[Diagnosis and management of vascular malformations : Interdisciplinary teamwork in demand]

Towards a better treatment of patients with vascular malformations: certified interdisciplinary centers are mandatory

BACKGROUND

Vascular anomalies are orphan diseases that occur in all age groups and range from purely aesthetic to potentially life-threatening conditions. This thesis paper outlines the typical conferring problems in patient management and possible structural solutions for a better patient treatment in the future.

METHODS

A multi-perspective author panel consisting of key stakeholders from the German Interdisciplinary Society of Vascular Anomalies and the German Society for Surgery defined problem areas and possible solutions including quality indicators as criteria for certified interdisciplinary Vascular Anomalies Centers (VAC).

RESULTS

According to the literature available, clearly defined nomenclature and nosological entities often remain unused in this field, and consented diagnostic and therapeutic evidence is rare. Expert opinions dominate and in some cases lead to disparate recommendations. Typical patient problems arise from this situation, exemplified in patient vignettes. Centralized and standardized patient treatment in interdisciplinary VAC may be a solution to this problem. These centers should agree on a set of general principles and quality indicators with an additional minimum set of structural and procedural criteria.

DISCUSSION

The present position paper outlines perspectives for implementing certified interdisciplinary VAC. There is a need for a comprehensive nomenclature, access to interdisciplinary treatment centers, more scientific evidence, and further education in this rare group of diseases.

CONCLUSION

Use of scientifically sound and patient-relevant criteria for certifying the interdisciplinary quality of VAC is expected to improve health care in Germany.

Rare Diseases of the Orbit

This article provides an overview of rare orbital diseases. Congenital malformations, inflammatory diseases, benign and malignant neoplasias are described. Although it represents a relatively small area of the body the orbit contains multiple different tissues. Therefore, a great variety of diseases can be found within the orbital space. That is the reason, why both the completeness and the level of detail in the description of particular diseases must be somewhat limited. Nevertheless, clinical manifestations, important aspects of diagnosis, treatment strategies, and, when specific data are available, the prognosis are described. The authors tried to highlight the most characteristic aspects of the different diseases to describe their relevant aspects in spite of the brevity of the subsections.

[Joint tumors: rare but important differential diagnoses of malignant and benign tumors as well as pseudotumors in rheumatology]

This review article elucidates the differential diagnostics of malignant and benign joint tumors, pseudotumors of the joints and the peri-implant tissue, which are rare but important entities in rheumatology and orthopedic rheumatology. The tissue of origin includes the synovium, peri-implant tissue, peri-articular fibrous tissue and peri-articular osseous tissue. Pseudotumors can be viewed as independent but heterogeneous entities. These are essentially manifested as tumor-like depositions of crystals, calcareous deposits, vascular malformations, ectasia of the synovia and joint capsule tissue and pseudocysts. Other causes for pseudotumors are focal destructive inflammation (e.g. induced by foreign bodies), high grade synovitis and focal fibrinoid necrosis (i.e. rheumatoid nodules). Methodologically, these diagnostics are based on conventional standard staining methods, immunohistochemical analyses of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded materials and on molecular diagnostic procedures. The latter are of great importance in cases of benign and malignant joint tumors. The most important immunohistochemical markers with respect to joint tumors are S100, SM-actin, CD68, CD34, STAT6, clusterin, Muc‑4, beta-catenin and MDM2-FISH. The following markers are recommended for the differential diagnostics and typing of periarticular tumor metastases in the pathology of rheumatic diseases: AE1/AE3, CK8, p63, TTF‑1, TGB, PSA, androgen receptor, GATA, CD56, chromogranin, CDX‑2, SAT-B2, SALL4, estrogen and progesterone receptors, CD45LCA, CD30, CD79a and S100. Necrosis, inflammatory infiltrations and reparative inflammatory changes may complicate the histopathological classification. Therefore, a correlation with clinical, microbiological and radiological data in the sense of interdisciplinary synergistic diagnostics may be required.