1
|
Bschleipfer T. [Case-based presentation of the S2e guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 63:431-438. [PMID: 38597947 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02327-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common disease of the lower urinary tract in men. The prevalence increases continuously with increasing age and a chronic progressive course is to be expected. In order to reduce the morbidity of affected patients and to improve their quality of life, the expert panel Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) of the German Society of Urology (DGU) has written a new version of the evidence-based "S2e guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of BPH". Using a current patient case, the contents of the new S2e guideline are illustrated, from diagnosis to the decision-making process for a suitable treatment choice. The case presented here shows the possible complexity and difficulty that can arise in the diagnosis of BPH, the need for further diagnostic steps and the finding of a suitable therapy in order to fulfill the patient's wishes, if possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bschleipfer
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, REGIOMED Klinikum Coburg, Ketschendorfer Straße 33, 96450, Coburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Murad L, Bouhadana D, Nguyen DD, Chughtai B, Zorn KC, Bhojani N, Elterman DS. Treating LUTS in Men with Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Review Article. Drugs Aging 2023; 40:815-836. [PMID: 37556075 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-023-01054-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is a prevalent condition that affects men, primarily toward their old age. The condition is often accompanied by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), which can significantly impair a patient's quality of life and lead to other medical complications. Accurate diagnosis of BPO is essential for effective management of complications secondary to BPO, and treatment plans should be tailored patients, and occasionally according to surgeon experience. As such, this literature review aims to analyze the current available data on male LUTS secondary to BPO by providing a comprehensive overview of relevant studies, as well as the surgical and medical management guidelines from the Canadian Urological Association (CUA), American Urological Association (AUA), and European Association of Urology (EAU). By synthesizing the existing literature, this review purports to summarize the current body of knowledge surrounding BPO and male LUTS, and support healthcare providers in making informed decisions about the management of male LUTS secondary to BPO, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam Murad
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David Bouhadana
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David-Dan Nguyen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bilal Chughtai
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin C Zorn
- Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Naeem Bhojani
- Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Dean S Elterman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gravas S, Gacci M, Gratzke C, Herrmann TRW, Karavitakis M, Kyriazis I, Malde S, Mamoulakis C, Rieken M, Sakalis VI, Schouten N, Speakman MJ, Tikkinen KAO, Cornu JN. Summary Paper on the 2023 European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Management of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Eur Urol 2023; 84:207-222. [PMID: 37202311 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common, often bothersome, and have multifactorial aetiology. OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2023 version of the European Association of Urology guidelines on the management of male LUTS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A structured literature search from 1966 to 2021 selected the articles with the highest certainty evidence. The Delphi technique consensus approach was used to develop the recommendations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The assessment of men with LUTS should be practical. A careful medical history and physical examination are essential. Validated symptom scores, urine test, uroflowmetry, and postvoid urine residual, as well as frequency-volume charts for patients with nocturia or predominately storage symptoms should be used. Prostate-specific antigen should be ordered if a diagnosis of prostate cancer changes the treatment plan. Urodynamics should be performed for selected patients. Men with mild symptoms are candidates for watchful waiting. Behavioural modification should be offered to men with LUTS prior to, or concurrent with, treatment. The choice of medical treatment depends on the assessment findings, predominant type of symptoms, ability of the treatment to change the findings, and the expectations to be met in terms of the speed of onset, efficacy, side effects, and disease progression. Surgery is reserved for men with absolute indications, and for patients who fail or prefer not to receive medical therapy. Surgical management has been divided into five sections: resection, enucleation, vaporisation, and alternative ablative and nonablative techniques. The choice of surgical technique depends on patient's characteristics, expectations, and preferences; surgeon's expertise; and availability of modalities. CONCLUSIONS The guidelines provide an evidence-based approach for the management of male LUTS. PATIENT SUMMARY A clinical assessment should identify the cause(s) of symptoms and define the clinical profile and patient's expectations. The treatment should aim to ameliorate symptoms and reduce the risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Gravas
- Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Markos Karavitakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Iason Kyriazis
- Department of Urology, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Sachin Malde
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charalampos Mamoulakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Vasileios I Sakalis
- Department of Urology, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Natasha Schouten
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J Speakman
- Department of Urology, Taunton & Somerset Hospital, Taunton, UK
| | - Kari A O Tikkinen
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Surgery, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Jean-Nicolas Cornu
- Department of Urology, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen - Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gacci M, Sakalis VI, Karavitakis M, Cornu JN, Gratzke C, Herrmann TRW, Kyriazis I, Malde S, Mamoulakis C, Rieken M, Schouten N, Smith EJ, Speakman MJ, Tikkinen KAO, Gravas S. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Male Urinary Incontinence. Eur Urol 2022; 82:387-398. [PMID: 35697561 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common condition in elderly men causing a severe worsening of quality of life, and a significant cost for both patients and health systems. OBJECTIVE To report a practical, evidence-based, guideline on definitions, pathophysiology, diagnostic workup, and treatment options for men with different forms of UI. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive literature search, limited to studies representing high levels of evidence and published in the English language, was performed. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. A level of evidence and a grade of recommendation were assigned. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS UI can be classified into stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), and mixed urinary incontinence. A detailed description of the pathophysiology and diagnostic workup has been reported. Simple clinical interventions, behavioural and physical modifications, and pharmacological treatments comprise the initial management for all kinds of UI. Surgery for SUI includes bulking agents, male sling, and compression devices. Surgery for UUI includes bladder wall injection of botulinum toxin A, sacral nerve stimulation, and cystoplasty/urinary diversion. CONCLUSIONS This 2022 European Association of Urology guideline summary provides updated information on definition, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of male UI. PATIENT SUMMARY Male urinary incontinence comprises a broad subject area, much of which has been covered for the first time in the literature in a single manuscript. The European Association of Urology Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Guideline Panel has released this new guidance, with the aim to provide updated information for urologists to be able to follow diagnostic and therapeutic indications for optimising patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Gacci
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Vasileios I Sakalis
- Department of Urology, Agios Pavlos General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Markos Karavitakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Jean-Nicolas Cornu
- Department of Urology, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen - Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Iason Kyriazis
- Department of Urology, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Sachin Malde
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charalampos Mamoulakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Natasha Schouten
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Emma J Smith
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J Speakman
- Department of Urology, Taunton & Somerset Hospital, Taunton, UK
| | - Kari A O Tikkinen
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Surgery, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Stavros Gravas
- Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miernik A, Gratzke C. Current Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 117:843-854. [PMID: 33593479 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is characterized by the occurrence of.disorders of urine storage and bladder emptying. Most men over the age of 60 years are affected to some degree. METHODS A selective literature search with additional scrutiny of guidelines and meta-analyses. RESULTS The management of patients with BPH is complex. Emptying and retention disorders can be treated by various pharmacological and surgical means. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has long been considered the gold standard for operative treatment. Transurethral enucleation procedures show a better risk profile in some uses, however, and have, above all, largely displaced suprapubic prostatectomy. Numerous innovative treatment options have been developed in recent years, but their long-term effects remain to be determined. These treatment techniques can nevertheless be used in individual cases after thorough discussion with the patient. CONCLUSION The care of patients with BPH should be interdisciplinary. The efficacy and safety of many new developments in the area of pharmacological and minimally invasive treatment remain to be demonstrated in randomized trials.
Collapse
|
6
|
La Vignera S, Aversa A, Cannarella R, Condorelli RA, Duca Y, Russo GI, Calogero AE. Pharmacological treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia: consequences on sexual function and possible endocrine effects. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 22:179-189. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1817382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro La Vignera
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Aversa
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rossella Cannarella
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Rosita A. Condorelli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Ylenia Duca
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giorgio I. Russo
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Aldo E. Calogero
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Management of Overactive Bladder After Treatment of Bladder Outlet Obstruction. CURRENT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11884-019-00527-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
Zambrano N, Palma C. Tratamiento de la hiperplasia prostática benigna y de la disfunción eréctil por el médico general. REVISTA MÉDICA CLÍNICA LAS CONDES 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmclc.2018.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
9
|
Singapore Urological Association Clinical Guidelines for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Singapore Med J 2017; 58:473-480. [PMID: 28848988 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2017082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The first clinical guidelines for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were published in 2005. An update is urgently needed in view of BPH being recognised as one of ten chronic illnesses by the Ministry of Health, Singapore. This review summarises the definition of BPH and the epidemiology of male LUTS/BPH in Singapore. BPH can be phenotyped with noninvasive transabdominal ultrasonography, according to intravesical prostatic protrusion and prostate volume, and classified according to severity (staging) for individualised treatment. At the initial evaluation, the majority of patients (59%) can be managed with fluid adjustment, exercise and diet; 32% with medications, using alpha blockers and/or 5-alpha reductase inhibitors for prostates weighing more than 30 g; and 9% with surgical intervention for more advanced disease. The 2015 guidelines comprise updated evidence that will help family medicine practitioners and specialists manage this common ailment more cost-effectively.
Collapse
|
10
|
Macey MR, Raynor MC. Medical and Surgical Treatment Modalities for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in the Male Patient Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Review. Semin Intervent Radiol 2016; 33:217-23. [PMID: 27582609 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is one of the most common ailments affecting aging men. Symptoms typically associated with BPH include weak stream, hesitancy, urgency, frequency, and nocturia. More serious complications of BPH include urinary retention, gross hematuria, bladder calculi, recurrent urinary tract infection, obstructive uropathy, and renal failure. Evaluation of BPH includes a detailed history, objective assessment of urinary symptoms with validated questionnaires, and measurement of bladder function parameters, including uroflowmetry and postvoid residual. In general, treatment of LUTS associated with BPH is based on the effect of the symptoms on quality of life (QOL) and include medical therapy aimed at reducing outlet obstruction or decreasing the size of the prostate. If medical therapy fails or is contraindicated, various surgical options exist. As the elderly population continues to grow, the management of BPH will become more common and important in maintaining patient's QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Ryan Macey
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Mathew C Raynor
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yeo JK, Choi H, Bae JH, Kim JH, Yang SO, Oh CY, Cho YS, Kim KW, Kim HJ. Korean clinical practice guideline for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Investig Clin Urol 2016; 57:30-44. [PMID: 26966724 PMCID: PMC4778754 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.1.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2014, the Korean Urological Association organized the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Guideline Developing Committee composed of experts in the field of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with the participation of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine and the Korean Continence Society to develop a Korean clinical practice guideline for BPH. The purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to provide current and comprehensive recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of BPH. The committee developed the guideline mainly by adapting existing guidelines and partially by using the de novo method. A comprehensive literature review was carried out primarily from 2009 to 2013 by using medical search engines including data from Korea. Based on the published evidence, recommendations were synthesized, and the level of evidence of the recommendations was determined by using methods adapted from the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Meta-analysis was done for one key question and four recommendations. A draft guideline was reviewed by expert peer reviewers and discussed at an expert consensus meeting until final agreement was achieved. This evidence-based guideline for BPH provides recommendations to primary practitioners and urologists for the diagnosis and treatment of BPH in men older than 40 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Kyun Yeo
- Department of Urology, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Hun Choi
- Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Bae
- Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Heon Kim
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Seong Ok Yang
- Department of Urology, VHS Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul Young Oh
- Department of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Young Sam Cho
- Department of Urology, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoung Woo Kim
- Department of Family Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Hyung Ji Kim
- Department of Urology, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oelke M, Speakman MJ, Desgrandchamps F, Mamoulakis C. Acute Urinary Retention Rates in the General Male Population and in Adult Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Participating in Pharmacotherapy Trials: A Literature Review. Urology 2015; 86:654-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Revised: 06/08/2015] [Accepted: 06/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Gacci M, Sebastianelli A, Salvi M, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Novara G, De Nunzio C, Tubaro A, Oelke M, Gravas S, Carini M, Serni S. Tolterodine in the Treatment of Male LUTS. Curr Urol Rep 2015; 16:60. [DOI: 10.1007/s11934-015-0531-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
14
|
Cho HJ, Shin SC, Seo DY, Cho JM, Kang JY, Yoo TK, Yu JH, Sung LH, Moon HS. Comparison of alfuzosin 10 mg with or without propiverine 10 mg, 20 mg in men with lower urinary tract symptom and an overactive bladder: randomised, single-blind, prospective study. Int J Clin Pract 2014; 68:471-7. [PMID: 24471868 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The efficacy and safety of treatment with alfuzosin 10 mg plus propiverine 10 or 20 mg in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and an overactive bladder were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this parallel-arm, prospective, multicentre, single-blind study, men who were ≥ 40 years old, had an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of ≥ 8, an Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) of ≥ 3 and an OABSS urgency item score of ≥ 2 were randomised in a 1 : 1 :1 ratio to receive alfuzosin 10 mg alone (Group A) or with propiverine 10 mg (Group B) or 20 mg (Group C) for 8 weeks. Four and 8 weeks after commencing treatment, OABSS was measured along with IPSS, maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax ) and postvoid residual volume (PVR). Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS A total of 135 men, including 43 in Group A, 48 in Group B and 44 in Group C, completed the study. Relative to baseline, all groups demonstrated significant reductions in OABSS and the IPSS after eight treatment weeks (p < 0.005). The improvement of OABSS in Group C was significantly greater than Group A and B (Group A: 0.70 ± 1.94; Group B: 2.50 ± 2.98; Group C: 4.30 ± 3.40; p < 0.005). An observed improvement of Qmax and PVR in the three groups did not achieve statistical significance. Overall adverse event rates were higher in Group C but not significant compared with others. CONCLUSION In patients with LUTS and overactive bladder, combined therapy with alfuzosin 10 mg plus propiverine 20 mg was significantly more effective than alfuzosin monotherapy and propiverine 10 mg combined therapy in terms of improving OABSS while not significantly affecting Qmax or PVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Cho
- Eulji general hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC, N'dow J, Nordling J, de la Rosette JJ. EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 2013; 64:118-40. [PMID: 23541338 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 807] [Impact Index Per Article: 73.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2013] [Accepted: 03/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2013 version of the European Association of Urology guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We conducted a literature search in computer databases for relevant articles published between 1966 and 31 October 2012. The Oxford classification system (2001) was used to determine the level of evidence for each article and to assign the grade of recommendation for each treatment modality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Men with mild symptoms are suitable for watchful waiting. All men with bothersome LUTS should be offered lifestyle advice prior to or concurrent with any treatment. Men with bothersome moderate-to-severe LUTS quickly benefit from α1-blockers. Men with enlarged prostates, especially those >40ml, profit from 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) that slowly reduce LUTS and the probability of urinary retention or the need for surgery. Antimuscarinics might be considered for patients who have predominant bladder storage symptoms. The phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor tadalafil can quickly reduce LUTS to a similar extent as α1-blockers, and it also improves erectile dysfunction. Desmopressin can be used in men with nocturia due to nocturnal polyuria. Treatment with an α1-blocker and 5-ARI (in men with enlarged prostates) or antimuscarinics (with persistent storage symptoms) combines the positive effects of either drug class to achieve greater efficacy. Prostate surgery is indicated in men with absolute indications or drug treatment-resistant LUTS due to benign prostatic obstruction. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the current standard operation for men with prostates 30-80ml, whereas open surgery or transurethral holmium laser enucleation is appropriate for men with prostates >80ml. Alternatives for monopolar TURP include bipolar TURP and transurethral incision of the prostate (for glands <30ml) and laser treatments. Transurethral microwave therapy and transurethral needle ablation are effective minimally invasive treatments with higher retreatment rates compared with TURP. Prostate stents are an alternative to catheterisation for men unfit for surgery. Ethanol or botulinum toxin injections into the prostate are still experimental. CONCLUSIONS These symptom-oriented guidelines provide practical guidance for the management of men experiencing LUTS. The full version is available online (www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/12_Male_LUTS.pdf).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Oelke
- Department of Urology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Strittmatter F, Madersbacher S, Stief CG, Gratzke C. [Medical therapy of lower urinary tract symptoms [corrected]]. Urologe A 2013; 51:1125-36. [PMID: 22782192 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-2943-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) include storage and voiding disorders and should be carefully evaluated before the start of any treatment. Medical therapy is directed at improving symptoms and reducing the risk of progression in order to improve quality of life and prevent complications, such as acute urinary retention, or the need for surgical intervention. Careful assessment of the individual complaints helps to identify the best drug which should be adapted to each individual patient's risk profile. At present, α(1)-adrenoreceptor inhibitors and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and their combination form the gold standard for pharmacological treatment. In addition, anticholinergic agents are increasingly being used as monotherapy or in combination with α1-adrenocepetor inhibitors for patients with predominant storage disorders while phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors may be suitable for patients suffering from LUTS and concomitant erectile dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Strittmatter
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern , Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 München, Deutschland.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kaplan SA, Roehrborn CG, Abrams P, Chapple CR, Bavendam T, Guan Z. Antimuscarinics for treatment of storage lower urinary tract symptoms in men: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract 2011; 65:487-507. [PMID: 21210910 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02611.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite potential benefits, primary care clinicians may avoid using antimuscarinics in men with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms because of safety concerns. To review the efficacy and safety of antimuscarinics, alone or in combination with an α-blocker, for the treatment of men with OAB symptoms, we conducted a systematic review of articles published before 22 July 2010, using PubMed. Data from 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of tolterodine extended release (ER), oxybutynin and solifenacin show that combined antimuscarinic+α-blocker treatment is generally more effective than monotherapy or placebo in men with OAB symptoms. The efficacy and safety of tolterodine ER+α-blocker treatment was not affected by prostate size or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. In men meeting entry criteria for OAB and benign prostatic obstruction trials, tolterodine ER alone was effective selectively in men with prostate size or PSA level below study medians. Incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR) in men receiving antimuscarinics with or without an α-blocker was ≤3% in all of these trials; changes in postvoid residual volume and maximum flow rate did not appear clinically meaningful. Post hoc analyses from double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and prospective studies of fesoterodine, oxybutynin, propiverine, solifenacin and tolterodine also suggest that antimuscarinics are generally safe and efficacious in men. A retrospective database study found that risk of AUR in men was the highest in the first month of treatment and decreased considerably thereafter. Antimuscarinics, alone or with an α-blocker, appear to be efficacious and safe in many men with predominant OAB symptoms or persistent OAB symptoms despite α-blocker or 5-α-reductase inhibitor treatment. However, antimuscarinics are not approved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Monitoring men for AUR is recommended, especially those at increased risk, and particularly within 30 days after starting antimuscarinic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Kaplan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Oelke M, Murgas S, Baumann I, Schnabel F, Michel MC. Efficacy of propiverine ER with or without α-blockers related to maximum urinary flow rate in adult men with OAB: results of a 12-week, multicenter, non-interventional study. World J Urol 2011; 29:217-23. [PMID: 21327673 PMCID: PMC3062756 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0654-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2011] [Accepted: 01/24/2011] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Comparison of efficacy of propiverine extended release (ER) 30 mg o.d. in the treatment of male OAB administered as monotherapy (MT) or add-on to α-blockers (combination treatment, CT) in relation to maximum urinary flow (Qmax) in a non-interventional study. Methods Men ≥40 years with OAB symptoms, Qmax ≥10 ml/s, prostate volume <40 ml, post-void residuals (PVR) <100 ml, and IPSS <20 were included. OAB symptoms, IPSS, and PVR were recorded before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Participants were stratified by Qmax (group A ≥15 ml/s, group B <15 ml/s) and CT vs. MT. Safety parameters were monitored. Results A total of 2,219 men participated and were involved in safety analysis; 1,849 men (mean age 66 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were involved in efficacy analysis. In group A, 291 men received MT and 479 CT; in group B, 184 men received MT and 895 CT. OAB symptoms improved significantly in all groups throughout the study without differences between MT and CT. IPSS improvement in group B was less with MT than with CT (−3.9 vs. −5.2; P < 0.001), whereas IPSS improvement was similar in group A (−4.6 vs. −5.1). Mean PVR change was not clinically relevant, but two men (0.1%) experienced urinary retention. Conclusions Under real-life conditions, treatment of OAB symptoms with propiverine ER is equally effective in men with MT or CT regardless of baseline Qmax. In men with reduced Qmax, IPSS improvement is significantly smaller with MT. The incidence of urinary retention during propiverine ER treatment is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Oelke
- Department of Urology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Trospium Chloride Extended-release in Male Patients With Overactive Bladder. Urology 2011; 77:24-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2010] [Revised: 07/02/2010] [Accepted: 07/17/2010] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
20
|
Chapple CR, Herschorn S, Abrams P, Wang JT, Brodsky M, Guan Z. Efficacy and safety of tolterodine extended-release in men with overactive bladder symptoms treated with an α-blocker: effect of baseline prostate-specific antigen concentration. BJU Int 2010; 106:1332-8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09359.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
21
|
Roosen A, Blake-James BT, Wood D, Fry CH. Clinical and experimental aspects of Adreno-muscarinic synergy in the bladder base and prostate. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 28:938-43. [PMID: 19618452 DOI: 10.1002/nau.20742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Recent clinical trials have shown that combination therapy using an alpha-receptor antagonist and an antimuscarinic is more effective than either agent alone in improving quality of life and objective urodynamic variables in men with bladder outflow obstruction. There appear to be no negative effects on bladder function. The mode of action of this combination is unknown but presumed to be an antimuscarinic reduction in detrusor overactivity and the alpha-receptor antagonist reduced outflow tract resistance. We have shown with in vitro experiments that in smooth muscles influencing outflow tract resistance (prostate, trigone) there is a profound contractile synergy between adrenergic and muscarinic pathways. We propose the hypothesis that both arms of the combination therapy reduce contractile tone of the outflow tract and that their simultaneous attenuation has a disproportionately large effect on outflow tract resistance. Our data from trigone muscle suggest that adrenergic and muscarinic receptor activation increase the intracellular [Ca(2+)] but the adrenergic pathway also operates through Ca(2+)-sensitisation of the contractile apparatus, primarily through a PKC-dependent pathway.
Collapse
|
22
|
Antimuscarinics in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Opin Urol 2010; 20:43-8. [DOI: 10.1097/mou.0b013e3283330862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
23
|
|