A phase I study of the effect of repeated oral doses of pantoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of fedratinib in healthy male subjects

Proton pump inhibitor attenuates acidic microenvironment to improve the therapeutic effects of MSLN-CAR-T cells on the brain metastasis

The incidence of brain metastasis (BM) is gradually increasing, and the prognosis and therapeutic effect are poor. The emergence of immunotherapy has brought hope for the development of BM treatments. This study revealed that compared with primary cancers, BMs have a colder and more acidic tumor microenvironment (TME), resulting in reduced protein levels of mesothelin (MSLN), a promising target for chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with BMs. These factors could significantly decrease the efficiency of MSLN-CAR-T cells in TNBC BMs. Pantoprazole (PPZ) administration at the most commonly used dose in the clinic notably increased the pH of the TME, inhibited lysosomal activity, increased the membrane levels of the MSLN protein and improved the killing ability of MSLN-CAR-T cells both in vitro and in vivo. Similar results were obtained in non-small cell lung cancer BMs. Hence, when administered in combination with CAR-T cells, PPZ, which increases the protein levels of target antigens, may constitute a new immunotherapeutic strategy for treating solid tumors with BMs.

Advancements in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for fedratinib: updating dose guidance in the presence of a dual inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19

PURPOSE

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for fedratinib was updated and revalidated to bridge a gap between the observed drug-drug interaction (DDI) of a single sub-efficacious dose in healthy participants and the potential DDI in patients with cancer at steady state. The study aimed to establish an appropriate dose for fedratinib in patients coadministered with dual CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inhibitors, providing quantitative evidence to inform dosing guidance.

METHODS

The original minimal PBPK model was developed using Simcyp® Simulator v17. The model was updated by substituting a single distribution rate (Qsac) with 2 separate rates (CLin/CLout) and transitioning to v20. Model parameter updates were further informed with 3 clinical studies, and 3 more studies served as independent validation data. The validated model was applied to simulate potential DDIs between fedratinib and a known dual inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 (fluconazole).

RESULTS

Coadministration of fedratinib with fluconazole in patients was predicted to increase fedratinib exposure by < 2-fold in all simulated scenarios. For patients with cancer receiving the approved dose of fedratinib 400 mg once daily along with fluconazole 200 mg daily, the model predicted an approximate 50% increase in fedratinib exposure at steady state.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated PBPK model improved description of the observed pharmacokinetics and predicted a low risk of clinically significant DDIs between fedratinib and fluconazole. The quantitative evidence serves as a primary foundation for providing dose guidance in clinical practice for the coadministration of fedratinib with dual CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inhibitors.

Relative bioavailability of fedratinib through various alternative oral administration methods in healthy adults

Fedratinib is an oral Janus kinase 2-selective inhibitor for the treatment of adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis; however, some patients have difficulty with oral dosing. This randomized, phase 1, open-label, 2-part crossover study evaluated the relative bioavailability, safety, tolerability, taste, and palatability of fedratinib resulting from various alternative oral administration methods in healthy adults. Participants could receive fedratinib 400 mg orally as intact capsules along with a nutritional supplement; as contents of capsules dispersed in a nutritional supplement, delivered via nasogastric tube; or as a divided dose of 200 mg orally twice daily as intact capsules with a nutritional supplement. Fifty-eight participants received treatment. Total exposure to fedratinib was similar after oral administration of intact capsules or when dispersed in a nutritional supplement (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration geometric mean ratio [AUC0-t GMR] [90% CI], 1.007 [0.929-1.092]). Total exposure to fedratinib was slightly reduced following nasogastric administration (AUC0-t GMR 0.850 [0.802-0.901]) and as a divided dose (AUC0-t GMR 0.836 [0.789-0.886]). No new safety signals were identified for fedratinib, and most participants found the taste and palatability acceptable when dispersed in a nutritional supplement. Overall, results suggest no clinically meaningful differences in total exposure to fedratinib between the tested oral administration methods. These findings may facilitate administration of fedratinib to patients who are intolerant of swallowing the capsule dosage form. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05051553).

Effect of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of fedratinib in healthy adults

Purpose

Fedratinib is an orally administered Janus kinase (JAK) 2–selective inhibitor for the treatment of adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk primary or secondary myelofibrosis. In vitro, fedratinib is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C19. Coadministration of fedratinib with CYP3A4 inhibitors is predicted to increase systemic exposure to fedratinib. This study evaluated the effect of multiple doses of the dual CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inhibitor, fluconazole, on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of fedratinib.

Methods

In this non-randomized, fixed-sequence, open-label study, healthy adult participants first received a single oral dose of fedratinib 100 mg on day 1. Participants then received fluconazole 400 mg on day 10 and fluconazole 200 mg once daily on days 11–23, with a single oral dose of fedratinib 100 mg on day 18. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for fedratinib administered with and without fluconazole.

Results

A total of 16 participants completed the study and were included in the pharmacokinetic population. Coadministration of fedratinib with fluconazole increased maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0–t) of fedratinib by 21% and 56%, respectively, compared with fedratinib alone. Single oral doses of fedratinib 100 mg administered with or without fluconazole were well tolerated.

Conclusions

Systemic exposure after a single oral dose of fedratinib was increased by up to 56% when fedratinib was coadministered with fluconazole compared with fedratinib alone.

Trial registry: Clinicaltrials.gov

NCT04702464.

Fedratinib, the first selective JAK2 inhibitor approved for treatment of myelofibrosis - an option beyond ruxolitinib

Introduction: Myelofibrosis, a life shortening clonal disorder, presents with a constellation of features: bone marrow fibrosis, abnormal blood counts, extramedullary hematopoiesis, splenomegaly, thrombohemorrhagic complications and constitutional symptoms. Until recently Ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and 2 inhibitor, has been the only targeted therapy available for transplant-ineligible patients requiring treatment for splenomegaly and disease related symptoms. However, most patients discontinue Ruxolitinib after 3-5 years, mostly due to loss of response. There has been an unmet need for this patient group. In August 2019 Fedratinib (INREBIC® capsules, Impact Biomedicines, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Meyer Squibb), a JAK2 inhibitor, was approved by US FDA for treatment of myelofibrosis in both JAK inhibitor naïve and pre-treated patients for the management of symptoms and splenomegaly.Areas covered: Here, we discuss the development, evidence base to date for Fedratinib. Including early and late phase, and ongoing trials, safety issues, potential role and current position of Fedratinib in the treatment of myelofibrosis, as well as future direction of targeted therapy in myelofibrosis.Expert opinion: Fedratinib presents a much needed option of treatment, particularly, for patients failing Ruxolitinib, with response rates that are quite similar. Nonetheless, there remain important questions including sequencing and options for combining therapy.

Impact of fedratinib on the pharmacokinetics of transporter probe substrates using a cocktail approach

INTRODUCTION

Fedratinib, an oral, selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor, has been shown to inhibit P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, OATP1B3, organic cation transporter (OCT) 2, and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 1 and MATE2-K in vitro. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of fedratinib on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of digoxin (P-gp substrate), rosuvastatin (OATP1B1/1B3 and BCRP substrate), and metformin (OCT2 and MATE1/2-K substrate).

METHODS

In this nonrandomized, fixed-sequence, open-label study, 24 healthy adult participants received single oral doses of digoxin 0.25 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg, and metformin 1000 mg administered as a drug cocktail (day 1, period 1). After a 6-day washout, participants received oral fedratinib 600 mg 1 h before the cocktail on day 7 (period 2). An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed to determine possible influences of fedratinib on the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin.

RESULTS

Plasma exposure to the three probe drugs was generally comparable in the presence or absence of fedratinib. Reduced metformin renal clearance by 36% and slightly higher plasma glucose levels after OGTT were observed in the presence of fedratinib. Single oral doses of the cocktail ± fedratinib were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that fedratinib has minimal impact on the exposure of P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1/1B3, OCT2, and MATE1/2-K substrates. Since renal clearance of metformin was decreased in the presence of fedratinib, caution should be exercised in using coadministered drugs that are renally excreted via OCT2 and MATEs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04231435 on January 18, 2020.

Effects of strong and moderate CYP3A4 inducers on the pharmacokinetics of fedratinib in healthy adult participants

PURPOSE

Fedratinib is an oral and selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor that is indicated for treatment of adults with intermediate-2 or high-risk primary or secondary myelofibrosis. Fedratinib is metabolized by cytochrome P450s (CYPs), primarily CYP3A4. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of the strong CYP3A4 inducer rifampin and moderate CYP3A4 inducer efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of fedratinib.

METHODS

This Phase 1, open-label, two-part study (Part 1 for rifampin and Part 2 for efavirenz) was conducted in healthy adult men and women. A single dose of fedratinib (500 mg) was administered on Day 1. Participants received rifampin 600 mg daily or efavirenz 600 mg daily on Days 9-18. On Day 17, a single dose of fedratinib (500 mg) was coadministered with rifampin or efavirenz. Plasma fedratinib concentrations were measured using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Maximum observed plasma fedratinib concentrations were lowered by approximately 70% and 30% during coadministration with rifampin or efavirenz, respectively, compared with fedratinib alone. Geometric means of fedratinib area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity were decreased by 81% (90% confidence interval [CI], 77-83%) and 47% (90% CI, 40-53%) during coadministration with rifampin or efavirenz, respectively. Fedratinib was generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination with rifampin or efavirenz.

CONCLUSION

Significant reductions in fedratinib exposure were observed in the presence of strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers. These results suggest that agents that are strong or moderate inducers of CYP3A4 should be avoided when coadministered with fedratinib.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03983239 (Registration date: June 12, 2019).

Evaluation of the Potential for QTc Prolongation With Repeated Oral Doses of Fedratinib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

The impact of repeated daily 500-mg fedratinib (an oral selective Janus kinase [JAK] 2 inhibitor) on QTc and other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters was assessed in 60 patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received placebo on day 1 and fedratinib 500 mg daily for 14 days. Concentration-QTc analysis was performed with change-from-baseline QTc corrected by Fridericia's formula (ΔQTcF) as the dependent variable. Fedratinib median time to maximum plasma concentration (C_max ) was observed 3 hours postdose on day 15. The largest difference between means for fedratinib and placebo was 0.5 bpm (90%CI, -2.75 to 3.72 bpm) for heart rate (3 hours postdose) and 4.3 milliseconds (90%CI, 1.04-7.60 milliseconds) for QTcF (4 hours postdose). The estimated slope of the fedratinib concentration-QTcF relationship was shallow and not statistically significant: -0.0005 milliseconds per ng/mL (90%CI, -0.00145 to 0.00050 milliseconds per ng/mL). Predicted fedratinib placebo-corrected ΔQTcF was 0.6 milliseconds (90%CI, -1.80 to 2.93 milliseconds) at the geometric mean of the observed C_max (3615 ng/mL). Fedratinib did not affect PR or QRS intervals. No patients had QTcF > 60 milliseconds, and no patients experienced QTcF ≥ 500 milliseconds. Fedratinib did not cause clinically relevant ECG effects or QTc prolongation. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile.