CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography

The feasibility of differentiating colorectal cancer from normal and inflammatory thickening colon wall using CT texture analysis

To investigate the diagnostic value of texture analysis (TA) for differentiating between colorectal cancer (CRC), colonic lesions caused by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and normal thickened colon wall (NTC) on computed tomography (CT) and assess which scanning phase has the highest differential diagnostic value. In all, 107 patients with CRC, 113 IBD patients with colonic lesions, and 96 participants with NTC were retrospectively enrolled. All subjects underwent multiphase CT examination, including pre-contrast phase (PCP), arterial phase (AP), and portal venous phase (PVP) scans. Based on these images, classification by TA and visual classification by radiologists were performed to discriminate among the three tissue types. The performance of TA and visual classification was compared. Precise TA classification results (error, 2.03–12.48%) were acquired by nonlinear discriminant analysis for CRC, IBD and NTC, regardless of phase or feature selection. PVP images showed a better ability to discriminate the three tissues by comprising the three scanning phases. TA showed significantly better performance in discriminating CRC, IBD and NTC than visual classification for residents, but there was no significant difference in classification between TA and experienced radiologists. TA could provide useful quantitative information for the differentiation of CRC, IBD and NTC on CT, particularly in PVP images.

Differentiation between malignant and benign rectal tumors by dual-energy computed tomography - a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

To assess the performance of Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) in the differentiation between benign and malignant tumors in the rectum.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 8 subjects with rectal tumors suspected to be an early rectal cancer during colonoscopy. All subjects underwent Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Endorectal Ultrasound (ERUS) for staging. Furthermore, all subjects underwent fast switching of tube voltage between 80 and 140 kVp DECT of the pelvis. The 8 subjects had histopathological verified benign adenomas after transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection (TEM). The 8 subjects were matched with 8 consecutively selected subjects with histopathologically verified malignant rectal tumors. The DECT images were analyzed to assess the difference between malignant and benign rectal tumors. All DECT images were reviewed by experienced radiologists. In each DECT scanning, we applied three regions of interest (ROIs) for the acquisition of the DECT unique quantitative parameters. The mean atomic mass (effective Z value), iodine concentration, dual energy ratio (DER) and dual-energy index (DEI) was determined in both groups.

RESULTS

The comparison of the 2 groups showed a significant difference in effective Z and a nonsignificant difference regarding iodine concentration, DER, and DEI in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Dual-energy CT demonstrated a difference in the mean atomic mass in benign colorectal tumors in comparison to malignant colorectal tumors.

Three-dimensional computed tomography rendering of pedunculated colon polyp: new "clapper-bell" sign pedunculated polyp at 3D computed tomography

The incidental detection of a tubulovillous adenoma at a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) with nondedicated protocol, performed in emergency conditions, is an uncommon finding. We report a case of a woman presenting with a subocclusive episode. A CECT scan was performed, and a pedunculated polyp could be appreciated at 3D-reconstruction images. A particular depiction of pedunculus of the polypoid lesion, resemble a clapper-bell, could help to define the vegetating lesion at the volume-rendering reconstruction images. This case emphasizes the fundamental role of postprocessing in the clinical practice to improve the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal CT scan. In addition, a potential new radiologic sign, the "clapper-bell sign", is proposed, as literature about the appearance of a polyp at CECT, performed without a dedicated protocol for colonoscopy, is poor.

Computed Tomography Colonography Phantom: Construction, Validation and Literature Review

Background

Several dedicated computed tomography (CT) colonography phantoms have been described previously.

Objectives

To compare their pros and cons and describe the construction of a dedicated phantom that can be easily manufactured.

Materials and Methods

We found 15 different phantom designs by literature search and compared their advantages and disadvantages based on their description and images. We tested various materials for density and mechanical properties and constructed a phantom from polypropylene pipes (30 mm and 50 mm in diameter, 52 cm in length). Haustral folds were created by heat shaping and 39 intermediate sessile polyps with a target size of 6-10 mm and two flat lesions were created from silicone. Nine polyps were attached to a fold. The model was placed in a 30-cm barrel filled with water to simulate attenuation of human body. Attenuation of polyps was compared to intermediate polyps found in patients.

Results

None of the earlier colonic phantoms found in the literature incorporated all the properties that would ensure both reproducibility and validity of the model (including a rigid wall, density of the wall and polyps similar to human colon, at least two levels of distension and durability). In the present phantom, the average size of sessile polyps was 8.6 ± 0.9 mm and their density was 53 ± 24 HU. We found no significant difference in polyp density between simulated polyps in the phantom and polyps in human subjects (P = 0.70). All polyps, with the exception of one flat lesion, were detected by computer aided detection.

Conclusion

We constructed and validated a CT colonography phantom with correct density allowing performance of reproducible experiments.

Texture Feature Extraction and Analysis for Polyp Differentiation via Computed Tomography Colonography

Image textures in computed tomography colonography (CTC) have great potential for differentiating non-neoplastic from neoplastic polyps and thus can advance the current CTC detection-only paradigm to a new level with diagnostic capability. However, image textures are frequently compromised, particularly in low-dose CT imaging. Furthermore, texture feature extraction may vary, depending on the polyp spatial orientation variation, resulting in variable results. To address these issues, this study proposes an adaptive approach to extract and analyze the texture features for polyp differentiation. Firstly, derivative (e.g. gradient and curvature) operations are performed on the CT intensity image to amplify the textures with adequate noise control. Then Haralick co-occurrence matrix (CM) is used to calculate texture measures along each of the 13 directions (defined by the first and second order image voxel neighbors) through the polyp volume in the intensity, gradient and curvature images. Instead of taking the mean and range of each CM measure over the 13 directions as the so-called Haralick texture features, Karhunen-Loeve transform is performed to map the 13 directions into an orthogonal coordinate system so that the resulted texture features are less dependent on the polyp orientation variation. These simple ideas for amplifying textures and stabilizing spatial variation demonstrated a significant impact for the differentiating task by experiments using 384 polyp datasets, of which 52 are non-neoplastic polyps and the rest are neoplastic polyps. By the merit of area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic, the innovative ideas achieved differentiation capability of 0.8016, indicating the CTC diagnostic feasibility.

Dual-energy CT colonography for preoperative "one-stop" staging in patients with colonic neoplasia

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) colonography (DECTC) as a preoperative staging tool in patients with clinically suspected colorectal cancer (CRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients with colorectal neoplasia underwent preoperative abdominal DECTC on a dual-source scanner (SOMATOM Definition Flash; Siemens) operated at tube potentials of Sn140/100 kVp. Scans were evaluated for local tumor stage and the presence of synchronous intracolonic and extracolonic findings using dual-energy color-coded images. An enhancement ≥25 Hounsfield units (HU) was defined to indicate malignancy. Patients' effective doses were calculated.

RESULTS

Preoperative DECTC allowed for complete bowel evaluation in all patients, including subjects with stenosing CRC. DECTC revealed 22 carcinomas (mean enhancement, 47 ± 12 HU). In total, 22 synchronous intracolonic lesions were detected, including 19 adenomas (mean enhancement, 51 ± 19 HU). Benign structures showed enhancement <25 HU. Comparing DECTC to histopathology, 95% carcinomas and 71% synchronous lesions proximal to stenosing CRC could be verified. Mean estimated effective dose was 13.0 ± 5.2 mSv.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative DECTC can be used as an accurate and dose-efficient primary-staging examination. Especially after incomplete optical colonoscopy, virtual colonoscopy enables full preoperative colonic assessment on the same day. Dual-energy CT enables distinction between neoplasia and non-neoplastic findings within and outside the colon. Therefore, DECTC can be regarded as a promising "one-stop" staging examination in patients with clinically suspected CRC.

The feasibility of colorectal cancer detection using dual-energy computed tomography with iodine mapping

AIM

To assess the feasibility of colorectal cancer detection using dual-energy computed tomography with iodine mapping and without bowel preparation or bowel distension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients scheduled for preoperative staging computed tomography (CT) because of diagnosed or high suspicion for colorectal cancer were prospectively included in the study. A single contrast-enhanced abdominal CT acquisition using dual-source mode (100 kV/140 kV) was performed without bowel preparation. Weighted average 120 kV images and iodine maps were created with post-processing. Two observers performed a blinded read for colorectal lesions after being trained on three colorectal cancer patients. One observer performed an unblinded read for lesion detectability and placed a region of interest (ROI) within each lesion.

RESULTS

In total 21 patients were included and 18 had a colorectal cancer at the time of the CT acquisition. Median cancer size was 43 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 27-60 mm] and all 18 colorectal cancers were visible on the 120 kV images and iodine map during the unblinded read. During the blinded read, observers found 90% (27/30) of the cancers with 120 kV images only and 96.7% (29/30) after viewing the iodine map in addition (p = 0.5). Median enhancement of colorectal cancers was 29.9 HU (IQR 23.1-34.6). The largest benign lesions (70 and 25 mm) were visible on the 120 kV images and iodine map, whereas four smaller benign lesions (7-15 mm) were not.

CONCLUSION

Colorectal cancers are visible on the contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT without bowel preparation or insufflation. Because of the patient-friendly nature of this approach, further studies should explore its use for colorectal cancer detection in frail and elderly patients.

Evaluation of colonic lesions and pitfalls in CT colonography: a systematic approach based on morphology, attenuation and mobility

Computed tomographic colonography is a reliable technique for the detection and classification of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions of the colon. It is based on a thin-section CT dataset of the cleansed and air-distended colon, acquired in prone and supine position. Two-dimensional and 3D projections are used in combination for image interpretation. The evaluation of CT colonography datasets is based on two steps, lesion perception to detect a polyp candidate and image interpretation to correctly characterize colonic filling defects. A thorough knowledge of the morphologic and attenuation characteristics of common colonic lesions and artifacts facilitates characterization of the findings. The purpose of this review article is to give an overview of the key CT colonographic imaging criteria to correctly characterize common colorectal lesions and to identify typical pitfalls and pseudolesions.

Colon distension and scan protocol for CT-colonography: an overview

This article reviews two important aspects of CT-colonography, namely colonic distension and scan parameters. Adequate distension should be obtained to visualize the complete colonic lumen and optimal scan parameters should be used to prevent unnecessary radiation burden. For optimal distension, automatic carbon dioxide insufflation should be performed, preferably via a thin, flexible catheter. Hyoscine butylbromide is - when available - the preferred spasmolytic agent because of the positive effect on insufflation and pain/burden and its low costs. Scans in two positions are required for adequate distension and high polyp sensitivity and decubitus position may be used as an alternative for patients unable to lie in prone position. The great intrinsic contrast between air or tagging and polyps allows the use of low radiation dose. Low-dose protocol without intravenous contrast should be used when extracolonic findings are deemed unimportant. In patients suspected for colorectal cancer, normal abdominal CT scan protocols and intravenous contrast should be used in supine position for the evaluation of extracolonic findings. Dose reduction can be obtained by lowering the tube current and/or voltage. Tube current modulation reduces the radiation dose (except in obese patients), and should be used when available. Iterative reconstructions is a promising dose reducing tool and dual-energy CT is currently evaluated for its applications in CT-colonography. This review also provides our institution's insufflation procedure and scan parameters.

Computed tomographic colonography: Hope or hype?

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a promising emerging technology for imaging of the colon. This concise review discusses the currently available data on CTC technique, test characteristics, acceptance, safety, cost-effectiveness, follow-up strategy, and extracolonic findings. In summary, CTC technique is still evolving, and further research is needed to clarify the role of automated colonic insufflation, smooth-muscle relaxants, intravenous and oral contrast, software rendering, and patient positioning. Currently, full bowel preparation is still required to achieve optimal results. The sensitivity for detecting large polyps (> 1 cm) can be as high as 85%, with specificity of up to 97%. These test characteristics are almost comparable to those of conventional colonoscopy. Patient acceptance of CTC is generally higher than that for colonoscopy, especially in patients who have never undergone either procedure. CTC is generally safe, although uncommon instances of colonic perforation have been documented. In terms of cost-effectiveness, most decision analyses have concluded that CTC would only be cost-effective if it were considerably cheaper than conventional colonoscopy. The proper follow-up strategy for small polyps or incidental extracolonic findings discovered during CTC is still under debate. At present, the exact clinical role of virtual colonoscopy still awaits determination. Even though widespread CTC screening is not available today, in the future there may eventually be a role for this technology. Technological advances in this area will undoubtedly continue, with multi-detector row CT scanners allowing thinner collimation and higher resolution images. Stool-tagging techniques are likely to evolve and may eventually allow for low-preparation CTC. Perceptual and fatigue-related reading errors can potentially be minimized with the help of computer-aided detection software. Further research will define the exact role of this promising technology in our diagnostic armamentarium.

Automatic polyp detection and measurement with computed tomographic colonography: A phantom study

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) software in detecting and measuring polyps for CT Colonography, based on an in vitro phantom study.

Material and methods

A colon phantom was constructed with a PVC pipe of 3.8 cm diameter. Nine simulated polyps of various sizes (3.2mm-25.4mm) were affixed inside the phantom that was placed in a water bath. The phantom was scanned on a 64-slice CT scanner with tube voltage of 120 kV and current of 205 mAs. Two separate scans were performed, with different slice thickness and reconstruction interval. The first scan (thin) had a slice thickness of 1mm and reconstruction interval 0.5mm. The second scan (thick) had a slice thickness of 2mm and reconstruction interval of 1mm. Images from both scans were processed using CT Colonography software that automatically segments the colon phantom and applies CAD that automatically highlights and provides the size (maximum and minimum diameters, volume) of each polyp. Two readers independently measured each polyp (two orthogonal diameters) using both 2D and 3D views. Readers’ manual measurements (diameters) and automatic measurements from CAD (diameters and volume) were compared to actual polyp sizes as measured by mechanical calipers.

Results

All polyps except the smallest (3.2mm) were detected by CAD. CAD achieved 100% sensitivity in detecting polyps ≥6mm. Mean errors in CAD automated volume measurements for thin and thick slice scans were 8.7% and 6.8%, respectively. Almost all CAD and manual readers’ 3D measurements overestimated the size of polyps to variable extent. Both over- and underestimation of polyp sizes were observed in the readers’ manual 2D measurements. Overall, Reader 1 (expert) had smaller mean error than Reader 2 (non-expert).

Conclusion

CAD provided accurate size measurements for all polyps, and results were comparable to the two readers' manual measurements

Volume rendering with color coding of tagged stool during endoluminal fly-through CT colonography: effect on reading efficiency

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. This study was conducted to evaluate a newly developed technique for discriminative color coding of tagged stool during three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal fly-through computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to determine its effect on reading efficiency. Thirty patients, including three dropouts, were prepared with moderate cathartic preparation (20 mg bisacodyl, three doses of 200 mL of 5% wt/vol barium sulfate). Images were reviewed by two independent readers with and without color coding. Reader preference, interpretation time, and diagnostic performance were evaluated. Both reviewers preferred color coding. With color coding, interpretation time was shortened by 3 minutes (reader 1, P = .002) and 2.5 minutes (reader 2, P = .009); sensitivity for 6-mm-diameter or larger lesions remained constant at 96% (24 of 25; 95% confidence interval: 78.9%, <100%; P = >.99). This technique facilitates primary 3D interpretation of images obtained with moderate cathartic preparation.

Diagnostic accuracy and tolerability of contrast enhanced CT colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

We compared the accuracy and tolerability of intravenous contrast enhanced spiral computed tomography colonography (CTC) and optical colonoscopy (OC) for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic patients for colorectal neoplasia.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed in 48 patients with symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer. Spiral CTC was performed in supine and prone positions after colonic cleansing. The axial, 2D MPR and virtual endoluminal views were analyzed. Results of spiral CTC were compared with OC which was done within 15 days. The psychometric tolerance test was asked to be performed for both CTC and colonoscopy after the procedure.

RESULTS

Ten lesions in 9 of 48 patients were found in CTC and confirmed with OC. Two masses and eight polyps, consisted of 1 tubulovillous, 1 tubular, 2 villous adenoma, 4 adenomatous polyp, 4 adenocarcinoma, were identified. Lesion prevalence was 21%. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values were found 100%, 87%, 89%, 67% and 100%, respectively. Psychometric tolerance test showed that CTC significantly more comfortable comparing with OC (p=0.00). CTC was the preferred method in 37% while OC was preferred in 6% of patients. In both techniques, the most unpleasant part was bowel cleansing.

CONCLUSION

Contrast enhanced CTC is a highly accurate method in detecting colorectal lesions. Since the technique was found to be more comfortable and less time consuming compare to OE, it may be preferable in management of symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer.

Fundamental elements for successful performance of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy)

There are many factors affecting the successful performance of CT colonography (CTC). Adequate colonic cleansing and distention, the optimal CT technique and interpretation with using the newest CTC software by a trained reader will help ensure high accuracy for lesion detection. Fecal and fluid tagging may improve the diagnostic accuracy and allow for reduced bowel preparation. Automated carbon dioxide insufflation is more efficient and may be safer for colonic distention as compared to manual room air insufflation. CT scanning should use thin collimation of < or =3 mm with a reconstruction interval of < or =1.5 mm and a low radiation dose. There is not any one correct method for the interpretation of CTC; therefore, readers should be well-versed with both the primary 3D and 2D reviews. Polyps detected at CTC should be measured accurately and reported following the "polyp size-based" patient management system. The time-intensive nature of CTC and the limited resources for training radiologists appear to be the major barriers for implementing CTC in Korea.

Colorectal polyps on portal phase contrast-enhanced CT colonography: lesion attenuation and distinction from tagged feces

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to determine the attenuation of colorectal polyps on portal phase contrast-enhanced CT colonography (CTC) and evaluate whether enhanced polyps can be clearly distinguished from tagged feces during CTC review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our institutional review board approved this study and waived patient informed consent. Forty-eight colonoscopy-proven polyps (6-20 mm) and 41 polypoid tagged feces (6-19 mm) were selected from contrast-enhanced CTC performed without (n = 37 examinations) and with (n = 10 examinations) fecal tagging, respectively. Scanning was performed 72 seconds after i.v. injection of 150 mL of contrast material at a rate of 2.5 mL/s. Fecal tagging consisted of three doses of 200 mL of 5% weight/volume (w/v) barium sulfate suspension taken at each meal the day before CTC. Attenuation of the polyps and tagged feces was measured. Four independent blinded radiologists reviewed the polyps and tagged feces at both wide (width, 1,500 H; level -400 H) and soft-tissue (width, 400 H; level, 20 H) window settings to distinguish them by using subjective visual assessment.

RESULTS

Polyp attenuation on the portal phase was not correlated with size (R = -0.003; p = 0.99) and was not different between histologic types (p = 0.884). Enhanced polyps (mean +/- SD, 119.9 +/- 25.3 H; range, 50-173 H) showed significantly lower attenuation than did tagged feces (1,521.4 +/- 683.6 H; range, 495-2,683 H) without any overlap (p < 0.0005). An 8-mm sessile adenomatous polyp was misinterpreted as tagged feces by one reviewer. The rest of the lesions were correctly interpreted by all reviewers, resulting in high interobserver agreement (kappa value, 0.988).

CONCLUSION

Polyp attenuation on portal phase contrast-enhanced CTC ranges from 50 to 173 H. Contrast-enhanced polyps are clearly and consistently distinguished from barium-tagged polypoid feces.

Value of multi-slice computed tomography in preoperative "one-station-style" examination for colon cancer

AIM: To assess the value of three-phase contrasted multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) pneumocolon in preoperative examina-tion of colon cancer.

METHODS: Sixty-three patients with colonic cancer underwent plain MSCT pneumocolon and multiphase contrasted MSCT within 1 week before operation. Contrasted MSCT scans were performed using 16-slices CT system (Toshiba aquilion16) 22 s (phaseⅠ), 37-40 s (phaseⅡ) and 60 s (phase Ⅲ) after intravenous administration of contrast medium. Images were then obtained by CT colonography (CTC), X-ray projection (XRP), multi-planar reformation (MPR), surface shadow display (SSD), CT angiography (CTA) in post-procession workstation. The results were comparatively analyzed with the surgical pathology.

RESULTS: Sixty-four cancer lesions were detected on CT images and in surgery. They located in ascending colon (18 lesions), hepatic flexure of colon (2 lesions), transverse colon (4 lesions), splenic flexure of colon (2 lesions), descending colon (6 lesions), sigmoid (20 lesions, of which 5 lesions in the injunction of sigmoid and rectum), and rectum (12 lesions). Extracolonic diseases were found in 16 patients by MSCT or surgery. On multi-phase contrasted CT images, colon caner lesions demonstrated homogeneous or inhomogenous enhancement, and the absolutely increased peaks in CT density were at phase Ⅱ (30 lesions), phase Ⅱ-Ⅲ (17 lesions), phase Ⅲ (13 lesions) and phaseⅠ-Ⅲ (4 lesions). CTA detected blood-supplying artery of 58 cancer lesions (90.6%). The sensitivity, specificity and positive accuracy were 100%, 64.2%, and 92.1% respectively, for pericolonic fat involvement, and 78.5%, 86.7%, and 86.1% respectively, for abdominal metastasis-positive lymph-nodes.

CONCLUSION: MSCT pneumocolon and preoperative three-phase contrasted CT can provide information about tumor location, number, stage, blood-supplying artery and extracolonic diseases.

Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography

Our purpose was to assess the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on lesion detection as a second reader in computed tomographic colonography, and to compare the influence of CAD on the performance of readers with different levels of expertise. Fifty-two CT colonography patient data-sets (37 patients: 55 endoscopically confirmed polyps > or =0.5 cm, seven cancers; 15 patients: no abnormalities) were retrospectively reviewed by four radiologists (two expert, two nonexpert). After primary data evaluation, a second reading augmented with findings of CAD (polyp-enhanced view, Siemens) was performed. Sensitivities and reading time were calculated for each reader without CAD and supported by CAD findings. The sensitivity of expert readers was 91% each, and of nonexpert readers, 76% and 75%, respectively, for polyp detection. CAD increased the sensitivity of expert readers to 96% (P = 0.25) and 93% (P = 1), and that of nonexpert readers to 91% (P = 0.008) and 95% (P = 0.001), respectively. All four readers diagnosed 100% of cancers, but CAD alone only 43%. CAD increased reading time by 2.1 min (mean). CAD as a second reader significantly improves sensitivity for polyp detection in a high disease prevalence population for nonexpert readers. CAD causes a modest increase in reading time. CAD is of limited value in the detection of cancer.

Pitfalls in Multi–Detector Row CT Colonography: A Systematic Approach

Thin-section multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a powerful tool for the detection and classification of colonic lesions. However, each step in the process of a CT colonographic examination carries the potential for misdiagnosis. Suboptimal patient preparation, CT scanning protocol deficiencies, and perception and interpretation errors can lead to false-positive and false-negative findings, adversely affecting the diagnostic performance of CT colonography. These problems and pitfalls can be overcome with a variety of useful techniques and observations. A relatively clean, dry, and well-distended colon can be achieved with careful patient preparation, thereby avoiding the problem of residual stool and fluid. Knowledge of the morphologic and attenuation characteristics of common colonic lesions and artifacts can help identify bulbous haustral folds, impacted diverticula, an inverted appendiceal stump, or mobile polyps, any of which may pose problems for the radiologist. A combined two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging approach is recommended for each colonic finding. A thorough knowledge of the various pitfalls and pseudolesions that may be encountered at CT colonography, along with use of dedicated problem-solving techniques, will help the radiologist differentiate between definite colonic lesions and pseudolesions.

CT colonography: techniques, indications, findings

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a minimally invasive technique for imaging the entire colon. Based on a helical thin-section CT of the cleansed and air-distended colon, two-dimensional and three-dimensional projections are used for image interpretation. Several clinical improvements in patient preparation, technical advances in CT, and new developments in evaluation software have allowed CTC to develop into a powerful diagnostic tool. It is already well established as a reliable diagnostic tool in symptomatic patients. Many experts currently consider CTC a comparable alternative to conventional colonoscopy, although there is still debate about its sensitivity for the detection of colonic polyps in a screening population. This article summarizes the main indications, the current techniques in patient preparation, data acquisition and data analysis as well as imaging features for common benign and malignant colorectal lesions.

Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the usefulness of combined polyethylene glycol solution plus contrast medium bowel preparation (PEG-C preparation) followed by dual-contrast computed tomography enema (DCCTE) and conventional colonoscopy. The main purpose of these examinations is the preoperative staging of already known tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients with colorectal tumors were alternately allocated to either a polyethylene glycol solution preparation (PEG preparation) group (n=50) or a PEG-C preparation group (n=50) before undergoing conventional colonoscopy and computed tomographic (CT) colonography. After conventional colonoscopy, multidetector row CT scans were performed. Air images were reconstructed for both groups; contrast medium images were additionally reconstructed for the PEG-C preparation group. DCCTE images were a composite of air images and contrast medium images without use of dedicated electronic cleansing software. Quality scores (the presence or absence of blind spots of the colon) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Complete tumor images were obtained by DCCTE for all 50 (100%) lesions in the PEG-C preparation group, as compared with only nine of the 50 lesions (18%) in the PEG preparation group (air-contrast CT enema). The overall quality score in the PEG-C preparation group was significantly better than that in the PEG preparation group (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

DCCTE showed the entire colon without blind spots in nearly all patients in the PEG-C preparation group because the areas under residual fluid were reconstructed as contrast medium images. DCCTE and conventional colonoscopy after PEG-C preparation are feasible and safe procedures that can be used for preoperative evaluation in patients with colorectal cancer.

Perceptive errors in CT colonography

Published results to date have indicated a good per patient sensitivity of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) for colorectal cancer and for polyps measuring 10 mm or more together with a very good specificity. Sensitivity and specificity for polyps in the range of 6-10 mm are moderate. These results, however, can be achieved only with meticulous attention to technique including adequate colonic distention, and acquisition of supine and prone thin-section computed tomographic (CT) images. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve involved in the interpretation of CTC studies, with performance statistics improving with operator experience. Radiologists must be comfortable in reporting directly from workstation monitors and have access to and be familiar with software for multiplanar and endoluminal reconstructions. In addition to maximize polyp detection and minimize false positive results, reporting radiologists must have a working knowledge of normal colorectal anatomy and pathology on CTC and be familiar with potential pitfalls in interpretation. Besides the description of several possible causes for perceptive errors, also a literature search of perceptive errors in CTC is included in this paper.

Assessment of polyp and mass histopathology by intravenous contrast-enhanced CT colonography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We sought to demonstrate that intravenous contrast-enhanced CT colonography (CTC) can distinguish colonic adenomas from carcinomas.

METHODS

Supine intravenous contrast-enhanced CTC with colonoscopic and/or surgical correlation was performed on 25 patients with colonic adenomas or carcinomas. Standard deviation of mean polyp CT attenuation was computed and assessed using ANOVA and receiver-operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

Colonoscopy confirmed 32 polyps or masses 1 to 8 cm in size. The standard deviations of CT attenuation were carcinomas (n = 13; 36 +/- 6 HU; range 28-48 HU) and adenomas (n = 19; 49 +/- 14 HU; range 31-100 HU) (P = 0.005). At a standard deviation threshold of 42 HU, the sensitivity and specificity for classifying a polyp or mass as a carcinoma were 92% and 79%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.89 +/- 0.06 (95% confidence interval 0.73-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of the standard deviation of CT attenuation on intravenous contrast-enhanced CTC permits histopathologic classification of polyps 1 cm or larger as carcinomas versus adenomas. The presence of ulceration or absence of muscular invasion in carcinomas creates overlap with adenomas, reducing the specificity of carcinoma classification.

Evaluation of benign and malignant rectal lesions with CT colonography and endoscopic correlation

Colorectal carcinoma is a significant cause of death from cancer in the United States, and early detection and treatment are critical. Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a noninvasive, rapidly evolving technique that is a potential alternative to conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Rectal disease (eg, polyps, cancerous lesions, extramucosal lesions, inflammatory disease) can be especially challenging to diagnose with CT colonography because of several factors that can simulate or obscure the disease (eg, over- or underdistention, rectal tube, stool, artifacts). Familiarity with the spectrum of rectal diseases and with the potential pitfalls and technical limitations of CT colonography will help minimize interpretative and perceptual errors.

Characterization of Normal Ileocecal Valve Density on CT Colonography

The objective of this study was to evaluate normal ileocecal valve (ICV) attenuation and composition on CT colonography (CTC). Two hundred twelve patients who underwent CTC at the authors' institution were retrospectively identified. Two independent readers recorded three region-of-interest (ROI) measurements, which were used to determine mean ICV density. ICV attenuation measurements were compared with age and abdominal body fat using Pearson correlation. A subjective classification system was applied to characterize the relative fat and soft tissue density of the ICV. Mean ICV density was -26.3+/-14 HU (range -60.1 to 18.3 HU). There was no correlation between the fat content of the ICV and age (r=0.06) or body fat (r=-0.47). The majority of valves (83.5%) were classified as heterogeneously low density or heterogeneously high density, whereas a small fraction of valves (6.1%) were categorized as homogeneously low density. The results of this study suggest that ICVs have a varying range of densities, and this feature alone cannot be used to distinguish the ICV from a polyp or neoplastic lesion on CTC.

CT colonography: contrast enhancement of benign and malignant colorectal lesions versus fecal residuals

We retrospectively reviewed the computed tomographic colonographic datasets of 22 patients. Mean attenuation values of benign polyps before and after contrast administration were 30 +/- 15 HU and 90 +/- 18 HU, respectively. Mean attenuation values of colorectal cancer before and after contrast administration were 43 +/- 15 HU and 124 +/- 18 HU, respectively. The mean attenuation value of solid fecal residuals was 43 +/- 15 HU. The difference in attenuation value between precontrast and postcontrast studies of polyps was statistically significant (mean 60 HU, p < 0.01); the same was true for colorectal cancer (mean 81 HU, p < 0.01). The difference between postcontrast density of polyps and cancer with respect to density of solid fecal residuals was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The use of contrast medium could be of help in computed tomographic colonography for discriminating polypoid benign lesions and colorectal cancer from fecal residuals.

State-of-the-art computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging of the gastrointestinal system

Among the major innovations in radiology of the gastrointestinal (GI) system are the replacement of classic invasive diagnostic methods with noninvasive ones and the improvement in lesion characterization and staging of pancreatobiliary malignancies. Developments in imaging technology have led to many improvements in the field of diagnostic GI radiology. With its fast and thin-section scanning abilities, multidetector-row CT (MDCT) strengthens the place of CT as the most efficient tool to diagnose, characterize, and preoperatively stage pancreatic neoplasms. MR cholangiopancreatography has widely replaced endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatobiliary malignancies. MR imaging, using phased-array or endorectal coils, demonstrates local tumor invasion accurately in rectal cancers and thus allows an improved surgical planning. Virtual colonoscopy with MDCTs is an efficient screening method for colon cancer, and MDCT enterography is becoming the standard imaging technique for many small bowel disorders. The continuing developments in CT and MR technology will most probably further improve the accuracy of these and other imaging applications in the near future.

CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy

The objective of this study was to evaluate dietary fecal tagging (FT) as a cleansing method prior to CT colonography (CTC) in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy (CC). After written informed consent was obtained, 24 patients had standard colonoscopic preparation (ScCl), and 25 patients had FT as cleansing method. Segmental distention, fluid levels, fecal residues, tagged appearance of fluid levels, and residual stool were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U test was used to test for significant differences between FT and ScCl groups. Compared with ScCl, FT improved distention (p=0.001), reduced the amount of fluid (p=0.043), but suffered from residual stool (p=0.046). A clear correlation was found between distention and fluid. No differences were found in stool size between FT and ScCl. FT showed a good labeling of fecal residues, and acceptable labeling of fluid levels. Compared with ScCl, FT reduces fluid, favors distention, but suffers from fecal residues. The tagged nature of these residues, however, allows differentiation from polyps.

Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume

The purpose of this feasibility study was to design and test an algorithm for automating mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography (CTC). Five patients with known colorectal masses underwent a pre-surgical contrast-enhanced (120 ml volume 1.6 g iodine/s injection rate, 60 s scan delay) CTC in high spatial resolution (16-slice CT: collimation: 16x0.75 mm, tablefeed: 24 mm/0.5 s, reconstruction increment: 0.5 mm). A CT-density- and volume-based algorithm searched for masses in the colonic wall, which was extracted before by segmenting and dilating the colonic air lumen and subtracting the inner air. A radiologist analyzed the detections and causes of false positives. All masses were detected, and false positives were easy to identify. Combining CT density with volume as a cut-off is a promising approach for automating mass detection that should be further refined and also tested in contrast-enhanced MR colonography. More information under http://www.screening.info.

Phase- and size-adjusted CT cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography

A computed tomography (CT) cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions (polyps/carcinoma) from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography (CTC) relating to the contrast phase and lesion size is determined. CT values of 64 colonic lesions (27 polyps <10 mm, 13 polyps > or =10 mm, 24 carcinomas) were determined by region-of-interest (ROI) measurements in 38 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CTC. In addition, the height (H) of the colonic lesions was measured in CT. CT values were also measured in the aorta (A), superior mesenteric vein (V) and colonic wall. The contrast phase was defined by xA + (1-x)V using x as a weighting factor for describing the different contrast phases ranging from the pure arterial phase (x=1) over the intermediate phases (x=0.9-0.1) to the pure venous phase (x=0). The CT values of the lesions were correlated with their height (H), the different phases (xA+(1-x)V) and the ratio [xA+(I-x)V]/H. The CT cut-off was linearly adjusted to the imaged contrast phase and height of the lesion by the line y=m[xA+(1-x)V]H+y(0). The slope m was determined by linear regression in the correlation (lesion approximately [xA+(i-x)V]/H) and the Y-intercept y(0) by the minimal shift of the line needed to maximize the accuracy of separating the colonic wall from the lesions. The CT value of the lesions correlated best with the intermediate phase: 0.4A + 0.6V (r=0.8 for polyps > or =10 mm, r=0.6 for carcinomas, r=0.4 for polyps <10 mm). The accuracy in the differentiation between lesions and normal colonic wall increased with the height implemented as divisor, reached 91% and was obtained by the dynamic cut-off described by the formula: cut-off (A,V,H)=1.1 [0.4A+0.6V]/H+69.8. The CT value of colonic polyps or carcinomas can be increased extrinsically by scanning in the phase in which 0.4A + 0.6V reaches its maximum. Differentiating lesions from normal colon based on CT values is possible in contrast-enhanced CTC and improves when the cut-off is adjusted (normalized) to the contrast phase and lesion size.

Virtual Colon Dissection with CT Colonography Compared with Axial Interpretation and Conventional Colonoscopy:Preliminary Results

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether a new virtual colon dissection 3D visualization technique for CT colonography has a shorter analysis time and better sensitivity for detection of colonic polyps than interpretation of axial CT images. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. CT colonography was performed in 22 patients using 4-MDCT followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. The CT colonography data sets were analyzed by virtual colon dissection, which virtually bisects and unfolds the colon along its longitudinal axis to inspect the inner colonic surface for polyps. The same CT data sets were independently evaluated using axial interpretation. All data sets were independently interpreted by two radiologists in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

Conventional colonoscopy revealed 31 colonic lesions in 20 patients. Twenty two of the lesions were smaller than 10 mm; nine were 10 mm or larger. Two of the original 22 patients were excluded, one because of residual stool and fluid and the other because of an impassable stenosing rectal wall cancer. For virtual colon dissection, the per-lesion sensitivity was 42% for observer 1 and 68% for observer 2; for axial interpretation, the respective sensitivities were 48% and 61%. For polyps 10 mm or larger, the respective sensitivities were 67% and 89% for virtual colon dissection and 89% and 100% for axial interpretation. The average time for reconstruction and analysis of virtual colon dissection was 36.8 min versus 29.2 min for axial images. Virtual colon dissection was feasible in both the supine and the prone positions in 45.5% of colonic segments, in either the supine or the prone position in 24.5%, and in neither position in 30% of segments.

CONCLUSION

Although virtual colon dissection may facilitate detection of colonic polyps in isolated cases, its detection rate is not superior to axial interpretation, which is mainly attributable to failed rendering of insufficiently distended colonic segments or regions with residual feces. Virtual colon dissection is also the more time-consuming of the two procedures. With further improvement of path-finding and image segmentation, however, virtual colon dissection has the potential to be a useful interpretation tool for CT colonography.

Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography

The purpose was to evaluate supine/left decubitus as an alternative to supine/prone scanning in computed tomographic colonography (CT colonography). Fifty patients were randomised to supine/prone, another 50 to supine/left decubitus scanning. Patients were scanned using a single-slice CT scanner. The colon was divided into eight segments. Comparisons of distension, breathing artefacts, residus and polyp detection were made between the two groups as well as between the different positions. Adequate distension was found in approximately 85, 97 and 95% of segments in the supine, prone and left decubitus positions, respectively. Combined scanning increased the percentage of adequate distension to 98.5% for prone-supine and 97.7% for left decubitus-supine scanning ( P<0.0005 compared to supine, P=0.001 compared to left decubitus and P=0.046 compared to prone scanning). Absence of residual material was found in approximately 62.7, 69.7 and 64% of segments in the supine, prone and left decubitus positions, respectively. Combined scanning increased this percentage to approximately 99% for both groups. No significant differences towards distension or residual material were found between combined supine-prone or supine-left decubitus scanning. In the supine-prone group, combined scanning additionally revealed four lesions and improved conspicuity in two cases of stalked polyps. In the supine-left decubitus group, combined scanning additionally revealed two lesions and improved conspicuity in one stalked polyp. There were significantly fewer breathing artefacts with left decubitus scanning than prone scanning ( P=0.005). A strong positive correlation was found between breathing artefacts and the age of patients in both patient groups. Colonic distension and preparation is improved by using supine and prone or supine and left decubitus scanning in combination, with a subsequent improved polyp detection. There were no significant differences between the two scanning protocols. Prone scanning, however, is hampered by breathing artefacts, especially in the elderly. Therefore, supine-left decubitus scanning is considered a valuable alternative to supine-prone scanning for the elderly.

CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection

In the last decade, computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) colonography, two new cross-sectional techniques for imaging of the colon, emerged. Both techniques show promising initial results in the detection of polyps equal to or greater than 1 cm in diameter in symptomatic patients. Imaging protocols are still mostly under development and prone to change. Both CT and MR colonography generate a large number of source images, which have to be read carefully for filling defects and, if intravenous contrast material is used, enhancing lesions. An important postprocessing technique is multiplanar reformatting, which allows the viewer to see potential lesions in an orientation other than that of the source images. Virtual endoscopy, a volume rendering technique that generates images from within the colon lumen, is used for problem solving. CT and MR colonography have potential advantages over colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema examination: multiplanar capabilities, detection of enhancing lesions that make the distinction between fecal residue and true lesion possible, and ante- and retrograde virtual colonoscopy. Currently, a number of studies suggest that patients have a preference for CT colonography over colonoscopy. Patients consider bowel cleansing the most uncomfortable part of any colon examination; hence, from the acceptance point of view, fecal tagging techniques are promising. Before CT and MR colonography can be implemented in daily practice, they must show approximately the same accuracy as colonoscopy for polyp detection in both symptomatic and screening patients.