1
|
Pallumeera M, Giang JC, Singh R, Pracha NS, Makary MS. Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:1510. [PMID: 40361437 PMCID: PMC12070983 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17091510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2025] [Revised: 04/23/2025] [Accepted: 04/27/2025] [Indexed: 05/15/2025] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing cancer imaging, enhancing screening, diagnosis, and treatment options for clinicians. AI-driven applications, particularly deep learning and machine learning, excel in risk assessment, tumor detection, classification, and predictive treatment prognosis. Machine learning algorithms, especially deep learning frameworks, improve lesion characterization and automated segmentation, leading to enhanced radiomic feature extraction and delineation. Radiomics, which quantifies imaging features, offers personalized treatment response predictions across various imaging modalities. AI models also facilitate technological improvements in non-diagnostic tasks, such as image optimization and automated medical reporting. Despite advancements, challenges persist in integrating AI into healthcare, tracking accurate data, and ensuring patient privacy. Validation through clinician input and multi-institutional studies is essential for patient safety and model generalizability. This requires support from radiologists worldwide and consideration of complex regulatory processes. Future directions include elaborating on existing optimizations, integrating advanced AI techniques, improving patient-centric medicine, and expanding healthcare accessibility. AI can enhance cancer imaging, optimizing precision medicine and improving patient outcomes. Ongoing multidisciplinary collaboration between radiologists, oncologists, software developers, and regulatory bodies is crucial for AI's growing role in clinical oncology. This review aims to provide an overview of the applications of AI in oncologic imaging while also discussing their limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustaqueem Pallumeera
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (M.P.); (N.S.P.)
| | - Jonathan C. Giang
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA; (J.C.G.); (R.S.)
| | - Ramanpreet Singh
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA; (J.C.G.); (R.S.)
| | - Nooruddin S. Pracha
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (M.P.); (N.S.P.)
| | - Mina S. Makary
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan L, Li Q, Fu K, Zhou X, Zhang K. Progress in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound-Assisted Medical Diagnosis. Bioengineering (Basel) 2025; 12:288. [PMID: 40150752 PMCID: PMC11939760 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12030288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2025] [Revised: 03/07/2025] [Accepted: 03/12/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into ultrasound medicine has revolutionized medical imaging, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and clinical workflows. This review focuses on the applications, challenges, and future directions of AI technologies, particularly machine learning (ML) and its subset, deep learning (DL), in ultrasound diagnostics. By leveraging advanced algorithms such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), AI has significantly improved image acquisition, quality assessment, and objective disease diagnosis. AI-driven solutions now facilitate automated image analysis, intelligent diagnostic assistance, and medical education, enabling precise lesion detection across various organs while reducing physician workload. AI's error detection capabilities further enhance diagnostic accuracy. Looking ahead, the integration of AI with ultrasound is expected to deepen, promoting trends in standardization, personalized treatment, and intelligent healthcare, particularly in underserved areas. Despite its potential, comprehensive assessments of AI's diagnostic accuracy and ethical implications remain limited, necessitating rigorous evaluations to ensure effectiveness in clinical practice. This review provides a systematic evaluation of AI technologies in ultrasound medicine, highlighting their transformative potential to improve global healthcare outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Yan
- Institute of Medical Research, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China; (L.Y.); (K.F.)
| | - Qing Li
- Ultrasound Diagnosis & Treatment Center, Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi’an 710100, China
| | - Kang Fu
- Institute of Medical Research, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China; (L.Y.); (K.F.)
| | - Xiaodong Zhou
- Ultrasound Diagnosis & Treatment Center, Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi’an 710100, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Dermatology and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Xi’an No. 3 Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an 718000, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan SR, Khan A, Tareen A. Establishing Artificial Intelligence-Powered Virtual Tumor Board Meetings in Pakistan. Cancer Control 2025; 32:10732748251331753. [PMID: 40152019 PMCID: PMC11951892 DOI: 10.1177/10732748251331753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2025] [Accepted: 03/17/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Equitable cancer care in low- and middle-income countries is crucial as mortality rates continue to rise. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered Virtual Tumor Board Meetings (VTBMs) offer an innovative solution that facilitates real-time collaboration between experts to improve patient outcomes. By integrating AI-powered tools, VTBMs can improve diagnostic accuracy and personalize treatment plans using various data sources such as medical images and genomic profiles. In Pakistan, with limited healthcare resources and a high economic burden, the introduction of AI-powered VTBMs has the potential to revolutionize cancer care. This strategic approach will not only address the current challenges in Pakistan, but also serve as a model for improving cancer care in various developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saqib Raza Khan
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Anoud Khan
- Department of Medicine, Ziauddin Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Aryan Tareen
- Department of Medicine, Ziauddin Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gurnani B, Kaur K, Lalgudi VG, Kundu G, Mimouni M, Liu H, Jhanji V, Prakash G, Roy AS, Shetty R, Gurav JS. Role of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning models in corneal disorders - A narrative review. J Fr Ophtalmol 2024; 47:104242. [PMID: 39013268 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
In the last decade, artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted ophthalmology, particularly in managing corneal diseases, a major reversible cause of blindness. This review explores AI's transformative role in the corneal subspecialty, which has adopted advanced technology for superior clinical judgment, early diagnosis, and personalized therapy. While AI's role in anterior segment diseases is less documented compared to glaucoma and retinal pathologies, this review highlights its integration into corneal diagnostics through imaging techniques like slit-lamp biomicroscopy, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and in vivo confocal biomicroscopy. AI has been pivotal in refining decision-making and prognosis for conditions such as keratoconus, infectious keratitis, and dystrophies. Multi-disease deep learning neural networks (MDDNs) have shown diagnostic ability in classifying corneal diseases using AS-OCT images, achieving notable metrics like an AUC of 0.910. AI's progress over two decades has significantly improved the accuracy of diagnosing conditions like keratoconus and microbial keratitis. For instance, AI has achieved a 90.7% accuracy rate in classifying bacterial and fungal keratitis and an AUC of 0.910 in differentiating various corneal diseases. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have enhanced the analysis of color-coded corneal maps, yielding up to 99.3% diagnostic accuracy for keratoconus. Deep learning algorithms have also shown robust performance in detecting fungal hyphae on in vivo confocal microscopy, with precise quantification of hyphal density. AI models combining tomography scans and visual acuity have demonstrated up to 97% accuracy in keratoconus staging according to the Amsler-Krumeich classification. However, the review acknowledges the limitations of current AI models, including their reliance on binary classification, which may not capture the complexity of real-world clinical presentations with multiple coexisting disorders. Challenges also include dependency on data quality, diverse imaging protocols, and integrating multimodal images for a generalized AI diagnosis. The need for interpretability in AI models is emphasized to foster trust and applicability in clinical settings. Looking ahead, AI has the potential to unravel the intricate mechanisms behind corneal pathologies, reduce healthcare's carbon footprint, and revolutionize diagnostic and management paradigms. Ethical and regulatory considerations will accompany AI's clinical adoption, marking an era where AI not only assists but augments ophthalmic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Gurnani
- Department of Cataract, Cornea, External Disease, Trauma, Ocular Surface and Refractive Surgery, ASG Eye Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
| | - K Kaur
- Department of Cataract, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, ASG Eye Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - V G Lalgudi
- Department of Cornea, Refractive surgery, Ira G Ross Eye Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo, USA
| | - G Kundu
- Department of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India
| | - M Mimouni
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rambam Health Care Campus affiliated with the Bruce and Ruth Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - H Liu
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - V Jhanji
- UPMC Eye Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - G Prakash
- Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - A S Roy
- Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India
| | - R Shetty
- Department of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India
| | - J S Gurav
- Department of Opthalmology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nair M, Svedberg P, Larsson I, Nygren JM. A comprehensive overview of barriers and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare: Mixed-method design. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0305949. [PMID: 39121051 PMCID: PMC11315296 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Implementation of artificial intelligence systems for healthcare is challenging. Understanding the barriers and implementation strategies can impact their adoption and allows for better anticipation and planning. This study's objective was to create a detailed inventory of barriers to and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare to support advancements in methods and implementation processes in healthcare. A sequential explanatory mixed method design was used. Firstly, scoping reviews and systematic literature reviews were identified using PubMed. Selected studies included empirical cases of AI implementation and use in clinical practice. As the reviews were deemed insufficient to fulfil the aim of the study, data collection shifted to the primary studies included in those reviews. The primary studies were screened by title and abstract, and thereafter read in full text. Then, data on barriers to and strategies for AI implementation were extracted from the included articles, thematically coded by inductive analysis, and summarized. Subsequently, a direct qualitative content analysis of 69 interviews with healthcare leaders and healthcare professionals confirmed and added results from the literature review. Thirty-eight empirical cases from the six identified scoping and literature reviews met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Barriers to and strategies for AI implementation were grouped under three phases of implementation (planning, implementing, and sustaining the use) and were categorized into eleven concepts; Leadership, Buy-in, Change management, Engagement, Workflow, Finance and human resources, Legal, Training, Data, Evaluation and monitoring, Maintenance. Ethics emerged as a twelfth concept through qualitative analysis of the interviews. This study illustrates the inherent challenges and useful strategies in implementing AI in healthcare practice. Future research should explore various aspects of leadership, collaboration and contracts among key stakeholders, legal strategies surrounding clinicians' liability, solutions to ethical dilemmas, infrastructure for efficient integration of AI in workflows, and define decision points in the implementation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Nair
- School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Petra Svedberg
- School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Larsson
- School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Jens M. Nygren
- School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Floca R, Bohn J, Haux C, Wiestler B, Zöllner FG, Reinke A, Weiß J, Nolden M, Albert S, Persigehl T, Norajitra T, Baeßler B, Dewey M, Braren R, Büchert M, Fallenberg EM, Galldiks N, Gerken A, Götz M, Hahn HK, Haubold J, Haueise T, Große Hokamp N, Ingrisch M, Iuga AI, Janoschke M, Jung M, Kiefer LS, Lohmann P, Machann J, Moltz JH, Nattenmüller J, Nonnenmacher T, Oerther B, Othman AE, Peisen F, Schick F, Umutlu L, Wichtmann BD, Zhao W, Caspers S, Schlemmer HP, Schlett CL, Maier-Hein K, Bamberg F. Radiomics workflow definition & challenges - German priority program 2177 consensus statement on clinically applied radiomics. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:124. [PMID: 38825600 PMCID: PMC11144687 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01704-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Achieving a consensus on a definition for different aspects of radiomics workflows to support their translation into clinical usage. Furthermore, to assess the perspective of experts on important challenges for a successful clinical workflow implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS The consensus was achieved by a multi-stage process. Stage 1 comprised a definition screening, a retrospective analysis with semantic mapping of terms found in 22 workflow definitions, and the compilation of an initial baseline definition. Stages 2 and 3 consisted of a Delphi process with over 45 experts hailing from sites participating in the German Research Foundation (DFG) Priority Program 2177. Stage 2 aimed to achieve a broad consensus for a definition proposal, while stage 3 identified the importance of translational challenges. RESULTS Workflow definitions from 22 publications (published 2012-2020) were analyzed. Sixty-nine definition terms were extracted, mapped, and semantic ambiguities (e.g., homonymous and synonymous terms) were identified and resolved. The consensus definition was developed via a Delphi process. The final definition comprising seven phases and 37 aspects reached a high overall consensus (> 89% of experts "agree" or "strongly agree"). Two aspects reached no strong consensus. In addition, the Delphi process identified and characterized from the participating experts' perspective the ten most important challenges in radiomics workflows. CONCLUSION To overcome semantic inconsistencies between existing definitions and offer a well-defined, broad, referenceable terminology, a consensus workflow definition for radiomics-based setups and a terms mapping to existing literature was compiled. Moreover, the most relevant challenges towards clinical application were characterized. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Lack of standardization represents one major obstacle to successful clinical translation of radiomics. Here, we report a consensus workflow definition on different aspects of radiomics studies and highlight important challenges to advance the clinical adoption of radiomics. KEY POINTS Published radiomics workflow terminologies are inconsistent, hindering standardization and translation. A consensus radiomics workflow definition proposal with high agreement was developed. Publicly available result resources for further exploitation by the scientific community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Floca
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology NCRO, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology HIRO, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jonas Bohn
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Haux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, TU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, TU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank G Zöllner
- Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annika Reinke
- Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Helmholtz Imaging, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Weiß
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marco Nolden
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Albert
- Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tobias Norajitra
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bettina Baeßler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marc Dewey
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin Institute of Health, DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), and DKTK (German Cancer Consortium), both partner sites Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rickmer Braren
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Medicine, School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich partner site, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Büchert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Bonn, Cologne & Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Annika Gerken
- Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Michael Götz
- Division of Experimental Radiology, Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Horst K Hahn
- Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany
- Faculty 3, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Johannes Haubold
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Tobias Haueise
- Section on Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nils Große Hokamp
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Ingrisch
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andra-Iza Iuga
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marco Janoschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Jung
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lena Sophie Kiefer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Machann
- Section on Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Johanna Nattenmüller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Nonnenmacher
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedict Oerther
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ahmed E Othman
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Felix Peisen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Fritz Schick
- Section on Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Barbara D Wichtmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Wenzhao Zhao
- Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Svenja Caspers
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute for Anatomy I, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Radiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christopher L Schlett
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Maier-Hein
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Medical Image Computing, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pattern Analysis and Learning Group, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Küstner T, Hepp T, Seith F. Multiparametric Oncologic Hybrid Imaging: Machine Learning Challenges and Opportunities. Nuklearmedizin 2023; 62:306-313. [PMID: 37802058 DOI: 10.1055/a-2157-6670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine learning (ML) is considered an important technology for future data analysis in health care. METHODS The inherently technology-driven fields of diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine will both benefit from ML in terms of image acquisition and reconstruction. Within the next few years, this will lead to accelerated image acquisition, improved image quality, a reduction of motion artifacts and - for PET imaging - reduced radiation exposure and new approaches for attenuation correction. Furthermore, ML has the potential to support decision making by a combined analysis of data derived from different modalities, especially in oncology. In this context, we see great potential for ML in multiparametric hybrid imaging and the development of imaging biomarkers. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION In this review, we will describe the basics of ML, present approaches in hybrid imaging of MRI, CT, and PET, and discuss the specific challenges associated with it and the steps ahead to make ML a diagnostic and clinical tool in the future. KEY POINTS · ML provides a viable clinical solution for the reconstruction, processing, and analysis of hybrid imaging obtained from MRI, CT, and PET..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Küstner
- Medical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Hepp
- Medical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, Germany
| | - Ferdinand Seith
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hehakaya C, Moors EHM. Institutionalisation of convergent medical innovation: an empirical study of the MRI-guided linear accelerator in the Netherlands and the United States. INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT 2023; 27:74-95. [PMID: 39935856 PMCID: PMC11809769 DOI: 10.1080/14479338.2023.2213212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2025]
Abstract
Although convergence is a major trend in the development of medical innovations, the implications of the institutionalisation of convergent innovation are understudied. This paper explores how the institutionalisation of convergent innovation affects the organisation of health care, by using operational domains and categories of the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) and the Institutional Readiness (IR) approach respectively. We use an illustrative comparative case study on the institutionalisation of MRI-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) technology in the Netherlands and the United States. Empirically, we conducted 66 interviews with different professionals in the health care system around MR-Linac. The findings show that institutionalisation of convergent innovation affects the organisation of health care by: changing the traditional organisation of solving a medical problem, thereby transforming and reorganising work in the health care environment, providing opportunities for individual user development, collective action and cross-sectoral developments, and requiring the additional work of evaluating convergent innovation, including administrative tasks, innovation and research activities within and across institutions. The insights offered are also relevant for understanding convergence in the medical field, and for rethinking medical innovation in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charisma Hehakaya
- Global Public Health & Bioethics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen H. M. Moors
- Innovation Studies, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stoumpos AI, Kitsios F, Talias MA. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3407. [PMID: 36834105 PMCID: PMC9963556 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 180] [Impact Index Per Article: 90.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Technological innovation has become an integral aspect of our daily life, such as wearable and information technology, virtual reality and the Internet of Things which have contributed to transforming healthcare business and operations. Patients will now have a broader range and more mindful healthcare choices and experience a new era of healthcare with a patient-centric culture. Digital transformation determines personal and institutional health care. This paper aims to analyse the changes taking place in the field of healthcare due to digital transformation. For this purpose, a systematic bibliographic review is performed, utilising Scopus, Science Direct and PubMed databases from 2008 to 2021. Our methodology is based on the approach by Wester and Watson, which classify the related articles based on a concept-centric method and an ad hoc classification system which identify the categories used to describe areas of literature. The search was made during August 2022 and identified 5847 papers, of which 321 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for further process. Finally, by removing and adding additional studies, we ended with 287 articles grouped into five themes: information technology in health, the educational impact of e-health, the acceptance of e-health, telemedicine and security issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelos I. Stoumpos
- Healthcare Management Postgraduate Program, Open University Cyprus, P.O. Box 12794, Nicosia 2252, Cyprus
| | - Fotis Kitsios
- Department of Applied Informatics, University of Macedonia, 156 Egnatia Street, GR54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Michael A. Talias
- Healthcare Management Postgraduate Program, Open University Cyprus, P.O. Box 12794, Nicosia 2252, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eysenbach G, Leung T, Schneider G, Heinze O. Exploring Stakeholder Requirements to Enable the Research and Development of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in a Hospital-Based Generic Infrastructure: Protocol for a Multistep Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e42208. [PMID: 36525300 PMCID: PMC9804098 DOI: 10.2196/42208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, research and developments in advancing artificial intelligence (AI) in health care and medicine have increased. High expectations surround the use of AI technologies, such as improvements for diagnosis and increases in the quality of care with reductions in health care costs. The successful development and testing of new AI algorithms require large amounts of high-quality data. Academic hospitals could provide the data needed for AI development, but granting legal, controlled, and regulated access to these data for developers and researchers is difficult. Therefore, the German Federal Ministry of Health supports the Protected Artificial Intelligence Innovation Environment for Patient-Oriented Digital Health Solutions for Developing, Testing, and Evidence-Based Evaluation of Clinical Value (pAItient) project, aiming to install the AI Innovation Environment at the Heidelberg University Hospital in Germany. The AI Innovation Environment was designed as a proof-of-concept extension of the already existing Medical Data Integration Center. It will establish a process to support every step of developing and testing AI-based technologies. OBJECTIVE The first part of the pAItient project, as presented in this research protocol, aims to explore stakeholders' requirements for developing AI in partnership with an academic hospital and granting AI experts access to anonymized personal health data. METHODS We planned a multistep mixed methods approach. In the first step, researchers and employees from stakeholder organizations were invited to participate in semistructured interviews. In the following step, questionnaires were developed based on the participants' answers and distributed among the stakeholders' organizations to quantify qualitative findings and discover important aspects that were not mentioned by the interviewees. The questionnaires will be analyzed descriptively. In addition, patients and physicians were interviewed as well. No survey questionnaires were developed for this second group of participants. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Heidelberg University Hospital (approval number: S-241/2021). RESULTS Data collection concluded in summer 2022. Data analysis is planned to start in fall 2022. We plan to publish the results in winter 2022 to 2023. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study will help in shaping the AI Innovation Environment at our academic hospital according to stakeholder requirements. With this approach, in turn, we aim to shape an AI environment that is effective and is deemed acceptable by all parties. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/42208.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gerd Schneider
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Heinze
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Weinert L, Klass M, Schneider G, Heinze O. Exploring Stakeholder Requirements to enable research and development of AI algorithms in a hospital based generic infrastructure: Results of a Multi-step mixed-methods Study (Preprint). JMIR Form Res 2022; 7:e43958. [PMID: 37071450 PMCID: PMC10155093 DOI: 10.2196/43958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Legal, controlled, and regulated access to high-quality data from academic hospitals currently poses a barrier to the development and testing of new artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. To overcome this barrier, the German Federal Ministry of Health supports the "pAItient" (Protected Artificial Intelligence Innovation Environment for Patient Oriented Digital Health Solutions for developing, testing and evidence-based evaluation of clinical value) project, with the goal to establish an AI Innovation Environment at the Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany. It is designed as a proof-of-concept extension to the preexisting Medical Data Integration Center. OBJECTIVE The first part of the pAItient project aims to explore stakeholders' requirements for developing AI in partnership with an academic hospital and granting AI experts access to anonymized personal health data. METHODS We designed a multistep mixed methods approach. First, researchers and employees from stakeholder organizations were invited to participate in semistructured interviews. In the following step, questionnaires were developed based on the participants' answers and distributed among the stakeholders' organizations. In addition, patients and physicians were interviewed. RESULTS The identified requirements covered a wide range and were conflicting sometimes. Relevant patient requirements included adequate provision of necessary information for data use, clear medical objective of the research and development activities, trustworthiness of the organization collecting the patient data, and data should not be reidentifiable. Requirements of AI researchers and developers encompassed contact with clinical users, an acceptable user interface (UI) for shared data platforms, stable connection to the planned infrastructure, relevant use cases, and assistance in dealing with data privacy regulations. In a next step, a requirements model was developed, which depicts the identified requirements in different layers. This developed model will be used to communicate stakeholder requirements within the pAItient project consortium. CONCLUSIONS The study led to the identification of necessary requirements for the development, testing, and validation of AI applications within a hospital-based generic infrastructure. A requirements model was developed, which will inform the next steps in the development of an AI innovation environment at our institution. Results from our study replicate previous findings from other contexts and will add to the emerging discussion on the use of routine medical data for the development of AI applications. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/42208.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Weinert
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Translational Health Economics, Department for Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Klass
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gerd Schneider
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Heinze
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer imaging. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2022; 2:133. [PMID: 36310650 PMCID: PMC9613681 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-022-00199-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing array of tools is being developed using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for cancer imaging. The development of an optimal tool requires multidisciplinary engagement to ensure that the appropriate use case is met, as well as to undertake robust development and testing prior to its adoption into healthcare systems. This multidisciplinary review highlights key developments in the field. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of AI and ML in cancer imaging; considerations for the development of algorithms into tools that can be widely used and disseminated; and the development of the ecosystem needed to promote growth of AI and ML in cancer imaging.
Collapse
|
13
|
Koebe P, Bohnet-Joschko S. The Impact of Digital Transformation on Inpatient Care: A Mixed Design Study (Preprint). JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022; 9:e40622. [PMID: 37083473 PMCID: PMC10163407 DOI: 10.2196/40622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the context of the digital transformation of all areas of society, health care providers are also under pressure to change. New technologies and a change in patients' self-perception and health awareness require rethinking the provision of health care services. New technologies and the extensive use of data can change provision processes, optimize them, or replace them with new services. The inpatient sector, which accounts for a particularly large share of health care spending, plays a major role in this regard. OBJECTIVE This study examined the influences of current trends in digitization on inpatient service delivery. METHODS We conducted a scoping review. This was applied to identify the international trends in digital transformation as they relate to hospitals. Future trends were considered from different perspectives. Using the defined inclusion criteria, international peer-reviewed articles published between 2016 and 2021 were selected. The extracted core trends were then contextualized for the German hospital sector with 12 experts. RESULTS We included 44 articles in the literature analysis. From these, 8 core trends could be deduced. A heuristic impact model of the trends was derived from the data obtained and the experts' assessments. This model provides a development corridor for the interaction of the trends with regard to technological intensity and supply quality. Trend accelerators and barriers were identified. CONCLUSIONS The impact analysis showed the dependencies of a successful digital transformation in the hospital sector. Although data interoperability is of particular importance for technological intensity, the changed self-image of patients was shown to be decisive with regard to the quality of care. We show that hospitals must find their role in new digitally driven ecosystems, adapt their business models to customer expectations, and use up-to-date information and communications technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Koebe
- Faculty of Management, Economics and Society, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Sabine Bohnet-Joschko
- Faculty of Management, Economics and Society, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Küstner T, Hepp T, Seith F. Multiparametric Oncologic Hybrid Imaging: Machine Learning Challenges and Opportunities. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022; 194:605-612. [PMID: 35211929 DOI: 10.1055/a-1718-4128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine learning (ML) is considered an important technology for future data analysis in health care. METHODS The inherently technology-driven fields of diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine will both benefit from ML in terms of image acquisition and reconstruction. Within the next few years, this will lead to accelerated image acquisition, improved image quality, a reduction of motion artifacts and - for PET imaging - reduced radiation exposure and new approaches for attenuation correction. Furthermore, ML has the potential to support decision making by a combined analysis of data derived from different modalities, especially in oncology. In this context, we see great potential for ML in multiparametric hybrid imaging and the development of imaging biomarkers. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION In this review, we will describe the basics of ML, present approaches in hybrid imaging of MRI, CT, and PET, and discuss the specific challenges associated with it and the steps ahead to make ML a diagnostic and clinical tool in the future. KEY POINTS · ML provides a viable clinical solution for the reconstruction, processing, and analysis of hybrid imaging obtained from MRI, CT, and PET.. CITATION FORMAT · Küstner T, Hepp T, Seith F. Multiparametric Oncologic Hybrid Imaging: Machine Learning Challenges and Opportunities. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1718-4128.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Küstner
- Medical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Hepp
- Medical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, Germany
| | - Ferdinand Seith
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2022; 296:114782. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
16
|
Rogasch JMM, Penzkofer T. AI in nuclear medicine - what, why and how? Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:321-324. [PMID: 34607369 DOI: 10.1055/a-1542-6231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
17
|
Chauhan C, Gullapalli RR. Ethics of AI in Pathology: Current Paradigms and Emerging Issues. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2021; 191:1673-1683. [PMID: 34252382 PMCID: PMC8485059 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Deep learning has rapidly advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic decision-making (ADM) paradigms, affecting many traditional fields of medicine, including pathology, which is a heavily data-centric specialty of medicine. The structured nature of pathology data repositories makes it highly attractive to AI researchers to train deep learning models to improve health care delivery. Additionally, there are enormous financial incentives driving adoption of AI and ADM due to promise of increased efficiency of the health care delivery process. AI, if used unethically, may exacerbate existing inequities of health care, especially if not implemented correctly. There is an urgent need to harness the vast power of AI in an ethically and morally justifiable manner. This review explores the key issues involving AI ethics in pathology. Issues related to ethical design of pathology AI studies and the potential risks associated with implementation of AI and ADM within the pathology workflow are discussed. Three key foundational principles of ethical AI: transparency, accountability, and governance, are described in the context of pathology. The future practice of pathology must be guided by these principles. Pathologists should be aware of the potential of AI to deliver superlative health care and the ethical pitfalls associated with it. Finally, pathologists must have a seat at the table to drive future implementation of ethical AI in the practice of pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chhavi Chauhan
- American Society of Investigative Pathology, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Rama R Gullapalli
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Jackson BR, Ye Y, Crawford JM, Becich MJ, Roy S, Botkin JR, de Baca ME, Pantanowitz L. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Pathology and Laboratory Medicine: Principles and Practice. Acad Pathol 2021; 8:2374289521990784. [PMID: 33644301 PMCID: PMC7894680 DOI: 10.1177/2374289521990784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Growing numbers of artificial intelligence applications are being developed and applied to pathology and laboratory medicine. These technologies introduce risks and benefits that must be assessed and managed through the lens of ethics. This article describes how long-standing principles of medical and scientific ethics can be applied to artificial intelligence using examples from pathology and laboratory medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R. Jackson
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ye Ye
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James M. Crawford
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Michael J. Becich
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Somak Roy
- Division of Pathology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jeffrey R. Botkin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kratov S, Zybarev Y. To the question of the digital platform "bioinformatics" creating and its system-forming solutions. J Integr Bioinform 2020; 17:/j/jib.ahead-of-print/jib-2020-0029/jib-2020-0029.xml. [PMID: 33141107 DOI: 10.1515/jib-2020-0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The article reports the main provisions of the concept and solutions for creating the digital platform in the field of bioinformatics and the formation of the thematically oriented and industrial digital ecosystems on its basis. The composition and structure of the digital platform are discussed: information repositories, data and knowledge bases, thematically oriented software repository, task-oriented services for various target groups of users. Within the framework of the platform, it is also planned to organize a system of high-quality access to specialized data centres and high-performance computing infrastructure. Particular attention is devoted to one of the components of such platform - the project office for bioresource collections management. The project office has registered such types of collections as animal collections: wild and laboratory animals, live breeding, museum zoological animal collections, farm animals; plant collections: herbarium funds of plants biological diversity, living collections of natural flora, agricultural plants. Collection types such as collections of human biomaterials, cell culture collections, microorganism collections are important for medical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey Kratov
- The Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
- Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Yurii Zybarev
- The Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shouval R, Fein JA, Savani B, Mohty M, Nagler A. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in haematology. Br J Haematol 2020; 192:239-250. [PMID: 32602593 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Digitalization of the medical record and integration of genomic methods into clinical practice have resulted in an unprecedented wealth of data. Machine learning is a subdomain of artificial intelligence that attempts to computationally extract meaningful insights from complex data structures. Applications of machine learning in haematological scenarios are steadily increasing. However, basic concepts are often unfamiliar to clinicians and investigators. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with tools to interpret and critically appraise machine learning literature. We begin with the elucidation of standard terminology and then review examples in haematology. Guidelines for designing and evaluating machine-learning studies are provided. Finally, we discuss limitations of the machine-learning approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roni Shouval
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Division, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Joshua A Fein
- University of Connecticut Medical Center, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Bipin Savani
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mohamad Mohty
- European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Paris Study Office/CEREST-TC, Paris, France.,Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Arnon Nagler
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Division, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Theek B, Nolte T, Pantke D, Schrank F, Gremse F, Schulz V, Kiessling F. Emerging methods in radiology. Radiologe 2020; 60:41-53. [PMID: 32430576 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00696-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Imaging modalities have developed rapidly in recent decades. In addition to improved resolution as well as whole-body and faster image acquisition, the possibilities of functional and molecular examination of tissue pathophysiology have had a decisive influence on imaging diagnostics and provided ground-breaking knowledge. Many promising approaches are currently being pursued to increase the application area of devices and contrast media and to improve their sensitivity and quantitative informative value. These are complemented by new methods of data processing, multiparametric data analysis, and integrated diagnostics. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of technological innovations that will enrich clinical imaging in the future, and to highlight the resultant diagnostic options. These relate to the established imaging methods such as CT, MRI, ultrasound, PET, and SPECT but also to new methods such as magnetic particle imaging (MPI), optical imaging, and photoacoustics. In addition, approaches to radiomic image evaluation are explained and the chances and difficulties for their broad clinical introduction are discussed. The potential of imaging to describe pathophysiological relationships in ever increasing detail, both at whole-body and tissue level, can in future be used to better understand the mechanistic effect of drugs, to preselect patients to therapies, and to improve monitoring of therapy success. Consequently, the use of interdisciplinary integrated diagnostics will greatly change and enrich the profession of radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Theek
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany
| | - T Nolte
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - D Pantke
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - F Schrank
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - F Gremse
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - V Schulz
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.,Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - F Kiessling
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52074, Aachen, Germany. .,Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany. .,Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|