Effectiveness of semi-quantitative multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of malignancy in complex adnexal masses: radiological and pathological correlation

Tumor biomarkers contribute to the diagnosis and clinical management of the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system for epithelial ovarian tumors

BACKGROUND

To assess the effectiveness of tumor biomarkers in distinguishing epithelial ovarian tumors (EOTs) and guiding clinical decisions across each Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI risk category, the aim is to prevent unnecessary surgeries for benign lesions, avoid delays in treating malignancies, and benefit individuals requiring fertility preservation or those intolerant to over-extensive surgery.

METHODS

A total of 54 benign, 104 borderline, and 203 malignant EOTs (BeEOTs, BEOTs and MEOTs) were enrolled and retrospectively assigned risk scores. The role of tumor biomarkers in diagnosing and managing EOTs within each risk category was evaluated by combining receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with clinicopathological characteristics.

RESULTS

A score of 3 was assigned to 66.67% of BeEOTs, 50.96% of BEOTs, and 13.80% of MEOTs, whereas cancer antigen 125 (CA125) ≥ 60.39 U/ml helped identify MEOTs with a low-risk time-intensity curve (TIC) for prompt surgical assessment. Only 3.7% of the BeEOTs were classified as O-RADS MRI 4/5, whereas 48.08% and 86.2% of the BEOTs and MEOTs were classified, respectively. Overall, EOTs with a score of 4/5 are candidates for semi-elective surgery owing to the low probability of benign lesions. For EOTs with a ROMA index less than 20.14% (premenopausal) or 29.9% (postmenopausal), minimally invasive surgery is recommended for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Comprehensive staging or cytoreductive surgery is recommended for the remaining patients, especially when fertility preservation is not a priority.

CONCLUSIONS

The O-RADS MRI primarily differentiates BeEOTs with risk scores of 2/4/5 from BEOTs/MEOTs, while tumor biomarkers further enhance the diagnosis and clinical management of EOTs with scores of 3/4/5. Future studies should focus on multi-center, prospective studies with larger sample sizes to validate and refine the integration of O-RADS MRI with tumor biomarkers.

MRI features of ovarian teratomas with somatic-type malignancy and mature cystic teratomas

PURPOSE

We evaluated the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ovarian teratomas with somatic-type malignancy (TSMs) and benign ovarian mature cystic teratomas (MCTs) to determine the diagnostic contribution of the MRI findings for differentiating these two teratomas.

METHODS

We compared the MRI findings between ovarian TSMs (n = 10) and MCTs (n = 193), and we conducted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the MRI findings' contribution to the differentiation of TSMs from MCTs.

RESULTS

The maximum diameters of whole lesion and the largest solid component in the TSMs were larger than those of the MCTs (p = 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Fat tissue in solid components was seen in 73/116 (62.9%) MCTs but in none of the TSMs (p = 0.0001). Ring-like enhancement in solid components was seen in 60/116 (51.7%) MCTs and none of the TSMs (p = 0.0031). On dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI), all of the solid components in the TSMs showed a high- or intermediate-risk time intensity curve (TIC), and those in 113 of the 116 (97.4%) MCTs showed a low-risk TIC (p < 0.0001). The area under the curve of the ROC analysis using the high-/intermediate-risk TIC on DCE MRI was the highest (0.99) for differentiating TSMs from MCTs: sensitivity 100%, specificity 97.4%, positive predictive value 75.0%, negative predictive value 100%, and accuracy, 97.6%.

CONCLUSION

Compared to ovarian MCTs, ovarian TSMs are larger and have larger solid components with high- or intermediate-risk TICs on DCE MRI. Ovarian MCTs frequently show small solid components with fat tissue, ring-like enhancement, and a low-risk TIC on DCE MRI.

The Roles of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI in the Evaluation of Adnexal Lesions

The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) is an evidence-based clinical support system for ovarian and adnexal lesion assessment in women of average risk. The system has both US and MRI components with separate but complementary lexicons and assessment categories to assign the risk of malignancy. US is an appropriate initial imaging modality, and O-RADS US can accurately help to characterize most adnexal lesions. MRI is a valuable adjunct imaging tool to US, and O-RADS MRI can help to both confirm a benign diagnosis and accurately stratify lesions that are at risk for malignancy. This article will review the O-RADS US and MRI systems, highlight their similarities and differences, and provide an overview of the interplay between the systems. When used together, the O-RADS US and MRI systems can help to accurately diagnose benign lesions, assess the risk of malignancy in lesions suspicious for malignancy, and triage patients for optimal management.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms: 2023 Update

Asymptomatic adnexal masses are commonly encountered in daily radiology practice. Although the vast majority of these masses are benign, a small subset have a risk of malignancy, which require gynecologic oncology referral for best treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, using a combination of both transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex Doppler technique can accurately characterize the majority of these lesions. MRI with and without contrast is a useful complementary modality that can help characterize indeterminate lesions and assess the risk of malignancy is those that are suspicious. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers and International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer

This study investigated whether combining International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules with tumor biomarkers would improve the diagnostic accuracy for early detection of adnexal malignancies. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of suspected adnexal tumors was performed in 226 women admitted for surgery at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo. Primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the combination of adnexal mass biomarkers and IOTA Simple Rules. IOTA Simple Rules combined with biomarker indications increased the diagnostic accuracy of classifying adnexal masses. Data analysis of individual measures showed that ferritin had the lowest rate of sensitivity.

Modified MR scoring system for assessment of sonographically indeterminate ovarian and adnexal masses in the absence of dynamic contrast-enhanced

OBJECTIVES

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is not available in all imaging centres to investigate adnexal masses. We proposed modified magnetic resonance (MR) scoring system based on an assessment of the enhancement of the solid tissue on early phase postcontrast series and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map and investigated the validity of this protocols in the current study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional retrospective study, pelvic MRI of a total of 245 patients with 340 adnexal masses were studied based on the proposed modified scoring system and ADNEX MR scoring system.

RESULTS

Modified scoring system with the sensitivity of 87.3% and specificity of 94.6% has an accuracy of 92.1%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ADNEX MR scoring system is 96.6%, 91%, and 92.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the modified scoring system and ADNEX MR scoring system is 0.909 (with 0.870-0.938 95% confidence interval [CI]) and 0.938 (with 0.907-0.961 95% CI), respectively. Pairwise comparison of these area under the curves showed no significant difference (P = .053).

CONCLUSIONS

Modified scoring system is less sensitive than the ADNEX MR scoring system and more specific but the accuracy is not significantly different.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

According to our study, MR scoring system based on subjective assessment of the enhancement of the solid tissue on early phase postcontrast series and DWI with ADC map could be applicable in imaging centres that DCE is not available.

Practical Tips for Reporting Adnexal Lesions Using O-RADS MRI

The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI risk stratification system provides a standardized lexicon and evidence-based risk score for evaluation of adnexal lesions. The goals of the lexicon and risk score are to improve report quality and communication between radiologists and clinicians, reduce variability in the reporting language, and optimize management of adnexal lesions. The O-RADS MRI risk score is based on the presence or absence of specific imaging features, including the lipid content, enhancing solid tissue, number of loculi, and fluid type. The probability of malignancy ranges from less than 0.5% when there are benign features to approximately 90% when there is solid tissue with a high-risk time-intensity curve. This information can aid in optimizing management of patients with adnexal lesions. The authors present an algorithmic approach to the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system and highlight key teaching points and common pitfalls. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI): Genesis and Future Directions

Imaging plays an important role in characterizing and risk-stratifying commonly encountered adnexal lesions. Recently, the American College of Radiology (ACR) released the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) for ultrasound and subsequently for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The goal of the recently developed ACR O-RADS MRI risk stratification system is to improve the quality of imaging reports as well as the reproducibility of evaluating adnexal lesions on MRI. This review focuses on exploring this new system and its future refinements.

Accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system based on enhanced non-DCE MRI in the assessment of adnexal masses

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and reproducibility of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) risk stratification system based on enhanced non-dynamic contrast-enhanced (non-DCE) MRI in the diagnosis of adnexal masses.

METHODS

Patients who underwent conventional pelvic enhanced non-DCE MRI examination within one month prior to surgery formed the study population. Two experienced radiologists independently evaluated the images and assigned a score according to the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system. One of the radiologists reviewed the images and reassigned the scores after three months. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was evaluated with the k coefficient value. The adnexal masses that attained scores between 1 and 3 were considered benign, while those with scores of 4 or 5 were considered malignant. Analyses were conducted to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which were then used for evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of the developed system based on enhanced non-DCE MRI scan. The reference standard was histology.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients (mean age: 42.09 ± 12.42 years, age range: 20-84 years) were enrolled in the study. Among the 362 adnexal masses from the included patients, there were 320 benign masses and 42 malignant masses. In the case of three readers, there were no malignant tumors scored 1-2. The O-RADS MRI score ≥ 4 was associated with malignancy resulted in a good diagnostic efficacy with the areas under the curve (AUC) values of 0.918 (95 % CI, 0.864-0.972), 0.905 (95 % CI, 0.842-0.968), and 0.882 (95 % CI, 0.815-0.950), the sensitivity values of 90.5 % (95 % CI, 87.5-93.5 %), 85.7 % (95 % CI, 82.1-89.3 %), and 83.3 % (95 % CI, 79.5-87.2 %), and the specificity values of 93.1 % (95 % CI, 90.5-95.7 %), 95.3 % (95 % CI, 93.1-97.5 %), and 93.1 % (95 % CI, 90.5-95.7 %) obtained for the three readers, respectively. Excellent intra-observer agreement and inter-observer agreement were observed with the k values of 0.883 (95 % CI, 0.814-0.952) and 0.848 (95 % CI, 0.770-0.926), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The O-RADS MRI risk stratification system based on enhanced non-DCE MRI scans exhibited high accuracy and reproducibility in the prediction of adnexal masses malignancy. Enhanced non-DCE MRI scan may offer an alternative diagnostic tool when DCE is not possible.

O-RADS MRI Classification of Indeterminate Adnexal Lesions: Time-Intensity Curve Analysis Is Better Than Visual Assessment

Background The MRI Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) enables risk stratification of sonographically indeterminate adnexal lesions, partly based on time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, which may not be universally available. Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of visual assessment with that of TIC assessment of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI scans to categorize adnexal lesions as benign or malignant and to evaluate the influence on the O-RADS MRI score. Materials and Methods The European Adnex MR Study Group, or EURAD, database, a prospective multicenter study of women undergoing MRI for indeterminate adnexal lesions between March 2013 and March 2018, was queried retrospectively. Women undergoing surgery for an adnexal lesion with solid tissue were included. Solid tissue enhancement relative to outer myometrium was assessed visually and with TIC. Contrast material washout was recorded. Lesions were categorized according to the O-RADS MRI score with visual and TIC assessment. Per-lesion diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Results A total of 320 lesions (207 malignant, 113 benign) in 244 women (mean age, 55.3 years ± 15.8 [standard deviation]) were analyzed. Sensitivity for malignancy was 96% (198 of 207) and 76% (157 of 207) for TIC and visual assessment, respectively. TIC was more accurate than visual assessment (86% [95% CI: 81, 90] vs 78% [95% CI: 73, 82]; P < .001) for benign lesions, predominantly because of higher specificity (95% [95% CI: 92, 98] vs 76% [95% CI: 68, 81]). A total of 21% (38 of 177) of invasive lesions were rated as low risk visually. Contrast material washout and high-risk enhancement (defined as earlier enhancement than in the myometrium) were highly specific for malignancy for both TIC (97% [95% CI: 91, 99] and 94% [95% CI: 90, 97], respectively) and visual assessment (97% [95% CI: 92, 99] and 93% [95% CI: 88, 97], respectively). O-RADS MRI score was more accurate with TIC than with visual assessment (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.90] vs 0.73 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.78]; P < .001). Conclusion Time-intensity curve analysis was more accurate than visual assessment for achieving optimal diagnostic accuracy with the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI score. Clinical trial registration no. NCT01738789 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Vargas and Woo in this issue.

Impact of Multiparametric MRI (mMRI) on the Therapeutic Management of Adnexal Masses Detected with Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS): An Interdisciplinary Management Approach

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Adnexal masses detected incidentally at transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) are a common and still challenging diagnostic problem. The primary goal of further imaging is an accurate tissue characterization so an optimal treatment plan can be devised including surgery only for lesions that are indeterminate or malignant. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of complementary multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) for treatment planning in patients with adnexal masses, and to assess how it ultimately correlates with subsequent histopathologic findings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 126 women (mean age: 54.6 years) with indeterminate adnexal masses underwent mMRI at 3T in addition to TVUS and testing to determine their CA-125 levels. The mMRI protocol consisted of a high-resolution T2-TSE in three planes, diffusion weighted images and dynamic contrast enhanced. First the character of the adnexal mass and the associated management decision (follow-up, laparoscopy or laparotomy) were assessed independently for each diagnostic method (TVUS + CA-125 and mMRI). All methods were then assessed in synopsis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each diagnostic method alone and in combination were calculated. The standard of reference was either final histology in women who underwent surgery or follow-up of at least 24 months in women who underwent follow-up.

RESULTS

In 67.5% (85/126) of all patients, the adnexal mass was benign; a malignant tumor was diagnosed in 28.6% (36/126) and a borderline tumor in the remaining 4% (5/126) of patients. The diagnostic indices were as follows for TVUS + CA 125 alone, mMRI alone and all three methods combined: sensitivity 86% (31/36), 97% (35/36), and 100% (36/36); specificity 32% (29/90), 83% (75/90), and 80% (68/90); PPV 34% (31/91), 70% (35/50), and 74% (40/54); and NPV 65% (29/44), 98% (75/76), and 100% (72/72). Complementary use of mMRI changed the therapeutic management decision in 34% (41/126) of all patients. In 40.7% (37/91) of patients for whom surgery had been recommended based on TVUS + CA-125, MRI revealed a typical benign finding such that those patients underwent follow-up instead of surgery. None of the examined masses exhibited (tumor) progression or malignancy during the follow-up period. A laparotomy was performed instead of a laparoscopy in 8.7% (11/126) based on the mMRI result.

CONCLUSION

MRI helps significantly improve sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis in patients with indeterminate adnexal masses detected at TVUS. Its diagnostic information revised the planned treatment in more than one-third of women.

O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee

MRI plays an important role as a secondary test or problem-solving modality in the evaluation of adnexal lesions depicted at US. MRI has increased specificity compared with US, decreasing the number of false-positive diagnoses for malignancy and thereby avoiding unnecessary or over-extensive surgery in patients with benign lesions or borderline tumors, while women with possible malignancies can be expeditiously referred for oncologic surgical evaluation. The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI Committee is an international collaborative effort formed under the direction of the American College of Radiology and includes a diverse group of experts on adnexal imaging and management who developed the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system. This scoring system assigns a probability of malignancy based on the MRI features of an adnexal lesion and provides information to facilitate optimal patient management. The widespread implementation of a codified reporting system will lead to improved interpretation agreement and standardized communication between radiologists and referring physicians. In addition, it will allow for high-quality multi-institutional collaborations-an important unmet need that has hampered the performance of high-quality research in this area in the past. This article provides guidelines on using the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system in clinical practice, as well as in the educational and research settings.

MRI characteristics for differentiating mucinous borderline ovarian tumours from mucinous ovarian cancers

AIM

To investigate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics that could differentiate mucinous borderline ovarian tumours (MBOTs) from mucinous ovarian cancers (MOCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRI data from 75 patients with MBOTs and 38 patients with MOCs were reviewed retrospectively. The clinicopathological and MRI features, including age, bilaterality, maximum diameter (MD), shape, margin, configuration, cystic-solid interface, papillae, MD of the cyst walls and septa, MD of the solid components, number of cysts, honeycomb loculi, signal of the cystic and solid components, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and enhancement ratio of the solid components, peritoneal implants and ascites, were compared using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were 76 MBOTs and 39 MOCs, and median patient age was 41 years (range 16-77 years) and 51 years (range 15-90 years), respectively (p=0.004). There were significant differences between MBOTs and MOCs regarding the presence of papillae (p=0.013), MD of the solid components (p=0.001), enhancement ratio of the solid components (p=0.003), ADC value (p<0.001), and ascites (p<0.001). The optimal cut-off ADC value was 1.16 × 10^-3 mm²/s, with a sensitivity of 87.1%, a specificity of 83.3%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.917.

CONCLUSION

Compared with MOCs, MBOTs had fewer papillae or solid components, lower enhancement ratio, higher ADC values, and were less likely to have moderate or massive ascites.

Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MR (DCE-MR) and delayed contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI added to unenhanced MRI, including diffusion weighted image (DWI) for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors, conducting a retrospective blinded image interpretation study.

METHODS

Data of 80 patients suspected of having adnexal tumors by ultrasonography between April 2008 and August 2018 were used for the study. All patients had undergone preoperative MRI and surgical resection at our institution. Four radiologists (two specialized in gynecological radiology and two non-specialized) were enrolled for blinded review of the MR images. A 3-point scale was used: 0 = benign, 1 = indeterminate, and 2 = malignant. Three imaging sets were reviewed: Set A, unenhanced MRI including DWI; Set B, Set A and delayed CE-T1WI; and Set C, Set A and DCE-MRI. Imaging criteria for benign and malignant tumors were given in earlier reports. The diagnostic performance of the three imaging sets of the four readers was calculated. Their areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared using the DeLong method.

RESULTS

Accuracies of Set B were 81%-88%. Those of Set C were 81%-85%. The AUCs of Set B were 0.83 and 0.89. Those of Set C were 0.81-0.86. For two readers, Set A showed lower accuracy and AUC than Set B/Set C (less than 0.80), although those were equivalent in other readers. No significant difference in AUCs was found among the three sequence sets. Intrareader agreement was moderate to almost perfect in Sets A and B, and substantial to almost perfect in Set C.

CONCLUSION

DCE-MR showed no superiority for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors from benign tumors compared to delayed CE-T1WI with conventional MR and DWI.

[Adnexal Masses: Clinical Application of Multiparametric MR Imaging & O-RADS MRI]

Incidental adnexal masses considered indeterminate for malignancy are commonly observed on ultrasonography. Multiparametric MRI is the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. Conventional MRI enables a confident pathologic diagnosis of various benign lesions due to accurate tissue characterization of fat, blood, fibrous tissue, and solid components. Additionally, functional imaging sequences, including perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging, improve the diagnostic efficacy of conventional MRI in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS) MRI was recently designed to provide consistent interpretations in assigning risk of malignancy to ovarian and other adnexal masses, and to provide a management recommendation for each risk category. In this review, we describe the clinical application of multiparametric MRI for the evaluation of adnexal masses and introduce the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system.

Diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for malignant ovarian tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accurate preoperative diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumors (MOTs) is particularly important for selecting the optimal treatment strategy and avoiding overtreatment.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for MOTs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to find relevant original articles up to October 2019. The included studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Studies on the diagnosis of MOTs with quantitative or semi-quantitative DCE-MRI were analyzed separately. The bivariate random-effects model was used to assess the diagnostic authenticity. Meta-regression analyses were performed to analyze the potential heterogeneity.

RESULTS

For semi-quantitative DCE-MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.92), 85% (95% CI 0.77-0.91), 5.8 (95% CI 3.8-8.8), 0.17 (95% CI 0.10-0.30), 33 (95% CI 18-61), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94), respectively. For quantitative DCE-MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, negative LR, DOR, and AUC were 88% (95% CI 0.65-0.96), 93% (95% CI 0.78-0.98), 12.3 (95% CI 3.4-43.9), 0.13 (95% CI 0.04-0.45), 91 (95% CI 10-857), and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.98), respectively.

CONCLUSION

DCE-MRI has great diagnostic value for MOTs. Semi-quantitative DCE-MRI may be a relatively mature approach; however, quantitative DCE-MRI appears to be more promising than semi-quantitative DCE-MRI.

Ovary: MRI characterisation and O-RADS MRI

Ultrasound has a high specificity for the diagnosis of a benign lesion in cases of classic appearing simple cyst, hemorrhagic cyst, endometrioma and dermoid. However, ultrasound can sometimes be limited for definitive characterisation and risk stratification of other types of lesions, including those with echogenic content that may appear solid, with or without blood flow. Frequently, MRI can be used to further characterise these types of lesions, due to its ability to distinguish solid tissue from non-tissue solid components such as fat, blood, or debris. Incorporating the MR imaging into the evaluation of adnexal lesions can improve diagnostic certainty and guide clinical management potentially avoiding inappropriate surgery for benign lesions and expediting appropriate treatment for malignant lesions, particularly in the females with sonographically indeterminate adnexal lesions.

Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Lexicon for MRI: A White Paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems MRI Committee

MRI is used in the evaluation of ovarian and adnexal lesions. MRI can further characterize lesions seen on ultrasound to help decrease the number of false-positive lesions and avoid unnecessary surgery in benign lesions. Currently, the reporting of ovarian and adnexal findings on MRI is inconsistent because of the lack of standardized descriptor terminology. The development of uniform reporting descriptors can lead to improved interpretation agreement and communication between radiologists and referring physicians. The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems MRI Committee was formed under the direction of the ACR to create a standardized lexicon for adnexal lesions with the goal of improving the quality and consistency of imaging reports. This white paper describes the consensus process in the creation of a standardized lexicon for ovarian and adnexal lesions for MRI and the resultant lexicon.

Multimodality imaging review of complex pelvic lesions in female pelvis

Complex pelvic lesions can originate from various anatomical structures in the pelvis and pose a diagnostic dilemma due to a wide range of possible diagnoses. Accurate characterisation of these lesions would often require an algorithmic approach, which incorporates clinical findings, sequential use of multiple imaging modalities and a multiparametric approach. This approach usually aims at identifying key imaging features, which aid in anatomical localisation, morphology and tissue characterisation. There have been various attempts to standardise the lexicon used for describing adnexal masses in female patients; stratify their risk of cancer and suggest appropriate next steps in the management pathway. Through this review, we extend this approach to complex pelvic masses in female pelvis in general and will focus on optimal use of different imaging modalities to arrive at definitive diagnosis or meaningful differential diagnosis. We will also discuss potential pitfalls of imaging diagnosis and common mimics.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms

There are approximately 9.1 pelvic surgeries performed for every histologically confirmed adnexal malignancy in the United States, compared to 2.3 surgeries per malignancy (in oncology centers) and 5.9 surgeries per malignancy (in other centers) in Europe. An important prognostic factor in the long-term survival in patients with ovarian malignancy is the initial management by a gynecological oncologist. With high accuracy of imaging for adnexal mass characterization and consequent appropriate triage to subspecialty referral, the better use of gynecologic oncology can improve treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, including transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex ultrasound, combined with MRI with contrast can diagnose adnexal masses as benign with specific features (ie, functional masses, dermoid, endometrioma, fibroma, pedunculated fibroid, hydrosalpinx, peritoneal inclusion cyst, Tarlov cyst), malignant, or indeterminate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Validity and Reproducibility of the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses (AM) signifies a major challenge in clinical practice. Early detection and characterization have increased the need for accurate imaging evaluation before treatment.

PURPOSE

To assess the validity and reproducibility of the ADNEX MR Scoring system in the diagnosis of sonographically indeterminate AM.

STUDY TYPE

A prospective multicenter study.

POPULATION

In all, 531 women (mean age, 44 ± 11.2 years; range, 21-79 years) with 572 sonographically indeterminate AM.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5T/precontrast T₁ -weighted imaging (WI) fast spin echo (FSE) (in-phase and out-of-phase, with and without fat suppression); T₂ -WI FSE; diffusion-WI single-shot echo planner with b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm² ; and dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion T₁ -WI liver acquisition with volume acceleration (LAVA).

ASSESSMENT

All MRI examinations were evaluated by three radiologists, and the AM were categorized into five scores based on the ADNEX MR Scoring system. Score 1: no AM; 2: benign AM; 3: probably benign AM; 4: indeterminate AM; 5: probably malignant AM. Histopathology and imaging follow-up were used as the standard references for evaluating the validity of the ADNEX MR Scoring system for detecting ovarian malignancy.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Four-fold table test, kappa statistics (κ), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

In all, 136 (23.8%) AM were malignant, and 436 (76.2%) were benign. Of the 350 AM classified as score 2, one (0.3%) was malignant; of the 62 AM classified as score 3, six (9.7%) were malignant; of the 73 AM classified as score 4, 43 (58.9%) were malignant; and of the 87 AM categorized as score 5, 86 (98.9%) were malignant. The best cutoff value for predicting malignant AM was score >3 with sensitivity and specificity of 92.9% and 94.9%, respectively. The interreader agreement of the ADNEX MR Scoring was very good (κ = 0.861).

DATA CONCLUSION

The current study supports the high validity and reproducibility of the ADNEX MR Scoring system for the diagnosis of sonographically indeterminate AM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in characterizing ovarian tumors classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether there is a significant relationship between the shape of the time-intensity curve on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of ovarian tumors classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography and the type of lesion (benign, borderline, or malignant) to enable an accurate presurgical diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to study 68 ovarian tumors that were classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography. We included only cases for which a definitive diagnosis (histologic diagnosis or ≥1 year stability on imaging tests) was available. Each case was classified as benign, borderline, or malignant. To analyze the MRI studies, we marked regions of interest in the lesion and in the myometrium (as a reference). We obtained a curve defined by the relation between the intensity of enhancement and time and classified each tumor according to four predefined curve types. We also analyzed semiquantitative parameters. Finally, we compared the results for each of the three groups of tumors.

RESULTS

We found significant associations (p <0.001) between the curves without early enhancement and benign and borderline lesions as well as between the curves with early enhancement and malignant lesions. Malignant lesions were significantly associated with the semiquantitative enhancement parameters: maximum (p=0.002), maximum relative (p=0.006), and relative (p=0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

In ovarian tumors classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can be useful for classification as benign, borderline, or malignant because the malignant lesions are significantly associated with early enhancement curves.

Ultra-High-b-Value Kurtosis Imaging for Noninvasive Tissue Characterization of Ovarian Lesions

Background MRI with contrast material enhancement is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. The role of diffusion-weighted MRI, however, remains controversial. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultra-high-b-value diffusion kurtosis MRI in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study evaluated consecutive women with sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses between November 2016 and December 2018. MRI at 3.0 T was performed, including diffusion-weighted MRI (b values of 0-2000 sec/mm²). Lesions were segmented on b of 1500 sec/mm² by two readers in consensus and an additional independent reader by using full-lesion segmentations on a single transversal slice. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculation and kurtosis fitting were performed. Differences in ADC, kurtosis-derived ADC (D_app), and apparent kurtosis coefficient (K_app) between malignant and benign lesions were assessed by using a logistic mixed model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for ADC, D_app, and K_app to discriminate malignant from benign lesions was calculated, as was specificity at a sensitivity level of 100%. Results from two independent reads were compared. Histopathologic analysis served as the reference standard. Results A total of 79 ovarian lesions in 58 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 48 years ± 14) were evaluated. Sixty-two (78%) lesions showed benign and 17 (22%) lesions showed malignant histologic findings. ADC and D_app were lower and K_app was higher in malignant lesions: median ADC, D_app, and K_app were 0.74 µm²/msec (range, 0.52-1.44 µm²/msec), 0.98 µm²/msec (range, 0.63-2.12 µm²/msec), and 1.01 (range, 0.69-1.30) for malignant lesions, and 1.13 µm²/msec (range, 0.35-2.63 µm²/msec), 1.45 µm²/msec (range, 0.44-3.34 µm²/msec), and 0.65 (range, 0.44-1.43) for benign lesions (P values of .01, .02, < .001, respectively). AUC for K_app of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.94) was higher than was AUC from ADC of 0.78 (95% confidence interval: 0.67, 0.89; P = .047). Conclusion Diffusion-weighted MRI by using quantitative kurtosis variables is superior to apparent diffusion coefficient values in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian lesions and might be of future help in clinical practice, especially in patients with contraindication to contrast media application. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Staging MRI of uterine malignant mixed Müllerian tumors versus endometrial carcinomas with emphasis on dynamic enhancement characteristics

PURPOSE

To determine whether staging pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can distinguish malignant mixed Müllerian tumor (MMMT) from EC.

METHODS

Thirty-seven treatment-naïve patients with histologically proven uterine MMMT and 42 treatment-naïve patients with EC, treated at our institution, were included in our retrospective study. Staging pelvic MRI scans were reviewed for tumor size, prolapse through cervical os, and other features. Time-intensity curves for tumor and surrounding myometrium regions of interest were generated, and positive enhancement integral (PEI), maximum slope of increase (MSI), and signal enhancement ratio (SER) were measured. The Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare characteristics between disease groups. Multivariate and univariate logistic regression models were used to distinguish MMMT from EC. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate prediction ability.

RESULTS

MMMTs were larger than ECs with higher rate of tumor prolapse and more heterogeneous tumor enhancement compared to ECs. During the late phase of contrast enhancement, 100% of ECs, but only 84% of MMMTs, had lower signal intensity than the myometrium. Threshold PEI ratio ≥ 0.67 predict MMMT with 76% sensitivity, 84%, specificity and 0.83 AUC. Threshold SER ≤ 125 predict MMMT with 90% sensitivity, 50% specificity, and 0.72 AUC.

CONCLUSION

MMMTs may show more frequent tumor prolapse, more heterogeneous enhancement, delayed iso- or hyper-enhancement, higher PEI ratios, and lower tumor SERs compared with EC. MRI can be used as a biomarker to distinguish MMMT from EC based on the enhancement pattern.

Functional MRI in the pre-operative assessment of GI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 ovarian masses

Background

Characterization of an ovarian lesion is a diagnostic challenge. A correct preoperative assessment is of great importance so as to arrange adequate therapeutic procedures. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of functional MRI in differentiation between malignant, borderline, and benign ovarian masses.

Results

This study included 56 adnexal lesions. Bilateral synchronous ovarian lesions are detected in 16 cases. Postoperative histologically proved to be benign in 17 (30%), borderline (low potential malignancy) in 12 (22%), and malignant in 27 (48%). The overall diagnostic performance of conventional MRI in the diagnosis of adenexal lesion was a sensitivity of 74%, specificity of 47%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 76%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 44%, and an accuracy of 66%. Functional pelvic MRI examination showed an increase in overall diagnostic performance compared to conventional values with the highest sensitivity of 90% and NPV of 67% using DWI, and the highest specificity of 88%, PPV of 94%, and an accuracy of 82% using DCE MRI.

Conclusion

Functional MRI in conjugation with conventional MRI plays a key role in the ovarian lesion detection, characterization, and staging. Functional MRI is currently being evaluated as possible predictive and prognostic biomarkers in ovarian lesions.

MR imaging in discriminating between benign and malignant paediatric ovarian masses: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal masses in children and adolescents might be of great value in the diagnostic workup of sonographically indeterminate masses, since preserving fertility is of particular importance in this population. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic value of MR imaging in children with an ovarian mass.

METHODS

The review was made according to the PRISMA Statement. PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies on the use of MR imaging in differential diagnosis of ovarian masses in both adult women and children from 2008 to 2018.

RESULTS

Sixteen paediatric and 18 adult studies were included. In the included studies, MR imaging has shown good diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. MR imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging seem to further improve the diagnostic performance.

CONCLUSION

The addition of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values measured in enhancing components of solid lesions and DCE imaging may further increase the good diagnostic performance of MR imaging in the pre-operative differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses by increasing specificity. Prospective age-specific studies are needed to confirm the high diagnostic performance of MR imaging in children and adolescents with a sonographically indeterminate ovarian mass.

KEY POINTS

• MR imaging, based on several morphological features, is of good diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. Sensitivity and specificity varied between 84.8 to 100% and 20.0 to 98.4%, respectively. • MR imaging techniques like diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging seem to improve the diagnostic performance. • Specific studies in children and adolescents with ovarian masses are required to confirm the suggested increased diagnostic performance of DWI and DCE in this population.

Multiparametric MRI Evaluation of Complex Ovarian Masses

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the categorization of complex ovarian masses into benign and malignant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was done on 33 complex ovarian masses. T1 and T2-weighted sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were performed on 1.5 T MRI. Time-intensity curves, tissue signal intensity on unenhanced T1 images (SI₀), maximum absolute contrast enhancement (SI_max), time to reach SI_max (T_max), maximum relative SI (SI_rel = [SI_max - SI₀]/SI₀ ×100), maximum Slope (Slope_max = SI_rel/T_max ×100), and wash in rate (WIR = [SI_max - SI₀]/T_max) were calculated. Histopathological diagnosis was taken as gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 20/33 masses were benign, 2/33 were borderline tumors, and 11/33 were malignant. Diffusion restriction was seen in all malignant masses and 13/20 benign masses. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient values showed a significant difference between malignant and benign, with 81.8% sensitivity and 63.6% specificity. Type III curve showed 100% specificity for malignant lesions. T_max and Slope_max were useful in differentiating benign and malignant masses; with T_max cut-off at 73.5 seconds having a high specificity (81.8%) and Slope_max cut-off at 0.83%/s having high sensitivity (91%) and negative predictive value (94.4%).

CONCLUSION

Multiparametric MRI confers high diagnostic accuracy in stratifying complex ovarian masses.

Comparison of Qualitative (Time Intensity Curve Analysis), Semi-Quantitative, and Quantitative Multi-Phase 3T DCEMRI Parameters as Predictors of Malignancy in Adnexal

Objective:

The present study aimed to compare the qualitative (time intensity curve analysis), the semi-quantitative and the quantitative multiphase 3T dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters as predictors of malignancy in adnexal masses. Materials and

Methods:

In this prospective study, women with an adnexal mass who were scheduled for surgical resection or were followed for more than one year period to confirm the benignity of their lesions, underwent multiphase 3T DCE-MRI. The qualitative (time intensity curve), semi-quantitative (SImax, SIrel, WIR) and quantitative (Ktrans, Kep, Vb) analyses were performed on DCE-MRI sequences and their predictive values were compared.

Results:

A total of 17 benign and 14 malignant lesions were included. According to the qualitative analysis, none of the lesions with Type I time intensity curves (TIC) were malignant and none of the masses with Type III TICs were benign. The accuracy of the quantitative parameters in detection of malignancy was found to be higher than that of semi-quantitative variables, particularly when calculated for a small ROI within the high signal area of the mass (sROI) rather than the largest ROI including the whole mass (lROI), and when inter-MRI variations were omitted using ratios. The Kep(tumor)/Kep(myometrium) ratio measured from sROI was the best parameter for differentiating a malignant lesion with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92.3%.

Conclusion:

We concluded that a Type I TIC confirms a benign lesion, and a type III TIC confirms the malignancy and further evaluation is not recommended for these lesions. So complementary quantitative analysis is only recommended for adnexal masses with type II TICs.

Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI): Quantitative and Semi-quantitative analysis at 3-Tesla MRI

Background:

To evaluate the utility of the pharmacokinetic modeling derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses.

Methods:

A total of 43 patients with 49 complex adnexal masses (27 benign, 3 borderline, and 19 malignant lesions) underwent preoperative DCE-MRI examinations on a 3 Tesla MRI. Using extended Tofts’ model, quantitative analysis was performed in the solid components of all tumors. Three pharmacokinetic parameters were defined as volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans), the rate constant (Kep), and the plasma volume (Vp). Semi-quantitative analysis was also performed and the values of relative signal intensity (SI rel) wash-in-rate (WIR), the initial area under the curve (iAUC60), time-to-peak (TTP) and wash-out-rate (WOR) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic characteristics of each DCE-MRI parameter in differentiating borderline/malignant tumors from benign lesions and to provide the optimal cutoff values for these variables.

Results:

SI rel had the highest diagnostic value (AUC=0.872; p<0.001; cut-off=121.4 associated with an overall accuracy=79.6%, sensitivity=95.5%, specificity=66.7%, NPV=94.8% and PPV=70.0%). Ktrans had the second highest AUC=0.836 (p<0.001; cut-off=0.034 associated with an overall accuracy=79.6%, sensitivity=86.4%, specificity=74.1%, NPV=87.0% and PPV=73.1%). The other factors found to be acceptable diagnostic parameters for borderline/malignant lesions included WIR (AUC=0.816; p<0.001), iAUC60 (AUC=0.808; p<0.001), Vp (AUC=0.795; p<0.001), SI max (AUC=0.737, p=0.005), SI peak (AUC=0.737; p=0.005) and Kep (AUC=0.681; p=0.031).

Conclusion:

Quantitative DCE-MRI is a relevant tool for differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. Among all the DCE parameters, SI rel and Ktrans are the most accurate discriminators.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion of normal muscle in adult hips: Variation of permeability and semi-quantitative parameters

The purpose of this prospective study was to ascertain the degree of variation of semi-quantitative and permeability parameters on DCE-MRI of normally appearing striated muscles. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the right hip was performed in 20 women and 24 men. Mean age was 39.1 ± 12.4 years. Two regions of interest (ROI) were drawn in twelve muscles of anterior, medial and gluteal compartments: a free-form ROI covering the largest muscle section and a smaller elliptical ROI. Semi-quantitative and permeability parameters were calculated using the extended Tofts model. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed model to assess perfusion parameters variation. Intra- and inter-observer agreements were assessed. The intra-observer agreement was considered to be good for free-form ROI (minimum Intra-Class Coefficient (ICC) = 0.72) and moderate for elliptical ROI (minimum ICC = 0.51), while the inter-observer agreement was considered to be bad in both cases (minimum ICC = 0.11). There was a high inter-individual variation in most of the perfusion parameters evaluated. The average coefficients of variation were: Time To Peak = 9%, Area Under the Curve = 44%, V_e = 61%, K_ep = 90%, Initial Slope = 99%, and K^trans = 128%. A considerable variation in resting muscle perfusion parameters was seen. This could lead to errors in the analysis of muscle DCE-MRI studies or oncologic/non oncologic studies using muscle as a referential. Further studies targeted on acquisition protocols and post-processing software are necessary to improve the performance of muscle MR perfusion.

Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumors

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of quantitative DCE-MRI for characterizing ovarian tumors.

METHODS

We prospectively assessed the differences of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (K^trans, k_ep, and v_e) among 15 benign, 28 borderline, and 66 malignant ovarian tumors; and between type I (n = 28) and type II (n = 29) of epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOCs). DCE-MRI data were analyzed using whole solid tumor volume region of interest (ROI) method, and quantitative parameters were calculated based on a modified Tofts model. The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-square test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), variance test, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The largest K^trans and k_ep values were observed in ovarian malignant tumors, followed by borderline and benign tumors (all P < 0.001). K_ep was the better parameter for differentiating benign tumors from borderline and malignant tumors, with a sensitivity of 89.3% and 95.5%, a specificity of 86.7% and 100%, an accuracy of 88.4% and 96.3%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 and 0.992, respectively, whereas K^trans was better for differentiating borderline from malignant tumors with a sensitivity of 60.7%, a specificity of 78.8%, an accuracy of 73.4%, and an AUC of 0.743. In addition, a combination with k_ep could further improve the sensitivity to 78.9%. The median K^trans and k_ep values were significantly higher in type II than in type I EOCs.

CONCLUSION

DCE-MRI with volume quantification is a technically feasible method, and can be used for the differentiation of ovarian tumors and for discriminating between type I and type II EOCs.

Role of Imaging in Fertility-sparing Treatment of Gynecologic Malignancies

Treatments for gynecologic cancer usually result in loss of fertility due to surgery or radical radiation therapy in the pelvis. In countries with an established screening program for cervical cancer, the majority of gynecologic malignancies occur in postmenopausal women. However, a substantial number of affected women are of childbearing age and have not completed their families. In these younger women, consideration of fertility preservation may be important. This article describes the fertility-sparing treatment options that are currently available and outlines the role of imaging in the selection of eligible patients on the basis of a review of the literature. In the setting of cervical cancer, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is used to delineate the size, position, and stage of the tumor for selection of patients who are suitable for radical trachelectomy. In patients with solitary complex adnexal masses, diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging sequences are used to categorize the likelihood of invasive or borderline malignancy for consideration of unilateral ovarian resection, with fertility preservation when possible. In patients with endometrial cancer, MR imaging is used to rule out signs of invasive disease before hormone therapy is considered. Imaging is also used at patient follow-up to detect recurrent disease; however, evidence to support this application is limited. In conclusion, imaging is an essential tool in the care of patients with gynecologic malignancies who are considering fertility-preserving treatment options. ^©RSNA, 2016.

MR Imaging for Incidental Adnexal Mass Characterization

Incidentally detected adnexal masses are common, and the overwhelming majority of them are benign. As many of these adnexal masses are considered indeterminate at CT or US, a large number of benign oophorectomies occur. Of the malignant adnexal masses, high-grade primary ovarian neoplasms with fast doubling times and early dissemination are the most common. Due to their aggressive behavior, diagnosis of malignancy by interval growth on surveillance imaging represents an undesirable option. Immediate MR characterization allows for a decreased rate of benign oophorectomies and expedited triage of patients to definitive treatment when malignancy is suspected.

The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in characterizing complex ovarian tumors

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to investigate the utility of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in the differentiation of malignant, borderline, and benign complex ovarian tumors.

METHODS

DCE-MRI data of 102 consecutive complex ovarian tumors (benign 15, borderline 16, and malignant 71), confirmed by surgery and histopathology, were analyzed retrospectively. The patterns (I, II, and III) of time-signal intensity curve (TIC) and three semi-quantitative parameters, including enhancement amplitude (EA), maximal slope (MS), and time of half rising (THR), were evaluated and compared among benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumors. The types of TIC were compared by Pearson Chi-square χ ² between malignant and benign, borderline tumors. The mean values of EA, MS, and THR were compared using one-way ANOVA or nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine of 71 (83%) malignant tumors showed a type-III TIC; 9 of 16 (56%) borderline tumors showed a type-II TIC, and 10 of 15 (67%) benign tumors showed a type-II TIC, with a statistically significant difference between malignant and benign tumors (P < 0.001) and between malignant and borderline tumors (P < 0.001). MS was significantly higher in malignant tumors than in benign tumors and in borderline than in benign tumors (P < 0.001, P = 0.013, respectively). THR was significantly lower in malignant tumors than in benign tumors and in borderline than in benign tumors (P < 0.001, P = 0.007, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between malignant and borderline tumors in MS and THR (P = 0.19, 0.153) or among malignant, borderline, and benign tumors in EA (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DCE-MRI is helpful for characterizing complex ovarian tumors; however, semi-quantitative parameters perform poorly when distinguishing malignant from borderline tumors.

Role of Imaging Tools for the Diagnosis of Borderline Ovarian Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) have a low malignant potential and occur most often in young women. Its preoperative diagnosis can improve surgical strategy and reproductive approach. This study systematically reviews the literature for the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), magnetic resonance (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) in the diagnostic of BOTs. We conducted a search in PubMed/Medline of articles in English from the last 5 years and included 14 studies for systematic review, 9 of them in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensibility and specificity was respectively 77.0% and 83.0% for TVUS (5 studies) and 85% and 74% for MRI (4 studies) in differentiating benign from malignant BOTs. CT and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT techniques were heterogeneous between studies, so a meta-analysis was not performed for the 4 studies on CT and PET-CT. However, these 4 studies have also shown a high accuracy in differentiating BOTs from malignant ovarian cancers.

Functional MR imaging in gynecologic malignancies: current status and future perspectives

Using functional MR imaging techniques, we can approach the functional assessment of gynecologic malignancies. Among them, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) are two important techniques. This article provides an overview of functional MR imaging techniques, focusing DWI and DCE-MRI on clinical application in gynecologic malignancies. Functional MR imaging techniques play an important role in detection, characterization, staging, treatment response, and outcome prediction, as well as providing conventional morphologic imaging. Familiarity with the characteristics and imaging features of functional MR imaging in gynecologic malignancies will facilitate prompt and accurate diagnosis and treatment.

ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update

Abstract

An update of the 2010 published ESUR recommendations of MRI of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass integrating functional techniques is provided. An algorithmic approach using sagittal T2 and a set of transaxial T1 and T2WI allows categorization of adnexal masses in one of the following three types according to its predominant signal characteristics. T1 'bright' masses due to fat or blood content can be simply and effectively determined using a combination of T1W, T2W and FST1W imaging. When there is concern for a solid component within such a mass, it requires additional assessment as for a complex cystic or cystic-solid mass. For low T2 solid adnexal masses, DWI is now recommended. Such masses with low DWI signal on high b value image (e.g. > b 1000 s/mm²) can be regarded as benign. Any other solid adnexal mass, displaying intermediate or high DWI signal, requires further assessment by contrast-enhanced (CE)T1W imaging, ideally with DCE MR, where a type 3 curve is highly predictive of malignancy. For complex cystic or cystic-solid masses, both DWI and CET1W—preferably DCE MRI—is recommended. Characteristic enhancement curves of solid components can discriminate between lesions that are highly likely malignant and highly likely benign.

Key Points

• MRI is a useful complementary imaging technique for assessing sonographically indeterminate masses.

• Categorization allows confident diagnosis in the majority of adnexal masses.

• Type 3 contrast enhancement curve is a strong indicator of malignancy.

• In sonographically indeterminate masses, complementary MRI assists in triaging patient management.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4600-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

External validation of the MR imaging scoring system for the management of adnexal masses

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic value of ADNEX Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring in the preoperative management of adnexal masses.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study on patients who underwent surgery for an adnexal mass, with prior exploration by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), at the Gynecology Department of the Poissy Teaching Hospital between May 2012 and August 2014. MRI data were retrospectively read by radiologists, without knowledge of the histology, and classified according to the criteria of the ADNEX MR score. The radiological presumption of benign or malignant mass was compared with the final histological diagnosis. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and ROC curve of the ADNEX MR score with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-forty-eight patients were included in the study of which 24 had malignant or borderline ovarian tumors. The proportion of malignant or borderline ovarian tumors in each class of the ADNEX MR score in our study was: ADNEX I: 0% (95%CI, 0-8); ADNEX II: 1.7% (95%CI, 0.04-8.9); ADNEX III: 7.7% (95%CI, 0.2-36); ADNEX IV: 57.1% (95%CI, 34.2-78.8) and ADNEX V: 100% (95%CI, 69.2-100). Thus, for an ADNEX MR score greater than or equal to 4, the sensitivity was 91.7% (95%CI, 73-99) and the specificity 92.7% (95%CI, 86.7-96.6) for the diagnosis of a malignant or borderline ovarian tumor. The area under the ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI%, 0.86-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI, coupled with the use of the ADNEX MR scoring system, can accurately classify adnexal masses into low-risk (ADNEX MR score <4) or high-risk (ADNEX MR score ≥4) group, thereby allowing for appropriate preoperative counseling and planning for surgery.