[Treatment of chronic blepharokeratoconjunctivitis with local calcineurin inhibitors]

BlephEx-treatment for blepharitis: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Blepharitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the eyelids that affects a large proportion of patients in eye care settings. First-line treatments provide only partial relief for many patients. The BlephEx™ device provides automated eyelid debridement and aims to remove pathogenic biofilms from the eyelid margin to treat blepharitis long-term. However, evidence supporting the efficacy of BlephEx™ is limited.

METHODS

In this double-masked randomized controlled trial, 42 patients with symptomatic blepharitis refractory to treatment were assigned to the BlephEx™ treatment or sham treatment group. Outcome measures including Ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test, and Efron grading scale scores were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks. A crossover design in which the treatment groups were swapped after 4 weeks was used as a recruitment tool. After receiving treatment, two patients (one per group) were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

The sham group exhibited a significant decrease in the Efron Grading Scale score. No significant differences were observed in the other outcomes between the two groups. The BlephEx™ group showed slightly greater decreases in the OSDI and Efron grading scale scores and an increase in the TBUT than did the sham group, but these differences were not statistically significant. Mild discomfort was the most common side effect and occurred equally in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference in outcomes was observed between patients who underwent BlephEx™ therapy and those who received sham treatment. BlephEx™ treatment cannot be recommended for treating blepharitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered on February 16, 2024 in the DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register under https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00033492 ) under the trial registration number DRKS00033492.

Definition and Diagnostic Criteria for Pediatric Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis

Importance

Pediatric blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (PBKC) is a chronic, sight-threatening inflammatory ocular surface disease. Due to the lack of unified terminology and diagnostic criteria, nonspecific symptoms and signs, and the challenge of differentiation from similar ocular surface disorders, PBKC may be frequently unrecognized or diagnosed late.

Objective

To establish a consensus on the nomenclature, definition, and diagnostic criteria of PBKC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This quality improvement study used expert panel and agreement applying the non-RAND modified Delphi method and open discussions to identify unified nomenclature, definition, and definitive diagnostic criteria for PBKC. The study was conducted between September 1, 2021, and August 14, 2022. Consensus activities were carried out through electronic surveys via email and online virtual meetings.

Results

Of 16 expert international panelists (pediatric ophthalmologists or cornea and external diseases specialists) chosen by specific inclusion criteria, including their contribution to scientific leadership and research in PBKC, 14 (87.5%) participated in the consensus. The name proposed was "pediatric blepharokeratoconjunctivitis," and the agreed-on definition was "Pediatric blepharokeratoconjunctivitis is a frequently underdiagnosed, sight-threatening, chronic, and recurrent inflammatory eyelid margin disease associated with ocular surface involvement affecting children and adolescents. Its clinical spectrum includes chronic blepharitis, meibomitis, conjunctivitis, and corneal involvement ranging from superficial punctate keratitis to corneal infiltrates with vascularization and scarring." The diagnostic criteria included 1 or more suggestive symptoms accompanied by clinical signs from 3 anatomical regions: the eyelid margin, conjunctiva, and cornea. For PBKC suspect, the same criteria were included except for corneal involvement.

Conclusions and Relevance

The agreements on the name, definition, and proposed diagnostic criteria of PBKC may help ophthalmologists avoid diagnostic confusion and recognize the disease early to establish adequate therapy and avoid sight-threatening complications. The diagnostic criteria rely on published evidence, analysis of simulated clinical cases, and the expert panel's clinical experience, requiring further validation with real patient data analysis.

Developing and validating a questionnaire to assess the symptoms of blepharitis accompanied by dry eye disease

PURPOSE

To propose additional items for established dry eye disease (DED) instruments that cover blepharitis-specific signs and symptoms and to determine the association between the clinical findings and subjective complaints.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with blepharitis and DED were prospectively included in the pretest period for selecting suitable questions. In the main phase of the study, the selected questions were then tested on 68 patients with blepharitis and DED and 20 controls without blepharitis or DED. Pearson's coefficient of correlation was calculated between the blepharitis-specific questions, tear break-up time (TBUT), the Schirmer test score, and the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score; and the similarity between the blepharitis-specific questions, OSDI questions, and objective parameters for DED was assessed via hierarchical clustering. Furthermore, the discriminatory power of the blepharitis-specific questions was investigated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The additional question about heavy eyelids revealed a significant correlation with the OSDI score (r = 0.45, p < 0.001) and Schirmer score (r =  - 0.32, p = 0.006). Cluster analysis demonstrated the similarity between the question about heavy eyelids and TBUT. In addition, the OSDI questionnaire had the highest discriminatory power in ROC analysis, and the OSDI score significantly correlated with the specific questions about eyelids sticking together (r = 0.47, p < 0.0001) and watery or teary eyes (r = 0.34, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The blepharitis-specific additional questions were closely associated with objective parameters for DED. The question about heavy eyelids might be well suited for recording the symptoms of hyposecretory and hyperevaporative dry eye with blepharitis.

[Chronic Blepharitis]

Blepharitis represents a frequent inflammatory condition of the lids including the lid margin, which can be apparent in adults and children. Chronic blepharitis is therapeutically challenging. According to the anatomic localization, blepharitis can be graded in anterior and posterior forms. Blepharitis can lead to severe symptoms and complications, mainly dry eye disease, corneal complications and defective lid position. The pathogenesis of chronic blepharitis is not fully understood so far, however, multifactorial disease proceedings are supposed, which include systemic diseases (mainly dermatological disorders), habitual bacteria and infections. In all these processes inflammatory changes are the common final path.Therapeutic strategies include topical and systemic therapies, however evidence levels are generally low and patients are often resistant to therapy. Basic therapeutic measures are warm compresses, lid hygiene and lubricants. Topical anti-inflammatory drugs comprise corticosteroids and ciclosporin A. Topical and systemic antibiotics are commonly used. Systemic intake of omega-3 fatty acids is often recommended due to its anti-inflammatory potential.

Chronische Blepharitis

Blepharitis ist eine häufige entzündliche Erkrankung der Augenlider einschließlich des Lidrandes, die bei Erwachsenen und Kindern auftreten und schwere Symptome hervorrufen haben kann. Je nach anatomischer Lokalisation kann die Blepharitis in anteriore und posteriore Formen eingeteilt werden. Die Pathogenese der chronischen Blepharitis ist noch nicht vollständig geklärt, es wird jedoch ein multifaktorielles Krankheitsgeschehen vermutet. Die Erkrankung stellt eine therapeutische Herausforderung dar.

[Ocular involvement in atopic dermatitis : Clinical aspects and therapy]

Patients with atopic dermatitis frequently complain of ocular symptoms. The general dermatitis can directly affect the periocular skin and patients often present with chronic atopic blepharokeratoconjunctivitis. Early diagnosis of the characteristic ophthalmological alterations, such as blepharitis, allergic conjunctivitis, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, conjunctival scarring with formation of symblepharon and lid malpositioning, filiform keratitis, corneal plaques, (persistent) epithelial defects, corneal ulcers and keratoconus as well as appropriate stage-adapted treatment, including lid hygiene with preservative-free lubricants, topical and sometimes systemic anti-inflammatory therapy and surgical treatment are important for patients to prevent long-term damage of the ocular surface leading to severe visual impairment.

Topical treatments for blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in children

BACKGROUND

Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (BKC) is a type of inflammation of the surface of the eye and eyelids that involves changes of the eyelids, dysfunction of the meibomian glands, and inflammation of the conjunctiva and cornea. Chronic inflammation of the cornea can lead to scarring, vascularisation and opacity. BKC in children can cause significant symptoms including irritation, watering, photophobia and loss of vision from corneal opacity, refractive error or amblyopia.Treatment of BKC is directed towards modification of meibomian gland disease and the bacterial flora of lid margin and conjunctiva, and control of ocular surface inflammation. Although both topical and systemic treatments are used to treat people with BKC, this Cochrane review focuses on topical treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare data on the efficacy and safety of topical treatments (including antibiotics, steroids, immunosuppressants and lubricants), alone or in combination, for BKC in children from birth to 16 years.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2016, Issue 6), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE ( January 1946 to 11 July 2016), Embase (January 1980 to 11 July 2016), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 11 July 2016. We searched the reference lists of identified reports and the Science Citation Index to identify any additional reports of studies that met the inclusion criteria.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials that involved topical treatments in children up to 16 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of BKC. We planned to include studies that evaluated a single topical medication versus placebo, a combination of treatments versus placebo, and those that compared two or multiple active treatments. We planned to include studies in which participants received additional treatments, such as oral antibiotics, oral anti-inflammatories, warm lid compresses and lid margin cleaning.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the results of the literature search (titles and abstracts) to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria of the review and applied standards as expected for Cochrane reviews. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one study from the USA that met the inclusion criteria. In the study, 137 children aged zero to six years old with blepharoconjunctivitis were randomised to treatment in one of four trial arms (loteprednol etabonate/tobramycin combination, loteprednol etabonate alone, tobramycin alone or placebo) for 15 days, with assessments on days 1, 3, 7 and 15. We judged the study to be at high risk of attrition bias and bias due to selective outcome reporting. The study did not report the number of children with improvement in symptoms nor with total or partial success as measured by changes in clinical symptoms.All children showed a reduction in blepharoconjunctivitis grade score, but there was no evidence of important differences between groups. Visual acuity was not fully reported but the authors stated that there was no change in visual acuity in any of the treatment groups. The study reported ocular and non ocular adverse events but was underpowered to detect differences between the groups. Ocular adverse events were as follows: loteprednol/tobramycin 1/34 (eye pain); loteprednol 4/35 (eye pain, conjunctivitis, eye discharge, eye inflammation); tobramycin 0/34; placebo (vehicle) 0/34. The evidence was limited for all these outcomes and we judged it to be very low certainty.There was no information on clinical signs (aside from grade score), disease progression or quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no high-quality evidence of the safety and efficacy of topical treatments for BKC, which resulted in uncertainty about the indications and effectiveness of topical treatment. Clinical trials are required to test efficacy and safety of current and any future treatments. Outcome measures need to be developed which can capture both objective clinical and patient-reported aspects of the condition and treatments.

[Treatment options for chronic blepharitis considering current evidence]

The goal of the treatment of chronic blepharitis lies in the reduction of inflammation, which can be achieved by warming, mechanical, and immunomodulatory measures as well as acaricide medication in cases with pathogenetically relevant demodicosis.

Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in childhood: corneal involvement and visual outcome

PURPOSE

The main objective of this study is to describe the prevalence, degree and risk of corneal involvement, and visual impact in a pediatric population with blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (BKC).

METHODS

Retrospective, observational, case-control study. Clinical records of patients ≤16 years old with BKC seen between 2006 and 2012 were reviewed. The prevalence and relative risk of corneal involvement was evaluated between patients with and without corneal affection through a univariate and multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Visual acuity at presentation and at last follow-up visit was also analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen children with BKC, with a male-to-female ratio of 1 : 1 and a mean age at diagnosis of 9.13 years. The mean follow-up time was 26.4 (±25) months. Corneal involvement was present in 39.5% of patients, varying from superficial punctate keratitis to perforation. Corneal changes were not seen in children under 4 years old. The risk of corneal affection was greater in patients with photophobia, hordeolum, female gender and asymmetric disease (OR of 2.69, 11.6, 2.35 and 2.77, respectively). The mean best-corrected visual acuity at presentation was 0.20 (corneal affected group), compared to 0.11 (unaffected group; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed an older age at time of diagnosis and a worse visual outcome in patients with BKC and corneal disease compared with previous reports. Early diagnosis and detection of risk factors for corneal involvement, as well as adequate treatment, is mandatory to prevent serious long-term visual repercussions in children with BKC.

The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease

BACKGROUND

Dry eye disease (DED) is common; its prevalence around the world varies from 5% to 34%. Its putative pathogenetic mechanisms include hyperosmolarity of the tear film and inflammation of the ocular surface and lacrimal gland. Dry eye is clinically subdivided into two subtypes: one with decreased tear secretion (aqueous-deficient DED), and one with increased tear evaporation (hyperevaporative DED).

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective PubMed search and on the authors' own clinical and scientific experience.

RESULTS

The diagnostic evaluation of dry eye disease should include a detailed patient history, thorough split-lamp examination, and additional tests as indicated. Few randomized controlled therapeutic trials for dry eye have been published to date. Artificial tears of various kinds are recommended if the symptoms are mild. Lid hygiene is helpful in the treatment of hyperevaporative dry eye, while collagen or silicon plugs can be used for partial occlusion of the efferent lacrimal ducts to treat severe hyposecretory dry eye. The benefit of long-term topical anti-inflammatory treatment of moderate or severe dry eye disease with corticosteroids or cyclosporine A eye drops has been documented in clinical trials on a high evidence level. Orally administered tetraycycline derivatives and omega-3 or omega-6 fatty acids are also used.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of dry eye has evolved from tear substitution alone to a rationally based therapeutic algorithm. Current research focuses on pathophysiology, new diagnostic techniques, and novel therapies including secretagogues, topical androgens, and new anti- inflammatory drugs.

[Immunosuppressives to prevent rejection reactions after allogeneic corneal transplantation]

In order to prevent rejection of an allogeneic corneal transplant after perforating (high risk) keratoplasty, active agents from different classes of pharmacological substances are used, as with solid organ transplantation. In addition to glucocorticoids, antiproliferative agents, small molecule inhibitors and antibodies, those belonging to the group of macrolides with their many derivatives represent an interesting class of substances in this context. As a supplement to cyclosporin A (CSA) the most successful macrolide in transplantation medicine, animal experiments are currently being carried out to test newer macrolide derivatives, such as sanglifehrin A (SFA). This overview describes the classes of drugs and modes of action of currently administered standard medications in the clinical routine and new developments are presented.

Molecular Diagnostics of Calcineurin-Related Pathologies

BACKGROUND

The Ca2+-dependent protein phosphatase enzyme calcineurin (Cn) (protein phosphatase 3) is best known for its role as director of the adaptive immune response. One of its principal substrates is the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), which translocates to the nucleus after dephosphorylation to mediate gene transcription. Drugs targeting Cn (the Cn inhibitors tacrolimus and cyclosporin A) have revolutionized posttransplantation therapy in allograft recipients by considerably reducing rejection rates.

CONTENT

Owing primarily to intensive study of the side effects of the Cn inhibitors, the unique importance of Cn and Cn/NFAT signaling in the normal physiological processes of many other cell and tissue types is becoming more evident. During the last decade, it has become clear that an extensive and diverse array of clinical conditions can be traced back, at least in part, to a disturbed Cn-signaling axis. Hence, both diagnostics and therapeutic monitoring could benefit from a technique that conveniently reads out Cn/NFAT operative status.

SUMMARY

This review outlines the current knowledge on the pathologic conditions that have calcineurin as a common denominator and reports on the progress that has been made toward successfully applying Cn and Cn/NFAT activity markers in molecular diagnostics.