Role of Concurrent Ultrasound Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Node Fields in Melanoma Patients Having Routine Cross-Sectional Imaging

PURPOSE

In sentinel node-positive (SN+ve) melanoma patients, active surveillance with regular ultrasound examination of the node field has become standard, rather than completion lymph node dissection (CLND). A proportion of these patients now receive adjuvant systemic therapy and have routine cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography [CT] or positron emission tomography [PET]/CT). The role of concurrent ultrasound (US) surveillance in these patients is unclear. The purpose of our study was to describe the modality of detection of nodal recurrence in SN+ve node fields.

METHODS

SN+ve melanoma patients who did not undergo CLND treated at a single institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 225 SN+ve patients with a median follow-up of 23 months were included. Of these, 119 (53%) received adjuvant systemic therapy. Eighty (36%) developed a recurrence at any site; 24 (11%) recurred first in the SN+ve field, of which 12 (5%) were confirmed node field recurrence only at 2 months follow-up. The nodal recurrences were first detected by ultrasound in seven (3%), CT in seven (3%), and PET/CT in seven (3%) patients. All nodal recurrences evident on US were also evident on PET/CT and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

The high rate of recurrences outside the node field and the identification of all US-detected nodal recurrences on concurrent cross-sectional imaging modalities suggest that routine concurrent ultrasound surveillance of the node-positive field may be unnecessary for SN+ve melanoma patients having routine cross-sectional imaging.

Advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the localization and diagnostics of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are the first station of lymph nodes that extend from the breast tumor to the axillary lymphatic drainage. The pathological status of these LNs can predict that of the entire axillary lymph node. Therefore, the accurate identification of SLNs is necessary for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The quality of life and prognosis of breast cancer patients are related to proper surgical treatment after the precise identification of SLNs. Some of the SLN tracers that have been identified include radioisotope, nano-carbon, indocyanine green (ICG), and methylene blue (MB). However, these tracers have certain limitations, such as pigmentation, radiation dangers, and the requirement for costly detection equipment. Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) have good specificity and sensitivity, and thus can compensate for some shortcomings of the mentioned tracers. This technique is also being applied to SLNB in patients with breast cancer, and can even provide an initial judgment on SLN status. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has the advantages of high distinguishability, simple operation, no radiation harm, low cost, and accurate localization; therefore, it is expected to replace the traditional biopsy methods. In addition, it can significantly enhance the accuracy of SLN localization and shorten the operation time.

Robot-assisted fluorescent sentinel lymph node identification in early-stage colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with cT1-2 colon cancer (CC) have a 10-20% risk of lymph node metastases. Sentinel lymph node identification (SLNi) could improve staging and reduce morbidity in future organ-preserving CC surgery. This pilot study aimed to assess safety and feasibility of robot-assisted fluorescence-guided SLNi using submucosally injected indocyanine green (ICG) in patients with cT1-2N0M0 CC.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 CC were included in this prospective feasibility study. Intraoperative submucosal, peritumoral injection of ICG was performed during a colonoscopy. Subsequently, the near-infrared fluorescence 'Firefly' mode of the da Vinci Xi robotic surgical system was used for SLNi. SLNs were marked with a suture, after which a segmental colectomy was performed. The SLN was postoperatively ultrastaged using serial slicing and immunohistochemistry, in addition to the standard pathological examination of the specimen. Colonoscopy time, detection time (time from ICG injection to first SLNi), and total SLNi time were measured (time from the start of colonoscopy to start of segmental resection). Intraoperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes were registered.

RESULTS

In all patients, at least one SLN was identified (mean 2.3 SLNs, SLN diameter range 1-13 mm). No tracer-related adverse events were noted. Median colonoscopy time was 12 min, detection time was 6 min, and total SLNi time was 30.5 min. Two patients had lymph node metastases present in the SLN, and there were no patients with false negative SLNs. No patient was upstaged due to ultrastaging of the SLN after an initial negative standard pathological examination. Half of the patients unexpectedly had pT3 tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted fluorescence-guided SLNi using submucosally injected ICG in ten patients with cT1-2N0M0 CC was safe and feasible. SLNi was performed in an acceptable timespan and SLNs down to 1 mm were detected. All lymph node metastases would have been detected if SLN biopsy had been performed.

Sentinel lymph node identification using contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer: review of the literature

Before breast cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and biopsy using blue dye, radioisotope (RI) with a gamma probe, or a combination of the two are mainly performed. The dye-guided method requires skilled technique to make an incision in the skin and identify SLNs without damaging the lymphatic vessels. In addition, dye-induced anaphylactic shock has been reported. To use the γ-probe-guided method, the facility must be able to handle RI. However, to overcome the drawbacks of these methods, Omoto et al. developed a new identification modality using contrast-enhanced ultrasound with an ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) in 2002. Since then, many basic experiments and clinical studies using various UCA have been reported. In particular, a number of studies in SLN detection using Sonazoid have been reported and are herein reviewed.

Is sentinel lymph node assessment useful in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of underlying high-intermediate (high-IM) and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and to assess the impact of the information retrieved from the sentinel lymph node (SLN) on adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of women undergoing hysterectomy, optional bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and lymph nodes assessment for EIN between December 2007 and August 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty two (162) eligible patients were included, of whom 101 (62.3%) had a final diagnosis of EIN, while 61 (37.7%) were ultimately diagnosed with carcinoma. Out of 15 patients with high-IM to high-risk disease (9.25% of all EIN), 12 had grade 2-3 EC including 8 with >50% myometrial invasion, 2 with serous subtype, 1 with cervical invasion and 2 with pelvic lymph nodes involvement. Of the 3 patients with grade 1 EC, one patient had disease involving the adnexa and 2 patients had tumor invading >50% of the myometrium and with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Ten patients received vaginal brachytherapy after surgery, 3 patients with extrauterine spread were treated with systemic chemotherapy followed by vaginal brachytherapy and pelvic external-beam radiotherapy and 2 patients with early-stage serous carcinoma received chemotherapy followed by vaginal brachytherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Information from SLN, even when negative, can be helpful in the management of patients with EC after preoperative EIN, as some patients are found to have high-IM to high-risk disease on final pathology. These patients would require either re-staging surgery or adjuvant external beam radiotherapy, both could be avoided by proper staging.

Comparative study of two contrast agents for intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with early breast cancer

Background

The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to locate sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer has been studied more and more in recent years. This prospective study aimed to compare periareolar injection of two different contrast agents, SonoVue^® (SNV) and Sonazoid^® (SNZ), followed by CEUS to identify SLNs in breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes.

Methods

A total of 205 patients with T1-2N0M0 breast cancer were divided into the SNV group and SNZ group. All were administered a periareolar injection of SNV or SNZ and underwent US to identify contrast-enhanced SLNs. Each contrast-enhanced SLN underwent a biopsy with blue dye and examined again by CEUS in vitro.

Results

In all cases, contrast-enhanced lymphatic vessels were clearly visualized using US soon after the periareolar injection of SNZ, and the SLNs were easily identified. The SLN identification rates were 75.27% (210/279) for SNV and 93.58% (102/109) for SNZ. Although the accuracy of detecting SLN metastasis was slightly different between the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference between those groups (P=0.615). Moreover, it was possible to identify SLNs in vitro in the SNZ group, and these could be compared with the lymph nodes (LNs) located using SNZ during the preoperative stage and with blue dye during the procedure. This helped in determining the resection requirements.

Conclusions

When comparing the subdermal use of SNV and SNZ, no significant differences in the number of detected SLNs and the diagnosis of metastatic LNs were observed. Because SLNs can be detected for a longer time in living tissues with SNZ, this contrast agent may provide more intraoperative information for complete resection of all preoperative localization of SLN.

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in determining the location of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

Background

This study aimed to explore the sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rate in breast cancer by subcutaneous and intradermal injection of ultrasound contrast agent in the mammary areola region, compared to the results achieved with methylene blue (MB).

Methods

A total of 390 breast cancer patients with planned sentinel lymph node biopsy from our breast surgery department from July 2017 to February 2019 were enrolled. All patients were subjected to preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), that involved an intracutaneous injection of 1 mL ultrasonic contrast agent (UCA) at 3 and 6 o ‘clock, as well as a subcutaneous injection of 1 mL UCA at 9 and 12 o’clock. The enhanced lymph nodes along the enhanced lymphatic vessels from the mammary areola were traced. The number of enhanced lymph nodes were recorded, and an ultrasound-guided injection of 1:10 diluted carbon nanoparticles were used to mark all first site enhanced lymph nodes (i.e., SLNs). An intraoperative dye method (MB) was used to track the SLNs and the results were compared with the CEUS findings.

Results

Among the 390 cases of breast cancer, enhanced SLNs were observed in 373 patients after an injection of UCA with an identification rate of 95.64 % (373/390), compared to the identification rate of 92.05 % (359/390) using the intraoperative MB. The difference between the two methods was statistically significant (P = 0.016). And among the 390 patients, a total of 808 enhanced lymph nodes were traced by preoperative CEUS, with a median of 2 (1,3). A total of 971 blue-stained lymph nodes were traced using the intraoperative MB, with a median of 2 (2,3), indicating a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intradermal and subcutaneous injections of UCA in the mammary areola region may have clinical application value for the identification and localization of SLNs in breast cancer patients. The identification rate is higher than that of blue dye method, which can be used as a new tracer of sentinel lymph node biopsy and complement other staining methods to improve the success rate.

Anatomical basis of lymph node detection in gynecologic cancers: a review from a surgical perspective

Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy are associated with increased risk of complications and are responsible for a significant proportion of morbidity and impaired quality of life following surgical management of pelvic malignancies. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) was developed as a trade-off between systematic and no lymphadenectomy to limit morbidity while conserving good oncological staging and outcomes. In this comprehensive review, we aimed to synthetize the anatomical basis of the SLN procedure in patients with pelvic malignancies from a surgical perspective. The reliability of the SLN procedure is based on the knowledge of the dissemination pathways for each type of tumors. The most recent understanding of the uterine lymphatic anatomy defined three consistent channels: an upper paracervical pathway (UPP) with draining medial external and/or obturator lymph nodes; a lower paracervical pathway (LPP) with draining internal iliac and/or presacral lymph nodes and the infundibulo-pelvic pathway (IPP) with a course along the fallopian tube and upper broad ligament via the infundibulo-pelvic ligament to its origin. In patients with endometrial cancer, most SLNs are located on the UPP pathway: obturator and external iliac whereas 80% of the SLNs in patients with cervical cancer are located in the external iliac, interiliac and obturator area. Surgical training is a key step toward improving detection rates and exhaustiveness of SLN research while reducing overall morbidity. This is all the more important that the indications for performing complete lymphadenectomy are becoming increasingly rare.

Sentinel lymph node processing in gynecological cancer histopathology and molecular biology

As sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are the first nodes receiving drainage from primary tumors, they provide important prognostic information about the nodal status of a tumor. SLN biopsy has modified the lymph node assessment by pathologists. This review highlights the different ways of histopathological and molecular SLN assessment according to the different gynecological cancers. Other than in breast cancer and melanoma, frozen section (FS) analysis of SLN in gynecological malignancies is still considered an important diagnostic tool. Intraoperative evaluation of the SLN allows to determine the need of completing lymph node dissection in case of metastasis. Intraoperative FS has a high negative predictive value (NPV) and is more sensitive than imprint cytology (IC) alone. If on intraoperative examination on FS the SLN is negative, subsequent analysis of the entire lymph node and histological ultrastadification has the potential to detect occult low volume metastases or to ascertain that a SLN is really negative. This reduces the morbidity compared to systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection. Inclusion of the entire lymph node tissue in paraffin blocks after cutting it in 2 mm thick slices and histopathological ultrastaging with serial sections provides important prognostic information about the need of adjuvant treatment. Three sections at 200-250 µm seem to identify the majority of micrometastases. This review discusses different histopathological protocols and molecular [qRT-PCR and one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA®)] aspects of SLN evaluation in gynecological cancer.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: state of the art

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological neoplasm in developed countries. In literature, there are discordant data regarding the therapeutic value of systematic lymphadenectomy whereas the importance of lymph node status for determining prognosis and the need for adjuvant treatment is undoubted. Given the low risk of lymph-node metastases in the apparent early-stage disease and the significant surgical and postoperative risks when performing a complete pelvic lymphadenectomy, the surgical approach in these patients is controversial, ranging from no nodal evaluation to comprehensive pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy. The recent introduction of sentinel node mapping represents the mid-way between the execution and omission of node dissection in EC patients. Indeed, the sentinel node mapping has rapidly emerged as an alternative to complete lymphadenectomy to reduce morbidity. In the present review, we discuss the role of sentinel node mapping in the surgical management of EC evaluating all aspects of this procedure.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for lung cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a technique to identify the first lymph node (or nodes) draining a tumor. The underlying principle is that as the first site of cancer spread, evaluation of the sentinel node will be most predictive for wider nodal involvement. The introduction of sentinel node biopsy revolutionized the surgical management of cutaneous melanoma and breast cancer, becoming a key component in the management of such patients. For over 20 years, thoracic surgeons have similarly worked to apply this technique to lung cancer but have thus far not had the same impact on lung surgery. In this review, we will summarize the ongoing discussions on the role of sentinel node biopsy in lung cancer, the methods for identifying the sentinel node, and the techniques for evaluating the sentinel node specimen. We will also highlight some of the pressing questions investigators should consider when designing a trial for sentinel node mapping. This will clarify the current status of sentinel node biopsy in lung cancer and thus highlight important future directions for research.

The added value of sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term oncological outcomes and the added value of sentinel lymph node sampling (SLN) compared to pelvic lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

During the evaluation phase of SLN for EC, we performed LND and SLN and retrospectively compared the oncologic outcome with the immediate non-overlapping historical era during which patients underwent LND.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2010, 193 patients underwent LND and from December 2010 to 2014, 250 patients had SLN mapping with completion LND. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics. During a median follow-up period of 6.9 years, addition of SLN was associated with more favorable oncological outcomes compared to LND with 6-year overall survival (OS) of 90% compared to 81% (p = 0.009), and progression free survival (PFS) of 85% compared to 75% (p = 0.01) respectively. SLN was associated with improved OS (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8, p = 0.004), and PFS (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9, p = 0.03) in a multivariable analysis, adjusted for age, ASA score, stage, grade, non-endometrioid histology, and LVSI. Patients who were staged with SLN were less likely to have a recurrence in the pelvis or lymph node basins compared to patients who underwent LND only (6-year recurrence-free survival 95% vs 90%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Addition of SLN to LND was ultimately associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to LND alone in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing surgical staging, suggesting that the data provided by the analysis of the SLN added relevant clinical information, and improved the decision on adjuvant therapy.

[Diagnostic value of optical imaging combined with indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis]

Objective: To systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of optical imaging combined with indocyanine green (ICG)-guided sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in gastric cancer, and to identify potential factors that would influence diagnostic accuracy. Methods: Study was carried out by searching the electronic database of PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library with keywords as "gastric/stomach" and "cancer/carcinoma/tumor/tumour/adenocarcinoma/neoplasm" and "sentinel lymph node" and "near-infrared/NIR or fluorescent imaging" and "indocyanine green/ICG" . Literature inclusion criteria: (1) gastric cancer clinical stage was cT0-3; (2) clinical stage determined by at least 2 kinds of imaging modalities; (3) optical imaging (near-infrared or fluorescence imaging) combined with ICG-guided SLN biopsy; (4) prospective study to predict lymph node metastasis; (5) intraoperative or postoperative pathology for all lymph nodes removed; (6) patients number in the literature >10 cases. Exclusion criteria: (1) patients with a history of ICG allergy or chemoradiotherapy; (2) previous history of endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection; (3) patients with a variety of gastrointestinal tumor; (4) case reports, conference abstracts, clinical guidelines, editorials, reviews, meta-analysis and correspondence letters; (5) in vitro or animal experiments; (6) insufficient diagnostic efficacy data. The meta-analysis was performed in the Stata12.0 software using the "bivariate mixed-effects model" combined with the "midas" command to pool the data. Information such as true positive value, false positive value, false negative value, and true negative value of each included articles were extracted. The literature quality assessment map was drawn to describe the overall quality of the articles; the heterogeneity analysis was performed with the forest map, with P<0.01 considered as statistical significance; the funnel plot was used to describe publication bias, with P<0.1 considered as statistically significant. Area under curve (AUC) of summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) was used to describe the diagnostic accuracy and the AUC closer to 1 indicated higher diagnostic accuracy. If there was heterogeneity (I(2)>50%) among studies, regression analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: A total of 15 studies (1020 patients) were included. The optical imaging contained near-infrared (NIR) and fluorescent imaging (FI). The diagnostic value of optical imaging combined with ICG-guided SLN biopsy in gastric cancer was as follows: the pooled sensitivity (Sen) was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.99), specificity (Spe) was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.92 to 1.00), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 30.39 (95% CI: 9.14 to 101.06), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.05 (95% CI:0.01 to 0.20), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 225.54 (95% CI: 88.81 to 572.77), AUC was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.00), threshold value was sensitivity=0.95 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.99) and specificity=1.00 (95% CI: 0.92 to 1.00). Deeks method revealed DOR funnel plot of SLN biopsy was not asymmetrical obviously with significant difference (P=0.01), which indicated remarkable publishing bias. Meta-subgroup analysis showed that compared to FI, NIR imaging had higher sensitivity (0.98 vs. 0.73); compared to 0 minutes, optical imaging performed 20 minutes after ICG injection had higher sensitivity (0.98 vs. 0.70); compared to mean detected number of SLN of 4, mean detected number≥4 had higher sensitivity (0.96 vs. 0.68); compared to HE stain, immunohistochemistry + HE had higher sensitivity (0.99 vs. 0.84); compared to subserous injection of ICG, submucosa injection of ICG had higher sensitivity (0.98 vs. 0.40); compared to injection of 5 g/L ICG, 0.5 g/L and 0.05 g/L had higher sensitivity (0.98 vs. 0.83); compared to cT2-3 tumor, early stage (cT1) tumor had higher sensitivity (0.96 vs. 0.72); compared to ≤ enrolled 26 cases in the study, > 26 cases had higher sensitivity (0.96 vs. 0.65); compared to papers before 2010, papers after 2010 had higher sensitivity (0.97 vs. 0.81); whose differences were all significant. Sensitivity differences between mean tumor diameter of ≤30 cm and >30 cm, open surgery and laparoscopic surgery, lymph node regional dissection and retrieved dissection were not significant (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Optical imaging combined with ICG-guided SLN biopsy is clinically feasible, and especially suitable for early gastric cancer. However, the ICG being used in current studies may be overdosed. Higher sensitivity may be achieved from NIR imaging when compared with FI method.

Surgical Management of Lymph Nodes in Melanoma

This article provides a comprehensive evaluation of surgical management of the lymph node basin in melanoma, with historical, anatomic, and evidence-based recommendations for practice.

Design and development of a dedicated portable gamma camera system for intra-operative imaging

PURPOSE

We developed a high performance portable gamma camera platform dedicated to identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and radio-guided surgery for cancer patients. In this work, we present the performance characteristics of SURGEOSIGHT-I, the first version of this platform that can intra-operatively provide high-resolution images of the surveyed areas.

METHODS

At the heart of this camera, there is a 43×43 array of pixelated sodium-activated cesium iodide (CsI(Na)) scintillation crystal with 1×1mm(2) pixel size and 5mm thickness coupled to a Hamamatsu H8500 flat-panel multi-anode (64 channels) photomultiplier tube. The probe is equipped with a hexagonal parallel-hole lead collimator with 1.2mm holes. The detector, collimator, and the associated front-end electronics are encapsulated in a common housing referred to as head.

RESULTS

Our results show a count rate of ∼41kcps for 20% count loss. The extrinsic energy resolution was measured as 20.6% at 140keV. The spatial resolution and the sensitivity of the system on the collimator surface was measured as 2.2mm and 142cps/MBq, respectively. In addition, the integral and differential uniformity, after uniformity correction, in useful field-of-view (UFOV) were measured 4.5% and 4.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This system can be used for a number of clinical applications including SLN biopsy and radiopharmaceutical-guided surgery.

Tracer injection sites and combinations for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to clarify the most effective combination of injected tracer types and injection sites in order to detect sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in early endometrial cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 100 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer treated at Tohoku University Hospital between June 2001 and December 2012. The procedure for SLN identification entailed either radioisotope (RI) injection into the endometrium during hysteroscopy (55 cases) or direct RI injection into the uterine cervix (45 cases). A combination of blue dye injected into the uterine cervix or uterine body intraoperatively in addition to preoperative RI injection occurred in 69 of 100 cases. All detected SLNs were recorded according to the individual tracer and the resultant staging from this method was compared to the final pathology of lymph node metastases including para-aortic nodes.

RESULTS

SLN detection rate was highest (96%) by cervical RI injection; however, no SLNs were detected in para-aortic area. Para-aortic SLNs were detected only by hysteroscopic RI injection (56%). All cases with pelvic lymph node metastases were detected by pelvic SLN biopsy. Isolated positive para-aortic lymph nodes were detected in 3 patients. Bilateral SLN detection rate was high (96%; 26 of 27 cases) by cervical RI injection combined with dye.

CONCLUSION

RI injection into the uterine cervix is highly sensitive in detection of SLN metastasis in early stage endometrial cancer. It is a useful and safe modality when combined with blue dye injection into the uterine body.