Clinical outcomes in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia treated with ponatinib in routine clinical practice-data from a Belgian registry

Arterio-occlusive events among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia on tyrosine kinase inhibitors

ABSTRACT

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Each of these drugs has a specific profile of tyrosine kinases that they inhibit and, although all are clinically effective, they each have unique toxicity profiles. With the introduction of ponatinib, arterio-occlusive events were first noted and later found to occur with all TKIs to various extents. The recognition of this "class effect" was delayed considering ponatinib was introduced 10 years after the introduction of imatinib. The reasons for the delay in identification of this class effect are likely multifaceted. Importantly, there is an inconsistency in adverse event reporting criteria among the major clinical trials of the various TKIs, likely resulting in mixed reporting of arterio-occlusive events. Reporting events based on a frequency threshold, lack of sufficient follow-up, attempts at causality attribution, and the primary focus on molecular response may all have played an additional role. Considering the increasing rate of arterio-occlusive events over time, the termination of many trials after only 5 years prevents full assessment of the impact of these events. A comprehensive evaluation of TKI adverse effects using uniform Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms and comprehensive adjudication of these events may be helpful in better assessing the real risk for patients with each TKI. Future clinical trials should use a uniform and comprehensive approach to reporting adverse events without attempting to assign causality to the study drug.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different doses of ponatinib versus other tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ponatinib was recommended with caution because of its high risk of causing arterial occlusion events in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. The purpose of this study was to understand the efficacy and safety of different doses of ponatinib in the treatment of CML, and to compare it with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHOD

A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted by searching randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ponatinib in patients with CML to compare the efficacy and safety of ponatinib, and ranked under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to evaluate the optimal treatment.

RESULTS

A total of seven articles with eight RCTs were included in this study, involving 45 mg, 30 mg and 15 mg ponatinib doses. Seven outcome indexes were analyzed. The results showed that 45 mg ponatinib was superior to other doses of ponatinib and other TKIs in CCyR, MCyR and CHR, but the incidence of SAEs and AOEs was significantly higher than other treatment regimens.

CONCLUSION

Ponatinib, with an initial dosage of 45 mg and a gradual reduction to 15 mg, may be a more favorable option for patients with CML at all stages of disease progression, rather than just those in the chronic phase of CML.

Therapy for patients with chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia previously treated with ⩾2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic literature review

Background

ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the current standard of care for patients with chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) in the first-line and second-line (2 L) setting. Treatment after 2 L is not clearly established.

Objective

The objective of this study was to summarize the available evidence to compare the efficacy and safety of interventions in the treatment of CP-CML patients who had received ⩾2 prior TKIs.

Design

A systematic literature review was performed.

Data source and methods

A systematic literature review (SLR) of studies published until May 2021, reporting clinical outcomes in adult patients with CP-CML who had received ⩾ 2 prior TKIs was performed. Studies were identified through the database searches via Ovid platform (Embase, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), bibliographic search of relevant reviews, and proceedings from the previous 3 years of the key conferences in the field of oncology.

Results

Our search identified 38 relevant studies. Among the identified studies of the current third-line treatments, the major molecular response (MMR) rate for ponatinib was 19.0-66.7%, 23.3-25.5% for asciminib, 19.2% for omacetaxine, and 13.2% for bosutinib at 6 months. The complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate was 21.4-64.8% for ponatinib, 38.7-40.8% for asciminib, 18-24.2% for bosutinib, and 16.1% for omacetaxine at 6 months.

Conclusion

The findings from current SLR demonstrated the lack of data for patients with CML treated with ⩾2 TKIs. TKIs such as asciminib, ponatinib, and bosutinib are valid options for those patients. Further research is needed to identify the best treatment option for patients with CML receiving later lines of therapy.

Real-world Management of CML: Outcomes and Treatment Patterns

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a disease that previously signified a poor prognosis, but treatment options and outcomes have improved over the last several decades. Despite this, challenges remain in optimal management in clinical practice, as the characteristics in trial populations differ from patients who are treated in a real-world setting. This review describes recent updates in real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with CML.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several analyses describing real-world practice patterns show that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the most commonly prescribed agents in multiple lines of therapy. First-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) TKIs are the most commonly prescribed, even in the third line and beyond. Third-generation (3G) TKIs are typically utilized in patients with resistant disease who are younger with fewer comorbidities. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is utilized significantly less, given other treatment options available. The goals of treatment with CML have shifted to quality of life, cost savings, and treatment-free response (TFR). Despite clear guidelines for attempting TFR, discontinuation practice patterns remain inconsistent. TKIs are the mainstay of CML treatment, including those in later lines of therapy. In real-world practice, several challenges still remain with regard to optimal management. Specifically, ideal sequencing of treatments, side effect profiles of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), current role and timing of transplant, and adherence to recommendations for attempting to achieve a treatment-free response (TFR). A national registry could characterize these practice patterns in order to find ways to optimize care for CML patients.

Toxicity of targeted anticancer treatments on the liver in myeloproliferative neoplasms

The liver has a central role in metabolism, therefore, it is susceptible to harmful effects of ingested medications (drugs, herbs, and nutritional supplements). Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) comprises a range of unexpected reactions that occur after exposure to various classes of medication. Even though most cases consist of mild, temporary elevations in liver enzyme markers, DILI can also manifest as acute liver failure in some patients and can be associated with mortality. Herein, we briefly review available data on DILI induced by targeted anticancer agents in managing classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: Chronic myeloid leukemia, polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis.

Real-world experience with ponatinib therapy in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: impact of depth of response on survival and prior exposure to nilotinib on arterial occlusive events

We surveyed the performance of ponatinib, as salvage therapy, in a real-world setting of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP). Among 55 consecutive patients (median age 49 years) with relapsed/refractory CML-CP, 35 (64%) had failed ≥3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), 35 (64%) were pre-treated with nilotinib, and 14 (28%) harbored ABL1T315I. At start of ponatinib (median dose 30 mg/day), 40 patients were already in complete hematologic (CHR), 4 in complete cytogenetic (CCyR), 3 in major molecular (MMR) remission, while 8 had not achieved CHR (NR). Ponatinib improved the depth of response in 13 (33%), 3 (75%), 2 (66%), and 4 (50%) patients with CHR, CCyR, MMR, and NR, respectively (p = 0.02). At a median follow-up of 42 months, 13 (23%) deaths, 5 (9%) blast transformations, and 25 (45%) allogeneic transplants were recorded. Five/10-year post-ponatinib survival was 77%/58% with no significant difference when patients were stratified by allogeneic transplant (p = 0.94), ponatinib-induced deeper response (p = 0.28), or a post-ponatinib ≥CCyR vs CHR remission state (p = 0.25). ABL1T315I was detrimental to survival (p = 0.04) but did not appear to affect response. Prior exposure to nilotinib was associated with higher risk of arterial occlusive events (AOEs; 11% vs 0%; age-adjusted p = 0.04). Ponatinib starting/maintenance dose (45 vs 15 mg/day) did not influence either treatment response or AOEs. Our observations support the use of a lower starting/maintenance dose for ponatinib in relapsed/refractory CML-CP but a survival advantage for deeper responses was not apparent and treatment might not overcome the detrimental impact of ABL1T315I on survival. The association between prior exposure to nilotinib and a higher risk of post-ponatinib AOEs requires further validation.

Management of chronic myeloid leukemia in 2023 - common ground and common sense

With the improving knowledge of CML and its management, the goals of therapy need to be revisited to ensure an optimal use of the BCR::ABL1 TKIs in the frontline and later-line therapy of CML. In the frontline therapy of CML in the chronic phase (CML-CP), imatinib and the three second-generation TKIs (bosutinib, dasatinib and nilotinib) are associated with comparable survival results. The second-generation TKIs may produce earlier deep molecular responses, hence reducing the time to reaching a treatment-free remission (TFR). The choice of the second-generation TKI versus imatinib in frontline therapy is based on the treatment aims (survival, TFR), the CML risk, the drug cost, and the toxicity profile with respect to the patient's comorbidities. The TKI dosing is more flexible than has been described in the registration trials, and dose adjustments can be considered both in the frontline and later-line settings (e.g., dasatinib 50 mg frontline therapy; dose adjusted schedules of bosutinib and ponatinib), as well as during an ongoing TKI therapy to manage toxicities, before considering changing the TKI. In patients who are not candidates for TFR, BCR::ABL1 (International Scale) transcripts levels <1% are acceptable, result in virtually similar survival as with deeper molecular remissions, and need not warrant a change of TKI. For patients with true resistance to second-generation TKIs or with the T315I gatekeeper mutation, the third-generation TKIs are preferred. Ponatinib should be considered first because of the cumulative experience and results in the CML subsets, including in T315I-mutated CML. A response-based dosing of ponatinib is safe and leads to high TKI compliance. Asciminib is a third-generation TKI with possibly a better toxicity profile, but lesser activity in T315I-mutated CML. Olverembatinib is another potent third-generation TKI with early promising results.

Ponatinib-Induced Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)

Ponatinib is a highly potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor shown to have excellent outcomes in the treatment of acute and chronic leukemias. Despite its high efficacy, ponatinib has been shown to carry an increased risk for cardiovascular adverse events, not attributable to a known mechanism. We present a case of a patient with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who developed a cerebrovascular condition while receiving maintenance therapy with the lowest treatment dose of ponatinib for a prolonged duration.

Adaptive therapy to circumvent drug resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer: is it clinically relevant?

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is highly adaptable and is constantly evolving against current targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Despite advances in recent decades, the emergence of drug resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors constantly hampers therapeutic efficacy of cancer treatment. Continuous therapy versus intermittent clinical regimen has been a debate in drug administration of cancer patients. An ecologically-inspired shift in cancer treatment known as 'adaptive therapy' intends to improve the drug administration of drugs to cancer patients that can delay emergence of drug resistance.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss improved understanding of the concept of drug resistance, the basis of continuous therapy, intermittent clinical regimens, and adaptive therapy will be reviewed. In addition, we discuss how adaptive therapy provides guidance for future cancer treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

The current understanding of drug resistance in cancer leads to poor prognosis and limited treatment options in patients. Fighting drug resistance mutants is constantly followed by new forms of resistance. In most reported cases, continuous therapy leads to drug resistance and an intermittent clinical regimen vaguely delays it. However, adaptive therapy, conceptually, exploits multiple parameters that can suppress the growth of drug resistance and provides safe treatment for cancer patients in the future.

The proteolysis targeting chimera GMB-475 combined with dasatinib for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with BCR::ABL1 mutants

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) show resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting ABL1 due to the emergence of BCR::ABL1 mutants, especially compound mutants during the treatment, which brings great challenges to clinical practice. Combination therapy is an effective strategy for drug resistance. GMB-475, a proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) targeting the myristoyl pocket of ABL1 in an allosteric manner, degrades the BCR::ABL1 through the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway. In this study, we combined GMB-475 with orthosteric TKIs targeting ABL1 to overcome resistance. We constructed Ba/F3 cells carrying BCR::ABL1 mutants by gene cloning technology and compared the effects of combination therapy with those of monotherapy on the biological characteristics and signaling pathways in CML cells. We found that the effects of ABL1 inhibitors, including imatinib, dasatinib, ponatinib, and ABL001, on growth inhibition and promoting apoptosis of Ba/F3 cells with BCR::ABL1 mutants, especially compound mutants, were weakened. GMB-475 combined with TKIs, especially dasatinib, synergistically inhibited growth, promoted apoptosis, and blocked the cell cycle of Ba/F3 cells carrying BCR::ABL1 mutants and synergistically blocked multiple molecules in the JAK-STAT pathway. In conclusion, dasatinib enhanced the antitumor effect of GMB-475; that is, the combination of PROTAC targeting ABL1 in an allosteric manner and orthosteric TKIs, especially dasatinib, provides a novel idea for the treatment of CML patients with BCR::ABL1 mutants in clinical practice.

Management of chronic myeloid leukaemia patients treated with ponatinib in a real-life setting: A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA)

Real-world data on daily practice management, treatment modifications and outcome of a large cohort of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients treated with ponatinib was performed through monitoring Registries of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Overall, 666 CML subjects were included in the ponatinib registry from February 2015 to December 2020 and were eligible for analysis: 515 in chronic phase (CP), 50 in accelerated phase (AP) and 101 in blast crisis (BC). Median age at baseline was 58.7 years with a predominance of male subjects (57.1%). The median time from diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 2.35 years: 259 (38.9%) subjects had received two previous lines of treatment, 260 (39.0%) three lines and 147 (22.1%) four or more lines. A molecular response [from major molecular response (MMR) to a score of ≤0.01% on the international reporting scale (IS)] was reported for 59% of patients out of 593 patients analysed. With a median follow-up of 14.4 months, 136 subjects (20.4%) required at least one dose reduction due to adverse events (AEs), whereas 309 patients (46.4%) required dose reduction in the absence of any evidence of side effects. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 261 patients (39%). This real-life analysis shows that dose reductions were made primarily as a precaution rather than due to the occurrence of adverse reactions.

The Outcomes of Ponatinib Therapy in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Resistant or Intolerant to Previous Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, Treated in Poland Within the Donation Program

INTRODUCTION

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have greatly improved the treatment outcome for most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Ponatinib is a new pan-inhibitor of TK active in resistant CML. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ponatinib in patients suffering from CML.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, non-randomized, observational, retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ponatinib administered in adult CML patients in any disease phase, including those with a detected ABL T315I mutation, which were resistant or intolerant to previous-generation TKIs. The study comprised 43 patients benefiting from the ponatinib donation program who were treated in 16 Polish centers.

RESULTS

For patients who started treatment with ponatinib in chronic phase (CP) (n = 23) and in accelerated phase (AP) (n = 3) the median time on ponatinib was 19.5 months (range: 1.0-35.4), and 31.7 months (range: 31.0-34.1), respectively. All these patients were in CP after 1 month of treatment and at the end of observation - none of them progressed to AP or blastic phase (BP) during the study, meaning that progression-free survival was 100% at the end of observation (35.4 months). The estimated 2-year survival in this group of patients was 84%. For all 43 patients, median survival was not reached (lower quartile 6.3 months), and estimated 2-year survival was 60%.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis confirmed ponatinib efficacy in a significant proportion of patients heavily pre-treated with TKIs achieving durable responses in both CP and AP/BP CML groups.