Biopsychosocial factors should be considered when evaluating central sensitization in axial spondyloarthritis

Central sensitization: its prevalence and impact on quality of life among hemodialyzed patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

Data on the role of central sensitization in hemodialyzed patients are scarce. The aim was to identify the impact of central sensitization on quality of life and elucidate the risk factors for the development of central sensitization in patients receiving hemodialysis.

METHODS

Central sensitization, quality of life, psychological well-being, and sleep were assessed by the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS), respectively. The effect of central sensitization on quality of life and the predictors of the development of central sensitization were assessed by regression analyses.

RESULTS

The frequency of central sensitization was 48% in the study population (n = 100). Patients with central sensitization had significantly higher pain intensity, worse sleep quality, and more impaired psychological status (p < 0.05 for all). The CSI score negatively affected all quality of life domains on its own (p < 0.001 for all, adjusted R2 ranged from 0.17 to 0.47). Dialysis vintage (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.0), pain (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0), JSS (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5), and HADS-total (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.2) were determined as the independent risk factors for central sensitization (p < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that given the high frequency of central sensitization and its significant negative impact on quality of life, the presence of central sensitization should be investigated in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Central sensitization significantly deteriorates functionality and the interpretation of self-reported disease activity in primary Sjögren's syndrome

BACKGROUND

Central sensitization has a major role in health-related parameters in musculoskeletal conditions. There is still a lack of understanding regarding the impact of central sensitization on the interpretation of disease activity and functional disability in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS).

METHODS

The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was used to screen for central sensitization. Disease-related parameters, including objective tests, medication use, the EULAR SS Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI), and the EULAR SS Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), were assessed. Functionality, quality of life, sleep, and mental health were evaluated by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively. The effect of central sensitization on functionality and disease activity measures was assessed by regression analyses.

RESULTS

The frequency of central sensitization was 65% in patients with pSS (n = 60). Patients with central sensitization had higher HAQ-DI, ESSPRI, HADS, and JSS and lower SF-36 subdomain scores (p < 0.05 for all). A significant positive correlation was observed between the CSI score and the ESSPRI, JSS, HAQ-DI, and HADS scores (Spearman's rho ranging from 0.342 to 0.739). The multiple regression analysis indicated that CSI was independently associated with HAQ-DI (adjusted R2 = 0.19, B = 0.01) and ESSPRI (adjusted R2 = 0.45, B = 0.08) (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that central sensitization has a major impact on functionality and the interpretation of self-reported disease activity in pSS. When devising strategies for the management of patients with pSS, it is crucial to consider these close relationships. Key Points • The frequency of central sensitization accompanying primary Sjögren's syndrome is considerable. • Central sensitization was independently associated with functionality and self-reported disease activity assessment. • This close association leads to challenges in functionality, evaluating treatment response, and planning or switching between therapies in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Association of nociplastic and neuropathic pain components with the presence of residual symptoms in patients with axial spondyloarthritis receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of nociplastic (NoP) and neuropathic pain (NP) components with residual symptoms in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

METHODS

78 patients with r-axSpA from the GErman SPondyloarthritis Inception Cohort receiving a bDMARD for at least 3 months were included in this analysis. The Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and the PainDETECT (PD) questionnaire were used to quantify the NoP and the NP components, respectively. Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) were used as measures of residual symptoms. C reactive protein (CRP) was used as a measure of systemic inflammatory activity. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses of disease activity were performed. The regions of the WPI score and items of the PD score were used for cluster analyses.

RESULTS

Linear multivariable regression analysis showed that WPI and PD were independently associated with ASDAS (b=0.1, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.17, and b=0.05, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.08, respectively) and BASDAI (b=0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.39, and b=0.17, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.25, respectively) in r-axSpA patients receiving stable treatment with bDMARDs. Furthermore, WPI and PD were found to be significantly associated with the presence of relevant residual symptoms as defined by BASDAI ≥4 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.15, and OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.85, respectively). The effects were present also in patients with normal level of CRP. Cluster analysis revealed three distinct pain distribution profiles and four specific sensory symptom constellations allowing differentiation of different pain subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Both NoP and NP components seem to be associated with residual symptoms in patients with r-axSpA receiving treatment with bDMARDs.

The relation of psychological status and type D personality with central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis: everything is in your mind!

To evaluate the relation of psychosocial parameters and type D personality with central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study included 126 patients with knee OA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Sociodemographic variables (age, gender, education, marital status, annual income), alcohol consumption/smoking, body mass index, comorbidities, and duration of symptoms were noted. Radiographic evaluation was performed according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index was used for clinical evaluation. Type D personality, negative affectivity, and social inhibition were evaluated using the type D Scale-14 (DS14). Central sensitization was assessed by the central sensitization inventory (CSI), while psychological status, quality of life, and sleep were assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), an abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS), respectively. The effect of type D personality on study parameters including central sensitization, as well as the risk factors for the development of central sensitization were assessed by regression analyses. Patients with type D personality had higher CSI, HADS scores and lower WHOQOL-BREF scores for psychological health, social relationship, environment and general quality of life. Linear regression analysis showed that the DS14 total score has a significant positive relation with CSI (β = 0.4, p < 0.05), HADS-depression (β = 0.4, p < 0.05), HADS-anxiety (β = 0.5, p < 0.05), and HADS-total scores (β = 0.5, p < 0.05). It also had a significant negative effect on all domains of WHOQOL-BREF (p < 0.05 for all). Logistic regression analysis revealed that JSS [Odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94; p = 0.003] and negative affectivity (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94; p = 0.008) were independent risk factors for the development of central sensitization in knee OA. Type D personality has an impact on quality of life, central sensitization, and psychological health, with negative affectivity and sleep impairment serving as independent risk factors for central sensitization. While managing patients with knee OA, these intimate relationships should be taken into consideration.

Evaluation of the relationship between blood cell markers and inflammation, disease activity, and general health status in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the relation of systemic immune inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index, and systemic inflammation aggregate index with disease activity, functional status, and general health status in ankylosing spondylitis.

METHODS

Patients with ankylosing spondylitis and healthy volunteers were included in this cross-sectional study. Demographic data; disease activity measurements such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein, and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate; functional status such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; and general health status such as the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index of the patients were recorded. C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index, and systemic inflammation aggregate index values were recorded. Patients were grouped as active and remission according to the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score and as inactive-low and high-very high disease activity according to the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score. The correlation of laboratory parameters with disease-related parameters was tested.

RESULTS

The indexes were significantly higher in patients compared to controls (p<0.001, for platelet to lymphocyte ratio p=0.03). No significant differences existed in any blood cell-derived indexes among patient groups categorized by disease activity (p<0.05 for all). Systemic immune inflammation index was weakly correlated with Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (ρ=0.197 and p=0.049) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ρ=0.201 and p=0.045). Systemic immune inflammation index was not correlated with Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, and Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index. No correlation was found between other indexes and disease-related variables. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index, and systemic inflammation aggregate index showed a weak positive correlation with C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ρ=0.200-0.381).

CONCLUSION

Systemic immune inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index, and systemic inflammation aggregate index can be used to indicate systemic inflammatory burden in ankylosing spondylitis patients. However, these indexes are not effective in indicating patients' disease activity, general health status, and functional status.