Mortality after mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation stroke may be higher at nighttime and on weekends

Outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke associated with large vessel occlusion admitted during regular and off-hours: a sub-analysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2

BACKGROUND

Off-hour admissions can adversely affect clinical outcomes, though evidence in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) associated with large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains limited. This study aimed to examine the impact of off-hour versus regular-hour admissions on outcomes in patients with AIS associated with LVO.

METHODS

Data from the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism (RESCUE)-Japan Registry 2, a prospective multicenter registry of patients with AIS associated with LVO were used. Eligible patients were aged ≥20 years and admitted within 24 hours of stroke onset. Off-hour admissions were defined as those occurring between 17:00 and 09:00 on weekdays and at all times on holidays, reflecting typical periods of reduced healthcare staffing. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2, assessed 90 days post-admission.

RESULTS

Of the 2390 patients, 1794 (71.7%) and 676 (28.3%) were admitted during off-hours and regular hours, respectively. Intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator was administered to 617 (36.0%) off-hour patients and 336 (49.7%) regular-hour patients (P<0.0001). Endovascular therapy was provided to 915 (53.4%) off-hour patients and 361 (53.4%) regular-hour patients (P=0.99). Favorable outcomes (mRS score 0-2) were observed in 604 (35.2%) off-hour patients and 272 (40.2%) regular-hour patients (P=0.02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in the primary outcome between groups (adjusted OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.35; P=0.56).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that off-hour and regular-hour admissions have similar clinical outcomes in patients with AIS associated with LVO in this Japanese cohort.

Nighttime Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Are Associated With Poor Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIA) is associated with poor outcomes. Although immediate treatment of RIAs is preferred, optimal treatment timing is multifactorial and may be a complicating factor for achieving the best outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients with RIAs as a function of treatment time of day. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examines how treatment time of day influences treatment outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included all patients who were treated, either surgically or endovascularly, for RIAs within 24 hours after admission. Exclusion criteria were blister, mycotic or giant aneurysms, or incomplete records. The modified Rankin Scale was used to evaluate treatment outcomes using multivariate analysis. Nighttime treatment was defined when greater than 50% of the procedure was performed between 10 pm and 7 am , with other times classified as daytime treatment. Off-hours treatment was defined when more than 50% of the procedure was performed between 7 pm and 7 am , with other times classified as on-hours.

RESULTS

This study included 493 patients, with 84.2% (415) treated during the daytime, 15.8% (78) during the nighttime, 67.5% (333) during on-hours, and 32.5% (160) during off-hours. These groups did not differ according to age, sex, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and Fisher scales, aneurysm size, location, and surgical or endovascular treatment. Outcomes were favorable (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) for 72.0% (299) of patients treated during the daytime and 60.0% (46) of patients treated during the nighttime. Aneurysm treatment during the nighttime (OR: 0.50 [95% CI: 0.28-0.91], P = .023) but not during off-hours (OR: 0.76 [0.50-1.14], P = .18) was independently associated with unfavorable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Nighttime treatment was associated with poorer outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate outcomes if treatment is postponed to daytime hours.

Differences in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke on weekdays versus nights/ weekends in a Japanese primary stroke core center

OBJECTIVE

The term "weekend effect" refers to an increase in the mortality rate for hospitalizations occurring on weekends versus weekdays. In this study, we investigated whether such an effect exists in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (currently the standard treatment for this condition) at a single center in Japan.

METHODS

We surveyed 151 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (75 and 76 patients were treated during daytime and nighttime, respectively) from January 2019 to June 2021. The items evaluated in this analysis were the rate of modified Rankin Scale ≤2 or prestroke scale, mortality, and procedural treatment time.

RESULTS

The rates of modified Rankin Scale ≤2 or prestroke scale and mortality at 90 days after treatment did not differ significantly between daytime and nighttime (41.3% vs. 29.0%, p=0.11; 14.7% vs. 11.8%, p=0.61, respectively). The door-to-groin time tended to be shorter during daytime versus nighttime (57 [IQR: 42.5-70] min vs. 70 [IQR: 55-82]) min, p=0.0507).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not reveal differences in treatment outcome between daytime and nighttime in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Therefore, the "weekend effect" was not observed in our institution.

Patterns and outcomes of weekend admission for acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The "weekend effect" describes worse care delivery during off-hours or weekends and has been demonstrated in multiple sub-specialties. Off-hours care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been associated with poorer outcomes. However, there is less data about the "weekend effect" on endovascular thrombectomy (ET) outcomes.

METHODS

We used Medicare 100% sample datasets and included all AIS admissions from 2018-2019, using validated International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify AIS and comorbidities. Medicare provides the date of admission for all hospitalizations, and the day of the week was determined and assigned to weekend (Saturday or Sunday) or weekday (Monday through Friday). We defined 3 major outcomes: inpatient mortality, discharge home (vs. other destination), and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 471427 AIS admissions,13.0% and 12.9% of all AIS admissions occurred on a Saturday and Sunday, respectively, less than the expected 14.3% occurring on any given day (p-value <0.0001). AIS admissions on a weekend were less likely to receive IV thrombolysis (13.6% on Saturday and 12.9% on Sunday) and ET (13.1% on Saturday and 13.2% on Sunday), p-value <0.0001. Among all AIS admissions, weekend admission was associated with worse outcomes, including higher odds of inpatient mortality (adjusted OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.01-1.08, p<0.0001]), lower odds of discharge home (0.94 [0.93-0.96, p<0.0001]), and higher odds of 30-day mortality (1.06 [1.04-1.08, p<0.0001]). However, among AIS patients treated with ET, there was no association of weekend admission with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national and contemporary dataset, we observed that the proportion of thrombolysis and ET cases was less over the weekend, and outcomes (inpatient mortality, 30-day mortality and odds of discharge home) were worse overall. We did not observe this association among AIS patients undergoing ET on a weekend vs. weekday.

Does Weekends Effect Exist in Asia? Analysis of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in A Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Discussing the quality measurements based on interrupted time series in ischemic stroke, delays are often attributed to weekends effect. This study compared the metrics and outcomes of emergent endovascular thrombectomy (EST) during working hours versus non-working hours in the emergency department of an Asian medical center.

METHODS

A total of 297 patients who underwent EST between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively included, with 52.5% of patients presenting during working hours and 47.5% presenting during nights, weekends, or holidays.

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes were more in non-working hours than in working hours (53.9% vs. 41.0%; p=0.026). It took longer during nonworking hours than working hours in door-to -image times (13 min vs. 12 min; p=0.04) and door-to-groin puncture times (median: 112 min vs. 104 min; p=0.042). Significant statistical differences were not observed between the two groups in neurological outcomes, including successful reperfusion and complications such as intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. However, the change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores in 24 hours was better in the working-hour group than in the nonworking-hour group (4 vs. 2; p=0.058).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that nonworking-hour effects truly exist in patients who received EST. Although delays in door-to-groin puncture times were noticed during nonworking hours, significant differences in neurological functions and mortality were not observed between working and non-working hours. Nevertheless, methods to improve the process during non-working hours should be explored in the future.

Workflow Intervals and Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On-Vs. Off-hours in China: The ANGEL-ACT Registry

Background: There may be a delay in or a poor outcome of endovascular treatment (EVT) among acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) during off-hours. By using a prospective, nationwide registry, we compared the workflow intervals and radiological/clinical outcomes between patients with acute LVO treated with EVT presenting during off- and on-hours.

Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT) data. Patients presenting during off-hours were defined as those presenting to the emergency department from Monday to Friday between 17:30 and 08:00, on weekends (from 17:30 on Friday to 08:00 on Monday), and on national holidays. We used logistic regression models with adjustment for potential confounders to determine independent associations between the time of presentation and outcomes.

Results: Among 1,788 patients, 1,079 (60.3%) presented during off-hours. The median onset-to-door time and onset-to-reperfusion time were significantly longer during off-hours than during on-hours (165 vs. 125 min, P = 0.002 and 410 vs. 392 min, P = 0.027). The rates of successful reperfusion and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar in both groups. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score was 0.892 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.748–1.064]. The adjusted OR for the occurrence of functional independence was 0.892 (95% CI, 0.724–1.098), and the adjusted OR for mortality was 1.214 (95% CI, 0.919–1.603).

Conclusions: Off-hours presentation in the nationwide real-world registry was associated with a delay in the visit and reperfusion time of EVT in patients with AIS. However, this delay was not associated with worse functional outcomes or higher mortality rates.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Investigating the "Weekend Effect" on Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVES

With growing evidence of its efficacy for patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke, the use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has increased. The "weekend effect," whereby patients presenting during weekends/off hours have worse clinical outcomes than those presenting during normal working hours, is a critical area of study in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our objective was to evaluate whether a "weekend effect" exists in patients undergoing EVT.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2016-2018 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data included patients ≥18 years with documented diagnosis of ischemic stroke (ICD-10 codes I63, I64, and H34.1), procedural code for EVT, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score; the exposure variable was weekend vs. weekday treatment. The primary outcome was in-hospital death; secondary outcomes were favorable discharge, extended hospital stay (LOS), and cost. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine predictors for outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 6052 AIS patients who received EVT (mean age 68.7±14.8 years; 50.8% female; 70.8% White; median (IQR) admission NIHSS 16 (10-21). The primary outcome of in-hospital death occurred in 560 (11.1%); the secondary outcome of favorable discharge occurred in 1039 (20.6%). The mean LOS was 7.8±8.6 days. There were no significant differences in the outcomes or cost based on admission timing. In the mixed-effects models, we found no effect of weekend vs. weekday admission on in-hospital death, favorable discharge, or extended LOS.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that the "weekend effect" does not impact outcomes or cost for patients who undergo EVT for LVO.

Off-hour effect on time metrics and clinical outcomes in endovascular treatment for large vessel occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate on the off-hour effect on endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO).

AIM

This meta-analysis aimed to compare time metrics and clinical outcomes of acute LVO patients who presented/were treated during off-hour with those during working hours.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

Structured searches on the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted through 23 February 2021. The primary outcomes were onset to door (OTD), door to imaging, door to puncture (DTP), puncture to recanalization, procedural time, successful recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), mortality in hospital, good prognosis (90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2), and 90-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were imaging to puncture (ITP), onset to puncture (OTP), onset to recanalization (OTR), door to recanalization (DTR) time, mRS 0-2 at discharge, and consecutive 90-day mRS score. The odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the outcomes were calculated using random-effect models. Heterogenicity and publication bias were analyzed. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted as appropriate. Nineteen studies published between 2014 and 2021 with a total of 14,185 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Patients in the off-hour group were significantly younger than those in the on-hour group and with comparable stroke severity and intravenous thrombolysis rate. The off-hour group had longer OTD (WMD [95% CI], 12.83 [1.84-23.82] min), DTP (WMD [95% CI], 11.45 [5.93-16.97] min), ITP (WMD [95% CI], 10.39 [4.61-16.17] min), OTP (WMD [95% CI], 25.30 [13.11-37.50] min), OTR (WMD [95% CI], 25.16 [10.28-40.04] min), and DTR (WMD [95% CI], 18.02 [10.01-26.03] min) time. Significantly lower successful recanalization rate (OR [95% CI], 0.85 [0.76-0.95]; p = 0.004; I²= 0%) was detected in the off-hour group. No significant difference was noted regarding SICH and prognosis. But a trend toward lower OR of good prognosis was witnessed in the off-hour group (OR [95% CI], 0.92 [0.84-1.01]; p = 0.084; I²= 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who presented/were treated during off-hour were associated with excessive delays before the initiation of EVT, lower successful reperfusion rate, and a trend toward worse prognosis when compared with working hours. Optimizing the workflows of EVT during off-hour is needed.