Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prediction of histologic types in solid lung lesions using preoperative contrast-enhanced CT

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop and validate a predicting model for the histologic classification of solid lung lesions based on preoperative contrast-enhanced CT.

METHODS

A primary dataset of 1012 patients from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (TMUCIH) was randomly divided into a development cohort (708) and an internal validation cohort (304). Patients from the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (SHSMU) were set as an external validation cohort (212). Two clinical factors (age, gender) and twenty-one characteristics on contrast-enhanced CT were used to construct a multinomial multivariable logistic regression model for the classification of seven common histologic types of solid lung lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the diagnostic performance of the model in the development and validation cohorts, separately.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis showed that two clinical factors and twenty-one characteristics on contrast-enhanced CT were predictive in lung lesion histologic classification. The mean AUC of the proposed model for histologic classification was 0.95, 0.94, and 0.92 in the development, internal validation, and external validation cohort, respectively. When determining the malignancy of lung lesions based on histologic types, the mean AUC of the model was 0.88, 0.86, and 0.90 in three cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that by utilizing both clinical and CT characteristics on contrast-enhanced CT images, the proposed model could not only effectively stratify histologic types of solid lung lesions, but also enabled accurate assessment of lung lesion malignancy. Such a model has the potential to avoid unnecessary surgery for patients and to guide clinical decision-making for preoperative treatment.

KEY POINTS

• Clinical and CT characteristics on contrast-enhanced CT could be used to differentiate histologic types of solid lung lesions. • Predicting models using preoperative contrast-enhanced CT could accurately assessment of tumor malignancy based on predicted histologic types.

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Convolutional Neural Network Assessment of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Compared With PET With CT Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging

BACKGROUND

Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) measuring 8 to 30 mm in diameter require further workup to determine the likelihood of malignancy.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the diagnostic performance of a lung cancer prediction convolutional neural network (LCP-CNN) in SPNs using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT imaging compared with the current clinical workup?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the Single Pulmonary Nodule Investigation: Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography in the Characterisation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules trial, a prospective multicenter study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT imaging with PET imaging in SPNs. The LCP-CNN was designed and validated in an external cohort. LCP-CNN-generated risk scores were created from the noncontrast and contrast-enhanced CT scan images from the DCE CT imaging. The gold standard was histologic analysis or 2 years of follow-up. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated using LCP-CNN score, maximum standardized uptake value, and DCE CT scan maximum enhancement and were compared using the DeLong test.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy participants (mean ± SD age, 68.3 ± 8.8 years; 49% women) underwent PET with CT scan imaging and DCE CT imaging with CT scan data available centrally for LCP-CNN analysis. The accuracy of the LCP-CNN on the noncontrast images (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88) was superior to that of DCE CT imaging (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82; P = .03) and equal to that of PET with CT scan imaging (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.90; P = .35). The presence of contrast resulted in a small reduction in diagnostic accuracy, with the AUC falling from 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88) on the noncontrast images to 0.80 to 0.83 after contrast (P < .05 for 240 s after contrast only).

INTERPRETATION

An LCP-CNN algorithm provides an AUC equivalent to PET with CT scan imaging in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier; No.: NCT02013063.

Value of dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography in the diagnosis of benign/malignant solid solitary pulmonary nodules and establishment of a prediction model

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the role of spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) quantitative parameters and their derived quantitative parameters combined with lesion morphological information in the differential diagnosis of solid SPNs.

Methods

This retrospective study included basic clinical data and SDCT images of 132 patients with pathologically confirmed SPNs (102 and 30 patients in the malignant and benign groups, respectively). The morphological signs of SPNs were evaluated and the region of interest (ROI) was delineated from the lesion to extract and calculate the relevant SDCT quantitative parameters, and standardise the process. Differences in qualitative and quantitative parameters between the groups were statistically analysed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the efficacy of the corresponding parameters in the diagnosis of benign and malignant SPNs. Statistically significant clinical data, CT signs and SDCT quantitative parameters were analysed using multivariate logistic regression to determine the independent risk factors for predicting benign and malignant SPNs, and the best multi-parameter regression model was established. Inter-observer repeatability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.

Results

Malignant SPNs differed from benign SPNs in terms of size, lesion morphology, short spicule sign, and vascular enrichment sign (P< 0.05). The SDCT quantitative parameters and their derived quantitative parameters of malignant SPNs (SAR_40keV, SAR_70keV, Δ_40keV, Δ_70keV, CER_40keV, CER_70keV, NEF_40keV, NEF_70keV, λ, NIC, NZ_eff) were significantly higher than those of benign SPNs (P< 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, most parameters could distinguish between benign and adenocarcinoma groups (SAR_40keV, SAR_70keV, Δ_40keV, Δ_70keV, CER_40keV, CER_70keV, NEF_40keV, NEF_70keV, λ, NIC, and NZ_eff), and between benign and squamous cell carcinoma groups (SAR_40keV, SAR70_keV, Δ_40keV, Δ_70keV, NEF_40keV, NEF_70keV, λ, and NIC). However, there were no significant differences between the parameters in the adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma groups. ROC curve analysis indicated that NIC, NEF_70keV, and NEF_40keV had higher diagnostic efficacy for differentiating benign and malignant SPNs (area under the curve [AUC]:0.869, 0.854, and 0.853, respectively), and NIC was the highest. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that size (OR=1.138, 95% CI 1.022-1.267, P=0.019), Δ_70keV (OR=1.060, 95% CI 1.002-1.122, P=0.043), and NIC (OR=7.758, 95% CI 1.966-30.612, P=0.003) were independent risk factors for the prediction of benign and malignant SPNs. ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of size, Δ_70keV, NIC, and a combination of the three for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SPNs were 0.636, 0.846, 0.869, and 0.903, respectively. The AUC for the combined parameters was the largest, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.2%, 83.3% and 86.4%, respectively. The SDCT quantitative parameters and their derived quantitative parameters in this study exhibited satisfactory inter-observer repeatability (ICC: 0.811-0.997).

Conclusion

SDCT quantitative parameters and their derivatives can be helpful in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid SPNs. The quantitative parameter, NIC, is superior to the other relevant quantitative parameters and when NIC is combined with lesion size and Δ_70keV value for comprehensive diagnosis, the efficacy could be further improved.

Preoperative prediction of the degree of differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma presenting as sub-solid or solid nodules with a radiomics nomogram

AIM

To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram for prediction of degree of differentiation in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as sub-solid or solid nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 438 patients with histopathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma (248 non-poorly differentiated and 190 poorly differentiated) were divided into training cohort (n=235) and internal validation cohort (n=203) according to surgery sequence. Sixty patients form public TCIA dataset were selected for external validation. One thousand, two hundred and eighteen radiomics features were extracted from each volumetric region of interest and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was applied to select meaningful radiomic features for building a radiomics score (Rad-score) model. A nomogram model incorporating the Rad-score and type was established after multivariable logistic regression. The discrimination efficiency, calibration efficacy, and clinical utility value of the nomogram were evaluated.

RESULTS

The Rad-score model could predict the differentiation degree of lung adenocarcinoma with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.89) in the internal validation cohort. The AUC of the nomogram and radiographic model was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.84) in the internal validation cohort respectively. The AUC of the nomogram in the external validation cohort was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.88). Delong's test showed that the nomogram performed better than radiographic features alone (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed radiomics nomogram has the potential to predict the differentiation degree of lung adenocarcinoma preoperatively.

Predictive model for the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, multiple predictive models have been developed with the goal of reliably differentiating between solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) that are malignant and those that are benign. The present meta-analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic utility of these predictive models in the context of SPN differential diagnosis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched for relevant studies published through August 31, 2021. Pooled data analyses were conducted using Stata v12.0.

RESULTS

In total, 20 retrospective studies that included 5171 SPNs (malignant/benign: 3662/1509) were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Respective pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic score values were 88% (95CI%: 0.84-0.91), 78% (95CI%: 0.74-0.80), 3.91 (95CI%: 3.42-4.46), 0.16 (95CI%: 0.12-0.21), and 3.21 (95CI%: 2.87-3.55), with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve value of 86% (95CI%: 0.83-0.89). Significant heterogeneity among studies was detected with respect to sensitivity (I² = 89.07%), NLR (I² = 87.29%), and diagnostic score (I² = 72.28%). In a meta-regression analysis, sensitivity was found to be impacted by the standard reference in a given study (surgery and biopsy vs. surgery only, P = 0.02), while specificity was impacted by whether studies were blinded (yes vs. unclear, P = 0.01). Sensitivity values were higher when surgery and biopsy samples were used as a standard reference, while unclear blinding status was associated with increased specificity. No significant evidence of publication bias was detected for the present meta-analysis (P = 0.539).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that predictive models can offer significant diagnostic utility when establishing whether SPNs are malignant or benign.

Comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules

INTRODUCTION

Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) have a high reported accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of these.

METHODS

In this prospective multicentre trial, 380 participants with an SPN (8-30 mm) and no recent history of malignancy underwent DCE-CT and PET/CT. All patients underwent either biopsy with histological diagnosis or completed CT follow-up. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy for PET/CT and DCE-CT. Costs and cost-effectiveness were estimated from a healthcare provider perspective using a decision-model.

RESULTS

312 participants (47% female, 68.1±9.0 years) completed the study, with 61% rate of malignancy at 2 years. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values for DCE-CT were 95.3% (95% CI 91.3 to 97.5), 29.8% (95% CI 22.3 to 38.4), 68.2% (95% CI 62.4% to 73.5%) and 80.0% (95% CI 66.2 to 89.1), respectively, and for PET/CT were 79.1% (95% CI 72.7 to 84.2), 81.8% (95% CI 74.0 to 87.7), 87.3% (95% CI 81.5 to 91.5) and 71.2% (95% CI 63.2 to 78.1). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for DCE-CT and PET/CT was 0.62 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.67) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85), respectively (p<0.001). Combined results significantly increased diagnostic accuracy over PET/CT alone (AUROC=0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.93), p<0.001). DCE-CT was preferred when the willingness to pay per incremental cost per correctly treated malignancy was below £9000. Above £15 500 a combined approach was preferred.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT has a superior diagnostic accuracy to DCE-CT for the diagnosis of SPNs. Combining both techniques improves the diagnostic accuracy over either test alone and could be cost-effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02013063.

Calcification sign for prediction of benignity in pulmonary nodules: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The calcification sign assessed by computed tomography appears to be a potential marker for benignities among patients diagnosed with pulmonary nodules (PNs). The following meta-analysis has been purposefully designed to figure-out the diagnostic value of the calcification signature as a way of identifying benignities from PNs.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed were considered as a reference to obtain the required data from January 2000 until October 2020. Stata v12.0 was used as a standard tool for statistical assessment.

RESULTS

Eleven retrospective studies were assessed via this meta-analysis, which included 6136 PNs (1827 benign and 4309 malignant). The pooled diagnostic odd ratios, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), sensitivity and specificity were 6.79, 6.06, 0.89, 13% and 98%, respectively. The value obtained for the area under the curve was 0.65, showing moderate overall diagnostic accuracy. A significant heterogeneity was found while calculating the pooled sensitivity (I²  = 85.5%), specificity (I²  = 75.0%), PLR (I²  = 59.0%), NLR (I²  = 79.5%) and DOR (I²  = 100.0%) in the current analysis. Sub-group analyses presented better PLR and specificity values for the study with a sample size ≥ 400. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test detected no potential evidence of significant publication bias (p = 0.091).

CONCLUSIONS

Calcification signs have been identified as moderate regulators corresponding to overall diagnostic performance (via marking a distinct differentiation between malignant and benign) for PNs. However, the manifestation of the calcification sign had a good directive property for benign PNs.

Clinical Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Resection of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules and Influencing Factors in the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Nodules

Purpose

This is a retrospective research comparing the clinical outcomes of single-hole versus multi-hole video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical (VATS) resection for solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) and examining the factors influencing the diagnosis of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.

Method

We collected the clinical data, surgical status, outcomes, and corresponding imaging features of 317 patients with SPN who were surgically resected by VATS and diagnosed as benign or malignant by pathology in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021.

Result

Among the 317 patients, 124 (39.12%) underwent single-port VATS and 193 (60.88%) underwent multiple-hole VATS. All patients were grouped according to the different surgical methods, and their postoperative indicators were statistically analyzed. The results showed that neither the single-port VATS group nor the multi-port VATS group had any serious adverse events such as death during the perioperative period. The average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage tube indwelling time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly lower in the two groups. Statistics of postoperative pathological diagnosis showed that 98 cases (30.91%) of all nodules were benign nodules and 219 cases (69.09%) were malignant nodules, and a further single-multivariate analysis showed that age, nodule maximum diameter, lobular sign, burr sign, vascular cluster sign, and pleural depression sign were independent relevant factors for the diagnosis of benign and malignant nodules.

Conclusion

VATS is less invasive and has fewer complications and is of great clinical value for both diagnosis and treatment of benign and malignant SPN. Age, maximum nodal diameter, lobar sign, burr sign, vascular set sign, and pleural depression sign were independent correlates affecting the diagnosis of benign and malignant SPN, which reminds that great attention should be paid to patients who are older and have risk factors on imaging, and early and timely active treatment or close follow-up should be carried out.

Computed tomography-based spiculated sign for prediction of malignancy in lung nodules: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT)-based spiculated sign is a risk factor for malignancy in patients with lung nodules (LNs). The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of CT-based spiculated sign as a means of differentiating between malignant and benign LNs.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were reviewed from January 2000 to March 2020 for eligible studies. Stata v12.0 was used to conduct this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 19 retrospective studies for inclusion in this meta-analysis. These studies compiled data pertaining to 8549 LNs (5547 malignant and 3003 benign). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were 0.51 (95% CI: 0.36-0.65), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.91), 3.15 (95% CI: 2.34-4.23), 0.59 (95% CI: 0.47-0.73) and 5.36 (95% CI: 3.93-7.31), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.76. Significant heterogeneity was detected among these studies with respect to sensitivity (I² = 98.4%, P = .00), specificity (I² = 95.8%, P = .00), PLR (I² = 78.9%, P = .00), NLR (I² = 99.3%, P = .00) and DOR (I² = 100%, P = .00). A meta-regression analysis revealed that the country in which a study was conducted (China vs Not China) had a strong influence on reported sensitivity and specificity. No significant publication bias was detected via Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test (P = .191).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-based spiculated sign can achieve moderate diagnostic performance as a means of differentiating between malignant and benign LNs.