A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of bi-daily dosing of oral paclitaxel in combination with cyclosporin A

A phase Ib study of Oraxol (oral paclitaxel and encequidar) in patients with advanced malignancies

PURPOSE

Oraxol is an oral formulation of paclitaxel administered with a novel, minimally absorbed P-glycoprotein inhibitor encequidar (HM30181A). This phase Ib study was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of Oraxol administered at a fixed dose for up to 5 consecutive days in patients with advanced malignancies.

METHODS

Part 1 of this study utilized a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design to determine the MTD of oral paclitaxel 270 mg plus oral encequidar 15 mg administered daily. Dose escalation was achieved by increasing the number of consecutive dosing days per week (from 2 to 5 days per week). Dosing occurred for 3 consecutive weeks out of a 4-week cycle. Part 2 treated additional patients at the MTD to determine tolerability and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Adverse events, tumor responses, and pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients (n = 24 in Part 1, n = 10 in Part 2) received treatment. The MTD of Oraxol was determined to be 270 mg daily × 5 days per week per protocol definition and this was declared the RP2D. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, neutropenia, and nausea/vomiting. Hypersensitivity-type reactions were not observed. Of the 28 patients evaluable for response, 2 (7.1%) achieved partial response and 18 (64.3%) achieved stable disease. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed rapid absorption of paclitaxel when administered orally following encequidar. Paclitaxel daily exposure was comparable following 2-5 days dose levels.

CONCLUSION

The oral administration of encequidar with paclitaxel was safe, achieved clinically relevant paclitaxel levels, and showed evidence of anti-tumor activity.

Therapeutic strategies to overcome taxane resistance in cancer

One of the primary causes of attenuated or loss of efficacy of cancer chemotherapy is the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR). Numerous studies have been published regarding potential approaches to reverse resistance to taxanes, including paclitaxel (PTX) and docetaxel, which represent one of the most important classes of anticancer drugs. Since 1984, following the FDA approval of paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma, taxanes have been extensively used as drugs that target tumor microtubules. Taxanes, have been shown to affect an array of oncogenic signaling pathways and have potent cytotoxic efficacy. However, the clinical success of these drugs has been restricted by the emergence of cancer cell resistance, primarily caused by the overexpression of MDR efflux transporters or by microtubule alterations. In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that the mechanisms underlying the resistance to PTX and docetaxel are primarily due to alterations in α-tubulin and β-tubulin. Moreover, resistance to PTX and docetaxel results from: 1) alterations in microtubule-protein interactions, including microtubule-associated protein 4, stathmin, centriole, cilia, spindle-associated protein, and kinesins; 2) alterations in the expression and activity of multidrug efflux transporters of the ABC superfamily including P-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1); 3) overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins or inhibition of apoptotic proteins and tumor-suppressor proteins, as well as 4) modulation of signal transduction pathways associated with the activity of several cytokines, chemokines and transcription factors. In this review, we discuss the abovementioned molecular mechanisms and their role in mediating cancer chemoresistance to PTX and docetaxel. We provide a detailed analysis of both in vitro and in vivo experimental data and describe the application of these findings to therapeutic practice. The current review also discusses the efficacy of different pharmacological modulations to achieve reversal of PTX resistance. The therapeutic roles of several novel compounds, as well as herbal formulations, are also discussed. Among them, many structural derivatives had efficacy against the MDR phenotype by either suppressing MDR or increasing the cytotoxic efficacy compared to the parental drugs, or both. Natural products functioning as MDR chemosensitizers offer novel treatment strategies in patients with chemoresistant cancers by attenuating MDR and increasing chemotherapy efficacy. We broadly discuss the roles of inhibitors of P-gp and other efflux pumps, in the reversal of PTX and docetaxel resistance in cancer cells and the significance of using a nanomedicine delivery system in this context. Thus, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms mediating the reversal of drug resistance, combined with drug efficacy and the application of target-based inhibition or specific drug delivery, could signal a new era in modern medicine that would limit the pathological consequences of MDR in cancer patients.

The intravenous to oral switch of taxanes: strategies and current clinical developments

The taxanes paclitaxel, docetaxel and cabazitaxel are important anticancer agents that are widely used as intravenous treatment for several solid tumor types. Switching from intravenous to oral treatment can be more convenient for patients, improve cost-effectiveness and reduce the demands of chemotherapy treatment on hospital care. However, oral treatment with taxanes is challenging because of pharmaceutical and pharmacological factors that lead to low oral bioavailability. This review summarizes the current clinical developments in oral taxane treatment. Intravenous parent drugs, strategies in the oral switch, individual agents in clinical trials, challenges and further perspectives on treatment with oral taxanes are subsequently discussed.

A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of Low-Dose Metronomic Treatment With Novel Oral Paclitaxel Formulations in Combination With Ritonavir in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

ModraPac001 (MP1) and ModraPac005 (MP5) are novel oral paclitaxel formulations that are coadministered with the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir (r), enabling daily low-dose metronomic (LDM) treatment. The primary aim of this study was to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MP1/r and MP5/r. The second aim was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) as LDM treatment. This was an open-label phase 1 trial. Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled according to a classical 3+3 design. After initial employment of the MP1 capsule, the MP5 tablet was introduced. Safety was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.02. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1, 2, 8, and 22 for determination of paclitaxel and ritonavir plasma concentrations. In this study, 37 patients were treated with up to twice-daily 30-mg paclitaxel combined with twice-daily 100-mg ritonavir (MP5/r 30-30/100-100) in 9 dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were nausea, (febrile) neutropenia, dehydration and vomiting. At the MTD/RP2D of MP5/r 20-20/100-100, the maximum paclitaxel plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve until 24 hours were 34.6 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 79%) and 255 ng • h/mL (coefficient of variation, 62%), respectively. Stable disease was observed as best response in 15 of 31 evaluable patients. Based on these results, LDM therapy with oral paclitaxel coadministrated with ritonavir was considered feasible and safe. The MTD and RP2D were determined as MP5/r 20-20/100-100. Further clinical development of MP5/r as an LDM concept, including potential combination treatment, is warranted.

Efficacy and safety findings from DREAM: a phase III study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) versus i.v. paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy

Background

Paclitaxel is currently only available as an intravenous (i.v.) formulation. DHP107 is a novel oral formulation of lipid ingredients and paclitaxel. DHP107 demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics to i.v. paclitaxel as a second-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). DREAM is a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized phase III study of patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed, unresectable/recurrent AGC after first-line therapy failure.

Methods and materials

Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to DHP107 (200 mg/m2 orally twice daily days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks) or i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 day 1 every 3 weeks). Patients were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, disease status, and prior treatment; response was assessed (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) every 6 weeks. Primary end point: non-inferiority of progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points: overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. For the efficacy analysis, sequential tests for non-inferiority were carried out, first with a non-inferiority margin of 1.48, then with a margin of 1.25.

Results

Baseline characteristics were balanced in the 236 randomized patients (n = 118 per arm). Median PFS (per-protocol) was 3.0 (95% CI 1.7-4.0) months for DHP107 and 2.6 (95% CI 1.8-2.8) months for paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85; 95% CI 0.64-1.13). A sensitivity analysis on PFS using independent central review showed similar results (HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.70-1.24). Median OS (full analysis set) was 9.7 (95% CI 7.1 - 11.5) months for DHP107 versus 8.9 (95% CI 7.1-12.2) months for paclitaxel (HR = 1.04; 95% CI 0.76-1.41). ORR was 17.8% for DHP107 (CR 4.2%; PR 13.6%) versus 25.4% for paclitaxel (CR 3.4%; PR 22.0%). Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and mucositis were more common with DHP107; peripheral neuropathy was more common with paclitaxel. There were only few Grade≥3 adverse events, most commonly neutropenia (42% versus 53%); febrile neutropenia was reported infrequently (5.9% versus 2.5%). No hypersensitivity reactions occurred with DHP107 (paclitaxel 2.5%).

Conclusions

DHP107 as a second-line treatment of AGC was non-inferior to paclitaxel for PFS; other efficacy and safety parameters were comparable. DHP107 is the first oral paclitaxel with proven efficacy/safety for the treatment of AGC.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT01839773.

Different structures of berberine and five other protoberberine alkaloids that affect P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux capacity

Berberine, berberrubine, thalifendine, demethyleneberberine, jatrorrhizine, and columbamine are six natural protoberberine alkaloid (PA) compounds that display extensive pharmacological properties and share the same protoberberine molecular skeleton with only slight substitution differences. The oral delivery of most PAs is hindered by their poor bioavailability, which is largely caused by P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated drug efflux. Meanwhile, P-gp undergoes large-scale conformational changes (from an inward-facing to an outward-facing state) when transporting substrates, and these changes might strongly affect the P-gp-binding specificity. To confirm whether these six compounds are substrates of P-gp, to investigate the differences in efflux capacity caused by their trivial structural differences and to reveal the key to increasing their binding affinity to P-gp, we conducted a series of in vivo, in vitro, and in silico assays. Here, we first confirmed that all six compounds were substrates of P-gp by comparing the drug concentrations in wild-type and P-gp-knockout mice in vivo. The efflux capacity (net efflux) ranked as berberrubine > berberine > columbamine ~ jatrorrhizine > thalifendine > demethyleneberberine based on in vitro transport studies in Caco-2 monolayers. Using molecular dynamics simulation and molecular docking techniques, we determined the transport pathways of the six compounds and their binding affinities to P-gp. The results suggested that at the early binding stage, different hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions collectively differentiate the binding affinities of the compounds to P-gp, whereas electrostatic interactions are the main determinant at the late release stage. In addition to hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonds play an important role in discriminating the binding affinities.

A Phase I/IIa Study of DHP107, a Novel Oral Paclitaxel Formulation, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors or Gastric Cancer

Lessons Learned.

Ideally, patients should have access to an oral formulation of paclitaxel, as well as an intravenous formulation, to allow development of regimens exploring alternate schedules and to avoid reactions to Cremophor EL (BASF Corp., Ludwigshafen, Germany, https://www.basf.com).

DHP107 is a novel oral paclitaxel formulation that is a tolerable and feasible regimen for patients with gastric cancer, with data suggesting efficacy similar to that of intravenous paclitaxel.

Background.

We evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of DHP107, a novel oral paclitaxel formulation, and the efficacy and safety of the agent in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Patients and Methods.

Phase I study: cohorts of 3–6 patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating DHP107 doses. Phase IIa study: patients with measurable advanced gastric cancer received DHP107, 200 mg/m² b.i.d., on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy were analyzed.

Results.

Phase I: 17 patients received a dose‐escalating regimen of DHP107, 150–250 mg/m² b.i.d. Dose‐limiting toxicities were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The MTD (recommended dose) for phase IIa was 200 mg/m² b.i.d. Phase IIa: 11 patients with measurable advanced gastric cancer in whom first‐line therapy failed received DHP107 (MTD). Three confirmed partial responses were observed. Median progression‐free survival of gastric cancer patients (n = 16) treated at the MTD was 2.97 (95% confidence interval, 1.67–5.40) months (Fig. 1). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (35.3%) and leukopenia (17.6%) at the MTD (phase I and IIa combined; n = 17).

Conclusion.

DHP107 showed good antitumor efficacy and was tolerable. The MTD (200 mg/m² b.i.d.) is recommended for use in further studies comparing DHP107 with standard intravenous paclitaxel therapy.

Absorption mechanism of DHP107, an oral paclitaxel formulation that forms a hydrated lipidic sponge phase

Paclitaxel is a most widely used anticancer drug with low oral bioavailability, thus it is currently administered via intravenous infusion. DHP107 is a lipid-based paclitaxel formulation that can be administered as an oral solution. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of paclitaxel absorption after oral administration of DHP107 in mice and rats by changing the dosing interval, and evaluated the influence of bile excretion. DHP107 was orally administered to mice at various dosing intervals (2, 4, 8, 12, 24 h) to examine how residual DHP107 affected paclitaxel absorption during subsequent administration. Studies with small-angle X-ray diffraction (SAXS) and cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) showed that DHP107 formed a lipidic sponge phase after hydration. The AUC values after the second dose were smaller than those after the first dose, which was correlated to the induction of expression of P-gp and CYP in the livers and small intestines from 2 h to 7 d after the first dose. The smaller AUC value observed after the second dose was also attributed to the intestinal adhesion of residual formulation. The adhered DHP107 may have been removed by ingested food, thus resulting in a higher AUC. In ex vivo and in vivo mucoadhesion studies, the formulation adhered to the villi for up to 24 h, and the amount of DHP107 that adhered was approximately half that of monoolein. The paclitaxel absorption after administration of DHP107 was not affected by bile in the cholecystectomy mice. The dosing interval and food intake affect the oral absorption of paclitaxel from DHP107, which forms a mucoadhesive sponge phase after hydration. Bile excretion does not affect the absorption of paclitaxel from DHP107 in vivo.

A Phase I Study of Oral Paclitaxel with a Novel P-Glycoprotein Inhibitor, HM30181A, in Patients with Advanced Solid Cancer

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase II dose of an oral drug composed of paclitaxel and HM30181A, which is an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, in patients with advanced cancers.

Materials and Methods

Patients with advanced solid tumors received standard therapy were given the study drug at escalating doses, using a 3+3 design. The study drug was orally administered on days 1, 8, and 15, with a 28-day cycle of administration. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated from 60 to 420 mg/m², and the dose of HM30181A was escalated from 30-210 mg/m².

Results

A total of twenty-four patients were enrolled. Only one patient experienced a doselimiting toxicity—a grade 3 neutropenia that persisted for more than 2 weeks, at 240 mg/m² of paclitaxel. MTD was not reached. The maximum plasma concentration was obtained at a dose level of 300 mg/m² and the area under the curve of plasma concentration- time from 0 to the most recent plasma concentration measurement of paclitaxel was reached at a dose level of 420 mg/m². The absorption of paclitaxel tends to be limited at doses that exceed 300 mg/m². The effective plasma concentration of paclitaxel was achieved at a dose of 120 mg/m². Responses of 23 patients were evaluated; 8 (34.8%) had stable disease and 15 (65.2%) had progressive disease.

Conclusion

The study drug appears to be well tolerated, and the effective plasma concentration of paclitaxel was achieved. The recommended phase II dose for oral paclitaxel is 300 mg/m².

Orally bioavailable tubulin antagonists for paclitaxel-refractory cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and oral activity of two promising indoles, (2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-1H-imidazol-4-yl)(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)methanone [compound II] and (2-(1H-indol-5-ylamino)-thiazol-4-yl)(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)methanone [compound IAT], in paclitaxel- and docetaxel-resistant tumor models in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

The in vitro drug-like properties, including potency, solubility, metabolic stability, and drug-drug interactions were examined for our two active compounds. An in vivo pharmacokinetic study and antitumor efficacy study were also completed to compare their efficacy with docetaxel.

RESULTS

Both compounds bound to the colchicine-binding site on tubulin, and inhibited tubulin polymerization, resulting in highly potent cytotoxic activity in vitro. While the potency of paclitaxel and docetaxel was compromised in a multidrug-resistant cell line that overexpresses P-glycoprotein, the potency of compounds II and IAT was maintained. Both compounds had favorable drug-like properties, and acceptable oral bioavailability (21-50 %) in mice, rats, and dogs. Tumor growth inhibition of greater than 100 % was achieved when immunodeficient mice with rapidly growing paclitaxel-resistant prostate cancer cells were treated orally at doses of 3-30 mg/kg of II or IAT.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies highlight the potent and broad anticancer activity of two orally bioavailable compounds, offering significant pharmacologic advantage over existing drugs of this class for multidrug resistant or taxane-refractory cancers.

Novel paclitaxel formulations for oral application: a phase I pharmacokinetic study in patients with solid tumours

PURPOSE

To explore the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of paclitaxel and two major metabolites after three single oral administrations of a novel drinking solution and two capsule formulations in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with advanced cancer. Moreover, the tolerability and safety of the formulations was studied. In addition, single nucleotide polymorphisms in the multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene were determined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients were enrolled and randomized to receive CsA 10 mg/kg followed by oral paclitaxel 180 mg given as (1) drinking solution (formulation 1), (2) capsule formulation 2B, and (3) capsule formulation 2C on day 1, 8, or 15.

RESULTS

The median C (max) of paclitaxel was 0.42 (0.23-0.96), 0.48 (0.08-0.59), and 0.39 (0.11-1.03) microg/ml and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 2.83 (1.69-5.12), 2.01 (1.57-3.04), and 2.67 (1.05-3.61) mug h/ml following administration of formulations 1, 2B, and 2C, respectively. The novel formulations were tolerated after single oral dose without causing relevant gastrointestinal or haematological toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK and metabolism of paclitaxel were comparable between the oral formulations co-administered with CsA.

Phase II and pharmacological study of oral paclitaxel (Paxoral) plus ciclosporin in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Paclitaxel is an important chemotherapeutic agent for breast cancer. Paclitaxel has high affinity for the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) (drug efflux pump) in the gastrointestinal tract causing low and variable oral bioavailability. Previously, we demonstrated that oral paclitaxel plus the P-gp inhibitor ciclosporin (CsA) is safe and results in adequate exposure to paclitaxel. This study evaluates the activity, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel combined with CsA in breast cancer patients. Patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer were given oral paclitaxel 90 mg m⁻² combined with CsA 10 mg kg⁻¹ (30 min prior to each paclitaxel administration) twice on one day, each week. Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 50 years were entered. All patients had received prior treatments, 25 had received prior anthracycline-containing chemotherapy and 19 had three or more metastatic sites. Total number of weekly administrations was 442 (median: 15/patient) and dose intensity of 97 mg m⁻² week⁻¹. Most patients needed treatment delay and 17 patients needed dose reductions. In intention to treat analysis, the overall response rate was 52%, the median time to progression was 6.5 months and overall survival was 16 months. The pharmacokinetics revealed moderate inter- and low intrapatient variability. Weekly oral paclitaxel, combined with CsA, is active in patients with advanced breast cancer.

A novel self-microemulsifying formulation of paclitaxel for oral administration to patients with advanced cancer

To explore the parmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of paclitaxel after oral administration of SMEOF#3, a novel Self-Microemulsifying Oily Formulation, in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with advanced cancer. Seven patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive oral paclitaxel (SMEOF#3) 160 mg+CsA 700 mg on day 1, followed by oral paclitaxel (Taxol®) 160 mg+CsA 700 mg on day 8 (group I) or vice versa (group II). Patients received paclitaxel (Taxol®) 160 mg as 3-h infusion on day 15. The median (range) area under the plasma concentration–time curve of paclitaxel was 2.06 (1.15–3.47) μg h ml⁻¹ and 1.97 (0.58–3.22) μg h ml⁻¹ after oral administration of SMEOF#3 and Taxol®, respectively, and 4.69 (3.90–6.09) μg h ml⁻¹ after intravenous Taxol®. Oral SMEOF#3 resulted in a lower median T_max of 2.0 (0.5–2.0) h than orally applied Taxol® (T_max=4.0 (0.8–6.1) h, P=0.02). The median apparent bioavailability of paclitaxel was 40 (19–83)% and 55 (9–70)% for the oral SMEOF#3 and oral Taxol® formulation, respectively. Oral paclitaxel administered as SMEOF#3 or Taxol® was safe and well tolerated by the patients. Remarkably, the SMEOF#3 formulation resulted in a significantly lower T_max than orally applied Taxol®, probably due to the excipients in the SMEOF#3 formulation resulting in a higher absorption rate of paclitaxel.

Enhanced Oral Paclitaxel Bioavailability After Administration of Paclitaxel-Loaded Lipid Nanocapsules

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel-loaded lipid nanocapsules (LNC) in rats to assess the intrinsic effect of the dosage form on the improvement of paclitaxel oral exposure.

METHODS

Paclitaxel-loaded LNC were prepared and characterized in terms of size distribution, drug payload, and the kinetics of paclitaxel crystallization. Taxol, Taxol with verapamil, or paclitaxel-loaded LNC were administered orally to rats. The plasma concentration of paclitaxel was determined using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The average size of LNC was 60.9 +/- 1.5 nm. The drug payload of paclitaxel was 1.91 +/- 0.01 mg/g of aqueous dispersion. The encapsulation efficiency was 99.9 +/- 1.0%, and 1.7 +/- 0.1% of paclitaxel was crystallized after 24 h. The oral bioavailability of Taxol alone was 6.5%. After oral administration of paclitaxel-loaded LNC or paclitaxel associated with verapamil, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was significantly increased (about 3-fold) in comparison to the control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that LNC provided a promising new formulation to enhance the oral bioavailability of paclitaxel while avoiding the use of pharmacologically active P-gp inhibitors, such as verapamil.

A pharmacokinetic and safety study of a novel polymeric paclitaxel formulation for oral application

PURPOSE

To investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a new oral formulation of paclitaxel containing the polymer polyvinyl acetate phthalate in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of six patients received oral paclitaxel as single agent given as a single dose of 100 mg on day 1, oral paclitaxel 100 mg in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA) 10 mg/kg both given as a single dose on day 8, and i.v. paclitaxel (Taxol) 100 mg as a 3-h infusion on day 15.

RESULTS

The AUC (mean +/- standard deviation) values of paclitaxel after oral administration without CsA and with CsA were 476 +/- 254 and 967 +/- 779 ng/ml h, respectively. T (max) was 4.0 +/- 0.9 h after oral paclitaxel without CsA, and 6.0 +/- 3.1 h after oral paclitaxel with CsA. The mean AUC after oral administration as single agent was 13% of the AUC after i.v. administration of paclitaxel, and increased to 26% after co-administration with CsA. No haematological toxicities were observed, and only mild (CTC-grade 1 and 2) non-hematological toxicities occurred after oral intake of paclitaxel with or without CsA.

CONCLUSION

The AUC of the new polymeric paclitaxel formulation increased a factor 2 in combination with CsA, which confirms that CsA co-administration can also improve exposure to paclitaxel after oral administration of a polymeric formulation. Because of the delayed release of paclitaxel from this formulation, we hypothesize that a split-dose regimen of CsA where it is administered before and after paclitaxel administration will further increase the systemic exposure to paclitaxel up to therapeutic levels. The formulation was well tolerated at the dose of 100 mg without induction of severe toxicities.

Phase I Trial with BMS-275183, a Novel Oral Taxane with Promising Antitumor Activity

PURPOSE

BMS-275183 is an orally administered C-4 methyl carbonate analogue of paclitaxel. We did a dose-escalating phase I study to investigate its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and possible antitumor activity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A cycle consisted of four weekly doses of BMS-275183. The starting dose was 5 mg, which was increased by 100% increments (i.e., 5, 10, 20 mg/m2, etc.) in each new cohort consisting of one patient. Cohorts were expanded when toxicity was encountered, and 20 patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Plasma pharmacokinetics were done on days 1 and 15.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were enrolled in this trial. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, and neutropenia. First cycle severe neuropathy was reported in four patients treated at 320 (n = 1), 240 (n = 2), and 160 mg/m2 (n = 1), whereas eight patients treated at dose levels ranging from 160 to 320 mg/m2 experienced grade 2 neuropathy in cycle one. The MTD was 200 mg/m2, as 3 of 20 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity in cycle one [fatigue (n = 2), and neutropenia/diarrhea (n = 1)]. BMS-275183 was rapidly absorbed with a mean plasma half-life of 22 hours. We observed a significant correlation between drug-exposure and toxicity. Tumor responses were observed in 9 of 38 evaluable patients with non-small cell lung cancer, prostate carcinoma, and other tumor types.

CONCLUSIONS

BMS-275183 is generally well tolerated on a weekly schedule. The main toxicity is peripheral neuropathy, and the MTD is 200 mg/m2. Promising activity was observed in several tumor types, and a phase II trial in non-small cell lung cancer has been initiated.

Polyethylene glycol-phosphatidylethanolamine conjugate (PEG-PE)-based mixed micelles: some properties, loading with paclitaxel, and modulation of P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux

Mixed micelles prepared of poly(ethylene glycol)2000-phosphatidyl ethanolamine conjugate (PEG(2000)-PE) and d-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) in 1:1 molar ratio have been investigated. Micelle formation was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy. CMC of the micelles was found to be 1.5 x 10(-5)M. Poorly soluble anti-cancer drug paclitaxel (PCL) was efficiently solubilized in 15 nm non-toxic PEG-PE/TPGS micelles. PCL entrapment was quite stable with only about 20% of the incorporated drug released from micelles after 48 h at 37 degrees C. In addition, PCL-containing PEG(2000)-PE/TPGS micelles were stable in vitro under various conditions modeling the physiological ones, in particular, at low pH values and in the presence of bile acids, which is especially important for their possible oral administration. Fluorescently labeled micelles demonstrated time-dependent internalization by human colon adenocarcinoma cell line, Caco-2. The internalization of PEG(2000)-PE/TPGS micelles loaded with P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate, rhodamine-123 (RH-123), opposite to the internalization of the free RH-123, was not influenced by the inhibition of the P-gp pump with verapamil hydrochloride, which assumes a P-gp-independent micelle internalization.

Development of supersaturatable self-emulsifying drug delivery system formulations for improving the oral absorption of poorly soluble drugs

The supersaturatable self-emulsifying drug delivery system (S-SEDDS) represents a new thermodynamically stable formulation approach wherein it is designed to contain a reduced amount of a surfactant and a water-soluble cellulosic polymer (or other polymers) to prevent precipitation of the drug by generating and maintaining a supersaturated state in vivo. The S-SEDDS formulations can result in enhanced oral absorption as compared with the related self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) formulation and the reduced surfactant levels may minimise gastrointestinal surfactant side effects.

Population pharmacokinetics of orally administered paclitaxel formulated in Cremophor EL

AIM

The vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) has been shown to impair the absorption of paclitaxel by micellar entrapment of the drug in the gastrointestinal tract. The goal of this study was to develop a semimechanistic population pharmacokinetic model to study the influence of CrEL on the oral absorption of paclitaxel.

METHOD

Paclitaxel plasma-concentration time profiles were available from 55 patients (M:F, 17 : 38; total 67 courses; 797 samples), receiving paclitaxel orally once or twice daily (dose range 60-360 mg m(-2)) together with 12-15 mg kg(-1) cyclosporin A. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using the nonlinear mixed effect modelling program NONMEM.

RESULTS

After absorption, paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were best described using a two-compartment model with linear distribution from the central compartment into a peripheral compartment and first-order elimination. Paclitaxel in the gastrointestinal tract was modelled as free fraction or bound to CrEL, with only the free fraction available for absorption into the central compartment. The equilibrium between free and bound paclitaxel was influenced by the concentration of CrEL present in the gastrointestinal tract. The concentration of CrEL in the gastrointestinal tract decreased with time with a first order rate constant of 1.73 h(-1). The bioavailability of paclitaxel was independent of the dose and of CrEL. Estimated apparent paclitaxel clearance and volume of distribution were 127 l h(-1) and 409 l, respectively. Large interpatient variability was observed. Covariate analysis did not reveal significant relationships with any of the pharmacokinetic parameters.

CONCLUSION

A pharmacokinetic model was developed that described the pharmacokinetics of orally administered paclitaxel. CrEL strongly influenced paclitaxel absorption from the gastrointestinal tract resulting in time-dependent but no significant dose-dependent absorption over the examined dose range studied.

ENHANCED ORAL BIOAVAILABILITY OF PACLITAXEL BY RECOMBINANT INTERLEUKIN-2 IN MICE WITH MURINE LEWIS LUNG CARCINOMA

The effect of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel was investigated in the murine Lewis lung carcinoma model in C57B1/6 mice. Paclitaxel 15 mg/kg was administrated orally to mice, either alone or after 3 days pretreatment with twice daily dose of 16.5 microg rIL-2. Plasma concentrations of paclitaxel were estimated by reversed phase HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using MicroPharm software. Using Bailer's method, a significant difference was observed in the AUCs of paclitaxel administrated alone and with rIL-2 pretreatment (928.2 +/- 136.8 vs 2549.6 +/- 131.3 ng.h.ml(-1), p <0.0001). Pretreatment with rIL-2 resulted in a 3-fold increase in the oral bioavailability of paclitaxel without altering its elimination half-life (0.798 vs 0.747 h). This could be due to the inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) mediated transport, thus enhancing paclitaxel intestinal absorption. The combination of these two drugs could be of interest in clinical practice due to their activity in pulmonary cancer.

Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles : implications for cancer chemotherapy

The non-ionic surfactants Cremophor EL (CrEL; polyoxyethyleneglycerol triricinoleate 35) and polysorbate 80 (Tween) 80; polyoxyethylene-sorbitan-20-monooleate) are widely used as drug formulation vehicles, including for the taxane anticancer agents paclitaxel and docetaxel. A wealth of recent experimental data has indicated that both solubilisers are biologically and pharmacologically active compounds, and their use as drug formulation vehicles has been implicated in clinically important adverse effects, including acute hypersensitivity reactions and peripheral neuropathy.CrEL and Tween 80 have also been demonstrated to influence the disposition of solubilised drugs that are administered intravenously. The overall resulting effect is a highly increased systemic drug exposure and a simultaneously decreased clearance, leading to alteration in the pharmacodynamic characteristics of the solubilised drug. Kinetic experiments revealed that this effect is primarily caused by reduced cellular uptake of the drug from large spherical micellar-like structures with a highly hydrophobic interior, which act as the principal carrier of circulating drug. Within the central blood compartment, this results in a profound alteration of drug accumulation in erythrocytes, thereby reducing the free drug fraction available for cellular partitioning and influencing drug distribution as well as elimination routes. The existence of CrEL and Tween 80 in blood as large polar micelles has also raised additional complexities in the case of combination chemotherapy regimens with taxanes, such that the disposition of several coadministered drugs, including anthracyclines and epipodophyllotoxins, is significantly altered. In contrast to the enhancing effects of Tween 80, addition of CrEL to the formulation of oral drug preparations seems to result in significantly diminished drug uptake and reduced circulating concentrations. The drawbacks presented by the presence of CrEL or Tween 80 in drug formulations have instigated extensive research to develop alternative delivery forms. Currently, several strategies are in progress to develop Tween 80- and CrEL-free formulations of docetaxel and paclitaxel, which are based on pharmaceutical (e.g. albumin nanoparticles, emulsions and liposomes), chemical (e.g. polyglutamates, analogues and prodrugs), or biological (e.g. oral drug administration) strategies. These continued investigations should eventually lead to more rational and selective chemotherapeutic treatment.

Development of a supersaturable SEDDS (S‐SEDDS) formulation of paclitaxel with improved oral bioavailability

A new, supersaturable self-emulsifying drug delivery system (S-SEDDS) of paclitaxel was developed employing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) as a precipitation inhibitor with a conventional SEDDS formulation. In vitro dilution of the S-SEDDS formulation results in formation of a microemulsion, followed by slow crystallization of paclitaxel on standing. This result indicates that the system is supersaturated with respect to crystalline paclitaxel, and the supersaturated state is prolonged by HPMC in the formulation. In the absence of HPMC the SEDDS formulation undergoes rapid precipitation, yielding a low paclitaxel solution concentration. A pharmacokinetic study was conducted in male Sprague-Dawley rats to assess exposure after an oral paclitaxel dose of 10 mg/kg in the SEDDS formulations with (S-SEDDS) and without HPMC. The paclitaxel S-SEDDS formulation shows approximately 10-fold higher maximum concentration (C(max)) and five-fold higher oral bioavailability (F approximately 9.5%) compared with that of the orally dosed Taxol formulation (F approximately 2.0%) and the SEDDS formulation without HPMC (F approximately 1%). Coadministration of cyclosporin A (CsA), an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein and CYP 3A4 enzyme, at a dose of 5 mg/kg with the S-SEDDS formulation further increased the oral bioavailability (F approximately 22.6%). This assessment demonstrates that the systemic exposure of paclitaxel following oral administration can be substantially improved via the S-SEDDS approach.

Improvement of oral drug treatment by temporary inhibition of drug transporters and/or cytochrome P450 in the gastrointestinal tract and liver: an overview

The oral bioavailability of many cytotoxic drugs is low and/or highly variable. This can be caused by high affinity for drug transporters and activity of metabolic enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract and liver. In this review, we will describe the main involved drug transporters and metabolic enzymes and discuss novel methods to improve oral treatment of affected substrate drugs. Results of preclinical and clinical phase I and II studies will be discussed in which affected substrate drugs, such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, and topotecan, are given orally in combination with an inhibitor of drug transport or drug metabolism. Future randomized studies will, hopefully, confirm that this strategy for oral treatment is at least as equally effective and safe as standard intravenous administration of these drugs.

Weekly oral paclitaxel as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic study has shown that co-administration of cyclosporin A (CsA), which acts as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP-3A blocker, resulted in an 8-fold increase in the systemic exposure of oral paclitaxel. Two doses of oral paclitaxel on 1 day in combination with CsA resulted in higher systemic exposure than single dose administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase II study, chemonaïve patients with advanced gastric cancer received oral paclitaxel weekly in two doses of 90 mg/m(2) on the same day; CsA (10 mg/kg) was given 30 min before each dose of oral paclitaxel.

RESULTS

In 25 patients, the main toxicities were: nausea CTC grade 2/3, 10 patients (40%); vomiting grade 2/3, 4 patients (20%); diarrhea grade 2/3, 6 patients (24%); neutropenia grade 3/4, 5 patients (20%). In the 24 evaluable patients, eight partial responses were observed, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18% to 52%]. Eleven patients had stable disease (46%) and 5 patients showed progressive disease (21%). The ORR in the total population was 32% (95% CI 17% to 50%). The median time to progression was 16 weeks (95% CI 9-22). Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed that the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of orally administered paclitaxel (+/- standard deviation) was 3757.6 +/- 939.4 ng.h/ml in week 1 and 3928.4 +/- 1281 ng.h/ml in week 2. The intrapatient variability in the AUC was 12%.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral paclitaxel in combination with CsA is both active and safe in chemonaïve patients with advanced gastric cancer. Toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal.

Phase II and pharmacologic study of weekly oral paclitaxel plus cyclosporine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

A phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of oral cyclosporine (CsA) plus paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive or previously treated patients (one regimen) with measurable disease and World Health Organization performance status <or= 2 were eligible. Oral paclitaxel was given weekly in a dose of 90 mg/m(2) bid. CsA (10 mg/kg) was given 30 minutes before each dose of oral paclitaxel.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 32 to 77 years) were entered onto this study. Eighteen patients (69%) had received one prior chemotherapy regimen. The most frequently recorded toxicities were as follows: National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3 neutropenia, eight patients (31%); grade 4, six patients (23%); grade 4 febrile neutropenia, three patients (12%); grade 2/3 neurotoxicity, three patients (12%); and grade 2 nail changes, four patients (15%). The overall response rate (ORR) of the 23 assessable patients was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 48%). In the intention-to-treat population, the ORR was 23% (95% CI, 9% to 44%). The median time to progression was 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.2 to 3.9 months), and median overall survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 2.3 months to not available). Pharmacokinetics revealed that the mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of oral paclitaxel was 5.0 +/- 2.3 micro mol/L/h in week 1 and 4.6 +/- 2.0 micro mol/L/h in week 2, with interpatient variabilities (coefficient of variation [%CV]) of 45% and 42%, respectively. The intrapatient variability (%CV) of the AUC was 14.5%.

CONCLUSION

Oral paclitaxel plus CsA is active and safe in advanced NSCLC, including in patients previously treated with chemotherapy.

Oral delivery of taxanes

Oral treatment with cytotoxic agents is to be preferred as this administration route is convenient to patients, reduces administration costs and facilitates the use of more chronic treatment regimens. For the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel, however, low oral bioavailability has limited development of treatment by the oral route. Preclinical studies with mdr1a P-glycoprotein knock-out mice, which lack functional P-glycoprotein activity in the gut, have shown significant bioavailability of orally administered paclitaxel. Additional studies in wild-type mice revealed good bioavailability after oral administration when paclitaxel was combined with P-glycoprotein blockers such as cyclosporin A or the structurally related compound SDZ PSC 833. Based on the extensive preclinical research, the feasibility of oral administration of paclitaxel and docetaxel in cancer patients was recently demonstrated in our Institute. Co-administration of cyclosporin A strongly enhanced the oral bioavailability of both paclitaxel and docetaxel. For docetaxel in combination with cyclosporin A an oral bioavailability of 90% was achieved with an interpatient variability similar to that after intravenous drug administration; for paclitaxel the oral bioavailability is estimated at approximately 50%. The safety of the oral route for both taxanes is good. A phase II study of weekly oral docetaxel in combination with cyclosporin A is currently ongoing.