Prasugrel effectively reduces the platelet reactivity units in patients with genetically metabolic dysfunction of cytochrome P450 2C19 who are treated with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy after undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation

Ticagrelor versus Adjusted-Dose Prasugrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor or adjusted-dose prasugrel has been used for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, few studies have directly compared these two drugs. In this study, we compared the real-world applications and outcomes of these two drugs in patients with ACS who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the data of eligible patients with ACS who had undergone PCI at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital System between June 2019 and December 2021. The primary efficacy-related outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and the primary safety-related outcome was major bleeding. Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score was performed to reduce confounding effects. The study included 2,636 patients; of them, 429 received prasugrel and 2,207 received ticagrelor. No significant between-group difference was observed in the risk of MACE (13.1 vs. 13.1 events per 100 person-years, respectively, hazard ratio (HR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-1.43). Both groups exhibited similar rates of major bleeding (3.9 vs. 4.1 events per 100 person-years, respectively, subdistribution HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.68-1.35). In real-world settings, adjusted-dose prasugrel and ticagrelor exhibit comparable safety and efficacy profiles in East Asian patients with ACS after PCI. Our findings offer valuable insights for future clinical decision making and patient management strategies.

Multiple genetic mutations increase the risk of thrombosis associated with clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention

Background: The effect of multiple mutations in CYP2C19, PON1 and ABCB1 genes on the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention remains unclear. Methods: In total, 263 Chinese Han patients were enrolled in this study. Platelet aggregation rates and thrombosis risk were used to compare clopidogrel responses and outcomes in patients with different numbers of genetic mutations. Results: Our study demonstrated that 74% of the patients carried more than two genetic mutations. High platelet aggregation rates were associated with genetic mutations in patients receiving clopidogrel and aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention. Genetic mutations were closely related to the recurrence of thrombotic events, but not bleeding. The number of genes that become dysfunctional in patients is directly correlated with the risk of recurrent thrombosis. Conclusion: Compared with CYP2C19 alone or the platelet aggregation rate, it is more helpful to predict clinical outcomes by considering the polymorphisms of all three genes.

2023 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndrome

Coronary artery disease (CAD) covers a wide spectrum from persons who are asymptomatic to those presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and sudden cardiac death. Coronary atherosclerotic disease is a chronic, progressive process that leads to atherosclerotic plaque development and progression within the epicardial coronary arteries. Being a dynamic process, CAD generally presents with a prolonged stable phase, which may then suddenly become unstable and lead to an acute coronary event. Thus, the concept of "stable CAD" may be misleading, as the risk for acute events continues to exist, despite the use of pharmacological therapies and revascularization. Many advances in coronary care have been made, and guidelines from other international societies have been updated. The 2023 guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for CAD introduce a new concept that categorizes the disease entity according to its clinical presentation into acute or chronic coronary syndromes (ACS and CCS, respectively). Previously defined as stable CAD, CCS include a heterogeneous population with or without chest pain, with or without prior ACS, and with or without previous coronary revascularization procedures. As cardiologists, we now face the complexity of CAD, which involves not only the epicardial but also the microcirculatory domains of the coronary circulation and the myocardium. New findings about the development and progression of coronary atherosclerosis have changed the clinical landscape. After a nearly 50-year ischemia-centric paradigm of coronary stenosis, growing evidence indicates that coronary atherosclerosis and its features are both diagnostic and therapeutic targets beyond obstructive CAD. Taken together, these factors have shifted the clinicians' focus from the functional evaluation of coronary ischemia to the anatomic burden of disease. Research over the past decades has strengthened the case for prevention and optimal medical therapy as central interventions in patients with CCS. Even though functional capacity has clear prognostic implications, it does not include the evaluation of non-obstructive lesions, plaque burden or additional risk-modifying factors beyond epicardial coronary stenosis-driven ischemia. The recommended first-line diagnostic tests for CCS now include coronary computed tomographic angiography, an increasingly used anatomic imaging modality capable of detecting not only obstructive but also non-obstructive coronary plaques that may be missed with stress testing. This non-invasive anatomical modality improves risk assessment and potentially allows for the appropriate allocation of preventive therapies. Initial invasive strategies cannot improve mortality or the risk of myocardial infarction. Emphasis should be placed on optimizing the control of risk factors through preventive measures, and invasive strategies should be reserved for highly selected patients with refractory symptoms, high ischemic burden, high-risk anatomies, and hemodynamically significant lesions. These guidelines provide current evidence-based diagnosis and treatment recommendations. However, the guidelines are not mandatory, and members of the Task Force fully realize that the treatment of CCS should be individualized to address each patient's circumstances. Ultimately, the decision of healthcare professionals is most important in clinical practice.

A HANC Risk Stratification Score for Antiplatelet Therapy Optimization with Low-Dose Prasugrel in Taiwanese Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients from the Switch Study

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients experience high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) on clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed key independent risk factors associated with significant HPR risk on clopidogrel, but not prasugrel, in the Switch Study cohort of 200 Taiwanese ACS patients who switched from clopidogrel to low-dose prasugrel for maintenance DAPT after PCI.

METHODS

Univariate analysis and stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify key independent risk factors for HPR on clopidogrel, but not prasugrel.

RESULTS

A HANC [H: low hemoglobin (< 13 g/dL for men and < 12 g/dL for women); A: age ≥ 65 years; N: non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; C: chronic kidney disease as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min] risk stratification score was developed, and demonstrated optimal sensitivity and specificity at a cutoff score of ≥ 2. The HANC score compared favorably against the recently validated ABCD score in the full Switch Study cohort (n = 200), and the ABCD-GENE score in a genotyped cohort (n = 102).

CONCLUSIONS

The HANC score may serve to alert clinicians to patients at potentially higher HPR risk on clopidogrel, but not prasugrel. Further research to validate this score and assess its correlation with clinical outcomes is warranted.

Impact of perioperative antithrombotic strategies on clinical events in non-cardiac surgery

Antithrombotic therapy including antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants are prescribed for secondary prevention in patients with established cardiovascular disease. Although antithrombotic therapy is often interrupted before non-cardiac surgery with or without perioperative bridging anticoagulation, the impact on thrombotic and bleeding events remains uncertain. A total of 360 patients chronically treated with antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention underwent elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia, with the complete interruption of antithrombotic agents. The study endpoints included all-cause death, thrombotic events, and major bleeding complications after surgical procedures. Of 360 patients, 190 (52.8%) and 200 (55.6%) received antiplatelet and anticoagulation perioperatively. Atrial fibrillation (32.8%) and coronary artery disease (22.5%) were the major indications for antithrombotic regimens. Antithrombotic therapy was interrupted from 5 [2, 7] days before the surgery to 4 [2, 7] days postoperatively. Perioperative bridging therapy with unfractionated heparin was employed in 113 (31.4%) patients. During the hospitalization, one (0.3%) patient died due to non-cardiovascular causes. Thrombotic events and major bleeding occurred in two (0.6%) and eight (2.2%) patients. Bridging therapy with heparin was significantly associated with an increased risk of bleeding events (5.3% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.02). Pre-operative bridging therapy with heparin and operative duration were significantly associated with bleeding complications. In the present study, complete interruption of antithrombotic therapy resulted in a few thrombotic events in patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Bridging therapy with heparin and longer operative duration were significantly associated with post-operative bleeding complications.

The Role of Genetic Polymorphism and Other Factors on Clopidogrel Resistance (CR) in an Asian Population with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)

Clopidogrel is a widely-used antiplatelet drug. It is important for the treatment and prevention of coronary heart disease. Clopidogrel can effectively reduce platelet activity and therefore reduce stent thrombosis. However, some patients still have ischemic events despite taking the clopidogrel due to the alteration in clopidogrel metabolism attributable to various genetic and non-genetic factors. This review aims to summarise the mechanisms and causes of clopidogrel resistance (CR) and potential strategies to overcome it. This review summarised the possible effects of genetic polymorphism on CR among the Asian population, especially CYP2C19 *2 / *3 / *17, where the prevalence rate among Asians was 23.00%, 4.61%, 15.18%, respectively. The review also studied the effects of other factors and appropriate strategies used to overcome CR. Generally, CR among the Asian population was estimated at 17.2-81.6%. Therefore, our overview provides valuable insight into the causes of RC. In conclusion, understanding the prevalence of drug metabolism-related genetic polymorphism, especially CYP2C19 alleles, will enhance clinical understanding of racial differences in drug reactions, contributing to the development of personalised medicine in Asia.

Effects of switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel at the chronic phase after coronary stenting on antiplatelet action and vascular endothelial function: Switch-Pras study

Compared to clopidogrel, prasugrel has a lower incidence of ischemic events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because of an early reduction during the acute phase in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). The objective of this study was to compare the antiplatelet effect and vascular endothelial function of both drugs during the chronic phase after PCI. Patients who had undergone PCI and were confirmed to have no restenosis by follow-up coronary angiography under dual anti-platelet therapy with clopidogrel (75 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day) were randomized to either continue clopidogrel or switch to prasugrel (3.75 mg/day). At baseline, prior to randomization we determined the CYP2C19 genotype. At the baseline and 24 weeks after randomization, the P2Y12 reactivity unit (PRU) was measured using the VerifyNow™ P2Y12 assay. Endothelial function was evaluated by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT), while and circulating CD34+/CD133+/CD45^low progenitor cells were measured by flow cytometric analysis. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level was also measured. The PRU was reduced significantly in the prasugrel group (P = 0.0008), especially in patients who were intermediate or poor metabolizers based on the CYP2C19 genotype (P < 0.0001). This reduction was not observed in the clopidogrel group. The number of CD34+/CD133+/CD45^low cells increased in the clopidogrel group (P = 0.008), but not in the prasugrel group. The hsCRP, FMD and reactive hyperemia index measured by RH-PAT did not change in either group. Prasugrel is potentially better than clopidogrel for preventing thrombotic events, although clopidogrel may have an advantage over prasugrel in terms of preventing atherosclerotic events. Proper use of thienopyridine drugs based on the CYP2C19 genotype has promising clinical potential.

Serum interleukin-18 levels as a predictor for patients with genetic dysfunction of cytochrome P450 2C19 in dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

P2Y₁₂ reaction unit (PRU) is an index of platelet activity upon treatment with clopidogrel. In spite of suitable P2Y₁₂ reactions in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), cardiovascular events actually occur in some patients, possibly due to a genetic dysfunction of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19), which is a major metabolic enzyme of clopidogrel. As testing the CYP2C19 phenotypes to predict such patients may lack general versatility in daily clinical practice, the aim of this study was to examine whether measuring the blood levels of some cytokines in patients showing desirable PRUs in DAPT with clopidogrel could be a substitute for testing the CYP2C19 phenotypes.

METHODS

We analyzed relationships among PRU, serum levels of 51 cytokines, and CYP2C19 phenotypes in 22 patients receiving DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel after PCI.

RESULTS

Seventeen, 18, and 19 of 22 patients indicated PRU ≤ 208, PRU ≤ 230, and PRU ≤ 262, respectively. Approximately 60% of the patients had a genetically metabolic dysfunction of CYP2C19, and the serum levels of interleukin-18 were independently increased in those patients (p = 0.024 in patients with PRU ≤ 208, p = 0.021 with PRU ≤ 230, and p = 0.020 with PRU ≤ 262). The area under the curves in plot receiver operating characteristics curves for the serum levels of interleukin-18 were 0.94, 0.96, and 0.90 in the non-extensive metabolizer patients with PRU ≤ 208, PRU ≤ 230, and PRU ≤ 262, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The serum levels of interleukin-18 may be a predictor to diagnose patients who receive undesirable DAPT with clopidogrel, possibly due to the genetic dysfunction of CYP2C19 in spite of suitable P2Y₁₂ reactions after PCI.