Differentiation of predominant subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma using a quantitative radiomics approach on CT

Computed tomography-based 3D convolutional neural network deep learning model for predicting micropapillary or solid growth pattern of invasive lung adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning (DL) model to predict the presence of micropapillary or solid (M/S) growth pattern in invasive lung adenocarcinoma (ILADC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2019 to October 2022, 617 patients with ILADC who underwent preoperative chest CT scans in our institution were randomly placed into training and internal validation sets in a 4:1 ratio, and 353 patients with ILADC from another institution were included as an external validation set. Then, a self-paced learning (SPL) 3D Net was used to establish two DL models: model 1 was used to predict the M/S growth pattern in ILADC, and model 2 was used to predict that pattern in ≤ 2-cm-diameter ILADC.

RESULTS

For model 1, the training cohort's area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score were 0.924, 0.845, 0.851, 0.842, and 0.843; the internal validation cohort's were 0.807, 0.744, 0.756, 0.750, and 0.743; and the external validation cohort's were 0.857, 0.805, 0.804, 0.806, and 0.804, respectively. For model 2, the training cohort's AUC, accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score were 0.946, 0.858, 0.881,0.844, and 0.851; the internal validation cohort's were 0.869, 0.809, 0.786, 0.794, and 0.790; and the external validation cohort's were 0.831, 0.792, 0.789, 0.790, and 0.790, respectively. The SPL 3D Net model performed better than the ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNeXt50, and DenseNet121 models.

CONCLUSION

The CT-based DL model performed well as a noninvasive screening tool capable of reliably detecting and distinguishing the subtypes of ILADC, even in small-sized tumors.

An Integrated Clinical and Computerized Tomography-Based Radiomic Feature Model to Separate Benign from Malignant Pleural Effusion

INTRODUCTION

Distinguishing between malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and benign pleural effusion (BPE) poses a challenge in clinical practice. We aimed to construct and validate a combined model integrating radiomic features and clinical factors using computerized tomography (CT) images to differentiate between MPE and BPE.

METHODS

A retrospective inclusion of 315 patients with pleural effusion (PE) was conducted in this study (training cohort: n = 220; test cohort: n = 95). Radiomic features were extracted from CT images, and the dimensionality reduction and selection processes were carried out to obtain the optimal radiomic features. Logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest were employed to construct radiomic models. LR analyses were utilized to identify independent clinical risk factors to develop a clinical model. The combined model was created by integrating the optimal radiomic features with the independent clinical predictive factors. The discriminative ability of each model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Out of the total 1,834 radiomic features extracted, 15 optimal radiomic features explicitly related to MPE were picked to develop the radiomic model. Among the radiomic models, the SVM model demonstrated the highest predictive performance [area under the curve (AUC), training cohort: 0.876, test cohort: 0.774]. Six clinically independent predictive factors, including age, effusion laterality, procalcitonin, carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), were selected for constructing the clinical model. The combined model (AUC: 0.932, 0.870) exhibited superior discriminative performance in the training and test cohorts compared to the clinical model (AUC: 0.850, 0.820) and the radiomic model (AUC: 0.876, 0.774). The calibration curves and DCA further confirmed the practicality of the combined model.

CONCLUSION

This study presented the development and validation of a combined model for distinguishing MPE and BPE. The combined model was a powerful tool for assisting in the clinical diagnosis of PE patients.

Prediction of solid and micropapillary components in lung invasive adenocarcinoma: radiomics analysis from high-spatial-resolution CT data with 1024 matrix

PURPOSE

To predict solid and micropapillary components in lung invasive adenocarcinoma using radiomic analyses based on high-spatial-resolution CT (HSR-CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this retrospective study, 64 patients with lung invasive adenocarcinoma were enrolled. All patients were scanned by HSR-CT with 1024 matrix. A pathologist evaluated subtypes (lepidic, acinar, solid, micropapillary, or others). Total 61 radiomic features in the CT images were calculated using our modified texture analysis software, then filtered and minimized by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select optimal radiomic features for predicting solid and micropapillary components in lung invasive adenocarcinoma. Final data were obtained by repeating tenfold cross-validation 10 times. Two independent radiologists visually predicted solid or micropapillary components on each image of the 64 nodules with and without using the radiomics results. The quantitative values were analyzed with logistic regression models. The receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to predict of solid and micropapillary components. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Two features (Coefficient Variation and Entropy) were independent indicators associated with solid and micropapillary components (odds ratio, 30.5 and 11.4; 95% confidence interval, 5.1-180.5 and 1.9-66.6; and P = 0.0002 and 0.0071, respectively). The area under the curve for predicting solid and micropapillary components was 0.902 (95% confidence interval, 0.802 to 0.962). The radiomics results significantly improved the accuracy and specificity of the prediction of the two radiologists.

CONCLUSION

Two texture features (Coefficient Variation and Entropy) were significant indicators to predict solid and micropapillary components in lung invasive adenocarcinoma.

PET/CT-based deep learning grading signature to optimize surgical decisions for clinical stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma and biologic basis under its prediction: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

No consensus on a grading system for invasive lung adenocarcinoma had been built over a long period of time. Until October 2020, a novel grading system was proposed to quantify the whole landscape of histologic subtypes and proportions of pulmonary adenocarcinomas. This study aims to develop a deep learning grading signature (DLGS) based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to personalize surgical treatments for clinical stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma and explore the biologic basis under its prediction.

METHODS

A total of 2638 patients with clinical stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma from 4 medical centers were retrospectively included to construct and validate the DLGS. The predictive performance of the DLGS was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), its potential to optimize surgical treatments was investigated via survival analyses in risk groups defined by the DLGS, and its biological basis was explored by comparing histologic patterns, genotypic alternations, genetic pathways, and infiltration of immune cells in microenvironments between risk groups.

RESULTS

The DLGS to predict grade 3 achieved AUCs of 0.862, 0.844, and 0.851 in the validation set (n = 497), external cohort (n = 382), and prospective cohort (n = 600), respectively, which were significantly better than 0.814, 0.810, and 0.806 of the PET model, 0.813, 0.795, and 0.824 of the CT model, and 0.762, 0.734, and 0.751 of the clinical model. Additionally, for DLGS-defined high-risk population, lobectomy yielded an improved prognosis compared to sublobectomy p = 0.085 for overall survival [OS] and p = 0.038 for recurrence-free survival [RFS]) and systematic nodal dissection conferred a superior prognosis to limited nodal dissection (p = 0.001 for OS and p = 0.041 for RFS).

CONCLUSION

The DLGS harbors the potential to predict the histologic grade and personalize the surgical treatments for clinical stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Its applicability to other territories should be further validated by a larger international study.

A combination of radiomic features, clinic characteristics, and serum tumor biomarkers to predict the possibility of the micropapillary/solid component of lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Invasive lung adenocarcinoma with MPP/SOL components has a poor prognosis and often shows a tendency to recurrence and metastasis. This poor prognosis may require adjustment of treatment strategies. Preoperative identification is essential for decision-making for subsequent treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to preoperatively predict the probability of MPP/SOL components in lung adenocarcinomas by a comprehensive model that includes radiomics features, clinical characteristics, and serum tumor biomarkers.

DESIGN

A retrospective case control, diagnostic accuracy study.

METHODS

This study retrospectively recruited 273 patients (males: females, 130: 143; mean age ± standard deviation, 63.29 ± 10.03 years; range 21-83 years) who underwent resection of invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Sixty-one patients (22.3%) were diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with MPP/SOL components. Radiomic features were extracted from CT before surgery. Clinical, radiomic, and combined models were developed using the logistic regression algorithm. The clinical and radiomic signatures were integrated into a nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). Studies were scored according to the Radiomics Quality Score and Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis guidelines.

RESULTS

The radiomics model achieved the best AUC values of 0.858 and 0.822 in the training and test cohort, respectively. Tumor size (T_size), solid tumor size (ST_size), consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR), years of smoking, CYFRA 21-1, and squamous cell carcinoma antigen were used to construct the clinical model. The clinical model achieved AUC values of 0.741 and 0.705 in the training and test cohort, respectively. The nomogram showed higher AUCs of 0.894 and 0.843 in the training and test cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study has developed and validated a combined nomogram, a visual tool that integrates CT radiomics features with clinical indicators and serum tumor biomarkers. This innovative model facilitates the differentiation of micropapillary or solid components within lung adenocarcinoma and achieves a higher AUC, indicating superior predictive accuracy.

Multi-classification model incorporating radiomics and clinic-radiological features for predicting invasiveness and differentiation of pulmonary adenocarcinoma nodules

PURPOSE

To develop a comprehensive multi-classification model that combines radiomics and clinic-radiological features to accurately predict the invasiveness and differentiation of pulmonary adenocarcinoma nodules.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort comprising 500 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma between January 2020 and December 2022. The dataset included preoperative CT images and histological reports of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS, n = 97), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA, n = 139), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC, n = 264) with well-differentiated (WIAC, n = 99), moderately differentiated (MIAC, n = 84), and poorly differentiated IAC (PIAC, n = 81). The patients were classified into two groups (IAC and non-IAC) for binary classification and further divided into three and five groups for multi-classification. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm to identify the most informative radiomics and clinic-radiological features. Eight machine learning (ML) models were developed using these features, and their performance was evaluated using accuracy (ACC) and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The combined model, utilizing the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, demonstrated improved performance in the testing cohort, achieving an AUC of 0.942 and an ACC of 0.894 for the two-classification task. For the three- and five-classification tasks, the combined model employing the one versus one strategy of SVM (SVM-OVO) outperformed other models, with ACC values of 0.767 and 0.607, respectively. The AUC values for histological subtypes ranged from 0.787 to 0.929 in the testing cohort, while the Macro-AUC and Micro-AUC of the multi-classification models ranged from 0.858 to 0.896.

CONCLUSIONS

A multi-classification radiomics model combined with clinic-radiological features, using the SVM-OVO algorithm, holds promise for accurately predicting the histological characteristics of pulmonary adenocarcinoma nodules, which contributes to personalized treatment strategies for patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

A clinical spectrum of resectable lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary component (MPC) concurrently presenting as mixed ground-glass opacity nodules

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, preoperative identification of mixed ground-glass opacity (mGGO) nodules with micropapillary component (MPC) to facilitate the implementation of individualized therapeutic strategies and avoid unnecessary surgery is increasingly importantOBJECTIVE: This study aimed to build a predictive model based on clinical and radiological variables for the early identification of MPC in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as mGGO nodules.

METHODS

The enrolled 741 lung adenocarcinoma patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort (3:1 ratio). The pathological specimens and preoperative images of malignant mGGO nodules from the study subjects were retrospectively reviewed. Furthermore, in the training cohort, selected clinical and radiological variables were utilized to construct a predictive model for MPC prediction.

RESULTS

The MPC was found in 228 (43.3%) patients in the training cohort and 72 (41.1%) patients in the validation cohort. Based on the predictive nomogram, the air bronchogram was defined as the most dominant independent risk factor for MPC of mGGO nodules, followed by the maximum computed tomography (CT) value (> 200), adjacent to pleura, gender (male), and vacuolar sign. The nomogram demonstrated good discriminative ability with a C-index of 0.783 (95%[CI] 0.744-0.822) in the training cohort and a C-index of 0.799 (95%[CI] 0.732-0.866) in the validation cohort Additionally, by using the bootstrapping method, this predictive model calculated a corrected AUC of 0.774 (95% CI: 0.770-0.779) in the training cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed a predictive model for preoperative identification of MPC in known lung adenocarcinomas presenting as mGGO nodules to facilitate individualized therapy. This nomogram model needs to be further externally validated by subsequent multicenter studies.

Predicting micropapillary or solid pattern of lung adenocarcinoma with CT-based radiomics, conventional radiographic and clinical features

BACKGROUND

To build prediction models with radiomics features, clinical/conventional radiographic signs and combined scores for the discrimination of micropapillary or solid subtypes (high-risk subtypes) of lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 351 patients with and without high-risk subtypes. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression with cross-validation was performed to determine the optimal features of radiomics model. Missing clinical data were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Chain Equations (MICE). Clinical model with radiographic signs was built and scores of both models were integrated to establish combined model. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, area under ROC curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were plotted to evaluate the model performance and clinical application.

RESULTS

Stratified splitting allocated 246 patients into training set. MICE for missing values obtained complete and unbiased data for the following analysis. Ninety radiomic features and four clinical/conventional radiographic signs were used to predict the high-risk subtypes. The radiomic model, clinical model and combined model achieved AUCs of 0.863 (95%CI: 0.817-0.909), 0.771 (95%CI: 0.713-0.713) and 0.872 (95%CI: 0.829-0.916) in the training set, and 0.849 (95%CI: 0.774-0.924), 0.778 (95%CI: 0.687-0.868) and 0.853 (95%CI: 0.782-0.925) in the test set. Decision curve showed that the radiomic and combined models were more clinically useful when the threshold reached 37.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics features could facilitate the prediction of subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma. A simple combination of radiomics and clinical scores generated a robust model with high performance for the discrimination of micropapillary or solid subtype of lung adenocarcinoma.

Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT radiomics for identifying aggressive histopathological subtypes in early stage lung adenocarcinoma

Lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) is the most common non-small cell lung cancer. Surgical resection is the primary treatment for early-stage lung ADC while lung-sparing surgery is an alternative for non-aggressive cases. Identifying histopathologic subtypes before surgery helps determine the optimal surgical approach. Predominantly solid or micropapillary (MIP) subtypes are aggressive and associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence and metastasis and lower survival rates. This study aims to non-invasively identify these aggressive subtypes using preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and diagnostic CT radiomics analysis. We retrospectively studied 119 patients with stage I lung ADC and tumors ≤ 2 cm, where 23 had aggressive subtypes (18 solid and 5 MIPs). Out of 214 radiomic features from the PET/CT and CT scans and 14 clinical parameters, 78 significant features (3 CT and 75 PET features) were identified through univariate analysis and hierarchical clustering with minimized feature collinearity. A combination of Support Vector Machine classifier and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator built predictive models. Ten iterations of 10-fold cross-validation (10 ×10-fold CV) evaluated the model. A pair of texture feature (PET GLCM Correlation) and shape feature (CT Sphericity) emerged as the best predictor. The radiomics model significantly outperformed the conventional predictor SUVmax (accuracy: 83.5% vs. 74.7%, p = 9e-9) and identified aggressive subtypes by evaluating FDG uptake in the tumor and tumor shape. It also demonstrated a high negative predictive value of 95.6% compared to SUVmax (88.2%, p = 2e-10). The proposed radiomics approach could reduce unnecessary extensive surgeries for non-aggressive subtype patients, improving surgical decision-making for early-stage lung ADC patients.

Comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features

To investigate whether the combination scheme of deep learning score (DL-score) and radiomics can improve preoperative diagnosis in the presence of micropapillary/solid (MPP/SOL) patterns in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). A retrospective cohort of 514 confirmed pathologically lung ADC in 512 patients after surgery was enrolled. The clinicoradiographic model (model 1) and radiomics model (model 2) were developed with logistic regression. The deep learning model (model 3) was constructed based on the deep learning score (DL-score). The combine model (model 4) was based on DL-score and R-score and clinicoradiographic variables. The performance of these models was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using DeLong's test internally and externally. The prediction nomogram was plotted, and clinical utility depicted with decision curve. The performance of model 1, model 2, model 3 and model 4 was supported by AUCs of 0.848, 0.896, 0.906, 0.921 in the Internal validation set, that of 0.700, 0.801, 0.730, 0.827 in external validation set, respectively. These models existed statistical significance in internal validation (model 4 vs model 3, P = 0.016; model 4 vs model 1, P = 0.009, respectively) and external validation (model 4 vs model 2, P = 0.036; model 4 vs model 3, P = 0.047; model 4 vs model 1, P = 0.016, respectively). The decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that model 4 predicting the lung ADC with MPP/SOL structure would be more beneficial than the model 1and model 3 but comparable with the model 2. The combined model can improve preoperative diagnosis in the presence of MPP/SOL pattern in lung ADC in clinical practice.

Predictive scoring of high-grade histology among early-stage lung cancer patients: The MOSS score

BACKGROUND

Poor prognosis associated with adenocarcinoma of International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grade 3 has been recognized. In this study we aimed to develop a scoring system for predicting IASLC grade 3 based before surgery.

METHODS

Two retrospective datasets with significant heterogeneity were used to develop and evaluate a scoring system. The development set was comprised of patients with pathological stage I nonmucinous adenocarcinoma and they were randomly divided into training (n = 375) and validation (n = 125) datasets. Using multivariate logistic regression, a scoring system was developed and internally validated. Later, this new score was further tested in the testing set which was comprised of patients with clinical stage 0-I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 281).

RESULTS

Four factors that were related to IASLC grade 3 were used to develop the new scoring system the MOSS score; male (M, point 1), overweight (O, point 1), size>10 mm (S, point 1), and solid lesions (S, point 3). Predictability of IASLC grade 3 increased from 0.4% to 75.2% with scores from 0 to 6. The area under the curve (AUC) of the MOSS was 0.889 and 0.765 for the training and validation datasets, respectively. The MOSS score exhibited similar predictability in the testing set (AUC: 0.820).

CONCLUSION

The MOSS score, which combines preoperative variables, can be used to identify high-risk early-stage NSCLC patients with aggressive histological features. It can support clinicians in determining a treatment plan and surgical extent. Further refinement of this scoring system with prospective validation is needed.

An ordinal radiomic model to predict the differentiation grade of invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma based on low-dose computed tomography in lung cancer screening

OBJECTIVES

To construct a radiomic model of low-dose CT (LDCT) to predict the differentiation grade of invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma (IPA) and compare its diagnostic performance with quantitative-semantic model and radiologists.

METHODS

A total of 682 pulmonary nodules were divided into the primary cohort (181 grade 1; 254 grade 2; 64 grade 3) and validation cohort (69 grade 1; 99 grade 2; 15 grade 3) according to scanners. The radiomic and quantitative-semantic models were built using ordinal logistic regression. The diagnostic performance of the models and radiologists was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and accuracy.

RESULTS

The radiomic model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in the validation cohort (AUC, 0.900 (95%CI: 0.847-0.939) for Grade 1 vs. Grade 2/Grade 3; AUC, 0.929 (95%CI: 0.882-0.962) for Grade 1/Grade 2 vs. Grade 3; accuracy, 0.803 (95%CI: 0.737-0.857)). No significant difference in diagnostic performance was found between the radiomic model and radiological expert (AUC, 0.840 (95%CI: 0.779-0.890) for Grade 1 vs. Grade 2/Grade 3, p = 0.130; AUC, 0.852 (95%CI: 0.793-0.900) for Grade 1/Grade 2 vs. Grade 3, p = 0.170; accuracy, 0.743 (95%CI: 0.673-0.804), p = 0.079), but the radiomic model outperformed the quantitative-semantic model and inexperienced radiologists (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomic model of LDCT can be used to predict the differentiation grade of IPA in lung cancer screening, and its diagnostic performance is comparable to that of radiological expert.

KEY POINTS

• Early identifying the novel differentiation grade of invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma may provide guidance for further surveillance, surgical strategy, or more adjuvant treatment. • The diagnostic performance of the radiomic model is comparable to that of a radiological expert and superior to that of the quantitative-semantic model and inexperienced radiologists. • The radiomic model of low-dose CT can be used to predict the differentiation grade of invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma in lung cancer screening.

A Combination of Radiomic Features, Imaging Characteristics, and Serum Tumor Biomarkers to Predict the Possibility of the High-Grade Subtypes of Lung Adenocarcinoma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Lung adenocarcinomas (LADC) containing high-grade subtypes have a poorer prognosis. And some studies have shown that high-grade subtypes have been identified as an independent predictor of local recurrence in patients treated with limited resection. The aim of this study was to construct a combined model based on radiomic features, imaging characteristics and serum tumor biomarkers to predict the possibility of preoperative high-grade subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

156 patients with LADC were retrospectively recruited in this study. These patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Radiomics features and imaging characteristics were extracted from plain CT images. A nomogram was developed in a training cohort by univariate and multivariate logistic analysis, and its performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in the training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 1316 radiomic features were extracted from the lesions in plain chest CT images. After applying the mRMR algorithm and the LASSO regression, 4 features were retained. Based on these radiomic features, Radiomic score (Radscore) was calculated for each patient. Spiculation, air bronchogram sign, CYFRA 21-1 and Radscore had been used in the construction of the combined model. The AUC of the combined model was respectively 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.00) in the training and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The combined model based on CT images and serum tumor biomarkers, can predict the high-grade subtypes of LADC in a non-invasive manner, which may influence individual treatment planning, such as the choice of surgical approach and postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Radiomics for identifying lung adenocarcinomas with predominant lepidic growth manifesting as large pure ground-glass nodules on CT images

Purpose

To explore the value of radiomics in the identification of lung adenocarcinomas with predominant lepidic growth in pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) larger than 10 mm.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed CT images of 204 patients with large pGGNs (≥ 10 mm) pathologically diagnosed as minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIAs), lepidic predominant adenocarcinomas (LPAs), and non-lepidic predominant adenocarcinomas (NLPAs). All pGGNs in the two groups (MIA/LPA and NLPA) were randomly divided into training and test cohorts. Forty-seven patients from another center formed the external validation cohort. Baseline features, including clinical data and CT morphological and quantitative parameters, were collected to establish a baseline model. The radiomics model was built with the optimal radiomics features. The combined model was developed using the rad_score and independent baseline predictors. The performance of the models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using the DeLong test. The differential diagnosis performance of the models was compared with three radiologists (with 20+, 10+, and 3 years of experience) in the test cohort.

Results

The radiomics (training AUC: 0.833; test AUC: 0.804; and external validation AUC: 0.792) and combined (AUC: 0.849, 0.820, and 0.775, respectively) models performed better for discriminating than the baseline model (AUC: 0.756, 0.762, and 0.725, respectively) developed by tumor location and mean CT value of the whole nodule. The DeLong test showed that the AUCs of the combined and radiomics models were significantly increased in the training cohort. The highest AUC value of the radiologists was 0.600.

Conclusion

The application of CT radiomics improved the identification performance of lung adenocarcinomas with predominant lepidic growth appearing as pGGNs larger than 10 mm.

Preoperative prediction of the degree of differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma presenting as sub-solid or solid nodules with a radiomics nomogram

AIM

To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram for prediction of degree of differentiation in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as sub-solid or solid nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 438 patients with histopathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma (248 non-poorly differentiated and 190 poorly differentiated) were divided into training cohort (n=235) and internal validation cohort (n=203) according to surgery sequence. Sixty patients form public TCIA dataset were selected for external validation. One thousand, two hundred and eighteen radiomics features were extracted from each volumetric region of interest and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was applied to select meaningful radiomic features for building a radiomics score (Rad-score) model. A nomogram model incorporating the Rad-score and type was established after multivariable logistic regression. The discrimination efficiency, calibration efficacy, and clinical utility value of the nomogram were evaluated.

RESULTS

The Rad-score model could predict the differentiation degree of lung adenocarcinoma with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.89) in the internal validation cohort. The AUC of the nomogram and radiographic model was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.84) in the internal validation cohort respectively. The AUC of the nomogram in the external validation cohort was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.88). Delong's test showed that the nomogram performed better than radiographic features alone (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed radiomics nomogram has the potential to predict the differentiation degree of lung adenocarcinoma preoperatively.

Cytomorphometric and flow cytometric analyses using liquid-based cytology materials in subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The histological classifications of invasive lung adenocarcinoma subtypes are considered to predict patient prognosis after surgical treatment. The objectives of this study were to evaluate cytomorphological characteristics and proliferative activities among the histological predominant patterns by performing cytomorphometric and flow cytometric analyses using liquid-based cytology materials.

METHODS

Cytological samples fixed by liquid-based cytology preservatives from 53 surgically-resected lung adenocarcinoma specimens were obtained between August 2018 and November 2019. The Papanicolaou-stained and paired Ki-67-stained slides were analyzed for calculating nuclear morphology (nuclear area, nuclear perimeter and nuclear circularity) and Ki-67 labeling index using software. The cell proliferation index (CPIx) was calculated and cellular information including cell cycle stage of tumor cells was obtained by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The 53 cases included papillary (n = 29), acinar (n = 8), lepidic (n = 5), and solid (n = 4) subtypes, and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 7) were also included. In the lepidic pattern, nuclear area (79.6 ± 28.8 μm² ) and perimeter (34.1 ± 6.1 μm) were relatively larger and longer than those of the other predominant patterns. The Ki-67 labeling index of the solid pattern (27.9 ± 12.5%) was highest compared with those of other predominant patterns. There were statistically significant differences in the lepidic versus solid patterns and the papillary versus solid patterns (p = .013 and p = .039, respectively). The calculated mean CPIx of the lepidic and the acinar patterns were approximately two-fold higher than those of the other predominant patterns.

CONCLUSION

By revealing the differences of cytomorphological characteristics, these methodologies might be used for diagnosing cytopathological materials using digital cytopathology.

Serum tumor markers level and their predictive values for solid and micropapillary components in lung adenocarcinoma

Background

This study aims to reveal the serum tumor marker (STM) levels in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) histological subtypes and evaluate their values in predicting the solid and micropapillary components (SMC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 3100 invasive LUAD patients between January 2017 and December 2020. Associations between preoperative STMs (CEA, CYFRA21‐1, CA199, CA724, NSE, AFP) and LUAD subtypes were evaluated. Multivariate regression analyses were used to determine the independent predictors. Predictive models for SMC were constructed and AUC (area under the curve) was calculated.

Results

CEA and CYFRA21‐1 levels differed across the LUAD histological subtypes, with the SPA (solid‐predominant adenocarcinoma) having the highest level and the LPA (lepidic‐predominant adenocarcinoma) harboring the lowest level (p <0.001). Tumors with SMC also had higher CEA and CYFRA21‐1 levels than those absence of SMC. Gender, tumor size, CEA, Ki‐67, EGFR mutation (solid components only), and tumor differentiation were significantly independently associated with the containing of SMC. Patients were split into two data sets (training set: 2017–2019 and validation set: 2020). The model with gender and tumor size yielded an AUC of 0.723 (training set) and 0.704 (validation set) for the solid component. Combination of CEA, gender, and tumor size led to a significant increase in the predictive accuracy (training set: 0.771, p = 0.009; validation set: 0.747, p = 0.034). The AUC of the model for micropapillary component with only gender and tumor size was 0.699 and 0.711 in the training set and validation set, respectively. Integration of CEA with gender and tumor size significantly improved the predictive performance with an AUC of 0.746 (training set, p = 0.045) and 0.753 (validation set, p <0.001).

Conclusion

Serum CEA and CYFRA21‐1 varied considerably according to LUAD histological subtypes. The combination of serum CEA and other factors showed prominent values in predicting the SMC.

Preoperative CT-Based Radiomics Combined With Nodule Type to Predict the Micropapillary Pattern in Lung Adenocarcinoma of Size 2 cm or Less: A Multicenter Study

Purpose

To construct an optimal radiomics model for preoperative prediction micropapillary pattern (MPP) in adenocarcinoma (ADC) of size ≤ 2 cm, nodule type was used for stratification to construct two radiomics models based on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with pathologically confirmed ADC of size ≤ 2 cm who presented to three hospitals. Patients presenting to the hospital with the greater number of patients were included in the training set (n = 2386) and those presenting to the other two hospitals were included in the external validation set (n = 119). HRCT images were used for delineation of region of interest of tumor and extraction of radiomics features; dimensionality reduction was performed for the features. Nodule type was used to stratify the data and the random forest method was used to construct two models for preoperative prediction MPP in ADC of size ≤ 2 cm. Model 1 included all nodule types and model 2 included only solid nodules. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the prediction performance of the two models and independent validation was used to assess its generalizability.

Results

Both models predicted ADC with MPP preoperatively. The area under the curve (AUC) of prediction performance of models 1 and 2 were 0.91 and 0.78, respectively. The prediction performance of model 2 was lower than that of model 1. The AUCs in the external validation set were 0.81 and 0.72, respectively. The DeLong test showed statistically significant differences between the training and validation sets in model 1 (p = 0.0296) with weak generalizability. There was no statistically significant difference between the training and validation sets in model 2 (p = 0.2865) with some generalizability.

Conclusion

Nodule type is an important factor that affects the performance of radiomics predictor model for MPP with ADC of size ≤ 2 cm. The radiomics prediction model constructed based on solid nodules alone, can be used to evaluate MPP and may contribute to proper surgical planning in patients with ADC of size ≤ 2 cm.

Prognostic Value of Pre-Treatment CT Radiomics and Clinical Factors for the Overall Survival of Advanced (IIIB-IV) Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of pre-treatment CT radiomics and clinical factors for the overall survival (OS) of advanced (IIIB–IV) lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Methods

This study involved 165 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The Lasso–Cox regression model was used for feature selection and radiomics signature building. Then a clinical model was built based on clinical factors; a combined model in the form of nomogram was constructed with both clinical factors and the radiomics signature. Harrell’s concordance index (C-Index) and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves at cut-off time points of 1-, 2-, and 3- year were used to estimate and compare the predictive ability of all three models. Finally, the discriminatory ability and calibration of the nomogram were analyzed.

Results

Thirteen significant features were selected to build the radiomics signature whose C-indexes were 0.746 (95% CI, 0.699 to 0.792) in the training cohort and 0.677 (95% CI, 0.597 to 0.766) in the validation cohort. The C-indexes of combined model achieved 0.799 (95% CI, 0.757 to 0.84) in the training cohort and 0.733 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.81) in the validation cohort, which outperformed the clinical model and radiomics signature. Moreover, the areas under the curve (AUCs) of the radiomic signature for 2-year prediction was superior to that of the clinical model. The combined model had the best AUCs for 2- and 3-year predictions.

Conclusions

Radiomic signatures and clinical factors have prognostic value for OS in advanced (IIIB–IV) lung adenocarcinoma patients. The optimal model should be selected according to different cut-off time points in clinical application.

Structural and functional radiomics for lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer ranks second in new cancer cases and first in cancer-related deaths worldwide. Precision medicine is working on altering treatment approaches and improving outcomes in this patient population. Radiological images are a powerful non-invasive tool in the screening and diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer, treatment strategy support, prognosis assessment, and follow-up for advanced-stage lung cancer. Recently, radiological features have evolved from solely semantic to include (handcrafted and deep) radiomic features. Radiomics entails the extraction and analysis of quantitative features from medical images using mathematical and machine learning methods to explore possible ties with biology and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Here, we outline the latest applications of both structural and functional radiomics in detection, diagnosis, and prediction of pathology, gene mutation, treatment strategy, follow-up, treatment response evaluation, and prognosis in the field of lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

The major drawbacks of radiomics are the lack of large datasets with high-quality data, standardization of methodology, the black-box nature of deep learning, and reproducibility. The prerequisite for the clinical implementation of radiomics is that these limitations are addressed. Future directions include a safer and more efficient model-training mode, merge multi-modality images, and combined multi-discipline or multi-omics to form "Medomics."

A machine learning-based prediction of the micropapillary/solid growth pattern in invasive lung adenocarcinoma with radiomics

BACKGROUND

Micropapillary/solid (MP/S) growth patterns of lung adenocarcinoma are vital for making clinical decisions regarding surgical intervention. This study aimed to predict the presence of a MP/S component in lung adenocarcinoma using radiomics analysis.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2013, patients undergoing curative invasive lung adenocarcinoma resection were included. Using the "PyRadiomics" package, we extracted 90 radiomics features from the preoperative computed tomography (CT) images. Subsequently, four prediction models were built by utilizing conventional machine learning approaches fitting into radiomics analysis: a generalized linear model (GLM), Naïve Bayes, support vector machine (SVM), and random forest classifiers. The models' accuracy was assessed using a receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, and the models' stability was validated both internally and externally.

RESULTS

A total of 268 patients were included as a primary cohort, and 36.6% (98/268) of them had lung adenocarcinoma with an MP/S component. Patients with an MP/S component had a higher rate of lymph node metastasis (18.4% versus 5.3%) and worse recurrence-free and overall survival. Five radiomics features were selected for model building, and in the internal validation, the four models achieved comparable performance of MP/S prediction in terms of area under the curve (AUC): GLM, 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.83]; Naïve Bayes, 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.85); SVM, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.61-0.83); and random forest, 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.81). External validation was performed using a test cohort with 193 patients, and the AUC values were 0.70, 0.72, 0.73, and 0.69 for Naïve Bayes, SVM, random forest, and GLM, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics-based machine learning approach is a very strong tool for preoperatively predicting the presence of MP/S growth patterns in lung adenocarcinoma, and can help customize treatment and surveillance strategies.

A narrative review of invasive diagnostics and treatment of early lung cancer

The diagnosis and treatment of early-stage lung cancer remains a clinical challenge. The broadening implementation of lung cancer screening has resulted in positive findings in numerous patients that are mostly non-malignant. Many other patients have indeterminate nodules that are difficult to assess through simple observation. The critical interpretation of such screening results remains a challenge for radiologists and multidisciplinary teams involved in screening for lung cancer. The evaluation and diagnosis of each participant suspected for malignancy should be based on the basic clinical principles such as a carefully collected medical history, physical examination, and detailed analysis of all imaging tests performed. Indeed, the decision to go ahead with more invasive diagnostics requires consideration of the both the risks and benefits, with reflection upon the complete clinical and radiological picture. Although transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy remains the first-choice method of diagnosis, several newer technologies have slowly begun to emerge as potential replacements. The guiding strategy for method selection is to choose the least harmful approach that offers the most relevant potential insights. Transthoracic biopsy is an effective method that allows the collection of cytological and tissue material from small, peripheral tumors, but it carries a moderate risk of complications. Bronchofiberoscopy, especially in combination with electromagnetic navigation, fluoroscopy or radial EBUS, also allows effective diagnosis of the peripheral pulmonary nodules. One of the most important diagnostic methods is the EBUS examination, which allows determining of staging in addition to diagnosis. Anatomical lung lobe resection and lymphadenectomy or sampling of the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes is currently the treatment of choice for patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but sublobar resections are recommended when a patient has limited pulmonary function or other significant comorbidities. Notably, several studies have highlighted the potential utility of more limited resections in small malignant lesions less than 2cm in diameter, with pure AIS histology, when more than 50% of the diameter of pulmonary nodule has ground-glass opacity (GGO) attenuation on CT, or long volume doubling time (VDT). Videothoracoscopy is the preferred surgical approach for resection of early-stage lung cancer. Patients who are not candidates for surgery or do not agree to surgery can be offered radical radiotherapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a type of radical radiotherapy with proven effectiveness, a high rate of local control and an acceptable risk of the development of later complications. Future trials are expected to define the role of SBRT in the treatment of early lung cancer in healthy subjects.

Radiogenomics in Interventional Oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiogenomics is a growing field that has garnered immense interest over the past decade, owing to its numerous applications in the field of oncology and its potential value in improving patient outcomes. Current applications have only begun to delve into the potential of radiogenomics, and particularly in interventional oncology, there is room for development and increased value of these applications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The field of interventional oncology (IO) has seen valuable radiogenomic applications, from prediction of response to locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma to identification of genetic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Future directions that can increase the value of radiogenomics include applications that address tumor heterogeneity, predict immune responsiveness of tumors, and differentiate between oligoprogression and early widespread progression, among others. Radiogenomics, whether in terms of methodologies or applications, is still in the early stages of development and far from maturation. Future applications, particularly in the field of interventional oncology, will allow realization of its full potential.

3D radiomics predicts EGFR mutation, exon-19 deletion and exon-21 L858R mutation in lung adenocarcinoma

Background

To establish a radiomic approach to identify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma patients based on CT images, and to distinguish exon-19 deletion and exon-21 L858R mutation.

Methods

Two hundred sixty-three patients who underwent pre-surgical contrast-enhanced CT and molecular testing were included, and randomly divided into the training (80%) and test (20%) cohort. Tumor images were three-dimensionally segmented to extract 1,672 radiomic features. Clinical features (age, gender, and smoking history) were added to build classification models together with radiomic features. Subsequently, the top-10 most relevant features were used to establish classifiers. For the classifying tasks including EGFR mutation, exon-19 deletion, and exon-21 L858R mutation, four logistic regression models were established for each task.

Results

The training and test cohort consisted of 210 and 53 patients, respectively. Among the established models, the highest accuracy and sensitivity among the four models were 75.5% (61.7–86.2%) and 92.9% (76.5–99.1%) to classify EGFR mutation, respectively. The highest specificity values were 86.7% (69.3–96.2%) and 70.4% (49.8–86.3%) to classify exon-19 deletion and exon-21 L858R mutation, respectively.

Conclusions

CT radiomics can sensitively identify the presence of EGFR mutation, and increase the certainty of distinguishing exon-19 deletion and exon-21 L858R mutation in lung adenocarcinoma patients. CT radiomics may become a helpful non-invasive biomarker to select EGFR mutation patients for invasive sampling.