1
|
Pfail J, Lichtbroun B, Golombos DM, Jang TL, Packiam VT, Ghodoussipour S. The role of radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy in the management of bladder cancer with clinically positive lymph node involvement. Curr Opin Urol 2025; 35:115-122. [PMID: 39350629 PMCID: PMC11617270 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The role of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with clinically positive lymph nodes is debated. This review examines the role of surgery in treating patients with clinical N1 and more advanced nodal involvement (N2-N3) within a multimodal treatment approach. RECENT FINDINGS For clinical N1 disease, guidelines typically recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, for N2-N3 disease, guidelines vary. Advances in diagnostics, systemic therapies, and surgical recovery have improved the prognosis for these patients. Research is increasingly identifying MIBC patients, including those with positive nodes, who may achieve complete pathologic response and long-term survival, supporting the role of surgery even in advanced nodal stages. SUMMARY Managing MIBC with clinically positive lymph nodes, especially in N2-N3 disease, requires a tailored approach. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is standard for N1 disease, the role of surgery in advanced nodal stages is growing because of better patient selection and treatment strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that consolidative surgery may improve outcomes in these complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Pfail
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Benjamin Lichtbroun
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - David M. Golombos
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas L. Jang
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Vignesh T. Packiam
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grobet-Jeandin E, Lenfant L, Pinar U, Parra J, Mozer P, Renard-Penna R, Thibault C, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. Management of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with clinical evidence of pelvic lymph node metastases. Nat Rev Urol 2024; 21:339-356. [PMID: 38297079 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00842-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Identification of clinically positive pelvic lymph node metastases (cN+) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is currently challenging, as the diagnostic accuracy of available imaging modalities is limited. Conventional CT is still considered the gold-standard approach to diagnose lymph node metastases in these patients. The development of innovative diagnostic methods including radiomics, artificial intelligence-based models and molecular biomarkers might offer new perspectives for the diagnosis of cN+ disease. With regard to the treatment of these patients, multimodal strategies are likely to provide the best oncological outcomes, especially using induction chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in responders to chemotherapy. Additionally, the use of adjuvant nivolumab has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence in patients who still harbour ypT2-T4a and/or ypN+ disease after surgery. Alternatively, the use of avelumab maintenance therapy can be offered to patients with unresectable cN+ tumours who have at least stable disease after induction chemotherapy alone. Lastly, patients with cN+ tumours who are not responding to induction chemotherapy are potential candidates for receiving second-line treatment with pembrolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Grobet-Jeandin
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Louis Lenfant
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Pinar
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Parra
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mozer
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Raphaele Renard-Penna
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Radiology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of medical oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP centre, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Urology, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
von Deimling M, Furrer M, Mertens LS, Mari A, van Ginkel N, Bacchiani M, Maas M, Pichler R, Li R, Moschini M, Bianchi A, Vetterlein MW, Lonati C, Crocetto F, Taylor J, Tully KH, Afferi L, Soria F, Del Giudice F, Longoni M, Laukhtina E, Antonelli A, Rink M, Fisch M, Lotan Y, Spiess PE, Black PC, Kiss B, Pradere B, Shariat SF. Impact of the extent of lymph node dissection on survival outcomes in clinically lymph node-positive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024; 133:341-350. [PMID: 37904652 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the oncological impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) vs standard PLND (sPLND) during radical cystectomy (RC) in clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective, multicentre study we included 969 patients who underwent RC with sPLND (internal/external iliac and obturator lymph nodes) or ePLND (sPLND plus common iliac and presacral nodes) with or without platin-based peri-operative chemotherapy for cTany N1-3 M0 BCa between 1991 and 2022. We assessed the impact of ePLND on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the distribution of recurrences (locoregional and distant recurrences). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). We performed propensity-score matching using covariates associated with the extent of PLND in univariable logistic regression analysis. The association of the extent of PLND with RFS and OS was investigated using Cox regression models. RESULTS Of 969 cN+ patients, 510 were 1:1 matched on propensity scores. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to recurrence was 8 (4-16) months, and median (IQR) follow-up of alive patients was 30 (13-51) months. Disease recurrence was observed in 104 patients in the ePLND and 107 in the sPLND group. Of these, 136 (27%), 47 (9.2%) and 19 patients (3.7%) experienced distant, locoregional, or both distant and locoregional disease recurrence, respectively. When stratified by the extent of PLND, we did not find a difference in recurrence patterns (P > 0.05). ePLND improved neither RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.19; P = 0.5) nor OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60-1.01; P = 0.06) compared to sPLND. Stratification by induction chemotherapy did not change outcomes. CONCLUSION Performing an ePLND at the time of RC in cN+ patients improved neither RFS nor OS compared to sPLND, regardless of induction chemotherapy status. Pretreatment risk stratification is paramount to identify ideal candidates for RC with ePLND as part of a multimodal treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Furrer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Olten, Solothurn, Switzerland
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Noor van Ginkel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mara Bacchiani
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Moritz Maas
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Malte W Vetterlein
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chiara Lonati
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Jacob Taylor
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Karl H Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bernhard Kiss
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Urosud, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meagher M, Morgan KM, Deshler L, Puri D, Yuen K, Bagrodia A, Rose B, Stewart T, Salmasi A. The Role of Radical Cystectomy in Clinically Node Positive Bladder Cancer: A US Veterans Health Administration Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102055. [PMID: 38458889 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of local definitive therapy in addition to systemic treatment in clinically positive regional lymph node (cN+) bladder cancer is yet to be determined. Herein, we sought to investigate the role of radical cystectomy (RC) in management of patients with cN+ bladder cancer at US Veterans Health Administration Facilities. METHODS We identified patients diagnosed with cN+ bladder cancer between 2000-2017 using the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI). We employed a combination of database/registry coded values and chart review for data collection. To minimize mortality bias, we excluded patients who died within 90 days of diagnosis. We divided the patients into cystectomy (C) versus "no cystectomy" (NOC) cohorts. Propensity score matching was performed based on predictors of undergoing RC. Multivariable Cox models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CCS). RESULT After matching, 158 patients were included in the C and NOC groups. In the C-group, 85(54%) patients received pre-cystectomy chemotherapy, and 73(46%) patients underwent post-cystectomy chemotherapy. In the C-group, 65(41%) patients and in the NOC-group, 66(42%) patients had clinical N1 disease (P = .77). In multivariable Cox model, undergoing RC was associated with improved OS (HR0.62; 95%CI 0.47-0.81), P < .001) and CSS (HR0.58; 95%CI 0.42-0.80; P < .001). CONCLUSION As part of multimodal treatment, undergoing RC was associated with improved OS and CSS in subset of patients with cN+ bladder cancer. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to further investigate the role of local definitive therapy in this specific patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kylie M Morgan
- Department of Radiation and Applied Medicine, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA; VHA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA Affairs Hospital, San Diego, CA; Center for Health Equity, Education, and Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Leah Deshler
- Department of Radiation and Applied Medicine, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA; VHA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA Affairs Hospital, San Diego, CA; Center for Health Equity, Education, and Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Dhruv Puri
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Kit Yuen
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Brent Rose
- Department of Radiation and Applied Medicine, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA; VHA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, CA Affairs Hospital, San Diego, CA; Center for Health Equity, Education, and Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Małkiewicz B, Gurwin A, Karwacki J, Nagi K, Knecht-Gurwin K, Hober K, Łyko M, Kowalczyk K, Krajewski W, Kołodziej A, Szydełko T. Management of Bladder Cancer Patients with Clinical Evidence of Lymph Node Invasion (cN+). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5286. [PMID: 36358705 PMCID: PMC9656528 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to present the current knowledge about the diagnostic and treatment options for bladder cancer (BCa) patients with clinically positive lymph nodes (cN+). This review shows compaction of CT and MRI performance in preoperative prediction of lymph node invasion (LNI) in BCa patients, along with other diagnostic methods. Most scientific societies do not distinguish cN+ patients in their guidelines; recommendations concern muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and differ between associations. The curative treatment that provides the best long-term survival in cN+ patients is a multimodal approach, with a combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and radical cystectomy (RC) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) remains uncertain; however, emerging evidence indicates comparable outcomes to NAC. Therefore, in cN+ patients who have not received NAC, AC should be implemented. The response to ChT is a crucial prognostic factor for cN+ patients. Recent studies demonstrated the growing importance of immunotherapy, especially in ChT-ineligible patients. Moreover, immunotherapy can be suitable as adjuvant therapy in selected cases. In cN+ patients, the extended template of PLND should be utilized, with the total resected node count being less important than the template. This review is intended to draw special attention to cN+ BCa patients, as the oncological outcomes are significantly worse for this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Adam Gurwin
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Krystian Nagi
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Klaudia Knecht-Gurwin
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Hober
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Magdalena Łyko
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kamil Kowalczyk
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Anna Kołodziej
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lim AH, Westerman ME, Korokovic A, Matulay JT, Narayan VM, Navai N. Efficacy of Surgery on the Primary Tumour in Patients with Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Bladder Cancer 2022; 8:193-209. [PMID: 38993364 PMCID: PMC11181818 DOI: 10.3233/blc-211529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic bladder cancer is unknown. OBJECTIVE Perform a comprehensive contemporary literature review on the benefit of surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic bladder cancer. METHODS Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 1, 1990 to April 20, 2020 were queried for relevant articles published in English. Each article was evaluated by at least two content experts prior to inclusion which were blinded to the other's evaluation. A third content expert was used when there was not a unanimous decision. Additional articles were added at the discretion of the authors. RESULTS Long-term survival is possible in patients with initially unresectable and/or limited metastatic disease. Multi-modal therapy with chemotherapy and surgery have the most favorable outcomes when compared to single treatment modalities in selected populations. Patients who demonstrate a robust response to pre-surgical therapy are likely to benefit the most from consolidative surgery. Patients with distant metastatic disease may benefit from consolidative surgery; however, this benefit may only be seen in those with metastatic disease limited to one site. CONCLUSIONS Surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic bladder cancer either in the setting of surgery alone, consolidative therapy or coupled with adjuvant therapy may be beneficial in well selected patients and should generally be limited to those who have a response to primary chemotherapy. Randomized clinical control trials are needed to further our understanding of the role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy H Lim
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary E Westerman
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Korokovic
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Justin T Matulay
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vikram M Narayan
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neema Navai
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elbakry AA, Trump T, Ferari C, Mattes MD, Luchey A. Survival outcomes in node-positive non-metastatic bladder cancer: An analysis of the national cancer database. Arab J Urol 2022; 20:175-181. [PMID: 36353472 PMCID: PMC9639493 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2022.2077001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Clinically node-positive non-metastatic bladder cancer (cN+) has been the target of several studies aiming to establish a standard of care for this population. Limited studies have shown a survival benefit for various multimodal therapy approaches. The role of radiation therapy has not been well established. Our study aims to study the trends of the reported treatment options offered to patients with cN+ bladder cancer in a national database and to evaluate the effect of various treatments, including radiation, on survival. Methods The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify cN+ bladder cancer patients who received chemotherapy alone or in combination with radical cystectomy (RC) or radiotherapy. 3,481 patients were included and divided into 4 groups: chemotherapy only, chemotherapy and RC, chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, RC, and radiation therapy. Demographic data was compared using ANOVA for continuous variables, and Chi-square for categorical variables. Multivariable analysis was done to compare groups using a multinomial logistic regression model. Kaplan-Meier test was used for survival analysis and Cox-Regression was used for multivariable survival analysis. Results Patients undergoing RC were significantly younger (P <0.001). There was a significant difference between the groups regarding racial distribution, facility-type and insurance status. There was no difference in gender, Charlson\Deyo score, financial or educational status. Patients who underwent combination therapy with chemotherapy and RC were found to have the longest median survival time at 27 months. Multivariable analysis showed that final treatment, age, sex, Charlson\Deyo comorbidity score, TNM edition and facility-type were significant survival predictors. Race, insurance and financial status failed to maintain significance. There was no survival difference between the chemotherapy group and chemo-radiotherapy group. Conclusions The combination of surgery and chemotherapy achieves statistically significant superior survival in cN+ bladder cancer. Adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy did not improve survival in this group of patients. Abbreviations (cN+): Clinically node-positive non-metastatic, (MIBC): Muscle invasive bladder cancer, (NCDB): National Cancer Database, (NAC): Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (RC): Radical Cystectomy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr A Elbakry
- Department of Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Tyler Trump
- Department of Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | | | - Malcom D Mattes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Adam Luchey
- Department of Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lonati C, Mordasini L, Afferi L, De Cobelli O, Di Trapani E, Necchi A, Colombo R, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Simeone C, Zamboni S, Simone G, Karnes RJ, Marra G, Soria F, Gontero P, Shariat SF, Pradere B, Hendricksen K, Ammiwala M, Rink M, Poyet C, Krajewski W, Baumeister P, Mattei A, Moschini M, Carando R. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative lymph node staging of bladder cancer according to different lymph node locations: A multicenter cohort from the European Association of Urology - Young Academic Urologists. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:195.e27-195.e35. [PMID: 35236621 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The preoperative lymph node (LN) staging of bladder cancer (BCa) addresses the subsequent therapeutic strategy and influences patient's prognosis. However, sparce evidence exists regarding the accuracy of conventional cross-sectional imaging, such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, in correctly detect LN status. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of conventional cross-sectional imaging in detecting preoperative LN involvement among BCa patients treated with radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data of 1,104 patients who underwent preoperative LN staging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for BCa between 1997 and 2017 at three tertiary referral centers. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We assessed the concordance between clinical (cN) and pathological LN (pN) status, defined as the accuracy of imaging in detecting LN involvement using pathological specimen as reference; concordance was expressed according to Cohen's kappa coefficient. Location-based sub-analyses were performed, distinguishing among external iliac, intern iliac, obturator, common iliac, presacral and paraaortic LNs. RESULTS Among 870 cN0 patients, 68.9% were confirmed pN0 at pathological report; while among 234 cN+ patients, 50.5% were found with LN metastases at pathological specimen. Overall, conventional imaging showed slight concordance (64.9%) between cN and pN stages (sensitivity: 30%; specificity: 84%). At sub-analysis, no agreement between cN and pN status was found in each LN location, with the only exception of common iliac LNs with slight concordance (37.5%). Common iliac LNs achieved the highest sensitivity and positive likelihood ratio (15% and 2.4, respectively) compared to other LN locations. CONCLUSIONS Overall, preoperative cross-sectional imaging exhibited a slight concordance between cN and pN status. Our location-based sub-analyses showed unsatisfactory results in each LN location- Thus, nomograms combining morphological patterns with serological and clinicopathological features are urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Lonati
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Livio Mordasini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ettore Di Trapani
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Renzo Colombo
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Simeone
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefania Zamboni
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Hospital Motol, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, Francois Rabelais University, Tours, France
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maida Ammiwala
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cédric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncological Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | | | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Carando
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland; Clinica S.Anna, Swiss Medical Group, Sorengo, Switzerland; Clinica Santa Chiara, Locarno, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hospital variation in treatment patterns and oncological outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer in the Netherlands. World J Urol 2022; 40:1469-1479. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03987-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
10
|
Huang J, Li C, Zhang W, Yang F, Wang R, Zhang J, Li W, Yao X. SULF2 is a novel diagnostic and prognostic marker for high-grade bladder cancer with lymphatic metastasis. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1439. [PMID: 34733991 PMCID: PMC8506778 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-4102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Sulfatase 2 (SULF2) is a member of the sulfatase family, and its expression and clinical significance in bladder cancer (BCa) are not currently known. In this study, we attempted to evaluate SULF2 expression in BCa patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) and the relationship between SULF2 expression and clinical-pathological characteristics. Methods Data on SULF2 expression in BCa tissues was obtained from the Oncomine database and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The expression of SULF2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-D (VEGF-D) in BCa was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tissues from 203 patients who had undergone RC. We also explored the value of the measurement of SULF2 and VEGF-D expression for diagnosis and prognosis in BCa patients with lymphatic metastasis. Results We found an increase in SULF2 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels and gene amplification in BCa tissues from the Oncomine database. High expression of SULF2 was detected in 91/203 (44.8%) of BCa patients. Among these patients, 27 of 42 (64.3%) with lymphatic metastasis showed high SULF2 expression. Univariate analysis showed that tumor size, pathological stage, lymphatic metastasis, vascular infiltration, perineural infiltration, hydronephrosis, and VEGF-D and SULF2 expression were related to prognosis in BCa patients, and multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that SULF2 expression was an independent prognostic indicator. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that SULF2 expression resulted in an increased area under the curve (AUC) of 0.707, with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 61.5%. Conclusions The upregulation of SULF2 is associated with poor prognosis in high-grade BCa patients. It might be a novel diagnostic marker for BCa patients with lymphatic metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhua Huang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Urinary Oncology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng Li
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Urinary Oncology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wentao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Urinary Oncology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fuhan Yang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Urinary Oncology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruiliang Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Urinary Oncology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Junfeng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Urinary Oncology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Urinary Oncology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xudong Yao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Urinary Oncology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Surgical intervention in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and lymph node metastasis. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:220-225. [PMID: 33742983 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To systematically review the most recent evidence on the role of surgery in patients with urothelial carcinoma of bladder and lymph node metastasis. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with urothelial carcinoma of bladder and lymph node metastasis have a poor prognosis. The mainstay treatment for these patients is systemic chemotherapy. However, slowly growing body of literature suggests that multimodal therapy comprised of radical cystectomy, lymph node dissection, and perioperative chemotherapy is more effective than either chemotherapy or surgery alone. The timing of chemotherapy, whether preoperative or adjuvant chemotherapy, is still controversial, but the current evidence indicates that patients who achieve a major or complete response after induction chemotherapy appear to benefit from the surgical intervention in the form of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. The limit of lymph node dissection has to be determined. SUMMARY Multimodal therapy is associated with better survival outcomes in bladder cancer patients with lymph node metastasis. The current guidelines recommend systemic chemotherapy as the mainstay of treatment for these patients, and there is no convincing evidence on the efficacy of surgical intervention in isolation. Nonetheless, studies comparing multiple treatment modalities demonstrated that surgical salvage therapy is beneficial only when combined with chemotherapy. The methodological limitations of the current literature preclude a robust conclusion of survival advantage. Further studies are needed to help improve imaging for detecting lymph node metastasis and novel strategies to enrich our multimodal therapeutic implementation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Management of Clinically Regional Node-Positive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:24. [PMID: 33559760 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01018-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Clinically regional node-positive (cN+) urothelial carcinoma of the bladder requires a multi-modal management approach amidst growing recognition that it represents a spectrum of disease. Herein, we review the contemporary evidence for the natural history, evaluation, and management of clinically regional node-positive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, highlighting recent changes in lymph node staging. RECENT FINDINGS Despite advances in techniques, cross-sectional imaging remains relatively insensitive for the detection of lymph node metastases. Recent changes to nodal staging that distinguish between cN1, cN2-3, and non-regional lymph node metastases reflect an increasing understanding that node-positive disease is heterogeneous and its management must be individualized according to nodal staging. Systemic therapy remains the initial management strategy, either alone or in conjunction with radiotherapy, with choice and sequencing of agents extrapolated from studies of metastatic disease. Consolidative radical cystectomy is an option for patients with disease response to upfront systemic therapy, and several series demonstrate a subset of patients with favorable oncologic outcomes. The comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy and radical cystectomy as local therapy remains an important evidence gap. Future studies that identify predictive biomarkers will help inform optimal choice of systemic therapy. The management of clinically regional node-positive disease requires a multimodal approach comprising both systemic and local therapy, tailored to the patient and to disease response. While choice of systemic therapy will be informed by ongoing studies in patients with metastatic disease, including the elucidation of predictive biomarkers, the comparative effectiveness of local therapies remains an important evidence gap.
Collapse
|
13
|
Immune checkpoint inhibition in muscle-invasive and locally advanced bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2020; 30:547-556. [PMID: 32453001 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been implemented in the treatment algorithm of metastatic urothelial cancer as they have shown higher and more sustained responses compared with conventional second-line chemotherapy. Recently, several clinical trials have reported on CPIs in earlier disease stages such as muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This review summarizes ongoing clinical trials and results from early phase clinical trials in muscle invasive and locally advanced bladder cancer. RECENT FINDINGS In phase II clinical trials, neoadjuvant use of CPIs as mono and combination therapy, in patients with MIBC planned for radical cystectomy, has shown promising pathological complete response rates. Whether this will translate in survival benefit remains to be assessed. Combination of CPIs and conventional chemotherapy or other targeted agents promises to increase the efficacy of perioperative systemic therapy with potentially additive toxicities. Recently, preclinical models of combined trimodal therapy with CPIs delivered the proof of principle leading to several ongoing trials in this setting. SUMMARY First results of clinical trials evaluating CPIs in MIBC demonstrate very promising results that warrant further investigation as they could revolutionize management of MIBC in the near future. The trend and hope are toward higher rates of safe and sustained bladder preservation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Howard JM, Margulis V, Woldu SL. Clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients with bulky, clinically node-positive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy in the contemporary era. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 15:E286-E289. [PMID: 33119506 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey M Howard
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Afferi L, Zamboni S, Karnes RJ, Roghmann F, Sargos P, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gallina A, Mattei A, Schulz GB, Hendricksen K, Voskuilen CS, Rink M, Poyet C, De Cobelli O, di Trapani E, Simeone C, Soligo M, Simone G, Tuderti G, Alvarez-Maestro M, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Aziz A, Shariat SF, Abufaraj M, Xylinas E, Moschini M. The impact of treatment modality on survival in patients with clinical node-positive bladder cancer: results from a multicenter collaboration. World J Urol 2020; 39:443-451. [PMID: 32356226 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03205-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival in cN+ BCa patients and analyze it according to the pN status. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 639 BCa patients with cTanyN1-3M0 BCa treated with radical cystectomy (RC) and bilateral lymph node dissection (LND) with or without perioperative chemotherapy in ten tertiary referral centers from 1990 to 2017. Selected cN+ patients received induction chemotherapy (IC), whereas adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was delivered to selected pN+ patients. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to predict overall mortality (OM) after surgery, adjusting for clinicopathological confounders. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed OM according to the treatment modality. RESULTS Overall, 356 (56%) patients were treated with surgery alone, 155 (24%) with IC followed by surgery, and 128 (20%) with ACT following surgery. Over a median follow-up of 25 months, 316 deaths were recorded. At univariable analysis, patients treated with IC and surgery had lower OM both considering cN+ [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.87, p = 0.004] and cN+pN- patients (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.99, p = 0.05) compared to those treated with surgery alone. cN+pN+ patients treated with ACT experienced lower OM compared to those treated with IC or surgery alone at multivariable analysis (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.74, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION Patients with cTany cN+ cM0 BCa benefit more in terms of OS when treated with IC followed by RC + LND compared to RC + LND alone, regardless of LNMs at final histopathology examination. More data are needed to assess the role of ACT in the management of cN+ patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Stefania Zamboni
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Gerald Bastian Schulz
- Urologische Klinik Und Poliklinik, Klinikum Der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte S Voskuilen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cedric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Claudio Simeone
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Alvarez-Maestro
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Martínez-Piñeiro
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Atiqullah Aziz
- Department of Urology, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- The National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology Bichat Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stabile A, Muttin F, Zamboni S, Moschini M, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Dell’Oglio P, Capitanio U, Cucchiara V, Mazzone E, Bravi CA, Mirone V, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Therapeutic approaches for lymph node involvement in prostate, bladder and kidney cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:739-755. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1659135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Armando Stabile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Muttin
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Zamboni
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell’Oglio
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo A. Bravi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Urology, University of Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Upfront Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Clinically Node-positive Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:e420-e428. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
18
|
Frączek M, Kamecki H, Kamecka A, Sosnowski R, Sklinda K, Czarniecki M, Królicki L, Walecki J. Evaluation of lymph node status in patients with urothelial carcinoma-still in search of the perfect imaging modality: a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:783-803. [PMID: 30456182 PMCID: PMC6212628 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
While accurate lymph node status evaluation in urothelial carcinoma patients is essential for the correct disease staging and, hence, establishing the most beneficial treatment strategy, the diagnostic performance of routine imaging in regards to this issue is not satisfactory. For the purpose of this article, we systematically reviewed the contemporary literature on the sensitivity and specificity of particular imaging modalities which have been studied for detecting lymph node metastases in patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma. The evidence reviewed shows that computed tomography (CT), although recognized as the imaging modality of choice, is associated with marked limitations, resulting in its low sensitivity for lymph node involvement detection in urothelial carcinoma patients, with no study reporting a value higher than 46% using standard cut-off values. Markedly higher sensitivity rates may be achieved with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially when using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide as the contrast agent, however, no uniform protocol has been systematically studied up to date. The vast majority of recent evidence concerns positron emission tomography (PET), which is being reported to improve the diagnostic performance of CT alone, as has been demonstrated in multiple articles, which investigated the accuracy of PET/CT at primary or post-treatment staging of urothelial carcinoma patients. However, there has been substantial heterogeneity in terms of methodology and results between those studies, making it premature to draw any definitive conclusions. The results of this review lead to a conclusion, that while CT, despite being not fully satisfactory, still remains the gold-standard method of imaging for staging purposes in urothelial carcinoma, other imaging modalities are under investigation, with promising results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Frączek
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Hubert Kamecki
- Department of Urogenital Cancer, Oncology Center-M. Skłodowska-Curie Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Kamecka
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Public Children's Teaching Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Roman Sosnowski
- Department of Urogenital Cancer, Oncology Center-M. Skłodowska-Curie Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Sklinda
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marcin Czarniecki
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Leszek Królicki
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jerzy Walecki
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|