1
|
Jung NY, Park JB. Von Hippel-Lindau Disease : A Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis, Genetics, Clinical Challenges, and Surveillance. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2025; 68:338-349. [PMID: 40109021 PMCID: PMC12062539 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2025.0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2025] [Revised: 03/13/2025] [Accepted: 03/15/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025] Open
Abstract
von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a genetic condition predisposing individuals to the development of benign and malignant tumors across various organs. This review explores the intricate genetic underpinnings of VHL disease, its clinical manifestations, and the associated malignancy risks. The latest diagnostic criteria, surveillance guidelines, and advancements in therapeutic strategies, including the Food and Drug Administration-approved hypoxia-inducible factor-2α inhibitor, belzutifan, are focused on. Through a multidisciplinary approach, tailored surveillance programs aim to improve patient outcomes while balancing intervention risks. Emerging technologies such as wholebody magnetic resonance imaging and liquid biopsies hold promises for enhancing non-invasive surveillance. This review underscores the significance of ongoing research and interdisciplinary care in managing this complex syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Young Jung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Jun Bum Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boltri M, Traunero F, Ongaro L, Migliozzi F, Vianello F, Lenardon O, Visalli F, Buttazzi L, Maruzzi D, Trombetta C, Simonato A, Pavan N, Claps F. The Added Value of Controlling Nutritional Status (Conut) Score for Preoperative Counselling on Significant Early Loss of Renal Function After Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3519. [PMID: 39456613 PMCID: PMC11506166 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Revised: 10/16/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We aimed at evaluating the impact of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score on clinically significant decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with non-metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a multi-institutional cohort of 140 patients with ccRCC who underwent RN between 2016 and 2018 at three Urological Centers. The CONUT score was calculated with an algorithm including serum albumin, total lymphocyte count, and cholesterol. Clinical and pathologic features were analyzed using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and a Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. To define the independent predictors of clinically significant eGFR decline, univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) binomial logistic regression analyses were performed in order to assess the Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). RESULTS The optimal cut-off value to discriminate between a low and high CONUT score was assessed by calculating the ROC curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.67 (95%CI 0.59-0.78) with the most appropriate cut-off value at 2 points. Overall, 46 patients (32.9%) had a high CONUT score (>2). Statistically significant variables associated with eGFR decline at 24 months were age ≥ 70 (OR 2.01; 95%CI 1.17-3.09; p 0.05), stage II-III chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR 6.05; 95%CI 1.79-28.3; p 0.001), and a high CONUT score (OR 3.98; 95%CI 1.58-10.4; p 0.004). CONCLUSIONS The CONUT score is a low-time-consuming, cost-effective, and promising tool able to preoperatively screen patients at risk of developing CKD after a RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Boltri
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (M.B.); (F.T.); (F.M.); (C.T.); (N.P.)
- Urology Unit, “San Giovanni di Dio” Hospital, 34170 Gorizia, Italy;
| | - Fabio Traunero
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (M.B.); (F.T.); (F.M.); (C.T.); (N.P.)
| | - Luca Ongaro
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK
| | - Francesca Migliozzi
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (M.B.); (F.T.); (F.M.); (C.T.); (N.P.)
| | - Fabio Vianello
- Urology Unit, “San Giovanni di Dio” Hospital, 34170 Gorizia, Italy;
| | - Oliviero Lenardon
- Urology Department, “Santa Maria degli Angeli” Hospital, 33170 Pordenone, Italy; (O.L.); (F.V.); (L.B.); (D.M.)
| | - Francesco Visalli
- Urology Department, “Santa Maria degli Angeli” Hospital, 33170 Pordenone, Italy; (O.L.); (F.V.); (L.B.); (D.M.)
| | - Lorenzo Buttazzi
- Urology Department, “Santa Maria degli Angeli” Hospital, 33170 Pordenone, Italy; (O.L.); (F.V.); (L.B.); (D.M.)
| | - Daniele Maruzzi
- Urology Department, “Santa Maria degli Angeli” Hospital, 33170 Pordenone, Italy; (O.L.); (F.V.); (L.B.); (D.M.)
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (M.B.); (F.T.); (F.M.); (C.T.); (N.P.)
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (M.B.); (F.T.); (F.M.); (C.T.); (N.P.)
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Francesco Claps
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (M.B.); (F.T.); (F.M.); (C.T.); (N.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saitta C, Paciotti M, Lughezzani G, Garofano G, Meagher MF, Yuen KL, Fasulo V, Contieri R, Avolio PP, Piccolini A, Arena P, Mantovani M, Beatrici E, Calatroni M, Reggiani F, Hurle RF, Lazzeri M, Saita A, Casale P, Derweesh IH, Buffi NM. Impact of Mayo Adhesive Probability score and BMI on renal functional decline after robotic assisted partial nephrectomy. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:942-949. [PMID: 39416753 PMCID: PMC11479805 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score and body mass index (BMI) on renal function decline after robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Methods We queried our prospective database for patients who underwent RAPN between January 2018 and December 2023. Outcomes were development of de novo CKD-S3 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2). Multivariable analysis (MVA) via Cox regression identified predictors for CKD-S3. Kaplan-Meier Analyses was fitted for survival assessment. Finally, multivariable linear regression was utilized to identify predictors of delta eGFR at last follow-up (preoperative eGFR-last eGFR). Results Two-hundred fifty-eight patients were analysed (obese n = 49 [19%]; MAP score 0-2 = 135 [52.33%]; MAP score 3-5 = 123 [47.6%]) with a median follow-up of 33 (IQR 20-42) months. MVA revealed, high MAP score (HR 2.29, p = 0.019), increasing RENAL score (HR 1.26, p = 0.009), increasing age (HR 1.04, p = 0.003), obesity (HR 2.38, p = 0.006) and diabetes mellitus (HR 2.38, p = 0.005) as associated with increased risk of development of CKD-S3, while trifecta achievement was not (p = 0.63). Comparing low MAP score versus high MAP score 4-year CKD-S3 free survival was 87.8% versus 56.1% (p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression showed that high MAP score (coefficient 6.64, p = 0.001) and BMI (coefficient 0.51, p = 0.011) were significantly associated with increased delta eGFR at last follow up. Conclusions MAP score and increasing BMI are predictor for long term renal functional detrimental. These insights may call consideration for closer follow-up or greater medical scrutiny prior surgery in obese patients and with elevated MAP score. Further investigations are requisite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Saitta
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego Health SystemLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Giuseppe Garofano
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | | | - Kit L. Yuen
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego Health SystemLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Vittorio Fasulo
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Pier Paolo Avolio
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Andrea Piccolini
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Paola Arena
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | | | - Edoardo Beatrici
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Marta Calatroni
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
- Nephrology and Dialysis DivisionIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Francesco Reggiani
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
- Nephrology and Dialysis DivisionIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Rodolfo F. Hurle
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Alberto Saita
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Paolo Casale
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | | | - Nicolò M. Buffi
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ali M, Koo K, Chang D, Chan P, Oon SF, Moon D, Murphy DG, Eapen R, Goad J, Lawrentschuk N, Azad AA, Chander S, Shaw M, Hardcastle N, Siva S. Low rate of severe-end-stage kidney disease after SABR for localised primary kidney cancer. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:23. [PMID: 38355495 PMCID: PMC10868020 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02413-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging treatment for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, its impact on renal function is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate incidence and clinical factors predictive of severe to end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) after SABR for RCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a Single institutional retrospective analysis of patients with diagnosed primary RCC receiving SABR between 2012-2020. Adult patients with no metastatic disease, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, and at least one post-SABR eGFR at six months or later were included in this analysis. Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Primary outcome was freedom from severe to end-stage CKD, determined using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The impact of baseline CKD, age, hypertension, diabetes, tumor size and fractionation schedule were assessed by Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Seventy-eight consecutive patients were included, with median age of 77.8 years (IQR 70-83), tumor size of 4.5 cm (IQR 3.9-5.8) and follow-up of 42.2 months (IQR 23-60). Baseline median eGFR was 58 mls/min; 55% (n = 43) of patients had baseline CKD stage 3 and the remainder stage 1-2. By last follow-up, 1/35 (2.8%) of baseline CKD 1-2, 7/27 (25.9%) CKD 3a and 11/16 (68.8%) CKD 3b had developed CKD stage 4-5. The estimated probability of freedom from CKD stage 4-5 at 1 and 5 years was 89.6% (CI 83.0-97.6) and 65% (CI 51.4-81.7) respectively. On univariable analysis, worse baseline CKD (p < 0.0001) and multi-fraction SABR (p = 0.005) were predictive for development of stage 4-5 CKD though only the former remained significant in multivariable model. CONCLUSION In this elderly cohort with pre-existing renal dysfunction, SABR achieved satisfactory nephron sparing with acceptable rates of severe to end-stage CKD. It can be an attractive option in patients who are medically inoperable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Ali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Kendrick Koo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Phil Chan
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sheng F Oon
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel Moon
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeremy Goad
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Arun A Azad
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarat Chander
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Shaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cerrato C, Meagher MF, Autorino R, Simone G, Yang B, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A, Porpiglia F, Capitanio U, Montorsi F, Porter J, Beksac AT, Puri D, Nguyen M, Wang L, Hakimi K, Dhanji S, Liu F, Cerruto MA, Pandolfo SD, Minervini A, Lau C, Monish A, Eun D, Mottrie A, Mir C, Sundaram C, Antonelli A, Kaouk J, Derweesh IH. Partial versus radical nephrectomy for complex renal mass: multicenter comparative analysis of functional outcomes (Rosula collaborative group). Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:425-433. [PMID: 37530659 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05123-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Utility of partial nephrectomy (PN) for complex renal mass (CRM) is controversial. We determined the impact of surgical modality on postoperative renal functional outcomes for CRM. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter registry (ROSULA). CRM was defined as RENAL Score 10-12. The cohort was divided into PN and radical nephrectomy (RN) for analyses. Primary outcome was development of de-novo estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Secondary outcomes were de-novo eGFR<60 and ΔeGFR between diagnosis and last follow-up. Cox proportional hazards was used to elucidate predictors for de-novo eGFR<60 and <45. Linear regression was utilized to analyze ΔeGFR. Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) was performed to analyze 5-year freedom from de-novo eGFR<60 and <45. RESULTS We analyzed 969 patients (RN=429/PN=540; median follow-up 24.0 months). RN patients had lower BMI (P<0.001) and larger tumor size (P<0.001). Overall postoperative complication rate was higher for PN (P<0.001), but there was no difference in major complications (Clavien III-IV; P=0.702). MVA demonstrated age (HR=1.05, P<0.001), tumor-size (HR=1.05, P=0.046), RN (HR=2.57, P<0.001), and BMI (HR=1.04, P=0.001) to be associated with risk for de-novo eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age (HR=1.03, P<0.001), BMI (HR=1.06, P<0.001), baseline eGFR (HR=0.99, P=0.002), tumor size (HR=1.07, P=0.007) and RN (HR=2.39, P<0.001) were risk factors for de-novo eGFR<45 mL/min/1.73 m2. RN (B=-10.89, P<0.001) was associated with greater ΔeGFR. KMA revealed worse 5-year freedom from de-novo eGFR<60 (71% vs. 33%, P<0.001) and de-novo eGFR<45 (79% vs. 65%, P<0.001) for RN. CONCLUSIONS PN provides functional benefit in selected patients with CRM without significant increase in major complications compared to RN, and should be considered when technically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Margaret F Meagher
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alp T Beksac
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dhruv Puri
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Mimi Nguyen
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Luke Wang
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Hakimi
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sohail Dhanji
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Franklin Liu
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Maria A Cerruto
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Clayton Lau
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Aron Monish
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Eun
- Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, Valencia, Spain
| | - Chandru Sundaram
- Department of Urology, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Larcher A, Belladelli F, Fallara G, Rowe I, Capitanio U, Marandino L, Raggi D, Capitanio JF, Bailo M, Lattanzio R, Barresi C, Calloni SF, Barbera M, Andreasi V, Guazzarotti G, Pipitone G, Carrera P, Necchi A, Mortini P, Bandello F, Falini A, Partelli S, Falconi M, De Cobelli F, Salonia A. Multidisciplinary management of patients diagnosed with von Hippel-Lindau disease: A practical review of the literature for clinicians. Asian J Urol 2022; 9:430-442. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
|
7
|
Von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated renal cell carcinoma: a call to action. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:31-39. [PMID: 34783716 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW While the molecular and genetic bases of Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease have been extensively investigated, limited evidence is available to guide diagnosis, local or systemic therapy, and follow-up. The aim of the current review is to summarize the ongoing trials both in preclinical and clinical setting regarding VHL disease management. RECENT FINDINGS Although genotype/phenotype correlations have been described, there is considerable inter and intra-familiar heterogeneity in VHL disease. Genetic anticipation has been reported in VHL disease. From a clinical point of view, expert-opinion-based protocols suggest testing those patients with any blood relative of an individual diagnosed with VHL disease, those with at least 1 or more suggestive neoplasms or patients presenting with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) diagnosed at a less than 40 years old, and/or multiple ccRCC. Clinical research is focused on safety and efficacy of systemic agents for patients with VHL-related ccRCC, with the aim to possibly preserve kidney function and improve patient survival. SUMMARY To date, preclinical and clinical research on the topic is scarce and clinical guidelines are not supported by strong validation studies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Huang R, Zhang C, Wang X, Hu H. Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T2 or Higher Stage Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:680842. [PMID: 34178668 PMCID: PMC8222682 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.680842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The choice of surgical method for clinically diagnosed T2 or higher stage kidney cancer remains controversial. Here, we systematically reviewed and collected published comparative studies on renal function, oncologic outcomes, and perioperative results of partial nephrectomy (PN) versus radical nephrectomy (RN) for larger renal tumors (T2 and above), and performed a meta-analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Following searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, the original studies on PN vs. RN in the treatment of T2 renal cancer were screened through strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan 5.4 was used for data analysis of the perioperative results, renal function, and oncologic outcomes of the two surgical methods for T2 renal tumor therapy. The weighted mean difference was used as the combined effect size for continuous variables, while the odds ratio (OR) or risk ratio (RR) was used as the combined effect size for binary variables. Both variables used a 95% confidence interval (CI) to estimate statistical accuracy. In cases with low heterogeneity, the fixed-effects model was used to pool the estimated value; otherwise, the random-effects model was used when significant heterogeneity was detected. RESULTS Fifteen retrospective studies including 5,056 patients who underwent nephrectomy (PN: 1975, RN: 3081) were included. The decline in estimated GFR (eGFR) after PN was lower than RN [(MD: -11.74 ml/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI: -13.15, -10.32; p < 0.00001)]. The postoperative complication rate of PN was higher than that of PN (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.56, 2.80; p < 0.00001)], and the postoperative overall survival (OS) of PN was higher than that of RN (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.90; p = 0.002), and tumor recurrence (RR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.90; p = 0.007). No obvious publication bias was found in the funnel chart of the OS rates of the two groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS PN is beneficial for patients with T2 renal tumors in terms of OS and renal function protection. However, it is also associated with a higher risk of surgical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Honglin Hu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Preoperative Elevation of C-Reactive Protein Is a Predictor for Adverse Oncologic Survival Outcomes for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis from the International Marker Consortium Renal Cancer (INMARC). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:e206-e215. [PMID: 33773937 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to analyze the usefulness of pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) as a predictor of survival and oncological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS Retrospective international analysis of patients with RCC with pretreatment CRP values from 2006 to 2017. A CRP of more than >5 mg/L was deemed elevated. The cohort was subdivided into 2 groups for analysis (normal CRP ≤5 mg/L; elevated CRP >5). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier analyses (KMA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were used to delineate survival outcomes and their predictors. RESULTS We analyzed 2445 patients (1641 male/804 female; normal CRP 1056/elevated CRP 1389; mean follow-up 36 months). Patients with elevated CRP had a higher incidence of hypertension (P = .001), higher body mass index (P < .001), and larger tumor size (6.0 cm vs 3.9 cm; P < .001). MVA for RFS demonstrated elevated CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P = .005), tumor size (HR, 1.1; P < .001), and high tumor grade (HR, 3.1; P < .001) to be independent risk factors. For normal vs elevated CRP, KMA for RFS of stages 1-4 RCC revealed a 5-year RFS of 93% vs 88% (P = .001), 95% vs 83% (P = .163), 84% vs 62% (P = .001), and 58% vs 60% (P = .513), respectively. KMA MA KMA for OS of stages 1-4 RCC revealed a 5-year OS of 98% vs 81% (P = .001), 94% vs 80% (P = .103), 94% vs 65% (P = .001), and 99% vs 38% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment CRP was an independent predictor of RFS and OS in an international multicenter cohort of patients with RCC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Cotta BH, Meagher MF, Patil D, Saito K, Patel SH, Patel DN, Miller N, Dutt R, Keiner C, Bradshaw AW, Wan F, Eldefrawy A, Yasuda Y, Fujii Y, Master V, Derweesh IH. Elevated preoperative C-reactive protein is associated with renal functional decline and non-cancer mortality in surgically treated renal cell carcinoma: analysis from the INternational Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC). BJU Int 2020; 127:311-317. [PMID: 32772468 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate association of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and non-cancer mortality (NCM) in a cohort of patients undergoing surgery for localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective multicentre analysis of patients surgically treated for clinical Stage 1-2 RCC from 2006 to 2017, excluding all cases of cancer-specific mortality. Descriptive analyses were obtained between the pre-treatment normal-CRP (≤5 mg/L) and elevated-CRP (>5 mg/L) groups. The primary outcome was NCM. The secondary outcomes included progression to de novo chronic kidney disease Stages 3-4 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of <60, <45, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to assess for risk factors associated with functional decline and NCM, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to obtain survival estimates for outcomes. RESULTS A total of 1987 patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy were analysed (normal-CRP group, n = 963; elevated-CRP group, n = 1024). Groups were similar in age (59 vs 60 years, P = 0.079). An elevated CRP was more frequent in males (36.8% vs 27.8%, P < 0.001), African-Americans (22.6% vs 2.9%, P < 0.001), and in those with a higher median body mass index (30 vs 25 kg/m2 , P < 0.001) and larger median tumour size (4.5 vs 3.3 cm, P < 0.001). On MVA, an elevated CRP was independently associated with development of de novo eGFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, P = 0.015), <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.41, P = 0.023) and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (odds ratio 2.23, P < 0.001). The MVA for factors associated with NCM demonstrated increasing age (HR 1.06, P < 0.001), preoperative elevated CRP (HR 2.18, P < 0.001) and an eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.16; P = 0.021) as independent risk factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly higher 5-year NCM in the elevated-CRP group vs the normal-CRP group (98% vs 80%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pre-treatment elevated CRP was independently associated with both progressive renal functional decline and NCM in patients undergoing surgery for Stage 1-2 RCC. Patients with elevated CRP and Stage 1 and 2 RCC may be considered as having indication for nephron-sparing strategies, which may be prioritised if oncologically appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittney H Cotta
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Margaret F Meagher
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Dattatraya Patil
- Department of Urology, Emory University Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Sunil H Patel
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Devin N Patel
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nathan Miller
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Raksha Dutt
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Cathrine Keiner
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Aaron W Bradshaw
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Fang Wan
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ahmed Eldefrawy
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Viraj Master
- Department of Urology, Emory University Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meagher MF, Lane BR, Capitanio U, Mehrazin R, Bradshaw AW, Noyes S, Larcher A, Eldefrawy A, Ghali F, Patel D, Bruinius J, Dutt R, Keiner C, Miller N, Wan F, Montorsi F, Derweesh IH. Comparison of renal functional outcomes of active surveillance and partial nephrectomy in the management of oncocytoma. World J Urol 2020; 39:1195-1201. [PMID: 32556559 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03299-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare functional outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) and active surveillance (AS) in oncocytoma. METHODS Multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with oncocytoma managed with PN or AS (biopsy-confirmed). Primary outcome development of de novo chronic kidney disease (CKD) (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2). Cox regression Multivariable analysis (MVA) was carried out for predictors of de novo CKD. Linear regression was carried out for factors associated with increasing deltaGFR. Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) was performed to analyze 5-year CKD-free survival. RESULTS 295 patients were analyzed (224 PN/71 AS, median follow-up 37.4 months). No differences were noted for clinical tumor size (AS 2.6 vs. PN 2.9 cm, p = 0.108), and baseline eGFR (AS 79.6 vs. PN 77, p = 0.9670). Median change in tumor diameter for AS was 0.42 cm. Compared to PN, AS had deltaGFR (-15.3 vs. -6.4 mL/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001) and de novo CKD (28.2% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.002). AS patients who developed CKD had higher RENAL score (p = 0.005) and lower baseline eGFR (73 vs. 91.2 mL/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001) than AS patients who did not. MVA demonstrated increasing age (OR = 1.03, p = 0.025), tumor size (HR = 1.26, p = 0.032) and AS (HR = 4.91, p < 0.001) to be predictive for de novo CKD. Linear regression demonstrated AS was associated with larger decrease in deltaGFR (B = -0.219, p < 0.001). KMA revealed 5-year CKD survival was higher in PN (87%) vs. AS (62%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION AS was associated with greater functional decline than PN in oncocytoma. PN may be considered to optimalize renal functional preservation in select circumstances. Further investigation into mechanisms of functional decline in oncocytoma is requisite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret F Meagher
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Brian R Lane
- Department of Urology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | | | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aaron W Bradshaw
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Sabrina Noyes
- Department of Urology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | | | - Ahmed Eldefrawy
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Fady Ghali
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Devin Patel
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Jacob Bruinius
- Department of Urology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Raksha Dutt
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Cathrine Keiner
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Nathan Miller
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Fang Wan
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | | | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bradshaw AW, Autorino R, Simone G, Yang B, Uzzo RG, Porpiglia F, Capitanio U, Porter J, Bertolo R, Minervini A, Lau C, Jacobsohn K, Ashrafi A, Eun D, Mottrie A, White WM, Schips L, Challacombe BJ, De Cobelli O, Mir CM, Veccia A, Larcher A, Kutikov A, Aron M, Dasgupta P, Montorsi F, Gill IS, Sundaram CP, Kaouk J, Derweesh IH. Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score‐matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group. BJU Int 2020; 126:114-123. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.15064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron W. Bradshaw
- Department of Urology UC San Diego School of Medicine La Jolla CAUSA
| | | | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology IRCCS‐"Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute Rome Italy
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Urology Changhai Hospital Shanghai China
| | - Robert G. Uzzo
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia USA
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology University of Turin‐San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital TurinItaly
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology Division of Experimental Oncology Urological Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Vita‐Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology Careggi Hospital University of Florence Florence Italy
| | - Clayton Lau
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology City of Hope National Medical Center Duarte CAUSA
| | | | - Akbar Ashrafi
- Institute of Urology University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles CAUSA
| | - Daniel Eun
- Department of Urology Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia PA USA
| | | | - Wesley M. White
- Department of Urology University of Tennessee Medical Center Knoxville TN USA
| | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Urology SS Annunziata Hospital "G.D'Annunzio" University of Chieti Chieti Italy
| | | | | | - Carmen M. Mir
- Department of Urology Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia Valencia Spain
| | | | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology Division of Experimental Oncology Urological Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Vita‐Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia USA
| | - Monish Aron
- Institute of Urology University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles CAUSA
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- Urology Centre Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology Division of Experimental Oncology Urological Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Vita‐Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy
| | - Inderbir S. Gill
- Institute of Urology University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles CAUSA
| | | | - Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Radical and Partial Nephrectomy in pT3a Pathologically Upstaged Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:e723-e729. [PMID: 32600941 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of partial nephrectomy (PN) in setting of pT3a pathologic-upstaged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. We compared oncologic and functional outcomes of radical nephrectomy (RN) and PN in patients with upstaged pT3a RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with cT1-2N0M0 RCC upstaged to pT3a postoperatively. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival, with secondary outcomes of overall survival and de novo estimated glomular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for oncologic outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses (KMA) were obtained to elucidate survival outcomes. RESULTS A total of 929 patients had pT3a upstaging (686 [72.6%] RN; 243 [25.7%] PN; mean follow-up, 48 months). Tumor size was similar (RN 7.7 cm vs. PN 7.3 cm; P = .083). PN had decreased ΔeGFR (6.1 vs. RN 19.4 mL/min/1.73m2; P < .001) and de novo eGFR < 60 (9.5% vs. 21%; P = .008). Multivariable analysis for recurrence showed increasing RENAL score (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; P < .001), clinical T stage (HR, 1.8; P < .001), positive margin (HR, 1.57; P = .009), and high grade (HR, 1.21; P = .01) to be independent predictors, whereas surgery was not (P = .076). KMA revealed 5-year recurrence-free survival for cT1-upstaged PN, cT1-upstaged RN, cT2-upstaged PN, and cT2-upstaged RN of 79%, 74%, 70%, and 51%, respectively (P < .001). KMA revealed 5-year overall survival for cT1-upstaged PN, cT1-upstaged RN, cT2-upstaged PN, and cT2-upstaged RN of 64%, 65.2%, 56.4%, and 55.2%, respectively (P = .059). CONCLUSIONS In pathologically upstaged pT3a RCC, PN did not adversely affect risk of recurrence and provided functional benefit. Surgical decision-making in patients at risk for T3a upstaging should be individualized and driven by tumor as well as functional risks.
Collapse
|