Bleeding events and mid-term mortality in the patients undergoing endovascular interventions for peripheral artery disease of the lower limbs based on the academic research consortium high bleeding risk criteria

Clinical Outcomes Based on High Bleeding Risk in Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease Who Have Undergone Endovascular Therapy

PURPOSE

Endovascular therapies (EVTs) for symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) are efficient and minimally invasive. However, patients with PAD tend to have high bleeding risk (HBR), and there are limited data regarding the HBR for patients with PAD after EVT. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and severity of HBR, as well as its association with clinical outcomes in the patients with PAD who underwent EVT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria were applied to 732 consecutive patients with lower extremity PAD post-EVT to assess the prevalence of HBR, and its association with major bleeding events, all-cause mortality, and ischemic events. The ARC-HBR scores (1 point for each major criterion and 0.5 points for each minor criterion) were obtained and the patients were divided into four groups (score: 0-0.5; low risk, score: 1-1.5; moderate risk, score: 2-2.5; high risk, and score: ≥3; very high risk) according to the score. Major bleeding events were defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type-3 or type-5 bleeding, and ischemic events were defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and acute limb ischemia within 2 years.

RESULTS

High bleeding risk occurred in 78.8% of the patients. Major bleeding events, all-cause mortality, and ischemic events occurred in 9.7%, 18.7%, and 6.4% of the study cohort, respectively, within 2 years. During the follow-up period, major bleeding events significantly increased with the ARC-HBR score. The severity of the ARC-HBR score was significantly associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events (high risk: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.28, 24.62]; p=0.022; very high risk: adjusted HR: 10.37; 95% CI: [2.32, 46.30]; p=0.002). All-cause mortality and ischemic events also significantly increased with higher ARC-HBR score.

CONCLUSIONS

High bleeding risk patients with lower extremity PAD can be at a high risk of bleeding events, mortality, and ischemic events after EVT. The ARC-HBR criteria and its associated scores can successfully stratify HBR patients and assess the bleeding risk in patients with lower extremity PAD who undergo EVT.Clinical ImpactEndovascular therapies (EVTs) for symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) are efficient and minimally invasive. However, patients with PAD tend to have high bleeding risk (HBR), and there are limited data regarding the HBR for patients with PAD after EVT. Post EVT, most of the patients with PAD were classified as having HBR using the Academic Research Consortium for HBR (ARC-HBR) criteria and the rate of bleeding events as well as mortality and ischemic events within 2 years increased as the ARC-HBR score increased in this retrospective study of 732 participants. HBR patients with PAD can be at high risk of not only bleeding events but also mortality and ischemic events in the mid-term. The ARC-HBR criteria and its associated scores can successfully stratify HBR patients and assess the bleeding risk in patients with PAD who underwent EVT.

Antithrombotic Therapy in High Bleeding Risk, Part II: Noncardiac Percutaneous Interventions

Over the past decades, there have been great advancements in the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, but most of the available evidence derives from studies conducted in the setting of cardiac interventions. Antithrombotic treatment regimens used in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac interventions, in particular coronary, are frequently extrapolated to patients undergoing noncardiac interventions. However, the differences in risk profile of the population treated and the types of interventions performed may translate into differences is the safety and efficacy associated with antithrombotic therapy. Noncardiac percutaneous interventions are commonly performed in patients at high bleeding risk, which may indeed impact outcomes, hence underscoring the importance of risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making processes. In this review, we appraise the available evidence on antithrombotic therapy in high-bleeding-risk patients undergoing noncardiac percutaneous interventions.

Two-year outcomes of endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal arterial lesions for patients with high bleeding risk

The Academic Research Consortium (ARC) recently published a definition of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the prevalence of the ARC-HBR criteria in patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal arterial lesions has not been thoroughly investigated. The study population comprised 165 patients undergoing initial EVT for femoropopliteal lesions between June 2018 and June 2020. They were divided into two groups according to the ARC-HBR criteria. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 2 years of EVT. The 165 patients were divided into two groups: 125 (75.8%) patients at HBR (HBR group) and 40 (24.2%) patients at no HBR (non-HBR group). The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in the HBR group than in the non-HBR group (40.6% vs. 0%, log-rank p < 0.001). The HBR group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause death, major bleeding, and TLR than the non-HBR group (25.2% vs. 0%, log-rank p = 0.004, 13.9% vs. 0%, log-rank p = 0.047, 16.8% vs. 0%, log-rank p = 0.035). Most patients with peripheral artery disease were classified as HBR patients, and HBR patients were at higher risk of death, major bleeding, and TLR than non-HBR patients.

Growth Differentiation Factor-15 and Clinical Outcomes in Lower Extremity Artery Disease

AIM

Lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is an increasingly common health problem that is associated with high mortality due to thrombotic and bleeding events. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15), a stress-response cytokine belonging to the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily, is associated with cardiovascular disease and its outcomes. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of serum GDF15 levels on clinical outcomes in patients with LEAD.

METHODS

We measured serum GDF15 levels in 200 patients with LEAD before their initial endovascular therapy. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality rate. The secondary endpoints, on the other hand, were thrombotic and bleeding events, such as cerebral infarction, acute coronary syndrome, acute limb ischemia, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 and 5.

RESULTS

The serum GDF15 levels increased with advancing Fontaine class. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the high-GDF15 group (≥ 2,275 pg/mL) had higher rates of all-cause deaths and thrombotic and bleeding events than the low-GDF15 group (＜2,275 pg/mL). Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis revealed that GDF15 was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and thrombotic and bleeding events after adjusting for confounding risk factors. When the ABC-AF-bleeding score was substituted for GDF15, similar results were obtained.

CONCLUSION

Serum GDF15 levels were associated with all-cause mortality and thrombotic and bleeding events in patients with LEAD. Serum GDF15 is a potentially useful marker of clinical outcomes, specifically for tracking thrombotic and bleeding events in patients with LEAD.

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia is a Residual Bleeding Risk Factor among Patients with Lower Extremity Artery Disease

AIM

Lower-extremity artery disease (LEAD) is a high-risk factor for bleeding. However, the specific risk factors for bleeding in patients with LEAD remain unclear. We aimed to identify risk factors for bleeding in patients with LEAD after endovascular treatment (EVT).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 732 consecutive patients with LEAD who underwent EVT between January 2018 and December 2019. Patient characteristics, laboratory data, target lesions, and medications were compared between patients with and without chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Predictive bleeding risk factors were explored using Cox regression analysis with differential models.

RESULTS

In model 1, a body mass index (BMI) ＜18.5 kg/m2, prior heart failure, high bleeding risk, use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus warfarin, and CLTI were predictive bleeding risk factors (hazard ratio [HR] 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-3.52; p＜0.01; HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.28-3.55; p＜0.01; HR 3.40; 95% CI 1.28-3.55; p＜0.01; HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.33-5.84; p＜0.01; respectively). In model 2, a BMI ＜18.5 kg/m2, prior heart failure, anemia (＜11 g/dL), low platelet count (＜10*104/µL), chronic kidney disease, use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus warfarin, and CLTI were independent risk factors for bleeding (model 2: HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.12-3.56; p=0.02; HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.39-3.90; p＜0.01; HR 2.71; 95% CI 1.64-4.50; p＜0.01; HR 2.66; 95% CI 1.00-5.89; p=0.05; HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.25-5.45; p＜0.01; HR 2.79; 95% CI 1.24-5.63; p=0.01; respectively) Conclusions: CLTI is a residual and predictive risk factor for bleeding in patients with LEAD. We have to pay attention to the bleeding events of patients with CLTI after EVT during follow-up.

Association between High Bleeding Risk and 2-Year Mortality in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

AIM

Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have a high bleeding risk (HBR) and mortality rate. The 2-year life expectancy is an important factor in deciding the appropriate treatment strategy. This study aimed to assess the influence of HBR on the prognosis of patients with CLTI.

METHODS

A total of 259 patients with CLTI who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) (mean age, 76.2 years; male, 62.9%) between January 2018 and December 2019 were evaluated. The Academic Research Consortium for HBR (ARC-HBR) criteria were applied to each patient, and the ARC-HBR scores were calculated. The cut-off score for predicting all-cause mortality within two years was derived using a survival classification and regression tree (CART) model. Causes of death and the association between ARC-HBR scores and major bleeding events within two years were also investigated.

RESULTS

Based on the CART model, patients were divided into three groups (low HBR score 0-1.0, 48 patients; moderate HBR score 1.5-3.0, 176 patients; and high HBR score ≥ 3.5, 35 patients). During the study period, 82 patients (39.6%) died due to cardiac (n=23) and non-cardiac causes (n=59). All-cause mortality increased significantly with increasing ARC-HBR scores. Cox multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between high ARC-HBR scores and the risk of all-cause mortality within two years. Major bleeding events increased significantly with increasing ARC-HBR scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARC-HBR score could predict 2-year mortality in patients with CLTI who underwent EVT. Thus, this score can help determine the best revascularization strategy for patients with CLTI.

Validation of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in patients undergoing peripheral endovascular interventions

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria could apply to peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT).

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the application of the ARC-HBR criteria to PAD patients undergoing EVT with contemporary drug-coated devices (DCD) for femoropopliteal artery lesions.

METHODS

Between May 2012 and December 2019, 542 consecutive patients undergoing EVT with DCD for femoropopliteal artery lesions were retrospectively analysed. The primary study endpoint was major bleeding events, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5.

RESULTS

Of 542 patients, 435 (80.3%) were stratified into the HBR group. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding events was significantly higher in the HBR group than in the non-HBR group (31.9% vs 2.3%; p<0.001). The 5-year major bleeding event rate gradually increased with the number of ARC-HBR criteria (≥2 major criteria: 48.6%, 1 major: 33.1%, ≥2 minor: 12.9%, and non-HBR: 2.3%; p<0.001). Major bleeding events were associated with a 5.4-fold increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 5.42, 95% confidence interval: 2.91-10.1; p<0.001). Severe chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and severe anaemia were predictors of major bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

80.3% of PAD patients undergoing EVT for femoropopliteal artery lesions with contemporary drug-coated devices met the ARC-HBR criteria. Given that major bleeding events remarkably increased the risk of mortality after EVT, the ARC-HBR criteria might be helpful for the risk stratification of PAD patients who undergo EVT with contemporary DCD.

Predictors of success and puncture site complications in the distal radial approach

The distal radial approach (DRA) has been proposed as an alternative approach for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, the predictors of DRA failure and puncture site complications are unclear. Among 7153 consecutive patients undergoing CAG or PCI between November 2018 and January 2021, 3610 patients undergoing CAG or PCI with DRA were analyzed. The primary endpoint of this study was the procedural success, and the secondary endpoint of this study was puncture site complications during procedure. Puncture site complications during procedure were defined as a composite of major bleeding, minor bleeding, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and neuropathy. The DRA success rate and the puncture site complication rate were 90.4% and 7.7%, respectively. The predictors of DRA failure were low body weight and dual antiplatelet therapy; those of DRA success were PCI and ultrasonography-guided DRA; those of puncture site complications during procedure were low body weight, peripheral arterial disease, dual antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, and PCI; and that of no puncture site complications were previous PCI and ultrasonography-guided DRA. The negative predictors of DRA success with no puncture site complication during procedure were low body weight and dual antiplatelet therapy. The positive predictor of DRA success with no puncture site complication during procedure was ultrasonography-guided DRA. We identified the predictors of DRA failure and puncture site complications during procedure in patients undergoing CAG and PCI with DRA. Ultrasonography-guided DRA was associated with a high DRA success rate and a low puncture site complication rate in patients undergoing CAG or PCI with DRA.