1
|
Müller-Graff FT, Spahn B, Herrmann DP, Kurz A, Völker J, Hagen R, Rak K. Comprehensive literature review on the application of the otological surgical planning software OTOPLAN® for cochlear implantation. HNO 2024:10.1007/s00106-023-01417-4. [PMID: 38861031 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-023-01417-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The size of the human cochlear, measured by the diameter of the basal turn, varies between 7 and 11 mm. For hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI), the size of the cochlear influences the individual frequency map and the choice of electrode length. OTOPLAN® (CAScination AG [Bern, Switzerland] in cooperation with MED-EL [Innsbruck, Austria]) is a software tool with CE marking for clinical applications in CI treatment which allows for precise pre-planning based on cochlear size. This literature review aims to analyze all published data on the application of OTOPLAN®. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied to identify relevant studies published in the PubMed search engine between January 2015 and February 2023 using the search terms "otoplan" [title/abstract] OR "anatomy-based fitting" [title/abstract] OR "otological software tool" [title/abstract] OR "computed tomography-based software AND cochlear" [title/abstract]. RESULTS The systematic review of the literature identified 32 studies on clinical use of OTOPLAN® in CI treatment. Most studies were reported from Germany (7 out of 32), followed by Italy (5), Saudi Arabia (4), the USA (4), and Belgium (3); 2 studies each were from Austria and China, and 1 study from France, India, Norway, South Korea, and Switzerland. In the majority of studies (22), OTOPLAN® was used to assess cochlear size, followed by visualizing the electrode position using postoperative images (5), three-dimensional segmentation of temporal bone structures (4), planning the electrode insertion trajectory (3), creating a patient-specific frequency map (3), planning of a safe drilling path through the facial recess (3), and measuring of temporal bone structures (1). CONCLUSION To date, OTOPLAN® is the only DICOM viewer with CE marking in the CI field that can process pre-, intra-, and postoperative images in the abovementioned applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | - Björn Spahn
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - David P Herrmann
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Anja Kurz
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Völker
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Kristen Rak
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Müller-Graff FT, Spahn B, Herrmann DP, Kurz A, Voelker J, Hagen R, Rak K. [Comprehensive literature review on the application of the otological-surgical planning software OTOPLAN® for cochlear implantation. German version]. HNO 2024:10.1007/s00106-024-01461-8. [PMID: 38587661 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-024-01461-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The size of the human cochlear, measured by the diameter of the basal turn, varies between 7 and 11 mm. For hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI), the size of the cochlear influences the individual frequency map and the choice of electrode length. OTOPLAN® (CAScination AG [Bern, Switzerland] in cooperation with MED-EL [Innsbruck, Austria]) is a software tool with CE marking for clinical applications in CI treatment which allows for precise pre-planning based on cochlear size. This literature review aims to analyze all published data on the application of OTOPLAN®. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied to identify relevant studies published in the PubMed search engine between January 2015 and February 2023 using the search terms "otoplan" [title/abstract] OR "anatomy-based fitting" [title/abstract] OR "otological software tool" [title/abstract] OR "computed tomography-based software AND cochlear" [title/abstract]. RESULTS The systematic review of the literature identified 32 studies on clinical use of OTOPLAN® in CI treatment. Most studies were reported from Germany (7 out of 32), followed by Italy (5), Saudi Arabia (4), the USA (4), and Belgium (3); 2 studies each were from Austria and China, and 1 study from France, India, Norway, South Korea, and Switzerland. In the majority of studies (22), OTOPLAN® was used to assess cochlear size, followed by visualizing the electrode position using postoperative images (5), three-dimensional segmentation of temporal bone structures (4), planning the electrode insertion trajectory (3), creating a patient-specific frequency map (3), planning of a safe drilling path through the facial recess (3), and measuring of temporal bone structures (1). CONCLUSION To date, OTOPLAN® is the only DICOM viewer with CE marking in the CI field that can process pre-, intra-, and postoperative images in the abovementioned applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
| | - Björn Spahn
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - David P Herrmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Anja Kurz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Johannes Voelker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Kristen Rak
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weiss NM, Breitsprecher T, Wozniak M, Bächinger D, Völter C, Mlynski R, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V, Dazert S. Comparing linear and non-linear models to estimate the appropriate cochlear implant electrode array length-are current methods precise enough? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:43-49. [PMID: 37466660 PMCID: PMC10764384 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08064-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In cochlear implantation with flexible lateral wall electrode arrays, a cochlear coverage (CC) range between 70% and 80% is considered ideal for optimal speech perception. To achieve this CC, the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array has to be chosen according to the individual cochlear duct length (CDL). Here, we mathematically analyzed the suitability of different flexible lateral wall electrode array lengths covering between 70% and 80% of the CDL. METHODS In a retrospective cross-sectional study preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) from patients undergoing cochlear implantation was investigated. The CDL was estimated using an otosurgical planning software and the CI electrode array lengths covering 70-80% of the CDL was calculated using (i) linear and (ii) non-linear models. RESULTS The analysis of 120 HRCT data sets showed significantly different model-dependent CDL. Significant differences between the CC of 70% assessed from linear and non-linear models (mean difference: 2.5 mm, p < 0.001) and the CC of 80% assessed from linear and non-linear models (mean difference: 1.5 mm, p < 0.001) were found. In up to 25% of the patients none of the existing flexible lateral wall electrode arrays fit into this range. In 59 cases (49,2%) the models did not agree on the suitable electrode arrays. CONCLUSIONS The CC varies depending on the underlying CDL approximation, which critically influences electrode array choice. Based on the literature, we hypothesize that the non-linear method systematically overestimates the CC and may lead to rather too short electrode array choices. Future studies need to assess the accuracy of the individual mathematical models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora M Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
- International Graduate School of Neuroscience (IGSN), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Tabita Breitsprecher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Martin Wozniak
- MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte Deutschland GmbH, Starnberg, Deutschland
| | - David Bächinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christiane Völter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, "Otto Körner", University, Rostock, Germany
| | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Breitsprecher TM, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Dazert S, Doyle U, Dhanasingh A, Großmann W, Hagen R, Van de Heyning P, Mlynski R, Neudert M, Rajan G, Rak K, Van Rompaey V, Schmutzhard J, Volkenstein S, Völter C, Wimmer W, Zernotti M, Weiss NM. Effect of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth on Speech Perception Outcomes: A Systematic Review. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY OPEN 2023; 3:e045. [PMID: 38516541 PMCID: PMC10950166 DOI: 10.1097/ono.0000000000000045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Objective The suitable electrode array choice is broadly discussed in cochlear implantation surgery. Whether to use a shorter electrode length under the aim of structure preservation versus choosing a longer array to achieve a greater cochlear coverage is a matter of debate. The aim of this review is to identify the impact of the insertion depth of a cochlear implant (CI) electrode array on CI users' speech perception outcomes. Databases Reviewed PubMed was searched for English-language articles that were published in a peer-reviewed journal from 1997 to 2022. Methods A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed to find relevant literature on the impact of insertion depth on speech perception. The review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines of reporting. Studies in both, children and adults with pre- or postlingual hearing loss, implanted with a CI were included in this study. Articles written in languages other than English, literature reviews, meta-analyses, animal studies, histopathological studies, or studies pertaining exclusively to imaging modalities without reporting correlations between insertion depth and speech outcomes were excluded. The risk of bias was determined using the "Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions" tool. Articles were extracted by 2 authors independently using predefined search terms. The titles and abstracts were screened manually to identify studies that potentially meet the inclusion criteria. The extracted information included: the study population, type of hearing loss, outcomes reported, devices used, speech perception outcomes, insertion depth (linear insertion depth and/or the angular insertion depth), and correlation between insertion depth and the speech perception outcomes. Results A total of 215 relevant studies were assessed for eligibility. Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed further. Seven studies found no significant correlation between insertion depth and speech perception outcomes. Fifteen found either a significant positive correlation or a positive effect between insertion depth and speech perception. Only 1 study found a significant negative correlation between insertion depth and speech perception outcomes. Conclusion Although most studies reported a positive effect of insertion depth on speech perception outcomes, one-third of the identified studies reported no correlation. Thus, the insertion depth must be considered as a contributing factor to speech perception rather than as a major decisive criterion. Registration This review has been registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42021257547), available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabita M. Breitsprecher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
- Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Kevin Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Una Doyle
- MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geraete Gesellschaft m.b.H., Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Anandhan Dhanasingh
- MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geraete Gesellschaft m.b.H., Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Wilma Großmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, “Otto Körner,” Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, “Otto Körner,” Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Marcus Neudert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden (oder TU Dresden), Faculty of Medicine (and University Hospital) Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Kristen Rak
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Stefan Volkenstein
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christiane Völter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Division of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sanatorio Allende, Catholic University of Córdoba and National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Nora M. Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neagoș CM, Domuța EM, Vlad AG, Neagoș A. The Role of Imaging Investigations in Evaluation of Cochlear Dimensions in Candidates for Cochlear Implantation-Our Experience. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:2086. [PMID: 38138189 PMCID: PMC10744659 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59122086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The Cochlear implant is the first approved cranial nerve stimulator that works by directly stimulating the cochlear nerve. Various attempts have been made to evaluate the dimensions of the cochlea related to cochlear implantation. The preoperative computed tomographic examination is essential not only in assessing the anatomical aspect of the cochlea, but also in determining its dimensions to choose an appropriate electrode and obtain the best possible audiological performance. Materials and Methods: In the present paper, we aimed to carry out an observational study regarding the role of cochlear measurements in the preoperative evaluation of patients proposed for cochlear implants. The purpose of the study was to measure the cochlea and establish the existence of a correlation between the size of the cochlea and the age and gender of the patients. Results: From the group of 35 examined patients, 54% (n = 19) were male and 46% (n = 16) were female. The average length of the cochlea in the age group 0-4 years is 7.82 mm in the left ear and 7.86 mm in the right ear; in the age group 4-7 years, it is 7.82 mm and 7.94 mm, respectively; for the age group 7-14 years, the dimensions increase to 8.48 mm and 8.77 mm, respectively; and after 14 years, these dimensions reach 9.12 mm and 9.18 mm, respectively. Comparative measurements of the length of the cochlea by age groups show an increase in length with the patient's age, but this increase does not exceed 1.5 mm for both the right and left ears. The measurements of the width of the cochlea, by age group, start from 6.84 mm in the left ear and 6.81 mm in the right ear at 0-4 years, 6.94 mm and 6.97 mm, respectively, in the group 4-7 years, 7.71 mm and 7.55 mm at 7-14 years, and reaching 8.19 mm and 8.12 mm at the age of 14 years and over. Conclusions: From the study carried out, it can be concluded that the evaluation of the dimensions of the cochlea is important for cochlear implantation. The size variables, although small, are still an element to be considered in correlation with the age of the patient and the implanted ear. This increase is statistically insignificant, but it still exists, even if, from a theoretical point of view, it is considered that the dimensions of the cochlea remain constant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Mircea Neagoș
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Emergency County Hospital of Targu Mures, George Emil Palade University of Medicine Pharmacy Science and Technology, 540067 Targu Mures, Romania;
| | - Eugenia Maria Domuța
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania;
| | - Anca Gabriela Vlad
- Intensive Care Department, Emergency County Hospital of Targu Mures, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Adriana Neagoș
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Emergency County Hospital of Targu Mures, George Emil Palade University of Medicine Pharmacy Science and Technology, 540067 Targu Mures, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gatto A, Tofanelli M, Costariol L, Rizzo S, Borsetto D, Gardenal N, Uderzo F, Boscolo-Rizzo P, Tirelli G. Otological Planning Software-OTOPLAN: A Narrative Literature Review. Audiol Res 2023; 13:791-801. [PMID: 37887851 PMCID: PMC10603892 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13050070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The cochlear implant (CI) is a widely accepted option in patients with severe to profound hearing loss receiving limited benefit from traditional hearing aids. CI surgery uses a default setting for frequency allocation aiming to reproduce tonotopicity, thus mimicking the normal cochlea. One emerging instrument that may substantially help the surgeon before, during, and after the surgery is a surgical planning software product developed in collaboration by CASCINATION AG (Bern, Switzerland) and MED-EL (Innsbruck Austria). The aim of this narrative review is to present an overview of the main features of this otological planning software, called OTOPLAN®. The literature was searched on the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The search terms used were "OTOPLAN", "cochlear planning software" "three-dimensional imaging", "3D segmentation", and "cochlear implant" combined into different queries. This strategy yielded 52 publications, and a total of 31 studies were included. The review of the literature revealed that OTOPLAN is a useful tool for otologists and audiologists as it improves preoperative surgical planning both in adults and in children, guides the intraoperative procedure and allows postoperative evaluation of the CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa Gatto
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (A.G.); (N.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Margherita Tofanelli
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (A.G.); (N.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Ludovica Costariol
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (A.G.); (N.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Serena Rizzo
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (A.G.); (N.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Daniele Borsetto
- Department of ENT, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Nicoletta Gardenal
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (A.G.); (N.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Francesco Uderzo
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (A.G.); (N.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (A.G.); (N.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Giancarlo Tirelli
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (A.G.); (N.G.); (G.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Breitsprecher T, Mlynski R, Völter C, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V, Dazert S, Weiss NM. Accuracy of Preoperative Cochlear Duct Length Estimation and Angular Insertion Depth Prediction. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:e566-e571. [PMID: 37550888 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In cochlear implantation with flexible lateral wall electrodes, a cochlear coverage of 70% to 80% is assumed to yield an optimal speech perception. Therefore, fitting the cochlear implant (CI) to the patient's individual anatomy has gained importance in recent years. For these reasons, the optimal angular insertion depth (AID) has to be calculated before cochlear implantation. One CI manufacturer offers a software that allows to visualize the AID of different electrode arrays. Here, it is hypothesized that these preoperative AID models overestimate the postoperatively measured insertion angle. This study aims to investigate the agreement between preoperatively estimated and postoperatively measured AID. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING Single-center tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients undergoing cochlear implantation. INTERVENTION Preoperative and postoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The cochlear duct length was estimated by determining cochlear parameters ( A value and B value), and the AID for the chosen electrode was (i) estimated by elliptic circular approximation by the software and (ii) measured manually postoperatively by detecting the electrode contacts after insertion. RESULTS A total of 80 HRCT imaging data sets from 69 patients were analyzed. The mean preoperative AID estimation was 662.0° (standard deviation [SD], 61.5°), and the mean postoperatively measured AID was 583.9° (SD, 73.6°). In all cases (100%), preoperative AID estimation significantly overestimated the postoperative determined insertion angle (mean difference, 38.1°). A correcting factor of 5% on preoperative AID estimation dissolves these differences. CONCLUSIONS The use of an electrode visualization tool may lead to shorter electrode array choices because of an overestimation of the insertion angle. Applying a correction factor of 0.95 on preoperative AID estimation is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabita Breitsprecher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum,
Germany
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, “Otto Körner,” University Rostock, Germany
| | - Christiane Völter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum,
Germany
| | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum,
Germany
| | - Nora M Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Bochum,
Germany
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- International Graduate School of Neuroscience (IGSN), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Curtis DP, Baumann AN, Jeyakumar A. Variation in cochlear size: A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 171:111659. [PMID: 37459768 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advancements in imaging and implantation technology have invited reexamination of the classic teaching that the human cochlea maintains uniform size across demographics. Yet, studies yield conflicting results and relatively few broad systematic reviews have examined cochlear size variation. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to quantify cochlear variability across eight different measurement categories and suggest normative values and ranges for each with consideration of disease state and gender where possible. METHODS A systematic search was conducted up to October 1, 2022, using the search terms "Cochlea/anatomy and histology"[Mesh]) AND 'size'" with filters "Humans" and "English" across three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Medline). Further inclusion criteria involved reporting of numerical measurements in any of the eight included categories. RESULTS Of the 625 articles manually reviewed for relevance by title and abstract, 91 were selected for full-text review and 33 met all eligibility criteria. 5,791 cochleae were included and weighted means and ranges were calculated: "A" value (defined as the distance from the round window, through the modiolus, to the oppsite lateral wall) = 9.23 mm (8.43-10.4 mm, n = 2559); cochlear duct length (CDL) = 33.04 mm (range 28.2-36.4 mm, n = 2252); cochlear height = 5.14 mm (2.8-6.9 mm, n = 2098); the basal turn lumen diameter = 2.09 mm (1.7-2.2 mm, n = 617); "B" value (defined as perpendicular to "A" value and in the same plane) = 6.52 mm (5.73-6.9 mm, n = 908); width of the basal turn = 6.4 mm (6.22-6.86 mm, n = 356); height of the basal turn = 1.96 mm (1.77-2.56 mm, n = 204); length of the basal turn 21.87 mm (21.03-22.5 mm, n = 384). CONCLUSION A notable size range exists across the eight different cochlear parameters considered and we provide normative values for each measurement. Females tend to have smaller CDL and "A" value than males and the sensorineural hearing loss patients had smaller CDL and "A" value but larger cochlear height than the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anita Jeyakumar
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mercy Bon Secours, Youngstown, OH, 44512, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Paouris D, Kunzo S, Goljerová I. Validation of Automatic Cochlear Measurements Using OTOPLAN ® Software. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13050805. [PMID: 37240975 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Electrode length selection based on case-related cochlear parameters is becoming a standard pre-operative step for cochlear implantation. The manual measurement of the parameters is often time-consuming and may lead to inconsistencies. Our work aimed to evaluate a novel, automatic measurement method. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective evaluation of pre-operative HRCT images of 109 ears (56 patients) was conducted, using a development version of the OTOPLAN® software. Inter-rater (intraclass) reliability and execution time were assessed for manual (surgeons R1 and R2) vs. automatic (AUTO) results. The analysis included A-Value (Diameter), B-Value (Width), H-Value (Height), and CDLOC-length (Cochlear Duct Length at Organ of Corti/Basilar membrane). RESULTS The measurement time was reduced from approximately 7 min ± 2 (min) (manual) to 1 min (AUTO). Cochlear parameters in mm (mean ± SD) for R1, R2 and AUTO, respectively, were A-value: 9.00 ± 0.40, 8.98 ± 0.40 and 9.16 ± 0.36; B-value: 6.81 ± 0.34, 6.71 ± 0.35 and 6.70 ± 0.40; H-value: 3.98 ± 0.25, 3.85 ± 0.25 and 3.76 ± 0.22; and the mean CDLoc-length: 35.64 ± 1.70, 35.20 ± 1.71 and 35.47 ± 1.87. AUTO CDLOC measurements were not significantly different compared to R1 and R2 (H0: Rx CDLOC = AUTO CDLOC: p = 0.831, p = 0.242, respectively), and the calculated intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for CDLOC was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.932) for R1 vs. AUTO; 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.932) for R2 vs. AUTO; and 0.893 (95% CI: 0.809, 0.935) for R1 vs. R2. CONCLUSIONS We observed excellent inter-rater reliability, a high agreement of outcomes, and reduced execution time using the AUTO method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Paouris
- Clinic of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology of the Medical Faculty, National Institute of Children's Diseases, Comenius University, 83340 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Samuel Kunzo
- Clinic of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology of the Medical Faculty, National Institute of Children's Diseases, Comenius University, 83340 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Irina Goljerová
- Clinic of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology of the Medical Faculty, National Institute of Children's Diseases, Comenius University, 83340 Bratislava, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heikkinen AK, Rissanen V, Aarnisalo AA, Nyman K, Sinkkonen ST, Koivisto J. Assessment of subjective image quality, contrast to noise ratio and modulation transfer function in the middle ear using a novel full body cone beam computed tomography device. BMC Med Imaging 2023; 23:51. [PMID: 37038130 PMCID: PMC10084678 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-00996-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi slice computed tomography (MSCT) is the most common used method in middle ear imaging. However, MSCT lacks the ability to distinguish the ossicular chain microstructures in detail resulting in poorer diagnostic outcomes. Novel cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices' image resolution is, on the other hand, better than MSCT resolution. The aim of this study was to optimize imaging parameters of a novel full body CBCT device to obtain optimal contrast to noise ratio (CNR) with low effective dose, and to optimize its clinical usability. METHODS Imaging of five anonymous excised human cadaver temporal bones, the acquisition of the effective doses and the CNR measurements were performed for images acquired on using Planmed XFI® full body CBCT device (Planmed Oy, Helsinki, Finland) with a voxel size of 75 µm. All images acquired from the specimens using 10 different imaging protocols varying from their tube current exposure time product (mAs) and tube voltage (kVp) were analyzed for eight anatomical landmarks and evaluated by three evaluators. RESULTS With the exception of protocol with 90 kVp 100 mAs, all other protocols used are competent to image the finest structures. With a moderate effective dose (86.5 µSv), protocol with 90 kV 450 mAs was chosen the best protocol used in this study. A significant correlation between CNR and clinical image quality of the protocols was observed in linear regression model. Using the optimized imaging parameters, we were able to distinguish even the most delicate middle ear structures in 2D images and produce accurate 3D reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS In this ex vivo experiment, the new Planmed XFI® full body CBCT device produced excellent 2D resolution and easily created 3D reconstructions in middle ear imaging with moderate effective doses. This device would be suitable for middle ear diagnostics and for e.g., preoperative planning. Furthermore, the results of this study can be used to optimize the effective dose by selecting appropriate exposure parameters depending on the diagnostic task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anssi-Kalle Heikkinen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Tauno Palva Laboratory, Head and Neck Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Valtteri Rissanen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Tauno Palva Laboratory, Head and Neck Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Antti A Aarnisalo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Tauno Palva Laboratory, Head and Neck Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kristofer Nyman
- Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Saku T Sinkkonen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Tauno Palva Laboratory, Head and Neck Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juha Koivisto
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thomas JP, Klein H, Haubitz I, Dazert S, Völter C. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of CT- versus MRI-Based Cochlear Duct Length Measurement in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates and Its Impact on Personalized Electrode Array Selection. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040633. [PMID: 37109019 PMCID: PMC10142378 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiological high-resolution computed tomography-based evaluation of cochlear implant candidates’ cochlear duct length (CDL) has become the method of choice for electrode array selection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if MRI-based data match CT-based data and if this impacts on electrode array choice. Methods: Participants were 39 children. CDL, length at two turns, diameters, and height of the cochlea were determined via CT and MRI by three raters using tablet-based otosurgical planning software. Personalized electrode array length, angular insertion depth (AID), intra- and interrater differences, and reliability were calculated. Results: Mean intrarater difference of CT- versus MRI-based CDL was 0.528 ± 0.483 mm without significant differences. Individual length at two turns differed between 28.0 mm and 36.6 mm. Intrarater reliability between CT versus MRI measurements was high (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.929–0.938). Selection of the optimal electrode array based on CT and MRI matched in 90.1% of cases. Mean AID was 629.5° based on the CT and 634.6° based on the MRI; this is not a significant difference. ICC of the mean interrater reliability was 0.887 for the CT-based evaluation and 0.82 for the MRI-based evaluation. Conclusion: MRI-based CDL measurement shows a low intrarater difference and a high interrater reliability and is therefore suitable for personalized electrode array selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Peter Thomas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Johannes Hospital, Cath. St. Paulus Society, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Münster, Johannesstr. 9-17, 44137 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Hannah Klein
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| | - Imme Haubitz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| | - Christiane Völter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787 Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lewis MA, Juliano A, Robson C, Clement E, Nash R, Rajput K, D'Arco F. The spectrum of cochlear malformations in CHARGE syndrome and insights into the role of the CHD7 gene during embryogenesis of the inner ear. Neuroradiology 2023; 65:819-834. [PMID: 36715725 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-023-03118-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We reviewed the genotypes and the imaging appearances of cochleae in CHARGE patients from two large tertiary centres and analysed the observed cochlear anomalies, providing detailed anatomical description and a grading system. The goal was to gain insight into the spectrum of cochlear anomalies in CHARGE syndrome, and thus, in the role of the CHD7 gene in otic vesicle development. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed CT and/or MR imaging of CHARGE patients referred to our institutions between 2005 and 2022. Cochlear morphology was analysed and, when abnormal, divided into 3 groups in order of progressive severity. Other radiological findings in the temporal bone were also recorded. Comparison with the existing classification system of cochlear malformation was also attempted. RESULTS Cochlear morphology in our CHARGE cohort ranged from normal to extreme hypoplasia. The most common phenotype was cochlear hypoplasia in which the basal turn was relatively preserved, and the upper turns were underdeveloped. All patients in the cohort had absent or markedly hypoplastic semicircular canals and small, misshapen vestibules. Aside from a stenotic cochlear aperture (fossette) being associated with a hypoplastic or absent cochlear nerve, there was no consistent relationship between cochlear nerve status (normal, hypoplasia, or aplasia) and cochlear morphology. CONCLUSION Cochlear morphology in CHARGE syndrome is variable. Whenever the cochlea was abnormal, it was almost invariably hypoplastic. This may shed light on the role of CHD7 in cochlear development. Accurate morphological description of the cochlea contributes to proper clinical diagnosis and is important for planning surgical treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond St. London, London, WC1N3JH, UK
| | - Amy Juliano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caroline Robson
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emma Clement
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Robert Nash
- Department of Audiological Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kaukab Rajput
- Department of Audiological Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Felice D'Arco
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond St. London, London, WC1N3JH, UK. felice.d'
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. felice.d'
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bächinger D, Breitsprecher TM, Pscheidl A, Dhanasingh A, Mlynski R, Dazert S, Langner S, Weiss NM. Internal auditory canal volume in normal and malformed inner ears. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 280:2149-2154. [PMID: 36210370 PMCID: PMC10066105 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07676-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
A narrow bony internal auditory canal (IAC) may be associated with a hypoplastic cochlear nerve and poorer hearing performances after cochlear implantation. However, definitions for a narrow IAC vary widely and commonly, qualitative grading or two-dimensional measures are used to characterize a narrow IAC. We aimed to refine the definition of a narrow IAC by determining IAC volume in both control patients and patients with inner ear malformations (IEMs).
Methods
In this multicentric study, we included high-resolution CT (HRCT) scans of 128 temporal bones (85 with IEMs: cochlear aplasia, n = 11; common cavity, n = 2; cochlear hypoplasia type, n = 19; incomplete partition type I/III, n = 8/8; Mondini malformation, n = 16; enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome, n = 19; 45 controls). The IAC diameter was measured in the axial plane and the IAC volume was measured by semi-automatic segmentation and three-dimensional reconstruction.
Results
In controls, the mean IAC diameter was 5.5 mm (SD 1.1 mm) and the mean IAC volume was 175.3 mm3 (SD 52.6 mm3). Statistically significant differences in IAC volumes were found in cochlear aplasia (68.3 mm3, p < 0.0001), IPI (107.4 mm3, p = 0.04), and IPIII (277.5 mm3, p = 0.0004 mm3). Inter-rater reliability was higher in IAC volume than in IAC diameter (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92 vs. 0.77).
Conclusions
Volumetric measurement of IAC in cases of IEMs reduces measurement variability and may add to classifying IEMs. Since a hypoplastic IAC can be associated with a hypoplastic cochlear nerve and sensorineural hearing loss, radiologic assessment of the IAC is crucial in patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
A "gold standard" for quantitatively diagnosing inner ear malformations (IEMs) and a consensus on normative measurements are lacking. Reference ranges and cutoff values of inner ear dimensions may add in distinguishing IEM types. This study evaluates the volumes of the cochlea and vestibular system in different types of IEM. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS High-resolution CT scans of 115 temporal bones (70 with IEM; cochlear hypoplasia [CH]; n = 19), incomplete partition (IP) Types I and III (n = 16), IP Type II with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (Mondini malformation; n = 16), enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome (n = 19), and 45 controls. INTERVENTIONS Volumetry by software-based, semiautomatic segmentation, and 3D reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Differences in volumes among IEM and between IEM types and controls; interrater reliability. RESULTS Compared with controls (mean volume, 78.0 mm3), only CH showed a significantly different cochlear volume (mean volume, 30.2 mm3; p < 0.0001) among all types of IEM. A cutoff value of 60 mm3 separated 100% of CH cases from controls. Compared with controls, significantly larger vestibular system volumes were found in Mondini malformation (mean difference, 22.9 mm3; p = 0.009) and IP (mean difference, 24.1 mm3; p = 0.005). In contrast, CH showed a significantly smaller vestibular system volume (mean difference, 41.1 mm3; p < 0.0001). A good interrater reliability was found for all three-dimensional measurements (ICC = 0.86-0.91). CONCLUSION Quantitative reference values for IEM obtained in this study were in line with existing qualitative diagnostic characteristics. A cutoff value less than 60 mm3 may indicate an abnormally small cochlea. Normal reference values for volumes of the cochlea and vestibular system may aid in diagnosing IEM.
Collapse
|
15
|
[Measuring the cochlea using a tablet-based software package: influence of imaging modality and rater background]. HNO 2022; 70:769-777. [PMID: 35970933 PMCID: PMC9512738 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-022-01208-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cochlear duct length (CDL) is subject to significant individual variation. In the context of cochlear implantation, adapting the electrode array length to the CDL is of potential interest, as it has been associated with improvements in both speech recognition and sound quality. Using a tablet-based software package, it is possible to measure CDL at the level of the organ of Corti (CDLOC) to select appropriate electrode array lengths based on individual cochlear anatomy. OBJECTIVE To identify effects of imaging modality and rater background on CDL estimates. METHODS Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and flat-panel volume CT (fpVCT) scans of 10 patients (20 cochleae) were analyzed using the OTOPLAN software package (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria). Raters were an otorhinolaryngology (ORL) specialist, an ORL resident, and an audiologist. To analyze effects of rater background and imaging modality on CDL measurements, linear mixed models were constructed. RESULTS Measurements showed mean CDLOC(fpVCT) = 36.69 ± 1.78 mm and CDLOC(MRI) = 36.81 ± 1.87 mm. Analyses indicated no significant effect of rater background (F(2, 105) = 0.84; p = 0.437) on CDL estimates. Imaging modality, on the other hand, significantly affected CDL (F (1, 105) = 20.70; p < 0.001), whereby estimates obtained using MRI were 0.89 mm larger than those obtained using fpVCT. CONCLUSION No effect of rater background on CDL estimates could be identified, suggesting that comparable measurements could be obtained by personnel other than specially trained neurootologists. While imaging modality (fpVCT vs. MRI) did impact CDL results, the difference was small and of questionable clinical significance.
Collapse
|
16
|
Van de Heyning PH, Dazert S, Gavilan J, Lassaletta L, Lorens A, Rajan GP, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Tavora-Vieira D, Topsakal V, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Weiss NM, Polak M. Systematic Literature Review of Hearing Preservation Rates in Cochlear Implantation Associated With Medium- and Longer-Length Flexible Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays. Front Surg 2022; 9:893839. [PMID: 36034377 PMCID: PMC9407249 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.893839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe last two decades have demonstrated that preoperative functional acoustic hearing (residual hearing) can be preserved during cochlear implant (CI) surgery. However, the relationship between the electrode array length and postoperative hearing preservation (HP) with lateral wall flexible electrode variants is still under debate.Aims/ObjectivesThis is a systematic literature review that aims to analyze the HP rates of patients with residual hearing for medium-length and longer-length lateral wall electrodes.MethodA systematic literature review methodology was applied following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations to evaluate the HP rates of medium-length and longer-length lateral wall electrodes from one CI manufacturer (medium length FLEX 24, longer length FLEX 28 and FLEX SOFT, MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria). A search using search engine PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) was performed using the search terms “hearing preservation” or “residual hearing” and “cochlear implant” in “All fields.” Articles published only in English between January 01, 2009 and December 31, 2020 were included in the search.ResultsThe HP rate was similar between medium-length (93.4%–93.5%) and longer (92.1%–86.8%) electrodes at 4 months (p = 0.689) and 12 months (p = 0.219). In the medium-length electrode group, patients under the age of 45 years had better HP than patients above the age of 45 years.ConclusionsBoth medium-length and longer electrode arrays showed high hearing preservation rates. Considering the hearing deterioration over time, implanting a longer electrode at primary surgery should be considered, thus preventing the need for future reimplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul H Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Correspondence: Paul H Van de Heyning
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Javier Gavilan
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos, III, (CIBERER-U761), Madrid, Spain
| | - Artur Lorens
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Gunesh P Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland
- Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H Skarzynski
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Dayse Tavora-Vieira
- Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Audiology Department, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels Health Campus, Belgium
| | - Shin-ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nora M Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marek Polak
- Department of Electrophysiology, R&D, MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Van de Heyning P, Roland P, Lassaletta L, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Caversaccio M, Dazert S, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Hagr A, Jablonski GE, Kameswaran M, Kuzovkov V, Leinung M, Li Y, Loth A, Magele A, Mlynski R, Mueller J, Parnes L, Radeloff A, Raine C, Rajan G, Schmutzhard J, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stöver T, Tavora-Viera D, Topsakal V, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Weiss NM, Wimmer W, Zernotti M, Gavilan J. Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events. Front Surg 2022; 9:823219. [PMID: 35402479 PMCID: PMC8987358 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.823219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective The cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion process is a key step in CI surgery. One of the aims of advances in robotic-assisted CI surgery (RACIS) is to realize better cochlear structure preservation and to precisely control insertion. The aim of this literature review is to gain insight into electrode selection for RACIS by acquiring a thorough knowledge of electrode insertion and related complications from classic CI surgery involving a manual electrode insertion process. Methods A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to find relevant literature on electrode tip fold over (ETFO), electrode scalar deviation (ESD), and electrode migration (EM) from both pre-shaped and straight electrode types. Results A total of 82 studies that include 8,603 ears implanted with a CI, i.e., pre-shaped (4,869) and straight electrodes (3,734), were evaluated. The rate of ETFO (25 studies, 2,335 ears), ESD (39 studies, 3,073 ears), and EM (18 studies, 3,195 ears) was determined. An incidence rate (±95% CI) of 5.38% (4.4–6.6%) of ETFO, 28.6% (26.6–30.6%) of ESD, and 0.53% (0.2–1.1%) of EM is associated with pre-shaped electrodes, whereas with straight electrodes it was 0.51% (0.1–1.3%), 11% (9.2–13.0%), and 3.2% (2.5–3.95%), respectively. The differences between the pre-shaped and straight electrode types are highly significant (p < 0.001). Laboratory experiments show evidence that robotic insertions of electrodes are less traumatic than manual insertions. The influence of round window (RW) vs. cochleostomy (Coch) was not assessed. Conclusion Considering the current electrode designs available and the reported incidence of insertion complications, the use of straight electrodes in RACIS and conventional CI surgery (and manual insertion) appears to be less traumatic to intracochlear structures compared with pre-shaped electrodes. However, EM of straight electrodes should be anticipated. RACIS has the potential to reduce these complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Paul Van de Heyning
| | - Peter Roland
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus Atlas
- Ear Sciences Institute Australia, Lions Hearing Clinic, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Brown
- UNC Ear and Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Greg Eigner Jablonski
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Vladislav Kuzovkov
- St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Martin Leinung
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Andreas Loth
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Astrid Magele
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, “Otto Körner” Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Joachim Mueller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany
| | - Lorne Parnes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Andreas Radeloff
- Division of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Research Center of Neurosensory Sciences, University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Chris Raine
- Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Center, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Medical Sciences Department of Health Sciences and Medicine. University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland. Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H. Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Timo Stöver
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of ENT HNS, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shin-Ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nora M. Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Catholic University of Córdoba and National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Javier Gavilan
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|