[CUP syndrome: molecular pathogenesis and biology]

Risk factors for cancers of unknown primary site: Results from the prospective EPIC cohort

Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) may be called an "orphan" disease, as it is diagnosed when metastases are detected while the primary tumor typically remains undetected, and because little research has been done on its primary causes. So far, few epidemiological studies, if any, have addressed possible risk factors for CUP. We analyzed data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort (N=476,940). During prospective follow-up, a total of 651 cases of incident cases of CUP were detected (ICD-O-2 code C809). Proportional hazards models were conducted to examine the associations of lifetime history of smoking habits, alcohol consumption, levels of education and anthropometric indices of adiposity with risk of being diagnosed with CUP. Risk of being diagnosed with CUP was strongly related to smoking, with a relative risk of 3.66 [95% C.I., 2.24-5.97] for current, heavy smokers (26+ cigarettes/day) compared to never smokers (adjusted for alcohol consumption, body mass index, waist circumference and level of education) and a relative risk of 5.12 [3.09-8.47] for cases with CUP who died within 12 months. For alcohol consumption and level of education, weaker associations were observed but attenuated and no longer statistically significant after adjusting for smoking and indices of obesity. Finally, risk of CUP was increased by approximately 30 per cent for subjects in the highest versus lowest quartiles of waist circumference. Our analyses provide further documentation, in addition to autopsy studies, that a substantial proportion of cancers of unknown primary site may have their origin in smoking-related tumors, in particular.

[Structured diagnostics and therapy of the CUP syndrome]

BACKGROUND

In the majority of cases, patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) have a poor prognosis with no prospect of being cured. Hence, a reasonable focus of diagnostics on its essential targets seems appropriate.

PATIENTS

Particularly important is the identification of all patients who can be assigned to subgroups with a favorable prognosis and who might benefit from a specific therapy. For all other patients, platinum-based combination therapy is the standard cytostatic therapy.

THERAPY

In addition to platinum derivatives, taxanes, gemcitabine and irinotecan can also be used. Promising innovative approaches include targeted therapies, in particular bevacizumab and erlotinib, and identification of the tissue origin with micro-RNA or gene expression analyses which can help identify the most suitable organ-specific therapy for individual patients.

PERSPECTIVES

It would be desirable if the group of patients treated with unspecific therapy could be reduced by improved diagnostics so that these patients could be treated with organ-specific therapy or with molecularly targeted approaches. Micro-RNA and gene expression analyses appear to be interesting for this purpose. Another complementary approach is to improve the treatment results of patients receiving an unspecific standard combination therapy by additional administration of new targeted substances.

[Lymph node metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary site. Is it time to change of paradigm?]

The diagnosis of carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is made after exclusion of the presence of a mucosal primary. There are two mains options for the primary treatment of CUP, either a neck node dissection followed by postoperative radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy, or a primary radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy depending on the nodal stage followed in case of residual neck disease by a selective neck dissection. There is no data to suggest the superiority of one over the other. For radiotherapy, unilateral neck or bilateral neck, including the upper aerodigestive tract mucosa are possible options. There is no definite data to demonstrate the superiority of one over the other, but owing the reduced toxicity of unilateral irradiation, and the possibility of salvage treatment in case of emergence of a mucosal primary and/or a contralateral neck node development, the former may be the preferred option. Advances in radiotherapy such as intensity modulated radiation therapy have the potential to spare organs at risk and reduce late toxicity rates. A selective irradiation approach customized on "major" criteria, such as nodal stage and level, HPV and EBV status and accessory criteria, such as histological variants, is under investigation.

An Unusual Case of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

The peritoneal surface remains an important failure site for patients with gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. In the past, oncologists regarded peritoneal carcinomatosis as an incurable component of an intra-abdominal malignancy. During the last two decades, novel therapeutic approaches have emerged for peritoneal carcinomatosis patients. We report the first case of peritoneal carcinomatosis emerging from an extra-adrenal, intra-abdominal paraganglioma. This 49-year-old male was treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy. Paragangliomas are rare tumors of neural crest-derived chromaffin cells and can originate either from the sympathetic or from the parasympathetic ganglia. It has been estimated that as many as 10% of the paragangliomas arise outside the adrenal glands. This case represents an unreported presentation of paraganglioma. Two possible origins of this malignancy, and the applied therapy, are discussed. We report the feasibility of cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of this malignancy.

[The initial CUP situation and CUP syndrome: pathological diagnostics]

"Cancer of unknown primary (site)" (CUP) represents a frequent and often difficult task for diagnostic histopathology. In the initial CUP situation, immunohistochemistry, which is relatively cost-efficient and non-burdensome for the patient, contributes substantially to the targeted search for and identification of the primary tumor. It may be performed in a two-step algorithm (keratins as the first step, group and selective markers as the second step). However, in true CUP syndrome--a heterogeneous disease whose etiology and pathogenesis is still poorly understood--the primary tumor is rarely identified, and the immunohistochemical marker profile is often anomalous. Nevertheless, immunohistochemistry remains the most important special method, aiming at the phenotypical classification and particularly the identification of certain favorable therapy-responsive subsets. Novel methods for subtyping of CUP based on the analysis of gene expression profiles need to be further evaluated before their possible diagnostic application. Future basic and clinical research is required to unravel the still enigmatic tumor biology of the CUP syndrome and to improve the hitherto very unfavorable prognosis by developing new efficient therapy regimens.