Comparison of gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced and diffusion-weighted liver MRI for detection of small hepatic metastases

Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, dual-layer spectral-detector CT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR in detecting neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases

PURPOSE

To explore the optimal of kiloelectron voltage (keV) of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) of dual-layer spectral-detector CT (DLCT) in detecting neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) and to investigate diagnostic performance of polyenergetic images (PEI), DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with suspected NETLM who underwent DLCT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between PEI and VMI at 40-140 keV. Two radiologists read the CT examinations with and without VMI separately in consensus. Two other radiologists read the Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR in consensus. The diagnostic performance was evaluated. Reference standard was histopathology, follow-up, and interpretation of all available imaging.

RESULTS

The highest SNR and CNR were observed at VMI40keV, significantly higher than PEI in the arterial and venous phases (all P<0.01). A total of 477 lesions were identified (396 metastases, 81 benign lesions). Per-lesion AUC was 0.86, 0.91, and 0.97 (PEI, DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR, respectively). Sensitivity of PEI, DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were 0.76, 0.86, and 0.95, respectively. DLCT significantly improved sensitivity compared to PEI. MR had significantly higher sensitivity than DLCT and PEI. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the difference in diagnostic performance was concentrated on lesions < 10 mm.

CONCLUSION

The image quality of VMI40keV is higher than that of PEI. DLCT with VMI40keV provides better diagnostic sensitivity for NETLM detection than PEI. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR yielded the best diagnostic performance for NETLM detection.

Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnostics

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells. NEN are ideally suited for a theragnostic approach due to their specific expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR). SSTR imaging of NEN dates back to the 1980s, but has evolved recently due to the introduction of more sensitive SSTR PET radiotracers. SSTR PET is a primary imaging modality for identifying NEN and characterizing SSTR expression. SSTR PET is complementary to anatomic imaging for assessing tumor response to treatment. SSTR PET is mandated to determine eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Here, the role of imaging to aid management of NEN is reviewed.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma

These guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology liver section. The guideline writing committee included a multidisciplinary team of experts from various specialties involved in the management of CCA, as well as patient/public representatives from AMMF (the Cholangiocarcinoma Charity) and PSC Support. Quality of evidence is presented using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) format. The recommendations arising are to be used as guidance rather than as a strict protocol-based reference, as the management of patients with CCA is often complex and always requires individual patient-centred considerations.

Monitoring and Surveillance of Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing Radioligand Therapy

Radioligand therapy (RLT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is a standard of care for adult patients with somatostatin-receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Taking advantage of this precision nuclear medicine approach requires diligent monitoring and surveillance, from the use of diagnostic SSTR-targeted radioligand imaging for the selection of patients through treatment and assessments of response. Published evidence-based guidelines assist the multidisciplinary healthcare team by providing acceptable approaches to care; however, the sheer heterogeneity of GEP-NETs can make these frameworks difficult to apply in individual clinical circumstances. There are also contradictions in the literature regarding the utility of novel approaches in monitoring and surveilling patients with GEP-NETs receiving RLT. This article discusses the emerging evidence on imaging, clinical biochemistry, and tumor assessment criteria in the management of patients receiving RLT for GEP-NETs; additionally, it documents our own best practices. This allows us to offer practical guidance on how to effectively implement monitoring and surveillance measures to aid patient-tailored clinical decision-making.

Somatostatin Receptor Imaging and Theranostics: Current Practice and Future Prospects

A new era of precision diagnostics and therapy for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms began with the approval of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging followed by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). With the transition from SSTR-based γ-scintigraphy to PET, the higher sensitivity of the latter raised questions regarding the direct application of the planar scintigraphy-based Krenning score for PRRT eligibility. Also, to date, the role of SSTR PET in response assessment and predicting outcome remains under evaluation. In this comprehensive review article, we discuss the current role of SSTR PET in all aspects of neuroendocrine neoplasms, including its relation to conventional imaging, selection of patients for PRRT, and the current understanding of SSTR PET-based response assessment. We also provide a standardized reporting template for SSTR PET with a brief discussion.

Value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and DWI in classification, characterization and confidence in diagnosis of solid focal liver lesions

OBJECTIVE

To assess gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) value in classification (benign vs. malignant) and characterization of solid focal liver lesions (SFLLs) and impact on confidence in diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 195 lesions (46 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs], 45 metastases, 32 adenomas, 37 focal nodular hyperplasias [FNHs] and 35 hemangiomas) were retrospectively evaluated in 93 patients. Three imaging datasets were compared: DWI/ apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (set A), Gd-EOB-DTPA (set B) and combination of both (set C). Two radiologists (R) independently classified (on a five-point ordinal scale) and characterized each lesion. The accuracy in classification and characterization was compared, and the diagnostic confidence was assessed.

RESULTS

The classification accuracy on set A, B and C was 86.2%, 91.3% and 91.8% (R1), and 84.6%, 91.8% and 93.3% (R2); and characterization accuracy was 67.2%, 88.2% and 87.7% (R1), and 60.5%, 88.2% and 85.6% (R2). Classification by reader 1 showed no significant difference between set A and B (p=.09). For both readers, there was a significant difference between set A and C in both classification and characterization (all p < .05), but no significant difference between set B and C in neither classification nor characterization. No significant difference between the three datasets in classification and characterization of hemangiomas (all p > .05). The diagnostic confidence of the readers has increased progressively from set A to Set C (all p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

DWI may suggest benignity or malignancy of solid liver lesions, while Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced imaging remains superior in lesions characterization and the combination of both increases the diagnostic confidence. DWI is very helpful in the diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas.

Quantification of liver function using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents, most notably gadoxetic acid (GA), has expanded the role of MRI, allowing not only a morphologic but also a functional evaluation of the hepatobiliary system. The mechanism of uptake and excretion of gadoxetic acid via transporters, such as organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP1,3), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) and MRP3, has been elucidated in the literature. Furthermore, GA uptake can be estimated on either static images or on dynamic imaging, for example, the hepatic extraction fraction (HEF) and liver perfusion. GA-enhanced MRI has achieved an important role in evaluating morphology and function in chronic liver diseases (CLD), allowing to distinguish between the two subgroups of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD), simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and help to stage fibrosis and cirrhosis, predict liver transplant graft survival, and preoperatively evaluate the risk of liver failure if major resection is planned. Finally, because of its noninvasive nature, GA-enhanced MRI can be used for long-term follow-up and post-treatment monitoring. This review article aims to describe the current role of GA-enhanced MRI in quantifying liver function in a variety of hepatobiliary disorders.

Re-evaluation of the Couinaud classification for segmental anatomy of the right liver, with particular attention to the relevance of cranio-caudal boundaries

BACKGROUND

Although the Couinaud classification of liver segments has been challenged by several studies, whether the cranio-caudal boundaries can be delineated in the right liver has not yet been assessed. This study scrutinized the third-order branching pattern of the portal vein in the right liver with attention to the validity of cranio-caudal segmentation.

METHODS

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the portal vein and hepatic vein, using non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 50 healthy participants.

RESULTS

In the right paramedian sector, the portal vein ramified into 2 thick P8s (P8vent and P8dor) in all the participants. Additional thick P8s that ran laterally and/or medially (P8lat and/or P8med) were observed in 18 (32%) participants. In contrast, multiple thin P5s, ranging in number from 2 to 6 (median, 4), branched from the right paramedian trunk, the right portal trunk, and/or even from P8s. In the right lateral sector, an arch-like type in which multiple P6s ramified from a single thick P7 was observed in 26 (52%) participants. A bifurcation type composed of a single P7 and a single P6 was observed in 23 (46%) participants, and a trifurcation type was observed in 1 participant.

CONCLUSION

No clear cranio-caudal intersegmental plane could be delineated in the right liver in most of the participants. The resection of a whole Couinaud segment in the right liver should not be regarded as a systematic, anatomic resection from an oncologic viewpoint. In contrast, detailed information on the third-order portal vein ramification pattern is likely to be helpful when performing smaller anatomic resections.

Performance Analysis of Various Nanocontrast Agents and CAD Systems for Cancer Diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a disease which involves the abnormal cell growth that has the potential of dispersal to other parts of the body. Among various conventional anatomical imaging techniques for cancer diagnosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides the best spatial resolution and is noninvasive. Current efforts are directed at enhancing the capabilities of MRI in oncology by adding contrast agents.

DISCUSSION

Recently, the superior properties of nanomaterials (extremely smaller in size, good biocompatibility and ease in chemical modification) allow its application as a contrast agent for early and specific cancer detection through the MRI. The precise detection of cancer region from any imaging modality will lead to a thriving treatment for cancer patients. The better localization of radiation dose can be attained from MRI by using suitable image processing algorithms. As there are many works that have been proposed for automatic detection for cancers, the effort is also put in to provide an effective survey of Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) system for different types of cancer detection with increased efficiency based on recent research works. Even though there are many surveys on MRI contrast agents, they only focused on a particular type of cancer. This study deeply presents the use of nanocontrast agents in MRI for different types of cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The main aim of this paper is to critically review the available compounds used as nanocontrast agents in MRI modality for different types of cancers. It also includes the review of different methods for cancer cell detection and classification. A comparative analysis is performed to analyze the effect of different CAD systems.

GdVO4:Eu3+,Bi3+ Nanoparticles as a Contrast Agent for MRI and Luminescence Bioimaging

With the development of multifunctional imaging, gadolinium (Gd)-bearing inorganic nanoparticles (NPs), which were doped with trivalent lanthanide (Ln3+), have been applied in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and optical imaging owing to their high payload of Gd3+ ions and specific optical characteristics. In this study, we chose GdVO4 codoped with Eu3+ and Bi3+ as the host material to generate a highly efficient contrast agent (CA) for MRI and long-term luminescence imaging. The new CA emits strong and stable luminescence because of its strong characteristic emissions, resulting from the energy-transfer process from the vanadate groups (VO4 3-) to the Eu3+ and Bi3+ dopants. Additionally, these NPs provided conspicuous T 1 and T 2 relaxation time-shortening characteristics, which result in MRI enhancement. GdVO4:Eu3+,Bi3+ NPs were tested on liver tumor-bearing nude mice, and showed improved liver tumor contrast in T 2-weighted MR images (T 2WI). The dual-modal imaging probe exhibited no cytotoxicity or organ toxicity, reflecting its excellent biocompatibility. Thus, GdVO4:Eu3+,Bi3+ has the potential to be used for bioassays in vitro and liver tumor targeting in vivo. The results reveal the great promise of using the designed GdVO4:Eu3+,Bi3+ NPs as luminescent and MRI dual-mode bioprobes for clinical bioimaging applications.

Utility of ultrasound-guided liver tumor biopsy for next-generation sequencing-based clinical sequencing

AIM

Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies allow for evaluation of genetic alterations in various cancer-related genes in daily clinical practice. Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue is often used for NGS-based clinical sequencing assays; however, the success rate of NGS assays using archival FFPE tumor tissue is reported to be lower than that using fresh tumor tissue. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided liver tumor biopsy for NGS-based multiplex gene assays.

METHODS

We compared the success rate of NGS assays between archival FFPE tumor tissues and US-guided liver tumor biopsy tissues, and summarized the treatment progress of the patients.

RESULTS

Next-generation sequencing assays using US-guided liver biopsy samples were successful in all patients (22/22), whereas the success rate with archival FFPE tumor tissue was 84.8% (151/178, P < 0.05). At least one potentially actionable genetic alteration was identified from the US-guided liver biopsy samples in 20 of 22 patients. Among the 18 patients with actionable genetic alterations targetable with drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, eight initiated mutation-driven targeted therapies. Of these eight patients, four achieved partial response or stable disease for at least 4 months, and three were not assessable for response due to short exposure. There were no biopsy-related complications requiring additional treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that US-guided liver tumor biopsy is a useful and safe method for obtaining high-quality samples for NGS-based clinical sequencing. In cases with metastatic liver tumors, US-guided biopsy should be considered to provide accurate and optimal sequencing results for patients.

Non-contrast liver MRI as an alternative to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides reliable diagnostic performance for detecting liver metastasis but is costly and time-consuming.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of non-contrast liver MRI to whole MRI using gadoxetic acid for detecting liver metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included 175 patients with histologically confirmed 401 liver metastases and 73 benign liver lesions. A non-contrast MRI (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted images) with or without multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and a whole MRI (gadoxetic acid-enhanced and non-contrast MRI) were analyzed independently by two observers to detect liver metastasis using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in Az value (range = 0.914-0.997), sensitivity (range = 95.2-99.6%), specificity (range = 77.3-100%), or positive (range = 92.9-100%) or negative predictive value (range = 87.5-95.7%) between the non-contrast MRI with or without MDCT and the whole MRI for both observers for all lesions as well as lesions ≤1.0 cm and lesions >1.0 cm in size ( P = 0.203-1.000). Combined MDCT and non-contrast MRI led to similar numbers of false-positive diagnosis to the whole MRI (eight for Observers 1 and 4 vs. 3 for Observer 2).

CONCLUSION

Non-contrast liver MRI may serve as an alternative to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting and characterizing liver metastasis from CRC, at least in patients with relatively high risk of liver metastasis who underwent MDCT. Non-contrast liver MRI could be beneficial especially for patients with lesions that are already documented as benign but require additional follow-up MRIs.

PET/MR Imaging of the Pancreas

PET/MR imaging has the potential to markedly alter pancreatic care in both the malignant, and premalignant states with the ability to perform robust, high-resolution, quantitative molecular imaging. The ability of PET/MR imaging to monitor disease processes, potentially correct for motion in the upper abdomen, and provide novel biomarkers that may be a combination of MR imaging and PET biomarkers, offers a unique, precise interrogation of the pancreatic milieu going forward.

Computed Diffusion Weighted Imaging of the Liver Using Extrapolation Technique in Patients Who Underwent Liver Transplantation With Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Initial Experience and Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and image quality of computed diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients who underwent liver transplantation with HCC were enrolled. Computed DWI was synthesized for b-values of 800 (cDWI800) and 1200 s/mm (cDWI1200) using directly acquired DWI with b-values of 0, 50, and 500 s/mm. Signal intensity of HCC, background liver, and contrast-to-noise ratio were evaluated for directly acquired DWI of 800 s/mm (dDWI800), cDWI800, and cDWI1200. Two radiologists evaluated the image quality for contrast between HCC and liver, suppression of background signal and T2 shine-through, and overall image quality.

RESULTS

cDWI1200 showed the lowest contrast-to-noise ratio. Qualitative scores for background suppression and decreased T2 shine-through were highest for cDWI1200. However, contrast between HCC and background liver was worst in cDWI1200.

CONCLUSIONS

In computed DWI of high b-values, contrast between HCC and background liver was very low.

[Importance of diffusion imaging in liver metastases]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Due to its excellent soft tissue contrast, the availability of liver-specific contrast agents and the possibility of functional imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the method of choice for the evaluation of focal liver lesions.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) enables generation of functional information about the microstructure of a tissue besides morphological information.

PERFORMANCE

In the detection of focal liver lesions DWI shows a better detection rate compared to T2w sequences and a slightly poorer detection rate compared to dynamic T1w sequences. In principle, using DWI it is possible to distinguish malignant from benign liver lesions and also to detect a therapy response at an early stage.

ACHIEVEMENTS

For both detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, DWI represents a promising alternative to the morphological sequences; however, a more detailed characterization with the use of further sequences should be carried out particularly for the characterization of solid benign lesions. For the assessment and prognosis of therapy response, DWI offers advantages compared to morphological sequences.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

For the detection of focal liver lesions DWI is in principle sufficient. After visual detection of a solid liver lesion a more detailed characterization should be carried out using further sequences (in particular dynamic T1w sequences). The DWI procedure should be used for the assessment and prognosis of a therapy response.

Detection of liver metastases in cancer patients with geographic fatty infiltration of the liver: the added value of contrast-enhanced sonography

Purpose

The aim of this study is to assess the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the detection of liver metastases in cancer patients with geographic liver fatty deposition on greyscale ultrasonography (US).

Methods

Thirty-seven consecutive cancer patients (24 women and 13 men; age, 33 to 80 years; mean, 58.1 years) with geographic liver fatty deposition, but without any detectable focal liver lesion on greyscale US, underwent sulphur hexafluoride-enhanced US. Two readers reported by consensus the presence, size, and location of any detected lesion. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a confirmatory study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and accuracy were calculated.

Results

Seven focal liver lesions (size, 4 to 10 mm; mean, 6.1 mm) were detected in 4/37 patients (10.8%): four metastases (size, 5 to 10 mm; mean, 6.7 mm) were detected both by CEUS and MRI, with one hemangioma and two cysts (size range, 4 to 6 mm; mean, 5.3 mm) detected by MRI only. In 1/37 patients (2.7%), CEUS misdiagnosed geographic fatty change as three metastases. In 32/37 patients (86.5%), no lesions were detected. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of CEUS were 100% (95% confidence Interval [CI], 1.000 to 1.000), 97.1% (95% CI, 0.914 to 1.027), 75%, 100%, and 97.3%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between CEUS and MRI in the detection of focal liver lesions (P=0.480), whereas both of them performed better than baseline US (P<0.001).

Conclusion

CEUS improves the detection of liver metastases in cancer patients with geographic liver fatty deposition on greyscale US.

Focal Liver Lesions Classification and Characterization: What Value Do DWI and ADC Have?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to analyze the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the classification/characterization of focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

Retrospective study, approved by ethical board, of 100 proven FLLs (20 hemangiomas, 20 focal nodular hyperplasia, 20 dysplastic nodules, 20 hepatocellular carcinomas, and 20 metastases) was performed by 1.5-T MR. For each lesion, 2 readers, blinded of medical history, have evaluated 6 sets of images: set A (T1/T2-weighted images), set B (set A + DWI), set C (set B + apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] map), set D (set A + dynamic and hepatobiliary phases), set E (set D + DWI), set F (set E + ADC map).

RESULTS

In unenhanced images, the evaluation of the ADC improves the accuracy in classification/characterization (+9%/14%, respectively), whereas in enhanced images the accuracy was increased by DWI (+7%/12%, respectively) and ADC (+13%/19%, respectively). Diffusion-weighted imaging does not improve classification/characterization of hemangiomas, may be useful in focal nodular hyperplasia/dysplastic nodules vs metastases/hepatocellular carcinoma differentiation, and increases the classification/characterization of metastases in both unenhanced and enhanced images.

CONCLUSIONS

Diffusion-weighted imaging may improve classification/characterization of FLLs at unenhanced/enhanced examinations.

Standard-b-Value Versus Low-b-Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Hepatic Lesion Discrimination: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the comparative diagnostic performance of standard-b-value (500-1000s/mm) versus low-b-value (≤500 s/mm) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the discrimination of hepatic lesions.

METHODS

A total of 1775 hepatic malignant lesions and 1120 benign hepatic lesions from 21 studies were included.

RESULTS

(1) The global sensitivity was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.847-0.879), the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.797-0.842), the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 6.234 (95% CI, 4.260-9.123), the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.175 (95% CI, 0.135-0.227), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 42.836 (95% CI, 24.134-76.031). The area under the curve (AUC) and Q* index were 0.93 and 0.87. Publication bias was not present (P > 0.05). (2)The sensitivity of a subgroup meta-analysis of standard-b-value DWI was 0.858 (95% CI, 0.835-0.880), the specificity was 0.836 (95% CI, 0.807-0.863), the PLR was 6.527 (95% CI, 3.857-11.046), the NLR was 0.168 (95% CI, 0.123-0.239), and the DOR was 49.716 (95% CI, 22.897-107.98). The AUC and Q* index were 0.941 and 0.88. (3)The sensitivity of a subgroup meta-analysis of low-b-value DWI was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89), the specificity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), the PLR was 6.22 (95% CI, 3.29-11.76), the NLR was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.12-0.29), and the DOR was 37.14 (95% CI, 14.80-93.18). The AUC and Q* index were 0.922 and 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic DWI is useful in differentiating between malignant and benign hepatic lesions. Standard-b-value DWI displayed an overall superior diagnostic accuracy over low-b-value DWI. Further trials needed to determine whether increasing b values beyond 1000 s/mm affects the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic lesion discrimination.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: Current applications

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver can be performed using most commercially available machines and is currently accepted in routine sequence. This sequence has some potential as an imaging biomarker for fibrosis, tumor detection/characterization, and following/predicting therapy. To improve reliability including accuracy and reproducibility, researchers have validated this new technique in terms of image acquisition, data sampling, and analysis. The added value of DWI in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was established in the detection of malignant liver lesions. However, some limitations remain in terms of lesion characterization and fibrosis detection. Furthermore, the methodologies of image acquisition and data analysis have been inconsistent. Therefore, researchers should make every effort to not only improve accuracy and reproducibility but also standardize imaging parameters.

FIRST BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON MULTIMODAL TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES. MODULE 1: PRE-TREATMENT EVALUATION

Background

: Liver metastases of colorectal cancer are frequent and potentially fatal event in the evolution of patients with these tumors.

Aim

: In this module, was contextualized the clinical situations and parameterized epidemiological data and results of the various treatment modalities established.

Method:

Was realized deep discussion on detecting and staging metastatic colorectal cancer, as well as employment of imaging methods in the evaluation of response to instituted systemic therapy.

Results

: The next step was based on the definition of which patients would have their metastases considered resectable and how to expand the amount of patients elegible for modalities with curative intent.

Conclusion

: Were presented clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, validated to be taken into account in clinical practice.

Current evidence for the diagnostic value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for liver metastasis

A variety of imaging techniques, including ultrasonography (US), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography combined with CT scan (PET/CT), are available for diagnosis and treatment planning in liver metastasis. Contrast-enhanced MDCT is a relatively non-invasive, widely available and standardized method for hepatic work-up. Gadoxetic acid (gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid; EOB Primovist®]) is a recently developed liver-specific hepatobiliary MR contrast agent that offers both dynamic imaging as well as liver-specific static hepatocyte imaging, referred to as the hepatobiliary phase. Following contrast injection, this technique reveals dynamic vascular phases (arterial, portal venous and delayed phases), in addition to the hepatobiliary phase upon uptake by functional hepatocytes. The overall sensitivity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was significantly higher than that of contrast-enhanced CT. Specifically, the higher sensitivity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was observed in lesions smaller than 1 cm in diameter. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is considered an extremely useful tool for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Future studies will focus on diagnostic algorithms involving combinations of modalities such as MRI, MDCT and/or (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, which may impact the treatment plan for these patients.

Feasibility of Routine Application of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Combination with Diffusion-Weighted MRI for the Preoperative Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination with diffusion-weighted MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI) has become popular for evaluating colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This retrospective observational study aimed to determine whether this procedure should be indicated prior to hepatectomy in all patients with CRLM.

METHODS

A retrospective survey of relevant data of patients who had undergone hepatectomy for CRLM from 2008 to 2014 was performed. The rates of detection by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI were evaluated. In addition, relapse-free and overall survivals after primary hepatectomy were compared between patients who had undergone only CE-CT versus those who had undergone both CE-CT and Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI.

RESULTS

In all, 419 pathologically confirmed CRLM were resected in 202 hepatectomies in 177 patients. The sensitivity of detection of CRLM was 77 % for CE-CT and 93 % for Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI (P < 0.01). The sensitivity of detection of 1-5, 6-10, and 11-15 mm CRLM by CE-CT was 9.6 % (5/52), 47 % (26/55), and 76 % (57/75), respectively, whereas that by Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI was 54 % (28/52), 91 % (50/55), and 99 % (74/75), respectively; these differences are significant (P < 0.01 for all three groups). Relapse-free (P = 0.99) and overall survival (P = 0.79) did not differ significantly between 37 patients evaluated preoperatively by only CE-CT and 168 patients evaluated by both CE-CT and Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI.

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI detects small CRLM (≤15 mm) with higher sensitivity than CE-CT. However, whether Gd-EOB-MRI/DWI should be a routine component of preoperative evaluation remains unclear in terms of survival benefit.

The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: A comparison with unenhanced and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

To compare the role of DWI vs. gadoxetic-acid-disodium enhanced MRI in the detection of colorectal hepatic metastases.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with 115 hepatic metastases were included in this retrospective study, approved by the Ethical Board. All patients underwent intraoperative-ultrasound and surgical resection within two weeks after MRI. Images were grouped in 4 sets, which were analyzed by two radiologists in different sessions: unenhanced T1-T2w (set A), set A plus DWI (set B), set A plus gadoxetic-acid-disodium (set C), set A plus DWI plus gadoxetic-acid-disodium (set D). For each set, metastases presence/size/site was reported. Interobserver agreement and statistical significance were assessed by Cohen's kappa and Mc-Nemar's test, respectively.

RESULTS

Readers' agreement was always very good (k>0.80). Mean sensitivity values were 84.3/92.1/95.6/97.3% for set A/B/C/D, respectively. Mean specificity, positive predicted, negative predicted, and accuracy values strongly and progressively increased in the various set too: from 62.5% (set A) to 85.0% as for specificity, from 92.8% to 97.3% as for positive predicted value, from 41.0% to 85.1% as for negative predicted value, and from 81.1% to 95.5% as for accuracy. For each reader from set A to D, the number of false negatives progressively decreases.

CONCLUSIONS

For both readers, DWI improved all statistical parameters in the unenhanced examinations, as for nodules either smaller or greater than 1cm, while in the EOB-enhanced examinations DWI prevalently increased specificity/negative predictive value.

The efficacy of diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficients mapping for liver metastasis of colonic adenocarcinomas

Objectives:

To establish retrospectively the relation between the histopathologic grade of colorectal liver metastasis and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of hepatic metastases of colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Methods:

The diagnoses of liver metastases were confirmed with biopsy, surgery, and follow-up imaging findings. Twenty-six patients with 94 liver metastasis were included in the study. Of 94 masses, 59 were poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 18 were moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma, and 17 were well-differentiated regarding the diameters, ADC values, and ratio index (RI) values. Kolmogorov-smirnov normality test, Kruskal-wallis analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction, Spearman correlation analysis, and receiver operating characteristics curve methods were applied to evaluate the statistical relations.

Results:

There was a statistically significant difference in terms of ADC values and RI between poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma and moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma plus well-differentiated adenocarcinomas. Poorly-differentiated adenocarcinomas have the lowest ADC values and highest RI values among other groups.

Conclusion:

Use of ADC values alone can be executed for the diagnosis of focal hepatic masses and also can aid in the differentiation of benign and malignant hepatic lesions.

A meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases

OBJECTIVES

To obtain the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) and gadoxetic-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of liver metastases.

METHODS

A comprehensive search (EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane) was performed to identify relevant articles up to June 2015. Inclusion criteria were: liver metastases, DW-MR imaging and/or gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and per-lesion statistics. The reference standard was histopathology, intraoperative observation and/or follow-up. Sources of bias were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A linear mixed-effect regression model was used to obtain sensitivity estimates.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles were included (1,989 patients, 3,854 metastases). Sensitivity estimates for DW-MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combined sequence for detecting liver metastases on a per-lesion basis was 87.1 %, 90.6 % and 95.5 %, respectively. Sensitivity estimates by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combined sequence were significantly better than DW-MR imaging (p = 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively), and the combined MR sequence was significantly more sensitive than gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed in articles that compared the three techniques simultaneously, with only colorectal liver metastases and in liver metastases smaller than 1 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with liver metastases, combined DW-MR and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging has the highest sensitivity for detecting liver metastases on a per-lesion basis.

KEY POINTS

• DW-MRI is less sensitive than gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting liver metastases • DW-MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is the best combination • Same results are observed in colorectal liver metastases • Same results are observed in liver metastases smaller than 1 cm • Same results are observed when histopathology alone is the reference standard.

Technical advancements and protocol optimization of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in liver

An area of rapid advancement in abdominal MRI is diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). By measuring diffusion properties of water molecules, DWI is capable of non-invasively probing tissue properties and physiology at cellular and macromolecular level. The integration of DWI as part of abdominal MRI exam allows better lesion characterization and therefore more accurate initial diagnosis and treatment monitoring. One of the most technical challenging, but also most useful abdominal DWI applications is in liver and therefore requires special attention and careful optimization. In this article, the latest technical developments of DWI and its liver applications are reviewed with the explanations of the technical principles, recommendations of the imaging parameters, and examples of clinical applications. More advanced DWI techniques, including Intra-Voxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) diffusion imaging, anomalous diffusion imaging, and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) are discussed.

A comparative study of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters for the characterization of common solid hepatic tumors

BACKGROUND

The performance of diffusion-weighted imaging parameters for characterizing hepatic tumors is controversial.

PURPOSE

To compare the performances of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters, including the pure diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f), in the characterization of common solid hepatic tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers and 43 patients underwent free-breath diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of the liver using eight b values (10-800 s/mm(2)). Twelve regions of interest (ROIs) of normal liver tissue in healthy volunteers and 49 hepatic lesions (23 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs], 16 hemangiomas, and 10 metastases) were measured. Conventional ADC(0,500) and ADCtotal obtained by the mono-exponential model, as well as D, D*, and f were calculated. Student t-tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

ADC(0,500), ADCtotal, and D were significantly lower in the malignant group ([1.48 ± 0.35] × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; [1.35 ± 0.30] × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; [1.18 ± 0.33] × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) compared to the hemangioma group ([2.74 ± 1.03] × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; [2.61 ± 0.81] × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; [1.97 ± 0.79] × 10(-3) mm(2)/s]. D* did not differ among multiple comparisons. For the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC), the maximum value was attained with ADCtotal (0.983) and was closely followed by ADC(0,500) (0.967), with lower values obtained for D (0.837), f (0.649), and D* (0.599). Statistically significant differences were found between the AUC-ROC of both ADCs (ADCtotal and ADC(0,500)) and D. There was no statistically significant difference between the AUC-ROC of ADCtotal and ADC(0,500).

CONCLUSION

ADCs showed superior diagnostic performance compared to IVIM-derived parameters in detecting differences between the malignant group and hemangioma group.

Morphologic and Functional Imaging of Non-Colorectal Liver Metastases

Liver metastases are the most frequent malignant liver lesions. Besides colorectal carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, breast cancer, lung cancer, and neuroendocrine tumors are the most common entities that metastasize to the liver. The morphology of these metastases depends on the primary tumor. For morphologic and functional imaging of non-colorectal liver metastases, multiple imaging techniques such as ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography coupled with CT or MRI are available. This review summarizes morphologic and functional characteristics of different non-colorectal liver metastases.

Systemic treatment in breast cancer: a primer for radiologists

Abstract

Cytotoxic chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and molecular targeted therapy are the three major classes of drugs used to treat breast cancer. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and bone scintigraphy each have a distinct role in monitoring response and detecting drug toxicities associated with these treatments. The purpose of this article is to elucidate the various systemic therapies used in breast cancer, with an emphasis on the role of imaging in assessing treatment response and detecting treatment-related toxicities.

Teaching Points

• Cytotoxic chemotherapy is often used in combination with HER2-targeted and endocrine therapies.

• Endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies are recommended in hormone-receptor- and HER2-positive cases.

• CT is the workhorse for assessment of treatment response in breast cancer metastases.

• Alternate treatment response criteria can help in interpreting pseudoprogression in metastasis.

• Unique toxicities are associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and with endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of pancreatic cancer

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a reliable and accurate imaging method for the evaluation of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a relatively recent technological improvement that expanded MRI capabilities, having brought functional aspects into conventional morphologic MRI evaluation. DWI can depict the random diffusion of water molecules within tissues (the so-called Brownian motions). Modifications of water diffusion induced by different factors acting on the extracellular and intracellular spaces, as increased cell density, edema, fibrosis, or altered functionality of cell membranes, can be detected using this MR sequence. The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model is an advanced DWI technique that consent a separate quantitative evaluation of all the microscopic random motions that contribute to DWI, which are essentially represented by molecular diffusion and blood microcirculation (perfusion). Technological improvements have made possible the routine use of DWI during abdominal MRI study. Several authors have reported that the addition of DWI sequence can be of value for the evaluation of patients with PDAC, especially improving the staging; nevertheless, it is still unclear whether and how DWI could be helpful for identification, characterization, prognostic stratification and follow-up during treatment. The aim of this paper is to review up-to-date literature data regarding the applications of DWI and IVIM to PDACs.

Focal liver lesions detection: Comparison of respiratory-triggering, triggering and tracking navigator and tracking-only navigator in diffusion-weighted imaging

PURPOSE

To compare low b value (10s/mm(2)) spin-echo echo-planar (SE-EP) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquired with respiratory-triggering (RT), triggering and tracking navigator (TT), tracking only navigator (TRON) techniques for image quality and focal liver lesions (FLL) detection in non-cirrhotic patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This bi-centric study was approved by the institutional review boards; informed consent was obtained. Eighty-three patients were prospectively included and SE-EP-DWI with RT, TT and TRON techniques were performed. DWI sequences were randomized and independently analyzed by two readers. The qualitative evaluation was based on a 3-point score for axial artifacts (motion, ghost, susceptibility artifacts and distortion) and stair-step artifacts. Sensitivity of FLL detection was calculated for all lesions together and after lesion size stratification (≤ 10 mm, >10-20mm and >20mm). The standard of reference consisted of a retrospective reading of the conventional MRI, the three DWI sequences and by follow-up (12 months): a total of 409 FLL were detected. Data between sequences was compared with non-parametric tests. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used for inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

Image quality was comparable for RT and TT. TRON showed statistically significantly more axial artifacts for the two readers (p<0.05). Stair-step artifacts were not statistically significantly different between DWI sequences. Overall sensitivities for RT, TT, TRON were 85%, 86%, 82% and 86%, 89% 83%, respectively, for readers 1 and 2. The inter-observer agreement was very good.

CONCLUSION

Image quality was better for RT and TT compared to TRON. Overall sensitivities for FLL detection were comparable between techniques and readers.

Qualitative and quantitative image analysis of CT and MR imaging in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases in comparison to (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET

PURPOSE

To compare lesion conspicuity in patients with liver metastases arising from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) using MRI, PET and CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

16 patients with GEP-NETs were evaluated using non-contrast MRI, contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI using Gd-EOB-DTPA and CE-(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET. Quantitative analyses were performed by two blinded readers using ROI-analyses quantifying contrast ratios (CR) between normal liver-tissue and GEP-NET-metastases. Qualitative analyses were performed evaluating primary visibility and spatial detectability of all lesions.

RESULTS

103 of the same liver metastases were detected on all modalities. Qualitatively, lesion conspicuity was superior on CE-MRI imaging compared to non-contrast MR-sequences (T2, DWI, fl2D, fl3D), as well as arterial- and portal-venous phase CT. Concerning detectability of lesions, CE-MRI was superior to all other modalities. The quantitative ROI-analysis demonstrated improved CR for DWI compared to all other non-contrast MR-sequences (p<0.001). CE-MRI presented with higher CR-values compared to CE-(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic imaging using non contrast MRI with fl2D-and fl3D-sequences in combination with the molecular imaging modality (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET is optimal for the assessment of liver lesions in GEP-NET-patients. Even though CE-MRI was superior to non-contrast MRI, non-contrast MRI is sufficient to detect and quantify liver metastases in daily routine, especially in combination with DW-Imaging.

The impact of hepatocyte phase imaging from infancy to young adulthood in patients with a known or suspected liver lesion

OBJECTIVE

Hepatocyte-specific contrast agents are used to help characterize liver lesions. However, there are no studies evaluating the utility of these agents in detecting or diagnosing pediatric liver lesions. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the hepatocyte phase of imaging on lesion detection, tumor staging and diagnostic confidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing an MRI between September 2010 and August 2012 using gadoxetate disodium as the contrast agent were included in this study. Each exam was duplicated so that one copy contained all sequences, including the hepatocyte phase of imaging, and the other copy contained all sequences except the hepatocyte phase of imaging. One reviewer evaluated all exams in a blinded, random fashion. Data tracked included imaging diagnosis, confidence in diagnosis, number of lesions and PRETEXT grade. The imaging diagnosis was compared to histopathology, when available. Data were analyzed for the study population as well as the subset of patients diagnosed with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH).

RESULTS

There were 112 patients (56 male; mean age: 9.25 years) included in this study. A total of 33 patients had a malignant tumor and the remainder had either a benign lesion or no lesion. The addition of the hepatocyte phase of imaging significantly improved the diagnostic confidence for all patients (P < 0.0001) as well as specifically for patients diagnosed with FNH (P = 0.003). In nearly a quarter of patients, the hepatocyte phase of imaging allowed the reviewer to detect additional lesions (P = 0.005). In the patients with a malignant tumor, the addition of the hepatocyte phase of imaging changed the PRETEXT grade in 7/30 patients although the results were not significant (P = 0.161).

CONCLUSION

The addition of the hepatocyte phase of imaging helps to improve lesion detection and increase the diagnostic confidence for all liver tumors, as well as for FNH in particular.

Added value of arterial enhancement fraction color maps for the characterization of small hepatic low-attenuating lesions in patients with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the added value of arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) color maps for the differentiation of small metastases from hepatic benign lesions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent multiphasic liver CT imaging and had low-attenuating liver lesions smaller than 3 cm (123 total lesions; metastasis: benign = 32:91). AEF color maps of the liver were created from multiphasic liver CT images using dedicated software. Two radiologists independently reviewed multiphasic CT image sets alone and in combination with image sets with AEF color maps using a five-point scale. The additional diagnostic value of the color maps was assessed by means of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve (Az) increased when multiphasic CT images were combined with AEF color map analysis as compared with evaluation based only on multiphasic CT images (from 0.698 to 0.897 for reader 1, and from 0.825 to 0.945 for reader 2; P < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). The increase Az was especially significant for lesions less than 1 cm (from 0.702 to 0.888 for reader 1, and from 0.768 to 0.958 for reader 2; P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). The mean AEF of tumor-adjacent parenchyma (35.07 ± 27.2) was significantly higher than that of tumor-free liver parenchyma (27.3 ± 20.6) (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

AEF color mapping can improve the diagnostic performance for small hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer and may allow for the elimination of additional examinations.

The ins and outs of liver imaging

Different imaging modalities including ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and MR imaging may be used in the liver depending on the clinical situation. The ability of dedicated contrast-enhanced liver MR imaging or CT to definitively characterize lesions as benign is crucial in avoiding unnecessary biopsy. Liver imaging surveillance in patients with cirrhosis may allow for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at an earlier stage, and therefore may improve outcome. This article reviews the different imaging modalities used to evaluate the liver and focal benign and malignant hepatic lesions, and the basic surveillance strategy for patients at increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Differential diagnosis between hepatic metastases and benign focal lesions using DWI with parallel acquisition technique: a meta-analysis

We aim to investigate the diagnostic capability of diffusion-weighted imaging using parallel acquisition technique for the differentiation between hepatic metastases and benign focal lesions with a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included a total of 858 hepatic metastases and 440 benign liver lesions from nine studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.93), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 8.50 (95% CI, 4.97-14.52) and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.11-0.26), respectively. The P value for χ (2) heterogeneity for all pooled estimates was <0.05. From the fitted summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC), the area under the curve (AUC) and Q* index were 0.95 and 0.88, respectively. Publication bias is not present (t = -0.76, P = 0.471). The meta-regression analysis indicated that evaluated covariates included patient number, patient population, mean age, maximum of b factor, number of cysts, number of hemangiomas, and field were not sources of heterogeneity (all P value >0.05). Diffusion-weighted imaging was useful for differentiation between hepatic metastases and benign focal lesions. The diffusion characteristics of the benign hepatocellular lesions, including cases of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and adenoma, have rarely been reported and need further studies. The diagnostic capability of DWI with parallel acquisition technique for differentiation between metastases and benign hepatic focal lesions might be overestimated.

Incremental value of liver MR imaging in patients with potentially curable colorectal hepatic metastasis detected at CT: a prospective comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and a combination of both MR techniques

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, both techniques combined (combined MR imaging), and computed tomography (CT) for detecting colorectal hepatic metastases and evaluate incremental value of MR for patients with potentially curable colorectal hepatic metastases detected with CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, with informed consent, 51 patients (39 men, 12 women; mean age, 62 years) with potentially resectable hepatic metastases detected with CT underwent liver MR, including DW imaging and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR. Two independent readers reviewed DW, gadoxetic acid-enhanced, combined MR, and CT image sets to detect hepatic metastases. The figure-of-merit (FOM) value representing overall diagnostic performance, sensitivity, and positive predictive value (PPV) for each image set were analyzed by using free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis and generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

There were 104 hepatic metastases in 47 patients. The pooled FOM values, sensitivities, and PPVs of combined MR (FOM value, 0.93; sensitivity, 98%; and PPV, 88%) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR (FOM value, 0.92; sensitivity, 95%; and PPV, 90%) were significantly higher than those of CT (FOM value, 0.82; sensitivity, 85%; and PPV, 73%) (P < .006). The pooled FOM value and sensitivity of combined MR (FOM value, 0.92; sensitivity, 95%) was also significantly higher than that of DW imaging (FOM value, 0.82; sensitivity, 79%) for metastases (≤1-cm diameter) (P ≤ .003). DW imaging showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (79%) and PPV (60%) than CT (sensitivity, 50%; PPV, 33%) for the metastases (≤1-cm diameter) (P ≤ .004). In 47 patients with hepatic metastases, combined MR depicted more metastases than CT in 10 and 14 patients, respectively, according to both readers.

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR and combined MR are more accurate than CT in detecting colorectal hepatic metastases, have an incremental value when added to CT alone for detecting additional metastases, and can be routinely performed in patients with potentially curable hepatic metastases detected with CT.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: techniques and applications

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a technique that assesses the cellularity, tortuosity of the extracellular/extravascular space, and cell membrane density based on differences in water proton mobility in tissues. The strength of the diffusion weighting is reflected by the b value. DWI using several b values enables the quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient. DWI is increasingly used in liver imaging for multiple reasons: it can add useful qualitative and quantitative information to conventional imaging sequences; it is acquired relatively quickly; it is easily incorporated into existing clinical protocols; and it is a noncontrast technique.

Focal liver lesions detection and characterization: The advantages of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI

Since its clinical introduction, several studies in literature have investigated gadolinium ethoxybenzhyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid or gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) properties. Following contrast injection, it provides dynamic vascular phases (arterial, portal and equilibrium phases) and hepatobiliary phase, the latter due to its uptake by functional hepatocytes. The main advantages of Gd-EOB-DTPA of focal liver lesion detection and characterization are discussed in this paper. Namely, we focus on the possibility of distinguishing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatic adenoma (HA), the identification of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the pre-operative assessment of metastasis in liver parenchyma. Regarding the differentiation between FNH and HA, adenoma typically appears hypointense in hepatobiliary phase, whereas FNH is isointense or hyperintense to the surrounding hepatic parenchyma. As for the identification of early HCCs, many papers recently published in literature have emphasized the contribution of hepatobiliary phase in the characterization of nodules without a typical hallmark of HCC. Atypical nodules (no hypervascularizaton observed on arterial phase and/or no hypovascular appearance on portal phase) with low signal intensity in the hepatobiliary phase, have a high probability of malignancy. Finally, regarding the evaluation of focal hepatic metastases, magnetic resonance pre-operative assessment using gadoxetic acid allows for more accurate diagnosis.

Functional MR imaging of the abdomen

In this article, functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques in the abdomen are discussed. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) increases the confidence in detecting and characterizing focal hepatic lesions. The potential uses of DWI in kidneys, adrenal glands, bowel, and pancreas are outlined. Studies have shown potential use of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parameters, such as K(trans), in predicting outcomes in cancer therapy. MR elastography is considered to be a useful tool in staging liver fibrosis. A major issue with all functional MR imaging techniques is the lack of standardization of the protocol.

Comparison of monopolar and bipolar diffusion weighted imaging sequences for detection of small hepatic metastases

OBJECTIVE

To compare monopolar (MP) and bipolar (BP) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in detecting small liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-eight patients underwent 3-T MRI. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the liver parenchyma and lesions, the lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR), and the detection sensitivities were compared. The lesion distortion was scored (LDS) from 4 (no distortion) to 1 (excessive distortion), dichotomised as no-distortion and distortion, and the association between detected lesions for each reader in the MP or BP DWI group and the dichotomised lesion distortion degree was assessed.

RESULT

Forty-six hepatic metastases were confirmed. The CNR with BP images showed significantly higher values than with MP (P=0.017). The detection sensitivities of the three readers were higher in the BP sequence than in MP, and one reader detected significantly more hepatic lesions with BP images (P=0.04). LDS was significantly improved with BP sequence (P=0.002). In the no-distortion group, excluding the MP DWI assessments of one reader, detection sensitivities were significantly higher than in the distortion group (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Reduced lesion distortion improves the detection of small liver metastases, and BP is more sensitive in detecting small liver metastases than MP DWI.

Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced 1.5-T MRI

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

Thirty patients were included and divided into three sets, as follows: gadopentetate dimeglumine set-hepatic arterial phase, portal venous phase, and delay phase; gadoxetic acid set-hepatic arterial phase, portal venous phase, and delay phase; combined set-gadoxetic acid set and hepatobiliary phase. The accuracy was assessed by the area under the alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic curve; the sensitivity and positive predictive value were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 81 colorectal liver metastases in all. Both readers noted higher diagnostic accuracies of the combined set than the other two sets. In the group of small lesions, both readers detected significantly higher sensitivities and positive predictive value on the combined set than the other two sets.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined set showed higher accuracy and sensitivity, especially significantly higher accuracy and sensitivity on small lesions.

Liver lesion detection and characterization: role of diffusion-weighted imaging

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) plays an emerging role for the assessment of focal and diffuse liver diseases. This growing interest is due to that fact that DWI is a noncontrast technique with inherent high contrast resolution, with promising results for detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Recent advances in diffusion image quality have also added interest to this technique in the abdomen. The purpose of this review is to describe the current clinical roles of DWI for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, and to review pitfalls, limitations, and future directions of DWI for assessment of focal liver disease.