Age dependence of spleen- and muscle-corrected hepatic signal enhancement on hepatobiliary phase gadoxetate MRI

Gender Differences in Pharmacokinetics: A Perspective on Contrast Agents

Gender is an important risk factor for adverse drug reactions. Women report significantly more adverse drug reactions than men. There is a growing consensus that gender differences in drug PK is a main contributor to higher drug toxicity in women. These differences stem from physiological differences (body composition, plasma protein concentrations, and liver and kidney function), drug interactions, and comorbidities. Contrast agents are widely used to enhance diagnostic performance in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Despite their broad use, these contrast agents can lead to important adverse reactions including hypersensitivity reactions, nephropathy, and hyperthyroidism. Importantly, female gender is one of the main risk factors for contrast agent toxicity. As these adverse reactions may be related to gender differences in PK, this perspective aims to describe distribution and elimination pathways of commonly used contrast agents and to critically discuss gender differences in these processes.

Comparison of gadolinium-based contrast agents for MR cholangiography in saline, blood and bile: a phantom study

BACKGROUND

We compared T1- and T2-weighted signal intensities of liver-specific (gadoxetate, gadobenate) and non-specific (gadoterate) gadolinium contrast agents (CAs) in a bile phantom.

METHODS

In a phantom study, gadoxetate, gadobenate, and gadoterate were diluted in saline, blood, and bile at different concentrations (0, 0.25, 0.5. 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 mM) and imaged in a 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system using T1- and T2-weighted sequences. The maximum signal intensities of CAs were compared for each sequence separately and across all T1-weighted sequences using one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Using T1-weighted sequences, CA concentration-dependent signal intensity increase was followed by decrease due to T2* effects. Comparing CAs for each sequence in bile yielded higher maximum signal intensities with gadobenate than gadoxetate and gadoterate using T1-weighted spin-echo (p < 0.010), multiecho gradient- and spin-echo (p < 0.001), and T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume excitation (eTHRIVE) sequences (p < 0.010). Comparing across all T1-weighted sequences in the bile phantom, gadobenate imaged using T1-weighted turbo field-echo (TFE) sequence showed the highest signal intensity, significantly higher than that using other CAs agents or sequences (p < 0.004) except for gadobenate and gadoxetate evaluated with three-dimensional multiecho fast field-echo (3D-mFFE) and gadoxetate with T1-weighted TFE sequence (p > 0.141). Signal reduction with CA concentration-dependent decrease was observed on T2-weighted images.

CONCLUSION

In this bile phantom study of gadolinium-based CA, gadobenate and gadoxetate showed high signal intensity with T1-weighted TFE and 3D-mFFE sequences, which supports their potential utility for contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography depends on contrast agent type, kinetics, and concentration in bile, • We compared signal intensities of three contrast agents in a bile phantom study. • Gadobenate, gadoxetate, and gadoterate demonstrated different signal intensities at identical concentrations. • Gadoxetate and gadobenate showed high signal intensities on T1-weighted MR sequences.

Addressing intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: how radiologists can make a difference

Faced with the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries both in Europe and across the world implemented strict stay-at-home orders. These measures helped to slow the spread of the coronavirus but also led to increased mental and physical health issues for the domestically confined population, including an increase in the occurrence of intimate partner violence (IPV) in many countries. IPV is defined as behavior that inflicts physical, psychological, or sexual harm within an intimate relationship. We believe that as radiologists, we can make a difference by being cognizant of this condition, raising an alert when appropriate and treating suspected victims with care and empathy. The aim of this Special Report is to raise awareness of IPV among radiologists and to suggest strategies by which to identify and support IPV victims. KEY POINTS: • The COVID-19 pandemic led to a marked increase in the number of intimate partner violence (IPV) cases, potentially leading to increased emergency department visits and radiological examinations. • Most IPV-related fractures affect the face, fingers, and upper trunk, and may easily be misinterpreted as routine trauma. • Radiologists should carefully review the medical history of suspicious cases, discuss the suspicion with the referring physician, and proactively engage in a private conversation with the patient, pointing to actionable resources for IPV victims.

Intimate partner violence crisis in the COVID-19 pandemic: how can radiologists make a difference?

• The COVID-19 crisis resulted in a variety of physical and mental health issues beyond the viral infection itself, as indicated by an increase in domestic violence.

• Radiologists should be aware of typical intimate partner violence (IPV) injury patterns, actively ask potential IPV victims about the cause of injury, and be familiar with support systems for IPV victims of their institutions.

• Emergency and radiology departments should review their protocols for identifying and supporting IPV victims, and train their staff to work together to implement these measures during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis.

Evaluating hepatotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents with gadoxetic-acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the hepatotoxicity of different chemotherapeutic agents used to treat neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) with gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 129 patients with NETs who underwent two or more serial gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI examinations between 2014 and 2018 and started chemotherapy in the beginning of that time period were retrospectively analysed. Linear mixed model analysis evaluating relative enhancement (RE) of the liver in the hepatobiliary phase with respect to time between MRI examinations, primary chemotherapy, hepatotoxicity score of preceding and subsequent chemotherapies as well as age and gender as fixed variables was performed. Binary logistic regression was used to verify whether the hepatotoxicity score predicts a significant impact of a chemotherapeutic regimen on RE and hence liver function.

RESULTS

Linear mixed model analysis of a total of 539 MRI examinations identified all chemotherapeutic agents with known hepatoxicity as a factor with a statistically significant negative impact on RE of the liver in gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI in addition to age. This result was confirmed by binary logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can be used as an imaging-based liver function test for assessing hepatotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents used for NETs. The findings underscore the known degrees of hepatotoxicity of the chemotherapeutic agents currently used in the treatment of NETs.

Consistency of hepatocellular gadoxetic acid uptake in serial MRI examinations for evaluation of liver function

PURPOSE

To assess the consistency of liver enhancement in gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over serial examinations.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 554 patients who underwent at least 2 serial gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI scans at either 1.5 or 3.0 Tesla at our institution between 2014 and 2018. Signal intensities (SI) were measured on T1-weighted images before and approx. 20 min after intravenous injection of gadoxetic acid. Relative enhancement (RE) of the liver, liver-to-spleen SI ratio (LSR), and liver-to-muscle SI ratio (LMR) were calculated. Means were compared with the paired t test, Greenhouse-Geisser test, and linear mixed model analysis, accordingly. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to elucidate possible predictors of RE and bivariate correlation analysis of patient age with RE was performed.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in RE, LSR, and LMR between two consecutive MRI scans was found when tested with paired t test or Greenhouse-Geisser test (n = 554, 519, and 554, respectively), while the latter revealed a statistically significant difference between the first and fourth MRI scan which was not confirmed in the linear mixed model. Patient age correlated negatively with RE of the liver (p = 0.002), LSR (p < 0.001), and LMR (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative enhancement of the liver in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is consistent over successive examinations, different scanner types, and field strengths while correlating negatively with age, which further underscores the validity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI as an imaging-based liver function test.

Effect of steatosis on liver signal and enhancement on multiphasic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of steatosis on liver signal and enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced (MCE) MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective, observational study, 1217 MCE abdominal MRIs performed during 2014 at a single institution were reviewed. Of these, 1085 were excluded, due to potential factors other than steatosis that may affect liver signal intensity and/or enhancement. In the remaining 132, liver fat fraction (FF) was calculated from the in- and opposed-phase 2D T1-weighted images. Liver signal intensity, absolute enhancement, and relative enhancement on fat-suppressed (Dixon method) 3D T1-weighted images before and after injection of gadobutrol (arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phases) were plotted against co-localized FF values and the linear trend was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient (r). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Liver signal intensity negatively correlated with FF for all phases (r = -0.388 to -0.544, p < 0.001). Absolute enhancement negatively correlated with FF for the portal venous and equilibrium phases (r = -0.286 and -0.289, respectively, p < 0.001), but not for the arterial phase (r = -0.042, p = 0.632). Relative enhancement did not significantly correlate with FF for any phase (p ≥ 0.125).

CONCLUSION

Steatosis reduces liver signal intensity in MCE MRI. This effect of steatosis was reduced in calculated absolute enhancement and eliminated in calculated relative enhancement.