Schnellschnittdiagnostik bei Erkrankungen des weiblichen Genitaltrakts

Is sentinel lymph node assessment useful in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of underlying high-intermediate (high-IM) and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and to assess the impact of the information retrieved from the sentinel lymph node (SLN) on adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of women undergoing hysterectomy, optional bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and lymph nodes assessment for EIN between December 2007 and August 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty two (162) eligible patients were included, of whom 101 (62.3%) had a final diagnosis of EIN, while 61 (37.7%) were ultimately diagnosed with carcinoma. Out of 15 patients with high-IM to high-risk disease (9.25% of all EIN), 12 had grade 2-3 EC including 8 with >50% myometrial invasion, 2 with serous subtype, 1 with cervical invasion and 2 with pelvic lymph nodes involvement. Of the 3 patients with grade 1 EC, one patient had disease involving the adnexa and 2 patients had tumor invading >50% of the myometrium and with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Ten patients received vaginal brachytherapy after surgery, 3 patients with extrauterine spread were treated with systemic chemotherapy followed by vaginal brachytherapy and pelvic external-beam radiotherapy and 2 patients with early-stage serous carcinoma received chemotherapy followed by vaginal brachytherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Information from SLN, even when negative, can be helpful in the management of patients with EC after preoperative EIN, as some patients are found to have high-IM to high-risk disease on final pathology. These patients would require either re-staging surgery or adjuvant external beam radiotherapy, both could be avoided by proper staging.

Is routine frozen section analysis necessary in patients with non-endometrioid cancer or grade 3 endometrioid cancer?

Objective

To explore the accuracy related to type and subtype between frozen section (FS) results and final pathology results in patients with endometrial cancer and to suggest whether it should be routinely performed.

Methods

Retrospective data were collected from 184 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery at a single center (January 2014–December 2018). FS results were compared with the final pathology results with respect to histotype, tumor grade, and depth of invasion to define the accuracy of FS analysis.

Results

Frozen section analysis was performed in 141 (76.6%) patients. The accuracy rates and κ values between the FS and final pathology results with respect to histotype, tumor grade, and depth of invasion were 87.23%, 81.15%, and 98.2% and 0.41, 0.7, and 0.9, respectively (P < 0.001). Among the 18 patients with preoperative non‐endometrioid cancer (non‐EC), six underwent FS analysis, and final pathology confirmed EC in three, of whom 75% were detected by FS analysis. Eight of 19 patients with preoperative grade 3 EC underwent FS analysis and the accuracy rate was 87.5%.

Conclusion

Intraoperative FS analysis is a reliable method that can help intraoperative decision making. It should be performed routinely in patients with non‐EC and grade 3 EC.