Eigenserum und alternative Blutprodukte zur Behandlung von Augenoberflächenerkrankungen

Implications of nanotechnology for the treatment of Dry Eye Disease: Recent advances

Managing Dry Eye Disease (DED), a prevalent condition affecting the ocular surface, remains challenging despite advancements in diagnostics and therapies. Current treatments primarily involve lubricating eye drops and anti-inflammatory medications, which often require prolonged use and generally provide only symptomatic relief. The current study focuses on improving DED treatments through nano-drug delivery technologies and advanced formulations. These systems aim to address the limitations of conventional therapies by providing extended, targeted, and sustained drug release. The development of innovative nanomaterials offers improved precision, control, and customization for DED management. By enabling controlled and sustained drug release, these nano-drug delivery systems could offer longer-lasting relief, addressing the chronic nature of DED more effectively than current symptomatic therapies. Future research should focus on integrating multiple therapeutic agents within these systems to simultaneously target inflammation and tear film instability. This review examines the potential of nano-based materials for DED treatment, with a particular emphasis on lipid-based, polymer-based and polysaccharide-based systems.

Autologous blood in the management of ocular surface disorders

Autologous blood therapy has emerged as a promising modality in managing ocular surface disorders. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current literature regarding the use of autologous blood in ocular surface disorders, encompassing its physiological basis, clinical applications, techniques, challenges, and future perspectives. The ocular surface, comprising the cornea, conjunctiva, and tear film, plays a critical role in maintaining visual function, and its disruption can lead to various pathological conditions. With its rich composition of growth factors, cytokines, and other bioactive molecules, autologous blood offers therapeutic potential in promoting corneal wound healing, reducing inflammation, and improving tear film stability. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of autologous blood therapy in diverse ocular surface disorders, including persistent epithelial defects, neurotrophic keratopathy, and dry eye disease. However, challenges such as variability in treatment response, adverse effects, and optimal patient selection remain areas of concern. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of action, refine treatment protocols, and explore synergistic approaches with other therapeutic modalities. Despite these challenges, autologous blood therapy holds promise as a valuable adjunctive treatment option for ocular surface disorders, offering new avenues for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. This review examines the mechanisms underlying ocular surface disorders while discussing existing autologous blood-based therapies for managing these disorders. Current clinical trials are also summarized, and a comparison between autologous blood therapy and conventional eyedrops is attempted. Finally, safe techniques and protocols for autologous blood medicine are elucidated, and adverse effects and future perspectives of this novel therapy are reviewed.

[Autologous serum eye drops for therapy-resistant epithelial defects of the cornea : Impact of underlying disease and simultaneous amniotic transplantation in 990 applications]

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of simultaneous amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT), status of the cornea (own cornea vs. graft) and underlying disease on the success and recurrence rates of autologous serum (AS) in therapy-resistant epithelial defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2007 and 2019, 990 treatments with AS in 703 eyes of 645 patients were retrospectively examined. The presence of erosion or ulcer, use of AMT, status of the cornea and the underlying disease were recorded. Epithelial closure rate within 4 weeks and the recurrence rate after epithelial closure were main outcome measures. The median observation period was 50 months.

RESULTS

Epithelial closure was seen in 73.6% and recurrence in 27.4%. AMT was used significantly more often for ulcers (p < 0.001) and recurrences (p = 0.048). Without AMT, there was a significantly higher epithelial closure rate (p < 0.001) and faster healing tendency (p < 0.001). There was no difference between own corneas and grafts with respect to epithelial closure rate (p = 0.47). On the grafts there was a significantly higher recurrence rate (p = 0.004) and faster recurrence (p = 0.03), especially ≤6 months after epithelial closure. The underlying diseases showed a significant difference in epithelial closure rate (p = 0.02) and recurrence rate (p < 0.001) with highest success in corneal dystrophies and lowest in congenital aniridia.

CONCLUSION

AS is an effective therapeutic option for therapy-resistant epithelial defects. There was a high success rate for the grafts but with a higher tendency to develop recurrences. In cases of simultaneous AMT, a reduced success rate can be expected, due to the higher complexity of the given situation. AS can be used successfully in various underlying diseases, with limitations in case of congenital aniridia.

Involvement of ocular surface in graft-versus-host disease: An update from immunopathogenesis to treatment

Graft-versus-host disease is a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the ocular surface is a main target of inflammatory reaction.

Hyaluronic Acid as an Alternative to Autologous Human Serum Eye Drops: Initial Clinical Results with High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid Eye Drops

Introduction

Autologous serum eye drops (ASED) are used in the treatment of most severe stages of dry eye. Once introduced, it is currently considered impossible to return to other lubricating eye drops or other commercially available therapeutic regimen.

Materials and Methods

In a randomized study, non-preserved high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid eye drops were offered as an alternative to 11 patients using autologous serum treatment for at least 3 months. The control group (n = 5) continued their treatment with ASED. The verum group (n = 6) used very-high-molecular-weight hyaluronic eye drops (Comfort Shield®) instead of the ASED.

Results

From four of initially six patients in the verum group that finished the study, 2 (50%) preferred to stay with the very-high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid eye drops beyond the trial period, the other two returned to the earlier therapy with ASED. The control group continued their treatment as before and finished the study after 8 weeks.

Conclusion

For the first time, artificial eye drops, i.e., high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid eye drops, offered an acceptable alternative to ASED. Some patients perceived these drops as even better than the patient's own serum. This is the first evidence that optimization of the molecular structure of hyaluronic acid can be used to create eye drops that are perceived to be better than other tested tear substitutes and even patients' own serum. This offers a new treatment perspective for patients with very severe dry eye disease.

Autologous serum eye drops for dry eye

BACKGROUND

Theoretically, autologous serum eye drops (AS) offer a potential advantage over traditional therapies on the assumption that AS not only serve as a lacrimal substitute to provide lubrication but contain other biochemical components that allow them to mimic natural tears more closely. Application of AS has gained popularity as second-line therapy for patients with dry eye. Published studies on this subject indicate that autologous serum could be an effective treatment for dry eye.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AS given alone or in combination with artificial tears as compared with artificial tears alone, saline, placebo, or no treatment for adults with dry eye.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2016, Issue 5), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to July 2016), Embase (January 1980 to July 2016), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to July 2016), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We also searched the Science Citation Index Expanded database (December 2016) and reference lists of included studies. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 5 July 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared AS versus artificial tears for treatment of adults with dry eye.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts and assessed full-text reports of potentially eligible trials. Two review authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias and characteristics of included trials. We contacted investigators to ask for missing data. For both primary and secondary outcomes, we reported mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous outcomes. We did not perform meta-analysis owing to differences in outcome assessments across trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified five eligible RCTs (92 participants) that compared AS versus artificial tears or saline in individuals with dry eye of various origins (Sjögren's syndrome-related dry eye, non-Sjögren's syndrome dry eye, and postoperative dry eye induced by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)). We assessed the certainty of evidence as low or very low because of lack of reporting of quantitative data for most outcomes and unclear or high risk of bias among trials. We judged most risk of bias domains to have unclear risk in two trials owing to insufficient reporting of trial characteristics, and we considered one trial to have high risk of bias for most domains. We judged the remaining two trials to have low risk of bias; however, these trials used a cross-over design and did not report data in a way that could be used to compare outcomes between treatment groups appropriately. Incomplete outcome reporting and heterogeneity among outcomes and follow-up periods prevented inclusion of these trials in a summary meta-analysis.Three trials compared AS with artificial tears; however, only one trial reported quantitative data for analysis. Low-certainty evidence from one trial suggested that AS might provide some improvement in participant-reported symptoms compared with artificial tears after two weeks of treatment; the mean difference in mean change in symptom score measured on a visual analogue scale (range 0 to 100, with higher scores representing worse symptoms) was -12.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) -20.16 to -3.84; 20 participants). This same trial found mixed results with respect to ocular surface outcomes; the mean difference in mean change in scores between AS and artificial tears was -0.9 (95% CI -1.47 to -0.33; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) for fluorescein staining and -2.2 (95% CI -2.73 to -1.67; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) for Rose Bengal staining. Both staining scales range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating worse results. The mean change in tear film break-up time was 2.00 seconds longer (95% CI 0.99 to 3.01; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) in the AS group than in the artificial tears group. Investigators reported no clinically meaningful differences in Schirmer's test scores between groups (mean difference -0.40 mm, 95% CI -2.91 to 2.11; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of these three trials reported tear hyperosmolarity and adverse events.Two trials compared AS versus saline; however, only one trial reported quantitative data for analysis of only one outcome (Rose Bengal staining). Trial investigators of the two studies reported no differences in symptom scores, fluorescein staining scores, tear film break-up times, or Schirmer's test scores between groups at two to four weeks' follow-up. Very low-certainty evidence from one trial suggested that AS might provide some improvement in Rose Bengal staining scores compared with saline after four weeks of treatment; the mean difference in Rose Bengal staining score (range from 0 to 9, with higher scores showing worse results) was -0.60 (95% CI -1.11 to -0.09; 35 participants). Neither trial reported tear hyperosmolarity outcomes. One trial reported adverse events; two of 12 participants had signs of conjunctivitis with negative culture that did resolve.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, investigators reported inconsistency in possible benefits of AS for improving participant-reported symptoms and other objective clinical measures. There might be some benefit in symptoms with AS compared with artificial tears in the short-term, but we found no evidence of an effect after two weeks of treatment. Well-planned, large, high-quality RCTs are warranted to examine participants with dry eye of different severities by using standardized questionnaires to measure participant-reported outcomes, as well as objective clinical tests and objective biomarkers to assess the benefit of AS therapy for dry eye.

The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease

BACKGROUND

Dry eye disease (DED) is common; its prevalence around the world varies from 5% to 34%. Its putative pathogenetic mechanisms include hyperosmolarity of the tear film and inflammation of the ocular surface and lacrimal gland. Dry eye is clinically subdivided into two subtypes: one with decreased tear secretion (aqueous-deficient DED), and one with increased tear evaporation (hyperevaporative DED).

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective PubMed search and on the authors' own clinical and scientific experience.

RESULTS

The diagnostic evaluation of dry eye disease should include a detailed patient history, thorough split-lamp examination, and additional tests as indicated. Few randomized controlled therapeutic trials for dry eye have been published to date. Artificial tears of various kinds are recommended if the symptoms are mild. Lid hygiene is helpful in the treatment of hyperevaporative dry eye, while collagen or silicon plugs can be used for partial occlusion of the efferent lacrimal ducts to treat severe hyposecretory dry eye. The benefit of long-term topical anti-inflammatory treatment of moderate or severe dry eye disease with corticosteroids or cyclosporine A eye drops has been documented in clinical trials on a high evidence level. Orally administered tetraycycline derivatives and omega-3 or omega-6 fatty acids are also used.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of dry eye has evolved from tear substitution alone to a rationally based therapeutic algorithm. Current research focuses on pathophysiology, new diagnostic techniques, and novel therapies including secretagogues, topical androgens, and new anti- inflammatory drugs.

Autologous serum eye drops for dry eye

BACKGROUND

=Theoretically, autologous serum eye drops (AS) have a potential advantage over traditional therapies based on the assumption that ASserve not only as a lacrimal substitute to provide lubrication, but also contain other biochemical components mimicking natural tears more closely. The application of AS in dry eye treatment has gained popularity as a second-line therapy in the treatment of dry eye.Published studies on the subject indicate that autologous serum could be an effective treatment for dry eye.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of AS compared to artificial tears for treating dry eye.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 3),Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE,(January 1950 to April 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2013), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences(LILACS) (January 1982 to April 2013), themetaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov(www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We also searched the Science Citation Index Expanded database (September 2013) and reference lists of included studies. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 15 April 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which AS was compared to artificial tears in the treatment of dry eye in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts and assessed full-text articles of potentially eligible trials. Two review authors extracted data and assessed the methodological quality and characteristics of the included trials.We contacted investigators for missing data. For both primary and secondary outcomes, we reported mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals(CIs) for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified four eligible RCTs in which AS was compared with artificial tear treatment or saline in individuals (n = 72 participants)with dry eye of various etiologies (Sjögren’s syndrome-related dry eye, non-Sjögren’s syndrome dry eye and postoperative dry eye induced by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)). The quality of the evidence provided by these trials was variable. A majority of the risk of bias domains were judged to have an unclear risk of bias in two trials owing to insufficient reporting of trial characteristics.One trial was considered to have a low risk of bias for most domains while another was considered to have a high risk of bias for most domains. Incomplete outcome reporting and heterogeneity in the participant populations and follow-up periods prevented the inclusion of these trials in a summary meta-analysis. For the primary outcome, improvement in participant-reported symptoms at one month, one trial (12 participants) showed no difference in participant-reported symptoms between 20% AS and artificial tears. Based on the results of two trials in 32 participants, 20% AS may provide some improvement in participant-reported symptoms compared to traditional artificial tears after two weeks of treatment. One trial also showed positive results with a mean difference in tear breakup time (TBUT) of 2.00 seconds (95% CI 0.99 to 3.01 seconds) between 20% AS and artificial tears after two weeks, which were not similar to findings from the other trials. Based on all other objective clinical assessments included in this review, AS was not associated with improvements in aqueous tear production measured by Schirmer's test (two trials, 33 participants), ocular surface condition with fluorescein (four trials, 72 participants) or Rose Bengal staining (three trials, 60 participants), and epithelial metaplasia by impression cytology compared to artificial tears (one trial, 12 participants). Data on adverse effects were not reported by three of the included studies. In one study, there were no serious adverse events reported with the collection of and treatment with AS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall there was inconsistency in the possible benefits of AS in improving participant-reported symptoms and TBUT and lack of effect based on other objective clinical measures. Well-planned, large, high-quality RCTs are warranted, in different severities of dry eye and using standardized questionnaires to measure participant-reported outcomes and objective clinical tests as well as objective biomarkers to assess the benefit of AS therapy for dry eye.

Treating Sjögren's Syndrome: Insights for the Clinician

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is a systemic autoimmune disease that affects the exocrine glands, mainly the salivary and lachrymal glands, with consequent persistent dryness of the mouth and eyes. In addition to the clinical manifestations related to the exocrine gland involvement, a consistent prevalence of patients may present systemic manifestations. Some of these can be ascribed to the periepithelial extension of lymphocytic infiltration whilst others are determined by an immunomediated process affecting small- or medium-size vessels. While the use of tear and saliva substitutes and local or systemic stimulation of residual secretions represent the mainstays of the therapy of sicca component, different immunomodulating or immunosuppressive agents are usually required to treat extraglandular features, similarly to what happens in other connective tissue diseases. In the last few years, the advancement in the understanding the pathogenetic mechanisms of this disorder and the availability of new biologic target therapies seem to offer completely new therapeutic options. The use of B cell depleting or modulating therapies has achieved promising results.

Allogeneic serum eye drops for the treatment of dry eye patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of allogeneic serum eye drops for the treatment of dry eye in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) following bone marrow transplantation.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with cGVHD following allogeneic hematological stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and diagnosed with dry eye syndrome refractory to conventional treatment were prospectively enrolled in this study. Allogeneic serum eye drops were obtained from healthy related donors after serologic testing. Symptom scores, tear breakup time (tBUT), the Schirmer test without anesthesia (Schirmer I test), tear osmolarity, corneal staining score, impression cytology grade, and goblet cell densities were evaluated before and 4 weeks after administration of allogeneic serum eye drops.

RESULTS

Enrolled patients included 6 females and 10 males between 20 and 61 years of age (mean age, 37.2±11.6 years). After 4 weeks of treatment, the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) symptom scores decreased significantly (32.5-8.9). Tear osmolarity showed a significant decrease from 311.1 to 285.1 milliosmol. The corneal staining scores significantly decreased from 2.5 to 1.8. Impression cytology grade and goblet cell density improved from 3.4 to 2.4 and from 90.6 to 122.6 cell/mm(2), respectively. tBUT also significantly improved from 2.9 to 4.4 s, and the Schirmer I test results showed improvement, but lacked statistical significance (1.7-2.4 mm). No significant side effects were detected as a result of the allogeneic serum treatment during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Allogeneic serum can be used for the treatment of severe dry eye in patients with cGVHD when autologous serum is unavailable. Care should be taken to avoid the risk of blood-borne diseases.

A three-phase in-vitro system for studying Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion and biofilm formation upon hydrogel contact lenses

Background

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is commonly associated with contact lens (CL) -related eye infections, for which bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation upon hydrogel CLs is a specific risk factor. Whilst P. aeruginosa has been widely used as a model organism for initial biofilm formation on CLs, in-vitro models that closely reproduce in-vivo conditions have rarely been presented.

Results

In the current investigation, a novel in-vitro biofilm model for studying the adherence of P. aeruginosa to hydrogel CLs was established. Nutritional and interfacial conditions similar to those in the eye of a CL wearer were created through the involvement of a solid:liquid and a solid:air interface, shear forces and a complex artificial tear fluid. Bioburdens varied depending on the CL material and biofilm maturation occurred after 72 h incubation. Whilst a range of biofilm morphologies were visualised including dispersed and adherent bacterial cells, aggregates and colonies embedded in extracellular polymer substances (EPS), EPS fibres, mushroom-like formations, and crystalline structures, a compact and heterogeneous biofilm morphology predominated on all CL materials.

Conclusions

In order to better understand the process of biofilm formation on CLs and to test the efficacy of CL care solutions, representative in-vitro biofilm models are required. Here, we present a three-phase biofilm model that simulates the environment in the eye of a CL wearer and thus generates biofilms which resemble those commonly observed in-situ.

Autologous serum 50% eyedrops in the treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defects

PURPOSE

To evaluate the success rate of treating persistent corneal epithelial defects using 50% autologous serum eyedrops.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of all patients seen at our institution from September 2004 to May 2007 who had persistent corneal epithelial defects that were nonresponsive to conventional medical treatment and that were treated with 50% autologous serum eyedrops. We also correlated the defect duration prior to initiation of serum therapy with rate of epithelial healing.

RESULTS

A total of 25 eyes of 25 patients failed conventional medical therapy for treatment of a persistent corneal epithelial defect and were treated with 50% autologous serum eyedrops every 2 hours while awake. All corneas were neurotrophic, with the etiologies being herpetic (11 eyes), postkeratoplasty (8 eyes), postkeratorefractive surgery (1 eyes), diabetic (1 eye), post-chemical burn (1 eye), and unknown (3 eyes). The median duration of the epithelial defects prior to initiation of autologous serum eyedrops was 13.9 weeks (range 0.29-52 weeks). After institution of autologous serum therapy, 23 of the 25 eyes healed in a mean time of 22.4 days. Seventeen eyes (68.0%) healed within 4 weeks (mean 1.7 weeks) of starting therapy with 50% autologous serum eyedrops. The number of days required for healing was associated with the length of time the defect was open prior to initiation of serum drops (r = 0.68, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 50% autologous serum eyedrops appears to be an efficacious medical treatment modality for persistent corneal epithelial defects that are recalcitrant to conventional medical therapy.

[On the use of autologous serum eyedrops in Germany : results of a survey among members of the Cornea Section of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG)]

PURPOSE

The use of serum eye drops has become more common for treating ocular surface diseases such as persistent epithelial defect and dry eye. For the production and use of blood products, regulatory restrictions apply. We surveyed the practice of production and application of serum eyedrops among the members of the Cornea Section of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) in Germany.

METHODS

A questionnaire concerning the application of topical blood-derived therapeutic agents for use in the eye was sent to 103 institutions in 2005 and 2007. The questionnaire included 14 groups of questions.

RESULTS

The rate of response was 49% in 2005 and 55% in 2007. Sixty-five percent (2005: 48%) of the institutions used blood-derived products as therapeutic agents in the eye (in 96%, serum eye drops). In 2007, 17% of the centers stated that they had a license to produce serum eye drops according to the official regulations (2005: 10%). Three hospitals stopped using serum eyedrops for regulatory reasons. In 2007 1,237 patients were treated (2005: 1,389); 36% of the ophthalmic departments produced the serum eye drops themselves (2005: 55%) and 43% produced them in cooperation together with or exclusively in another institution. Quality controls (e.g., virus serology and sterility checks) were performed in 47% (2005: 24%). In 2005, one corneal fibrin deposit was described. In 2007, no complication was reported.

CONCLUSION

Although fewer patients were treated in total in 2007, the number of centers using serum eye drops increased between 2005 and 2007. Serious complications were not described. Some hospitals stopped the production and use of serum eye drops because of regulatory reasons or had the drops produced by nonophthalmic institutions with a license to produce blood-derived products. In view of prospective randomized clinical trials showing that autologous serum support ocular surface wound healing, this therapy should be accepted as a standard of care.