Chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct invasion: is preprocedural biliary drainage mandatory?

Prediction Model of Survival in Unresectable HCC with Central Bile Duct Invasion Receiving TACE After Biliary Drainage: TEMP Score

Purpose

Central bile duct invasion (BDI) by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rare and associated with poor prognosis, lacking treatment guidelines. While transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is often used for unresectable cases, determining optimal candidates post-biliary drainage is controversial. We aim to develop a prognostic prediction model for unresectable HCC (uHCC) patients with central BDI receiving sequential TACE after successful biliary drainage.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 267 uHCC patients with central BDI receiving successful biliary drainage and sequential TACE from seven tertiary centers (2015-2021), divided into training (n=187) and validation (n=80) sets. Using Cox proportional-hazards regression model, we identified key prognostic indicators for overall survival (OS) and constructed a prediction model.

Results

Pre-TACE total bilirubin (TBil) values, extrahepatic spread (EHS), multiple intrahepatic tumors (MIT), and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) were identified as the significant clinical indicators for OS. These four parameters were included in a novel prediction model, named TEMP score, which could successfully categorize patients in the training set into three distinct risk grades with median OS of 26.9, 9.4, and 5.8 months, respectively. The TEMP score predicted the time-dependent areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for OS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of 0.813/0.907, 0.833/0.782, and 0.838/0.811 in the training and validation sets, with corresponding C-indices of 0.812/0.929, 0.829/0.761, and 0.818/0.791, respectively, outperforming other currently available models in both cohorts. The calibration curve of the model for predicting OS presented good consistency between observations and predictions in both the training set and validation set.

Conclusion

The TEMP score effectively stratifies the prognosis of uHCC patients with central BDI who have undergone successful bile drainage and sequential TACE, helping to identify those who may benefit from TACE treatment.

Effect of Biliary Drainage on the Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Bile Duct Invasion

Background/Aims

Bile duct invasion (BDI) is rarely observed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), leading to hyperbilirubinemia. However, the efficacy of pretreatment biliary drainage for HCC patients with BDI and obstructive jaundice is currently unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of biliary drainage on the prognosis of these patients.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled a total of 200 HCC patients with BDI from multicenter cohorts. Patients without obstructive jaundice (n=99) and those who did not undergo HCC treatment (n=37) were excluded from further analysis. Finally, 64 patients with obstructive jaundice (43 subjected to drainage and 21 not subjected to drainage) were included. Propensity score matching was then conducted.

Results

The biliary drainage group showed longer overall survival (median 10.13 months vs 4.43 months, p=0.004) and progression-free survival durations (median 7.00 months vs 1.97 months, p<0.001) than the non-drainage group. Multivariate analysis showed that biliary drainage was a significantly favorable prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.42; p=0.006) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.30; p<0.001). Furthermore, in the evaluation of first response after HCC treatment, biliary drainage was beneficial (p=0.005). Remarkably, the durations of overall survival (p=0.032) and progression-free survival (p=0.004) were similar after propensity score matching.

Conclusions

Biliary drainage is an independent favorable prognostic factor for HCC patients with BDI and obstructive jaundice. Therefore, biliary drainage should be contemplated in the treatment of advanced HCC with BDI to improve survival outcomes.

DEB-TACE versus cTACE for unresectable HCC with B1-type bile duct invasion after successful biliary drainage: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Given the lack of specific recommendations for conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) in patients having unresectable HCC with tumor infiltrating the common hepatic duct or the first-order branch of the bile ducts (B1-type bile duct invasion; B1-BDI) after biliary drainage, we retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of DEB-TACE with cTACE in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from five tertiary medical centers (January 2017-December 2021), we compared complications, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor response rate between patients having unresectable HCC with B1-BDI who underwent DEB-TACE or cTACE after successful biliary drainage. X-tile software calculated the pre-TACE total bilirubin (TBil) cutoff value, indicating optimal timing for sequential TACE after drainage. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed.

RESULTS

The study included 108 patients with unresectable HCC (B1-BDI) who underwent DEB-TACE and 114 who received cTACE as initial treatment. After PSM (n = 53 for each group), the DEB-TACE group had a longer TTP (8.9 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.038) and higher objective response rate (64.2% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.011) than did the cTACE group, although OS was comparable (16.7 vs. 15.3 months, p = 0.115). The DEB-TACE group exhibited fewer post-procedural increments in the mean albumin-bilirubin score, TBil, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), along with a significantly lower incidence of serious adverse events within 30 days (hepatic failure, ALT increase, and TBil increase) than the cTACE group (all p < 0.05). The pre-TACE TBil cutoff value was 99 μmol/L; patients with higher values (>99 μmol/L) had poorer OS in both groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE is safe and effective after successful biliary drainage in unresectable HCC with B1-BDI, potentially better than cTACE in terms of liver toxicity, TTP, and ORR. Lowering TBil below 99 μmol/L through successful drainage may create ideal conditions for sequential TACE.

Proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct invasion

AIM

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct invasion (BDI) (BDIHCC) has a poor prognosis. Moreover, due to the paucity of reports, there is no consensus regarding optimal management of this clinical condition yet. The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for BDIHCC.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2018, 15 patients with BDIHCC underwent PBT at our institution. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 4.0.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 23.4 months (range, 7.9-54.3). The median age was 71 years (range, 58-90 years). Many patients were Child A (n = 8, 53.3%) and most had solitary tumors (n = 11, 73.3%). Additionally, most patients had central type BDI (n = 11, 73%). The median tumor size was 4.0 cm (range, 1.5-8.0 cm). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 80.0%, 58.7% and 40.2%, respectively, and the corresponding LC and PFS rates were 93.3%, 93.3%, and 74.7% and 72.7%, 9.7%, and 0.0%, respectively. Acute grade 1/2 dermatitis (n = 7, 46.7%), and grades 2 (n = 1, 6.7%) and 3 (n = 1, 6.7%) cholangitis were observed. Late toxicities such as grade 3 gastric hemorrhage and pleural effusion were observed. No toxicities of grade 4 or higher were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PBT was feasible with tolerable toxicities for the treatment of BDIHCC.

Prediction of effective percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-central retrospective study

Background and aim

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) does not always lead to a reduction in serum total bilirubin (TBil) level in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and obstructive jaundice. We aimed to develop a model for pre-PTBD prediction of post-procedural TBil decrease in these patients.

Materials and methods

Retrospective database searches were conducted at four teaching hospitals (reference period: January 2010 to December 2018), and baseline characteristics of eligible patients were extracted. Any decrease in TBil after PTBD and the lowest level of TBil post-PTBD <5 mg/dL, 3 mg/dL, and 2 mg/dL were each taken as the standard of effectiveness for computation of its own predictive nomogram. For data dimension decrease and feature selection, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop nomograms. Each nomogram's performance was internally evaluated for its calibration, discriminative ability, and clinical usefulness.

Results

Included in the study were 138 patients. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, platelet count, and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) were predictors in the nomogram for any decrease in TBil; international normalized ratio (INR), MELD score, platelet count, and PVT were predictors for a decrease to <5 mg/dL; MELD score, cholinesterase level (CHE), platelet count, and PVT were predictors for a decrease to <3 mg/dL; and MELD score, CHE, platelet count, and pre-albumin level were predictors for a decrease to <2 mg/dL. The clinical value of the nomograms was proven by decision curve analysis.

Conclusions

These models may help inform clinical decision making for performing PTBD procedures.

Proton Beam Therapy in Managing Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bile Duct Invasion

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct invasion is a rare and notorious subtype of HCC. This study included patients that had unresectable HCC with bile duct invasion and proton beam therapy between November 2015 and February 2021. Twenty patients fit the inclusion criteria. The median tumor size was 6.3 cm. Nine patients (45.0%) had major vascular invasions. All included patients received the radiation dose of 72.6 gray relative biological effectiveness due to the proximity of porta hepatis and tumor. The median follow-up time was 19.9 months. The median overall survival was 19.9 months among deceased patients. The 1-year cumulative local recurrence rates were 5.3%, with only two patients developing in-field failure. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 79.4% and 53.3%. The 1-year progression-free survival was 58.9%. Four patients developed radiation-induced liver disease. The 1-year cholangitis-free survival was 55.0%. Skin toxicity was the most common acute toxicity and rarely severe. Eight patients developed ≤ grade 3 gastrointestinal ulcers. Proton beam therapy offers desirable survival outcomes for unresectable HCC patients with bile duct invasion. Optimal local tumor control could also be obtained within acceptable toxicities.

Obstructive Jaundice Following Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bile Duct Invasion

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct invasion is considered rare. A case in which a fragment of intraductal tumor dropped into the common bile duct after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and caused abdominal pain, and obstructive jaundice secondary to biliary obstruction is presented. This case was successfully managed by emergent endoscopic sphincterotomy. Physicians should recognize one of the complications due to TACE for HCC with intraductal tumor invasion.

Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bile Duct Invasion

INTRODUCTION

Because the frequency of bile duct invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is very rare, there is limited clinical evidence to demonstrate the outcomes of systemic therapy in HCC with bile duct invasion.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to clarify the efficacy and safety of sorafenib treatment in patients with unresectable advanced HCC with bile duct invasion.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-five patients with advanced HCC were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of sorafenib between patients without bile duct invasion [B (-) group, n = 165] and those with bile duct invasion [B (+) group, n = 10].

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and the confirmed disease control (DC) rate between the B (-) and the B (+) groups (13.9 vs. 20.0%, p = 0.637 for ORR; 47.2 vs. 70.0%, p = 0.202 for DC rate, respectively). There were no significant differences in median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) between the B (-) group and the B (+) group (14.8 vs. 14.1 months, p = 0.780 for OS; 3.4 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.277 for TTP, respectively). Post-treatment factors associated with good OS were changes in albumin-bilirubin score (0-6 weeks) of <0.25, and antitumor response at 6 weeks of DC. Though 5 of 10 patients (50%) in the B (+) group had bile duct complications, such as obstructive jaundice and biliary bleeding, these 5 patients were able to recover from biliary troubles by careful and vigorous management with biliary endoscopic intervention, and were able to continue sorafenib therapy safely.

CONCLUSIONS

Our present results suggest that sorafenib might have potential therapeutic efficacy and safety in advanced HCC patients with bile duct invasion. In case of biliary tract troubles before and during sorafenib treatment, early biliary management may be important to continue sorafenib therapy safely. Further studies are needed to confirm the outcomes of sorafenib in advanced HCC patients with bile duct invasion.

Selective Chemoembolization of Caudate Lobe Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Anatomy and Procedural Techniques

Transarterial chemoembolization is the most common treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). However, when an HCC is located in the caudate lobe, many interventional radiologists are reluctant to perform chemoembolization and percutaneous ablation owing to the tumor's complex vascular supply and deep location. With the advent of C-arm CT, rendering the three-dimensional display of the hepatic artery and detecting the tumor-feeding vessels are possible and can help guide interventional radiologists to the tumor. The common origins of the caudate artery include the right hepatic artery, left hepatic artery, right anterior hepatic artery, and right posterior hepatic artery. The origins of the tumor-feeding arteries of a caudate lobe HCC can vary depending on the tumor's subsegmental location. Caudate lobe HCCs are commonly fed by multiple caudate arteries that are connected. In addition, extrahepatic collateral arteries frequently supply recurrent tumors in the caudate lobe. The caudate artery can supply portal vein thrombi or biliary tumor thrombi in patients with HCC. Several techniques such as preshaping the microcatheter or using the shepherd's hook technique are needed to catheterize the caudate artery in complex cases. Although uncommon, bile duct stricture is a serious complication following selective chemoembolization through the caudate artery. Identification and catheterization of the caudate artery have become possible in most patients by using C-arm CT and a fine microcatheter system, respectively. The authors review the anatomy of the caudate artery with C-arm CT and describe basic technical considerations in selective chemoembolization for caudate lobe HCCs. Unusual circumstances that require catheterization and techniques used for catheterizing the caudate artery are also described. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2019.