1
|
Mokry T, Mlynarska-Bujny A, Kuder TA, Hasse FC, Hog R, Wallwiener M, Dinkic C, Brucker J, Sinn P, Gnirs R, Kauczor HU, Schlemmer HP, Rom J, Bickelhaupt S. Ultra-High- b-Value Kurtosis Imaging for Noninvasive Tissue Characterization of Ovarian Lesions. Radiology 2020; 296:358-369. [PMID: 32544033 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Background MRI with contrast material enhancement is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. The role of diffusion-weighted MRI, however, remains controversial. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultra-high-b-value diffusion kurtosis MRI in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study evaluated consecutive women with sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses between November 2016 and December 2018. MRI at 3.0 T was performed, including diffusion-weighted MRI (b values of 0-2000 sec/mm2). Lesions were segmented on b of 1500 sec/mm2 by two readers in consensus and an additional independent reader by using full-lesion segmentations on a single transversal slice. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculation and kurtosis fitting were performed. Differences in ADC, kurtosis-derived ADC (Dapp), and apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp) between malignant and benign lesions were assessed by using a logistic mixed model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for ADC, Dapp, and Kapp to discriminate malignant from benign lesions was calculated, as was specificity at a sensitivity level of 100%. Results from two independent reads were compared. Histopathologic analysis served as the reference standard. Results A total of 79 ovarian lesions in 58 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 48 years ± 14) were evaluated. Sixty-two (78%) lesions showed benign and 17 (22%) lesions showed malignant histologic findings. ADC and Dapp were lower and Kapp was higher in malignant lesions: median ADC, Dapp, and Kapp were 0.74 µm2/msec (range, 0.52-1.44 µm2/msec), 0.98 µm2/msec (range, 0.63-2.12 µm2/msec), and 1.01 (range, 0.69-1.30) for malignant lesions, and 1.13 µm2/msec (range, 0.35-2.63 µm2/msec), 1.45 µm2/msec (range, 0.44-3.34 µm2/msec), and 0.65 (range, 0.44-1.43) for benign lesions (P values of .01, .02, < .001, respectively). AUC for Kapp of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.94) was higher than was AUC from ADC of 0.78 (95% confidence interval: 0.67, 0.89; P = .047). Conclusion Diffusion-weighted MRI by using quantitative kurtosis variables is superior to apparent diffusion coefficient values in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian lesions and might be of future help in clinical practice, especially in patients with contraindication to contrast media application. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Mokry
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Anna Mlynarska-Bujny
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Tristan Anselm Kuder
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Felix Christian Hasse
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Robert Hog
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Christine Dinkic
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Janina Brucker
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Peter Sinn
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Regula Gnirs
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Joachim Rom
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| | - Sebastian Bickelhaupt
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (T.M., F.C.H., H.U.K.); Department of Radiology (T.M., A.M.B., R.H., R.G., H.P.S., S.B.) and Department of Medical Physics in Radiology (A.M.B., T.A.K.), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.B.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (M.W., C.D., J.B.); Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (P.S.); Hospital for General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frankfurt Hoechst, Germany (J.R.); Junior Group Medical Imaging and Radiology-Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (R.H., S.B.); and Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lamos C, Mihaljevic C, Aulmann S, Bruckner T, Domschke C, Wallwiener M, Paringer C, Fluhr H, Schott S, Dinkic C, Brucker J, Golatta M, Gensthaler L, Eichbaum M, Sohn C, Rom J. Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0167386. [PMID: 27907089 PMCID: PMC5132291 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is a pre-malignant lesion, potentially leading to vaginal cancer. It is a rare disease, representing less than 1% of all intraepithelial neoplasia of the female genital tract. Similar to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), there are three different grades of VAIN. VAIN 1 is also known as a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), whereas VAIN 2 and VAIN 3 both represent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Risk factors for the development of VAIN are similar to those for cervical neoplasia, i.e. promiscuity, starting sexual activity at an early age, tobacco consumption and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). However, compared to other intraepithelial neoplasia such as CIN or VIN (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia), there still is little understanding about the natural course of VAIN and its capacity for pro- or regression. Furthermore, there is controversial data about the HPV detection rate in VAIN lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS 67 patients with histologically confirmed VAIN, who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 at the University Women´s Hospital of Heidelberg Germany, were included in this study. The biopsies of all participating patients were subjected to HPV genotyping. GP-E6/E7 Nested Multiplex PCR (NMPCR) was used to identify and genotype HPV. Eighteen pairs of type-specific nested PCR primers were assessed to detect the following "high-risk" HPV genotypes: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68, as well as the "low-risk" genotypes 6/11, 42, 43 and 44. The data was analyzed with the software SAS (Statistical Analysis System). RESULTS All 67 cases were eligible for DNA analysis. The median age was 53 years. The largest group with 53% (n = 36) was formed by women, who were first diagnosed with VAIN between the age of 41 to 60 years. 50% (n = 37) of the patients presented a VAIN in the upper 1/3 of the vagina. 58 (87%) were diagnosed with HSIL (VAIN). The median age in patients with LSIL (VAIN) was 53 years and in patients with HSIL (VAIN) 53.5 years. 12 women (18%) had an immunosuppression. HPV positivity was confirmed in 37 patients (55%). Except for a single patient, who had a triple infection with HPV types 6/11, 16 and 68, only infections with one single HPV genotype were detected. An infection with the HPV genotypes 31, 39, 45, 51, 58, 59, 66, 42, 43 and 44 couldn't be found in any of the patients. In 28 patients with diagnosed VAIN, an infection with HPV 16 could be shown, 24 (86%) of them were diagnosed with a HSIL (VAIN). 16 (24%) women presented condylomata and 13 of them (81%) had a positive HPV status. However, only 47% of the women without condylomata presented a positive HPV status, resulting in a significant correlation (p = 0.0164) between condylomata and HPV infection. In 28 of all 67 patients (42%), recurrence of the neoplasia occurred. CONCLUSION HPV 16 is the main virus-type to be associated with the development of a VAIN. Also, HPV 16 infection, VIN or condylomata acuminata in the past medical history seemed to be significant factors for early relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Lamos
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Charlotte Mihaljevic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Domschke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carmen Paringer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Herbert Fluhr
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Dinkic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Janina Brucker
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Eichbaum
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Rom
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|