Histogram analysis of amide proton transfer–weighted imaging: comparison of glioblastoma and solitary brain metastasis in enhancing tumors and peritumoral regions

Volumetric histogram analysis of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for predicting complete tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the potential of histogram analysis applied to pre-treatment amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging in predicting complete pathological regression (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled LARC patients who underwent preoperative rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Based on histologic assessment, the patients were divided into a pathological complete response (pCR) group or a non-pCR group. APTw histogram features, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and clinical parameters were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman rank correlation, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. The predictive performances of different models were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

RESULTS

One-hundred forty-five patients were included (mean age, 61.6 years ± 11.8 [SD]; 87 men). pCR patients exhibited lower pre-treatment ADC value, higher pre-treatment APTw-10%, APTw-90%, minimum, maximum, median, mean, range, and root mean square (RMS) of the primary tumor compared to non-pCR patients (all p < 0.05). APTw-10%, APTw-90%, maximum, mean, median, minimum, range, and RMS showed negative correlations with the tumor regression grade (TRG) category (r ranged between -0.457 and -0.173; all p < 0.005). Skewness, kurtosis, and entropy exhibited positive correlations with the TRG category (r = 0.278, 0.319, and 0.324, respectively; all p < 0.05). The combined model had a higher AUC of 0.930, with 93.9% sensitivity and 83.9% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Histogram analysis of pre-treatment APTw may hold promise as a novel approach for predicting the response of LARC patients to nCRT.

KEY POINTS

Question Predicting response to nCRT is crucial for early stratified management of LARC patients; however, current radiological studies remain inconclusive. Finding LARC patients with pCR is correlated with higher pre-treatment APTw intensity-related and lower shape-related histogram features. Clinical relevance The APTw-histogram model and the APTw-clinical combined model demonstrated strong diagnostic efficacy and clinical practicality in predicting LARC patients' responsiveness to nCRT, offering new insights for early clinical decision-making.

3-Tesla amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APT-WI): elevated signal also in tumor mimics

OBJECTIVES

To explore amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTwi) for the initial classification of brain masses in clinical practice by systematically reporting APTwi signal intensity (APT-SI) in tumor mimics and brain tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective analysis (2017-2020) of APTwi in 156 patients (84 men, mean age: 50.9 ± 20) who underwent characterization imaging of a brain mass prior to any treatment, using 3-Tesla MRI. 125/156 (80%) patients presented with brain tumor and 31/156 (20%) with tumor mimics. Regions of interest were manually drawn on 2D axial slices by two readers on APTwi map in lesional and perilesional areas and APT-SI, corresponding to the Magnetization Transfer Ratio asymmetry at 3.5 ppm, was systematically reported. Student's t-test or Wilcoxon-test were used to compare groups of patients.

RESULTS

The mean APT-SI in lesional and perilesional areas were significantly higher in tumors compared to tumor mimics: 3% [2.10-4] (median [Q1-Q3]) vs 1.7% [0.80-2.55] (p < 0.001) and 1.9% [1.2-2.80] vs. 1.0% [0.55-2.3] (p < 0.01). There were no differences in mean APT-SI in the tumor core between low and high-grade tumors: 2.5% [1.80-4.0] vs. 3.25% [2.5-4.0]. The mean APT-SI was significantly higher in high-grade glioma compared to low-grade glioma: 3.4% [2.7-4] vs. 2.1% [1.7-2.5] (p < 0.001). Highest mean APT-SI in tumor core were found in mesenchymal tumors (5.83% ± 1.45, mean ± SD), embryonal tumors (5.27% ± 3.5) and meningiomas (4.28% ± 0.70). In tumor mimics, highest mean APT-SI was found in the core of infectious lesions (3.52% ± 0.67).

CONCLUSION

High signal on ATPwi is not exclusive to high-grade brain tumors but can be observed in some tumor mimics and subtypes of low-grade tumors.

KEY POINTS

Question What is the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTwi) in the setting of brain mass classification? Findings High APT-signal intensity in the tumor core of a brain mass could correspond to a high- or low-grade tumor or tumor mimic. Clinical relevance In patients presenting for the initial classification of brain masses, APTwi findings should be interpreted with caution and in conjunction with other MRI parameters, as a high APTwi signal does not necessarily indicate a high-grade tumor.

Differentiation between glioblastoma and solitary brain metastases using perfusion and amide proton transfer weighted MRI

Objectives

Early diagnostic separation between glioblastoma (GBM) and solitary metastases (MET) is important for patient management but remains challenging when based on imaging only. The objective of this study was to assess whether amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) MRI alone or combined with dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI parameters, including cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and leakage parameter (K2) measurements, can differentiate GBM from MET.

Methods

APTw MRI and DSC-MRI were performed on 18 patients diagnosed with GBM (N = 10) or MET (N = 8). Quantitative parameter maps were calculated, and regions-of-interest (ROIs) were placed in whole tumor, contrast-enhanced tumor (ET), edema, necrosis and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM). The mean and max of the APTw signal, CBF, leakage-corrected CBV and K2 were obtained from each ROI. Except for K2, all were normalized to NAWM (nAPTwmean/max, nCBFmean/max, ncCBVmean/max,). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were assessed for different parameter combinations. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

When comparing GBM to MET, nAPTmax, nCBFmax, ncCBVmax and ncCBVmean were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in ET with AUC being 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, and 0.83, respectively. Combinations of nAPTwmax + ncCBVmax, nAPTwmean + ncCBVmean, nAPTwmax + nCBFmax, nAPTwmax + K2max and nAPTwmax + ncCBVmax + K2max in ET showed significant prediction in differentiating GBM and MET (AUC = 0.92, 0.82, 0.92, 0.85, and 0.92 respectively).

Conclusion

When assessed in Gd-enhanced tumor areas, nAPTw MRI signal intensity alone or combined with DSC-MRI parameters, was an excellent predictor for differentiating GBM and MET. However, the small cohort warrants future studies.

[Brain metastases]

Cerebral metastases in patients with metastatic lung cancer are found in more than 30% of patients at baseline and manifest themselves in two out of three patients during disease evolution. For a long time, the cerebral manifestation of the disease was classified as prognostically unfavorable and hence such patients were regularly excluded from therapy studies. In the context of targeted molecular therapy strategies and established immuno-oncological systemic therapies, the blood-brain barrier no longer represents an insurmountable barrier. However, the treatment of brain metastases requires decision making in a multidisciplinary team within dedicated lung cancer and/or oncology centers. The differentiated treatment decision is based on the number, size and location of the brain metastases, neurology and general condition, comorbidities, potential life expectancy and the patient's wishes, but also tumor biology including molecular targets, extra-cranial tumor burden and availability of a CNS-effective therapy. Systemic therapies as well as neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic concepts are now often combined for optimized and prognosis-improving therapeutic strategies.

Advances in diffuse glioma assessment: preoperative and postoperative applications of chemical exchange saturation transfer

Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) is a technique that uses specific off-resonance saturation pulses to pre-saturate targeted substances. This process influences the signal intensity of free water, thereby indirectly providing information about the pre-saturated substance. Among the clinical applications of CEST, Amide Proton Transfer (APT) is currently the most well-established. APT can be utilized for the preoperative grading of gliomas. Tumors with higher APTw signals generally indicate a higher likelihood of malignancy. In predicting preoperative molecular typing, APTw values are typically lower in tumors with favorable molecular phenotypes, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, compared to IDH wild-type tumors. For differential diagnosis, the average APTw values of meningiomas are significantly lower than those of high-grade gliomas. Various APTw measurement indices assist in distinguishing central nervous system lesions with similar imaging features, such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, central nervous system lymphoma, solitary brain metastases, and glioblastoma. Regarding prognosis, APT effectively differentiates between tumor recurrence and treatment effects, and also possesses predictive capabilities for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Differentiation of glioma and solitary brain metastasis: a multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging study using histogram analysis

BACKGROUND

Differentiation of glioma and solitary brain metastasis (SBM), which requires biopsy or multi-disciplinary diagnosis, remains sophisticated clinically. Histogram analysis of MR diffusion or molecular imaging hasn't been fully investigated for the differentiation and may have the potential to improve it.

METHODS

A total of 65 patients with newly diagnosed glioma or metastases were enrolled. All patients underwent DWI, IVIM, and APTW, as well as the T1W, T2W, T2FLAIR, and contrast-enhanced T1W imaging. The histogram features of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI, slow diffusion coefficient (Dslow), perfusion fraction (frac), fast diffusion coefficient (Dfast) from IVIM, and MTRasym@3.5ppm from APTWI were extracted from the tumor parenchyma and compared between glioma and SBM. Parameters with significant differences were analyzed with the logistics regression and receiver operator curves to explore the optimal model and compare the differentiation performance.

RESULTS

Higher ADCkurtosis (P = 0.022), frackurtosis (P<0.001),and fracskewness (P<0.001) were found for glioma, while higher (MTRasym@3.5ppm)10 (P = 0.045), frac10 (P<0.001),frac90 (P = 0.001), fracmean (P<0.001), and fracentropy (P<0.001) were observed for SBM. frackurtosis (OR = 0.431, 95%CI 0.256-0.723, P = 0.002) was independent factor for SBM differentiation. The model combining (MTRasym@3.5ppm)10, frac10, and frackurtosis showed an AUC of 0.857 (sensitivity: 0.857, specificity: 0.750), while the model combined with frac10 and frackurtosis had an AUC of 0.824 (sensitivity: 0.952, specificity: 0.591). There was no statistically significant difference between AUCs from the two models. (Z = -1.14, P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

The frac10 and frackurtosis in enhanced tumor region could be used to differentiate glioma and SBM and (MTRasym@3.5ppm)10 helps improving the differentiation specificity.

Radiomics Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: Distinguishing Between Glioblastoma and Single Brain Metastasis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI)-based radiomics models in differentiating glioblastoma (GB) from single brain metastasis (SBM) and compare their diagnostic performance with that of routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 110 patients who underwent DKI and were pathologically diagnosed with GB (n = 58) or SBM (n = 52) were enrolled in this study. Radiomics features were extracted from the manually delineated region of interest of the lesion. A training set for model development was constructed from the images of 88 random patients, and 22 patients were reserved for independent validation. Seven single-DKI-parametric models and a multi-DKI-parametric model were constructed using six classifiers, whereas four single-routine-sequence models (based on T2 weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, T2-dark-fluid, and contrast-enhanced T1 magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo) and a multisequence routine MRI model were constructed for comparison. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic performance. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of different models were compared using the DeLong test.

RESULTS

The AUCs of the single-DKI-parametric models ranged from 0.800 to 0.933 (mean kurtosis [MK] model). The multi-DKI-parametric model had a slightly higher AUC (0.958) than the MK model; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.688). In comparison, the AUCs of the routine MRI models ranged from 0.633 to 0.733 (multisequence routine MRI model). The AUC of the multi-DKI-parametric model was significantly higher than that of the multisequence routine MRI model (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

The multi-DKI-parametric radiomics model exhibited better performance than that of the single-DKI-parametric models and routine MRI models in distinguishing GB from SBM.

Arterial Spin Labeling and Amide Proton Transfer Imaging can Differentiate Glioblastoma from Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, arterial spin labeling (ASL) and amide proton transfer (APT) imaging have shown potential for distinguishing glioblastoma from brain metastases. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to investigate this further.

METHODS

An extensive and comprehensive search was conducted in 6 English and Chinese databases according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, encompassing data up to July 2023. Data from eligible literature were extracted, and bivariate models were employed to calculate pooled sensitivities, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 11 articles. For ASL, the pooled sensitivity was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.87), and the pooled specificity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.93). The pooled PLR was 5.89 (95% CI, 2.97-11.69), the pooled NLR was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.15-0.47), the pooled DOR was 22.33 (95% CI, 6.89-72.34), and AUC was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92). For APT imaging, the pooled sensitivity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.85), and the pooled specificity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92). The pooled PLR was 5.51 (95% CI, 3.24-9.37), the pooled NLR was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.17-0.37), the pooled DOR was 21.99 (95% CI, 10.28-47.03), and the AUC was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggest that both ASL and APT imaging exhibit high accuracy in distinguishing between glioblastoma and brain metastasis.

Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Fibrosarcoma Xenograft Models: Whole-Tumor Histogram Analysis of DWI and IVIM

RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVE

To explore the correlations of histogram parameters from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) with the heterogeneous features in a nude mouse model of fibrosarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 44 fibrosarcoma xenograft models were established by inoculating HT-1080 cells on the right thigh of mice and subjected tumors to DWI and IVIM imaging with 3.0 T MRI. Whole-tumor histogram parameters were calculated on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f). Heterogeneous features, including necrosis rate, cell density, Ki-67 labeling index (LI), and microvascular density (MVD) were measured. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Pearson or Spearman correlation tests, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were performed.

RESULTS

The 90th percentile, skewness and kurtosis of ADC and D histograms showed correlations with necrosis rate, and the highest correlation coefficient was found for D90th (r = 0.485). ADC and D histogram parameters showed correlations with cell density and Ki-67 LI; D90th showed the highest correlation coefficient with cell density (r = -0.504); and Dmedian showed the most significant correlation with Ki-67 LI (r = -0.525). D*skewness, D*kurtosis, D*90th, fmean, and fmedian showed correlations with MVD. ADC90th, ADCskewness, ADCkurtosis, D90th, and Dskewness showed significant differences between the low necrosis and high necrosis groups, and the combination model showed the best diagnostic ability (AUC = 0.882), with 97% sensitivity, and 72.7% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Whole-tumor histogram parameters of DWI and IVIM were correlated with heterogeneous features in nude murine models of fibrosarcoma.

Differentiating brain metastasis from glioblastoma by time-dependent diffusion MRI

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to investigate the use of time-dependent diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in distinguishing between glioblastomas and brain metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted involving 65 patients with glioblastomas and 27 patients with metastases using a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence with oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE, 50 Hz) and a conventional pulsed gradient spin-echo (PGSE, 0 Hz) sequence. In addition to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from two sequences (ADC50Hz and ADC0Hz), we generated maps of the ADC change (cADC): ADC50Hz - ADC0Hz and the relative ADC change (rcADC): (ADC50Hz - ADC0Hz)/ ADC0Hz × 100 (%).

RESULTS

The mean and the fifth and 95th percentile values of each parameter in enhancing and peritumoral regions were compared between glioblastomas and metastases. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of the best discriminating indices were compared. In enhancing regions, none of the indices of ADC0Hz and ADC50Hz showed significant differences between metastases and glioblastomas. The mean cADC and rcADC values of metastases were significantly higher than those of glioblastomas (0.24 ± 0.12 × 10-3mm2/s vs. 0.14 ± 0.03 × 10-3mm2/s and 23.3 ± 9.4% vs. 14.0 ± 4.7%; all p < 0.01). In peritumoral regions, no significant difference in all ADC indices was observed between metastases and glioblastomas. The AUC values for the mean cADC (0.877) and rcADC (0.819) values in enhancing regions were significantly higher than those for ADC0Hz5th (0.595; all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The time-dependent diffusion MRI parameters may be useful for differentiating brain metastases from glioblastomas.

Combining amide proton transfer-weighted and arterial spin labeling imaging to differentiate solitary brain metastases from glioblastomas

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical utility of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTw) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) in differentiating solitary brain metastases (SBMs) from glioblastomas (GBMs).

METHODS

Forty-eight patients diagnosed with brain tumors were enrolled. All patients underwent conventional MRI, APTw, and ASL scans on a 3.0 T MRI system. The mean APTw value and mean cerebral blood flow (CBF) value were measured. The differences in various parameters between GBMs and SBMs were assessed using the independent-samples t-test. The quantitative performance of these MRI parameters in distinguishing between GBMs and SBMs was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

GBMs exhibited significantly higher APTw and CBF values in peritumoral regions compared with SBMs (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between SBMs and GBMs in tumor cores. APTw MRI had a higher diagnostic efficiency in differentiating SBMs from GBMs (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.864; 75.0% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity). Combined use of APTw and CBF value increased the AUC to 0.927.

CONCLUSION

APTw may be superior to ASL for distinguishing between SBMs and GBMs. Combination of APTw and ASL showed better discrimination and a superior diagnostic performance.

Altered amide proton transfer weighted and diffusion signals in patients with multiple sclerosis: correlation with neurofilament light chain and disease duration

Objectives

To compare the signal alterations of amide proton transfer (APT), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fractional anisotropy (FA) in white matter (WM) lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS), compared with healthy controls (HCs), and to investigate the relationships between these changes and clinical measurements such as serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL).

Materials and methods

Twenty-nine patients with relapsing-remitting MS (21 females and 8 males) and 30 HCs (23 females and 7 males) were recruited. APT-weighted (APTw) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data were acquired using a 3.0-T magnetic resonance system. APTw and DTI images were registered to FLAIR-SPIR images and assessed by two neuroradiologists. MTRasym (3.5 ppm), ADC, FA values for MS and HC are calculated using mean values from all regions of interest (ROI). The ROI criteria were: (1) for MS patients, ROI were defined as MS lesions, and each lesion was identified. (2) The WM around each HC's lateral ventricle (frontal lobe, parietal lobe, and centrum semiovale) was assessed bilaterally. The diagnostic efficacy of MTRasym (3.5 ppm), ADC, and FA in the lesions of MS patients was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The associations between MTRasym (3.5 ppm), ADC, and FA values and the clinical measurements were investigated further.

Results

The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and ADC values of brain lesions were increased, while FA values were decreased in patients with MS. The diagnostic area under curve (AUC) of MTRasym (3.5 ppm), ADC, and FA value was 0.891 (95% CI: 0.813, 0.970), 0.761 (95% CI: 0.647, 0.875) and 0.970 (95% CI: 0.924, 1.0), respectively. sNfL was considerably positively correlated with MTRasym (3.5 ppm) (P = 0.043, R = 0.38) and disease durations were significantly negatively correlated with FA (P = 0.046, R = -0.37).

Conclusion

Amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) and DTI are potential imaging methods for assessing brain lesions in patients with MS at the molecular and microscopic levels, respectively. The association between APTw, DTI parameters and clinical factors implies that they may play a role in disease damage monitoring.

Amide Proton Transfer-Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging of Intracranial Brain Tumors and Tumor-like Lesions: Our Experience and a Review

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is a molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method that can generate image contrast based on the proton exchange between labeled protons in solutes and free, bulk water protons. Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging is the most frequently reported amide-proton-based CEST technique. It generates image contrast by reflecting the associations of mobile proteins and peptides resonating at 3.5 ppm downfield from water. Although the origin of the APT signal intensity in tumors is unclear, previous studies have suggested that the APT signal intensity is increased in brain tumors due to the increased mobile protein concentrations in malignant cells in association with an increased cellularity. High-grade tumors, which demonstrate a higher proliferation than low-grade tumors, have higher densities and numbers of cells (and higher concentrations of intracellular proteins and peptides) than low-grade tumors. APT-CEST imaging studies suggest that the APT-CEST signal intensity can be used to help differentiate between benign and malignant tumors and high-grade gliomas and low-grade gliomas as well as estimate the nature of lesions. In this review, we summarize the current applications and findings of the APT-CEST imaging of various brain tumors and tumor-like lesions. We report that APT-CEST imaging can provide additional information on intracranial brain tumors and tumor-like lesions compared to the information provided by conventional MRI methods, and that it can help indicate the nature of lesions, differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, and determine therapeutic effects. Future research could initiate or improve the lesion-specific clinical applicability of APT-CEST imaging for meningioma embolization, lipoma, leukoencephalopathy, tuberous sclerosis complex, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and hippocampal sclerosis.

Whole-tumor amide proton transfer-weighted imaging histogram analysis to predict pathological extramural venous invasion in rectal adenocarcinoma: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw)-derived whole-tumor histogram analysis parameters in predicting pathological extramural venous invasion (pEMVI) positive status of rectal adenocarcinoma (RA).

METHODS

Preoperative MR including APTw imaging of 125 patients with RA (mean 61.4 ± 11.6 years) were retrospectively analyzed. Two radiologists reviewed each case's EMVI status based on the MR-based modified 5-point scale system with conventional MR images. The APTw histogram parameters of primary tumors were obtained automatically using whole-tumor volume histogram analysis. The independent risk factors markedly correlated with pEMVI-positive status were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Diagnosis performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The AUCs were compared using the Delong method.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis demonstrated that MR-tumor (T) stage, MR-lymph node (N) stage, APTw-10%, APTw-90%, interquartile range, APTw-minimum, APTw-maximum, APTw-mean, APTw-median, entropy, kurtosis, mean absolute deviation (MAD), and robust MAD were significantly related to pEMVI-positive status (all p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that MR-T stage (OR = 4.864, p = 0.018), MR-N stage (OR = 4.967, p = 0.029), interquartile range (OR = 0.892, p = 0.037), APT-minimum (OR = 1.046, p = 0.031), entropy (OR = 11.604, p = 0.006), and kurtosis (OR = 1.505, p = 0.007) were the independent risk factors enabling prediction of pEMVI-positive status. The AUCs for diagnostic ability of conventional MRI assessment, the APTw histogram model, and the combined model (including APTw histogram and clinical variables) were 0.785, 0.853, and 0.918, respectively. The combined model outperformed the APTw histogram model (p = 0.013) and the conventional MRI assessment (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-tumor histogram analysis of APTw images combined with clinical factors showed better diagnosis efficiency in predicting EMVI involvement in RA.

KEY POINTS

• Rectal adenocarcinomas with pEMVI-positive status are typically associated with higher APTw-SI values. • APTw-minimum, interquartile range, entropy, kurtosis, MR-T stage, and MR-N stage are the independent risk factors for EMVI involvement. • The best prediction for EMVI involvement was obtained with a combined model of APTw histogram and clinical variables (area under the curve, 0.918).

Evaluation of Brain Tumors Using Amide Proton Transfer Imaging: A Comparison of Normal Amide Proton Transfer Signal With Abnormal Amide Proton Transfer Signal Value

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship of amide proton transfer (APT) signal characteristics in brain tumors and uninvolved brain tissue for patients with glioblastoma and those with brain metastases.

METHODS

Using the mDIXON 3D-APT sequence of the fast spin echo method, an APT image was obtained. The mean APT signal values of tumor core, peritumor edema, ipsilateral normal-appearing white matter (INAWM), and contralateral normal white matter (CNAWM) were obtained and compared between glioblastoma and brain metastases. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate parameters for distinguishing between glioblastoma and brain metastases. In addition, the difference and change rate in APT signal values between tumor core and peritumoral edema (PE) and CNAWM were evaluated, respectively.

RESULTS

The APT signal values of glioblastoma were the highest in tumor core (3.41% ± 0.49%), followed by PE (2.24% ± 0.29%), INAWM (1.35% ± 0.15%), and CNAWM (1.26% ± 0.12%, P < 0.001). The APT signal value of brain metastases was the highest in tumor core (2.74% ± 0.34%), followed by PE (1.86% ± 0.35%), INAWM (1.17% ± 0.13%), and CNAWM (1.2% ± 0.09%, P < 0.01). The APT change rate (between PE and CNAWM) was not significantly different at 78% and 56% for glioblastoma and brain metastases, respectively ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing APT imaging under the same parameters used in this study may aid in the identification of brain tumors.

Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Brain Metastases by MRI-Based Oxygen Metabolomic Radiomics and Deep Learning

Glioblastoma (GB) and brain metastasis (BM) are the most frequent types of brain tumors in adults. Their therapeutic management is quite different and a quick and reliable initial characterization has a significant impact on clinical outcomes. However, the differentiation of GB and BM remains a major challenge in today's clinical neurooncology due to their very similar appearance in conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Novel metabolic neuroimaging has proven useful for improving diagnostic performance but requires artificial intelligence for implementation in clinical routines. Here; we investigated whether the combination of radiomic features from MR-based oxygen metabolism ("oxygen metabolic radiomics") and deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can support reliably pre-therapeutic differentiation of GB and BM in a clinical setting. A self-developed one-dimensional CNN combined with radiomic features from the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO₂) was clearly superior to human reading in all parameters for classification performance. The radiomic features for tissue oxygen saturation (mitoPO₂; i.e., tissue hypoxia) also showed better diagnostic performance compared to the radiologists. Interestingly, both the mean and median values for quantitative CMRO₂ and mitoPO₂ values did not differ significantly between GB and BM. This demonstrates that the combination of radiomic features and DL algorithms is more efficient for class differentiation than the comparison of mean or median values. Oxygen metabolic radiomics and deep neural networks provide insights into brain tumor phenotype that may have important diagnostic implications and helpful in clinical routine diagnosis.

Histogram Analysis Based on Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density MR Imaging for Differentiation Between Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Brain Metastasis and Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Two ROI Placements

BACKGROUND

Preoperative differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and solitary brain metastasis (SBM) contributes to guide neurosurgical decision-making.

PURPOSE

To explore the value of histogram analysis based on neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) in differentiating between GBM and SBM and comparison of the diagnostic performance of two region of interest (ROI) placements.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

In all, 109 patients with GBM (n = 57) or SBM (n = 52) were enrolled.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T scanners. T₂ -dark-fluid sequence, contrast-enhanced T₁ magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence, and NODDI.

ASSESSMENT

ROIs were placed on the peritumoral edema area (ROI1) and whole tumor area (ROI2, included the cystic, necrotic, and hemorrhagic areas). Histogram parameters of each isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF), intracellular volume fraction (ICVF), and orientation dispersion index (ODI) from NODDI images for two ROIs were calculated, respectively.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Mann-Whitney U test, independent t-test, chi-square test, multivariate logistic regression analysis, DeLong's test.

RESULTS

For the ROI1 and ROI2, the ICVF_min and ODI_mean obtained the highest area under curve (AUC, AUC = 0.741 and 0.750, respectively) compared to other single parameters, and the AUC of the multivariate logistic regression model was 0.851 and 0.942, respectively. DeLong's test revealed significant difference in diagnostic performance between optimal single parameter and multivariate logistic regression model within the same ROI, and the multivariate logistic regression models between two different ROIs.

DATA CONCLUSION

The performance of multivariate logistic regression model is superior to optimal single parameter in both ROIs based on NODDI histogram analysis to distinguish SBM from GBM, and the ROI placed on the whole tumor area exhibited better diagnostic performance.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Differentiation of hemangioblastoma from brain metastasis using MR amide proton transfer imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Differentiation between hemangioblastoma and brain metastasis remains a challenge in neuroradiology using conventional MRI. Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging can provide unique molecular information. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of APT imaging in differentiating hemangioblastomas from brain metastases and compare APT imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 11 patients with hemangioblastoma and 20 patients with brain metastases. Region-of-interest analyses were employed to obtain the mean, minimum, and maximum values of APT signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and these indices were compared between hemangioblastomas and brain metastases using the unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Their diagnostic performances were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the ROC curve (AUC). AUCs were compared using DeLong's method.

RESULTS

All MRI-derived indices were significantly higher in hemangioblastoma than in brain metastasis. ROC analysis revealed the best performance with APT-related indices (AUC = 1.000), although pairwise comparisons showed no significant difference between the mean ADC and mean rCBV.

CONCLUSIONS

APT imaging is a useful and robust imaging tool for differentiating hemangioblastoma from metastasis.

Neuroimaging at 7 Tesla: a pictorial narrative review

Neuroimaging using the 7-Tesla (7T) human magnetic resonance (MR) system is rapidly gaining popularity after being approved for clinical use in the European Union and the USA. This trend is the same for functional MR imaging (MRI). The primary advantages of 7T over lower magnetic fields are its higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios, which provide high-resolution acquisitions and better contrast, making it easier to detect lesions and structural changes in brain disorders. Another advantage is the capability to measure a greater number of neurochemicals by virtue of the increased spectral resolution. Many structural and functional studies using 7T have been conducted to visualize details in the white matter and layers of the cortex and hippocampus, the subnucleus or regions of the putamen, the globus pallidus, thalamus and substantia nigra, and in small structures, such as the subthalamic nucleus, habenula, perforating arteries, and the perivascular space, that are difficult to observe at lower magnetic field strengths. The target disorders for 7T neuroimaging range from tumoral diseases to vascular, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. MR spectroscopy has also been used for research because of its increased chemical shift that separates overlapping peaks and resolves neurochemicals more effectively at 7T than a lower magnetic field. This paper presents a narrative review of these topics and an illustrative presentation of images obtained at 7T. We expect 7T neuroimaging to provide a new imaging biomarker of various brain disorders.

Molecular Imaging of Brain Tumors and Drug Delivery Using CEST MRI: Promises and Challenges

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detects molecules in their natural forms in a sensitive and non-invasive manner. This makes it a robust approach to assess brain tumors and related molecular alterations using endogenous molecules, such as proteins/peptides, and drugs approved for clinical use. In this review, we will discuss the promises of CEST MRI in the identification of tumors, tumor grading, detecting molecular alterations related to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), assessment of treatment effects, and using multiple contrasts of CEST to develop theranostic approaches for cancer treatments. Promising applications include (i) using the CEST contrast of amide protons of proteins/peptides to detect brain tumors, such as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and low-grade gliomas; (ii) using multiple CEST contrasts for tumor stratification, and (iii) evaluation of the efficacy of drug delivery without the need of metallic or radioactive labels. These promising applications have raised enthusiasm, however, the use of CEST MRI is not trivial. CEST contrast depends on the pulse sequences, saturation parameters, methods used to analyze the CEST spectrum (i.e., Z-spectrum), and, importantly, how to interpret changes in CEST contrast and related molecular alterations in the brain. Emerging pulse sequence designs and data analysis approaches, including those assisted with deep learning, have enhanced the capability of CEST MRI in detecting molecules in brain tumors. CEST has become a specific marker for tumor grading and has the potential for prognosis and theranostics in brain tumors. With increasing understanding of the technical aspects and associated molecular alterations detected by CEST MRI, this young field is expected to have wide clinical applications in the near future.

The Value of APTw CEST MRI in Routine Clinical Assessment of Human Brain Tumor Patients at 3T

Background. With fast-growing evidence in literature for clinical applications of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), this prospective study aimed at applying amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) CEST imaging in a clinical setting to assess its diagnostic potential in differentiation of intracranial tumors at 3 tesla (T). Methods. Using the asymmetry magnetization transfer ratio (MTRasym) analysis, CEST signals were quantitatively investigated in the tumor areas and in a similar sized region of the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) on the contralateral hemisphere of 27 patients with intracranial tumors. Area under curve (AUC) analyses were used and results were compared to perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI). Results. Using APTw CEST, contrast-enhancing tumor areas showed significantly higher APTw CEST metrics than contralateral NAWM (AUC = 0.82; p < 0.01). In subgroup analyses of each tumor entity vs. NAWM, statistically significant effects were yielded for glioblastomas (AUC = 0.96; p < 0.01) and for meningiomas (AUC = 1.0; p < 0.01) but not for lymphomas as well as metastases (p > 0.05). PWI showed results comparable to APTw CEST in glioblastoma (p < 0.01). Conclusions. This prospective study confirmed the high diagnostic potential of APTw CEST imaging in a routine clinical setting to differentiate brain tumors.

Histogram analysis based on diffusion kurtosis imaging: Differentiating glioblastoma multiforme from single brain metastasis and comparing the diagnostic performance of two region of interest placements

PURPOSE

To assess the value of histogram analysis, using diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), in differentiating glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) from single brain metastasis (SBM) and to compare the diagnostic efficiency of different region of interest (ROI) placements.

METHOD

Sixty-seven patients with histologically confirmed GBM (n = 35) and SBM (n = 32) were recruited. Two ROIs-the contrast-enhanced area and whole-tumor area-were delineated across all slices. Eleven histogram parameters of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and mean kurtosis (MK) from both ROIs were calculated. All histogram parameter values were compared between GBM and SBM, using the Mann-Whitney U test. The accuracies of different histogram parameters were compared using the McNemar test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to assess the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

In the contrast-enhanced area, FA₁₀, FA₂₅, FA₇₅, FA₉₀, FA_mean, FA_median, FA_max, MD_max, MD_skewness, and MK_skewness were significantly higher for GBM than for SBM. FA_skewness was significantly lower for GBM than for SBM. FA₂₅ (0.815) had the highest area under the curve (AUC). In the whole-tumor area, FA₁₀, FA₂₅, FA₇₅, FA₉₀, FA_SD, FA_mean, FA_median, FA_max, MD_max, MD_skewness, and MK_skewness were significantly higher for GBM than for SBM. FA_median (0.805) had the highest AUC. The accuracy of FA₂₅ in the contrast-enhanced area was significantly higher than that of the FA_median in the whole-tumor area.

CONCLUSIONS

GBM and SBM can be differentiated using the DKI-based histogram analysis. Placing the ROI on the contrast-enhanced area results in better discrimination.

A Multiparametric MR-Based RadioFusionOmics Model with Robust Capabilities of Differentiating Glioblastoma Multiforme from Solitary Brain Metastasis

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a novel RFO model in differentiating GBM and SBM with multiparametric MR sequences collected from 244 (131 GBM and 113 SBM) patients. Three basic volume of interests (VOIs) were delineated on the conventional axial MR images (T1WI, T2WI, T2_FLAIR, and CE_T1WI), including volumetric non-enhanced tumor (nET), enhanced tumor (ET), and peritumoral edema (pTE). Using the RFO model, radiomics features extracted from different multiparametric MRI sequence(s) and VOI(s) were fused and the best sequence and VOI, or possible combinations, were determined. A multi-disciplinary team (MDT)-like fusion was performed to integrate predictions from the high-performing models for the final discrimination of GBM vs. SBM. Image features extracted from the volumetric ET (VOIET) had dominant predictive performances over features from other VOI combinations. Fusion of VOIET features from the T1WI and T2_FLAIR sequences via the RFO model achieved a discrimination accuracy of AUC = 0.925, accuracy = 0.855, sensitivity = 0.856, and specificity = 0.853, on the independent testing cohort 1, and AUC = 0.859, accuracy = 0.836, sensitivity = 0.708, and specificity = 0.919 on the independent testing cohort 2, which significantly outperformed three experienced radiologists (p = 0.03, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.01, and p = 0.02, 0.01, 0.45, and 0.02, respectively) and the MDT-decision result of three experienced experts (p = 0.03, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.02, and p = 0.03, 0.02, 0.44, and 0.03, respectively).

Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MRI Might Help Distinguish Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment From a Normal Elderly Population

Objectives: To evaluate whether 3D amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging based on magnetization transfer analysis can be used as a novel imaging marker to distinguish amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients from the normal elderly population by measuring changes in APTw signal intensity in the hippocampus and amygdala. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients with aMCI and 74 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were recruited for routine MRI and APT imaging examinations. Magnetic transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) of the amide protons (at 3.5 ppm), or APTw values, were measured in the bilateral hippocampus and amygdala on three consecutive cross-sectional APT images and were compared between the aMCI and control groups. The independent sample t-test was used to evaluate the difference in APTw values of the bilateral hippocampus and amygdala between the aMCI and control groups. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of the APTw. The paired t-test was used to assess the difference in APTw values between the left and right hippocampus and amygdala, in both the aMCI and control groups. Results: The APTw values of the bilateral hippocampus and amygdala in the aMCI group were significantly higher than those in the control group (left hippocampus 1.01 vs. 0.77% p < 0.001; right hippocampus 1.02 vs. 0.74%, p < 0.001; left amygdala 0.98 vs. 0.70% p < 0.001; right amygdala 0.94 vs. 0.71%, p < 0.001). The APTw values of the left amygdala had the largest AUC (0.875) at diagnosis of aMCI. There was no significant difference in APTw values between the left and right hippocampus and amygdala, in either group. (aMCI group left hippocampus 1.01 vs. right hippocampus 1.02%, p = 0.652; healthy control group left hippocampus 0.77 vs. right hippocampus 0.74%, p = 0.314; aMCI group left amygdala 0.98 vs. right amygdala 0.94%, p = 0.171; healthy control group left amygdala 0.70 vs. right amygdala 0.71%, p = 0.726). Conclusion: APTw can be used as a new imaging marker to distinguish aMCI patients from the normal elderly population by indirectly reflecting the changes in protein content in the hippocampus and amygdala.

Differentiation Between Glioblastoma Multiforme and Metastasis From the Lungs and Other Sites Using Combined Clinical/Routine MRI Radiomics

Background

Differentiation between cerebral glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and solitary brain metastasis (MET) is important. The existing radiomic differentiation method ignores the clinical and routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features.

Purpose

To differentiate between GBM and MET and between METs from the lungs (MET-lung) and other sites (MET-other) through clinical and routine MRI, and radiomics analyses.

Methods and Materials

A total of 350 patients were collected from two institutions, including 182 patients with GBM and 168 patients with MET, which were all proven by pathology. The ROI of the tumor was obtained on axial postcontrast MRI which was performed before operation. Seven radiomic feature selection methods and four classification algorithms constituted 28 classifiers in two classification strategies, with the best classifier serving as the final radiomics model. The clinical and combination models were constructed using the nomograms developed. The performance of the nomograms was evaluated in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. Student’s t-test or the chi-square test was used to assess the differences in the clinical and radiological characteristics between the training and internal validation cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the performance of developed models with the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

The classifier fisher_decision tree (fisher_DT) showed the best performance (AUC: 0.696, 95% CI:0.608-0.783) for distinguishing between GBM and MET in internal validation cohorts; the classifier reliefF_random forest (reliefF_RF) showed the best performance (AUC: 0.759, 95% CI: 0.613-0.904) for distinguishing between MET-lung and MET-other in internal validation cohorts. The combination models incorporating the radiomics signature and clinical-radiological characteristics were superior to the clinical-radiological models in the two classification strategies (AUC: 0.764 for differentiation between GBM in internal validation cohorts and MET and 0.759 or differentiation between MET-lung and MET-other in internal validation cohorts). The nomograms showed satisfactory performance and calibration and were considered clinically useful, as revealed in the decision curve analysis.

Data Conclusion

The combination of radiomic and non-radiomic features is helpful for the differentiation among GBM, MET-lung, and MET-other.

Advanced MRI assessment of non-enhancing peritumoral signal abnormality in brain lesions

Evaluation of Central Nervous System (CNS) focal lesions has been classically made focusing on the assessment solid or enhancing component. However, the assessment of solitary peripherally enhancing lesions where the differential diagnosis includes High-Grade Gliomas (HGG) and metastasis, is usually challenging. Several studies have tried to address the characteristics of peritumoral non-enhancing areas, for better characterization of these lesions. Peritumoral hyperintense T2/FLAIR signal abnormality predominantly contains infiltrating tumor cells in HGG whereas CNS metastasis induce pure vasogenic edema. In addition, the accurate determination of the real extension of HGG is critical for treatment selection and outcome. Conventional MRI sequences are limited in distinguishing infiltrating neoplasm from vasogenic edema. Advanced MRI sequences like Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI), Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), Perfusion Weighted Imaging (PWI) and MR spectroscopy (MRS) have all been utilized for this aim with acceptable results. Other advanced MRI approaches, less explored for this task such as Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL), Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI), T2 relaxometry or Amide Proton Transfer (APT) are also showning promising results in this scenario. In this article, we will discuss the physiopathological basis of peritumoral T2/FLAIR signal abnormality and review potential applications of advanced MRI sequences for its evaluation.

A radiomics-based model to differentiate glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases

AIM

To differentiate glioblastoma (GBM) from solitary brain metastases (MET) using radiomic analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-three patients with solitary brain tumours (157 GBM and 98 solitary brain MET) were split into a training cohort (n=178) and a validation cohort (n=77) by stratified sampling using computer-generated random numbers at a ratio of 7:3. After feature extraction, minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to build the radiomics signature on the training cohort and validation cohort. Performance was assessed by radiomics score (Rad-score), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

Eleven radiomic features were selected as significant features in the training cohort. The Rad-score was significantly associated with the differentiation between GBM and solitary brain MET (p<0.001) both in the training and validation cohorts. The radiomics signature yielded area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.82 and 0.81 in the training and validation cohorts to distinguish between GBM and solitary brain MET.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics model might be a useful supporting tool for the preoperative differentiation of GBM from solitary brain MET, which could aid pretreatment decision-making.

Physiological MRI Biomarkers in the Differentiation Between Glioblastomas and Solitary Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

Glioblastomas (GB) and solitary brain metastases (BM) are the most common brain tumors in adults. GB and BM may appear similar in conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). Their management strategies, however, are quite different with significant consequences on clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a previously presented physiological MRI approach scoping to obtain quantitative information about microvascular architecture and perfusion, neovascularization activity, and oxygen metabolism to differentiate GB from BM.

PROCEDURES

Thirty-three consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, untreated, and histopathologically confirmed GB or BM were preoperatively examined with our physiological MRI approach as part of the cMRI protocol.

RESULTS

Physiological MRI biomarker maps revealed several significant differences in the pathophysiology of GB and BM: Central necrosis was more hypoxic in GB than in BM (30 %; P = 0.036), which was associated with higher neovascularization activity (65 %; P = 0.043) and metabolic rate of oxygen (48 %; P = 0.004) in the adjacent contrast-enhancing viable tumor parts of GB. In peritumoral edema, GB infiltration caused neovascularization activity (93 %; P = 0.018) and higher microvascular perfusion (30 %; P = 0.022) associated with higher tissue oxygen tension (33 %; P = 0.020) and lower oxygen extraction from vasculature (32 %; P = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

Our physiological MRI approach, which requires only 7 min of extra data acquisition time, might be helpful to noninvasively distinguish GB and BM based on pathophysiological differences. However, further studies including more patients are required.

The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects

The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases (BM) consists of surgical resection, different radiation treatment modalities, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and targeted molecular treatment. This review presents the current state of neurosurgical technology applied to achieve maximal resection with minimal morbidity as a treatment paradigm in patients with BM. In addition, we discuss the contribution of neurosurgical resection on functional outcome, advanced systemic treatment strategies, and enhanced understanding of the tumor biology.

Amide Proton Transfer Weighted Imaging Shows Differences in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions and White Matter Hyperintensities of Presumed Vascular Origin

Objectives: To assess the ability of 3D amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging based on magnetization transfer analysis to discriminate between multiple sclerosis lesions (MSL) and white matter hyperintensities of presumed vascular origin (WMH) and to compare APTw signal intensity of healthy white matter (healthy WM) with APTw signal intensity of MSL and WHM. Materials and Methods: A total of 27 patients (16 female, 11 males, mean age 39.6 years) with multiple sclerosis, 35 patients (17 females, 18 males, mean age 66.6 years) with small vessel disease (SVD) and 20 healthy young volunteers (9 females, 11 males, mean age 29 years) were included in the MSL, the WMH, and the healthy WM group. MSL and WMH were segmented on fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images underlaid onto APTw images. Histogram parameters (mean, median, 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th percentile) were calculated. Mean APTw signal intensity values in healthy WM were defined by "Region of interest" (ROI) measurements. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses of clustered data were applied. Results: All histogram parameters except the 75 and 90th percentile were significantly different between MSL and WMH (p = 0.018-p = 0.034). MSL presented with higher median values in all parameters. The histogram parameters offered only low diagnostic performance in discriminating between MSL and WMH. The 10th percentile yielded the highest diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.6245 (95% CI: [0.532, 0.717]). Mean APTw signal intensity values of MSL were significantly higher than mean values of healthy WM (p = 0.005). The mean values of WMH did not differ significantly from the values of healthy WM (p = 0.345). Conclusions: We found significant differences in APTw signal intensity, based on straightforward magnetization transfer analysis, between MSL and WMH and between MSL and healthy WM. Low AUC values from ROC analyses, however, suggest that it may be challenging to determine type of lesion with APTw imaging. More advanced analysis of the APT CEST signal may be helpful for further differentiation of MSL and WMH.