lymphoma, treated with first-line eBEACOPP. We had two co-primary objectives: to define the comparative stem-cell mutation burden and mutational signatures after treatment with or without procarbazine-containing chemotherapy (first study part); and to determine progression-free survival of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with eBEACOPP or eBEACOPDac (second study part). Secondary objectives included overall survival and explored differences in specific toxicity outcomes, including transfusion requirements and measures of reproductive health (second study part).

FINDINGS

In the first part of the study (mutational analysis), patients treated with eBEACOPP (n=5) exhibited a higher burden of point mutations in HSPCs compared with those treated with eBEACOPDac (n=4) or ABVD (n=3; excess mutations 1150 [95% CI 934-1366] vs 290 [241-339] vs 186 [116-254]). Two novel mutational signatures, SBSA (SBS25-like) and SBSB, were identified in HSPCs and in a single neoplastic and healthy colon sample from patients who received procarbazine-containing chemotherapy. SBSB was also identified in germline DNA of three children conceived after eBEACOPP and in sperm of a male patient treated with eBEACOPP. SBSC was detected in patients treated with either ABVD or eBEACOPDac. In the second part of the study (efficacy and toxicity analysis), dacarbazine substitution did not appear to compromise efficacy or safety. 312 patients treated with eBEACOPDac (eBEACOPDac cohort; treated 2017-22, 186 [60%] male, median follow-up 36·0 months [IQR 25·2-50·1]) had a 3-year progression-free survival of 93·3% (95% CI 90·3-96·4), which was similar to the 93·3% [95% CI 92·1-94·4]) progression-free survival seen in 1945 patients in the German HD18 eBEACOPP trial (treated 2008-14, 1183 [61%] male, median follow-up 57·0 months [35·4-64·7]). Patients treated with eBEACOPDac required fewer blood transfusions (mean 1·70 units [SD 2·77] vs 3·69 units [3·89]; p<0·0001), demonstrated higher post-chemotherapy sperm concentrations (median 23·4 million per mL [IQR 11·0-632·3] vs 0·0 million per mL [0·0-0·001]; p=0·0040), and had earlier resumption of menstrual periods (mean 5·04 months [SD 3·07] vs 8·77 months [5·57]; p=0·0036) compared with 73 patients treated with eBEACOPP in the UK real-world dataset.

INTERPRETATION

Procarbazine induces a higher mutation burden and novel mutational signatures in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with eBEACOPP and their germline DNA, raising concerns for the genomic health of survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma and hereditary consequences for their offspring. However, replacing procarbazine with dacarbazine appears to mitigate gonadal and stem-cell toxicity while maintaining similar clinical efficacy.

FUNDING

Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust and Wellcome Trust.

The role of response adapted therapy in the era of novel agents

The optimal treatment of classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) requires an individualized approach, with therapy guided by pretreatment clinical risk stratification and interim response assessment with positron emission tomography (PET). The overall goal is to achieve high cure rates while minimizing acute toxicity and late therapy-related effects. Interim PET-adapted strategies (iPET) were initially developed with traditional chemotherapy, reducing intensity after interim complete response and escalating treatment for patients with iPET+ disease. Recently, novel agents including brentuximab vedotin and the checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies (CPIs) pembrolizumab and nivolumab have been adopted into the front-line treatment of cHL, and PET-adapted approaches may be relevant for these drugs as well. In this review we discuss response-adapted strategies utilizing novel agents, consider challenges including indeterminate radiographic findings with CPIs, and address emerging techniques for response assessment including new PET-based imaging metrics and the role of circulating tumor DNA.

T-cell receptor gamma gene rearrangement analysis of classic Hodgkin lymphoma using a BIOMED-2 assay: a paraffin-embedded tissue analysis of one hundred cases

In the new WHO classifications of haematolymphoid tumours (WHO-HAEM5), classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is categorized into B-cell lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas. Although the majority of Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells are of germinal center B-cell origin with some defects of B-cell transcription factors, they rarely express T-cell antigens or cytotoxic molecules. Clonality analyses on cHL samples using BIOMED-2 have been reported by several groups; however, those studies were only focused on Ig regions, including IgH, Ig-kappa, and Ig-lambda, and TCR-γ clonality analysis of cHL has not yet been explored. Here, we investigated TCR-γ gene rearrangement for one hundred cases using a PCR-based method. Four of one hundred (4%) cases showed TCR-γ clonal peaks. Of these, three were at an advanced stage and one patient died of the disease. To clarify whether HRS cells showed T-cell clonality or not, we performed PCR analysis using DNAs of microdissected HRS cells. Three samples showed identical clonal peaks with bulk specimens. Our results indicate that cHL is a heterogeneous disease of mainly B-cell and rarely T-cell origin with a special phenotype. Further molecular studies are warranted.

Clinical characteristics of Australian treatment-naïve patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma from the lymphoma and related diseases registry

Comprehensive clinical characteristics of Australian patients with classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) have not previously been systematically collected and described. We report real-world data of 498 eligible patients from the first 5 years of the Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry (LaRDR), including baseline characteristics, histologic subtype, and treatment patterns in first-line therapy. Patient demographics and distribution of histopathological subtypes of cHL are similar to reported international cohorts. Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) was the most common therapy for both early and advanced-stage disease, and 48% of patients with the early-stage disease received radiotherapy. Treatment patterns are consistent with international guidelines. In comorbid patients ≥60 years of age with advanced-stage disease, there is greater variation in treatment. In patients with a recorded response, the objective response rate (ORR) was 96% in early-stage disease, and 88% in advanced-stage disease. Early progression-free survival data suggest Australian patients with cHL have good outcomes, similar to other international studies.

Minimising the Toxicities of First Line Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment in the Modern Era

Striking advances in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma over the last 30 years have culminated in high rates of disease-free survival in younger patients with early and advanced stage disease. In this review we focus on strategies that have evolved over recent years to reduce short and long-term toxicities of treatment. These strategies include the selection of first-line chemotherapy, the stratification of patients based on initial response and subsequent adaptation of treatment, the addition of novel agents (e.g., brentuximab vedotin), the removal of specific drugs (e.g., bleomycin), the use of drug substitution, and the removal of consolidation radiotherapy based on interim and end of treatment PET assessment. While these strategies have successfully reduced toxicity of Hodgkin lymphoma therapy, the cornerstone of treatment continues to be combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy with significant short- and long-term side effects. To further reduce toxicity while maintaining or improving efficacy, we shall need to incorporate novel agents into our first-line treatment algorithms, and several such potentially practice-changing trials are underway.

Guideline for the first-line management of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma - A British Society for Haematology guideline

This guideline was compiled according to the British Society for Haematology (BSH) process at https://b-s-h.org.uk/media/16732/bsh-guidance-development-process-dec-5-18.pdf. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org. Recommendations are based on a review of the literature using Medline, PubMed/Medline and Cochrane searches beginning from 2013 up to January 2021. The following search terms were used: [Hodgkin lymphoma OR Hodgkin disease] NOT non-Hodgkin; AND [chemotherapy OR radiotherapy]; AND [elderly]; AND [teenage OR adolescent OR young adult]; AND [pregnancy]. Filters were applied to include only publications written in English, studies carried out in humans, clinical conferences, congresses, clinical trials, clinical studies, meta-analyses, multicentre studies and randomised controlled trials. References pre-2013 were taken from the previous version of this guideline.¹ Review of the manuscript was performed by the British Society for Haematology (BSH) Guidelines Committee Haematology Oncology Taskforce, the BSH Guidelines Committee and the Haematology Oncology sounding board of BSH.

Vincristine in Combination Therapy of Cancer: Emerging Trends in Clinics

Treatment of blood malignancies and other cancer diseases has been mostly unfeasible, so far. Therefore, novel treatment regimens should be developed and the currently used ones should be further elaborated. A stable component in various cancer treatment regimens consists of vincristine, an antimitotic compound of natural origin. Despite its strong anticancer activity, mostly, it cannot be administered as monotherapy due to its unspecific action and severe side effects. However, vincristine is suitable for combination therapy. Multidrug treatment regimens including vincristine are standardly applied in the therapy of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies, in which it is combined with drugs of different mechanisms of action, mainly with DNA-interacting compounds (for example cyclophosphamide), or drugs interfering with DNA synthesis (for example methotrexate). Besides, co-administration of vincristine with monoclonal antibodies has also emerged, the typical example of which is the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Although in some combination anticancer therapies, vincristine has been replaced with other drugs exhibiting lesser side effects, though, in most cases, it is still irreplaceable. This is strongly evidenced by the number of active clinical trials evaluating vincristine in combination cancer therapy. Therefore, in this article, we have reviewed the most common cancer treatment regimens employing vincristine and bring an overview of current trends in the clinical development of this compound.