The role of lesion hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI as an additional major imaging feature for HCC classification using LI-RADS v2018 criteria

Explainable Fusion Model for Predicting Postoperative Early Recurrence in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI Habitat Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To develop an explainable fusion model that combines clinical, radiomic, and habitat features to predict postoperative early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The bicentric retrospective study included 370 patients with surgically confirmed early-stage HCC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. The patients were stratified into a training cohort (n=296) and an external validation cohort (n=74). From the hepatobiliary phase images, habitat and radiomics features were extracted across the entire tumor and used to construct radiomics and habitat models. Additionally, a clinical model was established utilizing relevant clinical features. Subsequently, all previously mentioned features were merged to construct the fusion model (HabRad_FB). Diagnostic performance of these models was assessed and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). The fusion model was then interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis.

RESULTS

Tumor recurrence was observed in 73 out of 370 patients (19.7%; 55.2±11.3 years; male=333). Among all study cohorts, the HabRad_FB model showed the highest AUC (0.820-0.959), outperforming the clinical (0.517-0.729), radiomics (0.707-0.815), and habitat (0.729-0.861) models. The HabRad_FB model also demonstrated significant improvement in IDI in the training cohort and NRI in the validation cohort. SHAP force plots provided valuable insights into the interpretation of HabRad_FB model's predictions for early recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The HabRad_FB, an explainable fusion model, aids clinicians in accurately and non-invasively predicting the early recurrence of HCC preoperatively. This model might provide great potential in prognostic prediction and clinical management.

Modified LR-5 criteria based on gadoxetic acid can improve the sensitivity in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Currently, only tumors classified as LR-5 are considered definitive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and no further pathologic confirmation is required to initiate therapy. Previous studies have shown that the sensitivity of LR-5 is modest, and lesions enhanced by gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) may exhibit lower sensitivity than those enhanced by Gd-DTPA.

AIM

To identify malignant ancillary features (AFs) that can independently and significantly predict HCC in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018, and to develop modified LR-5 criteria to improve diagnostic performance on Gd-EOB-DTPA - enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS

Imaging data from patients with HCC risk factors who underwent abdominal Gd-EOB-DTPA - enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine AFs that could independently and significantly predict HCC. The modified LR-5 criteria involved reclassifying LR-4/LR-3 lesions based on major features combined with independently significant AFs for HCC, or by substituting threshold growth with significant AFs. McNemar's test was used to compare the diagnostic performance of the modified LR-5 criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 244 lesions from 216 patients were included. Transitional phase hypointensity, mild - moderate T2 hyperintensity, and fat in mass (more than adjacent liver) were identified as significant independent predictors of HCC. Using the modified LR-5 criteria (e.g., LR-5-M1: LR-4 + transitional phase hypointensity; LR-5-M4: LR-5 by transitional phase hypointensity instead of threshold growth; LR-5-M5: LR-5 by mild - moderate T2 hyperintensity instead of threshold growth; LR-5-M8: LR-3/LR-4 + any two features of transitional phase hypointensity/mild - moderate T2 hyperintensity/fat in mass), sensitivities were significantly increased (88.5%-89.1%) compared to the standard LR-5 (60.6%; all P values < 0.05), while specificities (84.8%-89.9%) remained largely unchanged (93.7%; all P values > 0.05). The LR-5-M8 criterion achieved the highest sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Mild - moderate T2 hyperintensity, transitional phase hypointensity, and fat in mass are independent and significant predictors of HCC malignant AFs. The modified LR-5 criteria can improve sensitivity without significantly reducing specificity.

Current State of Evidence for Use of MRI in LI-RADS

The American College of Radiology Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is the preeminent framework for classification and risk stratification of liver observations on imaging in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. In this review, the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma and the use of MRI in LI-RADS is discussed, including specifically the LI-RADS diagnostic algorithm, its components, and its reproducibility with reference to the latest supporting evidence. The LI-RADS treatment response algorithms are reviewed, including the more recent radiation treatment response algorithm. The application of artificial intelligence, points of controversy, LI-RADS relative to other liver imaging systems, and possible future directions are explored. After reading this article, the reader will have an understanding of the foundation and application of LI-RADS as well as possible future directions.

Intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI for characterizing focal liver lesions

BACKGROUND

Gadobenate and gadoxetate are hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents. We intraindividually compared these two agents for the characterization of focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

A total of 140 adult subjects were randomized to undergo two 3-T MRI exams separated by 7-14 days, one with 0.05 mmol/kg gadobenate and one with 0.025 mmol/kg gadoxetate. For both exams, we acquired the same unenhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted sequences, followed by contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences during the dynamic and hepatobiliary phases (HBP) (at 20 min for gadoxetate, at 120 min for gadobenate). Three experienced unaffiliated readers independently evaluated each exam in blinded, randomized order for lesion nature (benign/malignant) and specific lesion diagnosis. McNemar test, Wald tests. paired t-tests and κ statistics were used.

RESULTS

A total of 208 FLLs (108 malignant and 100 benign) were confirmed at final diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity for malignant/benign differentiation ranged from 91.6% to 99.1% and from 87.5% to 90.5% for gadobenate, and from 86.0% to 91.6% and from 79.7% to 83.6% for gadoxetate. Significantly (p ≤ 0.025) higher values for gadobenate were determined for all diagnostic performance parameters except for sensitivity and negative predictive value for one reader. Significantly (p < 0.001) greater accuracy and confidence for specific lesion diagnosis was achieved with gadobenate for two of three blinded readers. Interreader agreement for malignant/benign differentiation was better with gadobenate (κ = 0.91 versus κ = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Gadobenate was superior to gadoxetate for the differentiation and diagnosis of malignant and benign FLLs for two of three readers. Further confirmatory studies that include a wider representation of different types of FLLs are warranted.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Better diagnostic performance and greater confidence in the characterization of FLLs with gadobenate might improve patient management decisions and timings, and potentially lead to better patient outcomes.

KEY POINTS

Better diagnostic performance for the differentiation of FLLs was achieved with gadobenate for two of three readers. Reader confidence for lesion diagnosis was greater with gadobenate. Superior dynamic phase imaging with gadobenate was crucial for accurate lesion diagnosis.

Diagnostic performance of LR-5 based on hypointensity on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in the hepatobiliary phase for sHCC using LI-RADS v2018 criteria

AIM

To investigate the value of the LR-5, which is based on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity, for small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2021 in institution 1, and from January 2019 to February 2022 in institution 2, 239 patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) underwent contrast-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the imaging features and classified them according to LI-RADS v2018 criteria, calculating the diagnostic performance of LR-5 based on consensus data. LI-RADS-m1: HBP hypointensity was used as an additional major feature along with the LI-RADS v2018. LI-RADS-m2: HBP hypointensity replaced nonperipheral "washout" in the portal venous phase. The definition of LR-DN was nodules pathologically diagnosed as high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) were recategorized as LR-DN. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 was recalculated. The diagnostic performance of the LR-5 was compared using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Using LI-RADS v2018, LI-RADS-m1, and LI-RADS-m2 criteria for LR-5, the sensitivities were 82.67%, 86.22%, and 88.44%, the specificities were 82.00%, 66.00%, and 54.00%, and the accuracies were 82.55%, 82.55%, and 82.18%, respectively. After the addition of the LR-DN, the sensitivities of LR-5 in the above diagnostic model remained unchanged, with accuracies of 84.36%, 87.27%, and 88.36% and specificities of 92.00%, 92.00%, and 88.00%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HBP hypointensity may improve the sensitivity of LR-5. We attempted to propose the LR-DN, HBP hypointensity may be used as a complement to washout as an additional major feature without significantly decreasing specificity.

New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to modify LI-RADS version 2018 to improve sensitivity and determine the value of the combination of high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels for small HCC (sHCC, ≤ 30 mm) diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 984 patients at high risk for HCC, with 1204 observations (including 997 small observations ≤ 30 mm), who underwent extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI were enrolled from five independent centers. Blinded readers evaluated the LI-RADS features and categorized each observation according to the LI-RADS v2018, modified LI-RADS and EASL. Odds ratios of LI-RADS major features (MFs) and several high AFP levels for sHCC diagnosis were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. The modified LR-5 criteria was developed by including no APHE at any size with two MFs, and non-rim APHE with one MF (≥ 10 mm) or with two MFs (< 10 mm). The diagnostic performance of each version of the LR-5 was compared using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

APHE, washout, enhancing capsule and five high AFP levels were independently associated with sHCC. In three datasets, the modified LI-RADS had higher sensitivities for sHCC (76.8 ∼ 85.5 % vs. 73.7 ∼ 75.9 %, P < 0.05) to the LR-5 v2018. The modified LI-RADS with AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL as an additional feature or as an alternative to threshold growth provided higher sensitivities for sHCC than LI-RADS v2018 (82.1 ∼ 90.1 % vs. 73.7 ∼ 75.9 %, all P < 0.05), modified LI-RADS (82.1 ∼ 90.1 % vs. 76.8 ∼ 85.5 %, all P < 0.05) and EASL version 2018 (82.1 ∼ 90.1 % vs. 73.3 ∼ 74.7 %, all P < 0.05), with comparable specificities (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The new strategy of LI-RADS v2018 provides significantly higher sensitivity and comparable specificity than those of LI-RADS v2018 for sHCC diagnosis on ECA-MRI.

Performance of LI-RADS category 5 vs combined categories 4 and 5: a systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) category 5 has high specificity and modest sensitivity for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of LR-5 vs combined LR-4 and LR-5 (LR-4/5) for HCC diagnosis.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through January 03, 2023 were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 and combined LR-4/5 for HCC diagnosis, using CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine studies (15,108 observations, 9928 (65.7%) HCCs) were included. Compared to LR-5, combined LR-4/5 showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (83.0% (95% CI [80.3-85.8%]) vs 65.7% (95% CI [62.4-69.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled specificity (75.0% (95% CI [70.5-79.6%]) vs 91.7% (95% CI [90.2-93.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled positive likelihood ratio (3.60 (95% CI [3.06-4.23]) vs 6.18 (95% CI [5.35-7.14]); p < 0.001), and lower pooled negative likelihood ratio (0.22 (95% CI [0.19-0.25]) vs 0.38 (95% CI [0.35-0.41]) vs; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen in all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that combining LR-4 and LR-5 would increase sensitivity but decrease specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. These findings may inform management guidelines and individualized management.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This meta-analysis estimated the magnitude of changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria when LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were combined; these findings can inform management guidelines and individualized management.

KEY POINTS

There is no single worldwide reporting system for liver imaging, partly due to regional needs. Combining LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 increased sensitivity and decreased specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria can inform management guidelines and individualized management.

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We performed an updated meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) 5 category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018), and to evaluate differences by imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 using v2018 for diagnosing HCC. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies qualified for the meta-analysis, comprising 9031 patients, 10,547 observations, and 7216 HCCs. The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC were 66% (95% CI, 61-70%) and 91% (95% CI, 89-93%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, MRI with extracellular agent (ECA-MRI) showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (77% [95% CI, 70-82%]) than CT (66% [95% CI, 58-73%]; p = 0.023) or MRI with gadoxetate (Gx-MRI) (65% [95% CI, 60-70%]; p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference between ECA-MRI and MRI with gadobenate (gadobenate-MRI) (73% [95% CI, 61-82%]; p = 0.495). Pooled specificities were 88% (95% CI, 80-93%) for CT, 92% (95% CI, 86-95%) for ECA-MRI, 93% (95% CI, 91-95%) for Gx-MRI, and 91% (95% CI, 84-95%) for gadobenate-MRI without significant differences (p = 0.084-0.803).

CONCLUSIONS

LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material, while ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT or Gx-MRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Refinement of the criteria for improving sensitivity while maintaining high specificity of LR-5 for HCC diagnosis may be an essential future direction.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC using LI-RADSv2018 were 66% and 91%, respectively. • ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT (77% vs 66%, p = 0.023) or Gx-MRI (77% vs 65%, p = 0.001). • LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity (88-93%) for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material type.

Liver imaging reporting and data system diagnostic performance in hepatocellular carcinoma when modifying the definition of "washout" on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The sensitivity of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was suboptimal. This study evaluated the LI-RADS diagnostic performance in HCC when modifying the definition of washout using the transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity on EOB-MRI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients at high risk of HCC who underwent EOB-MRI from June 2016 to June 2021. Three modified LI-RADS (mLI-RADS) algorithms were formulated according to different definitions of washout as follows: (a) portal venous phase (PVP) or TP hypointensity, (b) PVP or HBP hypointensity, and (c) PVP or TP or HBP hypointensity. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, was compared between mLI-RADS and LI-RADS v2018 using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

A total of 379 patients with 426 pathologically confirmed hepatic observations (250 HCCs, 88 nonHCC malignancies, and 88 benign lesions) were included in our study. The sensitivity rates of mLI-RADS a-c (80.0 %, 80.8 %, and 80.8 %) were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (74.4 %) (all p < 0.05). The specificity rates of mLI-RADS a-c (86.9 %, 85.8 %, and 85.8 %) were all slightly lower than that of LI-RADS v2018 (88.6 %), although no statistically significant difference was noted (all p > 0.05). The accuracies of the three mLI-RADS algorithms were the same and were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (82.9 % vs. 80.3 %, all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When the definition of washout appearance was extended to TP or HBP hypointensity on EOB-MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC improved without decreasing specificity.

Comparison of the Ability of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Dimeglumine to Display the major Features for Noninvasively Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma According to the LI-RADS 2018v

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ability of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl dimeglumine (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) to display the 3 major features recommended by the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS 2018v) for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 98 HCC lesions that were scanned with either Gd-EOB-DTPA-MR or Gd-BOPTA-M.For each lesion, we collected multiple variables, including size and enhancement pattern in the arterial phase (AP), portal venous phase (PVP), transitional phase (TP), delayed phase (DP), and hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The lesion-to-liver contrast (LLC) was measured and calculated for each phase and then compared between the 2 contrast agents. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. The display efficiency of the LLC between Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA for HCC features was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Between Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA, significant differences were observed regarding the display efficiency for capsule enhancement and the LLC in the AP/PVP/DP (P < .05), but there was no significant difference regarding the LLC in the TP/HBP. Both Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA had good display efficiency in each phase (AUCmin > 0.750). When conducting a total evaluation of the combined data across the 5 phases, the display efficiency was excellent (AUC > 0.950).

CONCLUSION

Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA are liver-specific contrast agents widely used in clinical practice. They have their own characteristics in displaying the 3 main signs of HCC. For accurate noninvasive diagnosis, the choice of agent should be made according to the specific situation.

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: differential diagnostic value of ADC values for benign and malignant nodules with moderate probability (LR-3)

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in differentiating between benign and malignant LR-3 lesions classified by Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2018 (LI-RADS v2018).

Methods

Retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with liver nodules confirmed by pathology and classified as LR-3 by LI-RADS. All patients underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MR examination, and the following patient-related imaging features were collected: tumor size,nonrim APHE, nonperipheral "washout", enhancing "capsule", mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, fat in mass, restricted diffusion, and nodule-in-nodule architecture. We performed ROC analysis and calculated the sensitivity and specificity.

Results

A total of 122 lesions were found in 88 patients, with 68 benign and 54 malignant lesions. The mean ADC value for malignant and benign lesions were 1.01 ± 0.15 × 103 mm2/s and 1.41 ± 0.31 × 103 mm2/s, respectively. The ADC value of malignant lesions was significantly lower than that of benign lesions, p < 0.0001. Compared with other imaging features, ADC values had the highest AUC (AUC = 0.909), with a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 74.1% for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions.

Conclusions

ADC values are useful for differentiating between benign and malignant liver nodules in LR-3 classification, it improves the sensitivity of LI-RADS in the diagnosis of HCC while maintaining high specificity, and we recommend including ADC values in the standard interpretation of LI-RADSv2018.

A Multicenter Assessment of Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2018 for MRI and CT

Background Various limitations have impacted research evaluating reader agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). Purpose To assess reader agreement of LI-RADS in an international multicenter multireader setting using scrollable images. Materials and Methods This retrospective study used deidentified clinical multiphase CT and MRI and reports with at least one untreated observation from six institutions and three countries; only qualifying examinations were submitted. Examination dates were October 2017 to August 2018 at the coordinating center. One untreated observation per examination was randomly selected using observation identifiers, and its clinically assigned features were extracted from the report. The corresponding LI-RADS version 2018 category was computed as a rescored clinical read. Each examination was randomly assigned to two of 43 research readers who independently scored the observation. Agreement for an ordinal modified four-category LI-RADS scale (LR-1, definitely benign; LR-2, probably benign; LR-3, intermediate probability of malignancy; LR-4, probably hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]; LR-5, definitely HCC; LR-M, probably malignant but not HCC specific; and LR-TIV, tumor in vein) was computed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Agreement was also computed for dichotomized malignancy (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M, and LR-TIV), LR-5, and LR-M. Agreement was compared between research-versus-research reads and research-versus-clinical reads. Results The study population consisted of 484 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 10 [SD]; 156 women; 93 CT examinations, 391 MRI examinations). ICCs for ordinal LI-RADS, dichotomized malignancy, LR-5, and LR-M were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.73), 0.63 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.70), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.66), and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.61) respectively. Research-versus-research reader agreement was higher than research-versus-clinical agreement for modified four-category LI-RADS (ICC, 0.68 vs 0.62, respectively; P = .03) and for dichotomized malignancy (ICC, 0.63 vs 0.53, respectively; P = .005), but not for LR-5 (P = .14) or LR-M (P = .94). Conclusion There was moderate agreement for LI-RADS version 2018 overall. For some comparisons, research-versus-research reader agreement was higher than research-versus-clinical reader agreement, indicating differences between the clinical and research environments that warrant further study. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorials by Johnson and Galgano and Smith in this issue.

The value of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced biliary imaging from the hepatobiliary phase for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in HCC patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine the value of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced biliary imaging from the hepatobiliary phase for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Patients with HCC who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging prior to hepatectomy were collected in two centers. The relative enhancement ratio of the biliary system (REB) and the liver to muscle ratio (LMR) were measured at the hepatobiliary phase. Potential risk factors for PHLF were analyzed by logistic regression. The capacity of the REB and LMR to predict PHLF was analyzed via receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Of the 221 patients, post-hepatectomy liver failure occurred in 60 patients (27.1%). The REB was an independent risk factor for PHLF (odds ratio [OR] = 0.127 [0.047-0.348], p < 0.001). Although the LMR tended to be associated with PHLF (p = 0.063), it was not an independent risk factor in the multivariable analysis (OR = 0.624 [0.023-16.709], p = 0.779). Moreover, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the REB and LMR was 0.87 and 0.60. The most appropriate cutoff value for the REB was 2.21. The HCC patients with the REB ≤ 2.21 had a higher incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure than those with the REB > 2.21 (60.0% versus 8.5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced biliary imaging from the hepatobiliary phase was valuable in predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in HCC patients.

KEY POINTS

• The relative enhancement ratio of the biliary system (REB) was an independent risk factor for post-hepatectomy liver failure in HCC patients. • HCC patients with the REB ≤ 2.21 had significantly higher incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure than those with the REB > 2.21 (60.0% versus 8.5%).

A Narrative Review on LI-RADS Algorithm in Liver Tumors: Prospects and Pitfalls

Liver cancer is the sixth most detected tumor and the third leading cause of tumor death worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy with specific risk factors and a targeted population. Imaging plays a major role in the management of HCC from screening to post-therapy follow-up. In order to optimize the diagnostic-therapeutic management and using a universal report, which allows more effective communication among the multidisciplinary team, several classification systems have been proposed over time, and LI-RADS is the most utilized. Currently, LI-RADS comprises four algorithms addressing screening and surveillance, diagnosis on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diagnosis on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and treatment response on CT/MRI. The algorithm allows guiding the radiologist through a stepwise process of assigning a category to a liver observation, recognizing both major and ancillary features. This process allows for characterizing liver lesions and assessing treatment. In this review, we highlighted both major and ancillary features that could define HCC. The distinctive dynamic vascular pattern of arterial hyperenhancement followed by washout in the portal-venous phase is the key hallmark of HCC, with a specificity value close to 100%. However, the sensitivity value of these combined criteria is inadequate. Recent evidence has proven that liver-specific contrast could be an important tool not only in increasing sensitivity but also in diagnosis as a major criterion. Although LI-RADS emerges as an essential instrument to support the management of liver tumors, still many improvements are needed to overcome the current limitations. In particular, features that may clearly distinguish HCC from cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and combined HCC-CCA lesions and the assessment after locoregional radiation-based therapy are still fields of research.

Radiomics Analysis on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI Predicts Response to Transarterial Embolization in Patients with HCC

Objectives: To explore the potential of radiomics on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) response after transarterial embolization (TAE). Methods: This retrospective study included cirrhotic patients treated with TAE for unifocal HCC naïve to treatments. Each patient underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. Radiomics analysis was performed by segmenting the lesions on portal venous (PVP), 3-min transitional, and 20-min hepatobiliary (HBP) phases. Clinical data, laboratory variables, and qualitative features based on LI-RADSv2018 were assessed. Reference standard was based on mRECIST response criteria. Two different radiomics models were constructed, a statistical model based on logistic regression with elastic net penalty (model 1) and a computational model based on a hybrid descriptive-inferential feature extraction method (model 2). Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were calculated. Results: The final population included 51 patients with HCC (median size 20 mm). Complete and objective responses were obtained in 14 (27.4%) and 29 (56.9%) patients, respectively. Model 1 showed the highest performance on PVP for predicting objective response with an AUC of 0.733, sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 40.0% in the test set. Model 2 demonstrated similar performances on PVP and HBP for predicting objective response, with an AUC of 0.791, sensitivity of 71.3%, specificity of 61.7% on PVP, and AUC of 0.790, sensitivity of 58.8%, and specificity of 90.1% on HBP. Conclusions: Radiomics models based on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI can achieve good performance for predicting response of HCCs treated with TAE.

Risk Stratification and Distribution of Hepatocellular Carcinomas in CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS: A Meta-Analysis

Background

CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MRI LI-RADS have been used in clinical practice for several years. However, there is a lack of evidence-based study to compare the proportion of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in each category and the distribution of HCCs of these two categorization systems.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the proportion of HCCs between corresponding CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MRI LI-RADS categories and the distribution of HCCs and non-HCC malignancies in each category.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases from January 2014 to December 2021. The proportion of HCCs and non-HCC malignancies and the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) of the LR-5 and LR-M categories were determined using a random-effect model.

Results

A total of 43 studies were included. The proportion of HCCs in CEUS LR-5 was 96%, and that in CECT/MRI LR-5 was 95% (p > 0.05). The proportion of non-HCC malignancy in CEUS LR-M was lower than that of CT/MRI LR-M (35% vs. 58%, p = 0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS LR-5 for HCCs were 73%, 92%, and 78%, respectively, and of CT/MRI LR-5 for HCCs, 69%, 92%, and 76%, respectively.

Conclusion

With the upshift of the LI-RADS category, the proportion of HCCs increased. CEUS LR-3 has a lower risk of HCCs than CT/MRI LR-3. CEUS LR-5 and CT/MRI LR-5 have a similar diagnostic performance for HCCs. CEUS LR-M has a higher proportion of HCCs and a lower proportion of non-HCC malignancies compared with CT/MRI LR-M.

Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The definition of washout in gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) is controversial. The current Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) defines washout only in the portal venous phase on Gd-EOB-MRI, leading to low diagnostic sensitivity for HCC. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-MRI using conventional (cWO) and modified (mWO) definitions of washout.

METHODS

The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies published between January 1, 2010, and August 1, 2021, that compared the diagnostic performance of cWO and mWO for HCC. The mWOs added transition phase (TP) hypointensity (mWO-1), hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity (mWO-2), or both (mWO-3). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Ten comparative studies with 2391 patients were included. Compared to cWO, the overall mWO yielded significantly higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%, p = 0.00) and lower specificity (97% vs. 93%, p = 0.01) for diagnosing HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.90 and 0.94 for the cWO and mWO, respectively. Regarding the three types of mWOs, mWO-2 showed the highest sensitivity (85%) and specificity (96%) for diagnosing HCC. mWO-2 achieved the highest AUC (0.97), followed by mWO-1 (0.90), and mWO-3 (0.89). Average reviewer experience and scanner field strength were significantly associated with study heterogeneity (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusion of TP and HBP hypointensity in the definition of washout improved the sensitivity with slightly lower specificity for diagnosing HCC in LI-RADS.

KEY POINTS

• Compared to the conventional definition of washout, studies using a modified definition had higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%) but lower specificity (97% vs. 93%) in LI-RADS for the diagnosis of HCC. • Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity may be a preferred alternative washout for HCC diagnosis with the highest area under the curve. • Studies with experienced reviewer or 3.0T MRI showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity for diagnosing HCC when using modified washout (p < 0.05).

Imaging Diagnosis of HCC: Future directions with special emphasis on hepatobiliary MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a unique cancer entity that can be noninvasively diagnosed using imaging modalities without pathologic confirmation. In 2018, several major guidelines for HCC were updated to include hepatobiliary contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (HBA-MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as major imaging modalities for HCC diagnosis. HBA-MRI enables the achievement of high sensitivity in HCC detection using the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). CEUS is another imaging modality with real-time imaging capability, and it is reported to be useful as a second-line modality to increase sensitivity without losing specificity for HCC diagnosis. However, until now, there is an unsolved discrepancy among guidelines on whether to accept “HBP hypointensity” as a definite diagnostic criterion for HCC or include CEUS in the diagnostic algorithm for HCC diagnosis. Furthermore, there is variability in terminology and inconsistencies in the definition of imaging findings among guidelines; therefore, there is an unmet need for the development of a standardized lexicon. In this article, we review the performance and limitations of HBA-MRI and CEUS after guideline updates in 2018 and briefly introduce some future aspects of imaging-based HCC diagnosis.

Comparison of Gadobenate-Enhanced MRI and Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using LI-RADS Version 2018: A Prospective Intraindividual Randomized Study

Background: Gadobenate and gadoxetate demonstrate different degrees of intracellular accumulation within hepatocytes, potentially impacting these agents' relative performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. Objective: To perform an intraindividual comparison of gadobenate-enhanced MRI and gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for detection of HCC, and to assess the impact of inclusion of hepatobiliary phase images on HCC detection for both agents. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 126 patients (112 men, 14 women; mean age 52.3 years) at high risk for HCC who consented to undergo two 3-T liver MRI examinations [one using gadobenate (0.05 mmol/kg), one using gadoxetate (0.025 mmol/kg)], separated by 7-14 days. The order of the two contrast agents was randomized. All examinations included post-contrast dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images (120 minutes for gadobenate; 20 minutes for gadoxetate). Three radiologists independently reviewed the gadobenate and gadoxetate examinations in separate sessions and recorded the location of detected observations. Observations were classified using LI-RADS version 2018 and using a LI-RADS modification whereby hepatobiliary phase hypointensity may upgrade observations from LR-4 to LR-5. Observations classified as LR-5 were considered positive interpretations for HCC. Diagnostic performance for histologically confirmed HCC (n=96) was assessed. Results: Across readers, sensitivity for HCC using dynamic images alone was 74.0%-80.2% for gadobenate versus 54.2%-67.7% for gadoexetate and using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images was 82.1%-87.4% for gadobenate versus 66.3%-81.1% for gadoxetate. For HCCs measuring 1.0-2.0 cm, sensitivity using dynamic images alone was 61.9% (all readers) for gadobenate versus 38.1%-57.1% for gadoxetate and using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images was 76.2%-85.7% for gadobenate versus 52.4%-61.9% for gadoxetate. PPV for HCC ranged from 88.6%-97.4% across readers, agents, and image sets. Conclusion: Sensitivity for HCC was higher for gadobenate than for gadoxetate, whether using dynamic images alone or dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images; the improved sensitivity using gadobenate was more pronounced for small HCCs. While hepatobiliary phase images improved sensitivity for both agents, sensitivity of gadobenate using dynamic images alone compared favorably with that of gadoxetate using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images. Clinical Impact: The findings support gadobenate as a preferred agent over gadoxetate when performing liver MRI in patients at high risk for HCC.