[Cost calculations for treating penetrating eye injuries within the DRG C01Z at a university eye hospital]

[Cost unit accounting of strabismus surgery at a university eye hospital]

BACKGROUND

Strabismus surgery is frequently carried out in university centers. The aim of this work was to calculate the costs of strabismus surgery at a university hospital and to assess the remuneration of costs for outpatient procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of all strabismus surgeries at the Hanover Medical School in the years 2018 and 2019, relevant surgical data, such as patient age, number of muscles operated on, incision to suture time, attendance time of the surgeons and anesthetists as well as the nursing staff, were evaluated based on the clinics own information system. During this process, the costs for personnel, material, room rental charges and overheads were computed applying cost unit accounting.

RESULTS

A total of 302 operations (inpatient proportion 92.1%) were carried out in most cases with the patient under general anesthesia. The mean patient age was 31 years (median 26 years), with 33 patients being children under 6 years of age. On average 1.84 muscles were treated per intervention. The mean incision to suture time was 51.5 min, mean anesthesia time was 85 min, the attendance time of surgical as well as anesthesia nursing staff each accounted for 104 min, the additional time in the postanesthesia care unit added 66 min. Average personnel costs originating from the overall process amounted to 642.14 €, with the addition of 109.23 € for material and medication (surgery and anesthesia) and costs for cleaning and room rental (including overheads) of 178.71 €. Therefore, the overall costs of an average strabismus surgery in our collective added up to 930.08 € (minimum 491.01 €, maximum 1729.29 €). Cost accounting of subgroups yielded substantially higher costs for anesthesia in children as well as for higher numbers of muscles operated on due to different treatment duration (37 min for 1 muscle to 72 min for 3 muscles) and anesthesia time, especially in children <6 years of age (on average 22 min longer than adults and children >5 years; the differences being 11 min for 1 muscle, 25 min for 2 muscles and 30 min for 3 or more muscles). The pure costs of a strabismus surgery at this clinic seem on average to exceed the revenues for strabismus surgery in the outpatient sector calculated by the German uniform evaluation benchmark (EBM) by about a factor of 2.

CONCLUSION

It could be shown that the purely economically calculated costs for strabismus surgery at a university clinic are significantly higher than the revenues achieved in the outpatient sector according to paragraph 115b, section 1, of the Social Security Act V (SGB V). Under these circumstances, such operations cannot be performed in a cost-effective manner.

Utility of wound cultures in the management of open globe injuries: a 5-year retrospective review

Background

Endophthalmitis after open globe injury can be devastating to vision recovery. As treatment of endophthalmitis is often empiric, some surgeons may obtain cultures at presentation of trauma in anticipation of later infection. This study examines the usefulness of wound cultures obtained during globe repair.

Results

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed, with 168 open globes included. Cultures of the wound site had been taken in all cases included in this study. Wound cultures were positive in 63% of cases but were not used for clinical decision-making for any patient in this study. Two patients had evidence of endophthalmitis at presentation, with results of vitreous culture matching those from the wound. No patient later developed endophthalmitis after open globe repair.

Conclusions

Despite a high rate of wound contamination, few cases of endophthalmitis (1.2%) were seen in this series. In no case did the results of wound culture impact choice of antibiotic prophylaxis or treatment. Cultures obtained at the time of open globe repair were not cost effective in the subsequent management of the injury.

Direct cost of pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of macular hole, epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction: a bottom-up approach

PURPOSE

The direct cost to the National Health Service (NHS) in England of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is unknown since a bottom-up costing exercise has not been undertaken. Healthcare resource group (HRG) costing relies on a top-down approach. We aimed to quantify the direct cost of intermediate complexity PPV.

METHODS

Five NHS vitreoretinal units prospectively recorded all consumables, equipment and staff salaries during PPV undertaken for vitreomacular traction, epiretinal membrane and macular hole. Out-of-surgery costs between admission and discharge were estimated using a representative accounting method.

RESULTS

The average patient time in theatre for 57 PPVs was 72 min. The average in-surgery cost for staff was £297, consumables £619, and equipment £82 (total £997). The average out-of-surgery costs were £260, including nursing and medical staff, other consumables, eye drops and hospitalisation. The total cost was therefore £1634, including 30 % overheads. This cost estimate was an under-estimate because it did not include out-of-theatre consumables or equipment. The average reimbursed HRG tariff was £1701.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost of undertaking PPV of intermediate complexity is likely to be higher than the reimbursed tariff, except for hospitals with high throughput, where amortisation costs benefit from economies of scale. Although this research was set in England, the methodology may provide a useful template for other countries.

[Heterogeneity of costs and performance for penetrating eye injuries and suturing amniotic membranes under DRG conditions : Analysis of case constellations of the G-DRG C01B of the Regensburg University eye clinic]

BACKGROUND

Patients with penetrating eye injuries are a very heterogeneous group both medically and economically. Since 2009, treatment involving sutures for open eye injuries and cases requiring amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) were allocated to DRG C01B of the German diagnosis-related group system. However, given the significant clinical differences between these treatments, an inhomogeneity of costs to performance is postulated. This analysis describes case allocation problems within the G-DRG C01B category and presents solutions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted from the standardized G-DRG data of 277 patients with open eye injuries and AMT between 2007 and 2008, grouped under the 2008 G-DRG system version to the G-DRG C01Z category. This data was provided by the Department of Ophthalmology at the University Hospital Regensburg. Additionally case-based data of the following were supplemented: length of surgery, time of anesthesia and intensity of patient care. Fixed and variable costs were determined for surgery and other inpatient treatment. Finally, an analysis of the heterogeneity of costs within the G-DRG C01B of the G-DRG system 2009 was implemented.

RESULTS

Inhomogeneity was evident within the G-DRG C01B of the G-DRG system 2009 for the two groups suture of open eye injuries and AMT concerning the parameters length of stay, proportion of high outliers and cost per case. Multiple surgeries during an inpatient stay lead to an extended length of stay and increasing costs, especially within the AMT group. Intensity of patient care and the consideration of patient comorbidity did not yield relevant differences.

CONCLUSION

The quality of the G-DRG system is measured by its ability to obtain adequate funding for highly complex and heterogeneous cases. Specific modifications of the G-DRG structures could increase the appropriateness of case allocation for patients with open eye injuries within the G-DRG C01B of the German DRG system 2009. As a result of the present study, cases with amniotic membrane transplantation should not be allocated to the G-DRG C01B. A petition has been presented by the German Association of Ophthalmology (DOG) to the German DRG Institute to restructure the G-DRG C01B. Data-based analysis is an essential prerequisite for a constructive development of the G-DRG system and a necessary tool for the active participation of medical societies in this process.