Artificial intelligence to improve cytology performance in urothelial carcinoma diagnosis: results from validation phase of the French, multicenter, prospective VISIOCYT1 trial

[What contribution can make artificial intelligence to urinary cytology?]

Urinary cytology using the Paris system is still the method of choice for screening high-grade urothelial carcinomas. However, the use of the objective criteria described in this terminology shows a lack of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. Moreover, if its sensitivity is excellent on instrumented urine, it remains insufficient on voided urine samples. Urinary cytology appears to be an excellent model for the application of artificial intelligence to improve performance, since the objective criteria of the Paris system are defined at cellular level, and the resulting diagnostic approach is presented in a highly "algorithmic" way. Nevertheless, there is no commercially available morphological diagnostic aid, and very few predictive devices are still undergoing clinical validation. The analysis of different systems using artificial intelligence in urinary cytology rises clear prospects for mutual contributions.

Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based model for detecting urothelial carcinoma using urine cytology images: a multicentre, diagnostic study with prospective validation

Background

Urine cytology is an important non-invasive examination for urothelial carcinoma (UC) diagnosis and follow-up. We aimed to explore whether artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance the sensitivity of urine cytology and help avoid unnecessary endoscopy.

Methods

In this multicentre diagnostic study, consecutive patients who underwent liquid-based urine cytology examinations at four hospitals in China were included for model development and validation. Patients who declined surgery and lacked associated histopathology results, those diagnosed with rare subtype tumours of the urinary tract, or had low-quality images were excluded from the study. All liquid-based cytology slides were scanned into whole-slide images (WSIs) at 40 × magnification and the WSI-labels were derived from the corresponding histopathology results. The Precision Urine Cytology AI Solution (PUCAS) was composed of three distinct stages (patch extraction, features extraction, and classification diagnosis) and was trained to identify important WSI features associated with UC diagnosis. The diagnostic sensitivity was mainly used to validate the performance of PUCAS in retrospective and prospective validation cohorts. This study is registered with the ChiCTR, ChiCTR2300073192.

Findings

Between January 1, 2018 and October 31, 2022, 2641 patients were retrospectively recruited in the training cohort, and 2335 in retrospective validation cohorts; 400 eligible patients were enrolled in the prospective validation cohort between July 7, 2023 and September 15, 2023. The sensitivity of PUCAS ranged from 0.922 (95% CI: 0.811-0.978) to 1.000 (0.782-1.000) in retrospective validation cohorts, and was 0.896 (0.837-0.939) in prospective validation cohort. The PUCAS model also exhibited a good performance in detecting malignancy within atypical urothelial cells cases, with a sensitivity of over 0.84. In the recurrence detection scenario, PUCAS could reduce 57.5% of endoscopy use with a negative predictive value of 96.4%.

Interpretation

PUCAS may help to improve the sensitivity of urine cytology, reduce misdiagnoses of UC, avoid unnecessary endoscopy, and reduce the clinical burden in resource-limited areas. The further validation in other countries is needed.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China; Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars; the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province; the National Key Research and Development Programme of China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Urological Diseases.

Pros and cons of artificial intelligence implementation in diagnostic pathology

The rapid introduction of digital pathology has greatly facilitated development of artificial intelligence (AI) models in pathology that have shown great promise in assisting morphological diagnostics and quantitation of therapeutic targets. We are now at a tipping point where companies have started to bring algorithms to the market, and questions arise whether the pathology community is ready to implement AI in routine workflow. However, concerns also arise about the use of AI in pathology. This article reviews the pros and cons of introducing AI in diagnostic pathology.

A Fully Automated Artificial Intelligence System to Assist Pathologists' Diagnosis to Predict Histologically High-grade Urothelial Carcinoma from Digitized Urine Cytology Slides Using Deep Learning

BACKGROUND

Urine cytology, although a useful screening method for urothelial carcinoma, lacks sensitivity. As an emerging technology, artificial intelligence (AI) improved image analysis accuracy significantly.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a fully automated AI system to assist pathologists in the histological prediction of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) from digitized urine cytology slides.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We digitized 535 consecutive urine cytology slides for AI use. Among these slides, 181 were used for AI development, 39 were used as AI test data to identify HGUC by cell-level classification, and 315 were used as AI test data for slide-level classification.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Out of the 315 slides, 171 were collected immediately prior to bladder biopsy or transurethral resection of bladder tumor, and then outcomes were compared with the histological presence of HGUC in the surgical specimen. The primary aim was to compare AI prediction of the histological presence of HGUC with the pathologist's histological diagnosis of HGUC. Secondary aims were to compare the time required for AI evaluation and concordance between the AI's classification and pathologist's cytology diagnosis.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The AI capability for predicting the histological presence of HGUC was 0.78 for the area under the curve. Comparing the AI predictive performance with pathologists' diagnosis, the AI sensitivity of 63% for histological HGUC prediction was superior to a pathologists' cytology sensitivity of 46% (p = 0.0037). On the contrary, there was no significant difference between the AI specificity of 83% and pathologists' specificity of 89% (p = 0.13), and AI accuracy of 74% and pathologists' accuracy of 68% (p = 0.08). The time required for AI evaluation was 139 s. With respect to the concordance between the AI prediction and pathologist's cytology diagnosis, the accuracy was 86%. Agreements with positive and negative findings were 92% and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a fully automated AI system to assist pathologists' histological diagnosis of HGUC using digitized slides. This AI system showed significantly higher sensitivity than a board-certified cytopathologist and may assist pathologists in making urine cytology diagnoses, reducing their workload.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we present a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that classifies urine cytology slides according to the Paris system. An automated AI system was developed and validated with 535 consecutive urine cytology slides. The AI predicted histological high-grade urothelial carcinoma from digitized urine cytology slides with superior sensitivity than pathologists, while maintaining comparable specificity and accuracy.

Digital cytology part 2: artificial intelligence in cytology: a concept paper with review and recommendations from the American Society of Cytopathology Digital Cytology Task Force

Digital cytology and artificial intelligence (AI) are gaining greater adoption in the cytology laboratory. However, peer-reviewed real-world data and literature are lacking in regard to the current clinical landscape. The American Society of Cytopathology in conjunction with the International Academy of Cytology and the Digital Pathology Association established a special task force comprising 20 members with expertise and/or interest in digital cytology. The aim of the group was to investigate the feasibility of incorporating digital cytology, specifically cytology whole slide scanning and AI applications, into the workflow of the laboratory. In turn, the impact on cytopathologists, cytologists (cytotechnologists), and cytology departments were also assessed. The task force reviewed existing literature on digital cytology, conducted a worldwide survey, and held a virtual roundtable discussion on digital cytology and AI with multiple industry corporate representatives. This white paper, presented in 2 parts, summarizes the current state of digital cytology and AI practice in global cytology practice. Part 1 of the white paper is presented as a separate paper which details a review and best practice recommendations for incorporating digital cytology into practice. Part 2 of the white paper presented here provides a comprehensive review of AI in cytology practice along with best practice recommendations and legal considerations. Additionally, the cytology global survey results highlighting current AI practices by various laboratories, as well as current attitudes, are reported.