Ultrasound-based "CEUS-Bosniak"classification for cystic renal lesions: an 8-year clinical experience

[Clinical, multimodal sonography of the kidneys and urinary tract - Update 2025]

Modern ultrasound diagnostics holds a firm position as the first and ubiquitously available imaging modality in urology. The era of pocket ultrasound devices enables their highly mobile use at the bedside for any urological issue. In addition, technical advances in mid-range and high-end ultrasound devices are leading to improvements in existing B-mode sonography, particularly with high-resolution ultrasound probes with greater penetration depth, and give significant improvements in Doppler sonography for vascular imaging. Contrast-enhanced sonography allows the bedside examination of tissue microperfusion. This is helpful not only for perfusion issues in emergencies, but also for the differential diagnosis of renal lesions, and provides important diagnostic input to uro-oncological image conferences. Standardised examination protocols, electronic image documentation, and training of medical staff enable the efficient, reliable, and reproducible use of ultrasound diagnostics.

Ultrasound of the Upper Urinary Tract

Ultrasound (US) plays a primary role in the assessment and diagnosis of renal and ureteral pathologies and their management. It is considered the first-line imaging modality for evaluation of urinary obstruction, nephrolithiasis, and urinary retention among other indications. US is also essential for evaluation of renal vasculature and assessment of renal transplantation. Contrast-enhanced US is an advanced application of US gaining its acceptance in evaluation of the renal masses.

Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with quantitative analysis in Bosniak ≥ II cystic renal masses

OBJECTIVE

The 2019 Bosniak classification has improved the precise and detailed quantitative evaluation criteria, making the diagnosis of cystic renal masses (CRMs) more accurate and objective. This study addresses the clinical value of quantitative analysis and aims to investigate the feasibility of combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with quantitative analysis for diagnosing Bosniak ≥ II CRMs.

METHODS

We retrospectively obtained 58 CRMs with confirmed pathology, which underwent CEUS and Contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT) evaluations according to Bosniak classification between January 2013 and August 2024. These lesions were divided into benign and malignant groups, followed by a quantitative analysis of the morphological details detected by CEUS. All morphological parameters were compared, and the diagnostic efficiencies were evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, logistic regression (LR) analysis, and diagnostic curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, a cohort of 72 lesions was monitored for a period of ≥ 3 years, and changes in Bosniak classification were analyzed by categorizing them into stable, upgraded, and downgraded categories.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between CEUS and CECT in our cohort's malignancy predictive rates across different Bosniak grades (p = 0.640). All morphological quantitative parameters showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the sum of enhanced wall thickness and enhanced septum thickness among quantitative parameters had the highest AUC value (AUC: 0.9226). Both LR models demonstrated superior clinical diagnostic performance with similar level of accuracy between qualitative and quantitative analysis, as evidenced by ROC (AUC: 0.9470, 0.9619, respectively) and DCA analyses. None of the lesions in the follow-up cohort were upgraded, suggesting that CRMs are relatively stable tumors with a low malignant potential.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study demonstrated that CEUS combined with Bosniak classification and quantitative analysis could enhance diagnostic confidence in differentiating Bosniak ≥ II CRMs and could serve as a viable alternative to CECT in specific cases.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of renal masses in the pre-transplant setting: literature review with case highlights

With the rising incidence of chronic kidney disease worldwide, an increasing number of patients are expected to require renal transplantation, which remains the definitive treatment of end stage renal disease. Medical imaging, primarily ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI, plays a large role in pre-transplantation assessment, especially in the characterization of lesions within the native kidneys. However, patients with CKD/ESRD often have relative contraindications to CT- and MR-contrast agents, limiting their utilization within this patient population. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), which combines the high temporal and spatial resolution of ultrasonography with intravascular microbubble contrast agents, provides a promising alternative. This review aims to familiarize the reader with the literature regarding the use of CEUS in the evaluation of cystic and solid renal lesions and provide case examples of its use at our institution in the pre-transplant setting.

Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak Classification: intra- and inter-rater agreement, confounding features, and diagnostic performance

BACKGROUND

The contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) Bosniak classification, proposed by the European Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) in 2020, predicts malignancy in cystic renal masses (CRMs). However, intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for CEUS features has not been well investigated.

PURPOSE

To explore intra- and inter-rater agreement for US features, identify confounding features, and assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS Bosniak classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with complex CRMs who underwent CEUS examination from January 2013 to August 2023. Radiologists (3 experts and 3 novices) evaluated calcification, echogenic content, wall, septa, and internal nodules of CRMs using CEUS Bosniak classification. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were assessed using the Gwet agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC). Linear regression identified features associated with discrepancies in Bosniak category assignment. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of 103 complex CRMs were analyzed in 103 patients (mean age, 50 ± 15 years; 66 males). Intra-rater agreement for the Bosniak category was substantial to almost perfect (Gwet's AC 0.73-0.87). Inter-rater agreement was substantial for the Bosniak category (Gwet's AC 0.75) and moderate to almost perfect for US features (Gwet's AC 0.44-0.94). Nodule variation (i.e., absence vs. obtuse margin vs. acute margin) explained 84% of the variability in the Bosniak category assignment. CEUS Bosniak classification showed good diagnostic performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.90 for each rater.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS Bosniak classification demonstrated substantial intra- and inter-rater reproducibility and good diagnostic performance in predicting the malignancy potential of CRMs. Nodule variations significantly predicted differences in Bosniak category assignments.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak classification reliably predicts malignancy in cystic renal masses, demonstrating substantial reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy. This improves clinical decision-making and patient management.

KEY POINTS

Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for contrast-enhance US features for Bosniak classification have not been well investigated. Substantial inter-rater agreements for the Bosniak category and variable agreements for determining imaging features were found. Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak classification is reproducible and has good diagnostic performance for predicting malignancy in cystic renal masses.

Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Current Role in Adults and Children for Various Indications

Intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a rapidly evolving imaging technique that uses a microbubble contrast agent to enhance ultrasonographic images by augmenting characterization of blood vessels and organ perfusion. CEUS is considered as a useful problem-solving tool and as an indicated first-line imaging modality in select settings. CEUS technique has an inherent advantage over its predecessor B-mode and Doppler imaging. This article reviews different approved and off-label use of CEUS in the pediatric and adult population and also discusses Food and Drug Administration-approved contrast agents in the United States, their reported side effects, and ongoing efforts in the field.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Solid Renal Lesions

The availability of imaging methods has enabled increased detection of kidney lesions, which are a common clinical problem. It is estimated that more than half of patients over the age of 50 have at least one undetermined mass in the kidney. The appropriate characterization and diagnosis of lesions imaged in the kidney allows for proper therapeutic management. Previously, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been used in their extended diagnosis. However, the limitations of these techniques, such as radiation exposure, renal toxicity, and allergies to contrast agents, must be considered. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is increasingly being used as an examination to resolve interpretive doubts that arise with other diagnostic methods. Indeed, it can be considered both as a problem-solving technique for diagnosing and distinguishing lesions and as a technique used for observation in preservative treatment. Evaluation of the enhancement curve over time on CEUS examination can help to differentiate malignant renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes that should be resected from benign lesions, such as oncocytoma or angiomyolipoma (AML), in which surgery can be avoided. It allows for distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors, renal and pseudotumors, and solid and cystic tumors. Therefore, with recent advances in ultrasound technology, CEUS has emerged as a fast, reliable, and cost-effective imaging tool in the preoperative evaluation and diagnosis of solid renal masses.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant focal solid renal lesions in pediatric patients

The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been mainly applied to adults to differentiate benign and malignant renal lesions, however, the characteristics of CEUS in pediatric has not been as well studied as in adults. In the present work, the eligible pediatric patients who underwent renal CEUS between March 2016 and February 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. It included 20 lesions (median diameter, 8.4 cm; range, 1.8-18.0 cm) from 20 patients (median age, 28.0 months; range, 3.0-212.0 months; 9 boys) in malignant group and 5 lesions (median diameter, 3.8 cm; range, 1.3-7.5 cm) from 5 patients (median age, 25.0 months; range, 0.7-216.0 months; 2 boys) in benign group. The diagnostic performance was assessed. Nonparametric and Chi-square tests were performed. With hyperenhancement plus wash-out, CEUS showed a sensitivity of 95.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 75.1%, 99.9%], a specificity of 80.0% (CI: 28.4%, 99.5%), a positive predictive value of 95.0% (CI: 75.1%, 99.9%) and a negative predictive value of 80.0% (CI: 28.4%, 99.5%). It suggested that CEUS is a valuable technique for identifying between malignant and benign renal lesions in children.

The Predictive Power of Bosniak 3 and 4 Cystic Renal Lesion Categorization Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is increasingly utilized for the noninvasive assessment of renal cystic lesions, using the Bosniak grading system. Bosniak 3-4 lesions require surgical referral, which allows correlation with the histopathological outcome.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective study we evaluated renal CEUS exams conducted with SonoVue® with a diagnosis of a Bosniak 3 or 4 lesion between 2019 and 2022. A total of 49 patients and 50 lesions met the inclusion criteria, 31 lesions had available histopathological results. Patient demographics, cyst morphology, and dominant imaging features were registered. The histopathological diagnosis was considered a reference standard.

RESULTS

Positive predictive power (PPV) for neoplastic lesions was comparable in the Bosniak 3 and 4 categories (75 vs 93.3%, P = .33), while PPV for histopathologically malignant lesion was considerably higher in the latter group (25 vs 93.33%, P = .0002). None of the lesions which had vividly enhancing thin septa as their dominant CEUS feature were malignant. Oncocytoma, multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, and cystic nephroma were the major benign entities among Bosniak 3 lesions. Localized cystic kidney disease and hemorrhagic cysts were found to be the primary mimickers leading to false positive imaging findings.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS has a high predictive power for malignancy in the Bosniak 4 category, which is not maintained in the Bosniak 3 group due to the large proportion of benign lesions. Adherence to rigorous rule-in criteria and active surveillance strategies need to be considered for equivocal CEUS Bosniak 3 lesions.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Complex Cystic and Solid Breast Masses-A Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVE

Complex cystic and solid breast mass (CCSBM) is a radiological diagnosis based on grayscale B-mode sonographic features. Because of potential for malignancy, biopsy is typically recommended. We examined the feasibility of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) as a tool to identify benign CCSBMs.

METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved prospective observational study performed targeted CEUS of 14 CCSBMs that were subsequently biopsied. CEUS images were independently reviewed by two readers blinded to other sonographic features, noting presence or absence of enhancement and time to perceived optimal enhancement. Interobserver agreement for presence or absence of enhancement was analyzed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. From retrospective review of initial diagnostic US examinations, descriptive CCSBM sizes, subtypes, and Doppler information were recorded. Histopathologies were categorized as benign, benign with upgrade potential (BWUP), and malignant. Measures of diagnostic accuracy and 95% CIs were calculated for CEUS enhancement.

RESULTS

Of 14 CCSBMs, 12 were nonmalignant (9 benign, 3 BWUP) and 2 were malignant. There was perfect interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa 1.00) between the 2 readers for CEUS enhancement. CEUS was 100% sensitive, 25% specific, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.625 (95% CI, 0.50-0.75) in differentiating nonmalignant from malignant lesions. It was 100% sensitive, 33.3% specific, with an AUROC of 0.667 (95% CI, 0.50-0.85) in differentiating benign from surgically significant (BWUP and malignant) CCSBMs.

CONCLUSION

This small feasibility study highlighted the potential of CEUS as a safe noninvasive tool to identify the proportion of CCSBMs that are benign and can avoid tissue biopsy.

CEUS Bosniak Classification-Time for Differentiation and Change in Renal Cyst Surveillance

It is time for a change. CEUS is an established method that should be much more actively included in renal cyst monitoring strategies. This review compares the accuracies, strengths, and weaknesses of CEUS, CECT, and MRI in the classification of renal cysts. In order to avoid overstaging by CEUS, a further differentiation of classes IIF, III, and IV is required. A further development in the refinement of the CEUS-Bosniak classification aims to integrate CEUS more closely into the monitoring of renal cysts and to develop new and complex monitoring algorithms.

Cystic Renal Masses: Old and New Paradigms

Cystic renal masses describe a spectrum of lesions with benign and/or malignant features. Cystic renal masses are most often identified incidentally with the Bosniak classification system stratifying their malignant potential. Solid enhancing components most often represent clear cell renal cell carcinoma yet display an indolent natural history relative to pure solid renal masses. This has led to an increased adoption of active surveillance as a management strategy in those who are poor surgical candidates. This article provides a contemporary overview of historical and emerging clinical paradigms in the diagnosis and management of this distinct clinical entity.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Non-Enhancing Renal Masses on CEUS

PURPOSE

To determine the natural history and necessity of long-term follow-up of renal masses that do not demonstrate enhancement on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study was approved by our local IRB and is HIPAA compliant. Exactly 405 patients with 620 non-enhancing renal masses on CEUS from a previously reported study were followed for up to 10 years. Techniques and equipment are described in the original manuscript. Patient charts and imaging studies were reviewed for the change in features. There were 117 (18.6%) patients lost to follow-up leading to 341 patients with 512 lesions. The lesion size, patient age, number of lesions per patient, and Bosniak class assigned at the initial examination was recorded.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 66 ± 12.6 years (range 17-95 years). Average time of follow-up was 58.9 ± 41.7 months (range 1-207 months). There was a mean of 1.5 ± 1.0 lesions per patient (range 1-7 lesions). Lesion size was 24.9 ± 18.2 mm (range 3-161 mm). There were 276 (53.9%) patients with >5-year follow-up and 78 (15.2%) patients with >10-year follow-up. The probability of change within 5 years was 0% (95% CI: 0-0.37 per 100PY) and 10 years 0% (95% CI: 0.0-0.18 per 100PY). Two lesions (0.4%) resolved by 60 months. Five lesions (1.0%) decreased in size. Four lesions (0.8%) increased in size >20% during the follow-up period but remained benign on subsequent imaging.

CONCLUSION

Any non-enhancing renal mass on CEUS can be classified as benign.

[Ultrasound diagnostics: Differentiated vision - upgrading - better reimbursement]

Ultrasonography is an imaging modality of great importance in everyday clinical practice. Technical innovations continuously expand the diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities of ultrasonography requiring continuous upskilling of sonographers. Only a small number of practitioners, in hospital and practice settings in Germany, currently have the required level of skills. Therefore, these techniques are not as readily available as would be desirable. A modern high-end ultrasound scanner in the hands of a qualified sonographer is a diagnostic high-tech precision instrument, which can compete with any other imaging modality.In conclusion, basic sonography, as it is currently practised should be separated from high-end sonography, requiring extensive training and better remuneration. In this context the introduction of a new medical board speciality for ultrasonography, "Advanced Ultrasonography", with corresponding upgrading should be recommended for high-end sonography.